Abstract
Regional-scale atmospheric circulations play a critical role in air pollutants transport. The planetary boundary layer height, in conjunction with other components, is a key factor in atmospheric dispersion. In this study, planetary boundary layer parameters over two coastal locations (Skhira and Marsa-Dhouiba) in Tunisia were simulated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) v.4.0 dynamical core. Regarding the validation process, the model evaluation demonstrated reasonable agreement with measurements in the study sites and periods. In general, the model slightly overestimates the observed values of near-surface temperature as well as the wind speed in Skhira and slightly underestimates the observed values in Marsa-Dhouiba. For wind direction, however, WRF simulations give opposite results. This preliminary study showed that the model is able to predict the considered meteorological fields in an accurate way with both final analysis (FNL) and Era-Interim boundary datasets. Therefore, the required meteorological fields to initialize an atmospheric dispersion model can be captured reasonably well at regional scale after dynamical downscaling. Integrating our results into project studies aiming at tracing air transports could serve the purpose of reducing environmental pollution over Tunisia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balzarini A, Angelini F, Ferrero L et al (2014) Sensitivity analysis of PBL schemes by comparing WRF model and experimental data. Geosci Model Dev Discuss 7:6133–6171. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-6133-2014
Banks RF, Baldasano JM (2016) Impact of WRF model PBL schemes on air quality simulations over Catalonia, Spain. Sci Total Environ 572:98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.167
Banks RF, Tiana-Alsina J, Baldasano JM et al (2016) Sensitivity of boundary-layer variables to PBL schemes in the WRF model based on surface meteorological observations, lidar, and radiosondes during the HygrA-CD campaign. Atmos Res 176–177:185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.024
Boadh R, Satyanarayana ANV, Rama Krishna TVBPS, Madala S (2016) Sensitivity of PBL schemes of the WRF-ARW model in simulating the boundary layer flow parameters for their application to air pollution dispersion modeling over a tropical station. Atmosfera 29:61–81. https://doi.org/10.20937/ATM.2016.29.01.05
Borge R, Alexandrov V, José del Vas J et al (2008) A comprehensive sensitivity analysis of the WRF model for air quality applications over the Iberian Peninsula. Atmos Environ 42:8560–8574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.032
Bougeault P, Lacarrère P (1989) Parameterization of orography-induced turbulence in a Mesobeta-Scale model. Mon Weather Rev 117:1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117%3c1872:POOITI%3e2.0.CO;2
Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land surface—hydrology model with the Penn State—NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Weather Rev 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129%3c0569:caalsh%3e2.0.co;2
Collins WD et al (2004) Description of the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM 3.0), NCAR technical note, NCAR/TN-464+STR
Gómez-Navarro JJ, Raible CC, Dierer S (2015) Sensitivity of the WRF model to PBL parametrisations and nesting techniques: evaluation of wind storms over complex terrain. Geosci Model Dev 8:3349–3363. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3349-2015
Grell G, Dudhia J, Stauffer D (1994) A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, p 117
Hong S-Y, Dudhia J, Chen S-H (2004) A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon Weather Rev 132:103–120. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132%3c0103:ARATIM%3e2.0.CO;2
Hong S-Y, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134:2318–2341. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1
Hu XM, Nielsen-Gammon JW, Zhang F (2010) Evaluation of three planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:1831–1844. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2432.1
Janjic Z (2002) Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor–Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model. NCEP Off Note 437:61
Jiménez PA, Dudhia J, González-Rouco JF et al (2012) A revised scheme for the WRF surface layer formulation. Mon Weather Rev 140:898–918. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00056.1
Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain–Fritsch scheme. In: The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models, pp 165–170
Pleim JE (2007) A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: model description and testing. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2539.1
Skamrock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang X-Y, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF Version 3. NCAR/TN-475STR
Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric science, 3rd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam
Zhong S, In H, Clements C (2007) Impact of turbulence, land surface, and radiation parameterizations on simulated boundary layer properties in a coastal environment. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008274
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the National Centre for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) for the 4.0 version of WRF model and the FNL dataset that was employed for meteorological simulations. We are grateful also to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for providing the Era-Interim dataset.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snoun, H., Kanfoudi, H., Bellakhal, G. et al. Validation and sensitivity analysis of the WRF mesoscale model PBL schemes over Tunisia using dynamical downscaling approach. Euro-Mediterr J Environ Integr 4, 13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-019-0103-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-019-0103-3