[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IDV #GZO-896323]: Fwd: [GODAE #10505]: Problem with FNMOC WW3 data



> Hi Yuan,
> I've encountered another problem - unrelated to plotting wave directions.
> Like the wave direction data, it also concerns some files from
> USGOSAE.org for data from the FNMOC WAVEWATCH III model.
> Files that I down loaded for the HEIGHT of wind waves (meters) were
> coming up as mean wave PERIOD of wind waves (seconds). I checked with
> the folks at USGODAE (see the email thread below) and they confirmed
> that the data is good. It appears that there's a problem when IDV goes
> to some table to retrieve the data type.
> From : http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/WDM/Guides/Guide-binary-2.html
> 102   Significant height of wind waves        m
> 
> 103   Mean period of wind waves       s
> 
> 
> It appears IDV mistakenly thinks that 102 = Mean period of wind waves.
> 
Alan,

Let me know if you get the table and need help.


Yuan
> Can you confirm this?
> My goal here is to plot those wind wave directions on top of the wind
> wave height, but I'd like to do that with height in feet. It's hard to
> convert seconds to feet :), much easier to convert meters!
> 
> thanks,
> alan
> 
> Here's a data file:
> 
> http://www.usgodae.org/ftp/outgoing/fnmoc/models/ww3/2009/2009110800/US058GOCN-GR1mdl.0110_0240_00000F0RL2009110800_0001_000000-000000wnd_wav_ht
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:      [GODAE #10505]: Problem with FNMOC WW3 data
> Date:         Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:09:39 -0700
> From:         GODAE Help <address@hidden>
> Reply-To:     GODAE Help <address@hidden>
> To:   <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>,
> <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>,
> <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>,
> <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> 
> I stand corrected.  IDV does read in GRIB files.  I had to rename it first to 
> give a .grib extension.  Afterwards, it read it in, and plot it.  Yes, it 
> claims for it to be mean_period_of_wind_waves@surface, which is not correct.
> 
> I think you should ping on the IDV group.
> 
> THanks,
> Mike
> 
> >  Hi Alan:
> >
> >  The data in question appears to be correct as hosted on USGODAE.  The 
> > parameter ID in the GRIB file is 102 which maps to 'significant height of 
> > wind waves' according to the WMO GRIB specifications.  I looked at the 
> > exact file that you referenced below.
> >
> >  IDV does not read in GRIB data directly.  You must be doing some type of 
> > conversion of the file, perhaps into another format like NetCDF for IDV to 
> > use it.  I am using version 2.9 of the IDV, perhaps there is a newer one 
> > that can use GRIB directly.
> >
> >  I am going to close off the ticket, since I believe that the data is ok.  
> > But, feel free to respond back, re-openening it if you feel otherwise.
> >
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  Mike Frost
> >
> >  >  Hello again, Efren,
> >  >  I've attached a copy of a plot I made this morning, with a color scale
> >  >  similar to your's.
> >  >  I think that they're basically the same plot.
> >  >    From the legend, you can see that IDV thinks I'm plotting mean period
> >  >  for wind waves. It must be getting that info from some file header.
> >  >  The Max value on the plot is 4.9 seconds, an appropriate value for wind
> >  >  waves.
> >  >  I tried some other files from this and other days (including  from 2010)
> >  >  and they all display as wave period, not height. The max values were
> >  >  always in the range of 4-5 seconds.
> >  >
> >  >  Just to be sure we're looking at the same file, here's the url for the
> >  >  data file:
> >  >  
> > http://www.usgodae.org/ftp/outgoing/fnmoc/models/ww3/2009/2009110800/US058GOCN-GR1mdl.0110_0240_00000F0RL2009110800_0001_000000-000000wnd_wav_ht
> >  >
> >  >  A couple more observations:
> >  >  The file size for the wind wave height is double that for the wind wave
> >  >  period. Is that significant?
> >  >  Contours for wnd_wv_per and wnd_wv_ht are nearly identical - not
> >  >  unexpected, but a little curious.
> >  >
> >  >  alan
> >  >
> >  >  On 4/14/2011 5:20 PM, Serra, Mr. Efren, Contractor, Code 7542 wrote:
> >  >  >  Alan,
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  [serra@nrlgodae1 2009110800]$ wgrib -V 
> > US058GOCN-GR1mdl.0110_0240_00000F0RL2009110800_0001_000000-000000wnd_wav_ht
> >  >  >  rec 1:0:date 2009110800 WVHGT kpds5=102 kpds6=1 kpds7=0 levels=(0,0) 
> > grid=240 sfc anl: bitmap: 30390 undef
> >  >  >     WVHGT=Sig height of wind waves [m]
> >  >  >     timerange 0 P1 0 P2 0 TimeU 1  nx 360 ny 181 GDS grid 0 
> > num_in_ave 0 missing 0
> >  >  >     center 58 subcenter 0 process 110 Table 3
> >  >  >   latlon: lat  -90.000000 to 90.000000 by 1.000000  nxny 65160
> >  >  >             long 0.000000 to -1.000000 by 1.000000, (360 x 181) scan 
> > 64 mode 128 bdsgrid 1
> >  >  >     min/max data 0 4.92  num bits 16  BDS_Ref 0  DecScale 4 BinScale 0
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  [serra@nrlgodae1 2009110800]$
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  Above is output from wgrib.  I was wondering how you determined that 
> > it was wind wave PERIOD.  Also, I used grib2ctl.pl, gribmap, and gradsc and 
> > displayed the field.  Image attached.
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  Efren A. Serra (Contractor)
> >  >  >  DeVine Consulting, Inc.
> >  >  >  Naval Research Laboratory
> >  >  >  Marine Meteorology Division
> >  >  >  7 Grace Hopper Ave., STOP 2
> >  >  >  Monterey, CA 93943
> >  >  >  Code 7542
> >  >  >  Office: 831-656-4650
> >  >  >  -----Original Message-----
> >  >  >  From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden]
> >  >  >  Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 2:50 PM
> >  >  >  To: Frost, Mr. Michael; Cook, Mr. John; Ignaszewski, Mr. Mark, Code 
> > 7542; Cummings, Dr. James; Serra, Mr. Efren, Contractor, Code 7542; 
> > Karengin, Mr. Dean, Contractor, Code 7501.1
> >  >  >Subject: [GODAE #10505]: Problem with FNMOC WW3 data
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  Sender:  address@hidden
> >  >  >  Date:  Thu Apr 14 21:49:55 UTC 2011
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  Message
> >  >  >  Hello,
> >  >  >  I recently down loaded some files that were supposed to be wind wave 
> > HEIGHT data. Instead, they had wind wave PERIOD date. I think the entire 
> > model run is corrupted like this.
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  Is it possible to get the correct data?
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  Here's the first file of the series(cl)
> >  >  >  
> > US058GOCN-GR1mdl.0110_0240_00000F0RL2009110800_0001_000000-000000wnd_wav_ht
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  thanks,
> >  >  >  Alan Bol
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  DEBUG INFO
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  remote addr  128.117.107.155
> >  >  >  remote host  128.117.107.155
> >  >  >  remote ident
> >  >  >  remote user
> >  >  >  request method  POST
> >  >  >  referer  http://www.usgodae.org/contacts.html
> >  >  >  user agent  Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; 
> > rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16
> >  >  >
> >  >
> >  >  --
> >  >  Alan Bol
> >  >  Project Lead | Scientist | Instructional Designer
> >  >  The COMET Program | www.comet.ucar.edu
> >  >  303.497.8334 voice | 8491 fax
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: GZO-896323
Department: Support IDV
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed


pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy