IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pko315.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Yukio Koriyama

Personal Details

First Name:Yukio
Middle Name:
Last Name:Koriyama
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pko315
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/site/yukiok
CREST / Ecole Polytechnique Department of Economics 5 Avenue Henry le Chatelier Palaiseau Cedex 91120, FRANCE
+33 (0)1 70 26 69 16
Terminal Degree:2008 Department of Economics; University of Chicago (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique (CREST)

Palaiseau, France
http://crest.science/
RePEc:edi:crestfr (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Yukihiko Funaki & Yukio Koriyama, 2025. "Deriving Egalitarian and Proportional Principles from Individual Monotonicity," Working Papers 2413, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
  2. Yoichi Hizen & Kazuya Kikuchi & Yukio Koriyama & Takehito Masuda, 2024. "Jumping on the bandwagon and off the Titanic: an experimental study of turnout in two-tier voting," Papers 2408.00265, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
  3. Kazuya Kikuchi & Yukio Koriyama, 2023. "A General Impossibility Theorem on Pareto Efficiency and Bayesian Incentive Compatibility," Papers 2303.05968, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
  4. Kazuya Kikuchi & Yukio Koriyama, 2022. "The Winner-Take-All Dilemma," Papers 2206.09574, arXiv.org.
  5. Héloïse Cloléry & Yukio Koriyama, 2020. "Trapped by the Prisoner’s Dilemma, the United States Presidential Election Needs a Coordination Device," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-03019446, HAL.
  6. Héloïse Cloléry & Yukio Koriyama, 2020. "Elections présidentielles américaines : comment sortir du dilemme du prisonnier ?," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-03019443, HAL.
  7. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Yukio Koriyama & Angela Sutan & Marc Willinger, 2019. "The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games," Post-Print halshs-01929113, HAL.
  8. Yukio Koriyama & Ali Ihsan Ozkes, 2017. "Condorcet Jury Theorem and Cognitive Hierarchies: Theory and Experiments," AMSE Working Papers 1708, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
  9. Yukio Koriyama & Matias Nunez, 2014. "How proper is the dominance-solvable outcome?," Working Papers hal-01074178, HAL.
  10. Yukio KORIYAMA & Matias Nunez, 2014. "Hybrid Procedures," THEMA Working Papers 2014-02, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
  11. Yukio Koriyama & Antonin Macé & Rafael Treibich & Jean-François Laslier, 2013. "Optimal Apportionment," Post-Print halshs-01321784, HAL.
  12. Yukio Koriyama & Peter Gruner, 2012. "Public goods, participation constraints, and democracy: A possibility theorem," Post-Print hal-00689774, HAL.

    repec:lam:wpceem:18-22 is not listed on IDEAS

Articles

  1. Kazuya Kikuchi & Yukio Koriyama, 2024. "A general impossibility theorem on Pareto efficiency and Bayesian incentive compatibility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 62(4), pages 789-797, June.
  2. Kikuchi, Kazuya & Koriyama, Yukio, 2023. "The winner-take-all dilemma," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(3), July.
  3. Koriyama, Yukio & Ozkes, Ali I., 2021. "Inclusive cognitive hierarchy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 458-480.
  4. Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Koriyama, Yukio & Sutan, Angela & Willinger, Marc, 2019. "The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 587-610.
  5. Boyer, Pierre C. & Koriyama, Yukio & Schulte, Elisabeth, 2016. "Legitimacy of mechanisms for public good provision," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 120-122.
  6. Yukio Koriyama & Jean-François Laslier & Antonin Macé & Rafael Treibich, 2013. "Optimal Apportionment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(3), pages 584-608.
  7. Grüner, Hans Peter & Koriyama, Yukio, 2012. "Public goods, participation constraints, and democracy: A possibility theorem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 152-167.
  8. , & ,, 2009. "A resurrection of the Condorcet Jury Theorem," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 4(2), June.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Kazuya Kikuchi & Yukio Koriyama, 2022. "The Winner-Take-All Dilemma," Papers 2206.09574, arXiv.org.

