Abstract
For those working in the field of landslide prevention, the estimation of hazard levels and the consequent production of thematic maps are principal objectives. They are achieved through careful analytical studies of the characteristics of landslide prone areas, thus, providing useful information regarding possible future phenomena. Such maps represent a fundamental step in the drawing up of adequate measures of landslide hazard mitigation. However, for a complete estimation of landslide hazard, meant as the degree of probability that a landslide occurs in a given area, within a given space of time, detailed and uniformly distributed data regarding their incidence and causes are required. This information, while obtainable through laborious historical research, is usually partial, incomplete and uneven, and hence, unsatisfactory for zoning on a regional scale. In order to carry this out effectively, the utilization of spatial estimation of the relative levels of landslide hazard in the various areas was considered opportune. These areas were classified according to their levels of proneness to landslide activity without taking recurrence periods into account. Various techniques were developed in order to obtain upheaval numerical estimates. The method used in this study, which was applied in the area of Potenza, is based on techniques derived from artificial intelligence (Artificial Neural Network—ANN). This method requires the definition of appropriate thematic layers, which parameterize the area under study. These are recognized by means of specific analyses in a functional relationship to the event itself. The parameters adopted are: slope gradient, slope aspect, topographical index, topographical shape, elevation, land use and lithology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44
Aleotti P, Balzelli P, De Marchi D (1996) Le reti neurali nella valutazione della suscettibilità da frana. Geologia tecnica e ambientale 4:37–47
Bishop C (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Canuti P, Casagli N (1994) Considerazioni sulla valutazione del rischio di frana. Estratto da “Fenomeni franosi e centri abitati”. Atti del Convegno di Bologna del 27 Maggio 1994. CNR—GNDCI—Regione Emilia Romagna
Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guazzetti F, Reichenbach P (1995). GIS techniques in mapping landslide hazard. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 135–175
Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides 2:329–342
Chung CHF, Fabbri AG, Van Western CJ (1995) Multivariate regression analysis for landslide hazard zonation. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 107–142
Di Nocera S, Lazzari S, Pescatore T, Russo B, Senatore MR, Tramutoli M (1988) Note illustrative della carta geologica dell’alta valle del Basento (Appennino Lucano—Italia). In Atti del Convegno: Ambiente fisico, uso e tutela del territorio di Potenza
Eastman JR (2003) IDRISI Kilimanjaro, guide to GIS and image processing, user’s guide (Ver. 14). Clark University Press, Massachusetts
Einstein HH (1988) Special lecture: landslides risk assessment procedure. Proceedings of 5th symposium on landslides, Lausanne, vol 2, pp 1075–1090
Ercanoglu M (2005) Landslide susceptibility assessment of SE Bartin (West Black Sea region, Turkey) by artificial neural networks. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:979–992
Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66:327–343
Fell R (1994) Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Can Geotechnical J 31(2):261–272
Kojima H, Chung CF, Obayashi S, Fabbri AG (1998) Comparison of strategies in prediction modelling of landslide hazard zonation. Proceedings of IAMG, pp 218–223
Lee S, Ryu JH, Min K, Won JS (2003) Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Proc Landf 28:1361–1376
Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302
Paola JD, Schowengerdt RA (1995) A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely sensed multi-spectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 16:3033–3058
Perus I, Krajinc A (1996) AiNet: a neural network application for 32bit Windows environment. User’s manual, version 1.22
Rosenfield G, Fitzpatrick-Lins K (1986). A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52:223–227
Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 318–362
Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope stability recognition, analysis, and zonation application of geographical information system to landslide hazard zonation. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Sp.-Rep. 247, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 129–177
Varnes DJ, IAEG Commission on Landslides (1984) Landslides hazard zonation—a review of principles and practise. UNESCO Paris
Zhou W (1999) Verification of the nonparametric characteristics of backpropagation neural networks for image classifications. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37(2):771–779
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the two referees for their accurate review of the manuscript and their valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caniani, D., Pascale, S., Sdao, F. et al. Neural networks and landslide susceptibility: a case study of the urban area of Potenza. Nat Hazards 45, 55–72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9169-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9169-3