Abstract
Rationale
In humans, novelty/sensation seeking is seen as a personality trait with a positive relationship with addiction vulnerability. In animal studies, one of the standard procedures to model novelty seeking is the “response to novelty,” i.e., the levels of locomotor activity in a new environment. In rodents, a positive correlation was demonstrated between the response to novelty and several effects of drugs, especially the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine.
Objectives
The present study was designed to test in mice whether the response to novelty is stable across environments and whether its relationship with the stimulant effects of cocaine is altered by environmental changes. Experiment 1 assessed the responses to novelty of the same mice in two different novel environments. Experiment 2 tested the correlation between response to novelty and acute stimulant effects of cocaine recorded in two distinct environments.
Results
The results show a weak correlation only during the first 5 min of the session between the responses to novelty measured in two distinct environments. Experiment 2 demonstrates that novelty responses and stimulant effects of cocaine are positively correlated only when both behavioral responses are measured in the same environment. In contrast, the relationship between response to novelty and acute stimulant effects of cocaine is completely lost when the behavioral responses are recorded in two different environments.
Conclusions
The present results question the usual interpretation of the correlation between the response to novelty and the stimulant effects of cocaine as reflecting a relationship between two underlying individual stable characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adriani W, Laviola G (2002) Spontaneous novelty seeking and amphetamine-induced conditioning and sensitization in adult mice: evidence of dissociation as a function of age at weaning. Neuropsychopharmacology 27(2):225–236
Arias C, Mlewski EC, Miller S, Molina JC, Spear NE (2009) Novelty modulates the stimulating motor effects of ethanol in preweanling rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 92:448–456
Bardo MT, Donohew RL, Harrington NG (1996) Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav Brain Res 77:23–43
Belin D, Mar AC, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2008) High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine taking. Science 320(5881):1352–1355
Blanchard MM, Mendelsohn D, Stamp JA (2009) The HR/LR model: further evidence as an animal model of sensation seeking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33(7):1145–1154
Brabant C, Quertemont E, Tirelli E (2005) Evidence that the relations between novelty-induced activity, locomotor stimulation and place preference induced by cocaine qualitatively depend upon the dose: a multiple regression analysis in inbred C57BL/6J mice. Behav Brain Res 158:201–210
Brabant C, Alleva L, Grisar T, Quertemont E, Lakaye B, Ohtsu H, Lin JS, Jatlow P, Picciotto MR, Tirelli E (2009) Effects of the H3 receptor inverse agonist thioperamide on cocaine-induced locomotion in mice: role of the histaminergic system and potential pharmacokinetic interactions. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 202(4):673–687
Carey RJ, Damianopoulos EN (2006) Cocaine conditioning and sensitization: the habituation factor. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 84(1):128–133
Cools AR, Gingras MA (1998) Nijmegen high and low responders to novelty: a new tool in the search after the neurobiology of drug abuse liability. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 60(1):151–159
Crawley JN (2007) What’s wrong with my mouse? Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ
Davis BA, Clinton SM, Akil H, Becker JB (2008) The effects of novelty-seeking phenotypes and sex differences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in selectively bred high-responder and low-responder rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 90(3):331–338
Dickson PE, Ndukum J, Wilcox T et al (2015) Association of novelty-related behaviors and intravenous cocaine self-administration in diversity outbred mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 232:1011–1024
Didone V, Masson S, Quoilin C, Seutin V, Quertemont E (2014) Correlation between ethanol behavioral sensitization and midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity to ethanol. Addict Biol. doi:10.1111/adb.12216
Fernández-Teruel A, Driscoll P, Gil L, Aguilar R, Tobeña A, Escorihuela RM (2002) Enduring effects of environmental enrichment on novelty seeking, saccharin and ethanol intake in two rat lines (RHA/Verh and RLA/Verh) differing in incentive-seeking behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 73:225–231
Fukushiro DF, Benetti LF, Josino FS et al (2010) Environmental novelty and illumination modify ethanol-induced open-field behavioral effects in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 95:13–22
Gong W, Neill DB, Justice JB (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53(1):191–196
Grimm JW, See RE (1997) Cocaine self-administration in ovariectomized rats is predicted by response to novelty, attenuated by 17-beta estradiol, and associated with abnormal vaginal cytology. Physiol Behav 61:755–761
Hooks MS, Jones GH, Liem BJ, Justice JB (1992) Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intra-cranial amphetamine infusions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43(3):815–823
Hooks MS, Jones GH, Holzman SG, Juncos JL, Kalivas PW, Justice BJ (1994) Individual differences in behavior following amphetamine GBR-12909, or apomorphine but not SKF-38393 or quinpirole. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 116:217–225
Kabbaj M (2006) Individual differences in vulnerability to drug abuse: the high responders/low responders model. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 5(5):513–520
Kabbaj M, Devine DP, Savage VR, Akil H (2000) Neurobiological correlates of individual differences in novelty-seeking behavior in the rat: differential expression of stress-related molecules. J Neurosci 20(18):6983–6988
Kalinichev M, White DA, Holtzman SG (2004) Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. I. Expression of morphine-induced locomotor sensitization. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 177(1-2):61–67
Kalueff AV, Keisala T, Minasyan A, Kuuslahti M, Tuohimaa P (2006) Temporal stability of novelty exploration in mice exposed to different open field tests. Behav Processes 72(1):104–112
Kliethermes CL, Crabbe JC (2006) Genetic independence of mouse measures of some aspects of novelty seeking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(13):5018–5023
Kosten TA, Miserendino MJD (1998) Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-conditioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 60(4):785–791
Marinelli M (2005) The many facets of the locomotor response to a novel environment test: theoretical comment on Mitchell, Cunningham, and Mark. Behav Neurosci 119(4):1144–1151
Mitchell JM, Cunningham CL, Mark GP (2005) Locomotor activity predicts acquisition of self-administration behavior but not cocaine intake. Behav Neurosci 119:464–472
Nowak KL, Ingraham CM, McKinzie DL et al (2000) An assessment of novelty-seeking behavior in alcohol-preferring and non-preferring rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 66(1):113–121
Parkitna JR, Sikora M, Gołda S et al (2013) Novelty-seeking behaviors and the escalation of alcohol drinking after abstinence in mice are controlled by metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 on neurons expressing dopamine D1 receptors. Biol Psychiatry 73(3):263–270
Pastor R, Miquel M, Aragon CMG (2005) Habituation to test procedure modulates the involvement of dopamine D2- but not D1-receptors in ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 182(3):436–446
Pawlak C, Ho Y, Schwarting R (2008) Animal models of human psychopathology based on individual differences in novelty-seeking and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(8):1544–1568
Piazza PV, Deminière JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511–1513
Redolat R, Pérez-Martínez A, Carrasco MC, Mesa P (2009) Individual differences in novelty-seeking and behavioral responses to nicotine: a review of animal studies. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2:230–242
Sell SL, Dillon AM, Cunningham KA, Thomas ML (2005) Estrous cycle influence on individual differences in the response to novelty and cocaine in female rats. Behav Brain Res 161:69–74
Shimosato K, Watanabe S (2003) Concurrent evaluation of locomotor response to novelty and propensity toward cocaine conditioned place preference in mice. J Neurosci Methods 128:103–110
Suto N, Austin J, Vezina P (2001) Locomotor response to novelty predicts a rat’s propensity to self-administer nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158(2):175–180
Vidal-Infer A, Arenas MC, Daza-Losada M, Aguilar MA, Miñarro J, Rodríguez-Arias M (2012) High novelty-seeking predicts greater sensitivity to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 102(1):124–132
Whishaw IQ (2001) Comment les substances pharmacologiques (drogues) et les hormones influencent-elles le comportement? In: Worth Publishers (ed) Cerveau & comportement. De Boeck & Larcier, Paris
Acknowledgments
The present research was supported by grants obtained by Etienne Quertemont from the Fonds Spéciaux pour la Recherche (FSR) from the University of Liège and the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS, Convention n 2.4529.09). Laura Nyssen is a PhD candidate under contract with the FNRS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nyssen, L., Brabant, C., Didone, V. et al. Response to novelty and cocaine stimulant effects: lack of stability across environments in female Swiss mice. Psychopharmacology 233, 691–700 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-4146-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-4146-0