    Cited by:

    1. Kazuya Kikuchi & Yukio Koriyama, 2023. "A General Impossibility Theorem on Pareto Efficiency and Bayesian Incentive Compatibility," Papers 2303.05968, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    2. Héloïse Cloléry & Yukio Koriyama, 2020. "Trapped by the Prisoner’s Dilemma, the United States Presidential Election Needs a Coordination Device," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-03019446, HAL.
    3. Héloïse Cloléry & Yukio Koriyama, 2020. "Elections présidentielles américaines : comment sortir du dilemme du prisonnier ?," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-03019443, HAL.

  2. Héloïse Cloléry & Yukio Koriyama, 2020. "Trapped by the Prisoner’s Dilemma, the United States Presidential Election Needs a Coordination Device," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-03019446, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Kazuya Kikuchi & Yukio Koriyama, 2019. "The Winner-Take-All Dilemma," ISER Discussion Paper 1059r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Dec 2019.
    2. Kikuchi, Kazuya & Koriyama, Yukio, 2023. "The winner-take-all dilemma," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(3), July.

  3. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Yukio Koriyama & Angela Sutan & Marc Willinger, 2019. "The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games," Post-Print halshs-01929113, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Rosemarie Nagel & Christoph Bühren & Björn Frank, 2016. "Inspired and inspiring: Hervé Moulin and the discovery of the beauty contest game," Economics Working Papers 1539, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Nov 2016.
    2. Yukio Koriyama & Ali Ihsan Ozkes, 2017. "Condorcet Jury Theorem and Cognitive Hierarchies: Theory and Experiments," Working Papers halshs-01485748, HAL.
    3. Weber, Matthias, 2022. "From Individual Human Decisions to Economic and Financial Policies," SocArXiv 5ju7z, Center for Open Science.
    4. Emna Trabelsi & Walid Hichri, 2021. "Central Bank Transparency with (semi-)public Information: Laboratory Experiments," Post-Print halshs-03042860, HAL.
    5. Muhammed Bulutay & Camille Cornand & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2020. "Learning to deal with repeated shocks under strategic complementarity: An experiment," Working Papers 2003, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    6. Cooper, Kristen B. & Schneider, Henry S. & Waldman, Michael, 2017. "Limited rationality and the strategic environment: Further theory and experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 188-208.
    7. Nobuyuki Hanaki, 2019. "Cognitive ability and observed behavior in laboratory experiments: implications for macroeconomic theory," Post-Print halshs-02534868, HAL.
    8. Kene Boun My & Camille Cornand & Rodolphe dos Santos Ferreira, 2021. "Public information and the concern for coordination," Post-Print hal-03468870, HAL.
    9. Cars Hommes & Anita Kopányi-Peuker & Joep Sonnemans, 2021. "Bubbles, crashes and information contagion in large-group asset market experiments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 414-433, June.
    10. Henning Hermes & Daniel Schunk, 2019. "If You Could Read My Mind—An Experimental Beauty-Contest Game with Children," Working Papers 1913, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    11. Bao, Te & Hommes, Cars & Pei, Jiaoying, 2021. "Expectation formation in finance and macroeconomics: A review of new experimental evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    12. Akin, Zafer, 2020. "Asymmetric Guessing Games," MPRA Paper 103871, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Michaël Assous & Muriel Dal-Pont Legrand & Harald Hagemann, 2016. "Business Cycles and Growth," GREDEG Working Papers 2016-06, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    14. Liu, Tianwei, 2016. "Heterogeneity in Guessing Games: An Experiment," MPRA Paper 75001, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  4. Yukio Koriyama & Ali Ihsan Ozkes, 2017. "Condorcet Jury Theorem and Cognitive Hierarchies: Theory and Experiments," AMSE Working Papers 1708, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.

    Cited by:

    1. Shuige Liu, 2024. "Level-$k$ Reasoning, Cognitive Hierarchy, and Rationalizability," Papers 2404.19623, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    2. Dan Levin & Luyao Zhang, 2022. "Bridging Level-K to Nash Equilibrium," Papers 2202.12292, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    3. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2024. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: the quantal hierarchy model of decision making," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 71-111, February.
    4. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2021. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: The Quantal Hierarchy model of decision-making," Papers 2106.15844, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    5. Feng, Jun & Qin, Xiangdong & Wang, Xiaoyuan, 2021. "A Bayesian cognitive hierarchy model with fixed reasoning levels," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 704-723.

  5. Yukio Koriyama & Matias Nunez, 2014. "How proper is the dominance-solvable outcome?," Working Papers hal-01074178, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Bo Chen & Rajat Deb, 2018. "The role of aggregate information in a binary threshold game," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(3), pages 381-414, October.

  6. Yukio Koriyama & Antonin Macé & Rafael Treibich & Jean-François Laslier, 2013. "Optimal Apportionment," Post-Print halshs-01321784, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Casella, Alessandra & Laslier, Jean-François & Macé, Antonin, 2017. "Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 239-259.
    2. Martin Lackner & Piotr Skowron, 2017. "Consistent Approval-Based Multi-Winner Rules," Papers 1704.02453, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    3. Antonin Macé & Rafael Treibich, 2021. "Inducing Cooperation through Weighted Voting and Veto Power," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03342906, HAL.
    4. Grimmett, Geoffrey R., 2019. "On influence and compromise in two-tier voting systems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 35-45.
    5. Marcus Pivato, 2014. "Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rules," THEMA Working Papers 2014-16, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    6. Macé, Antonin & Treibich, Rafael, 2012. "Computing the optimal weights in a utilitarian model of apportionment," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 141-151.
    7. Kurz, Sascha, 2018. "The power of the largest player," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 123-126.
    8. Jeong, Daeyoung & Kim, Semin, 2023. "Stable constitutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 794-811.
    9. Kirsch, Werner & Toth, Gabor, 2022. "Collective bias models in two-tier voting systems and the democracy deficit," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 118-137.
    10. Markus Brill & Jean-François Laslier & Piotr Skowron, 2018. "Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 30(3), pages 358-382, July.
    11. Biró, Péter & Kóczy, László Á. & Sziklai, Balázs, 2015. "Fair apportionment in the view of the Venice Commission’s recommendation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 32-41.
    12. Kurz, Sascha & Mayer, Alexander & Napel, Stefan, 2020. "Weighted committee games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 972-979.
    13. Michel Le Breton & Dominique Lepelley & Vincent Merlin, 2016. "Le Mécanisme Optimal de Vote au Sein du Conseil des Représentants d'un Système Fédéral," Working Papers hal-01452556, HAL.
    14. Allen, Trevor J. & Taagepera, Rein, 2017. "Seat allocation in federal second chambers: Logical models in Canada and Germany," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 22-30.
    15. Katarzyna Cegiełka & Piotr Dniestrzański & Janusz Łyko & Arkadiusz Maciuk & Maciej Szczeciński, 2021. "A neutral core of degressively proportional allocations under lexicographic preferences of agents," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 667-685, December.
    16. Jean-François Laslier, 2012. "Why not proportional?," Post-Print halshs-01321786, HAL.
    17. N. Maaser, 2017. "Simple vs. Sophisticated Rules for the Allocation of Voting Weights," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 67-78, April.
    18. Yaron Azrieli, 2018. "The price of ‘one person, one vote’," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(2), pages 353-385, February.
    19. Hans Gersbach, 2022. "New Forms of Democracy," CESifo Working Paper Series 10134, CESifo.
    20. Maaser, Nicola & Napel, Stefan, 2012. "A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 174-180.
    21. Kikuchi, Kazuya & Koriyama, Yukio, 2023. "The winner-take-all dilemma," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(3), July.
    22. Nicola Maaser & Thomas Stratmann, 2021. "Costly Voting in Weighted Committees: The case of moral costs," Economics Working Papers 2021-11, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    23. Matthias Weber, 2014. "Choosing Voting Systems behind the Veil of Ignorance: A Two-Tier Voting Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-042/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    24. Jenny Simon & Justin Mattias Valasek, 2017. "Centralized Fiscal Spending by Supranational Unions," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 84(333), pages 78-103, January.
    25. Kurz, Sascha & Maaser, Nicola & Napel, Stefan, 2018. "Fair representation and a linear Shapley rule," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 152-161.
    26. Pivato, Marcus & Soh, Arnold, 2020. "Weighted representative democracy," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 52-63.
    27. Sascha Kurz & Nicola Maaser & Stefan Napel & Matthias Weber, 2014. "Mostly Sunny: A Forecast of Tomorrow's Power Index Research," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-058/I, Tinbergen Institute.

  7. Yukio Koriyama & Peter Gruner, 2012. "Public goods, participation constraints, and democracy: A possibility theorem," Post-Print hal-00689774, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Engelmann, Dirk & Grüner, Hans Peter, 2014. "Tailored Bayesian Mechanisms: Experimental Evidence from Two-Stage Voting Games," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100600, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Felix Bierbrauer & Pierre C. Boyer, 2014. "Efficiency, Welfare, and Political Competition," CESifo Working Paper Series 4814, CESifo.
    3. Hoffmann, Timo & Renes, Sander, 2016. "Flip a coin or vote : an Experiment on choosing group decision," Working Papers 16-11, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.
    4. Takashi Kunimoto & Cuiling Zhang, 2021. "On incentive compatible, individually rational public good provision mechanisms," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(2), pages 431-468, August.
    5. Li, Yunan & Zhang, Xingtan, 2024. "Collective decision through an informed mediator," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    6. Boyer, Pierre C. & Koriyama, Yukio & Schulte, Elisabeth, 2016. "Legitimacy of mechanisms for public good provision," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 120-122.

Articles

  1. Kikuchi, Kazuya & Koriyama, Yukio, 2023. "The winner-take-all dilemma," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(3), July.

    Cited by:

    1. Yoichi Hizen & Kazuya Kikuchi & Yukio Koriyama & Takehito Masuda, 2024. "Jumping on the bandwagon and off the Titanic: an experimental study of turnout in two-tier voting," Papers 2408.00265, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.

  2. Koriyama, Yukio & Ozkes, Ali I., 2021. "Inclusive cognitive hierarchy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 458-480.

    Cited by:

    1. Shuige Liu, 2024. "Level-$k$ Reasoning, Cognitive Hierarchy, and Rationalizability," Papers 2404.19623, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    2. Dan Levin & Luyao Zhang, 2022. "Bridging Level-K to Nash Equilibrium," Papers 2202.12292, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    3. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2024. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: the quantal hierarchy model of decision making," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 71-111, February.
    4. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2021. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: The Quantal Hierarchy model of decision-making," Papers 2106.15844, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    5. Feng, Jun & Qin, Xiangdong & Wang, Xiaoyuan, 2021. "A Bayesian cognitive hierarchy model with fixed reasoning levels," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 704-723.

  3. Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Koriyama, Yukio & Sutan, Angela & Willinger, Marc, 2019. "The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 587-610.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Yukio Koriyama & Jean-François Laslier & Antonin Macé & Rafael Treibich, 2013. "Optimal Apportionment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(3), pages 584-608.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Grüner, Hans Peter & Koriyama, Yukio, 2012. "Public goods, participation constraints, and democracy: A possibility theorem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 152-167.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. , & ,, 2009. "A resurrection of the Condorcet Jury Theorem," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 4(2), June.

    Cited by:

    1. Triossi, Matteo, 2013. "Costly information acquisition. Is it better to toss a coin?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 169-191.
    2. Ingela Alger & Jean-François Laslier, 2022. "Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation," Post-Print hal-03682814, HAL.
    3. Christopher J Ellis & John Fender, 2010. "Information Aggregation, Growth and Franchise Extension with Applications to Female Enfranchisement and Inequality," Discussion Papers 10-27, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    4. Igerseim, Herrade & Baujard, Antoinette & Laslier, Jean-François, 2016. "La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 92(1-2), pages 151-189, Mars-Juin.
    5. Ronen Gradwohl & Yuval Heller & Arye Hillman, 2022. "Social Media and Democracy," Papers 2206.14430, arXiv.org.
    6. Wang, Chengsi & Zudenkova, Galina, 2014. "A Rationale for Non-Monotonic Group-Size Effect in Repeated Provision of Public Goods," Working Papers 14-03, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.
    7. Gradwohl, Ronen & Heller, Yuval & Hillman, Arye, 2022. "Social Media and Democracy," MPRA Paper 113609, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Wang, Chengsi & Zudenkova, Galina, 2016. "Non-monotonic group-size effect in repeated provision of public goods," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 116-128.
    9. Alexander Lundberg, 2020. "The importance of expertise in group decisions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(3), pages 495-521, October.
    10. Prato, Carlo & Wolton, Stephane, 2017. "Wisdom of the Crowd? Information Aggregation and Electoral Incentives," MPRA Paper 82753, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Hahn, Volker, 2012. "On the Optimal Size of Committees of Experts," VfS Annual Conference 2012 (Goettingen): New Approaches and Challenges for the Labor Market of the 21st Century 62041, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Shuo Liu, 2015. "Voting with public information," ECON - Working Papers 191, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jun 2017.
    13. Gersbach, Hans & Mamageishvili, Akaki & Tejada, Oriol, 2020. "Appointed Learning for the Common Good: Optimal Committee Size and Efficient Rewards," CEPR Discussion Papers 15311, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Hahn, Volker, 2017. "Committee design with endogenous participation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 388-408.
    15. Gabriele Gratton, 2013. "Pandering and Electoral Competition," Discussion Papers 2012-22B, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    16. Guha, Brishti, 2016. "Secret ballots and costly information gathering: the jury size problem revisited," MPRA Paper 73048, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Ioannides, Yannis M., 2012. "Complexity and organizational architecture," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 193-202.
    18. Ginzburg, Boris, 2017. "Sincere voting in an electorate with heterogeneous preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 120-123.
    19. Li Hao & Wing Suen, 2009. "Viewpoint: Decision-making in committees," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(2), pages 359-392, May.
    20. Keiichi Morimoto, 2021. "Information Use and the Condorcet Jury Theorem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, May.
    21. Christopher Ellis & John Fender, 2016. "Information Aggregation, Growth, And Franchise Extension With Applications To Female Enfranchisement And Inequality," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 239-267, April.
    22. Kawamura, Kohei, 2013. "Eliciting information from a large population," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 44-54.
    23. Jun Chen, 2021. "The Condorcet Jury Theorem with Information Acquisition," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-33, October.
    24. Guha, Brishti, 2022. "Ambiguity aversion, group size, and deliberation: Costly information and decision accuracy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 115-133.
    25. Marco Faravelli & Priscilla Man, 2021. "Generalized majority rules: utilitarian welfare in large but finite populations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(1), pages 21-48, July.
    26. Volker Hahn, 2017. "On the drawbacks of large committees," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 563-582, May.
    27. Demeze, Herman & Moyouwou, Issofa & Pongou, Roland, 2016. "The Welfare Economics of Tactical Voting in Democracies: A Partial Identification Equilibrium Analysis," MPRA Paper 70607, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    28. Guha, Brishti, 2017. "Should Jurors Deliberate?," MPRA Paper 79876, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    29. Carl Andreas Claussen & Egil Matsen & Øistein Røisland & Ragnar Torvik, 2009. "Overconfidence, Monetary Policy Committees and Chairman Dominance," Working Paper 2009/17, Norges Bank.
    30. Krishna, Vijay & Morgan, John, 2012. "Voluntary voting: Costs and benefits," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(6), pages 2083-2123.
    31. Gersbach, Hans & Mamageishvili, Akaki & Tejada, Oriol, 2022. "Appointed learning for the common good: Optimal committee size and monetary transfers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 153-176.
    32. Bhattacharya, Sourav & Duffy, John & Kim, SunTak, 2017. "Voting with endogenous information acquisition: Experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 316-338.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 17 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (10) 2017-04-16 2017-04-23 2018-07-16 2018-07-23 2018-11-26 2019-01-14 2019-01-21 2019-04-01 2020-03-23 2024-09-09. Author is listed
  2. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (10) 2014-07-21 2015-08-19 2018-11-26 2019-01-14 2019-01-21 2019-04-01 2020-01-06 2020-03-23 2021-02-08 2022-08-22. Author is listed
  3. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (7) 2018-07-16 2018-07-23 2020-01-06 2020-03-23 2021-02-08 2022-08-22 2024-09-09. Author is listed
  4. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (5) 2014-07-21 2015-08-19 2020-01-06 2022-08-22 2023-04-24. Author is listed
  5. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (4) 2020-01-06 2021-01-11 2021-02-08 2024-09-09
  6. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (3) 2018-07-16 2018-07-23 2020-03-23
  7. NEP-DES: Economic Design (3) 2020-01-06 2022-08-22 2023-04-24
  8. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (2) 2014-07-21 2015-08-19
  9. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (1) 2020-03-23
  10. NEP-NEU: Neuroeconomics (1) 2018-07-23
  11. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (1) 2018-07-23
  12. NEP-URE: Urban and Real Estate Economics (1) 2024-09-09

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Yukio Koriyama should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy