Abstract
Rationale
Genetically determined differences in susceptibility to drug-induced sensitization could be related to risk for drug consumption.
Objectives
Studies were performed to determine whether selective breeding could be used to create lines of mice with different magnitudes of locomotor sensitization to methamphetamine (MA). MA sensitization (MASENS) lines were also examined for genetically correlated responses to MA.
Methods
Beginning with the F2 cross of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J strains, mice were tested for locomotor sensitization to repeated injections of 1 mg/kg MA and bred based on magnitude of sensitization. Five selected offspring generations were tested. All generations were also tested for MA consumption, and some were tested for dose-dependent locomotor-stimulant responses to MA, consumption of saccharin, quinine, and potassium chloride as a measure of taste sensitivity, and MA clearance after acute and repeated MA.
Results
Selective breeding resulted in creation of two lines [MA high sensitization (MAHSENS) and MA low sensitization (MALSENS)] that differed in magnitude of MA-induced sensitization. Initially, greater MA consumption in MAHSENS mice reversed over the course of selection so that MALSENS mice consumed more MA. MAHSENS mice exhibited greater sensitivity to the acute stimulant effects of MA, but there were no significant differences between the lines in MA clearance from blood.
Conclusions
Genetic factors influence magnitude of MA-induced locomotor sensitization and some of the genes involved in magnitude of this response also influence MA sensitivity and consumption. Genetic factors leading to greater MA-induced sensitization may serve a protective role against high levels of MA consumption.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins AL, Helms ML, O’Toole LA, Belknap JK (2001) Stereotypic behaviors in mice selectively bred for high and low methamphetamine-induced stereotypic chewing. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 157:96–104
Belknap JK, Richards SP, O’Toole LA, Helms ML, Phillips TJ (1997) Short-term selective breeding as a tool for QTL mapping: ethanol preference drinking in mice. Behav Genet 27:55–66
Benwell ME, Balfour DJ (1992) The effects of acute and repeated nicotine treatment on nucleus accumbens dopamine and locomotor activity. Br J Pharmacol 105:849–856
Boehm SL II, Goldfarb KJ, Serio KM, Moore EM, Linsenbardt DN (2008) Does context influence the duration of locomotor sensitization to ethanol in female DBA/2 J mice? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 197:191–201
Boileau I, Dagher A, Leyton M, Gunn RN, Baker GB, Diksic M, Benkelfat C (2006) Modeling sensitization to stimulants in humans: an [11 C]raclopride/positron emission tomography study in healthy men. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:1386–1395
Camp DM, Browman KE, Robinson TE (1994) The effects of methamphetamine and cocaine on motor behavior and extracellular dopamine in the ventral striatum of Lewis versus Fischer 344 rats. Brain Res 668:180–193
Castner SA, Williams GV (2007) From vice to virtue: insights from sensitization in the nonhuman primate. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 31:1572–1592
Crabbe JC, Phillips TJ, Kosobud A, Belknap JK (1990) Estimation of genetic correlation: interpretation of experiments using selectively bred and inbred animals. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 14:141–151
Deminiere JM, Piazza PV, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Experimental approach to individual vulnerability to psychostimulant addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13:141–147
De Vries TJ, Schoffelmeer ANM, Binnekade R, Mulder AH, Vanderschuren LJMJ (1998) Drug-induced reinstatement of heroin- and cocaine-seeking behavior following long-term extinction is associated with expression of behavioural sensitization. Eur J Neurosci 10:3565–3571
Di Ciano P (2007) Facilitated acquisition but not persistence of responding for a cocaine-paired conditioned reinforcer following sensitization with cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1426–1431
Duffy VB, Peterson JM, Bartoshuk LM (2004) Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake. Physiol Behav 82:435–445
Ellinwood EH, Balster RL (1974) Rating the behavioral effects of amphetamine. Eur J Pharmacol 28:35–41
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Harlow
Ferrario CR, Robinson TE (2007) Amphetamine pretreatment accelerates the subsequent escalation of cocaine self-administration behavior. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17:352–357
Ferrario CR, Gorny G, Crombag HS, Li Y, Kolb B, Robinson TE (2005) Neural and behavioral plasticity associated with the transition from controlled to escalated cocaine use. Biol Psychiatry 58:751–759
Fitzgerald LW, Ortiz J, Hamedani AG, Nestler EJ (1996) Drugs of abuse and stress increase the expression of GluR1 and NMDAR1 glutamate receptor subunits in the rat ventral tegmental area: common adaptations among cross-sensitizing agents. J Neurosci 16:274–282
Flagel SB, Watson SJ, Akil H, Robinson TE (2008) Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization. Behav Brain Res 186:48–56
Grisel JE, Belknap JK, O’Toole LA, Helms ML, Wenger CD, Crabbe JC (1997) Quantitative trait loci affecting methamphetamine responses in BXD recombinant inbred mouse strains. J Neurosci 17:745–754
Heilig M, Thorsell A, Sommer WH, Hansson AC, Ramchandani VA, George DT, Hommer D, Barr CS (2009) Translating the neuroscience of alcoholism into clinical treatments: from blocking the buzz to curing the blues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.018
Hinckers AS, Laucht M, Schmidt MH, Mann KF, Schumann G, Schuckit MA, Heinz A (2006) Low level of response to alcohol as associated with serotonin transporter genotype and high alcohol intake in adolescents. Biol Psychiatry 60:282–287
Hirabayashi M, Alam MR (1981) Enhancing effect of methamphetamine on ambulatory activity produced by repeated administration in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:925–932
Hitzemann R, Edmunds S, Wu W, Malmanger B, Walter N, Belknap J, Darakjian P, McWeeney S (2009) Detection of reciprocal quantitative trait loci for acute ethanol withdrawal and ethanol consumption in heterogeneous stock mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 203:713–772
Holdstock L, King AC, de Wit H (2000) Subjective and objective responses to ethanol in moderate/heavy and light social drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 24:789–794
Janowsky A, Mah C, Johnson RA, Cunningham CL, Phillips TJ, Eshleman CJC, AJ BJK (2001) Mapping genes that regulate density of dopamine transporters and correlated behaviors in recombinant inbred mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298:634–643
Kalivas PW, Duffy P (1993) Time course of extracellular dopamine and behavioral sensitization to cocaine: I. Dopamine axon terminals. J Neurosci 13:266–275
Kalivas PW, Pierce RC, Cornish J, Sorg BA (1998) A role for sensitization in craving and relapse in cocaine addiction. J Psychopharmacol 12:49–53
Kamens HM, Burkhart-Kasch S, McKinnon CS, Reed C, Phillips TJ (2005) Sensitivity to psychostimulants in mice bred for high and low stimulation to methamphetamine. Genes Brain Behav 4:110–125
Kamens HM, Burkhart-Kasch S, McKinnon CS, Li N, Reed C, Phillips TJ (2006) Ethanol-related traits in mice selectively bred for differential sensitivity to methamphetamine-induced activation. Behav Neurosci 120:1356–1366
Kazahaya Y, Akimoto K, Otsuki S (1989) Subchronic methamphetamine treatment enhances methamphetamine- or cocaine-induced dopamine efflux in vivo. Biol Psychatry 25:903–912
Kelly MA, Low MJ, Rubinstein M, Phillips TJ (2008) Role of dopamine D1-like receptors in methamphetamine locomotor responses of D2 receptor knockout mice. Genes Brain Behav 7:568–577
King AC, Houle T, de Wit H, Holdstock L, Schuster A (2002) Biphasic alcohol response differs in heavy versus light drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 26:827–835
Kuribara H (1998) Importance of initial environments in the development of ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine and cocaine in mice. J Pharm Pharmacol 50:303–309
Lane DA, Jaferi A, Kreek MJ, Pickel VM (2010) Acute and chronic cocaine differentially alter the subcellular distribution of AMPA GluR1 subunits in region-specific neurons within the mouse ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience 169:559–573
Lessov CN, Phillips TJ (1998) Duration of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 135:374–382
Lett BT (1989) Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine and cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 98:357–362
Leyton M (2007) Conditioned and sensitized responses to stimulant drugs in humans. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 31:1601–1613
Lu W, Monteggia LM, Wolf ME (2002) Repeated administration of amphetamine or cocaine does not alter AMPA receptor subunit expression in the rat midbrain. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:1–13
Marley RJ, Arros DM, Henricks KK, Marley ME, Miner LL (1998) Sensitivity to cocaine and amphetamine among mice selectively bred for differential cocaine sensitivity. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 140:42–51
Mendez IA, Williams MT, Bhavsar A, Lu AP, Bizon JL, Setlow B (2009) Long-lasting sensitization of reward-directed behavior by amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 201:74–79
Mendrek A, Blaha CD, Phillips AG (1998) Pre-exposure of rats to amphetamine sensitized self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 135:416–422
Metten P, Phillips TJ, Crabbe JC, Tarantino LM, McClearn GE, Plomin R, Erwin VG, Belknap JK (1998) High genetic susceptibility to ethanol withdrawal predicts low ethanol consumption. Mamm Genome 9:983–990
Meyer PJ, Phillips TJ (2007) Behavioral sensitization to ethanol dose not result in cross-sensitization to NMDA receptor angonists. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 195:103–115
Nelson CL, Milovanovic M, Wetter JB, Ford KA, Wolf ME (2009) Behavioral sensitization to amphetamine is not accompanied by changes in glutamate receptor surface expression in the rat nucleus accumbens. J Neurochem 109:35–51
Palmer AA, Verbitsky M, Suresh R, Kamens HM, Reed CL, Li N, Burkhart-Kasch S, McKinnon CS, Belknap JK, Gilliam TC, Phillips TJ (2005) Gene expression differences in mice divergently selected for methamphetamine sensitivity. Mamm Genome 16:291–305
Pastor R, Kamens HM, McKinnon CS, Ford MM, Phillips TJ (2010) Repeated ethanol administration modifies the temporal structure of sucrose intake patterns in mice: effects associated with behavioral sensitization. Addiction Biol 15:324–335
Paulson PE, Camp DM, Robinson TE (1991) The time course of transient behavioral depression and persistent behavioral sensitization in relation to regional brain monoamine concentrations during amphetamine withdrawal in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 103:480–492
Phillips TJ, Shen EH (1996) Neurochemical bases of locomotion and ethanol stimulant effects. Int Rev Neurobiol 39:243–282
Phillips TJ, Dickinson S, Burkhart-Kasch S (1994) Behavioral sensitization to drug stimulant effects in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice. Behav Neurosci 108:789–803
Phillips TJ, Huson M, Gwiazdon C, Burkhart-Kasch S (1995) Effects of acute and repeated ethanol exposures on locomotor activity of BXD recombinant inbred mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 19:269–278
Phillips TJ, Huson MG, McKinnon CS (1998) Localization of genes mediating acute and sensitized locomotor responses to cocaine in BXD/Ty recombinant inbred mice. J Neurosci 18:3023–3034
Phillips TJ, Broadbent J, Burkhart-Kasch S, Henderson C, Wenger CD, McMullin C, McKinnon CS, Cunningham CL (2005) Genetic correlational analysis of ethanol reward and aversion phenotypes in short-term selected mouse lines for ethanol drinking or ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion. Behav Neurosci 119:892–910
Phillips TJ, Kamens HM, Wheeler JM (2008) Behavioral genetic contributions to the study of addiction-related amphetamine effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:707–759
Pierce RC, Kalivas PW (1997) A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 25:192–216
Pierce RC, Born B, Adams M, Kalivas PW (1996) Repeated intra-ventral tegmental area administration of SKF-38393 induces behavioral and neurochemical sensitization to a subsequent cocaine challenge. Pharmacol Exp Ther 278:384–392
Post RM (2010) Mechanisms of illness progression in the recurrent affective disorders. Neurotox Res. doi:10.1007/s12640-010-9182-2
Post RM, Rose H (1976) Increasing effects of repetitive cocaine administration in the rat. Nature 260:731–732
Schuckit MA (1994) Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 151:184–189
Shuster L, Yu G, Bates A (1977) Sensitization to cocaine stimulation in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 52:185–190
Strakowski SM, Sax KW (1998) Progressive behavioral response to repeated d-amphetamine challenge: further evidence for sensitization in humans. Biol Psychiatry 44:1171–1177
Veenstra-VanderWeele J, Qaadir A, Palmer AA, Cook EH Jr, de Wit H (2006) Association between the casein kinase 1 epsilon gene region and subjective response to d-amphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:1056–1063
Vezina P (2004) Sensitization of midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity and the self-administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:827–839
Welter M, Vallone D, Samad TA, Meziane H, Usiello A, Borrelli E (2007) Absence of dopamine D2 receptors unmarsks an inhibitory control over the brain circuitries activated by cocaine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:6840–6845
Wheeler JM, Reed C, Burkhart-Kasch S, Li N, Cunningham CL, Janowsky A, Franken FH, Wiren KM, Hashimoto JG, Scibelli AC, Phillips TJ (2009) Genetically correlated effects of selectively breeding for high and low methamphetamine consumption. Genes Brain Behav 8:758–771
Zapata A, Chefer VI, Ator R, Shippenberg TS, Rocha BA (2003) Behavioral sensitization and enhanced dopamine response in the nucleus accumbens after intravenous cocaine self-administration in mice. Eur J Neurosci 17:590–596
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from NIDA (P50 DA018165 and T32 DA07262) and by the Department of Veterans Affairs. We are grateful to John Belknap for providing statistical software for performance of heritability calculations. All experiments were conducted in compliance with current laws in the United States of America.
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scibelli, A.C., McKinnon, C.S., Reed, C. et al. Selective breeding for magnitude of methamphetamine-induced sensitization alters methamphetamine consumption. Psychopharmacology 214, 791–804 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-2086-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-2086-2