Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Comparison of color, anti-nutritional factors, minerals, phenolic profile and protein digestibility between hard-to-cook and easy-to-cook grains from different kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) accessions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was aimed to evaluate the differences among anti-nutritional factors in relation to mineral absorption and protein digestibility of Easy-to-cook (ETC) and Hard-to-cook (HTC) grains from different kidney bean (KB) accessions.HTC grains showed lower a* (redness to yellowness) and b* (greenness to blueness) values and L* value than ETC grains. HTC grains had significantly higher Ca and Zn and lower Cu, Mn and Fe than ETC grains. ETC and HTC grains showed significant variation in mineral, total phenolic content (TPC), tannin and phytic acid content. TPC and tannin content were significantly higher for HTC grains, on the contrary phytic acid content was lower than counterpart ETC grains. Protein and in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) also varied significantly between HTC and ETC grains and was found to be lower for HTC grains. Majority of phenolic compounds (PCs) were present in bound state in both ETC and HTC grains. Moreover, HTC grains showed higher amount of chlorogenic acid and catechin content than ETC grains in bound form. ETC and HTC grains from dark color accessions showed higher catechin content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AACC International. Approved methods of analysis, 11th (ed.) Method46-13.01.Crude protein-Micro-Kjeldahl method. Approved October 8, 1976; reapproved November 3, 1999. AACC International: St. Paul,MN. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/AACCIntMethod-46-13.01

  • Akeson WR, Stahmanna AA (1964) Pepsin pancreatin digest index of protein. J Nutri 83:257–261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akond ASMGM, Crawford H, Berthold J, Talukder ZI, Hossain K (2011) Minerals (Zn, Fe, Ca and Mg) and antinutrient (phytic acid) constituents in common beans. Am J Food Technol 6:235–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe S, Gonzalez AV, Rengifo J (2000) Research on trace minerals in the common bean. Food Nutri Bull 21:387–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beninger CW, Hosfield GL (2003) Antioxidant activity of extracts, condensed tannin fractions, and pure flavonoids from Phaseolus vulgaris L. seed coat color genotypes. J Agri Food Chem 51:7879–7883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bressani R, Elias LG (1980). Polyphenols in cereals and legumes. Hulse JH (ed.) IDRC-145e, Ottawa

  • Champ MMJ (2002) Non-nutrient bioactive substances of pulses. Br J Nutr 88:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinelli G, Bonetti A, Minelli M, Marotti I, Catizone P, Mazzanti A (2006) Content of flavonols in Italian bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) ecotypes. Food Chem 99:105–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donangelo CM, Woodhouse LR, King SM, Toffolo G, Shames DM, Viteri FE, Cheng Z, Welch RM, King JC (2003) Iron and zinc absorption from two bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in young women. J Agri Food Chem 51:5137–5143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feil B (2001) Phytic acid. J New Seeds 3:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia E, Filisetti T, Udaeta J, Lajolo F (1998) Hard-to-cook beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris): involvement of phenolic compounds and pectates. J Agric Food Chem 46:2110–2116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gracia E, Lajolo FM, Swanson BG (1993) A comparative study of normal and hard-to-cook brazilian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L): ultrastructural and histochemical aspects. J Food Struct 12:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RK, Haslam E (1980) Vegetable tannins-structure and biosynthesis. In: Polyphenols in cereals and legumes symposium, St. Louis, Missouri, IDRC

  • Haug W, Lantzsch HJ (1983) Sensitive method for the rapid determination of phytic acid in cereals and cereals products. J Sci and Food Agric 34:1423–1426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hincks MJ, Stanley DW (1987) Hard-to-cook defect in black beans: protein and starch consideration. J Agric Food Chem 35:517–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GM, Varriano-Marston E (1981) Hard-to-cook phenomenon in beans: effects of accelerated storage on water absorption and cooking time. J Food Sci 46:799–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PMB, Boulter D (1983) The cause of reduced cooking rate in Phaseolus vulgaris following adverse storage conditions. J Food Sci 48:623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanbabaee K, Ree T (2001) Tannins: classification and definition. Nat Prod Rep 18:641–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal S, Udipi SA, Ghugre P (2010) Polyphenols and tannins in Indian pulses: effect of soaking, germination and pressure cooking. Food Res Int 43:526–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Bourne MC (1995) Cellular, biological, and physicochemical basis for the hard-to-cook defect in legume seeds. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutri 35:263–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Amoros ML, Hernandez T, Estrella I (2006) Effect of germination on legume phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity. J Food Comp Anal 19:277–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luthria DL, Pastor-Corrales MA (2006) Phenolic acids content of fifteen dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. J Food Comp Anal 19:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machado CM, Ferruzzi MG, Nielsen SS (2008) Impact of the hard-to-cook phenomenon on phenolic antioxidants in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Agric Food Chem 56:3102–3110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madhujith T, Naczk M, Shahidi F (2004) Antioxidant activity of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Food Lipids 11:220–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mather J (2002) Pulses and carcinogenesis: potential for the prevention of colon, breast and other cancers. Br J Nutr 88:S273–S279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson S (1948) The cookability of yellow peas. Soil Sci 66:77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbofung CMF, Rigby N, Waldron K (1991) Use of two varieties of hard-to-cook beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) in the processing of koki (a steamed legume product). Plant Foods Hum Nut 54:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozzolillo C, De Bezada M (1984) Browning of lentil seeds, concomitant loss of viability, and the possible role of soluble tannins in both phenomena. Can J Plant Sci 64:815–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyombaire G, Siddiq M, Dolan K (2007) Effect of soaking and cooking on the oligosaccharides and lectins of red kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Bean Improv Coop Ann Rep 50:31–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ologhobo AD (1980) Biochemical and nutritional studies of cowpea and limebean with particular reference to some inherent antinutritional components. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

  • Oomah BD, Blanchard C, Balasubramanian P (2008) Phytic acid, phytase, minerals and antioxidant activity in canadian dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 56:11312–11319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar N, Virdi AS, Singh N, Kaur A, Bajaj R, Rana JC, Agrawal L, Nautiyal CS (2014) Evaluation of physicochemical, textural, mineral and protein characteristics of kidney bean grown at Himalayan region. Food Res Int 66:45–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar N, Singh N, Kaur A, Virdi AS, Shevkani K (2017) Protein and microstructure evaluation of Harder-to-cook and Easy-to-cook grains from different Kidney bean accessions. LWT- Food Sci Tech (In Press)

  • Phillips RD, McWatters KH, Chinnan MS, Hung YC, Beuchat LR, Sefa-Dedeh S, Sakyi-Dawson S, Ngoddy P, Nnanyelugo D, Enwere J, Komey SM, Liu K, Mensa-Wilmot Y, Nnanna IA, Okeke C, Prinyawiwatkul W, Saalia FK (2003) Utilization of cowpeas for human food. Field Crops Res 82:193–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy NR, Pierson MD, Sathe SK, Salunkhe DK (1985) Dry bean tannins: a review of nutritional implications. J Am Oil Chem Soc 62:541–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Moreno C, Paredes-Lopez O, Gonzalez E (1993) Hard-to-cook phenomenon in common beans—a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 33:227–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Moreno C, Okamura-Esparza J, Armienta-Rodelo E, Gomez-Garza RM, Milan-Carrillo J (2000) Hard-to-cook phenomenon in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L): effect of accelerated storage on quality. Plant Food Hum Nut 55:229–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Moreno C, Rouzaud-Sandez O, Milan-Carrillo J, Garzon-Tiznado JA, Camacho-Hernandez L (2001) Hard-to-cook tendency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties. J Sci Food Agric 81:1008–1012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Ruiz J, Davila-Ortiz G, Chel-Guerrero L, Betancur-Ancona D (2012) Wet fractionation of hard-to-cook bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seeds and characterization of protein, starch and fibre fractions. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:1531–1540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schanderl SH (1970) Methods in food analysis. Academic Press, New York, p 709

    Google Scholar 

  • Segura-Campos MR, Garcia-Rodriguez K, Ruiz-Ruiz JC, Chel-Guerrero L, Betancur-Ancona D (2014) In vitro bioactivity, nutritional and sensory properties of semolina pasta added with hard-to-cook bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) protein hydrolysate. J Func Foods 8:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shibuya N (1984) Phenolic acids and their carbohydrate esters in rice endosperm cell walls. Phytochemistry 23:2233–2237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sievwright CA, Shipe WF (1986). Effect of storage conditions and chemical treatments on firmness, in vitro protein digestibility, condensed tannins, phytic acid and divalent cations of cooked black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Food Sci 51(4):982–987

  • Singh B, Singh JP, Shevkani K, Singh N, Kaur A (2016a) Bioactive constituents in pulses and their health benefits. J Food Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13197-016-2391-9

  • Singh B, Singh N, Thakur S, Kaur A (2016b) Ultrasound assisted extraction of polyphenols and their distribution in whole mung bean, hull and cotyledon. J Food Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13197-016-2356-z

  • Srisuma N, Hammerschmidt R, Uebersax MA, Ruengsakulrach S, Bennink MR, Hosfield GL (1989) Storage induced changes of phenolic acids and the development of hard-to-cook in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris var. Seafarer). J Food Sci 54:311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari BK, Singh N (2012) Pulse chemistry and technology. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Y, Phillips RD (1991) Effect of the hard-to-cook defect and processing on protein and starch digestibility of cowpeas. Cereal Chem 68:413–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Daun JK (2004) Effect of variety and crude protein content on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). J Sci Food Agric 84:1021–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wassimi NN, Hosfield GL, Uebersax MA (1988) Combining ability of tannin content and protein characteristics of raw and cooked dry beans. Crop Sci 28:452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Chang SKC (2008) Effect of soaking, boiling, and steaming on total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of cool season food legumes. Food Chem 110:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Halley S, Perret J, Harris M, Wilson J, Qian M (2002) Free radical scavenging properties of wheat extracts. Food Chem 50:1619–1624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial assistance from department of biotechnology (DBT) is acknowledged. The authors acknowledge Dr. Jai Chand Rana for providing the samples for research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India

    Naincy Parmar, Narpinder Singh, Amritpal Kaur & Sheetal Thakur

Authors
  1. Naincy Parmar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Narpinder Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amritpal Kaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sheetal Thakur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narpinder Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parmar, N., Singh, N., Kaur, A. et al. Comparison of color, anti-nutritional factors, minerals, phenolic profile and protein digestibility between hard-to-cook and easy-to-cook grains from different kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) accessions. J Food Sci Technol 54, 1023–1034 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2538-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2538-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy