User talk:Helper201

Note - I briefly set up the account User:Helper201V2 when I was having trouble logging into this account. That account only ever engaged in talk about my account and never made any edits. I did not make any edits to any pages with it and will not use it to make any edits unless otherwise stated. This is the one and only account I use.

Welcome!

Hello, Helper201! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Pirate Party UK

Hello. The accounts submitted to the EC actually have this membership figure on them. There used to be a citation on the page showing this but it has since been removed - apparently the citation isn't open to the general public yet, but it should be shortly (it's actually over-due but the snap general election has slowed down the electoral commission some what). It's a bit of a waste of time to edit the graph only to change it back in a week or two - especially when I know the information to be valid.

No body

The mention of the body does not say that she is dead. But it does connect to her late father’s wish to give her a proper Christian burial. If you are willing to accept that, pls undo previous edit. If not, pls mention in the Talk.

Thank you dear for updating Awami league page back to original

Dear, I have noticed that you edited Awami League page back to original one and I'm delighted that you have done that. Unfortunately, users like Vif12vf|,Nzs9|, and ShrewMoon| take down good edits. I strongly advice you to monitor, Awami League page. It is being vandalized by users that are putting on false information and arguing about topics that they do not understand.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 18:47 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop Nzs9 from editing

Nzs9|, is keeping on editing on Awami league page. He does it and then even has it undone. I would advice to monitor him and report him so he gets a ban from editing on Awami league page.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 14:27 20 March 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:D4B6:874C:1C1F:7A6 (talk)

Reform UK councilors

Hello, i saw you put 27 RUK councillors, this is outright false, on the source it says 28, and a further one via this email i got sent Yes, Sean Hind was elected last Thursday in the by-election for the Heanor East ward of Heanor & Loscoe Town Council. The full result is available on our website https://info.ambervalley.gov.uk/docarc/docviewer.aspx?docguid=b028c610d7484292a40d49f9cb207002 Update the page. Spookybunny8 (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Spookybunny8 this got mixed up in a prior revert. Regardless it said 29 the witch was Wong. I've now corrected it to 28. Helper201 (talk) 15:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Its 28+1, the one coming from the above link, this depends on what locak government goes down to, County? District? Town? Parish? Spookybunny8 (talk) 02:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Spookybunny8 This discussion is better suited to the article's talk page. Please discuss the matter there so others can take part. Helper201 (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

listen mate reform h=now have 29 local councillors link here to prove it. https://www.clactonandfrintongazette.co.uk/news/24653573.former-frinton-mayor-leaves-tendring-first-join-reform-uk/

also Reform uk has changed their slogan to Family, Community, Country. this was confirmed at the reform uk party conference on the 20th September 2024 if you watch the video you will see the slogan in the back ground of all speakers at the conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f37kbgiw-M0

they also have 90 thousand paid members now it was confirmed by the official social media page of the party this is from a real source.

JY-LIVE Just cite your claims using a reliable third party source. You didn't, that's why it was reverted. You changed information to what the sources provided on Reform UK's Wikipedia page did not say. Helper201 (talk) 02:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Bulgarian 2024 Elections Campaign Slogans

Hello, I saw you reverted an edit which I had made to the Bulgarian 2024 Election Campaign citing the WP:ELNO policy (which was valid). However, I had sine changed the table to exclude all external links, except to the official campaign websites of the parties. Instead, what had been done is adding the slogans of the parties without the websites, and with a reference from the parties leadership/social media which generally does NOT violate wikipedia policy, especially as pertains to political campaigns. It seems you have decided to once again remove all the slogans which had been added. In fact, it seems you even removed parts which had the official campaign websites of the parties added. Now, it can be argued that these party websites are a violation of WP:ELNO in which case the whole section should be reworked, however your arbitrary editting (which seems to have no concern for the actual content of the article or the work that editors have put in to researching the subject) is undermining any progress that can be made. Bulpoliticsedit (talk) 12:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Bulpoliticsedit We should keep to only including what reliable sources state and not use social media. If I removed anything stated by official website then that was a mistake. Helper201 (talk) 23:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Please read WP:Seealso

Specifically, "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body." This is why you are getting reverted by multiple editors. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Trainsandotherthings my apologies, I didn't see that these were already linked in the main text. Helper201 (talk) 10:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

WEP - Mention in Lead of Parish/Town Councillors

Hi.

I've re-removed the lines mentioning their town or parish level councillors from the article's lead. While it made sense and was notable enough for inclusion in the lead section (and by notable, I'm not referring to the GNG but rather the contents of the article as a whole) when that was their highest level of representation, the fact they now have a councillor elected to a principal authority effectively renders what made the mention of their town/parish councillors as justifiable to mention in the lead moot.

Rambling Rambler (talk) 19:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

It's still notable in terms of the party's overall representation, given how limited it is. Helper201 (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

It's suitable for inclusion within the article, but putting parish and town council seats in the lead when they have higher levels of representation is highly unusual, as the lead is meant to summarise the most important points. Now they have any amount of principal authority representation, the parish/town level is now not the most important level to summarise, similar to how we don't detail the number of councillors in the lead for parties with MPs. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)