Abstract
Rationale
Factors that increase an individual’s susceptibility to cocaine dependence remain largely unknown. We have previously shown that adult outbred male Sprague–Dawley rats can be classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on their locomotor activity following the administration of a single dose of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Furthermore, LCR/HCR classification predicts dopamine transporter function/inhibition, cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization, and cocaine-conditioned place preference.
Objectives
The present study assessed LCR/HCR classification and the development of locomotor sensitization on the latency to acquire cocaine self-administration and motivation to self-administer cocaine.
Results
LCRs and HCRs did not differ in their latency to acquire low-dose cocaine self-administration (0.25 mg/kg/infusion over 12 s, fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement). In a follow-up experiment, repeated experimenter-administered injections of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in locomotor sensitization for LCRs, but not HCRs; nonetheless, all rats exhibited decreased latency to acquire cocaine self-administration compared to the first experiment. Repeated cocaine preexposure and LCR/HCR classification predicted break point when rats responded for cocaine under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion; multiple exposure>single exposure, LCR>HCR), but there was no interaction between these variables.
Conclusions
Although LCR/HCR classification did not predict the rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration under these conditions, LCR rats demonstrated greater responding for cocaine after acquisition (PR). Thus, these findings demonstrate the relevance of using the LCR/HCR model when studying susceptibility to cocaine dependence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed SH, Cador M (2006) Dissociation of psychomotor sensitization from compulsive cocaine consumption. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:563–571
Allen RM, Everett CV, Nelson AM, Gulley JM, Zahniser NR (2007) Low and high locomotor responsiveness to cocaine predicts intravenous cocaine conditioned place preference in male Sprague–Dawley rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:37–44
Arnold SM, Roberts DCS (1997) A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:441–448
Briegleb SK, Gulley JM, Hoover BR, Zahniser NR (2004) Individual differences in cocaine- and amphetamine-induced activation of male Sprague–Dawley rats: contribution of the dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:2168–2179
Caine SB, Lintz R, Koob GF (1993) Intravenous drug self-administration techniques in animals. In: Sahgal A (ed) Behavioral neuroscience: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 117–143
Carey RJ, DePalma G, Damianopoulos E (2003) Response to novelty as a predictor of cocaine sensitization and conditioning in rats: a correlational analysis. Psychopharmacology 168:245–252
Chen R, Tilley MR, Wei H, Zhou F, Zhou F-M, Ching S, Quan N, Stephens RL, Hill ER, Nottoli T, Han DD, Gu HH (2006) Abolished cocaine reward in mice with a cocaine-insensitive dopamine transporter. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 103:9333–9338
Erb SM, Parker LA (1994) Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:581–586
Ferrario CR, Gorny G, Crombag HS, Li Y, Kolb B, Robinson TE (2005) Neural and behavioral plasticity associated with the transition from controlled to escalated cocaine use. Biol Psychiatry 58:751–759
Gong W, Neill DB, Justice JB (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:191–196
Gulley JM (2007) Individual differences in novelty- and cocaine-induced locomotor activity as predictors of food-reinforced operant behavior in two outbred rat strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:749–757
Gulley JM, Hoover BR, Larson GA, Zahniser NR (2003) Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in rats: behavioral characteristics, cocaine pharmacokinetics, and the dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:2089–2101
Horger BA, Shelton K, Schenk S (1990) Preexposure sensitizes rats to the rewarding effects of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 37:707–711
Lack CM, Jones SR, Roberts DC (2008) Increased breakpoints on a progressive ratio schedule reinforced by IV cocaine are associated with reduced locomotor activation and reduced dopamine efflux in nucleus accumbens shell in rats. Psychopharmacology 195:517–525
Lambert NM, McLeod M, Schenk S (2006) Subjective responses to initial experience with cocaine: an exploration of the incentive-sensitization theory of drug abuse. Addiction 101:713–725
Liu Y, Roberts DCS, Morgan D (2005) Sensitization to the reinforcing effects of self-administered cocaine in rats: effects of dose and intravenous injection speed. Eur J Neurosci 22:195–200
Mantsch JR, Ho A, Schlussman SD, Kreek MJ (2001) Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self-administration by rats under extended access conditions are dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology 157:31–39
Mendrek A, Blaha CD, Phillips AG (1998) Pre-exposure of rats to amphetamine sensitizes self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology 135:416–422
Mitchell JM, Cunningham CL, Mark GP (2005) Locomotor activity predicts acquisition of self-administration behavior but not cocaine intake. Behav Neurosci 119:464–472
Morgan D, Liu Y, Roberts DCS (2006) Rapid and persistent sensitization to the reinforcing effects of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:121–128
Piazza PV, Deminiere J-M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511–1515
Pierre PJ, Vezina P (1997) Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Psychopharmacology 129:277–284
Post RM, Weiss SR, Fontana D, Pert A (1992) Conditioned sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant cocaine. Ann NY Acad Sci 654:386–399
Quertemont E, Brabant C, Tirelli E (2004) Response to novelty as a predictor of drug effects: the pitfalls of some correlational studies. Psychopharmacology 173:221–224
Richardson NR, Roberts DCS (1996) Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. J Neurosci Methods 66:1–11
Ritz MC, Lamb RJ, Goldberg SR, Kuhar MJ (1987) Cocaine receptors on dopamine transporters are related to self-administration of cocaine. Science 237:1219–1223
Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2001) Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96:103–114
Sabeti J, Gerhardt GA, Zahniser NR (2002) Acute cocaine differentially alters accumbens and striatal dopamine clearance in low and high cocaine locomotor responders: behavioral and electrochemical recordings in freely moving rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302:1201–1211
Sabeti J, Gerhardt GA, Zahniser NR (2003) Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization in low and high cocaine locomotor-responding rats are associated with differential inhibition of dopamine clearance in nucleus accumbens. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305:180–190
Schenk S, Partridge B (2000) Sensitization to cocaine’s reinforcing effects produced by various cocaine pretreatment regimens in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 66:765–770
Schuckit MA (1994) Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 151:184–189
Schuckit MA, Smith TL, Pierson J, Danko GP, Beltran I (2006) Relationships among level of response to alcohol and the number of alcoholic relatives in predicting alcohol-related outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 30:1308–1314
Suto N, Austin JD, Tanabe LM, Kramer MK, Wright DA, Vezina P (2002) Previous exposure to VTA amphetamine enhances cocaine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule in a D1 dopamine receptor dependent manner. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:970–979
Suto N, Tanabe LM, Austin JD, Creekmore E, Vezina P (2003) Previous exposure to VTA amphetamine enhances cocaine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule in an NMDA, AMPA/kainate, metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent manner. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:629–639
Vanderschuren LJMJ, Di Ciano P, Everitt BJ (2005) Involvement of the dorsal striatum in cue-controlled cocaine seeking. J Neurosci 25:8665–8670
Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J, Childress A-R, Jayne M, Yeming M, Wong C (2006) Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci 26:6583–6588
Zahniser NR, Peris J (1992) Neurochemical mechanisms of cocaine-induced sensitization. In: Lakoski JM, Galloway MP, White FJ (eds) Cocaine: pharmacology, physiology, and clinical strategies. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 229–260
Acknowledgement
This work and the authors were supported by NIH grants R37 DA004216, F31 DA023343, T32 GM007635, and K05 DA015050.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mandt, B.H., Schenk, S., Zahniser, N.R. et al. Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in male Sprague–Dawley rats and their acquisition of and motivation to self-administer cocaine. Psychopharmacology 201, 195–202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1265-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1265-x