Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
|
Generally speaking, I see no reason why responses from GeoServer's built-in GWC would differ from stand-alone GWC. Having said that, our organisation uses the built-in GWC, so I do not know for sure. In GeoServer (and probably in GWC) you must setup the resolutions for a gridset properly. You must match that resolution gridset with the one you supply to Hajk (in your map's JSON config, see the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks Jacob! It seams that Hajk doesn't have support for GWC Stand alone yet. Today I spended some hours with a good colleague from Sweco and the conclusion was that some development is needed if we want to use WMS and WMTS from GWC in Hajk. I will be happy to see that development :) Have great day! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That's correct @Abelon38, my assumption was wrong. BTW, as a coincidence this issue showed up yesterday. 😉 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@Abelon38 After our analysis that some work needs to be done in Hajk admin to support a stand-alone GWC server, Nacka has initiated an effort to fix this at least for their use-case and give back to the Hajk community. See issue #1469 linked by Jacob and it's upcoming PR. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the update Martin! 😉 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi there!
I wonder if Geowebcache stand alone works with Hajk? I have tried with WMS and WMTS från my Geowebcacache (Stand alone) without success. Getting bad request whatever I do. From Geoserver and QGIS-server WMS works well but not the stand alone version of GWC. I would appreciate any idea!
Thanks
Abel
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions