Liquid Rocket Propellants PDF

P1: GPJ Final Pages Qu: 00, 00, 00, 00
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN008B-385 June 29, 2001 15:26
Liquid Rocket Propellants

Forrest S. Forbes Peter A. Van Splinter
Engineering Consultant General Physics Corporation
I. Desirable Liquid Propellant Characteristics

II. Liquid Rocket Propellant Performance
III. Liquid Rocket Propellant Selection
IV. Handling and Storage of Liquid Rocket
Propellants
GLOSSARY associated number represents the NO percentage by

weight (e.g., MON-15 contains 15% NO).
Anhydrous Containing no water. In a practical sense, Monopropellant Single substance that may be a single
refers to propellants that have a moisture content below compound, or a mixture of several materials that are
a specified limit. stable under normal conditions, that will combust or de-
Bipropellant Two separate propellants, a fuel and an ox- compose yielding hot gases when ignited or catalyzed.
idizer. They are fed individually to a thrust chamber Neat Liquid propellant composed of only one chemical.
where mixing and combustion occurs. Neat hydrazine is only pure N2 H4 within the specifica-
Cryogenic Liquefied gases that must be refrigerated to tions for purity.
be kept in an liquid state at atmospheric pressure. No Outage Volume of propellant that still remains in the tank
amount of pressure will liquefy gases that are above after all usable amounts have been expelled. Volume is
their critical temperature. An arbitrary temperature of retained to assure that the engine is not fed slugs of
−240◦ F (122 K) is sometimes used to define the upper pressurizing gas instead of pure propellant.
limit of the critical temperature of cryogenic gases. Passivation Process to render metal and plastic surfaces
Hypergolic Self-igniting. In the context of rocket propul- nonreactive with the propellant.
sion, pertains to fuels and oxidizers that self-ignite Prepackaged Rocket system that is loaded and sealed
within about 75 milliseconds after contact with each with storable propellants at the manufacturing plant,
other. thus requiring no servicing of propellants in the
MAF Mixed amine fuel. A fuel consisting of mixed field.
amine, usually hydrazine in order to reduce the freezing Propellant Fuels, oxidizers, and monopropellants used
point. to provide energy and the working fluid for the thrust
MHF Mixed hydrazine fuel. A special case of MAF of a rocket engine.
where only hydrazines are contained. Pyrophoric Spontaneously ignitable in air.
MON Mixed oxides of nitrogen. An oxidizer consisting Space storable Ability to be used in a space environ-
of nitrogen tetroxide (N2 O4 ) and nitric oxide (NO). An ment for extended periods without boil-off, freezing,
741
P1: GPJ Final Pages
742 Liquid Rocket Propellants
or decomposition. Usually refers to propellants that are candidates results from the need to make difficult trade-
mildly cryogenic or have high vapor pressure on earth, offs among performance, storability, physical character-
but because of low ambient temperatures in space they istics, handling, safety, cost, and availability. All these
can be kept liquid under a modest vapor pressure. Ex- parameters are considerations of specific applications and
amples are ammonia, oxygen difluoride, diborane, and the degree of importance can vary greatly. A large variety
dinitrogen tetrafluoride. of liquid fuels, oxidizers, and monopropellants have been
Storable Propellants that exhibit no corrosion, decom- evaluated, some of which are in operational use and others
position, or deterioration over a specified time period, that have fallen to the wayside for various reasons.
usually 5–10 years, with 20 years becoming a require- Synthesis programs have been undertaken to produce
ment for some satellites. A low freezing point is often new compounds that, theoretically at least, appeared to
required, as low as −65◦ F (220 K) for tactical mis- have desirable characteristics. Propellant mixtures have
siles, but as high as 30◦ F (272 K) for the Titan II. been formulated in efforts to tailor properties to meet
The upper temperature range can also vary, from 90◦ F specific requirements. Propellants are reactive and ener-
(305 K) for an environmentally controlled system to getic materials by nature. Through an understanding of
160◦ F (344 K) for tactical missiles. The term storable the chemical and physical properties, proper selection of
is often applied to a propellant combination of fuel and materials and components, and use of appropriate proce-
oxidizer. While kerosine is storable, it is usually used dures and equipment, liquid rocket propellants can be used
with liquefied oxygen, thus the kerosine/oxygen sys- safely and effectively.
tem is not storable.
Threshold limit values (TLV) As established by the
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hy- I. DESIRABLE LIQUID PROPELLANT
gienists, the time-weighed average concentration of a CHARACTERISTICS
toxicant to which an average healthy person may be
repeatedly exposed for a normal 8-hr day and a 40-hr The primary consideration for propellant selection is high
workweek without suffering adverse effects. TLV-C is performance coupled with low system weight. In addition,
the concentration that should never be exceeded. the physical and chemical characteristics of the propellants
Ullage Volume of a full tank of propellant that is not actu- must meet the requirements of the expected operational
ally occupied by liquid propellant. The empty volume environment of the propulsion system. The need for in-
allows thermal expansion of the liquid and provides an stant readiness by the military imposes demands for long-
initial volume for pressurization gas. term storability and ease of handling. With the greater use
of rocket propulsion for civilian purposes, these consid-
erations are less important. Following are the principle
LIQUID ROCKET PROPELLANTS provide the energy factors.
or motive power for chemical rocket propelled systems CHEMICAL ENERGY. Since propulsive energy is pro-
by releasing chemical energy through a combustion produced in the form of hot gases, optimized performance re-
cess. The propellants also furnish the working fluid that sults from maximizing the flame temperature and volume
is expanded by the release of the thermal energy. Besides of gases produced per unit weight of the reactants. A low
producing thrust for prime propulsion or attitude control, molecular weight of the exit gases is desired.
propellants are often burned in gas generators to drive tur- LIQUID RANGE. The operational environment of the
bopumps, hydraulic pumps, and alternators. Propellants missile or spacecraft dictates the freezing and boiling
are also used to generate gases in underwater flotation point requirements. Military tactical weapons often re-
devices, and as the energy source for gas dynamic lasers. quire a temperature range of −65–160◦ F (219.3–344.4 K)
The term liquid rocket propellants encompasses the for worldwide deployment. Silo-based missiles and satel-
fuels and oxidizers used in bipropellant systems, and lites may experience a much narrower range. Low-boiling
single fluid monopropellants. Tripropellant combinations propellants require heavyweight tanks or some means to
have also been studied where one component may be a keep the propellants cold. The high vapor pressure compli-
solid. Hybrids are bipropellant systems that have one liq- cates the design of pump and regeneratively cooled thrust
uid component, usually the oxidizer with the fuel being a chambers. Special handling procedures and equipment are
solid grain. So called reverse hybrids have liquid fuel and a needed for servicing cryogenic systems. The freezing and
solid oxidizer grain. Heterogeneous propellants consist of boiling points of various propellants are listed in Tables I
finely powdered energetic materials suspended in a liquid and II. Vapor pressures of selected oxidizers and fuels are
medium thickened to inhibit settling of the solid particles. plotted in Figs. 1 and 2.
Propellant selection is based on many factors. The ideal STABILITY. Propellants should be storable for the re-
propellant does not exist: the large number of propellant quired time period without decomposition, gas formation,
P1: GPJ Final Pages
Liquid Rocket Propellants 743
TABLE I Physical Properties of Liquid Oxidizers

Freezing point Normal boiling point a
Molecular
Oxidizer (formula) weight ◦F K ◦F K Specific gravity
Bromine pentafluoride (Br F5 ) 174.9 −78.3 211.8 104.9 313.6 2.47 @ 298 K
Chlorine pentafluoride (ClF5 ) 130.4 −153.4 170.2 7.3 259.4 1.78 @ 298 K
Chlorine trifluoride (ClF3 ) 92.4 −107.1 195.9 53.2 284.9 1.81 @ 298 K
Florox (CIF3 O) 108.4 −86.8 207.1 84.7 302.6 1.85 @ 298 K
Fluorine (F2 ) 38.0 −362.3 54.1 −306.6 85.0 1.50 @ NBP
Fluorine/Oxygen (Flox) 36.2 — −304 86.5 1.24 @ NBP
(70% F2 /30% O2 )
Hydrogen peroxide 32.4 11.3 261.6 286.1 414.3 1.39 @ 293 K
(90 % H2 O2 /(10% H2 O)
Hydrogen peroxide 34.0 31.2 272.7 302.4 423.4 1.45 @ 293 K
(98% H2 O2 )
MON-10 (10% NO/90% N2 O4 ) 85.8 −9 250.4 50.8 283.6 1.47 @ 273 K
Nitric acid-type IIIAc 59.4 −56 224.3 140 333b 1.55 @ 298 K
Nitric acid-type IVc 55.0 −35 235.9 76.5 297.9b 1.62 @ 298 K
Nitrogen tetroxide (N2 O4 ) 92.0 11.8 261.9 70.1 294.3 1.43 @ 293 K
Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3 ) 71.0 −341 65.9 −201 143.7 1.54 @ NBP
Oxygen (O2 ) 32.0 −361.1 54.7 −297.3 90.2 1.15 @ NBP
Oxygen difluoride (OF2 ) 54.0 −371 49.3 −228.6 128.4 1.52 @ NBP
Ozone (O3 ) 48.0 −316 79.8 −170 160.9 1.61 @ 78 K
Perchloryl fluoride (ClO3 F) 102.4 −231 127 −52.3 226.3 1.39 @ 298 K
Tetrafluorohydrazine (N2 F4 ) 104.0 −261.4 110.2 −99.4 200.2 1.56 @173 K
a NBP is normal boiling point at 1 atm.
b Bubble point, where liquid appears to boil.
c See Table X for nitric acid compositions.
or attack on the container material. Decomposition or injector, permitting a smaller pump or a lightweight pres-
residue formation at high temperatures can adversely af- surization system to be used.
fect regenerative cooling. Propellants should also be sta- IGNITION. Hypergolic ignition offers high reliability, a
ble to mechanical and hydrodynamic shock and adiabatic restart capability for multiburn missions and eliminates the
compression. weight of a separate ignition system. In space, secondary
REACTIVITY. Mild corrosion of tanks and compo- ignition sources are unreliable. Catalytic decomposition
nents and deterioration of seals and gaskets can result of monopropellants is a valuable attribute.
in propellant contamination and clogging of filters and LOGISTICS. While low-cost propellants are desirable,
small passages. Reactivity with moisture and air invokes they are usually a small part of the overall system cost.
the need for unique transfer techniques. Spills and leaks of The costs of special handling and storage, as in the case of
reactive propellants are safety hazards; benign propellants cryogens, must be considered part of the total propellant
are easily and safely handled with a minimum of special cost. Propellant costs are a function of the production rate.
equipment. A reactive fuel and oxidizer combination is Availability of propellant for a new or expanded program
needed for smooth and efficient combustion. may involve construction of a new plant or expanding
DENSITY. High propellant density allows the use of an existing one. The required transportation equipment is
smaller tanks, thus minimizing the overall vehicle inert another factor.
weight (improves the mass fraction). A propellant with
low coefficient of expansion can be used over a larger por-
II. LIQUID ROCKET PROPELLANT
tion of its liquid range without undue performance vari-
PERFORMANCE
ation. The specific gravities of common propellants are
presented in Tables I and II and as a function of tempera-
A. General Principles
ture in Fig. 3.
VISCOSITY. Low viscosity fluids will have less pres- It is helpful to explore the governing equations for rocket
sure drop through the feed system and thrust chamber engines in order to understand the motivation of rocket
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE II Physical Properties of Liquid Fuels

Freezing point Normal boiling point
Molecular Specific
Fuel (formula) weight ◦F K ◦F K gravity
Aerozine-50 (50% Hydrazine/50% UDMHa ) 41.8 22 267.6 158 343.15 0.899 @ 298 K
Ammonia (NH3 ) 17.0 −107.9 195.4 −28.05 239.8 0.682 @ NBP
Aniline (C6 H5 –NH2 ) 93.12 207.4 266.8 363.9 457.5 0.999 @ 293 K
Diborane (B2 H6 ) 27.69 −264.8 108.3 −134.5 180.6 0.438 @ NBP
Diethylcyclohexane [(C2 H5 )2 C6 H10 ] 140.3 −110.2 194.2 345 447.2 0.804 @ 293 K
Diethylenetriamine (DETA) [(NH2 C2 H4 )2 NH] 103.2 −38.2 234 405 480 0.953 @ 298 K
u-Dimethyl hydrazine (UDMH) [CH3 )2 N2 H2 ] 60.1 −70.9 216.0 144.2 335.5 0.791 @ 298 K
Ethane (C2 H6 ) 30.07 −297.9 89.95 −127.6 184.48 0.548 @ NBP
Ethanol (C2 H5 OH) 46.1 −174 158.7 172.9 351.4 0.789 @ 293 K
Ethene (C2 H4 ) 28.054 −273.1 103.6 154.66 169.4 0.5674 @ NBP
Ethylene dihydrazine (C2 H10 N4 ) 90.1 55.4 285.95 >491.e >528.e 1.096 @ 298 K
Ethylene oxide (C2 H4 O) 44.01 −168 162 50.9 283.6 0.887 @ NBP
Furfuryl alcohol (C5 H5 OOH) 98.1 −26 240 340 444 1.13 @ 293 K
Hybaline A-5 109.2 −58 223.2 505 536 0.736 @ 293 K
Hydrazine (N2 H4 ) 32.04 34.75 274.7 236.3 386.6 1.008 @ 293 K
Hydrogen (H2 ) 2.016 −434.8 13.8 −423.3 20.21 0.0709 @ NBP
JP-X (40% UDMH/60% JP-4)a 89.3 <−71 216 211 373 0.80 @ 293 K
Kerosine (RP-1) (H/C = 2.0) 172 <−50 228 350–525 450–547 0.80–0.81
450–547 @ 293 K
Methane (CH4 ) 16.04 −296.5 90.6 −258.7 111.6 0.451 @ NBP
Methanol (CH3 OH) 32.04 −144 175.4 147 337 0.791 @ 293 K
MAF-1b 100.0 −148 173 170 350 0.87 @ 298 K
MAF-3b 90.2 <−65 219 — 0.917 @ 298 K
MHF-3c (86% MMH/14% N2 H4 )a 43.41 <−65 219 193.4 362.8 0.889 @ 298 K
MHF-5c 45.35 −43.6 231.2 205.8 369.7 1.011 @ 298 K
Monomethyl hydrazine (CH3 H2 H3 ) 46.07 −62.3 220.8 189.8 360.8 0.879 @ 293 K
Nitromethane (CH3 NO2 ) 61.04 −20.2 244.1 214 374.3 1.135 @ 298 K
Pentaborane (B5 H9 ) 63.17 −52.2 226.4 140.1 333.2 0.623 @ 298 K
n-Propyl nitrate (C3 H7 NO3 ) 105.1 <−150 172 230.9 383.6 1.058 @ 298 K
Otto Fuel IId 186.52 −18.4 245.2 decomposes 1.232 @ 298 K
Propane (C3 H8 ) 44.11 −305.84 85.5 −43.7 231.1 0.5853 @ NBP
Quadricyclane (C7 H8 ) 92.14 226.4 381 0.982
Shelldyne-H 186.7 −101 200 460 511 1.11 @ 293 K
U-DETA (MAF-4, Hydyne) 72.15 <−120 188.7 161 345 0.858 @ 289 K
(60% UDMH/40% DETA)a
a Weight percent.
b See Table XII for composition.
c See Table XIII for composition.
d See Table XV for composition.
e Estimated values courtesy of GenCorp Aerojet Tech Systems.
engineers to create and use cryogenic, toxic, and explo- ter or air masses which are accelerated toward the
sive compounds in the pursuit of rocket-powered vehi- rear.”
cles with minimum weight or minimum volume (or both). Therefore, accelerating a working fluid out the rear of
Liquid rockets are reaction engines derived from New- a vehicle produces thrust. The working fluid can be cold
ton’s Laws. Saenger described the momentum princi- gas, monopropellant decomposition products, bipropel-
ple with these words, “. . . all ship propellers, airplane lant combustion products, or molecules that have been
propellers, water wheels, and oars generate their for- heated by an electrical, solar or nuclear energy source.
ward push at the expense of the momentum of wa- The thrust of a liquid propellant rocket derives primarily
P1: GPJ Final Pages
FIGURE 1 Vapor pressure of liquid oxidizers.
from a high velocity of exhaust products exiting the engine Pa is the pressure in the surroundings of the free body
at the exit plane. (lb/ft2 , Pascals)
A simple party balloon inflated with air illustrates all Ae is the area of the exit of the nozzle (ft2 , m2 )
these principles. The energy source is the elastic energy
of the stretched rubber. The working fluid is the air en- From 90 to 100% of the thrust is contributed by the first
closed within the inflated balloon. The exhaust nozzle is term, and the term may be called velocity thrust or mo-
the hole where the air can escape. At the exit plane of the mentum thrust. In this term it can be seen that the higher
balloon, the air is flowing at a higher velocity than the the flow rate, the higher the thrust, and the higher the exit
bulk of air still remaining in the balloon. The applicable velocity, the higher the thrust. For a fixed flow rate of
Newton’s Law is that the time rate of change in momen- working fluid, this equation shows why rocket engineers
tum will be proportional to the net external force. This attempt to maximize thrust per unit flow rate by maximiz-
is the first equation, the classic equation for thrust of a ing exit velocity.
rocket. The second term of the thrust equation commonly con-
tributes 0–10% to the thrust and is called “pressure thrust.”
F = mV e + (Pe − Pa )Ae (1)
Pressure thrust is greatly dependent upon the pressure
Where: environment surrounding the free body. For instance, at
liftoff, the pressure thrust of the Space Shuttle Main En-
m is mass flow rate of working fluid (lb/sec, Kg/s) gine (SSME) is actually negative since Pa exceeds Pe at
Ve is velocity of the working fluid where it exits the sea level. In space vacuum, where Pa is practically zero,
free body (ft/sec, m/s) the pressure thrust of the SSME contributes on the order
Pe is the pressure of the working fluid at the place the of 10% to the thrust. For a vehicle operating at constant al-
working fluid exits the free body (lb/ft2 , Pascals) titude, arranging so that Pe = Pa results in what is defined
P1: GPJ Final Pages
FIGURE 2 Vapor pressure of liquid fuels.
as optimum expansion ratio where pressure thrust is de- A propellant combination with higher specific impulse
liberately set to be zero. Allowing Pe to be greater than Pa will result in either a lighter vehicle for a fixed payload
may be thought of as wasted energy that could have been or more payload for a fixed weight of vehicle. For mis-
converted to more thrust at the same flow rate of propellant siles the trade might be range and payload. The lighter the
Thrust per unit flow rate is defined as specific impulse vehicle, the easier and cheaper it might be to construct,
(Isp ) transport, and handle. Furthermore, lighter may mean less
Isp = F/m (2) raw material of construction that might translate to lower
cost. Vehicle designers tend to choose the highest specific
Specific impulse is the conventional parameter for theoret- impulse propellant combination, if all other characteris-
ical comparison of various propellants and for assessment tics are equal or at least acceptable. Of course, all other
of the efficiency of actual delivered rocket engine perfor- characteristics are never equal, so for different kinds of ve-
mance compared the the theoretical. hicles, different propellant combinations provide the best
In the English units, m is the weight flow rate in pounds compromise.
per second. Since the thrust is in pounds, this leaves the Returning to Eq. 1, dividing by m and arranging for
unit of specific impulse to be seconds. For a more physical optimum expansion ratio (Pe = Pa ) the following results:
definition, specific impulse must be thought of as pounds
of force per pound per second of propellant flow. In any F/m = V = c (3)
units, the higher the value of specific impulse, the higher This velocity that remains on the right side of the equation
the specific performance of the rocket. In the MKS system can be interpreted as the actual physical velocity of the
of units, if thrust is in newtons and mass flow rate is in working fluid relative to the rocket vehicle. This velocity
kilograms per second, the units of specific impulse will is defined as effective exhaust velocity and is commonly
reduce to meters per second. assigned the letter c. Note that effective exhaust velocity
P1: GPJ Final Pages
FIGURE 3 Specific gravities of liquid rocket propellants.
in the metric system is also the specific impulse value in MW is the molecular weight of the working fluid
the metric system for optimum expansion ratio. When a Tc is the absolute temperature of the working fluid at
rocket is reported to have a specific impulse of 1000 m/sec, the entrance of the nozzle
it means that the velocity of gases exiting the nozzle is Pe is the pressure of the working fluid at the exit of
1000 m/sec relative to the nozzle. the nozzle
In the air-filled party balloon, the air is a compressible Pc is the pressure of the working fluid at the entrance
fluid being accelerated out of an exit hole. For a rocket of the nozzle
engine, the exit hole is the exit plane of a converging-
diverging supersonic nozzle. From the principles of ther- Approximately, Pc and Tc are the pressure and temper-
modynamics and fluid mechanics, an equation can be ature of the working fluid in the combustion chamber.
derived using conservation of energy, perfect gas, and a From Eq. 4 several of the driving factors for propel-
concept called a reversible adiabatic flow. Without the de- lant selection can be recognized. To maximize Ve which
tails of a derivation, the velocity out of the exit of a nozzle maximizes thrust, the desirable factors are
is written as:

k−1
k R P 1. The lowest value of k
Ve =
k
e
2g Tc 1 − (4) 2. The lowest value of molecular weight
k − 1 MW Pc
3. The highest value of Tc
Where: 4. The highest value of Pc
Ve is exit velocity of the working fluid The value of k varies from 1.28 for helium to 1.66 for
k is the ratio of specific heats of the working fluid carbon dioxide. Air, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen are
g is the gravitational constant 1.4. This value is not really selectable, however, the lowest
R is the universal gas constant molecular weight gases also tend to have the lowest k.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
The lowest molecular weight is 2.02 for hydrogen. Here Pc At C f

Isp = (6)
is the driver for the selection of liquid hydrogen, hydrides, m
and all other fuels packed with as many hydrogen atoms A new term can be defined by collecting all the vari-
as science can achieve. Carrying along nitrogen, oxygen, ables except thrust coefficient. That new variable is de-
and carbon compounds in the exhaust increases the mix- fined as the characteristic exhaust velocity, called c∗ and
ture molecular weight and penalizes Ve. If the source of pronounced “see star.” Physically, it may be thought of
heat energy is from a solar concentrator, a nuclear reactor, as the velocity of the working fluid at the throat of the
or electrical energy, the working fluid can be pure hy- converging-diverging nozzle.
drogen. However, when the source of energy is chemical Pc At
decomposition or combustion, this increased molecular c∗ = (7)
m
weight of the working fluid is unavoidable.
Replacing Eq. 7 in Eq. 6 shows an interesting relationship
For a chemical rocket, energy released in the combus-
for Isp :
tion chamber heats the working fluid to very high tempera-
tures. Maximum combustion chamber temperature yields Isp = c∗ C f (8)
maximun exit velocity. Here is the driver for selection of Again, the performance of the nozzle has been separated
oxidizers of legendary reactivity in an attempt to run Tc as from the performance of the chamber. In this way, c∗ is
high as possible while minimizing melting all the parts of representative of the combustion properties of the propel-
the rocket. Some of the highest heat releases stem from the lants used in the rocketwhile C f is representative of the
oxidation of metals. This is the driver for including metal- nozzle.
lic aluminum or even beryllium as part of the combustion Tests can be run at atmospheric pressure without the
process. trouble of measuring thrust in order to optimize mixture
High chamber pressure, Pc , is a factor that could allow ratio of a bipropellant or to evaluate the survivability of
enormous expansion ratios that still result in Pe greater the hardware to the effects of high Pc and Tc . It is much
than Pa . When Pe is greater then Pa , it might be considered easier and faster to accurately measure Pc of prototype,
a loss of opportunity to convert that extra pressure to extra heavyweight rocket hardware than it is to measure thrust.
exhaust velocity. Throwing away the extra exit pressure As a result, the first measure of how well an injector per-
means that specific impulse could have been higher. forms is nearly always c∗ efficiency which is measured c∗
To summarize, the vehicle designer wants the lowest compared to theoretical c∗ .
molecular weight exhaust, the highest combustion tem- The above relationships will predict or measure the per-
perature, and the highest chamber pressure that the the formance of rocket engines within 10%. Of course, the real
mission requires or the sponsor is willing to pay for, and world will impose the effect of real gases, three dimen-
it is all caused by the relationship of Eq. 4. sions, and various other losses on the process of devel-
Returning to Eq. 1, if mass flow is replaced by the con- opment, but the basic selection and evaluation parameters
tinuity equation, velocity is replaced by Eq. 4, the perfect for propellant definition have been defined.
gas equation of state is applied, and variables are mathe-
matically manipulated, the thrust equation becomes:
B. Theoretical Calculations
F = Pc At C f (5) Specific impulse is also defined from the total enthalpy
change of the propulsion system between the combustion
where Pc is combustion chamber pressure, At is the area chamber and the nozzle exit:
of throat of the converging-diverging supersonic nozzle,
Isp = 2J (Hc − He )/g (9)
and C f is a complicated term involving k, Pc, and Pe and
is called the thrust coefficient. where Hc is enthalpy of combustion products before ex-
Equation 5 is an interesting way of arriving at rocket pansion, Btu/lbm (J/kg), He enthalpy of combustion prod-
thrust because it separates the pressure thrust (pressure ucts after expansion, Btu/lbm (J/kg), and J mechanical
times area) of the rocket chamber from the contribution of equivalent of heat 778 ft lbm/Btu (0.101988 kg m/J). Two
the converging-diverging supersonic nozzle. All the messy sets of conditions are considered when making perfor-
methematics is in C f . Values of C f vary from approxi- mance calculations, those of the combustion chamber and
mately 1.0 to a maximum theoretical value of 1.964 for those of the expansion nozzle.
infinite ratio of Pa /Pe . So the thrust of an actual rocket is
somewhere between 100 and 200% of the pressure thrust,
1. Combustion Chamber
depending upon the nozzle expansion ratio.
If F is replaced by Eq. 5 in the definition of specific The conditions of the propellant entering into the combus-
impulse (Eq. 2), then: tion chamber (composition, temperature, physical state,
P1: GPJ Final Pages
and mixture ratio) and the chamber pressure are used to 298 K), H ◦ - H0◦ molar enthalpy (from tables), Hf◦ heat
calculate the chamber temperature and hot gas reaction, of formation, n i moles of reactants (propellants), and n j
product composition, and properties. This information de- moles of reaction products. To obtain values for the un-
fines the nozzle inlet conditions that allow calculation of knowns, Tc and n j , the equations are solved simultane-
Isp and C ∗ and provides information needed for engine ously with a digital computer using thermochemical and
design, estimates of heat transfer, and nozzle flow and ex- equilibria data from references such as the JANAF Ther-
pansion parameters. The combustion process is assumed mochemical Tables and the National Bureau of Standards
to be adiabatic and proceeds to completion. Circulars. These tabulations cover heat capacity, enthalpy,
Chamber (flame) temperature, Tc , and gas composition entropy, free energy function, heat and free energy of
are calculated using mass, pressure and energy balance formation, and equilibrium constants of formation over
equations, and chemical equilibria data. the range of 0–6000 K, as appropriate. Heats of forma-
The energy equation does not provide a direct solution tion of selected propellants are presented in Tables III
of the chamber temperature. When the enthalpy of the and IV.
reaction products above a standard reference tempera-
ture equals the heat of reaction of the entering propellant,
the adiabatic combustion temperature is defined. For ma- 2. Expansion Nozzle
chine computation, enthalpy values of the products are In the nozzle, the combustion gases are expanded isen-
represented as a power series in terms of the temperature. tropically, converting sensible enthalpy into kinetic en-
The general energy equation is ergy accompanied by a drop in temperature and pressure.

When the gas composition does not change (no chemical
n i HT ◦c − H0◦ − HT◦0 − H0◦ + Hf◦ T 0 i
i,propellant
dissociation, recombination, or condensation) from the

chamber to the nozzle exit plane, the process is consid-
= nj HT◦i − H0◦ − HT◦0 − H0◦ ered to be in frozen equilibrium. If chemical and phase
j,reaction products equilibrium among all combustion species is maintained
under the varying pressure and temperature conditions of
+ (Hf δ)T0 j
(10)
the nozzle expansion process, the product composition
where Tc is adiabatic flame combustion temperature, Ti will change. This is known as shifting equilibrium, and
propellant temperature, T0 reference temperature (usually performance so calculated will bethe higher value because
TABLE III Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid Oxidizers

Critical Heat of
Heat of temperature Critical pressure vaporization
formation
Oxidizer (kJ/mol)a ◦F K psia MN/m2 Btu/lb kJ/mol
Bromine pentafluoride (BrF5 ) −548.94 388 471 669 4.612 74.1 30.12
Chlorine pentafluoride (ClF5 ) −253.13 289.4 416.2 771 5.316 73.3 22.22
Chlorine trifluoride (ClF3 ) −185.77 355 453 961 6.626 128.0 27.53
Florox (ClF3 O) −165.69 360 455 — 127.9 32.22
Fluorine (F2 ) −12.96 −199.6 144.5 809.7 5.583 71.5 6.32
Fluorine/oxygen (70/30) (FLOX) −36.04 −199.6 144.5 809.7 5.583 77 6.48
Hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) −187.78 855 730 3130 21.58 596 47.07
Nitric acid-Type IIIAb −140.16 520 544 1286 8.867 247 34.10
Nitric acid-Type IVb −181.59 512 540 1428 9.846 270 34.52
Nitrogen tetroxide (N2 O4 ) −19.58 316.8 431.4 1441 9.938 178.2 38.12
Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3 ) −131.50g −88 206.5 729 5.026 73.0 11.59
Oxygen (O2 ) −12.12 −181.1 154.8 730.6 5.375 91.6 6.82
Oxygen difluoride (OF2 ) +24.52 −72 215.4 719 4.958 88.7 11.13
Ozone (O3 ) +118.41 9.6 260.7 803 5.537 127.9 14.27
Perchloryl fluoride (ClO3 F) −21.42 203 368 779 5.372 83.9 19.96
Tetrafluorohydrazine (N2 F4 ) −21.8 96.8 309 1130 7.8 64.2 15.23
a Liquid state at 298.16 K. To obtain Kcal/mol divide kJ/mol by 4.184.
b See Table X for nitric acid compositions.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE IV Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid Fuels

Critical Critical Heat of
Heat of temperature pressure vaporization
formation
Fuel (formula) (kJ/mol)a ◦F K psia MN/m2 Btu/lb kJ/mol
Aerozine-50 (50% hydrazine/50% UDMH)b +51.51 633 607 1731 11.935 346.5 33.67
Ammonia (NH3 ) −71.71 270.1 405.4 1636 11.280 596.2 23.56
Aniline (C6 H5 –NH2 ) +30.71 798 698.6 771 5.316 203 43.93
Diborane (B2 H6 ) +20.79 62.1 289.8 581 4.006 224.3 14.43
Diethylcyclohexane [(C2 H5 )2 C6 H10 ] −726.18 690 638.6 367.5 2.534 119 38.79
Diethylenetriamine (DETA) [(NH2 C2 H4 )2 NH] −77.40 433.9 496 538 3.710 210.5 50.50
u-Dimethyl hydrazine (UDMH) [(CH3 )2 N2 H2 ] +51.63 482 523 867 5.978 250.6 35.02
Ethane (C2 H6 ) −25.26 90.1 305.45 708.5 4.885 210.0 14.67
Ethanol (C2 H5 OH) −277.65 469.4 516 925 6.378 362 38.79
Ethene (C2 H4 ) 8.1 49.82 282.7 742.35 5.118 207.5 13.55
Ethylene dihydrazine (C2 H10 N4 ) 137.7 901. f 746. f 838. f 5.8 f 367.7 f 77.0 f
Ethylene oxide (C2 H4 O) +25.15 384.4 468.9 1043 7.191 249 25.48
Furfuryl alcohol (C5 H5 OOH) −276.35 570 f 572 f 515 f 3.5 f 235.2 53.62
Hybaline A-5 +46.02 662–932 623–773 — 82.26 20.88
Hydrazine (N2 H4 ) +50.42 716 653 2131 14.693 583 43.43
Hydrogen (H2 ) −9.01 −399.9 33.21 188 1.296 195.3 0.915
JP-X (40% UDMH/60% JP-4)b +4.90 545 558 680 4.689 169 35.06
Kerosine (RP-1) (H/C = 2.0) −26.03 758 676.5 315 2.172 125 49.79
Methane (CH4 ) −89.50 −115.8 191.0 673 4.64 238.9 8.91
Methanol (CH3 OH) −239.03 464 513 1142 7.87 526.8 39.32
MAF-1c −77.82 — — 246 56.90
MAF-3c −38.66 — — —
MHF-3d (86% MMH/14% N2 H4 )b +54.00 617 598 1373 9.467 370.2 37.38
MHF-5d +28.75 685 636 1470 10.14 324.2 34.18
Monomethyl hydrazine (MMH) (CH3 N2 H3 ) +54.84 594 585 1195 8.24 377 40.38
Nitromethane (CH3 NO2 ) −139.03 598.6 587.9 916 6.314 269.8 38.28
Pentaborane (B5 H9 ) +32.38 435 497 557 3.84 219 32.17
n-Propyl nitrate (C3 H7 NO3 ) −214.47 584.6 580 588 4.05 142 34.68
Otto Fuel IIe −410.16 (decomposes) —
Propane (C3 H8 ) −30.372 206.2 369.93 617.4 4.257 183.2 18.78
Shelldyne-H (RJ-5) +136.82 985 803 510 3.52 191 82.88
U-DETA (MAF-4, Hydyne) (60% UDMH/ +16.44 558 565.4 805 5.55 191 32.01
40% DETA)b
a Liquid state at 298.16 K. To obtain Kcal/mol divide kJ/mol by 4.184.
b Weight percent.
c See Table XII for composition.
d See Table XIII for composition.
e See Table XV for composition.
f Estimated values courtesy of GenCorp Aerojet TechSystems.
the dissociated species that recombine in the nozzle add zle friction, and divergence angle may play a significant
to the release of chemical energy converted into kinetic role.
energy. The frozen and shifting equilibrium represent To perform frozen equilibrium calculations, the exit
the high and low limits of performance due to nozzle temperature, Te , is determined by considering the conser-
chemistry attainable from the system. In practice, actual vation of entropy (an isentropic process). The gas compo-
rocket performance usually falls in between the two. Other sition throughout the nozzle is the same as in the chamber,
losses, such as incomplete combustion, heat loss, noz- thus the entropy in the chamber and at the nozzle exit are
P1: GPJ Final Pages
equal. The difference between frozen and shifting flow condensed species are present, and for friction and heat
values occurs because the species mole fractions are transfer losses. Also, for an equilibrium flow system in
known for the former and unknown for the latter, which which the nozzle species and average molecular weight
makes the latter an iterative process similar in complexity are changing, the optimum nozzle area ratio for a given
to the chamber solution. Usually when making a frozen exit pressure can be calculated.
flow calculation an additional simplifying assumption is A familiar expression of specific impulse can be derived
made: that the heat capacity is constant with temperature. from Eqs. 9 and 15 and H = Cp T :
This leads to a simple expression for the effect of temper-
k −1
ature on entropy: k 2RTc Pe k
Isp = 1− (17)
S = Cp ln(T2 /T1 ) (11) k − 1 gm Pc
This entropy change is set equal and opposite to the change where k is the ratio of specific heats (Cp /Cv ), Pe exit
due to the pressure drop: pressure, Pc chamber pressure, Tc chamber temperature,
R universal gas constant, and M average molecular weight
S = −R ln(T2 /T1 ) (12)
of combustion products. As noted in Eq. 17 Isp varies
leading to the familiar isentropic relationship: directly with the square root of the chamber temperature
ln(T2 /T1 ) = R /Cp ln(P2 /P1 ) = (k − 1)/k ln(P2 /P1 ) and inversely with the square root of the average molecular
(13) weight of the exhaust products, thus the ratio (Tc /M)1/2
where is used as a rough figure of merit to compare propellants.
The theoretical performance of selected liquid propel-
k = Cp /Cv = Cp /(Cp − R) (14) lant systems is presented in Tables V–IX.
Perhaps a yet more familiar form is:
T2 /T1 = (P2 /P1 )(k −1)/k (15) III. LIQUID ROCKET PROPELLANT
For a selected exit pressure, the exhaust gas temperature SELECTION
can now be calculated. The change in enthalpy leads to
the calculation of the specific impulse by Eq. 9. The best oxidizer performance is provided by the el-
In shifting equilibrium calculations, the gas composi- ements O and F. Unfortunately, their molecular forms,
tion changes as it transverses from the chamber through O2 and F2 , are cryogenic. The elements Cl and Br will
the nozzle to the exit plane. As the temperature and pres- give oxidizers better physical properties, but their high
sure drops, many of the dissociated species recombine molecular weight makes them less attractive from a per-
which change the gas composition and release additional formance standpoint. Nitrogen serves as a “back-bone”
energy. The mass balance, pressure balance, and chemi- to carry O and F in a number of oxidizers, but adds lit-
cal equilibrium must be satisfied as described previously tle to the overall performance. Although hydrogen is a
for the chamber conditions, and the exit temperature, Te , fuel, it is an excellent working fluid because of its low
calculated. However, instead of the energy balance Eq. 10 molecular weight; thus, it is a desirable component in
an expression of entropy conservation is used to solve for some oxidizers. From these elements, the following ox-
the exit temperature and the exhaust composition: idizers are obtained: O3 , F2 , OF2 , NF3 , O2 , N2 F4 , ClF5 ,

ClO3 F, ClF3 O, ClF3 , N2 O4 , H2 O2 , HNO3 . This listing is
n k STe − R ln p k = n j STc − R ln p j from the highest performance to the lowest using hydrogen
k,exhaust j,chamber
as the fuel. (With another fuel, some reordering may oc-
(16)
cur.) The first five oxidizers are the highest energy and are
where Te is exhaust temperature at exist plane, Tc cham- cryogens.
ber temperature, STc absolute molar entropy of species The number of elements that can be considered as fuels
j at chamber temperature and 1 atm, STe absolute molar or fuel components is limited. Based on heat release, or
entropy of species k at exit temperature and 1 atm, R gas heat of combustion, the elements H, Li, Be, B, C, Mg, and
constant, n k number of moles of species k at nozzle exit, n j Al can be considered. As in the case with oxidizers, ni-
number of moles of species j from chamber, and pj,k partial trogen will contribute little to the heat of combustion but
pressures (atm) of components. From the temperature and serves as a desirable building block, especially for hold-
product composition, one can calculate the enthalpy drop ing hydrogen to produce the amine group. Carbon also
in the nozzle, Isp (shifting) is then calculated from Eq. 9. is a useful hydrogen carrier, leading to the hydrocarbon
Refinement of the thermochemical performance calcula- family. The variety of liquid compounds that can be made
tions can be made to correct for two-phase losses when from these elements is a further restriction. Metals are
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE V Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Bipropellant Combinations (Cryogenic Systems)a

Specific impulse (sec) Combustion temperature
Bulk O/F
Oxidizer Fuel density ratiob Frozenc Shiftingc ◦F K
Oxygen Hydrogen 0.28 4.02 387 391 4935 2997

Oxygen Kerosine 1.02 2.06 285 300 6160 3677
Oxygen u-Dimethyl hydrazine 0.98 1.65 295 310 6010 3594
Ozone Hydrogen 0.30 4.0 413 424 5523 3323
Fluorine Hydrazine 1.31 2.30 334 363 7955 4675
Fluorine Hydrogen 0.45 7.60 396 410 6505 3869
Oxygen difluoride Hydrazine 1.27 1.54 317 339 6690 3972
Oxygen difluoride Diborane 1.00 3.73 340 365 7964 4680
Flox-30d Kerosine 1.09 3.05 298 316 6623 3935
Flox-70e Kerosine 1.20 3.80 317 344 7820 4600
a Courtesy of Rocketdyne, Division of Rockwell International and the U.S. Air Force Rocket Propulsion Laboratory.
b Oxidizer to fuel mixture ratio by weight.
c P = 1000 psia expanded to 14.7 psia (6895 kN/m2 → 101.4 kN/m2 ).
c
d A mixture of 30% fluorine and 70% oxygen, by weight.
e A mixture of 70% fluorine and 30% oxygen, by weight.
solids, of course, as are most of their hydrides. Metals do A. Cryogenic Oxidizers

not have a heat release appreciably greater than hydrogen
1. Ozone
and, with oxygen-based oxidizers, solid oxide products
form that cannot be expanded through the nozzle, causing Liquefied ozone, O3 , has stirred the interest of propellant
a loss of specific impulse. From these considerations, we chemists since the late 1940s. It has a serious disadvantage
obtain the following fuel categories: hydrogen, ammonia in that with very little stimulus it reverts back to oxygen ex-
and derivatives (amines, hydrazines), hydrocarbons, boro- plosively. Many impurities are known to sensitize ozone,
hydrides, and alcohols. such as hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, silver, and copper.
TABLE VI Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Bipropellant Combinations (Storable Systems)a

Oxidizer Fuel Bulk density O/F ratio Frozenb Shiftingb ◦F K
Tetrafluorohydrazine Ammonia 1.27 4.49 307 325 7284 4302

Tetrafluorohydrazine Hydrazine 1.43 3.16 313 334 7547 4448
Chlorine trifluoride Hydrazine 1.50 2.78 279 295 6553 3896
Hydrogen peroxide (95%) Hydrazine 1.26 2.00 269 287 4814 2657
Hydrogen peroxide (95%) Pentaborane 1.04 1.06 299 308 5000 3033
Hydrogen peroxide (95%) Kerosine 1.30 7.35 265 273 4785 2914
Chlorine pentafluoride Hydrazine 1.47 2.66 294 313 7039 4166
Chlorine pentafluoride MHF-3 1.41 2.79 276 303 6470 3850
Chlorine pentafluoride NOTSGEL-A 1.70 2.6 262 285 8058 4732
Nitrogen tetroxide Monomethyl hydrazine 1.20 2.15 278 289 5653 3396
Nitrogen tetroxide Hydrazine 1.22 1.30 284 292 5406 3259
Nitrogen tetroxide Aerozine-50c 1.21 2.00 276 289 5590 3361
Nitrogen tetroxide Aerozine-67e 1.28 1.80 273 288 6094 3368
MON-25 Monomethyl hydrazine 1.18 2.28 279 290 5705 3425
IRFNA, Type IIIA u-dimethylhydrazine 1.26 2.99 267 276 5300 3200
Hydrazine Pentaborane 0.79 1.28 325 328d 4661 2845
a Courtesy of Rocketdyne, Division of Rockwell International and the U.S. Air Force Rocket Propulsion Laboratory.
b Pc = 1000 psia expanded to 14.7 psia (6895 kN/m2 → 101.4 kN/m2 ).
c A mixture of 50% hydrazine and 50% UDMH, by weight.
d When kinetic limitations are considered, I = 315 seconds.
sp
e A mixture of 67.2% ethylene dihydrazine and 32.8% hydrazine, by weight.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE VII Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Bipropellant Combinations (Space Conditions—Vacuum Expansion)a
Oxidizer Fuel Bulk density O/F ratiob Frozenc Shiftingc ◦F K
Oxygen Hydrogen 0.31 4.50 446 456 5012 3040

Oxygen Methane 0.82 3.32 339 365 5482 3301
Oxygen difluoride Diborane 1.00 3.82 380 428 7054 4174
Chlorine pentafluoride Hydrazine 1.47 2.72 321 363 6533 3885
Chlorine pentafluoride MHF-3 1.41 2.8 305 354 6010 3594
Fluorine Hydrazine 1.31 2.34 369 424 7298 4310
Fluorine Hydrogen 0.50 9.00 450 475 6388 3804
Tetrafluorohydrazine Hydrazine 1.43 3.24 348 387 6978 4132
Nitrogen tetroxide Monomethyl hydrazine 1.21 2.28 317 340 5300 3200
Nitrogen tetroxide Aerozine-67 1.28 1.85 307 338 5741 3172
Nitrogen tetroxide Hybaline A-5 1.22 2.33 — 380 6596 3920
a Courtesy of Rocketdyne, Division of Rockwell International, and the U.S. Air Force Rocket Propulsion Laboratory.
b Oxidizer to fuel mixture ratio by weight.
c P = 150 psia (1034 kN/m2 ) expanded to A /A = 40.
c e t
The U.S. Navy and Air Force funded considerable research an operational system. A very reactive material, fluorine
studying ozone decomposition, effect of additives (sta- will react with most anything, thus all fluorine systems
bilizers and impurities), and analytical techniques. Some must be scrupulously cleaned and passivated. Mixtures of
fluorine compounds tended to improve ozone stability, but fluorine and oxygen (Flox) have been evaluated as a means
not sufficiently to make ozone a useful rocket oxidizer. Fir- of increasing oxygen performance. The experimental ef-
ings of a 25% O3 /75% O2 mixture were accomplished at forts have indicated that mixtures containing 30% or less
the 100-lb thrust (445 N) level using alcohol and kerosine fluorine behave essentially like oxygen, thus Flox30 could
as fuels. be substituted for liquefied oxygen with minimal changes
for about a 5–10% performance gain, depending on the
fuel selected.
2. Fluorine
Liquefied fluorine (F2 ) has been extensively evaluated
3. Oxygen Fluorides
and considerable rocket engine development has been
accomplished at the 15,000 and 40,000 lb f (66.7 and Liquefied oxygen difluoride (OF2 ) has been of interest
177.9 kN) level, although it has not yet been selected for for its “space storability” aspect. Its boiling point,
TABLE VIII Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Tripropellant Combinationsa

Oxidizer Fuelb Bulk density O/F ratio Frozen Shifting ◦F K
Oxygen Hydrogen (50%) 0.23 0.88 453c 458c 4662 2845

Beryllium (50%)
Oxygen Hydrogen (49%) 0.24 0.92 513 539d 4681 2856
Beryllium (51%)
Fluorine Hydrogen (69%) 0.17 0.85 425c 432c 3056 1953
Lithium (31%)
Fluorine Hydrogen (68%) 0.17 0.88 468 506d 2905 1869
Lithium (32%)
Hydrogen peroxide Hydrazine (71%) 1.24 0.55 329c 334c 5606 3370
Beryllium (29%)
b Percents are by weight.
c P = 1000 psia expanded to 14.7 psia (6895 kN/m2 → 101.4 kN/m2 ).
c
d P = 150 psia expanded to A /A = 40.
c e t
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE IX Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Monopropellantsa

Chamber
Monopropellant pressure (psia) Bulk density Frozenb Shifting ◦F K
Ethylene oxide 300 0.887 166 175 1860 1288

Hydrazinec 1000 1.01 155 174 1077 854
Hydrogen peroxide (90%) 300 1.44 132 165 1370 1016
MHF-5c 1000 1.011 — 215 1916 1320
Nitromethane 300 1.13 218 225 3950 2450
n-Propyl nitrate 300 0.935 — 179 1840 1278
Otto Fuel II 1000 1.23 — 208 2042 1390
b Expanded to sea level, 14.7 psia (101.4 kN/m2 ).
c Ammonia dissociation of 40% assumed.
−228.6◦ F (128.4 K), is sufficiently high so with proper V-2 missile and later in the U.S. Thor, Jupiter, Titan I, and
environmental control in appropriate spacecraft OF2 Saturn. It is currently used in the Atlas, launch vehicle
can be maintained in the liquid state with no boil-off, Delta, and Space Shuttle. Liquefied oxygen is nontoxic,
excessive pressure buildup, or need for refrigeration. stable, noncorrosive, inexpensive, and is readily available
Experimental rocket engine firings at the 100–400 lbf from commercial sources. Being a cryogen, it is not desir-
(445–1779 N) level, using diborane as the fuel were able for missile applications and extended space missions.
concluded successfully. Oxygen difluoride delivers about
2% less performance than fluorine with hydrogen as
B. Storable Oxidizers
the fuel, and a little higher with a hydrocarbon fuel.
It is a powerful oxidizing agent like fluorine and the Because of the inherent difficulty of maintaining cryo-
interhalogens, and the same care in material selection, genic oxidizers in a state of readiness, the military has had
cleaning, and passivation should be exercised. There is a particular interest in storable oxidizers. Although there
some indication that OF2 is less aggressive than fluorine is no specific definition of “storable,” it is usually consid-
with nonmetallic materials. Thus, OF2 might be a better ered to encompass the ability of the oxidizer to remain in
choice for some applications requiring gaskets, dynamic a ready condition within the missile or satellite for a min-
pump seals, and so on, since there are no nonmetallics imum of 5 years, and in some cases longer than 10 years.
recommended for use with flowing liquefied fluorine. During the 1960s the military services were interested in
Other oxygen fluorides, O2 F2 and O3 F2 , are thermally tactical weapons that required propellants with a low vapor
unstable, decomposing below −71◦ F (216 K). pressure, <100 psig (689.5 kN/m2 ) at 160◦ F (344 K); a
low freezing point, –20◦ F (244 K) to –65◦ F (219 K); be
noncorrosive; and would not decompose. Less severe re-
4. Nitrogen Trifluoride
quirements are placed on silo-based strategic weapons and
NF3 is the first of the N–F family of oxidizers. It also is a space vehicles.
cryogen and has lower performance than that of fluorine.
Since NF3 is less reactive than fluorine, it was selected as
1. Nitrogen Fluorides
an oxidizer for gas dynamic laser development. A wide
range of metals and plastic materials are suitable for ni- Tetrafluorohydrazine, N2 F4 , is also called dinitrogen
trogen trifluoride service. With most fuels, NF3 is not hy- tetrafluoride. While this oxidizer can be kept liquid un-
pergolic and offers only a marginal performance gain over der its own vapor pressure, the pressure is high, 400 psia
the much cheaper liquefied oxygen. at 70◦ F (2.76 MN/m2 at 294 K), thus N2 F4 is often con-
sidered space storable rather than earth storable.
Tetrafluorohydrazine first became of interest to the
5. Oxygen
rocket community in 1957 as an intermediate leading
Since Professor Robert H. Goddard pioneered the use of to a large family of postulated N–F compounds that
liquefied oxygen (O2 ) as a rocket oxidizer in 1926, it would make improved storable oxidizers. These hypo-
has been the “work horse” oxidant for missiles and space thetical materials had attractive theoretical performance,
launch vehicles. Called A-Stoff, it was used in the German and the estimated physical properties appeared desirable.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
Under Project Principia, funded by the Advanced Re- have to be orbited. It has been stored in mild steel contain-
search Projects Agency (ARPA), and programs supported ers for more than 20 years with no signs of deterioration or
by the military services, a large synthesis effort was ini- corrosion. The properties of chlorine pentafluoride mirror
tiated in the quest for high-energy, storable propellants. those of chlorine trifluoride, a product that has been pro-
Among those successfully synthesized and characterized duced and shipped commercially for more than 40 years.
were C(NF2 )4 , FC(NF3 )3 , HNF2 , ONF, ONF3 , O2 NF, and ClF5 is not in current production; however, it is easily
FNO3 . manufactured from chlorine and fluorine. The more avail-
While many of the properties of these materials met able ClF3 is used as a substitute for ClF5 in test programs
expectations, the family as a whole was found to be very when actual performance measurements are not needed.
sensitive and the compounds readily decomposed, often A complete ClF3 propulsion system was demonstrated for
violently. Extensive stabilization efforts were not fruitful; a liquid version of the Condor missile.
however, this research has led to a number of advances
in solid propellant chemistry. N2 F4 has proved to be a b. Perchloryl Fluoride. Perchloryl fluoride (ClO3 F)
valuable intermediate for the synthesis of solid oxidizers is a stable derivative of perchloric acid first synthesized in
and energetic binders for rocket motors. 1951. It is less toxic and much less reactive than ClF3 and
Mixtures of N2 F4 with other oxidizers were also inves- ClF5 . ClO3 F has the advantage of having some oxygen
tigated in an attempt to reduce its vapor pressure and yet that burns preferentially with carbon. Thus, ClO3 F/MMH
retain its relatively high performance. N2 F4 is a strong (monomethyl hydrazine, N2 H3 CH3 ) has an Isp close to
fluorinating agent resulting in unwanted reactions with that of ClF3 /hydrazine. The density of perchloryl fluoride
most additives and oxidizers. Some of the mixtures were is lower than that of ClF3 , and because of its high coeffi-
unstable and none proved to be useful. As a liquid oxi- cient of expansion, the density drops rapidly at the higher
dizer, the disadvantage of tetrafluorohydrazine for tactical temperatures of interest, 160◦ F (344 K). It is not reliably
weapons is the rapid lowering of density as its low criti- hypergolic with hydrazine and other fuels. With the emer-
cal temperature of 96.8◦ F (309 K) is approached (Fig. 3), gence of ClF3 , ClO3 F no longer was of interest.
complicating rocket engine design. Neat N2 F4 remains a
viable liquid oxidizer candidate for space missions where c. Oxychlorine Trifluoride. Oxychlorine trifluoride
the upper temperature limit is moderate. N2 F4 is not reli- (ClF3 O), called Florox, is an oxidizer that held promise.
ably hypergolic with common rocket fuels. It boils at 87.1◦ F (303.8 K), and has a density of 1.852.
Because of its oxygen content, Florox is especially good
2. Interhalogens with carbon-containing fuels (e.g., MMH). It is difficult
and expensive to manufacture which has limited its avail-
This family represents the highest energy earth-storable ability for rocket research programs.
liquid oxidizers. They are toxic and highly reactive. Yet, in
properly prepared containers these materials exhibit out- d. Bromine Pentafluoride. Bromine pentafluoride
standing storability characteristics. (BrF5 ) has received attention as an oxidizer because of
its very high specific gravity (2.47). Nevertheless, its per-
a. Chlorine Pentafluoride. Chlorine pentafluoride formance is mediocre.
(ClF5 ) is a product that resulted from the intensive fluo-
rine chemistry research programs. It was first synthesized
3. Nitrogen Oxides
in 1962, and fired in a small rocket thruster in 1964. It has
excellent density and the best performance of the available Nitrogen tetroxide (dinitrogen tetroxide) (N2 O4 ) is the
storable oxidizers, which makes it attractive for volume- “work horse” storable oxidizer. Initially considered and
limited systems. Because of its reactivity, it is best suited evaluated for the Bomarc (but not selected for the pro-
to prepackaged systems. The military has been reluctant duction version), it found its first major application in the
to use ClF5 because of its unforgiving nature; an inadver- Titan II intercontinental ballistic missile. It is used in the
tent release of the material produces a toxicity hazard and Titan III, 34D, and IV space launch vehicles, the Space
would likely result in a fire. ClF5 has been extensively Shuttle reaction control system, and in some of the newer
evaluated in a variety of rocket engines and subsystems. satellite propulsion systems. The high freezing point of
Chlorine pentafluoride was the selected oxidizer for the N2 O4 has restricted its use in many other applications.
Advanced Liquid Axial Stage (ALAS) built by Aerojet for Produced by the fertilizer industry, N2 O4 is available in
a Strategic Defense Initiative space-based interceptor. The large quantities at a low price.
high performance and high density would serve to mini- Stress corrosion cracking of titanium tanks by N2 O4 is
mize both the weight and volume of systems that would inhibited by the addition of about 1 wt% nitric oxide (NO),
P1: GPJ Final Pages
the resulting formulation being called MON-1. To assure five years if proper precautions are observed. Both 90%
that there will always be sufficient NO for protection since and 98% H2 O2 have been extensively evaluated with a
some NO is lost through venting, MON-3 (containing a variety of fuels including the hydrazines, kerosine, and
nominal 3 wt% NO) is used in the space shuttle and satel- pentaborane in 5000 lb f (22 kN) engines. As can be seen
lites. from Tables V and VI, the specific impulse penalty is 25
NO depresses the freezing point of N2 O4 without an sec for H2 O2 /kerosine compared to LOX/kerosine and 10
Isp loss but with an appreciable increase in vapor pressure sec compared to N2 O4 /MMH. Recent thought is that the
(Fig. 1). The freezing point of MON-25 is approximately lower toxicity would make a lower cost system even with
–70◦ F (216 K). Tetranitromethane will lower the freezing the slow decomposition problem and the lower perfor-
point to about –22◦ F (243 K). Many attempts to find other mance.
freezing depressants have failed. In the 1990s, NASA and others have experimented with
H2 O2 /JP-8 engines of about 10,000 pounds thrust. The
motivation is to avoid the necessity of handling and storing
4. Hydrogen Peroxide
cryogenic liquid oxygen. The downside is a loss of about
Hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) was of interest to Germany as 25 sec of specific impulse which makes the vehicle heavier.
being better suited for military purposes than liquid oxy-
gen. A number of missiles and aircraft were developed
5. Fuming Nitric Acids
beginning as early as 1936. Although wartime Germany
was able to produce only 80% H2 O2 (called T-Stoff), it Various grades of nitric acid have been used extensively as
was not as corrosive as nitric acid and did not produce storable oxidizers for many years. They have a good liquid
toxic fumes. It also had the advantage of being a mono- range and are hypergolic with most amine-based fuels. Be-
propellant that could be catalytically decomposed to pro- cause of their corrosiveness and tendency to thermally de-
vide hot gases (see Section III.F.5). The Messerchmidt compose, considerable effort was expended by Germany
163A Komet interceptor, a rocket-powered aircraft, was and the United States to overcome these traits. Water en-
first flown in 1937 using hydrogen peroxide monopropel- hances corrosion; therefore, early production centered on
lant. A later version, Me-163B, powered by a bipropellant making 100% HNO3 , known as white fuming nitric acid
engine used H2 O2 as the oxidizer with C-Stoff, a hydrazine (WFNA), and keeping it absolutely dry. The Germans used
hydrate-based fuel. a mixed acid, consisting of WFNA plus 10–17% sulfuric
After World War II, the United States produced 90% acid (a nitrating agent used in the explosives industry),
H2 O2 , and later a 98% grade. Peroxide readily found use which improved hypergolicity, and was believed (erro-
in missile gas generators, research aircraft, and satellite neously) to be less corrosive. They also found that the
attitude control systems, and as the oxidant in aircraft su- addition of 6% NO2 to WFNA, making red fuming nitric
perperformance propulsion systems. acid (RFNA), improved stability.
The U.S. Navy sponsored the development of peroxide After exploring the decomposition mechanisms of fum-
as an oxidant for underwater propulsion, and as an oxidant ing nitric acid, several investigators found that self-
in superperformance rocket systems for jet fighters. The dissociation of nitric acid occurs, forming water and oxy-
U. S. Air Force used a hydrogen peroxide/JP-4 bipropel- gen gas:
lant propulsion system to give additional performance to
2HNO3 → 2NO2 + H2 O + O2 (18)
modified NF-104 aircraft used by the USAF Aerospace
Test Pilot School. Other studies to find freezing point depressants and means
While NASA and the Air Force made extensive use to improve thermodynamic stability lead to the obvious
of hydrogen peroxide, the high freezing point of 11◦ F conclusion that one could add NO2 and water to WFNA
(261.5 K) and the slow thermal decomposition have lim- and force Eq. 18 to the left. An interesting development
ited its use for many applications. Some attempts were was the finding that hydrofluoric acid (HF) reduced the ni-
made to lower the freezing point with additives such as tric acid corrosion rate by a factor of 10 both in aluminum
ammonium nitrite, but with limited success. With the se- and stainless steel containers. From this work a family of
lection of proper materials and cleaning and passivation fuming nitric acid types was developed (Table X). Type
procedures, the decomposition rate is about 0.5% per year. IIIA, containing a nominal 14% NO2 , 2% water, and 0.6%
The 98% peroxide has a lower rate of about 0.1% per year, HF, became the standard nitric acid oxidizer, and is com-
but a higher freezing point, 31◦ F (272.6 K). The oxygen monly called IRFNA (inhibited red fuming nitric acid).
gas that results from the decomposition can be released This composition was found to be the least corrosive and
through relief valves and porous plugs if the resulting pres- most stable. It was used subsequently in the prepackaged
sure cannot be tolerated. A 90% peroxide system may be Bullpup and Lance missiles, the Bomarc, and in the Agena
sealed and stored for one year and a 98% H2 O2 system for spacecraft. Bullpups were still functional after 18 years
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE X Fuming Nitric Acids—Chemical Composition Limits (Weight Percent)a

Nitrogen Nitric acid Solid as Hydrogen
Type dioxide (NO2 ) Water (H2 O) (HNO3 ) nitrates fluoride (HF)
IIIA 14 ± 1.0 1.5 to 2.5 81.6 to 84.8 0.10 max. 0.7 ± 0.1
IIIB 14 ± 1.0 1.5 to 2.5 81.6 to 84.8 0.04 max. 0.7 ± 0.1
IIILS 14 ± 1.0 0.5 max. 83.7 to 86.4 0.04 max. 0.7 ± 0.1
IVb 44 ± 2.0 0.5 max. 52.7 to 57.4 0.04 max. 0.7 ± 0.1
a From MIL-P-7254F Amendment 2.

b Additional requirement for Type IV: Fe2 O3 0.002 wt% maximum.
of unattended storage, and the Lance had more than 15 making it the fuel of choice with either oxygen or fluorine
years of successful deployment. Type I (WFNA), used in when its cryogenic nature is acceptable. Liquefied hydro-
the Rascal, and Type II (RFNA with 6% NO2 and no in- gen was used in the S-II and S-IVB stages of the Saturn
hibitor), used in rocket-assisted takeoff units (RATO), are V launch vehicle for the Apollo program.
no longer used and were dropped from the specification. Liquid hydrogen is operational in Centaur, the Space
The maximum amount of NO2 that can be added to Shuttle, and the upper stage of Ariane 5. Boeing is devel-
fuming nitric acid without a phase separation is 44%. oping the RS-68 engine for the first stage of the EELV
This composition has the highest density, about a 3% which will use LOX/LH2 .
specific impulse improvement over Type IIIA, and is Derived from petroleum sources, hydrogen is readily
more corrosive. Officially identified as Type IV, is is also available at a reasonable cost. Liquefied hydrogen exists
called High Density Acid (HDA) and Maximum Density as a mixture of ortho- and para-hydrogen. Ortho-hydrogen
IRFNA (MDIRFNA). It was used in some models of the reverts exothermically to the para form, increasing boil-
Agena where the total operational period was measured off. This problem is avoided by catalytic ortho to para
in months. Phosphoric pentafluoride (PF5 ) was found to conversion by the manufacturer.
be a superior corrosion inhibitor over HF but was never Slush hydrogen, a mixture of frozen and liquefied hy-
adopted for system use. drogen, and hydrogen subcooled below its boiling point,
provides increased density and storability. This is espe-
6. Tetranitromethane cially attractive for space vehicles to minimize structure
weight and reduce the initial hydrogen boil-off rate. The
Tetranitromethane (TNM), C(NO2 )4 , is a monopropellant density values at the triple point of hydrogen are presented
that has high specific gravity (1.368) and an oxidizing po- in Table XI. The latent heat of fusion of solidified hydro-
tential similar to that of N2 O4 , but it freezes at 57.4◦ F gen at the triple point is 25.02 Btu/lb (117.32 J/mole).
(287.2 K). Some batches of TNM were sensitive to me- Solid cryogenic storage can double the in-space storage
chanical shock, while others readily passed safety tests, life of hydrogen.
indicating the possible presence of impurities. A eutectic
mixture of 64% TNM and 36%, by weight, N2 O4 freezes
2. Cryogenic Hydrocarbons
at –22◦ F (243 K) and is less sensitive than neat TNM.
Liquefied methane (CH4 ), ethane (C2 H6 ), ethene (C2 H4 ),
and propane (C3 H8 ), both neat and in various mixtures
7. Other Oxidizers
Perchloric acid has received limited attention as a liquid TABLE XI Density Values for Slush, Liquid, and
oxidizer as perhaps being less corrosive than fuming nitric Solid Hydrogen
acid, yet having a low freezing point. At concentrations
State lb/ft3 kg/m3
approaching 100%, HClO4 is very unstable and its perfor-
mance is inferior to that of nitric acid. Mixtures of amine At the normal boiling pointa
salts of perchloric acid were studied briefly. Liquid 4.425 70.889
At the triple pointb
Saturated liquid 4.81 77.02
C. Cryogenic Fuels 50% liquid/50% solid 5.09 81.54
Solid state 5.41 86.64
1. Hydrogen
Normal boiling point: –423.3◦ F (20.4 K) at 1 atm.
a
Liquefied hydrogen (H2 ) has high heat release and pro- Triple point: –434.8◦ F (13.8 K) at 1.021 psia (7.04
b
vides very low molecular weight combustion products, kN/m2 ).

P1: GPJ Final Pages
are excellent fuels, having better performance and com- incorporated into NF-104 aircraft used for astronaut train-
bustion characteristics than kerosine, and the disadvantage ing at the Aerospace Test Pilot School, Edwards AFB,
of being cryogenic. The higher density of these liquefied California.
gases offer an advantage over hydrogen in very large ve- Both the U.S. Air Force and Navy funded efforts to
hicles by keeping the tank size down, and thus overall develop petroleum-derived fuels for rocket engines using
dry weight, although there is also a reduction in specific nitric acid as the oxidizer. Many different compounds were
impulse. Slush and supercooled states provide increased investigated including mercaptans and thiophosphates.
density and longer storability. The individual components in JP-4 were isolated and eval-
uated on their ability to improve or to hinder hypergolicity
and combustion. Hydrazine compounds as additives were
D. Storable Fuels found to be the answer. Many other hydrocarbons (e.g.,
aromatics, aliphatics, acetylenes, terpenes, ethers) were
1. Storable Hydrocarbons
tried in many propulsion systems. Turpentine was used in
Much attention and effort has been devoted to develop the French Diamant launch vehicle. Another fuel of inter-
hydrocarbon-based rocket fuels because of the low cost est was the German Viscol, a vinyl isobutyl ether. Most
and widespread distribution of petroleum products. Kero- hydrocarbon fuels offer about the same specific impulse.
sine is the most widely used fuel, generally with liquefied Thus, the choices are factors of availability, physical prop-
oxygen as the oxidizer. This combination is used in the erties, and cost. For large boosters and launch vehicles, a
Atlas and Thor now launch vehicles, and was used in the high propellant density is desirable to reduce overall size,
❤
Titan I and the Saturn V first stage. Propellant-grade kero- and thus structure weight. Shelldyne™ -H, hydrogenated
sine (called RP-1) is essentially JP-4 jet engine fuel with dimer of norobornadiene, is an example of a dense fuel
a controlled aromatic content to eliminate coke formation (1.11 kg/m3 ) originally developed as a thermally stable,
in regenerative cooled engine jackets. It also has a narrow endothermic fuel ramjets as RJ-5.
density range needed for accurate volumetric loading of Several variations of kerosine have arisen in the 1990s:
missile tanks. (1) RP-2 a mixture of kerosine or heptane with quadri-
Some hydrocarbons decompose under high tempera- cyclane; (2) RG-1 the Russian version of kerosine rocket
ture. If the temperature is too high in the regenerative fuel with higher density than RP-1; and (3) JP-8X and
cooling passages such decomposition will leave carbon JP-8 + 100.
behind to the extent that the cooling passages could be- Other alternative hydrocarbons under research and de-
come clogged. Even if not clogged a layer of carbon can velopment which have a 10–15 sec specific impulse advan-
reduce the heat transfer rate inside the cooling passages tage over RP-1 include bicyclopropylidene, spiro-pentane
and result in a burn through. Reduction of heat transfer rate and tripropargyl-amine. A 10-sec increase over LOX/RP-1
with a coating of carbon is is actually desired in some hy- is available by using LOX/UDMH as did the Juno rocket
drocarbon engines where a coating of carbon on the com- in 1957. However, the current preference is to search for
bustion chamber side of the cooling passage reduces the something less toxic than the hydrazine family to enhance
heat transfer rate. Where the engine is not regeneratively the performance of an existing kerosine fueled vehicle.
cooled by the fuel, it is much cheaper to use JP-8, a com- RP-2 uses quadricyclane, which releases energy from its
mon military jet fuel rather than the more expensive RP-1. mechanically strained molecule in addition to the energy
Dr. Goddard used motor-grade gasoline in his experi- of combustion. Quadricyclane is strained due to the cy-
ments. Decalin, diethylcyclohexane, octane, and aviation clopropane rings. Compared to LOX/RP-1, a 50% quadri-
gasoline were also used as rocket fuels in the early years cyclane/50% RP-1 mixture, the specific impulse gain is
of rocketry in both the United States, and Germany. Dur- 3 sec. In a 65% quadricyclane/35% n-heptane, the specific
ing the 1950s the U.S. Air Force selected jet fuel to be impulse gain is 5 sec. For 100% quadricyclane, the specific
used with fuming nitric acid in RATO units and super- impulse gain would be 7 sec but experiments have revealed
performance propulsion systems to be used on the B-47, rough combustion. Other strained ring compounds such as
F-86, and other aircraft of that period. The JP-4/nitric cubane are also being studied for performance improve-
acid system was plagued with combustion instability, hard ment over RP-1 in existing vehicles
starts, and overall unreliability. Various additives, notably
amines and metal salts, were tried to reduce ignition delay
2. Alcohols
and improve the combustion process, with limited suc-
cess. The U.S. Navy had fared better with its JP-5/H2 O2 In Germany during the late 1930s and through World War
engine development program. Subsequently, a hydrogen II, methanol (CH3 OH) and ethanol (C2 H5 OH) (M-Stoff
peroxide rocket system (using the onboard JP-4 fuel) was and B-Stoff) were widely used as rocket fuels, being more
P1: GPJ Final Pages
available than petroleum products. The V-2 used ethanol propellant of choice. Unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine
and liquefied oxygen. Captured German technology and (UDMH) and monomethyl hydrazine (MMH), N2 H3 CH3 ,
equipment laid the foundation for alcohol-fueled rockets became the focus of considerable interest in the 1950s and
in both the United States and the Soviet Union after the are now the principal fuels used in storable liquid rocket
war. The alcohol fuels have excellent storability and com- propulsion systems. Wide acceptance of UDMH was slow
bustion properties, but relatively low performance. Fur- because of the interest from the U.S. Navy and Air Force to
furyl alcohol (C4 H3 CH2 OH) improves the hypergolicity use petroleum-derived fuels. Initially UDMH was used as
of hydrocarbon and amine fuels with nitric acid. an additive (17% UDMH) to JP-4 to stabilize combustion
in the Nike Ajax. This mixture was called JP-X Type II.
A 40% UDMH/60% JP-4 blend, JP-X Type I, was used in
3. Amines
the Bomarc. JP-X is covered by MIL-P-26694.
The German emphases on storability and hypergolicity A series of mixed amine fuels (MAF) were developed
led them to the amines. Tonka-250 (R-Stoff, used in the for tactical missiles and launch vehicles. (See Table XII.)
Taifun Missile) consisted of 57% xylidine and 43% tri- MAF-1 was used in the Bullpup deployed by the U. S.
ethylamine. Tonka-500 contained a number of compo- Navy and Air Force. MAF-4, also known as U-DETA
nents: toluidine, triethylamine, aniline, gasoline, and ben- and Hydyne, was used in the Jupiter-C and target drones.
zene. C-Stoff, used in the Me163B Komet consisted of A family of mixed hydrazine fuels (MHF) was also de-
methanol, 57%; hydrazine hydrate, 30% (reduced to 15% veloped, primarily as monopropellants but also used as
at the end of WW II to stretch supplies); water, 13%; and bipropellant fuels (Table XIII). MHF-3 was developed as
copper, 30 mg/l (as potassium cuprocyanide to improve the fuel for the Condor, and was used as M-86 monofuel
combustion). in aircraft auxiliary power units (APUs). MHF-5 (later
The U.S. Army had similar interests, plus a desiring for MHF-5B) was selected for the Condor gas generator. BA-
a low freezing point. To this end, the Jet Propulsion Lab- 1014 and BA-1185 were tailored for fluorine or interhalo-
oratory investigated a large number of additives to make gen oxidizers. The water in these fuels was added to pro-
gasoline hypergolic. At least 50% of xylidine or amine vide oxygen to combust preferentially with the carbon in
was needed to impart hypergolicity. Furfuryl alcohol was MMH, eliminating free carbon in the exhaust.
found to be a good fuel component. The final result was A 50–50 wt% blend of anhydrous hydrazine and
MIL-P-45700, a mixture of 51% aniline and 46.5% fur- UDMH (often called Aerozine-50) is used in the Titan II,
furyl alcohol that froze at –45◦ F (230.4 K). This mixture III, IV, and derivatives. A low freezing point is provided,
was used in the Navy’s Lark and in the Army’s Corpo- and the stability of hydrazine is enhanced. The 50–50 mix
ral missiles. Later, 7% hydrazine was added to improve was chosen over MMH because of lower cost and bet-
storability and low-temperature hypergolicity. ter availability. The cost difference no longer exists, and
A bewildering list of amines and mixtures has been pre- the production of MMH matches current demand. There-
pared as rocket fuels and evaluated by various organiza- fore, MMH is now the preferred storable fuel for new
tions. A commercial grade of monoethyl aniline (N -ethyl propulsion systems. Neat UDMH was used in the Agena
aniline) exhibited a freezing point of −81◦ F (210 K) and program and in the U. S. Army’s Lance. Now MMH is
excellent hypergolicity with fuming nitric acid. Diethy- used in the space shuttle reaction control system engines,
lene triamine was of interest as a density additive. Acetoni- the Minuteman, and Peacekeeper postboost propulsion
trile improved the low-temperature viscosity of amines. systems, and is being selected for satellite bipropellant
None of the possible hydrocarbon/amine fuels had a per- propulsion systems. The hydrazines have exhibited excel-
formance much better than the others; thus, the application lent storability, with no degradation for more than a 20
of these fuels was often based on availability, hypergolic- year period.
ity, freezing point, and smoothness of combustion. Symmetrical dimethyl hydrazine freezes at 16◦ F
(264.2 K) and has no advantages over UDMH. Ethy-
lene dihydrazine (EDH) offers a higher density, making
4. Hydrazines
mixtures of EDH and hydrazine with N2 O4 as the oxi-
Captured stocks of World War II hydrazine hydrate opened dizer attractive candidates for launch vehicle upper stages.
a new era of propellant research in the United States. The Aerozine-67 (67.2% EDH/32.8% hydrazine, by wt.) pro-
technology to manufacture anhydrous hydrazine was de- vides a substantial payload increase over that of neat MMH
veloped, a capability not available in wartime Germany. or Aerozine-50, although the Isp is slightly lower.
The high freezing point of anhydrous hydrazine and its ten- Ammonia is an excellent fuel, but its high vapor
dency for chamber explosions have restricted the use of the pressure has restricted its use. In 1949 JPL first eval-
neat material to small space engines, where it is the mono- uated ammonia with fuming nitric acid and N2 O4 . An
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE XII Mixed Amine Fuel Compositions (Nominal)a

Fuel DETAb Acetonitrile UDMH PRODGAc DIPGAd TIPRAMe Water f
MAF-1 50.5 9.0 40.5 — — — —

MAF-2 — — — 42.6 48.3 9.1 —
MAF-3 80.0 — 20.0 — — — 1.0
MAF-4 (U-DETA) 40.0 — 60.0 — — — —
MAF-5 50.5 20.0 29.5 — — — —
aBy weight percent.
bDiethylenetriamine.
c Propargyl diglycidylamine.
d Dipropargyl glycidylamine.
e Tripropargylamine.
f Propellant-grade DETA and UDMH normally contain water (<1.0% by weight), thus all mixtures will have a small
amount.
ammonia/liquefied oxygen engine powered the X-15 re- for more than 30 years. Complete combustion with lique-
search aircraft in the XLR-99 engine. fied oxygen and hydrogen peroxide is difficult, resulting
in slow burning condensed boron particles and the for-
mation of vitreous boron oxide solids in nozzles. Since
5. Metal-Based Fuels
boron fluoride is gaseous, these problems are eliminated
The known liquid metal alkyls are low in performance, but with fluorine-based oxidizers. A unique propellant com-
they are pyrophoric. Triethyl aluminum and triethyl boron bination, pentaborane/hydrazine was also studied. In this
are useful as igniters in liquefied oxygen/kerosine propul- case, the hydrazine acts as the oxidizer. The high theoreti-
sion systems (e.g., Atlas). Of the light metal hydrides, cal Isp of this system was predicated upon the formation of
only diborane and pentaborane are normally liquid. Dib- boron nitride (BN). Combustion inefficiencies caused by
orane is especially attractive for use with Flox or OF2 in condensed products, kinetic limitations, and combustion
space-storable propulsion applications. B2 H6 decomposes instability made the realization of high delivered perfor-
above −4◦ F (253 K), necessitating the use of refrigeration mance difficult.
for extended storage periods. Pentaborane is very stable Experimental fuels based on aluminum and lithium
as demonstrated by desert storage in mild steel cylinders borohydride were evaluated, but were dropped when
TABLE XIII Mixed Hydrazine Fuel Compositions (Nominal)

Freezing Hydrazine MMH Hydrazinium Water a
Fuel Point, ◦ F(K) (wt%) (wt%) nitrate (wt%) (wt%)
MHF-1 −65(219) 23.3 43.3 31.4 —

MHF-2 −65(219) 23.3 36.5 40.2 —
MHF-3 (M-86) −65(219) 14.0 86.0 — —
MHF-4 −43.6(231.2) 32.5 50.5 17.0 —
MHF-5 −44.6(230.6) 26.0 55.0 19.0 2.0 max.
MHF-5A <−65(219) 13.0 68.0 19.0 —
MHF-5B −45(230.4) 23.0 58.0 19.0 —
MHF-6 <−65(219) 16.5 73.0 — 10.5
MHF-7 −65(219) 14.0 81.0 — 5.0
MGGP-1 −65(219) 63.0 — 10.0 27.0
H-70 (MGGP-3) −58(223) 70.0 30.0 — —
TSF-1 <−65(219) 60.0 — 21.0 19.0
TSF-2 <−65(219) 58.0 — 25.0 17.0
BA-1014 −2.5(254) 66.7 24.0 — 9.3
BA-1185 −65(219) 29.8 50.5 — 19.7
a Propellant-grade hydrazine and MMH normally contain water (<1.0 percent by weight),
thus all mixtures will have a small amount.

P1: GPJ Final Pages
UDMH became available. Beryllium borohydride has 4. Decreased service life at temperature extremes
been tested, but its toxicity precluded further consider- 5. Increased unusable residual propellants further
ation. penalizing mass fraction.
The hybalines are a group of coordination compounds
of light metal hydrides or metal borohydrides, complexed Light metals have high heat release, making them at-
with Lewis bases such as amines or ethers. Following are tractive as fuels or fuel components. As mentioned previ-
some of the compositions evaluated: ously, there are very few candidates that are liquids. One
way to use high energy, solid materials is to suspend them
Hybaline A-3: methylamine aluminum borohydride in a liquid carrier. In particular, Al, AlH3 , B, Li, LiH, Be,
Hybaline A-4: dimethylamine aluminum borohydride and BeH2 have been of most interest. Considerable re-
Hybaline A-5: 53 wt% A-3 and 47 wt% A-4 search was undertaken to find techniques that would keep
Hybaline A–14: 2-ethylhexylamine aluminum the solid from settling. Very fine particle size (typically
borohydride 0.1–10 µm) is needed and the liquid thickened. Different
hydrocarbon, hydrazine, and alcohol carriers were evalu-
Hybaline B fuels, amine adducts of beryllium borohy- ated. Hydrazine and MMH were of most interest because
dride, were also prepared and studied. Hybalines may be of their higher energy, but were subject to gassing exac-
viewed as a densified form of hydrogen bounded by en- erbated by the high surface area of the metal or hydride
ergetic light metal atoms. This family of fuels are hyper- powder. Gels, slurries, and emulsions were formulated and
golic with most rocket oxidizers. They react with water, evaluated.
and sometimes are pyrophoric in air. Propellant feed sys- Thixotropic gels were of particular interest because of
tems must be kept very clean since traces of moisture and their ability to be liquefied by internal mechanical stress
air would form solid materials, causing flow problems. and to return to the gel state when the stress is removed.
Hybalines are neither sufficiently stable nor storable for The consistency of thixotropic gels depends on the du-
military applications. ration and rate of shear. Under static conditions, these
Lithium has attractive theoretical performance with gels exhibit a weak structure and are nonflowing, semi-
fluorine-based oxidizers. Experiments have been con- solid substances. If, however, the yield point is exceeded
ducted using molten lithium injected into a 3000 lb f and the gels are sheared at a constant rate, the structure
(13.3 kN) thrust chamber with an interhalogen oxidizer. will progressively weaken and the viscosity will decrease
Solid lithium was used in hybrid experiments with chlo- with time. The structure of true thixotropic materials will
rine trifluoride as the oxidizer. In this case, heat transfer break down completely under the influence of high shear-
to the solid metal must be controlled to prevent premature ing action such as injection through an orifice, in which
melting, yet sufficient vaporization of the fuel must occur case they behave like true Newtonian liquids. As soon
to sustain proper combustion. Lithium alkylates, for exam- as the shearing action has ceased, however, the struc-
ple, butyllithium, contain insufficient lithium to enhance ture will reform. The rate of breakdown and reformation
performance. of the structure of a gel is a characteristic of that gel,
and the time required for the transition may vary from
a fraction of a second to many hours. Many gelling and
E. Heterogeneous and Gelled Propellants
thickening agents were tried, with colloidal silicon diox-
Gelation of liquid rocket propellants is of interest for sev- ide, hydroxyethyl cellulose, and polyacrylic acid being
eral reasons: typical. Lithium and its compounds proved too reactive
(1) retardation of evaporation rate of volatile or toxic for a stable propellant. The toxicity of beryllium and its
liquids; (2) retardation of mixing of spilled propellants hydride severely restricts its usefulness. Boron gels are
to prevent explosions; (3) suspension of energetic solid best suited for air-breathing engines, such as the ducted
powders to improve performance; and (4) reduction of rocket. Gels containing AlH3 evolved too much hydrogen
sloshing in tanks. gas to be practical. Several successful aluminum-based
The above advantages come with some unique prob- formulations are given in Table XIV. Alumizine, covered
lems: by MIL-P-27412 (subsequently cancelled) was fired in
a modified Titan II engine. MICOM GEL was tested in
1. Difficult control of mixture ratio because of the an Lance engine and several organizations have evalu-
heterogeneous flow properties ated NOTSGEL-A in a variety of thrust chambers with
2. Slightly decreased delivered performance compared different oxidizers. These formulations meet long-term
to theoretical stability requirements and present no undue operational
3. Higher pressure drops causing heavier inert weight hazards.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE XIV Heterogeneous Rocket Fuel Composition

Component Alumizine-43G NOTSGEL-A MICOM GEL
Aluminum Powder 43.0 60.0 60.0

MMH — 31.1 38.5
Hydrazine 56.3 5.1 —
Colloidal Silica — 3.0 —
Modified Polyacrylic Acid 0.3 — —
Water 0.4 — —
Hydroxypropyl Cellulose — — 1.4
Hydroxyethyl Cellulose — 0.8 —
Dimethylurea — — 0.1
The gelling of cyrogenic propellants has also been stud- change with time. The following are typical gelled oxi-
ied. Liquified hydrogen can be gelled with light hydrocar- dizer compositions:
bons (e.g. methane, ethane), which are solid at hydrogen
temperatures. 1. Oxygen and 5 wt% aluma or titania
Gelation of liquid hydrogen has a payoff of reducing 2. Oxygen difluoride and 4.5 wt% colloidal silica
boil-off rate and significantly reducing spill radius. A 10% 3. RFNA and 4 wt% colloidal silica
density increase is possible with gelled hydrogen by the 4. IRFNA and 5 wt% carbon black
addition of 10% solid ethane or methane powder. 5. Nitrogen dioxide and 3.5 wt% colloidal silica
Current research and development activities include 6. MON-15 and 3.5 wt% colloidal silica
gelation of RP-1 in order to add aluminum powder to a
LOX/RP-1 system to gain increased performance. The gelling of chlorine pentafluoride (ClF5 ) with sub-
micron particle size ferric oxide and alumna was not suc-
cessful. Silica reacts with CLF5 . Fluoride salts (e.g., CaF2 ,
1. Oxidizers
LiF) are chemically stable with ClF5 , but large amounts
Liquid rocket oxidizers are more energetic than are solid are required for gelling.
oxidizers; thus, there are no solid components that can
be added to a liquid oxidizer to enhance specific impulse.
2. Safety
However, potential for improvement in safety and opera-
tional usage is the incentive to develop gelled oxidizers. In Gelling of liquid propellants has been proposed as a means
an accidental spill, gelled oxidizers would have reduced of reducing the consequences of an accident in which pro-
flow characteristics and lower vaporization rates, making pellants are released from their container. A large-scale
it easier to contain the spilled propellant and rendering it spill of liquid propellants will result in splashing and
easier to clean up. Alleviation of sloshing in tanks provides spreading of the liquid over a large area. Tests have shown
greater flight stability of missiles. that under similar conditions the gelled propellant will re-
Another reason to gel oxidizers is to match the flow main confined to a smaller area due to its high viscosity,
properties of a gelled fuel. The addition of LiNO3 to nitric making it much easier to clean up. In the case of a si-
acid gelled with silica, for example, increases the density, multaneous spill of a hypergolic propellant combination,
does not seriously detract from Isp , and provides rheo- the propellants will ignite at the interface, but will not be
logical characteristics similar to those of MICOM GEL, involved in a violent fuel/oxidizer deflagration. The fuel
minimizing mixture ratio shift as propellant temperatures will continue to burn as a normal fuel/air reaction, but be-
are varied across the operational range. cause of its immobility, will not spread. Increased safety
Liquefied oxygen, oxygen difluoride, fuming nitric is also provided by gels when small, low pressure leaks
acid, and nitrogen dioxide have been gelled. Gelation of occur at fittings or cracks since gels will not flow from the
LOX is actually possible using frozen N2 O4 particles. leak as would a liquid.
While the resulting formulations were chemically sta- Tests have also shown that gelation of liquids will also
ble and found insensitive to shock, long-term storability reduce the rate of vaporization, thus the spread of toxic or
has not been fully resolved. Syneresis, or the exuding of flammable vapors is lessened. However, the vapor pres-
liquid, is a problem that may occur after several months sure, reactivity, and toxicity of the propellants are not al-
or a few years of storage. Rheological behavior can also tered. In other tests, tanks containing gelled propellants
P1: GPJ Final Pages
subjected to bullet impact or external fire experienced 2. Nitroaliphatic and Nitrate Esters
pressure rupture but did not detonate as will typical high
These compounds have had limited application as mono-
performance solid propellants.
propellants. Nitromethane, used by race car and model
airplane enthusiasts, has the highest performance and was
F. Monopropellants
the most studied. It is normally sensitive to shock and ther-
There are three basic types of liquid monopropellants, or mal stimuli, and has a high flame temperature of 3950◦ F
monofuels: (2450 K). Engine tests were characterized by instability
and inefficient operation. While most additives generally
1. Single substances (molecular compounds) that increase its sensitivity, a few alcohols and hydrocarbons
contain an oxidizing agent and combustible matter in were found to improve stability and lower the flame tem-
the same molecule perature with a modest decrease of performance. The Ger-
2. Intimate mixtures of compounds that are stable under man Myrol, consisted of 80% methyl nitrate and 20%
normal conditions methanol, was reasonably safe to handle.
3. Thermodynamically unstable chemicals N -propyl nitrate (NPN) was used in jet engine starters
of U.S. military aircraft and for decoys. The British used
Upon ignition, the first two types of monopropel- the similar isopropyl nitrate for engine starters and missile
lants will undergo combustion much like a bipropellant gas generators. NPN was found to be sensitive to adiabatic
combination. The components in the second type must be compression. The addition of 60% ethyl nitrate resulted
compatible at normal temperatures, but react when ignited in an 8% specific impulse improvement, but further sen-
or heated under pressure to give hot combustion gases. The sitizes NPN.
third type decomposes to produce hot gases by means of
a catalyst or a thermal source. These are the monopropel- 3. Composite Monopropellants
lants, specifically hydrogen peroxide and hydrazine, that
have been the most acceptable and useful in a wide variety a. Amine-nitric acid. A major effort in the develop-
of systems. ment of high-energy monopropellant candidates was di-
The challenge in developing high-energy monopropel- rected at the amine nitrate-nitric acid composite-type for-
lants is finding compositions that are easy to handle and mulations. These mixtures can be considered premixed
stable to a wide variety of adverse environmental influ- bipropellants. This family consists principally of sec-
ences, yet will decompose rapidly and smoothly when ondary, tertiary, ditertiary, and quaternary amines that are
initiated to deliver its energy in a rocket or gas generator. converted to the corresponding nitric acid salts and mixed
in solution with nitric acid (WFNA or RFNA). A large va-
1. Molecular Monopropellants (Combustion Type) riety of mixtures has been made and evaluated, sometimes
with disastrous results. Examples of this class that have
Examples of molecular liquid monopropellants that un- been studied are
dergo a combustion process are nitromethane (CH3
NO2 ), ethylene oxide (C2 H4 O), n-propyl nitrate (C3 H7
NO3 ), ethyl nitrate (C2 H5 NO3 ), and tetranitromethane 1. WFNA and pyridinium nitrate (Penelope)
[C(NO2 )4 ]. Electrical sparks and pyrotechnic squibs are 2. WFNA and diisopropylaminium nitrate (Isolde)
used to ignite these propellants. 3. WFNA and [1,2 4-trimethyl-1,4-diaza bicyclo
Ethylene oxide, a commercial chemical, was used to (2,2,2)] octane dinitrate (Cavea)
power decoys. It is stable under high-pressure flow con-
ditions; however, the vapor phase is sensitive. This com- This family of composite monopropellants has moder-
pound is subject to exothermic reactions when in contact ate theoretical performance levels ranging from ∼220 to
with various acids, bases, salts, and catalysts. Decompo- 260 sec (2158 to 2550 N sec/kg). The performance, sensi-
sition of ethylene oxide is difficult to sustain because of tivity and thermal stability of these composites vary with
its high autoignition temperature of 804◦ F (702 K) and the amine structure and oxidation ratio. As the oxidation
carbon formation from thermal cracking. ratio approaches stoichiometric, the performance and the
The U. S. Navy is developing cyclodextrin nitrate with sensitivity are increased and the thermal stability is de-
an Isp of 240–280 sec and a density near 2.0 gm/cc. creased. As a result, these composites were found to be
Dinitramine is another monopropellant candidate with an quite shock sensitive and of questionable thermal stability.
Isp of 270–300 sec and a density of 1.9 gm/cc. Another Cavea underwent extensive characterization and engine
monopropellant candidate in the 1990s is hydroxyl am- evaluation at the 10,000 lb f (44.5 kN) thrust level. After
monium nitrate. several explosions occurred, testing was discontinued.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
b. Difluoroamines. Most of the difluoroamino com- Essentially, there are three chemical types of heteroge-
pounds and composite monopropelants have exhibited neous monopropellants that have been studied: Arco-
poor thermal stability and extreme shock sensitivity. gels, B4 C/oxidizer gels, and beryllium composites. The
The most extensively studied of this family was 1,2- Arcogels are thick slurries of aluminum powder and
bis(difluoroamino)ethane as both a molecular monopro- nitrate or perchlorate salts in an uncured solid binder
pellant and in solution with either tetranitromethane or that do not shear thin. A typical formulation, APG-25,
nitrogen tetroxide (the latter mixture known as Cyclops). [63.2% NH4 ClO4 + 20.7% Al + 14.8% (CH2 )x + 1.3%
The mixtures were less sensitive than the neat compound, thickener], has a density of 1.8 kg/m3 and an Isp of 166 sec
but not sufficiently to avoid detonations. (1.628 kN sec/kg). Its very high viscosity greatly compli-
The BN-type monopropellants are perhaps the high- cated a feed and engine system design.
est energy (Isp about 300 sec) (2942 N sec/kg) consisting Heterogeneous formulations of B4 C in various oxidiz-
of borane compounds dissolved in hydrazine. Dekazine ers, including nitrogen dioxide, perchloryl fluoride, and
(54% diamino-decaborane and 46% hydrazine) received nitric acid, gelled with carbon black or SiO2 were evalu-
the most attention, being fired in a 600 lb f (2669 N) thrust ated in small engines for prepackaged and torpedo appli-
chamber at 1000 psia (6:895 MN/m2 ). Also in this family cations. Moderate performance, about 225 sec (2,207 N
are the Hepcats, [(CH3 )3 NNH2 ]+ B10 H13 -type salts dis- sec/kg), was realized. These compositions are insensitive
solved in hydrazine. Low-delivered performance and high to shock, but appear to be unstable at 160◦ F (344 K).
sensitivity contributed to the demise of this family. The beryllium monopropellants consist of Be and BeH2
in solutions of hydrazine, hydrazinium nitrate, water, or
c. Otto fuel. The Otto monopropellants, a series of hydrogen peroxide gelled with colloidal silica, aluminum
formulations based on desensitized aliphatic dinitroxyl octanoate, or Kelzan-AO. One patented formulation hav-
esters, were originally developed for torpedo propulsion. ing a theoretical performance of 310 sec (3040 N sec/kg)
Otto fuel II is the most successful composition, having is:
outstanding safety characteristics while meeting strin-
15.32 wt% Be + 53.91wt% N2 H5 NO3 + 30.77 wt% N2 H4
gent temperature, shock stability, and energy require-
ments. Under normal conditions, it is considered to be These compositions are insensitive to shock, but are sub-
nonflammable and nonexplosive, making it a safe project to poor long-term storability and gassing. Because of
pellant. Its major constituent is propylene glycol dini- their toxicity and inefficient combustion, beryllium-based
trate stabilized with dibutylsebacate (see Table XV). Otto propellants are of little current interest.
Fuel II is used in the Mk 46 Mod 1 and Mk 48 torpe-
dos, and it has been selected for several developmental 5. Molecular Monopropellants
programs, including a liquid-propellant gun and a rocket- (Decomposition Type)
propelled target drone. Ignition is accomplished with a
solid squib that pressurizes the chamber to the 200 psi a. Hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide was the
(1.38 MN/m3 ) necessary to sustain decomposition of the first widely used monopropellant. During the late 1930s
Otto Fuel. and through World War II, the Germans used 70–80%
H2 O2 , and called it T-Stoff. They used it to drive the bipro-
pellant pumps in the V-2. After the war, the technology to
4. Heterogeneous Monopropellants produce 90–99% H2 O2 was developed. Hydrogen perox-
Another group of composite-type monopropellants are ide was also used to drive pumps in the early U.S. missiles
the heterogeneous monopropellants that consist of high- and in satellite reaction control systems. In the X-15 high-
energy or high-density solid ingredients suspended in altitude research aircraft, peroxide was used to drive the
various liquid vehicles as a slurry or through gelation. main propellant pumps and APU, and in the attitude con-
trol thrusters.
Hydrogen peroxide is decomposed catalytically to form
TABLE XV Composition of Otto Fuel II superheated steam and gaseous oxygen:
Component Amount (wt%) 100% H2 O2 → H2 O (steam) + 12 O2
Propylene glycol dinitratea 75.8–76.2 + 685 Btu/lb (54.10 kJ/mole)
2-Nitrodiphenylamine 1.4–1.6
or
Di-n-butyl sebacate 22.2–22.8
Sodium ion 0.8 ppm (max.) 90% H2 O2 → H2 O (steam) + 12 O2
a 1.2 Dinitroxypropane. + 505 Btu/lb (37.96 kJ/mole)
P1: GPJ Final Pages
Many materials act as catalysts to decompose peroxide. decomposition of hydrazine, greatly expanded the applica-
The following have been successfully used in operational tions of monopropellant hydrazine. It opened the way for
systems: the use of hydrazine in systems requiring rapid-response
multiple starts, especially the 0.2–25 lb f (0.9–111 N)
1. Calcium, potassium, and sodium permanganate in an thrusters used on satellites. Shell 405 catalyst consists of
aqueous solution (German Z-Stoff) a porous aluma substrate impregnated with chemically
2. Permanganate salts deposited on ceramic or metal deposited iridium. The catalyst granules contain about
balls 33 wt% Ir and are in the range of 14–30 mesh. The surface
3. Silver and other noble metals area of the catalyst is typically 70 to 120 m2 /g.
4. Transition metal oxides HYDRAZINE BLENDS. Various compounds have
been evaluated as means of improving hydrazine mono-
Screens of silver or silver-plated brass are the com- propellant performance and to depress its freezing point
monly used H2 O2 catalysts in the United States. without adverse effect on catalysts. The most successful
In the search for higher energy and low-freezing mono- of the formulations are listed in Table XIII. MHF-3 was
propellants, experimental compositions of hydrogen per- used in auxiliary and emergency power units on many ex-
oxide containing various amounts of ethanol, ammonia, perimental and prototype aircraft. Carbon resulting from
and ammonium hydroxide, singly and in combination, the MMH decomposition can reduce the gas generator
were tested but with adverse effect on sensitivity and life for some applications. The TSF series, developed as
stability. monofuels for aircraft turbine engine starters, do not have
this potential carbon problem. The addition of oxygen in
b. Hydrazine. Hydrazine’s ease of decomposition the form of hydrazinium nitrate (HN) helps to alleviate
and freedom from the instabilities of the other monopro- carbon formation. The MHF-5 series are very stable at
pellants has led to its becoming the principal fuel for low- temperatures below 140◦ F (333 K) in properly prepared
thrust satellite propulsion. It has replaced hydrogen per- containers. HN also provides a small Isp gain over neat
oxide in almost all monopropellant applications because hydrazine. Shell 405 is the catalyst typically used with
of its better storability and higher performance. Intelsat these blends. It functions at temperatures as low as −65◦ F
III and IV, Pioneer 10 and 11, Mariner 69, Landsat, FLT- (219 K).
SATCOM, Telestar, and Tracking and Data Relay Satellite Hydroxylamine, NH2 OH, will depress the freezing
are a few of the many systems equipped with hydrazine point of hydrazine, but causes excess gas evolution.
thrusters. Hydrazine is also used to drive the APUs in Methoxyamine (O-methylhydroxylamine, MOA) and
the space shuttle. H-70 (70% N2 H4 and 30% H2 O) pow- methoxyamine nitrate (MOAN) are also good depressants
ers the emergency power unit (EPU) in the F-16 and F-20 with acceptable stability and offer a small performance
fighter aircraft. improvement. Hydrazoid-X consisted of 86% MOA, 12%
Hydrazine is decomposed by either thermal or catalytic N2 H4 , and 2% H2 O. AMICOM propellant, 68% N2 H4 ,
means, producing hot gases of ammonia, hydrogen, and 20% MOAN, and 12% H2 O, has a freezing point of −58◦ F
nitrogen: (223 K).
Binary, ternary, and quaternary mixtures using the fol-
3 N2 H4 → 4 NH3 + N2 + 144,300 Btu/lb (10.74 MJ/mole)
lowing compounds have been also evaluated: ammonia,
The resultant ammonia product is also dissociated by hy- water, MMH, hydrazine azide, and monomethylamine
drazine catalysts. Since its decomposition is an endother- nitrate.
mic process, it must be minimized to avoid serious perfor-
mance loss:
G. Tripropellants
4 NH3 → 2 N2 + 6H2 − 79,200 Btu/lb (5.90 MJ/mole)
The tripropellant concept uses the high heat release from
Typically, about 40% of the ammonia is dissociated, being the oxidation of a light metal or metal hydride to heat
controlled by catalyst bed design and residence time. hydrogen expanded to generate a very high specific im-
Hypergolic slugs were used to initiate hydrazine decom- pulse (see Table VIII). The hydrogen serves as an expand-
position in the early systems. Later, catalysts composed of able, inert working fluid of low molecular weight, not un-
transition metals and their oxides were used which pro- like a thermodynamic nuclear rocket. The hydrogen can
vided a limited restart and pulse-mode capability. These be added with the reactants, or if the hydrogen preferen-
catalysts were heated electrically to about 800◦ F (700 K) tially reacts with the oxidizer, it can be introduced after the
to effect rapid hydrazine decomposition. The availability combustion zone. Hydrogen can be introduced as a metal
in 1964 of Shell 405 catalyst, which causes spontaneous hydride, making the system appear to be a bipropellant
P1: GPJ Final Pages
system; the differentiation being there is excess hydrogen American Rocket Company (AMROC) attempted a
(from a thermochemical standpoint) for expansion with- launch from Vandenberg AFB with a hybrid rocket ve-
out being oxidized. Pentaborane + hydrogen peroxide is hicle. The oxidizer was LOX and the fuel was a butadiene
an example of such a system. with the consistency of a soft automobile tire.
The chemical propellant systems with the highest theo-
retical specific impulse are beryllium/ozone/hydrogen and
I. High Energy Density Materials
lithium/fluorine/hydrogen. The Be/O2 /H2 system was ex-
perimentally evaluated with the liquefied oxygen gelled High-Energy Density Material (HEDM) research has been
to suspend the powdered beryllium. Fluidized injection of under way since the mid-1980s. Rather than presume
Be powder was also attempted. The technical difficulties which of the previous categories of propellants will be
of incorporating the light metals and their hydrides into a embellished with the development of these new technolo-
liquid system has limited the development of a practical gies, the area will be discussed separately. Fundamentally,
tripropellant propulsion system. the potential for these special molecules is that they con-
tain and will release energy far beyond what is possible
with normal combustion. The strained ring hydrocarbons
H. Hybrids
discussed in Section III.D.1 as kerosine additives are ac-
A hybrid system uses a liquid propellant (usually the ox- tually part of the HEDM activity with near-term potential.
idizer) with a solid propellant grain in the same rocket The following are research areas with potential payoff
engine. The configuration of the solid fuel is similar to for improved performance rocket propellants:
that of a solid propellant motor. Many different propel-
lant combinations can be used, ranging from cryogenic 1. Polymeric or poly nitrogen (N4 , N6 , N8 ). In 1998,
oxidizers to conventional storable oxidizers, with metal- AFRL announced that scientists at Edwards AFB had
loaded fuels as well as common fuels such as rubbers or identified N5 as the cation combined with the AsF6
plastics. As a rule, liquid oxidizers are superior to solid anion. The cation’s heat of formation was calculated
in specific impulse, while solid fuels, particularly metal- at 353 kcal/mol
ized, offer a performance and density improvement over 2. Polymeric or poly oxygen (O4 , O6 , O8 )
liquids. Because it is possible to select dense oxidizers, 3. Hydrides of boron (BH2 , BH4 )
such as ClF5 with a specific gravity of 1.78 and a metal- 4. B-N analogs of prismane (B3 N3 H6 )
loaded fuel with a specific gravity of 2.0, hybrid systems 5. Atomic additives to hydrogen in an O2 /H2 system.
appear attractive for volume limited applications. Hybrids
have the flexibility of being restarted and throttled in the Adding energetic atoms to a LOX/LH2 system has the
manner of a liquid engine. Reverse hybrids, using a solid potential to increase specific impulse by the following
oxidizer (e.g., ammonium perchlorate) and a liquid fuel amounts:
(hydrazine) have been tested. Since solid oxidizers are not
as energetic as liquid oxidizers, there is little value in the 1. Carbon atoms + 49 sec
reverse hybrid concept. 2. Boron atoms + 32 sec
The Firebolt (AQM-81), a target vehicle, uses IRFNA 3. Aluminum atoms + 27 sec
as the oxidizer with a PBAN based solid fuel. A typical 4. Hydrogen atoms + 19 sec
fuel composition is
The use of F2 /H2 in a vehicle also has a 19-sec increase
1. 80 wt% polybutadiene/acrylic acid/acrylonitrile in specific impulse over LOX/LH2 , but it is hoped that
❤
2. 20 wt% polymethylmethacrylate (Plexiglas™ ) the new technology will be feasible without the safety
problems and complications of using liquid fluorine.
A 20,000 lb f (88.96 kN) hybrid unit utilizing 90% hy-
drogen peroxide and an aluminum-enriched polyethylene
grain was successfully tested. The oxidizer was catalyt- IV. HANDLING AND STORAGE OF LIQUID
ically decomposed, producing hot gases that ignited the ROCKET PROPELLANTS
fuel in a smooth and reliable manner.
The solid lithium/ClF3 concept was discussed in Sec- This section provides additional information on liquid
tion III.D.5. Experimental grains consisting of powdered propellants in current or recent use or that have been
lithium held in a solid binder have been made and tested. the subject of considerable evaluation and could be se-
Because lithium is very light, it has been difficult to get lected for future propulsion systems. Rocket propellants
high metal loadings in a usable grain. are by nature hazardous materials and must be handled
P1: GPJ Final Pages
and used only in appropriate facilities by personnel who 27 vol%. Its flash point is <32◦ F (273 K) and autoignition
have the proper training and knowledge of their properties temperature is 1204◦ F (924.3 K).
and approved personal protective equipment. The follow- Water fog effectively suppresses ammonia fires since it
ing outlines the type information available and the general will cool the burning surface and reduce ammonia vapor
precautions needed, but is insufficient to provide the depth pressure by absorption and dilution.
of instruction required by personnel. Current regulations,
operating procedures, and technical information must be
consulted for the safe use of propellants. 4. Storage and Handling
Anhydrous ammonia is transferred and stored as a lique-
A. Ammonia fied, compressed gas and is relatively easy to handle with
readily available equipment designed for ammonia ser-
Liquid anhydrous ammonia is a commercial chemical, vice. Storage and transfer areas must be well ventilated,
used for refrigeration and as a fertilizer. It is very stable free from oxidizers, flammable materials, excessive heat,
and is not shock sensitive. Being alkaline and a reducing and sparks.
agent, ammonia will react with most acids. It is soluble in Ammonia may be stored in shipping cylinders or in non-
water, alcohol, and many other solvents. refrigerated bulk storage tanks. Care must be taken to pre-
vent overfilling containers. A tank is considered overfull
1. Specifications when at any time there is insufficient vapor space above
the liquid to provide adequately for the thermal expansion
Propellant-grade ammonia procured under Specification of the liquid as ambient temperatures fluctuate.
O-A-445 contains 99.8 wt% NH3 . The major impurity is
water that is limited to a maximum of 0.5 wt% to reduce
corrosion. Excessive oil will deposit in engine passages 5. Transportation
and foul igniters, thus it is controlled to 5.0 ppmw (parts
Commercially available cylinders, rail tank cars, and cargo
per million weight) maximum. The purity of ammonia
or portable tanks of various sizes that meet U. S. Depart-
produced in the United States is consistently high. In the
ment of Transportation (DOT) specifications are used for
amounts normally present in refrigeration grade ammonia,
shipping anhydrous ammonia. DoT classifies ammonia as
pyridine, naphthalene, and hydrogen sulfide were found
a nonflammable gas for shipments because the concen-
not to adversely affect rocket engine performance.
tration range of flammability is narrow and the ignition
temperature is high.
2. Material Compatibility
Anhydrous ammonia will not corrode iron, steel, or alu- B. Chlorine Pentafluoride
minum. Since it is difficult to avoid some moisture in op-
erational systems, copper, zinc, and their alloys should not Chlorine pentafluoride (ClF5 ) is a colorless gas under nor-
be used. The use of nickel and stainless steel (300 and 400 mal conditions. It can be maintained as a liquid under
series) is recommended. its own vapor pressure, 58.8 psia (405.2 kN/m2 ) at 77◦ F
Suitable nonmetallic materials for anhydrous ammonia (298.2 K). CLF5 is a very strong oxidizing agent that is
❤ hypergolic with common rocket fuels and will react vigor-
service are tetrafluoroethylene polymer (Teflon™ ), chlo-
™❤ ously with water and most combustibles. It is not sensitive
rotrifluoroethylene (Kel-F ), ammonia-resistant rubber,
and asbestos (free of graphite and grease). to heat, shock, or sparks.
The information presented in this section also applies
to chlorine trifluoride (ClF3 ) and similar interhalogen ox-
3. Safety Considerations idizers.
Anhydrous ammonia must be handled with caution be-
cause it is a toxic, flammable compound shipped and
1. Specifications
stored under pressure. The principal hazards to person-
nel are inhalation of the vapor and contact of the liquid The principle impurity in ClF5 and ClF3 is hydrogen fluo-
and vapor with skin and eyes. Liquid ammonia produces ride (HF), which causes corrosion and particulate forma-
severe burns on contact due to its caustic action and low tion. The typical assay is product: 99.8 wt% minimum and
temperature. Gaseous ammonia is a strong irritant and HF: 0.2 wt% maximum. The procurement specifications,
can injure the eyes and respiratory tract. The TLV is 50 MIL-P-27413 (ClF5 ) and MIL-P-27411 (ClF3 ), were re-
ppm. The flammability range of ammonia in air is 16 to cently canceled.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
2. Material Compatibility 5. Handling and Storage

In a clean, dry, passivated system, ClF5 is compatible with ClF5 is stored and transferred as a liquefied gas. Tanks
a wide range of metals. However, at elevated temperatures, should meet the ASME code for unfired pressure ves-
it will react with them. It is important not to have any sels. Remote-operated, packless-type valves with metal-
sources of ignition, such as contaminants, metal-to-metal to-metal seats should be used. Suitable diaphragm-type
friction (as in a valve), or mechanical impact sufficient pumps are commercially available for the interhalogens.
to deform metal. The following metals have been success- Soft copper and 1100 aluminum may be used for gaskets
fully used: 1160, 3003, 6061, 2024, 5052, 6063 aluminum; at flanged fittings; however, all-welded connections are
❤ ❤
Inconel™ , Monel™ , nickel; stainles steel, all; and copper, recommended.
brass, and carbon steel.
The following metals should not be used in contact with 6. Transportation
ClF3 or ClF5 : titanium, tantalium, niobium, and tungsten.
There are no elastomers or plastic materials suitable for The interhalogens are shipped in mild steel cylinders meet-
liquid flow or high pressure systems. For low gaseous flow ing DOT specifications. The largest containers presently
rates where pressures are under 400 psig (2.76 MN/m2 ) approved have a product capacity of 2000 lb (907 kg).
or static liquid systems, polytetrafluoroethylene (e.g.,
❤
Teflon™ , Halon, TFE) may be used. These materials C. Fluorine
must be properly cleaned and dried, and no hydrocarbon,
Fluorine is the strongest oxidizing agent and one of the
alcohol, or halogenated solvents used. The solvents can
most reactive substances known. Under certain conditions,
penetrate into the plastic and are impossible to remove
it can react with most elements and compounds, the excep-
completely.
tions being some of the rare gases and completely fluori-
The use of all lubricants, including fluorocarbons, are
nated compounds. If kept free of moisture, which reacts to
prohibited.
form HF, fluorine is noncorrosive to clean and passivated
metals. Liquefied fluorine is hypergolic with all rocket fu-
3. Safety Considerations els. Gaseous fluorine has a yellowish color, and the liquid
While they do not burn or explode by themselves, ClF3 and is amber. It has a very pungent odor. Fluorine is stable and
ClF5 must be considered fire hazards due to their ability to liquid is completely miscible with liquefied oxygen and
ignite most materials. The TLV-C for ClF3 is 0.1 ppm: no nitrogen.
official value has been established for ClF5 , but 3.0 ppm
has been suggested. 1. Specifications
Fluorine procured under MIL-P-27405 has a minimum as-
4. Cleaning and Passivation
say of 99.0 vol%. Oxygen and nitrogen are the major im-
All equipment in contact with the interhalogens must be purities (0.8% maximum) with some CF4 and CO2 (0.2%
scrupulously cleaned and passivated. All grease solvents, maximum) present. HF is the most troublesome impurity,
scale, weld spatter, and moisture must be removed. All causing container corrosion and forming particulate mat-
components must be completely disassembled to assure ter. HF is limited to 0.5% maximum, with 0.2% a typical
that no dead areas containing the slightest residue are value. In liquefied fluorine, HF is a solid and can be re-
overlooked. Every square inch of the system must be pas- moved by filtration. Ozone and peroxides, formed during
sivated with a tenacious fluoride coating that protects the the electrolytic manufacturing process, are removed at the
surface against further attack by the interhalogen. Passi- plant.
vation is accomplished by exposing the system to a mix-
ture of fluorine and nitrogen or helium gas. The partial
pressure of fluorine is gradually increased until the sys-
tem is 100% filled with gaseous fluorine at the work- Materials selected for fluorine service must be resistant
ing pressure of the system. The system may get very to attack by fluorine and possess appropriate strength at
hot and even burn through if the pressure of fluorine is cryogenic temperatures.
raised too quickly. Even after the system was passivated, The following metals are recommended for use in liq-
these propellants have been known to burn through as they uefied fluorine systems: nickel, aluminum, copper, brass,
❤
flow through any tight turns such as a standard elbow. Monel™ , 304L, and 316 and 321 stainless steel. In addi-
Only long radius tube bends will turn the flow of these tion to these, mild steel is satisfactory for gaseous fluorine
propellants. from 20 to 160◦ F (244 to 344 K).
P1: GPJ Final Pages
There are no plastic or elastomeric materials accept- to low temperature strength. The outer vacuum jacket
❤
able for liquefied fluorine under flow conditions or for may contain insulation such as perlite or Santocel™ . As
high-pressure gaseous fluorine. Under moderate flow rates long as the liquefied nitrogen is replenished, the fluorine
❤
and low pressure polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon™ ) may will keep indefinitely in the liquid state.
be used. It is very important to assure that clean, high No pressure relief devices are to be inserted in the
❤
quality Teflon™ (no metallic impurities from the extru- inner fluorine tank. The liquefied nitrogen jacket will
sion process) is used. Since it is very difficult to remove be equipped with vents and a pressure relief system
solvents that may have impregnated the plastic, solvent typical of liquefied nitrogen systems. Remote-operated,
cleaning should not the used. packless-type valves designed for fluorine service should
be used. All-welded connections are recommended and
threaded connections should be avoided. Flanges or com-
3. Safety Considerations
pression fittings require soft copper or aluminum gaskets,
Fluorine is very toxic (TLV 1.0 ppm). Contact with the rings, or seals. Liquefied fluorine has been pumped satis-
vapor will cause some irritation and burns. Liquefied flu- factorily; however, suitable pumps are not generally avail-
orine will destroy body tissues on contact. Under spill able. Transfer can be accomplished by using 1–5 psi (7–
conditions, liquefied fluorine will react with essentially 35 kN/m2 ) differential helium pressure.
all materials, usually causing a fire; thus it must be called
a fire hazard. Uncontrolled mixing of liquefied fluorine
6. Transportation
and rocket fuels as in a spill situation will produce severe
deflagrations. Liquefied fluorine is shipped in tank trucks that hold
5000 lbs (2268) kg/lbs of product. Special DOT permits
are required These truck trailers are of the three concen-
4. Cleaning and Passivation
tric shell design described in Section IV.C.4. The liquefied
Proper cleaning and passivation of fluorine systems is the nitrogen volume is sufficient to last at least 10 days with-
key to successful operation. During the passivation pro- out replenishment, more than adequate for cross-country
cess, a tightly adhering film of metal fluoride is formed shipments.
on the interior surfaces to protect the metal from further
fluorine attack. Components should be disassembled and
D. Hydrazines
plastic parts removed. All contaminants, especially hydro-
carbons, must be removed with solvents and detergents. The widely used hydrazines, anhydrous hydrazine, MMH,
Scale, slag, and weld beads are removed by sand blasting UDMH, and the 50% hydrazine/50% UDMH blend
and acid pickling. Deionized or distilled water is used as a (Aerozine-50) are clear, colorless, oily liquids with dis-
final rinse, and the equipment dried with heated nitrogen tinctively fishy ammoniacal odor. These strong reducing
gas. The system is reassembled and purged with nitrogen. agents are completely miscible with water, alcohols, and
Passivation is accomplished by slowly replacing the most solvents. They are very hygroscopic, and tend to
nitrogen with gaseous fluorine at atmospheric pressure. absorb carbon dioxide and oxygen from the atmosphere.
After this nitrogen is replaced, the pressure is increased These fuels are hypergolic with the common storable
slowly to the operational pressure and left under observa- rocket oxidizers. Chemically, hydrazine is the most re-
tion for about two hours. If there is no internal heating, active of the family, and extra care must be exercised in
the system is considered passivated. handling. All are stable to friction and shock but are ther-
modynamically unstable. Iron, nickel, cobalt, copper, and
platinum metals and their oxides will catalytically decom-
5. Storage and Handling
pose hydrazine and MMH.
Liquefied fluorine is always kept in a closed system under
a low positive pressure to avoid release of its vapors to
1. Specifications
the atmosphere. Refrigeration is required that is usually
supplied by the boil-off of liquefied nitrogen. Special The military specifications covering these fuels are
tanks are used and constructed with three horizontal, hydrazine, MIL-P-26536; MMH, MIL-P-27404; 50–50
concentric shells. The inner shell holds the product, blend, MH-P-27402; and UDMH, MIL-P-25604. Typi-
an intermediate shell contains liquefied nitrogen, and cally the fuel assay is 98 wt% or better, with the major
❤
the outer shell serves as a vacuum jacket. Monel™ is impurities being water and other amines. Impurities in hy-
the preferred material for the two inner shells, although drazine can adversely affect its stability and can damage
stainless steel may be used if proper consideration is given catalysts when it is used as a monopropellant. Thus for the
P1: GPJ Final Pages
monopropellant grade hydrazine the following contami- keep out air and moisture. Transfer of fuels may be ac-
nants are controlled: carbon dioxide, 30 ppm maximum; complished with pumps or differential pressure, and ar-
aniline, 0.5 wt% maximum; iron, 20 ppm maximum; chlo- eas must be free of organic and oxidizing materials and
ride, 5 ppm maximum; nonvolatile residue, 50 ppm max- rust. There must be no open fires or electrical sparks
imum; and others (MMH, alcohol), 200 ppm maximum. present although as noted above, spontaneous ignition is
common.
Hydrazine has been observed to undergo explosive de-
composition by rapid adiabatic compression of vapors
The hydrazines are noncorrosive to most metals. Because when subjected to high hydrodynamic pressure (water
of catalytic effects, only known materials should be used. hammer).
Recommended metals and alloys include: 304, 304L, 316,
347, and 17–7PH stainless steel; 1100, 2014, 2024, 2219,
5. Transportation
5052, and 6061 aluminum; 6A1–4V titanium. The follow-
ing metals should be avoided: cadmium, cobalt, copper The hydrazines are shipped in DOT-approved tank trucks,
and alloys, iron, lead, magnesium, mild steel, and zinc. rail cars, portable tanks, and 55-gal (m3 ) drums. Red
A limited number of elastomers and plastics are suit- “Flammable Liquid” and white “Poison” labels are re-
able for hydrazine family use: AF-E-332; butyl rubber; quired.
ethylene-propylene copolymer; and polytetrafluoroethy-
❤
lene. Viton™ and chlorotrifluoroethylene should not be
E. Hydrogen
used except for short exposures.
No lubricant is completely satisfactory. The following Liquefied hydrogen is transparent, colorless, and odorless.
have been used: Apiezon L, Dow Corning Silicon Com- Because of its very low boiling point, release of liquefied
pound 11, Fluorolube GR-470, Kel-F grease, Krytox PR- hydrogen in a normal atmosphere will result in a visible,
240AC, and Ready Lube 200. voluminous cloud of condensed moisture. Hydrogen is
noncorrosive, but some metals are subject to hydrogen em-
brittlement, especially at higher temperatures. Hydrogen
gases are combustible with air over the range of 4–75 vol%
The hydrazines are toxic and and will irritate eyes and at 68◦ F (293 K). Mixtures of hydrogen with air from 18
skin. They can be absorbed by inhalation, through the to 59% by volume will detonate. Liquefied or gaseous
skin, and by ingestion. The TLVs are hydrazine; 0.1 ppm; hydrogen is hypergolic with liquefied and gaseous fluo-
MMH, 0.2 ppm; and UDMH, 0.5 ppm. They are sus- rine, chlorine trifluoride, and chlorine pentafluoride, and
pected carcinogens. The hydrazines will not explode, but will form combustible mixtures with other oxidizers. All
the vapors will make explosive mixtures with air. They substances are essentially insoluble in liquefied hydrogen.
are flammable in a broad range of concentrations in air: Helium is slightly soluble, up to ∼1% under pressure.
hydrazine. 4.7–100% MMH, 2.5–98%; and UDMH, 2.0– Liquefied hydrogen is chemically stable, but it is physi-
90%. Spills of these fuels on rags, dirt, rust, sawdust, and cally stable only when stored under suitable conditions. In
so on can result in spontaneous ignition. Because of the a properly designed container, the evaporation rate can be
ease of ignition, it is common in the vicinity of an open as low as 1.5% per day in a 1000-gal (3.79 m3 ) container,
container or a spill to have tongues of flame appear. This and less in larger vessels.
phenomenon is more apparent at night.
1. Specifications
Liquefied hydrogen conforming to MIL-P-27201 has an
Storage tanks with capacities up to 20,000 gal (75.7 m3 ) assay of 99.995 vol% H2 minimum and a minimum con-
and meeting the ASME Code for Unfired Pressure Ves- version to 95.0 vol% parahydrogen. Oxygen and hydro-
sels are used for the hydrazines. Type 304 stainless steel carbon gases are limited to a maximum of 1.0 ppmv (parts
is commonly used. For small volumes, the 55-gal (0.2 m3 ) per million volume) each. Up to 48.0 ppmv of inert gases
shipping drums may be used for storage. All containers (e.g., He, N2 ) is permitted.
must be thoroughly cleaned and inspected to assure that
no catalytic materials are present. All air is purged from
containers and piping with an inert gas, usually nitrogen,
prior to filling with fuel. An inert gas blanket of a slight A prime consideration for materials selection for lique-
positive pressure is maintained at all times in systems to fied hydrogen service is the ability to retain satisfactory
P1: GPJ Final Pages
physical properties at the liquefied hydrogen boiling point. of air. Only vaporized gas from liquefied hydrogen should
Materials must be able to withstand the high thermal be used; the impurities present in most cylinder H2 make
stresses imposed by large and rapid temperature changes. it unsuitable for this purpose. All lines should be vacuum
Many iron alloys, for example, lose their ductility and be- jacketed or insulated.
come brittle.
Recommended metals for liquefied hydrogen service
5. Transportation
include: 300 and other austenitic series of stainless
❤
steel; copper, brass, and bronze; aluminum; Monel™ ; and DOT classifies liquefied hydrogen as a flammable com-
❤
Everdur™ . pressed gas. Rail tank cars, tank trucks, and small cylin-
All plastics and elastomeric materials lose their flexi- ders holding about 200 lb (91 kg) of product are used for
bility at liquefied hydrogen temperatures. Some materi- shipping liquefied hydrogen. These containers are vacuum
als successfully used in applications are polyester fiber jacketed and insulated and are equipped with pressure re-
❤ ❤
(Dacron™ ); tetrafluoroethylene (Teflon™ or equivalent); lief devices. A red “Flammable Gas” label is required.
❤
chlorotrifluoroethylene, unplasticized (Kel-F ™ ); nylon;
™❤
Mylar ; and asbestos impregnated with TFE.
F. Hydrogen Peroxide
Lubricants solidify at liquefied hydrogen temperatures
and are not generally used. In some special applications, Concentrated hydrogen peroxide is both a strong oxidiz-
vacuum grease can be used as a sealant with O-rings. ing agent and a monopropellant. It is a clear, colorless
liquid that is slightly more viscous than water. Some gas
evolution can be seen. It can be rapidly decomposed upon
contact with many inorganic compounds, including iron
Hydrogen is extremely flammable. Unless carbonaceous oxide, silver, and potassium permanganate. This contact
impurities or other contaminants are present, the flame yields water (steam), oxygen, and heat. Hydrogen perox-
may be invisible. Explosive hazards exist when frozen air ide will not burn, but will support combustion of many or-
(oxygen) collects in liquefied hydrogen, and when gaseous ganic materials. The exothermic decomposition reaction
hydrogen is mixed with air in a confined space. Skin con- releases sufficient heat to ignite combustible materials. It
tact with liquefied hydrogen or with equipment containing is hypergolic with amine fuels, including the hydrazines,
it can cause severe frostbite. Air in contact with lines and and the metal hydrides. It is considered hypergolic with
tanks can liquefy and produce an oxygen-rich environ- hydrocarbon fuels; however, the heat release rate is in-
ment. Hydrogen is an asphyxiant, but it is not toxic. sufficient to provide reliable ignition in a rocket engine
with out the use of some other ignition system. For this
reason, a two-stage engine concept is used in which the
peroxide is first catalytically decomposed and the hot
Liquefied hydrogen may be stored in stationary or mobile gases injected into the rocket engine chamber with the
tanks of appropriate design and materials and tested in ac- fuel.
cordance with ASME or DOT specifications for pressure
vessels. The tanks are vacuum insulated, and evacuated
❤ 1. Specifications
perlite, Santocel™ , or multilayer super insulation is usually
used. Liquefied hydrogen systems are kept under positive Hydrogen peroxide conforming to MIL-P-16005 (recently
pressure to prevent entry of air. The internal structure sup- cancelled) has an assay of 90.0–91.0 wt%. Impurities that
porting the inner hydrogen tank within the vacuum shell promote decomposition must be avoided if good stor-
is made as light as possible to reduce thermal leaks. Be- age life is to be obtained; however, stabilizers or catalyst
cause the density of liquefied hydrogen is very low, this poisons cannot be tolerated if catalyst packs are not to
internal structure is considerably lighter than for tanks fail prematurely. For this reason, specific impurities are
designed for other commodities. This weight restriction closely controlled to provide reasonable storage stabil-
must be observed when liquefied nitrogen is used for pre- ity and to avoid poisoning of catalysts. Dissolved metals
cooling and purging or if the container is used for another can cause homogeneous decomposition. Hydrogen perox-
product. ide stability is determined by holding a sample at 100◦ C
Liquefied hydrogen systems must be thoroughly (373.15 K) for 24 hr. A maximum of 5% active oxy-
cleaned to remove all oils and surface films, rust, weld gen loss is permitted. Aluminum content is controlled
scale, and other particulate matter and then dried to elimi- to 0.5 mg/1 (g/m3 ). Chloride was found to cause corro-
nate all moisture. Prior to use, the system must be purged sion of containers, thus it is controlled to a maximum of
with warm hydrogen or helium gas to remove all traces 1.0 mg/1 (g/m3 ), and 3–5 mg/1 (g/m3 ) of nitrate is added as
P1: GPJ Final Pages
a corrosion inhibitor. Phosphate is a strong catalyst poison it has a TLV of 1 ppm, toxicity is generally not a problem
that enters during manufacture. Since it cannot be entirely due to its low vapor pressure.
eliminated at a reasonable cost, 1.0–4.0 mg/1 (g/m3 ) tin
(as stannous chloride) is added to offset its effects. Sul-
4. Cleaning Procedures
fate, also a catalyst poison, is limited to 3.0 mg/1 (g/m3 )
maximum. Extensive studies have shown that up to 200 All containers, components, and surfaces that are sub-
ppm carbonaceous materials (residuals from the principal ject to exposure to hydrogen peroxide must be clean and
manufacturing processes) have no detrimental effect on passivated. All equipment must be disassembled and alu-
stability, catalysts, or engine performance. minum, stainless steel, and plastic parts separated. Metal
components are degreased with trichloroethylene (or other
approved solvents or detergents) and then rinsed with al-
cohol and then with distilled or deionized water. Stain-
In selecting materials for hydrogen peroxide equipment less parts are pickled with 70% nitric acid, and aluminum
and systems, the effect that the hydrogen peroxide will parts are treated with a 25% sodium hydroxide solution
have on the material is much less important than the effect followed by a 45% solution of nitric acid. After a thorough
the material may have on the peroxide. Only materials that rinse with deionized water, the components are passivated
have been found compatible by actual test should be used. by filling large equipment and immersing small parts in
Aluminum 1060, 1260, 5254, and 5652 are suitable for 70–90% hydrogen peroxide for 4 hr and the decomposition
long-term contact with hydrogen peroxide, as in storage rate of the hydrogen peroxide noted. If extensive decom-
tanks and related piping. position is observed, the part is recleaned or discarded.
In general, 300-series stainless steel (347 preferred) and Plastic materials are cleaned and passivated in a similar
aluminum 1100, 3003, and 6061 are usable for rocket en- manner; however, it is best to degrease with detergents
gine components and test facilities where the contact with rather than solvents.
hydrogen peroxide does not exceed four weeks a normal
temperatures or a few hours at about 160◦ F (344 K).
5. Handling and Storage
Some other common aluminum alloys and stainless
steels may be used when the contact is less than one hour Horizontal-type aluminum storage tanks are normally
prior to use, as in engine valves, feed lines, and injectors. used for hydrogen peroxide. All storage tanks must be
Of the nonmetals, only polytetrafluoroethylene vented and a vent filter used to prevent dirt from entering
❤ ❤
(Teflon™ ) and chlorotrifluoroethylene (Kel-F ™ ) are the the tank. The 30-gal (0.11 m3 ) aluminum shipping drums
only plastics suitable for extended contact with hy- are suitable for storage containers when small quantities
drogen peroxide. A number of materials, including poly- are involved. Shielding of the containers from the rays of
❤
ethylene, selected silicone rubbers, Viton™ A, and poly- the sun is desirable. Good housekeeping is essential to
vinyl chloride, can be used for limited exposures. Caution minimize fire hazards and to provide a safe work area.
must be exercised since the quality of these products vary All storage and transfer areas, as well as surrounding ar-
greatly and not all samples are safe to use. The amount eas that may be reached by leakage or spills, should be
and type of plasticizers and previous exposure to solvents cleared of organic matter and combustibles. All contain-
can have a profound effect of compatibility. ers, piping, and equipment that will be in contact with
❤
Chlorofluoro oils and greases (e.g., Halocarbon™ , hydrogen peroxide must be of appropriate materials and
™❤
Kel-F ) are suitable for limited use with hydrogen per- thoroughly cleaned and passivated before use. A wide va-
oxide but should not be used with aluminum. riety of valves, pumps, gauges, and transfer equipment are
commercially available, but care must be exercised in their
selection. Transfer of hydrogen peroxide may be accom-
plished by pumping, by vacuuming, or by pressuring with
Hydrogen peroxide may ignite combustible materials on clean, dry nitrogen.
contact, including dry vegetation and ordinary clothing.
Contamination, such as rust, dirt, metal filings, and so
6. Transportation
on, can cause rapid decomposition, releasing oxygen and
considerable heat. The evolution of oxygen and steam may DOT classifies hydrogen peroxide as a corrosive liquid
overwhelm any venting system causing the container to and requires a white label during shipment. Rail tank cars,
rupture. up to 8000 gal (30.28 m3 ); tank motor vehicles, 4000 gal
Hydrogen peroxide will irritate skin, eyes, and the res- (15.14 m3 ); and 30-gal (0.11 m3 ) drums that meet DOT
piratory system. Extended contact will cause burns. While specifications are used for hydrogen peroxide shipments.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
Two types of drums are available: a double-head drum contact with fluorine and chlorine trifluoride, it is not hy-
suitable for all freight shipments and a single-head pergolic with most rocket oxidizers. Kerosine will react
drum approved only for full carload and full truckload with nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide, and strong oxidizers
shipments. with evolution of heat and may ignite. Such mixtures of
Hydrogen peroxide is commonly shipped at 70% con- kerosine and oxidizers are likely to be sensitive to shock,
centration as a feed stock for manufacture of semicon- heat, and sparks. The flash point is 110◦ F (316.5 K). Kero-
ductors. Uses as a rocket oxidizer are above 90%. X-L sine is a moderate skin irritant; scaling and fissuring of
Space Systems offers on-site concentrators to avoid ship- skin can result from frequent contact. Inhalation of vapors
ment of the higher concentrations. Degussa-Hus Inc. will can cause narcosis. The toxicity of kerosine (TLV) is a
ship concentrations up to 87.5%. function of the aromatic content, e.g., benzene.
G. Kerosine 4. Storage and Handling

Propellant-grade kerosine, formerly called RP-1, is a high- Huge quantities o f hydrocarbon fuels are used through-
boiling hydrocarbon fraction. It is a clear liquid, with a out the world. The same equipment and procedures may
slight red color from an added dye. It is very similar to JP-4 be used for propellant-grade kerosine, with due precau-
turbine engine fuel but with a controlled aromatic content. tions taken to minimize corrosion and contamination. Fire
It is chemically stable and is insensitive to shock. Kero- protection is the major concern in facility design. All sta-
sine, like gasoline and diesel and jet fuel, reacts only with tionary and mobile tanks should be grounded, electrical
strong oxidizers or under high temperatures and pressures. devices must be explosion proof, and all vents protected
High temperatures, especially in the presence of air can with flame arresters. Buildings are to be constructed of
accelerate the formation of gum and sediment. Like other fire-resistant materials, and the area kept free of all vege-
hydrocarbons, kerosine is flammable, and its vapor will tation and combustible debris.
form explosive mixtures with air. It has a fairly low vapor
pressure. It is insoluble in water, and it is an excellient
5. Transportation
solvent and is soluble in many organic solvents.
Kerosine is classified by DOT as a “Flammable Liquid.”
Standard petroleum rail cars and tank trucks are commonly
1. Specifications
used for shipping.
The major characteristics of kerosine defined by MIL-
P-25576 are distillation, 10% point, 365–410◦ F (458.2–
H. Nitric Acid
483.2 K); end point, 535◦ F (552.6 K) maximum; residue,
1.5 vol% maximum; gravity, 42.0–45.0◦ API; aromatics: Although fuming nitric acid is a commercial chemical,
5.0 vol% maximum; olefins, 1.0 vol% maximum; and par- special formulations are used as rocket oxidizers. White
ticulate: 1.5 mg/1 (g/m3 ) maximum. fuming nitric acid (100% HNO3 ) is unstable, dissociating
to NO2 and water [Eq. (14)], and very corrosive, attacking
most metals. The addition of NO2 , HF, and water greatly
improves nitric acid storability, making it a valuable pro-
A wide range of ferrous and nonferrous alloys is suitable pellant. White fuming nitric acid is colorless, but becomes
for storage and shipping containers and associated com- deep yellow to reddish brown as NO2 forms. The current
ponents. rocket propellant grades are a dense reddish brown. Fum-
Only petroleum-resistant plastics and elastomers are to ing nitric acid is hypergolic with the hydrazines and most
be used with kerosine. Some suitable nonmetals are cork, amine fuels. It will react with water and many organic
fluorocarbons, asbestos, polyvinylchloride, nitrile rubber, materials with evolution of heat and NO2 gas.
❤ ❤
Buna™ -N, Neoprene™ , and polyethylene.
Graphite-based, molybdenum disulfide, some silicon,
1. Specifications
and fluorocarbon lubricants may be used. Kerosine will
dissolve petroleum-type lubricants. Current propellant-grade nitric acid formulations, pre-
sented in Table X, are procured under specification MIL-
P-7254. The composition of Type IIIA was selected to pro-
vide the greatest stability and minimum corrosion. Type
Kerosine vapors will form ignitable mixtures with air, as IIIB has a lower aluminum salt content otherwise it is
does gasoline and diesel fuel. While it will ignite upon identical to Type IIIA. The lower water content of Type
P1: GPJ Final Pages
IIILS (for limited storability) trades storability for a little less steel components are also pickled with a dilute nitric
higher performance, again for a special application where acid/HF solution. Precautions must be taken to avoid gal-
long storage life is not important. Type IV has the highest vanic corrosion when dissimilar metals are used in a sys-
specific impulse and density, but is more corrosive. tem. Chemical type pumps are used for nitric acid transfer.
Pressure transfers are not recommended.
5. Transportation
Aluminum is the material of choice for fuming nitric acid
when maximum storability and minimum metal attack Only aluminum containers are used for cargo truck, rail
is needed. The following aluminum alloys are recom- car, and drum shipments of fuming nitric acid. An “Oxi-
mended: 1060, 1100, 3003, 3004, 6061, 5052, and 5154. dizer” and a “Poison” label are required by DOT.
Fabrication of tanks and equipment from stainless steel
requires care. Crevices that are hard to clean should be I. Nitrogen Tetroxide
avoided. To avoid loss of corrosion resistance, weld areas
in unstabilized grades must be annealed to redissolve the Nitrogen tetroxide is the most widely used storable liquid
chromium carbides and rapidly quenched. These stainless oxidizer. N2 O4 is in temperature equilibrium with NO2 . It
steel alloys have been found satisfactory: 303, 304ELC, is the NO2 that produces the dense reddish-brown color
❤ associated with this oxidizer in both the liquid and gaseous
316, 347, 321, 19–9DL, and Durimet ™ 20.
Fuming nitric acid severely corrodes copper and its al- forms. As the temperature is lowered, the equilibrium
loys and reacts violently with titanium. shifts toward N2 O4 and the color changes from reddish
Polytetrafluoroethylene and polychlorotrifluoroethy- to straw tan to a very pale yellow. At the normal boiling
lene are the only nonmetals resistant to fuming nitric acid. point (70.1◦ F; 294.3 K), the mixture contains about 15%
The perfluorocarbon type lubricants are also satisfactory. NO2 and essentially 100% at 302◦ F (423.2 K). Near the
freezing point, the liquid becomes colorless. The MONs,
mixed oxides of nitrogen, contain NO with the numerical
3. Safety Considerations designation representing the nominal NO content. Com-
Fuming nitric acid will not burn and is stable to impact, positions MON-1 and MON-3 contain NO as a stress cor-
sparks, and shock, but it may form explosive mixtures with rosion inhibitor, and composition MON-10 and higher as a
kerosine, other hydrocarbons, and alcohols. It will react freezing point depressant. The nitric oxide complexes with
with many organic materials and may ignite them. In an the NO2 to form N2 O3 , a blue substance, which imparts a
improperly prepared container or at elevated temperatures, greenish color to the nitrogen tetroxide; hence the terms
internal pressure buildup may occur. The TLV for nitric “green” N2 O4 (for the MONs) and “red-brown” N2 O4 (no
acid is 2 ppm. Nitric acid fires and spills can be controlled nitric oxide) are frequently used. MON-1 is the commonly
with copious amounts of water. The residues then should used composition. MON-3 is specified for the Space Shut-
be neutralized with sodium carbonate. Water will cause an tle to assure that throughout handling, servicing, and flight
exothermic reaction with nitric acid, causing the evolution operations, the NO content remains above the 0.4% needed
of large amounts of NO2 ; however, high-pressure water for stress corrosion protection. Neat N2 O4 (NTO) was used
fog will contain the fumes. A special water-based foam in the Titan II missile.
consisting of acrylic surfactants and pectin is also available MONs with the higher levels of NO will have higher
for fume suppression. vapor pressure. Otherwise, the safety, material compati-
bility, and handling characteristics for all of the MONs are
similar and are treated alike in this section.
Aluminum and stainless steel tanks meeting ASTM Boiler 1. Specifications
and Pressure Vessel Codes, equipped with pressure relief MIL-P-26539 covers the procurement of N2 O4 (grade
devices, are used for fuming nitric acid storage, with alu- NTO), MON-1, and MON-3. The requirements are pre-
minum 11,000 gal (41.64 m3 ) tanks being the most de- sented in Table XVI. MON-15 and MON-25 are also pro-
sirable. The 55-gal (0.2 m3 ) shipping drums may also be cured under this specification.
used for storage if in a covered area. Storage areas must
be free of all vegetation and combustible material and be
surrounded by a dike. Tanks and components in contact
with acid must be thoroughly cleaned, degreased, deter- Moisture-free N2 O4 and MONs are noncorrosive. The fol-
gent cleaned, and all scale and weld slag removed. Stain- lowing metals are suitable for most purposes: aluminum,
P1: GPJ Final Pages
TABLE XVI Nitrogen Tetroxide Specification Requirements the MONs and will rapidly clog filters. The small amount
(Chemical Composition Limits)a of iron that does dissolve complexes with the N2 O4 to form
[N2 O+ −
3 ] [Fe(NO3 )4 ]. This adduct can precipitate in valves
Requirement NTO MON-1 MON-3 and small orifices to cause a phenomenon called “flow
decay.” Users often condition the oxidizer by cooling to
N2 O4 assay (wt%) 99.5–100.0 — —
40◦ F (278 K) and filtering through a 2 µm filter. Subse-
Nitric content (wt%) — 0.6–1.0 2.5–3.0
quent storage in stainless steel will slow down the for-
Water equivalent (wt%) 0.17 0.17 0.17
mation of the “flow decay” adduct, but not eliminate it.
Chloride (wt% max.) 0.040 0.040 0.040
Propellant-feed systems of titanium or aluminum are used
Particulate (mg/1 max) 10 10 10
in missiles and satellites where mission life approaches
Iron (ppm max.) — — 0.5
20 years.
a From National Aerospace Standard 3620. Pump transfer is recommended for nitrogen tetroxide
and the MONs. Storage and transfer areas must be kept
❤
free of oils, fuels, and combustibles.
carbon steel, Inconel™ , nickel, stainless steels, and tita-
nium. N2 O4 and the MONs react readily with moisture to
form acids. For this reason the use of titanium or 300-series 5. Transportation
CRES are highly recommended for long-term storage and N2 O4 and the MONs are transported in specially con-
propellant-feed systems. Of the non-metals, the following structed semitrailers, rail cars, and in high-pressure, seam-
have been found satisfactory: asbestos, cotton and oil-free; less steel cylinders. Carbon steel equipment can be used,
AFE-124R elastomer; ceramic, acid-resistant; polyte- but the trend is to use stainless steel. The DOT classifica-
trafluoroethylene: and polychlorotrifluoroethylene. Flu- tion is Class A Poison Gas and a white label is required.
❤
orocarbon lubricants and Teflon™ tape may also be used.
3. Safety Considerations J. Otto Fuel II
N2 O4 (NO2 ) is a toxic gas, with a TLV of 3 ppm. It re- Otto Fuel II is a very stable monopropellant, developed
acts exothermically with water to form nitric and nitrous to provide a safe fuel for use in undersea weapons. It is
acids, with an evolution of NO2 gas. The MONs are hyper- a bright red, oily liquid, insoluble in water but is soluble
golic with the hydrazines and most amine fuels. They will in most common solvents. Otto Fuel is thermally stable at
react with many organic materials and may form explo- 122◦ F (323 K). Very slow decomposition may occur above
sive mixtures with hydrocarbon fuels and partially halo- 150◦ F (339 K), and above 290◦ F (416 K) rapid exothermic
genated solvents. While these oxidizers will not burn, they decomposition leading to container rupture and fire will
will support combustion. The MONs are thermally stable occur.
and are not sensitive to mechanical impact. They will not
explode. 1. Specifications
Because of the volatility of the MONs, most leaks and
spills will result in the formation of vapors. Water added Otto Fuel II is composed of a desensitized nitrate ester.
to a pool of N2 O4 will greatly increase vapor evolution; The composition of Otto Fuel II is given in Table XV, and
however, high-pressure water fog will suppress the fum- is covered by Specification MIL-O-82672(OS).
ing, but must be applied until the N2 O4 liquid is suffi-
ciently diluted. Special foams have been developed that
are effective in suppressing the vapors for about 10 min. 2. Material Compatibility
Most common metals, except those containing copper, are
suitable for Otto Fuel service. The following nonmetals
are satisfactory for contact with Otto Fuel: Butyl rub-
The nitrogen oxides may be stored in mild steel tanks ber: ethylenepropylene rubber; glass; polyethylene; poly-
conforming to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel tetrafluoroethylene; polychlorotrifluoroethylene; and nat-
❤ ❤
Code. Shipping cylinders are also used for storage con- ural rubber. Buna-N, Neopren™ , and Viton™ will swell in
tainers. Pressure relief devices are required. Because small contact with Otto Fuel. Polysulfide rubber is incompati-
amounts of water will form nitric acid and cause corro- ble. Most fluorocarbon and silicon-based oils and greases
sion, the trend is to use stainless steel tanks and transfer are acceptable. Petroleum-based lubricants are not recom-
equipment. Iron corrosion products are very insoluble in mended.
P1: GPJ Final Pages
3. Safety Considerations ability to withstand stress resulting from rapid temperature

changes is especially important. The following metals are
This propellant offers outstanding safety characteristics.
suitable for liquefied oxygen service: stainless steel—304,
Under atmospheric conditions, it is considered to be non-
304L, 304ELC, 310, 316, 321; aluminum alloys—1000,
flammable and nonexplosive, making it safe to handle with
2014, 2024, 3000, 5050, 5052, 5083, 5154, 6061, 6063,
proper precautions. The propellant has a high flash point
7075; copper and copper alloys—copper, naval and ad-
of 265◦ F (403 K), permitting it to be classified as a low fire
miralty brass, aluminum bronze, cupro-nickel; and nickel
hazard material. It is noncorrosive. The vapors are toxic,
and nickel alloys—nickel, 9% nickel steel alloy,
with a TLV of 0.2 ppm; however, because of the extremely ❤ ❤ ❤
InconelX ™ , Hastelloy ™ B, Rene 41, K-Monel™ . Titanium
low vapor pressure it normally does not present a toxicity
6A14V can be used in some flight systems, but it is best
problem. Toxic effects may occur from ingestion and skin
avoided in storage or test facilities because of its low
contact.
ignition temperature in oxygen. In fact, metals will ignite
in pure oxygen at high enough pressure or high enough
4. Storage and Handling flow velocity.
Most nonmetal materials lose their elastomeric proper-
Typically 6000-gal (22.7 m3 ) tanks are used for bulk stor-
ties or flexibility at low temperatures, thus limiting the
age of Otto Fuel. The 55-gal (0.2 m3 ) shipping drums may
number of materials suitable for liquefied oxygen ser-
be used for storage of small quantities. The containers
vice. The following have been used successfully: tetraflu-
must be equipped with pressure relief devices to prevent ❤
oroethylene polymer (Teflon™ ); polychlorotrifluoroethy-
internal pressure buildup over 60 psi (414 kN/m2 ). ™❤
lene, unplasticized (Kel-F ); asbestos, oil and grease free;
and special low-temperature silicon rubber.
❤
5. Transportation Specialized lubricants such as KRYTOX™ and thread
sealants are available. The fluorolubes and perfluorocar-
Otto Fuel is shipped by 5000 gal (19 m3 ) tank trucks,
bon based products must not contain hydrocarbons, and
preferably made of stainless steel. Polyethylene 55-gal
should not be used in aluminum equipment.
(0.2 m3 ) drums overpacked with a steel drum are used
for small shipments. An ullage of 5% is required. All
containers must be provided with a means to vent excess 3. Safety Considerations
pressure.
The principal hazards associated with the use of liquefied
oxygen are
K. Oxygen
Oxygen is a strong oxidizer. Liquefied, highpurity oxygen 1. Frostbite when the liquid, or uninsulated piping
is a light-blue transparent liquid that boils vigorously at containing it, contacts the skin
normal conditions and has no odor. It is not shock sensitive, 2. Fire supported by oxygen
does not decompose, and is chemically stable. Liquefied 3. Formation of shock-sensitive mixtures, especially
oxygen is a widely used commercial product. with liquid fuels
There are no toxic effects. Oxygen does not burn, but

1. Specifications vigorously supports combustion. It is hypergolic with py-
Propellant-grade liquefied oxygen contains a minimum of rophoric materials, such as triethylaluminum, but not with
99.5 wt% O2 with the major impurity being argon. The common rocket fuels. Gaseous oxygen resulting from
prime requirement for oxygen purity is based on safety. liquid vaporization adsorbs readily in clothing, and any
Hydrocarbons in oxygen produce a very hazardous con- source of ignition may cause flare burning.
dition. Hydrocarbon impurities that have low solubilities
are especially undesirable since they are usually frozen 4. Handling and Storage
solid and can act as ignition sources. Acetylene is lim-
ited to 0.5 ppm maximum for this reason. The military Liquefied oxygen should be stored in stationary, portable,
specification is MIL-P-25508. or mobile tanks designed specifically for oxygen service.
Both storage and transportable containers should be vac-
uum jacketed; the vacuum may contain reflective insula-
tion or noncombustible powders. Either an open vent or
When selecting materials for liquefied oxygen, consider- a pressure-relieving device to permit the escape of vapor
ation should be given to low temperature properties. The is required. A warm vessel should be filled slowly until
P1: GPJ Final Pages
the system reaches an equilibrium temperature to reduce Glassman, I., and Sawyer, R. F. (1970). “The Performance of Chemi-
thermal shock. Considerable boil-off of oxygen will occur cal Propellants,” AGARDograph 129, Technivision Services, Slough,
during an initial fill and must be vented away from flames, England.
Palaszewski, B. (1997). “Propellant Technologies: A Persuasive Wave
combustibles, and heated surfaces. of Future Propulsion Benefits,” February.
Sarner, S. F. (1966). “Propellant Chemistry,” Reinhold, New York.
5. Transportation Schmidt, E. W. (1984). “Hydrazine and Its Derivatives,” Wiley, New
York.
Rail tank cars and tank trucks are used for shipping lique- Stull, D. R., Prohpet, H., et al. (1971). JANAF Thermochemical Tables,
fied oxygen. Shipments at atmospheric pressure, or under Second Edition. NSRDS-NBS-37, SD Catalog No. C13.48.37. Office
25 psig (172.4 kN/m2 ) are not regulated; however, pres- of Standard Reference Data, National Bureau of Standards, Washing-
ton, DC.
sures over 25 psig (172.4 kN/m2 ) are defined by DOT as
Sutton, George P. (1986). “Rocket Propulsion Elements,” 5th edition.
a nonflammable compressed gas. Wiley, New York.
Hazards of Chemical Rockets and Propellants (1984). Vol III, “Liq-
uid Propellants,” CPIA Publ. 394, Chemical Propulsion Information
SEE ALSO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES Agency, Laurel, Maryland.
United States Patent 5,616,882. High Energy Rocket Propellant, April 1,
COMBUSTION • FUELS • JET AND GAS TURBINE ENGINES 1977.
Weber, J. Q. (1984). Advanced Liquid Propellant Systems for Chemical
• RAMJETS AND SCRAMJETS • ROCKET MOTORS, HY-
Propulsion, Progr. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 89, 559–568.
BRID • ROCKET MOTORS, LIQUID • ROCKET MOTORS,
SOLID • SOLID PROPELLANTS • SPACECRAFT CHEMICAL Web Sites
http://members.aol.com/ensave/astro.html X-L Space Systems
PROPULSION
http://www.lerc.nasa.gov NASA Lewis Research Center
http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM NASA Marshall Space
Flight Center
BIBLIOGRAPHY http://www.grc.nasa.gov NASA Langley Research Center
http://www.afrl.af.mil/dualuse/affas.htm Air Force Research Lab, Pro-
Clark, J. D. (1972). “Ignition!” Rutgers Univ Press, New Brunswick, pulsion Directorate
New Jersey. http://www.chem.utah.edu/chemistry
Holzmann, R. T. (1969). “Chemical Rockets & Flame and Explosives http://www.personal.psu.edu
Technology,” Dekker, New York. http://www.sigma-aldrich.com

Liquid Rocket Propellants PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Liquid Rocket Propellants PDF

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Liquid Rocket Propellants PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

P1: GPJ Final Pages Qu: 00, 00, 00, 00

Liquid Rocket Propellants

I. Desirable Liquid Propellant Characteristics

GLOSSARY associated number represents the NO percentage by

742 Liquid Rocket Propellants

Liquid Rocket Propellants 743

TABLE I Physical Properties of Liquid Oxidizers

744 Liquid Rocket Propellants

TABLE II Physical Properties of Liquid Fuels

Liquid Rocket Propellants 745

FIGURE 1 Vapor pressure of liquid oxidizers.

746 Liquid Rocket Propellants

FIGURE 2 Vapor pressure of liquid fuels.

Liquid Rocket Propellants 747

FIGURE 3 Specific gravities of liquid rocket propellants.

748 Liquid Rocket Propellants

The lowest molecular weight is 2.02 for hydrogen. Here Pc At C f

Liquid Rocket Propellants 749

TABLE III Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid Oxidizers

750 Liquid Rocket Propellants

TABLE IV Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid Fuels

Liquid Rocket Propellants 751

752 Liquid Rocket Propellants

TABLE V Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Bipropellant Combinations (Cryogenic Systems)a

Oxygen Hydrogen 0.28 4.02 387 391 4935 2997

solids, of course, as are most of their hydrides. Metals do A. Cryogenic Oxidizers

TABLE VI Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Bipropellant Combinations (Storable Systems)a

Tetrafluorohydrazine Ammonia 1.27 4.49 307 325 7284 4302

Liquid Rocket Propellants 753

Oxidizer Fuel Bulk density O/F ratiob Frozenc Shiftingc ◦F K

Oxygen Hydrogen 0.31 4.50 446 456 5012 3040

TABLE VIII Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Tripropellant Combinationsa

Oxidizer Fuelb Bulk density O/F ratio Frozen Shifting ◦F K

Oxygen Hydrogen (50%) 0.23 0.88 453c 458c 4662 2845

754 Liquid Rocket Propellants

TABLE IX Theoretical Performance of Rocket Liquid Monopropellantsa

Ethylene oxide 300 0.887 166 175 1860 1288

Liquid Rocket Propellants 755

756 Liquid Rocket Propellants

Liquid Rocket Propellants 757

TABLE X Fuming Nitric Acids—Chemical Composition Limits (Weight Percent)a

a From MIL-P-7254F Amendment 2.

vides very low molecular weight combustion products, kN/m2 ).

758 Liquid Rocket Propellants

Liquid Rocket Propellants 759

760 Liquid Rocket Propellants

TABLE XII Mixed Amine Fuel Compositions (Nominal)a

MAF-1 50.5 9.0 40.5 — — — —

TABLE XIII Mixed Hydrazine Fuel Compositions (Nominal)

MHF-1 −65(219) 23.3 43.3 31.4 —

thus all mixtures will have a small amount.

Liquid Rocket Propellants 761

762 Liquid Rocket Propellants

TABLE XIV Heterogeneous Rocket Fuel Composition

Aluminum Powder 43.0 60.0 60.0

Liquid Rocket Propellants 763

764 Liquid Rocket Propellants

Liquid Rocket Propellants 765

766 Liquid Rocket Propellants