Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
7 pages
1 file
How does biomedicine organise and maintain communities? How do such communities relate to each other and other forms of collective life? And how does an inquiry into biosocialities help us better understand global phenomena in the 21 st century? This MA course addresses these questions through the example of the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on Michel Foucault's work on biopolitics, the first few sessions aim to establish a conceptual toolkit that in subsequent sessions will be used to analyse specific aspects of the current pandemic. Possible topics include the role of scientific expertise, discourses centred around national statistics, the politics of prioritisation within a given population, the competition between pharmaceutical companies to develop a vaccine, anti-lockdown protests, long Covid, and the transformation of public life (especially in urban settings).
2021
How does biomedicine organise and maintain communities? How do such communities relate to each other and other forms of collective life? And how does an inquiry into biosocialities help us better understand global phenomena in the 21st century? This MA course addresses these questions through the example of the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on Michel Foucault’s work on biopolitics, the first few sessions aim to establish a conceptual toolkit that in subsequent sessions will be used to analyse specific aspects of the current pandemic. Possible topics include the role of scientific expertise, discourses centred around national statistics, the politics of prioritisation within a given population, the competition between pharmaceutical companies to develop a vaccine, anti-lockdown protests, and the transformation of public life (especially in urban settings).
Critical Inquiry, 2021
In a recent blog post, Joshua Clover rightly notices the swift emergence of a new panoply of “genres of the quarantine.”1 It should not come as a surprise that one of them centers on Michel Foucault’s notion of biopolitics, asking whether or not it is still appropriate to describe the situation that we are currently experiencing. Neither should it come as a surprise that, in virtually all of the contributions that make use of the concept of biopolitics to address the current coronavirus pandemic, the same bunch of rather vague ideas are mentioned over and over again, while other—no doubt more interesting—Foucauldian insights tend to be ignored. In what follows, I discuss two of these insights, and I conclude with some methodological remarks on the issue of what it may mean to “respond” to the current “crisis.”
Crisis and Critique (Vol. 7, Issue 3), 2020
The ongoing pandemic seems to have has dramatically affirmed the relevance of the notion of biopolitics and the subject of life more broadly. The notion was, however, developed by Michel Foucault in a very different social and political context from that of ours. After investigating the background and implications of his analysis, this article focuses on Giorgio Agamben and Roberto Esposito's reappropriation of biopolitics and the metaphysical turn that they brought about. Besides these approaches, the notions of bio-economy and bio-capitalism open up new pathways that are more attentive to today's economic and social realities. Within the light of these questions and Agamben's and Esposito's theoretical elaborations, Marxist approaches to metabolism and social reproduction apprehend the question of life in an decisive way, directly connected to the will to construct an alternative to the form of Disaster Capitalism that currently menaces nature and humanity.
Digithum
Over the last decade, the social agenda has been shaped by a continuous chain of potentially forthcoming future emergencies. Imagined, projected, and expected emergencies and crises have affected political and scientific agendas and redefined the pre-planning for risks at a local, national, and global level. Whilst most of these emergencies took place largely on an imaginary stage and never materialised – at least not with significant effects on global society – the COVID-19 pandemic finally made real the imaginary that had been expected and projected for over a decade. This article claims that within the context of an emergency in the making and the consequent social, economic, political, and material crises, sociology and social analysis need to assume new responsibilities by providing answers and perspective to those social developments that are direct and indirect results of the social and material conditions of a society of emergency. In a world in which the reality of emergenc...
Rethinking Marxism, 2020
The past months during the COVID-19 pandemic, many authors have pointed out the relevance of Michel Foucault’s theories of biopolitics for the present situation. Foucault’s theories of biopolitics were further developed by Italian neo-Marxist thinkers to analyze post-Fordist labour conditions. The current pandemic has emphasized the observation made by Foucault that biopolitics is always a differential exposure to risk, as we have seen that some are allowed to stay in lockdown while others have to keep on working. The pandemic has also revealed how post-Fordist labour has always been dependent on deskilled and often outsourced forms of labour, as exemplified by the current rise in platform companies. The exploitative labour practices of the latter, however, will make resistance more difficult than the Italian neo-Marxists imagine.
MultiMedia Publishing, 2020
Biopower refers to the practice of modern nation-states through an explosion of numerous and diverse techniques for achieving the subjugation of bodies and the control of populations. Foucault used the term to refer specifically to public health practices, among other regulatory mechanisms. Biopolitics is a concept that takes into account the management of the life and populations of a governed region. Biopolitics produces a generalized disciplinary society and regulatory controls through population biopolitics. Giorgio Agamben states that what is manifesting in this pandemic is the growing tendency to use the state of emergency as a normal paradigm of government. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29380.04488
Theory&Event, 2023
In this essay we take stock of the shortcomings, successes, and promises of 'biopolitics' to understand and frame global health crises such as COVID-19. We claim that rather than thinking in terms of a special relationship between Western modernity and biopolitics, it is better to look at a longer and more global history of populations' politics of life and health to situate present and future responses to ecological crises. Normatively, we argue for an affirmative biopolitics, that at once de-securitizes current approaches to our biosocial condition and expands the politics of the human estate to other molar and molecular dimensions.
Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 2020
Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 2021
As the 21st century became shaped by the matters of public health, the Covid-19 pandemic revealed that it is a trap to believe that we have to choose between the medicalisation of politics and the politicisation of medicine. My thesis is that models of good governance in the post-pandemic world must be shaped by leftist principles, values and practices, in order to ensure not the reopening, but the reconstruction of public life, which needs more than ever overcoming social inequalities and political polarisations, whereas liberal principles should be implemented in order to fix standards of economic performance and efficiency after applying mechanism of recovery. Governments as well as electoral spheres are reticent to biopolitical incursions, historically associated with panoptic systems. I claim that it is time to plead for positivising biopolitics as political humanism. My research will expose twelve themes for disseminating biopolitics as political humanism, focused on sensitive...
Current Sociology
This conclusion revisits the COVID-19 pandemic from the broader perspective of a changing global world. It raises questions regarding the opportunities for global learning under conditions of global divisions and competition and includes learning from the Other, governing within a changing public sphere, and challenging national cultural practices. Moreover, it exemplifies how the society–nature–technology nexus has become crucial for understanding and reconstructing the dynamics of the coronavirus crisis such as the assemblages of geographical conditions, technological means and the governing of ignorance, the occurrence of hotspots as well as living under lockdown conditions. It finishes with some preliminary suggestions how reoccurring pandemics might contribute to long-term changes in human attitudes and behaviour towards the environment and a technologically shaped lifeworld.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019
International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology (IJIRCST), 2024
Sustainability, 2024
Biotechnology Journal International
Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1997
Parezja. Czasopismo Forum Młodych Pedagogów przy Komitecie Nauk Pedagogicznych PAN
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2019
John Green "The Fault in Our Stars" „Вината в нашите звезди“ от Джон Грийн, 2025
The Journal of Urology, 2018
International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi dergisi, 2022
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 2016
FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2008