Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaluation of different models in rainfall-triggered landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in Chunan, southeast China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study applied the information value model (IVM), logistic regression (LR), artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) to rainfall-triggered landslide susceptibility mapping for a typical study area in southeast China. Their capabilities under 42 modelling scenarios with different combination of 9 conditioning factors were tested and compared using the performance metric of area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The results showed that all the models could acceptably produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) with the achieved AUC of 86.05, 85.89, 87.65 and 85.63% for model training, and that of 86.03, 85.7, 86.4 and 85.11% for model validation. Slightly, ANN was best, followed by LR, IVM and SVM. The LR showed a better generalization capability under the circumstances of changing combination of the conditioning factors, whereas the performance of ANN and SVM appeared to be sensitive to that. Although the comparable performance (i.e. AUC) could be achieved by all the models, the hazard zones classified from the produced LSMs exhibited considerable variation in spatial patterns. The IVM tended to overestimate the landslide susceptibility compared to others, and predicted a less area at very low-level hazard. The associated uncertainty caused by the modelling methods will lead to different management costs and risks being taken when applying the produced LSMs in geological engineering design and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at İzmir, Turkey. Landslides 9:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armaş I (2012) Weights of evidence method for landslide susceptibility mapping. Prahova Subcarpathians, Romania. Nat Hazards 60:937–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Eng Geol 81:432–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandary NP, Dahal RK, Timilsina M, Yatabe R (2013) Rainfall event-based landslide susceptibility zonation mapping. Nat Hazards 69:365–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Use of GIS technology in the prediction and monitoring of landslide hazard. Nat Hazards 20:117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadei M, Dietrich WE, Miller NL (2003) Testing a model for predicting the timing and location of shallow landslide initiation in soil-mantled landscapes. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:925–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 2(3):27

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Oh HJ, Lee HJ, Lee C, Lee S (2012) Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS. Eng Geol 124:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF (2003) A spatiotemporal probabilistic modelling of storm-induced shallow landsliding using aerial photographs and logistic regression. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:527–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir G, Aytekin M, Akgün A, İkizler SB, Tatar O (2013) A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods. Nat Hazards 65:1481–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66:327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esri AD (2011) Release 10. Documentation Manual. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng HJ, Zhou AG, Tang XM, Yu JJ (2014) Study on remote sensing interpretation for implicit geohazard in Southeast China. Geol Rev 60:1370–1380 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz JN, Guthrie RH, Brenning A (2011) Integrating physical and empirical landslide susceptibility models using generalized additive models. Geomorphology 129:376–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz JN, Brenning A, Petschko H, Leopold P (2015) Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci 81:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 78:11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco R, Sorriso-Valvo M, Catalano E (2007) Logistic regression analysis in the evaluation of mass movements susceptibility: the Aspromonte case study, Calabria, Italy. Eng Geol 89:47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F (2005) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 72:272–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang K (2012) Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth Sci Rev 112(1–2):42–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart AB, Hearn GJ (2013) Landslide assessment for land use planning and infrastructure management in the Paphos District of Cyprus. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72:173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaafari A, Najafi A, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaeian J, Sattarian A (2014) GIS-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Caspian forest, northern Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:909–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital MR, De Smedt F (2013) Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal. Comput Geosci 52:398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi J (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and the weight-of-evidence model. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 18(8):789–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian C, Zeng Z, Yao W, Tang H (2013) Displacement prediction model of landslide based on a modified ensemble empirical mode decomposition and extreme learning machine. Nat Hazards 66:759–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian C, Zeng Z, Yao W, Tang H (2014) Ensemble of extreme learning machine for landslide displacement prediction based on time series analysis. Neural Comput Appl 24:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel GP, Kobiyama M, Goerl RF (2014) Comparative analysis of SHALSTAB and SINMAP for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Cunha River basin, southern Brazil. J Soils Sediments 14:1266–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 97:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural networks model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides 7(1):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM, Varathrajoo R (2010) Approaches for delineating landslide hazard areas using different training sites in an advanced artificial neural networks model. Geospat Inf Sci 13(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T, Akgun A (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7:725–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozos D, Bathrellos GD, Skillodimou HD (2011) Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system and analytic hierarchy process methods, upon landslide susceptibility mapping, using GIS: a case study from the Eastern Achaia County of Peloponnesus, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 63:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schicker R, Moon V (2012) Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale. Geomorphology 161:40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer EA, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2011) Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia. Expert Syst Appl 38:8208–8219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma LP, Patel N, Ghose MK, Debnath P (2015) Development and application of Shannon’s entropy integrated information value model for landslide susceptibility assessment and zonation in Sikkim Himalayas in India. Nat Hazards 75:1555–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick O (2011) Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Nat Hazards 59(3):1413–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A, Hosseinali F (2010) A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 36:1101–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: an overview. Eng Geol 102:112–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Chen L, Cheng C, Yin K, Török Á (2014) GIS-based landslide hazard predicting system and its real-time test during a typhoon, Zhejiang Province, Southeast China. Eng Geol 175:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Li W, Wang Q, Liu Q, Yang Q, Xing M, Pei Y, Yan S (2016) Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China. Arab J Geosci 9(2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Dai F, Xu X, Lee YL (2012a) GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China. Geomorphology 145–146:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu X, Dai F, Saraf AK (2012b) Comparison of different models for susceptibility mapping of earthquake triggered landslides related with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Comput Geosci 46:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu X, Dai F, Wu Z, He H, Shi F, Wu X, Xu S (2013) Application of an incomplete landslide inventory, logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping related to the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake of China. Nat Hazards 68:883–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 101:572–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeşilnacar EK, Topal T (2005) Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: comparison between logistic regression and neural networks in a medium scale study, Hendek region (TURKEY). Eng Geol 79(3–4):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Chen W, Wang Q, Wu Y, Yang B (2015) A comparative study of statistical index and certainty factor models in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study for the Shangzhou District, Shaanxi Province, China. Arab J Geosci 8(11):9079–9088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhejiang Provincial Department of Land Resources (2015) Bulletin of Zhejiang geological environment: 2011–2015 (Internal report in Chinese)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research work was partly supported by the public welfare technology application research project of Zhejiang province, China (No.2016C33045). The authors also deeply appreciate Mr. Shengyi You, Mrs. Xueqin Wu and Mr. Zhong Zhang in Zhejiang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources for the filed survey work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Hangjian Feng & Chenchuan Peng

  2. Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK

    Jianjun Yu

  3. Zhejiang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Hangzhou, 310007, China

    Hangjian Feng & Xiaoming Tang

  4. School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China

    Jiali Zheng

Authors
  1. Hangjian Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianjun Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiali Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoming Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chenchuan Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianjun Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, H., Yu, J., Zheng, J. et al. Evaluation of different models in rainfall-triggered landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in Chunan, southeast China. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1399 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6211-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6211-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy