-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Rust: Type inference refactor and improve join orders #20076
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
475d872
bdcecdf
43b2977
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -796,6 +796,14 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Holds if there is multiple ways in which a type with `conditionRoot` at | ||
* the root can satisfy a constraint with `constraintRoot` at the root. | ||
*/ | ||
predicate multipleConstraintImplementations(Type conditionRoot, Type constraintRoot) { | ||
countConstraintImplementations(conditionRoot, constraintRoot) > 1 | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Holds if `baseMention` is a (transitive) base type mention of `sub`, | ||
* and `t` is mentioned (implicitly) at `path` inside `baseMention`. For | ||
|
@@ -902,14 +910,20 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
{ | ||
private import Input | ||
|
||
/** Holds if the type tree has the type `type` and should satisfy `constraint`. */ | ||
pragma[nomagic] | ||
private predicate hasTypeConstraint(HasTypeTree term, Type type, Type constraint) { | ||
type = term.getTypeAt(TypePath::nil()) and | ||
relevantConstraint(term, constraint) | ||
} | ||
|
||
private module IsInstantiationOfInput implements IsInstantiationOfInputSig<HasTypeTree> { | ||
predicate potentialInstantiationOf(HasTypeTree tt, TypeAbstraction abs, TypeMention cond) { | ||
exists(Type constraint, Type type | | ||
type = tt.getTypeAt(TypePath::nil()) and | ||
relevantConstraint(tt, constraint) and | ||
hasTypeConstraint(tt, type, constraint) and | ||
rootTypesSatisfaction(type, constraint, abs, cond, _) and | ||
// We only need to check instantiations where there are multiple candidates. | ||
countConstraintImplementations(type, constraint) > 1 | ||
multipleConstraintImplementations(type, constraint) | ||
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -918,13 +932,6 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** Holds if the type tree has the type `type` and should satisfy `constraint`. */ | ||
pragma[nomagic] | ||
private predicate hasTypeConstraint(HasTypeTree term, Type type, Type constraint) { | ||
type = term.getTypeAt(TypePath::nil()) and | ||
relevantConstraint(term, constraint) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Holds if `tt` satisfies `constraint` through `abs`, `sub`, and `constraintMention`. | ||
*/ | ||
|
@@ -944,7 +951,7 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
// When there are multiple ways the type could implement the | ||
// constraint we need to find the right implementation, which is the | ||
// one where the type instantiates the precondition. | ||
if countConstraintImplementations(type, constraint) > 1 | ||
if multipleConstraintImplementations(type, constraint) | ||
then | ||
IsInstantiationOf<HasTypeTree, IsInstantiationOfInput>::isInstantiationOf(tt, abs, sub) | ||
else any() | ||
|
@@ -989,7 +996,7 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
path = prefix0.append(suffix) | ||
) | ||
or | ||
tt.getTypeAt(TypePath::nil()) = constraint and | ||
hasTypeConstraint(tt, constraint, constraint) and | ||
t = tt.getTypeAt(path) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -1229,11 +1236,8 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
predicate relevantAccessConstraint( | ||
Access a, Declaration target, AccessPosition apos, TypePath path, Type constraint | ||
) { | ||
exists(DeclarationPosition dpos | | ||
accessDeclarationPositionMatch(apos, dpos) and | ||
target = a.getTarget() and | ||
typeParameterConstraintHasTypeParameter(target, dpos, path, _, constraint, _, _) | ||
) | ||
target = a.getTarget() and | ||
typeParameterConstraintHasTypeParameter(target, apos, path, constraint, _, _) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The predicate call has mismatched parameter count. Based on the definition at line 1393, Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes. Positive FeedbackNegative Feedback |
||
} | ||
|
||
private newtype TRelevantAccess = | ||
|
@@ -1276,12 +1280,11 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
} | ||
|
||
predicate satisfiesConstraintType( | ||
Access a, AccessPosition apos, TypePath prefix, Type constraint, TypePath path, Type t | ||
Access a, Declaration target, AccessPosition apos, TypePath prefix, Type constraint, | ||
TypePath path, Type t | ||
) { | ||
exists(RelevantAccess at | at = MkRelevantAccess(a, _, apos, prefix) | | ||
SatisfiesConstraint<RelevantAccess, SatisfiesConstraintInput>::satisfiesConstraintType(at, | ||
constraint, path, t) | ||
) | ||
SatisfiesConstraint<RelevantAccess, SatisfiesConstraintInput>::satisfiesConstraintType(MkRelevantAccess(a, | ||
target, apos, prefix), constraint, path, t) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -1370,37 +1373,38 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Holds if `tp1` and `tp2` are distinct type parameters of `target`, the | ||
* declared type at `dpos` mentions `tp1` at `path1`, `tp1` has a base | ||
* type mention of type `constraint` that mentions `tp2` at the path | ||
* `path2`. | ||
* Holds if the declared type of `target` contains a type parameter at | ||
* `apos` and `pathToConstrained` that must satisfy `constraint` and `tp` | ||
* occurs at `pathToTp` in `constraint`. | ||
* | ||
* For this example | ||
* For example, in | ||
* ```csharp | ||
* interface IFoo<A> { } | ||
* T1 M<T1, T2>(T2 item) where T2 : IFoo<T1> { } | ||
* ``` | ||
* with the method declaration being the target and the for the first | ||
* parameter position, we have the following | ||
* - `path1 = ""`, | ||
* - `tp1 = T2`, | ||
* with the method declaration being the target and with `apos` | ||
* corresponding to `item`, we have the following | ||
* - `pathToConstrained = ""`, | ||
* - `tp = T1`, | ||
* - `constraint = IFoo`, | ||
* - `path2 = "A"`, and | ||
* - `tp2 = T1`. | ||
* - `pathToTp = "A"`. | ||
*/ | ||
pragma[nomagic] | ||
private predicate typeParameterConstraintHasTypeParameter( | ||
Declaration target, DeclarationPosition dpos, TypePath path1, TypeParameter tp1, | ||
Type constraint, TypePath path2, TypeParameter tp2 | ||
Declaration target, AccessPosition apos, TypePath pathToConstrained, Type constraint, | ||
TypePath pathToTp, TypeParameter tp | ||
) { | ||
tp1 = target.getTypeParameter(_) and | ||
tp2 = target.getTypeParameter(_) and | ||
tp1 != tp2 and | ||
tp1 = target.getDeclaredType(dpos, path1) and | ||
exists(TypeMention tm | | ||
tm = getATypeParameterConstraint(tp1) and | ||
tm.resolveTypeAt(path2) = tp2 and | ||
constraint = resolveTypeMentionRoot(tm) | ||
exists(DeclarationPosition dpos, TypeParameter constrainedTp | | ||
accessDeclarationPositionMatch(apos, dpos) and | ||
constrainedTp = target.getTypeParameter(_) and | ||
tp = target.getTypeParameter(_) and | ||
constrainedTp != tp and | ||
constrainedTp = target.getDeclaredType(dpos, pathToConstrained) and | ||
exists(TypeMention tm | | ||
tm = getATypeParameterConstraint(constrainedTp) and | ||
tm.resolveTypeAt(pathToTp) = tp and | ||
constraint = resolveTypeMentionRoot(tm) | ||
) | ||
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -1409,15 +1413,9 @@ module Make1<LocationSig Location, InputSig1<Location> Input1> { | |
Access a, Declaration target, TypePath path, Type t, TypeParameter tp | ||
) { | ||
not exists(getTypeArgument(a, target, tp, _)) and | ||
target = a.getTarget() and | ||
exists( | ||
Type constraint, AccessPosition apos, DeclarationPosition dpos, TypePath pathToTp, | ||
TypePath pathToTp2 | ||
| | ||
accessDeclarationPositionMatch(apos, dpos) and | ||
typeParameterConstraintHasTypeParameter(target, dpos, pathToTp2, _, constraint, pathToTp, | ||
tp) and | ||
AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintType(a, apos, pathToTp2, constraint, | ||
exists(Type constraint, AccessPosition apos, TypePath pathToTp, TypePath pathToTp2 | | ||
typeParameterConstraintHasTypeParameter(target, apos, pathToTp2, constraint, pathToTp, tp) and | ||
AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintType(a, target, apos, pathToTp2, constraint, | ||
pathToTp.appendInverse(path), t) | ||
) | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The crux here is hat
hasTypeConstraint
includesrelevantConstraint
. Before that this disjunct allowedconstraint
to be anythingtt.getTypeAt(TypePath::nil())
which caused the relation to contain a lot of junk.