Wikipedia:WikiProject Feminism/Assessment

The assessment department of the Feminism WikiProject focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Feminism-related articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the Version 1.0 Editorial Team program.

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Feminism}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Feminism articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

FAQ

See also the general assessment FAQ

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.

2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?

Just add {{WikiProject Feminism}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Feminism}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?

Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).

4. Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Feminism WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.

5. How do I rate an article?

Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.

6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

7. What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.

8. Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

Assessment instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Feminism}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WikiProject Feminism| class=??? }}

The following values may be used:

• FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Feminism articles)
• A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Feminism articles)
• GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Feminism articles)
• B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Feminism articles)
• C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Feminism articles)
• Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Feminism articles)
• Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Feminism articles)
• FL (adds articles to Category:FL-Class Feminism articles)
• List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Feminism articles)
• Dab (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Feminism articles)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Feminism articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale

Grading scheme

WikiProject content quality grading scheme Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example  FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate. Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra (as of June 2018)  FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process. Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)  A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)  GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Psychology (as of January 2024) C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow. Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing (as of June 2018) Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Ball (as of September 2014) Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of literary movements

Log

Feminism articles by quality, assessment log

December 21, 2024 Reassessed Category:Anarcha-feminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Template:Anarcha-feminism sidebar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Template-Class. (rev · t) Category:Anarcha-feminist collectives (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Anarcha-feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) File:Bertha Lutz 1925.jpg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to File-Class. (rev · t) Template:Emma Goldman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Template-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of the United States Air Force (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of the United States Army (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of the United States Marine Corps (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist book publishing companies (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist novels (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist studies scholars (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist theatre (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Fiction about abortion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Films about abortion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Indian feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Template:Mahsa Amini protests (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Template:Spanish women Civil War sidebar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Template-Class. (rev · t) Category:Violence against Indigenous women in Canada (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) File:Voltairine de Cleyre (Age 35).jpg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to File-Class. (rev · t) File:We Can Do It! NARA 535413 - Restoration 2.jpg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to File-Class. (rev · t) WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Primer for AfD, AfC and PROD (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Project-Class. (rev · t) WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Primer for creating women's biographies (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Project-Class. (rev · t) WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Writing women into the encyclopedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Project-Class. (rev · t) Template:Women in Francoist Spain (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women in the Russian and Soviet military (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women in the Spanish Civil War (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Assessed List of Georgia (U.S. state) suffragists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t) Margaret Doody (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) The True Story of the Novel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Tradwife (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Removed List of Georgia suffragists (talk) removed. December 20, 2024 Reassessed Category:Abortion in the United States (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Bangladeshi feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Belgian feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Bulgarian feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Damsels in distress (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Details Cannot Body Wants (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminism books (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminism in Afghanistan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminism in Iraq (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminism in Nepal (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist artists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist literature (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist writers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Fictional female generals (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Finnish feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Infobox birth control (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Template-Class. (rev · t) Category:Iranian women judges (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Iraqi feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Rapists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Somalian feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Video games featuring female protagonists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) WP:WikiProject Feminism/Article alerts (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Project-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women's rights movement in Iran (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women computer scientists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) December 19, 2024 Reassessed Category:Abortion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Abortion-rights organisations in the Netherlands (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Abortion in the United States (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Afghan feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Emma Bugbee (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Equal rights (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Category:Estonian feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of Denmark (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of Israel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of Ukraine (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of the United States Air Force (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of the United States Marine Corps (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Portal-Class. (rev · t) Template:Feminism-stub (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Template-Class. (rev · t) Template:Feminism sidebar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Fiction about abortion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Fictional female generals (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Films about abortion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Gender feminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Disambig-Class. (rev · t) I Am Queen Mary (statue) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Category:Mahsa Amini protests (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) WP:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Project-Class. (rev · t) WP:Meetup/Black Women Intelligentsia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Project-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Rape (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Rape in India (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Rape in the United Kingdom (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Portal:Women's association football (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Portal-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women artists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Category-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women by occupation (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women in Francoist Spain (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women in the Spanish Civil War (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women in the world wars (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women in war by country (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Removed Draft:Carolyn Pethick (talk) removed. December 18, 2024 Renamed I Am Queen Mary (statue) renamed to I Am Queen Mary (statue). Reassessed Category:Abortion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Anarcha-feminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Anarcha-feminism sidebar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Anarcha-feminist collectives (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Anarcha-feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) File:Bertha Lutz 1925.jpg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from File-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:British feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Campaignbox women in warfare (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Canadian rapists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Colombian rapists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Damsels in distress (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Emma Goldman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female army generals (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Female generals of the United States Army (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminism in Sweden (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminism in Syria (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist artists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist novels (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist organizations in Syria (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist studies scholars (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist writers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Gender feminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Disambig-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Indian feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Indian women judges (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Infobox birth control (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:LGBTQ feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Mahsa Amini protests (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) WP:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Project-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Rapists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Rasan (organization) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t) Reproductive justice (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t) Template:Spanish women Civil War sidebar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Swedish feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Syrian feminists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Video games featuring female protagonists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Violence against women in Pakistan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) File:Voltairine de Cleyre (Age 35).jpg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from File-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) File:We Can Do It! NARA 535413 - Restoration 2.jpg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from File-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) WP:WikiProject Feminism/Article alerts (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Project-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Primer for AfD, AfC and PROD (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Project-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Primer for creating women's biographies (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Project-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Writing women into the encyclopedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Project-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women computer scientists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Women in Francoist Spain (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women in the Russian and Soviet military (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Women in the Spanish Civil War (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) WP:Writing about women (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Project-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Assessed Draft:Audra Kauspediene (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Draft:Caroline Crew (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Draft:Patriarchy (Graeber) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) December 17, 2024 Reassessed Disappearance of Peng Shuai (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t) Equal rights (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Disambig-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Executed Norwegian women (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Portal:Feminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Portal-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Template:Feminism-stub (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminism stubs (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Feminist art movement in the United States (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Category:Feminist eugenicists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Sex Slavery (essay) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) The Family as a Type of Society (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Category:Wikipedians interested in feminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Portal:Women's association football (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Portal-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Women artists (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) December 16, 2024 Reassessed Daniel Howell (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Removed Category:Ethiopian feminists (talk) removed. December 15, 2024 Reassessed Gender inequality in Sri Lanka (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) The Subversion of Christianity (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t) Women in Kenya (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Assessed The Family as a Type of Society (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)