Abstract
Plant stomata play a key role in the redistribution of energy received on vegetated land into sensible and latent heat. As a result, they have a considerable impact on the atmospheric planetary boundary layer, the hydrologic cycle, the climate, and the weather. Current parameterizations of the stomatal mechanism in state-of-the-art atmospheric models are based on empirical relations that are established at the leaf scale between stomatal conductance and environmental conditions. In order to evaluate these parameterizations, an experiment was carried out on a potato field in New Jersey during the summer of 1989. Stomatal conductances were measured within a small homogeneous area in the middle of the potato field and under a relatively broad range of atmospheric conditions. A large variability of stomatal conductances was observed. This variability, which was associated with the variability of micro-environmental and physiological conditions that is found even in a homogeneous canopy, cannot be simulated explicitly on the scale of a single agricultural field and,a fortiori, on the scale of atmospheric models. Furthermore, this variability could not be related to the environmental conditions measured at a height of 2 m above the plant canopy simultaneously with the conductances, reinforcing the concept of scale decoupling suggested by Jarvis and McNaughton (1986) and McNaughton and Jarvis (1991). Thus, for atmospheric modeling purposes, a parameterization of stomatal conductance at the canopy scale using external environmental forcing conditions seems more appropriate than a parameterization based on leaf-scale stomatal conductance, as currently adopted in state-of-the-art atmospheric models. The measured variability was characterized by a lognormal probability density function (pdf) that remained relatively stable during the entire measuring period. These observations support conclusions by McNaughton and Jarvis (1991) that, unlike current parameterizations, a parameterization of plant stomata applied on a field (or larger) scale, might not require inclusion of the complex relations found at the leaf scale between stomata and their microenvironment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avissar, R.: 1992, ‘Conceptual Aspects of a Statistical-Dynamical Approach to Represent Landscape Subgrid-Scale Heterogeneities in Atmospheric Models’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 2729–2742.
Avissar, R. and Mahrer, Y.: 1988, ‘Mapping Frost-Sensitive Areas with a Three-Dimensional Local Scale Model. Part I: Physical and Numerical Aspects’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 27, 400–413.
Avissar, R. and Pielke, R. A.: 1989, ‘A Parameterization of Heterogeneous Land Surface for Atmospheric Numerical Models and its Impact on Regional Meteorology’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 2113–2136.
Avissar, R. and Pielke, R. A.: 1991, ‘The Impact of Plant Stomatal Control on Mesoscale Atmospheric Circulations’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 54, 353–372.
Avissar, R. and Verstraete, M. M.: 1990, ‘The Representation of Continental Surface Process in Atmospheric Models’,Reviews of Geophysics 28, 35–52.
Avissar, R., Avissar, P., Mahrer, Y. and Bravdo, B. A.: 1985, ‘A Model to Simulate Response of Plant Stomata to Environmental Conditions’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 34, 21–29.
Baldocchi, D. D., Luxmoore, R. J. and Hatfield, J. L.: 1991, ‘Discerning the Forest from the Trees: An Essay on Scaling Canopy Stomatal Conductance’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 54, 197–226.
Bingham, G. E. and Coyne, P. I. 1977, ‘A Portable, Temperature-Controlled Steady State Porometer for Field Measurements of Transpiration and Photosynthesis’,Photosynthetica 11, 148–160.
Burrows, F. J. and Milthorpe F. L.: 1976, ‘Stomatal Conductance in the Control of Gas Exchange’, In T. T. Kozlowski (ed.),Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Academic Press, London,4, 103–152.
Collatz, G. J., Grivet, C., Ball, J. T. and Berry, J. A.: 1991, ‘Physiological and Environmental Regulation of Stomatal Conductance, Photosynthesis and Transpiration: A Model that Includes a Laminar Boundary Layer’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 54: 107–136.
Collins, D. and Avissar, R.: 1992, ‘An Evaluation with the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST) of which Land-Surface Parameters are of Greatest Importance for Atmospheric Modelling’,J. Climate, accepted for publication.
Cukier, R. I., Levine, H. B., and Shuler, K. E.: 1978, ‘Nonlinear Sensitivity Analysis of Multiparameter Model Systems’,J. Comp. Phys. 26, 1–42.
Deardorff, J. W.: 1978, ‘Efficient Prediction of Ground Surface Temperature and Moisture, with Inclusion of Layer of Vegetation’,J. Geophys. Res. 93, 1889–1903.
Dickinson, R. E. and Henderson-Sellers, A.: 1988, ‘Modelling Tropical Deforestation, a Study of GCM Land-Surface Parameterizations’,Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 114, 439–462.
Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., Kennedy, P. J. and Wilson, M. F.: 1986, ‘Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model’, NCAR Technical Note: NCAR/TN 275+STR, 69 pp.
Elias, P.: 1979, ‘Leaf Diffusion Resistance Pattern in an Oak-Hornbeam Forest’,Biol. Plant. 21, 1–8.
Federer, C. A.: 1979, ‘A Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Model for Transpiration and Availability of Soil Water’,Water Resour. Res. 15, 555–562.
Gradmann, H.: 1928, ‘Untersuchungen über die Wasserverhältnisse das Bodens als Grundlage des Pflanzenwachstums’,Jahrbuch für wissenschaftliche Botanik 89, 1–100.
Hall, A. E., Schulze, E. D. and Lange, O. L.: 1976, ‘Current Perspectives of Steady-State Stomatal Response to Environment’, In O. L. Lange, L. Kappen and E. D. Schulze (eds.),Water and Plant Life, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 169–188.
Hsiao, T. C.: 1973, ‘Plant Response to Water Stress’,Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24, 519–570.
Idso, S. B., Allen, S. G., and Choudhury, B. J.: 1988, ‘Problems with Porometry: Measuring Stomatal Conductances of Potentially Transpiring Plants’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 43, 49–58.
Jarvis, P. G.: 1976, ‘The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field’,Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B. 273, 593–610.
Jarvis, P. G. and Mansfield, T. A., eds.: 1981,Stomatal Physiology, Cambridge University Press, 295 pp.
Jarvis, P. G. and McNaughton, K. G.: 1986, ‘Stomatal Control of Transpiration: Scaling Up from Leaf to Region’,Adv. Ecol. Res. 15, 1–49.
Jarvis, P. G. and Morison, J I. L.: 1981, ‘The Control of Transpiration and Photosynthesis by Stomata’, in P. G. Jarvis and T. A. Mansfield (eds.),Stomatal Physiology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 248–279.
Kanemasu, E. T., Thurtell, G. W. and Tanner, C. B.: 1969, ‘Design, Calibration and Field Use of a Stomatal Diffusion Porometer’,Plant Physiol. 44, 881–885.
Katerji, N. and Perrier, A.: 1985, ‘Détèrmination de la résistance globale d'un couvert végétal à la diffusion de vapeur d'eau et de ses différentes composantes. Approche théorique et verification expérimentale sur une culture de luzerne’,Agric. Meteorol. 34, 105–120.
Katerji, N., Perrier, A. and Oulid-Aissa, A. K.: 1983, ‘Exploration au champ et interprétation de la variation horizontale et verticale de la résistance stomatique: cas d'une culture de luzerne (Medicago sativa L.)’,Agronomie 3, 847–856.
Koster, R. D. and Suarez, M. J.: 1992, ‘Modeling the Land Surface Boundary in Climate Models as a Composite of Independent Vegetation Stand’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 2697–2715.
Leverenz, J., Deans, J. D., Ford, E. D., Jarvis, P. G., Milne, R. and Whitehead, D.: 1982, ‘Systematic Spatial Variation of Stomatal Conductance in a Sikta Spruce Plantation’,J. Appl. Ecol. 19, 835–851.
Mahfouf, J. F., Richard, E. and Mascart, P.: 1987, ‘The Influence of Soil and Vegetation on the Development of Mesoscale Circulation’,J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 26, 1483–1495.
Mahrer, Y. and Pielke, R. A.: 1976, ‘Numerical Simulation of the Air Flow over Barbados’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 104, 1392–1402.
Martin, E. S., Donkin, M. E. and Stevens, R. A.: 1983, ‘Stomata’, E. Arnold (ed.), The Camelot Press, 60 pp.
Mascart, P., Taconet, O., Pinty, J. P. and Ben Mehrez, M.: 1991, ‘Canopy Resistance Formulation and its Effect in Mesoscale Models: a HAPEX Perspective’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 54, 319–351.
McCumber, M. C.: 1980,A Numerical Simulation of the Influence of Heat and Moisture Fluxes upon Mesoscale Circulations, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Virgina, Charlottesville.
McCumber, M. C. and Pielke, R. A.: 1981, ‘Simulation of the Effects of Surface Fluxes of Heat and Moisture in Mesoscale Numerical Model. Part I: Soil Layer’,J. Geophys. Res. 86, 9929–9938.
McNaughton, K. G. and Jarvis, P. G.: 1991, ‘Effects of Spatial Scale on Stomatal Control of Transpiration’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 54, 279–302.
Meyer, W. S., Reicosky, D. C. and Schaefer, N. L.: 1985, ‘Errors in Field Measurement of Leaf Diffusive Conductance Associated with Leaf Temperature’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 36, 55–64.
Monteith, J. L.: 1990, ‘Porometry and Baseline Analysis: The Case for Compatibility’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 49, 155–167.
Neumann, J. and Mahrer, Y.: 1971, ‘A Theoretical Study of the Land and Sea Breeze Circulations’,J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 532–542.
Noilhan, J. and Planton, S.: 1989, ‘A Simple Parameterization of Land Surface Processes for Meteorological Models’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 536–549.
Parkinson, K. L. and Legg, B. J.: 1972, ‘A Continuous Flow Porometer’,J. Appl. Ecol. 9, 669–675.
Pielke, R. A.: 1974, ‘A Three-Dimensional Numerical Model of the Sea Breezes over South Florida’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 102, 115–139.
Pielke, R. A. and Avissar, R.: 1990, ‘Influence of Landscape Structure on Local and Regional Climate’,Landsc. Ecol. 4, 133–155.
Pielke, R. A. and Mahrer, T.: 1975, ‘Technique to Represent the Heated-Planetary Boundary Layer in Mesoscale Models with Coarse Vertical Resolution’,J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 2288–2308.
Rochette, P., Pattery, E., Desjardins, R. L., Dwyer, L. M., Stewart, D. W. and Dube, P. A.: 1991, ‘Estimation of Maize (Zea mays L.) Canopy Conductance by Scaling up Leaf Stomatal Conductance’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 54, 241–261.
Sato, N., Sellers, P. J., Randall, D. A., Schneider, E. K., Shukla, J., Kinter III, J. L. Hou, Y.-T. and Albertazzi, E.: 1989, ‘Effects of Implementing the Simple Biosphere Model in a General Circulation Model’,J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 2757–2782.
Segal, M., Avissar, R., McCumber, M. and Pielke, R. A.: 1988, ‘Evaluation of Vegetation Effects on the Generation and Modification of Mesoscale Circulations’,J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 2268–2292.
Sellers, P. J. Mintz, Y., Sud, Y. C. and Dalcher, A.: 1986, ‘A Simple Biosphere (SiB) for Use Within General Circulation Models’,J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 505–531.
Shukla, J., Nobre, C. and Sellers, P.: 1990, ‘Amazon Deforestation and Climate Change’,Science 247, 1322–1325.
Solarova, J. and Pospisilova, J.: 1983, ‘Photosynthetic Characteristics during Ontogenesis of Leaves’,Photosynthetica 17, 101–151.
Squire, G. R. and Black, C. R.: 1981, ‘Stomatal Behaviour in the Field’, in P. G. Jarvis and T. A. Mansfield (eds.),Stomatal Physiology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 248–279.
Szeicz, G., Van Bavel, C. H. M and Takami, S.: 1973, ‘Stomatal Factor in Water Use and Dry Matter Production by Sorghum’,Agric. Meteorol. 12, 361–389.
Taconet, O., Bernard, R. and Vidal-Madjar, D.: 1986, ‘Evapotranspiration over an Agricultural Region Using Surface Flux/Temperature Model Based on NOAA-AVHRR Data’,J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 25, 284–307.
Takakura, T., Goudriaan, J. and Louwerse, W.: 1975, ‘A Behavior Model to Simulate Stomatal Resistance’,Agric. Meteorol. 15, 393–404.
van den Honert, 1948, ‘Water Transport in Plants as a Caternary Process’,Discuss. Faraday Soc. 3, 146–153.
Willmer, C. M.: 1983,Stomata, Longman, 166 pp.
Yamada, T.: 1982, ‘A Numerical Model Simulation of Turbulent Airflow in and Above Canopy’,J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 60, 439–454.
Zeiger, E., Farquhar, G. D. and Cowan, I. R., eds.: 1987,Stomatal Function, Stanford University Press, 603 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avissar, R. Observations of leaf stomatal conductance at the canopy scale: An atmospheric modeling perspective. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 64, 127–148 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705665
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705665