Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neural networks and landslide susceptibility: a case study of the urban area of Potenza

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For those working in the field of landslide prevention, the estimation of hazard levels and the consequent production of thematic maps are principal objectives. They are achieved through careful analytical studies of the characteristics of landslide prone areas, thus, providing useful information regarding possible future phenomena. Such maps represent a fundamental step in the drawing up of adequate measures of landslide hazard mitigation. However, for a complete estimation of landslide hazard, meant as the degree of probability that a landslide occurs in a given area, within a given space of time, detailed and uniformly distributed data regarding their incidence and causes are required. This information, while obtainable through laborious historical research, is usually partial, incomplete and uneven, and hence, unsatisfactory for zoning on a regional scale. In order to carry this out effectively, the utilization of spatial estimation of the relative levels of landslide hazard in the various areas was considered opportune. These areas were classified according to their levels of proneness to landslide activity without taking recurrence periods into account. Various techniques were developed in order to obtain upheaval numerical estimates. The method used in this study, which was applied in the area of Potenza, is based on techniques derived from artificial intelligence (Artificial Neural Network—ANN). This method requires the definition of appropriate thematic layers, which parameterize the area under study. These are recognized by means of specific analyses in a functional relationship to the event itself. The parameters adopted are: slope gradient, slope aspect, topographical index, topographical shape, elevation, land use and lithology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Balzelli P, De Marchi D (1996) Le reti neurali nella valutazione della suscettibilità da frana. Geologia tecnica e ambientale 4:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop C (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Canuti P, Casagli N (1994) Considerazioni sulla valutazione del rischio di frana. Estratto da “Fenomeni franosi e centri abitati”. Atti del Convegno di Bologna del 27 Maggio 1994. CNR—GNDCI—Regione Emilia Romagna

  • Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guazzetti F, Reichenbach P (1995). GIS techniques in mapping landslide hazard. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 135–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides 2:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CHF, Fabbri AG, Van Western CJ (1995) Multivariate regression analysis for landslide hazard zonation. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 107–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Nocera S, Lazzari S, Pescatore T, Russo B, Senatore MR, Tramutoli M (1988) Note illustrative della carta geologica dell’alta valle del Basento (Appennino Lucano—Italia). In Atti del Convegno: Ambiente fisico, uso e tutela del territorio di Potenza

  • Eastman JR (2003) IDRISI Kilimanjaro, guide to GIS and image processing, user’s guide (Ver. 14). Clark University Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein HH (1988) Special lecture: landslides risk assessment procedure. Proceedings of 5th symposium on landslides, Lausanne, vol 2, pp 1075–1090

  • Ercanoglu M (2005) Landslide susceptibility assessment of SE Bartin (West Black Sea region, Turkey) by artificial neural networks. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:979–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66:327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R (1994) Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Can Geotechnical J 31(2):261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima H, Chung CF, Obayashi S, Fabbri AG (1998) Comparison of strategies in prediction modelling of landslide hazard zonation. Proceedings of IAMG, pp 218–223

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Min K, Won JS (2003) Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Proc Landf 28:1361–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paola JD, Schowengerdt RA (1995) A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely sensed multi-spectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 16:3033–3058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perus I, Krajinc A (1996) AiNet: a neural network application for 32bit Windows environment. User’s manual, version 1.22

  • Rosenfield G, Fitzpatrick-Lins K (1986). A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52:223–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 318–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope stability recognition, analysis, and zonation application of geographical information system to landslide hazard zonation. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Sp.-Rep. 247, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 129–177

  • Varnes DJ, IAEG Commission on Landslides (1984) Landslides hazard zonation—a review of principles and practise. UNESCO Paris

  • Zhou W (1999) Verification of the nonparametric characteristics of backpropagation neural networks for image classifications. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37(2):771–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the two referees for their accurate review of the manuscript and their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Sdao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caniani, D., Pascale, S., Sdao, F. et al. Neural networks and landslide susceptibility: a case study of the urban area of Potenza. Nat Hazards 45, 55–72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9169-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9169-3

Keywords

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy