Well worth readingFull disclosure: I am the George Higgins referred to in the book as Howard Junker’s fraternity Big Brother, the psychologist who worked with LGBTQ people, and as a founder of a clinic for transsexual persons. I concentrated on individual counseling and dealt with 700 persons who identified as transsexual. By the time I retired from practice in 2000, the discussion about LGBTQ persons was shifting from how to aid persons trying to understand themselves and forge their own personal lives, to a complex political dialog in which LGBTQ individuals were pawns on the political chess board, once again being told who they were and how they ought to live.Junker makes the unnecessary but currently required claim that as a cis-gendered white man he is ill-placed to conduct a tour of the closet. As a long time psychotherapist I can testify that one is much more likely to hear and understand those who are very different from one’s self than ones who are similar. With those too similar it is difficult not to hear only one’s own voice.I was beyond delighted to find Junker’s book to be the most intellectually honest work I have encountered on the subject of LGBTQ in at least a decade. Perhaps even, it is the the first since Evelyn Hooker’s first research reports in the 1960s. He comes to his search, his “project” as he calls it, as a describer and as a collector of information. He seems as free from bias or of underlying intentions as one could ask. His only hypothesis, clearly started at the outset, is that the problems of the LGBTQ group are not if their own making. The evidence he presents compellingly supports his suspicion.There are data I wish he had included, such as a report of the beloved and revered Sarah Gibson Blanding, president of Vassar College of the late 50’s and early 60’s, quite literally blackmailing an undergraduate student to reveal the names of lesbian women undergraduates. (MacKay and Faderman’s Wolf Girls at Vassar.) The Junker era was vicious indeed.Junker, in an uncharacteristic mood for this book so free of personal agenda, expresses dismay and disappointment that former faculty members of his time, and the current president of Amherst, Biddy Martin, would not talk freely with him. These people, however, all came of age before Stonewall in 1969 and before a president of the United States could champion the rights of LGBTQ persons in an inaugural address. I think their reluctance is evidence of the extreme depth and perseverance of the horror of being queer that existed before and during the era Junker illuminates so well. They are evidence of the truth he describes.This is a valuable book well worth reading.2