Skip to main content

Advertisement

Quality of life over time in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ, early-stage invasive breast cancer, and age-matched controls

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about quality-of-life (QOL) differences over time between incident ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early-stage invasive breast cancer (EIBC) cases as compared with same-aged women without breast cancer (controls). We prospectively recruited and interviewed 1,096 women [16.8 % DCIS, 33.3 % EIBC (25.7 % Stage I; and 7.6 % Stage IIA), 49.9 % controls; mean age 58; 23.7 % non-white] at mean 6.7 weeks (T1), and 6.2 (T2), 12.3 (T3), and 24.4 months (T4) after surgery (patients) or screening mammogram (controls). We tested two hypotheses: (1) DCIS patients would report lower levels of QOL compared with controls but would report similar QOL compared with EIBC patients at baseline; and (2) DCIS patients’ QOL would improve during 2-year follow-up and approach levels similar to that of controls faster than EIBC patients. We tested hypothesis 1 using separate general linear regression models for each of the eight subscales on the RAND 36-item Health Survey, controlling for variables associated with at least one subscale at T1. Both DCIS and EIBC patients reported lower QOL at T1 than controls on all subscales (each P < 0.05). We tested hypothesis 2 using generalized estimating equations to examine change in each QOL subscale over time across the three diagnostic groups adjusting for covariates. By T3, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, energy/fatigue, and general health each differed significantly by diagnostic group at P < 0.05, because of larger differences between EIBC patients and controls; but DCIS patients no longer differed significantly from controls on any of the QOL subscales. At T4, EIBC patients still reported worse physical functioning (P = 0.0001) and general health (P = 0.0017) than controls, possibly because of lingering treatment effects. DCIS patients’ QOL was similar to that of controls two years after diagnosis, but some aspects of EIBC patients’ QOL remained lower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwartz GF, Solin LJ, Olivotto IA, Ernster VL, Pressman PI, Consensus Conference Committee (2000) The consensus conference on the treatment of in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast, April 22–25, 1999. Breast J 6(1):4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brinton LA, Sherman ME, Carreon JD, Anderson WF (2008) Recent trends in breast cancer among younger women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(22):1643–1648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amichetti M, Caffo O, Arcicasa M, Roncadin M, Lora O, Rigon A, Zini G, Armaroli L, Coghetto F, Zorat P, Neri S, Teodorani N (1999) Quality of life in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with conservative surgery and postoperative irradiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 54(2):109–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Claus EB, Petruzella S, Carter D, Kasl S (2006) Quality of life for women diagnosed with breast carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 24(30):4875–4881

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Gestel YR, Voogd AC, Vingerhoets AJ, Mols F, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Driel OJ, van Berlo CL, van de Poll-Franse LV (2007) A comparison of quality of life, disease impact and risk perception in women with invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Cancer 43(3):549–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nekhlyudov L, Kroenke CH, Jung I, Holmes MD, Colditz GA (2006) Prospective changes in quality of life after ductal carcinoma-in-situ: results from the Nurses’ Health Study. J Clin Oncol 24(18):2822–2827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, Lester SC, Kaelin CM (2004) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 350(14):1430–1441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Houghton J, George WD, Cuzick J, Duggan C, Fentiman IS, Spittle M, UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research, Ductal Carcinoma in situ Working Party, DCIS trialists in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand (2003) Radiotherapy and tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 362:95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morrow M, Strom E, Bassett L, Dershaw DD, Fowble B, Harris JR, O’Malley F, Schnitt SJ, Singletary SE, Winchester DP (2002) Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). CA Cancer J Clin 52(5):256–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silverstein MJ, Barth A, Poller DN, Gierson ED, Colburn WJ, Waisman JR, Gamagami P (1995) Ten year results comparing mastectomy to excision and radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Eur J Cancer 31A(9):1425–1427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartelink H, Horiot J, Poortmans P, Struikmans H, Van den Bogaert W, Barillot I, Fourquet A, Borger J, Jager J, Hoogenraad W, Collette L, Pierart M, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Groups (2001) Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345:1378–1387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elder E, Kennedy C, Gluch L, Carmalt H, Janu N, Joseph M, Donellan M, Molland J, Gillett D (2006) Patterns of breast cancer relapse. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:922–927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Partridge A, Adloff K, Blood E, Dees EC, Kaelin C, Golshan M, Ligibel J, de Moor JS, Weeks J, Emmons K, Winer E (2008) Risk perceptions and psychosocial outcomes of women with ductal carcinoma in situ: longitudinal results from a cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(4):243–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE (1998) Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol 16(2):501–514

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Härtl K, Engel J, Herschbach P, Reinecker H, Sommer H, Friese K (2010) Personality traits and psychosocial stress: quality of life over 2 years following breast cancer diagnosis and psychological impact factors. Psychooncology 19(2):160–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trentham-Dietz A, Sprague B, Klein R, Klein B, Cruickshanks K, Fryback D, Hampton J (2008) Health-related quality of life before and after a breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109(2):379–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Michael Y, Kawachi I, Berkman L, Holmes M, Colditz G (2000) The persistent impact of breast carcinoma on functional health status. Cancer 89(11):2176–2186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leitch AM, Dodd GD, Costanza M, Linver M, Pressman P, McGinnis L, Smith RA (1997) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: update 1997. CA Cancer J Clin 47:150–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carrera C, Payne S (1999) Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: the need for psychosocial research. Psychooncology 8:538–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, Peck A, Schechter R, Schimmel H (1983) Validation of a short Orientation–Memory–Concentration test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry 140:734–739

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM (1993) The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ 2:217–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays R, Wells K, Rogers W, Berry S, McGlynn E, Ware J (1989) Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. JAMA 262:907–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart AL, Hays R, Ware J (1988) The MOS short-form general health survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 26:724–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wells KB, Stewart AL, Hays RD, Burnam MA, Rogers W, Daniels M, Berry S, Greenfield S, Ware JE (1989) The functioning and well-being of depressed patients: results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA 262:914–919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman ML, Williams GR, Lipscomb J, Matchar D (1999) Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics 15:141–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hays RD, Morales LS (2001) The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med 33(5):350–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL (1991) The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 32(6):705–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Katz JN, Chang LC, Sangha O, Fossel AH, Bates DW (1996) Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review? Med Care 34(1):73–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Perez M, Liu Y, Schootman M, Aft R, Schechtman KB, Gillanders WE, Jeffe DB (2010) Changes in sexual problems over time in women with and without early-stage breast cancer. Menopause 17(5):924–937

    Google Scholar 

  32. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M (2002) American Joint Committee on cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Levesque P, Mondor M, Robert J, Robidoux A, Provencher L (2010) Psychological distress and physical health in the year after diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:685–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Klein D, Mercier M, Abeilard E, Puyraveau M, Danzon A, Dalstein V, Pozet A, Guizard AV, Henry-Amar M, Velten M (2011) Long-term quality of life after breast cancer: a French registry-based controlled study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129:125–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Paskett E, Alfano C, Davidson M, Andersen B, Naughton M, Sherman A, Green P, Hays J (2008) Breast cancer survivors’ health-related quality of life. Cancer 113(11):3222–3230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paskett ED, Herndon JE, Day JM, Stark NN, Winer EP, Grubbs SS, Pavy MD, Shapiro CL, List MA, Hensley ML, Naughton MA, Kornblith AB, Habin KE, Fleming GF, Bittoni MA, ftCaL GB (2008) Applying a conceptual model for examining health-related quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: CALGB study 79804. Psychooncology 17:1108–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JD, Feuer EJ, Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) collaborators (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, Edwards BK (eds) (2011) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2008. Updated Nov 10, 2011. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008/. Accessed 1 Feb 2012

  39. Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Bower JE, Belin TR (2004) Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(5):376–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taira N, Shimozuma K, Shiroiwa T, Ohsumi S, Kuroi K, Saji S, Saito M, Iha S, Watanabe T, Katsumata N (2011) Associations among baseline variables, treatment-related factors and health-related quality of life 2 years after breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128:735–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H (2008) Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134(12):1311–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2011) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed 1 Feb 2012

  43. Mokbel K (2003) Current management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Int J Clin Oncol 8:18–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwartz GF (2001) The current treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 7:308–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kwan ML, Ergas IJ, Somkin CP, Quesenberry CP, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Mandelblatt J, Pelayo MP, Timperi AW, Miles SQ, Kushi LH (2010) Quality of life among women recently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer: the Pathways Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123(2):507–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ahmed RL, Prizment A, Lazovich D, Schnitz KH, Folsom AR (2008) Lymphedema and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. J Clin Oncol 26(35):5689–5696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kroenke CH, Rosner B, Chen WY, Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Holmes MD (2004) Functional impact of breast cancer by age at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 22(10):1849–1856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nesvold IL, Reinertsen KV, Fossa SD, Dahl AA (2011) The relation between arm/shoulder problems and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Cancer Surviv 5(1):62–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mar Fan HG, Houédé-Tchen N, Yi Q, Chemerynsky LI, Downie FP, Sabate K, Tannock IF (2005) Fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive function in women after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: 1- and 2-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study. J Clin Oncol 23(31):8025–8032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Casso D, Buist DS, Taplin S (2004) Quality of life of 5–10 year breast cancer survivors diagnosed between age 40 and 49. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Janz NK, Mujahid MS, Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Alderman A, Hamilton AS, Graff J, Katz SJ (2009) Racial/ethnic differences in quality of life after diagnosis of breast cancer. J Cancer Surviv 3(4):212–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ganz PA, Land SR, Geyer CE, Cecchini RS, Costantino JP, Pajon ER, Fehrenbacher L, Atkins JN, Polikoff JA, Vogel VG, Erban JK, Linvingston RB, Perez EA, Mamounas EP, Womark N, Swain SM (2011) Menstrual history and quality-of-life outcomes in women with node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant therapy on the NSABP B-30 trial. J Clin Oncol 29(9):1110–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Boehm DU, Lebrecht A, Eckhardt T, Albrich S, Schmidt M, Sigglekow W, Kandelhardt E, Koelbl H (2009) Quality of life and adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care 18:500–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Day R (2001) Quality of life and tamoxifen in a breast cancer prevention trial: a summary of findings from the NSABP P-1 study. Ann NY Acad Sci 949:143–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Langridge C, Young OE, McHugh M, Williams L, Murray J, Macaskill EJ, McCaig F, Dixon OM, Fallowfield LJ (2011) Anastrozole and letrozole: an investigation and comparison of quality of life and tolerability. Breast Cancer Res Treat 125(3):741–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ganz PA, Coscarelli A, Fred C, Kahn B, Polinsky ML, Petersen L (1996) Breast cancer survivors: psychosocial concerns and quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat 38:183–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Dorval M, Maunsell E, Deschenes L, Brisson J, Masse B (1998) Long-term quality of life after breast cancer: comparison of 8-year survivors with population controls. J Clin Oncol 16(2):487–494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ashing-Giwa KT, Lim JW (2011) Examining emotional outcomes among a multiethnic cohort of breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 38(3):279–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Spencer SM, Lehman JM, Wynings C, Arena P, Carver CS, Antoni MH, Derhagopian RP, Ironson G, Love N (1999) Concerns about breast cancer and relations to psychosocial well-being in a multiethnic sample of early-stage patients. Health Psychol 18(2):159–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Culver JL, Arena PL, Antoni MH, Carver CS (2002) Coping and distress among women under treatment for early stage breast cancer: comparing African Americans, Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites. Psychooncology 11(6):495–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Goodwin A, Parker S, Ghersi D, Wilcken N (2009) Post-operative radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000563.pub6

    Google Scholar 

  62. James ML, Lehman M, Hider PN, Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Francis DP (2010) Fraction size in radiation treatment for breast conservation in early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003860.pub3

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hattangadi JA, Taback N, Neville BA, Harris JR, Punglia RS (2012) Accelerated partial breast irradiation using brachytherapy for breast cancer: patterns in utilization and guideline concordance. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:29–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Breast Cancer Stamp Fund (R01 CA102777; PI: Jeffe, DB), and the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA091842; PI: Eberlein, T) to the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri. The authors thank the participants, the interviewers, and the Siteman Cancer Center’s Health Behavior, Communication, and Outreach Core for data management services (Irene Fisher and Jim Struthers). The authors also thank all the physicians who helped in recruiting their patients for this study, including Drs. Barbara Monsees, Jill Dietz, Julie Margenthaler, Virginia Herrmann, Timothy Eberlein, Matthew Ellis, Imran Zoberi, Marie Taylor, Michael Naughton, Antonella Rastelli, Donald Lombardi, Cynthia Ma, Loren Michel, and Rama Suresh at Washington University School of Medicine; and Dr. Eddie Hsueh and Pam Hunborg, RN, at Saint Louis University School of Medicine.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. B. Jeffe.

Additional information

The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the NCI or Breast Cancer Stamp Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeffe, D.B., Pérez, M., Liu, Y. et al. Quality of life over time in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ, early-stage invasive breast cancer, and age-matched controls. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134, 379–391 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2048-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2048-y

Keywords

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy