Audiobook6 hours
Language, Truth and Logic
Written by A. J. Ayer
Narrated by Michael Lunts
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
()
Philosophy
Logic
Philosophical Analysis
Verification Principle
Perception
Philosophical Debate
Power of Knowledge
Enlightenment
Intellectual Protagonist
Academic Rivalry
Nature of Reality
Limits of Knowledge
Nature of Truth
Limits of Reason
Exploration of Abstract Concepts
Analytic Propositions
Phenomenalism
Empiricism
Metaphysics
About this audiobook
The front cover of the second edition of Language, Truth and Logic carried this statement in capital letters: ‘THE CLASSIC TEXT WHICH FOUNDED LOGICAL POSITIVISM - AND MODERN BRITISH PHILOSOPHY.'
It was a bold statement, but the book, first published in 1936 when A. J. Ayer was just 25 and a lecturer on philosophy at Christ Church, Oxford, drew unstinting praise from leading figures in the field, including Bertrand Russell. Its effect was to ‘sweep away the cobwebs and revitalise British philosophy and it continued to make an international impact on 20th century thought'.
The outline on the back of the first edition laid out the ground. ‘This book will appeal not merely to philosophical specialists but to all those who are in any way concerned about the nature and scope of human knowledge. The author deserves the gratitude of all students of philosophy for his clear and definitive exposition of the purpose and method of a philosophical enquiry. Relying on the principle that a statement of fact, to be genuine, must be empirically verifiable, he demonstrates the impossibility of any system of speculative philosophy which attempts to transcend the field of natural science and shows that if philosophy is to make good its claim to be a genuine branch of knowledge, it must confine itself to works of clarification and analysis.
And he describes how the philosopher, by the provision of definitions and the examination of their consequences, perfects our understanding of the propositions that are expressed in the language of science and in that of everyday life.
In this way the author succeeds in bridging the gap between philosophy and science which was one of the most unfortunate legacies of the 19th century. He shows that philosophy and science, so far from being competing brands of knowledge, are complementary to one another. The philosopher finds in the theories of the scientist the richest material for his analyses; the scientist looks to the philosopher to dispel the confusions which result from the use of unanalysed concepts, and to formulate definitions which will lead to the development of new and fruitful theories.
In addition, the author succeeds in settling the old controversy between science and religion, by proving that there cannot be any logical ground of enmity between them. For the statements of the theist, in so far as they involve the assertion of the existence of a transcendent God, are found to be devoid of literal significance, since they are not empirically verifiable.
They are expressions of feeling, and not statements of fact; and, consequently, they cannot possibly come into contradiction with any scientific hypothesis. And the book deals no less conclusively with the question of personal survival. It is shown that the empirical self cannot possibly survive since its self-identity must be defined in terms of the self-identity of the body; and that the assumption of the existence of a metaphysical soul as distinct from the empirical self is not a genuine hypothesis.
Particular interest will be aroused by the author's treatment of the propositions of logic and mathematics, which he regards as tautologies, by his method of dealing with the question What is truth? and above all by his attempt to provide a definitive solution of all the most important problems which have given rise to disputes among philosophers in the past. Historically this book marks a return to the principles of English empiricism which were
It was a bold statement, but the book, first published in 1936 when A. J. Ayer was just 25 and a lecturer on philosophy at Christ Church, Oxford, drew unstinting praise from leading figures in the field, including Bertrand Russell. Its effect was to ‘sweep away the cobwebs and revitalise British philosophy and it continued to make an international impact on 20th century thought'.
The outline on the back of the first edition laid out the ground. ‘This book will appeal not merely to philosophical specialists but to all those who are in any way concerned about the nature and scope of human knowledge. The author deserves the gratitude of all students of philosophy for his clear and definitive exposition of the purpose and method of a philosophical enquiry. Relying on the principle that a statement of fact, to be genuine, must be empirically verifiable, he demonstrates the impossibility of any system of speculative philosophy which attempts to transcend the field of natural science and shows that if philosophy is to make good its claim to be a genuine branch of knowledge, it must confine itself to works of clarification and analysis.
And he describes how the philosopher, by the provision of definitions and the examination of their consequences, perfects our understanding of the propositions that are expressed in the language of science and in that of everyday life.
In this way the author succeeds in bridging the gap between philosophy and science which was one of the most unfortunate legacies of the 19th century. He shows that philosophy and science, so far from being competing brands of knowledge, are complementary to one another. The philosopher finds in the theories of the scientist the richest material for his analyses; the scientist looks to the philosopher to dispel the confusions which result from the use of unanalysed concepts, and to formulate definitions which will lead to the development of new and fruitful theories.
In addition, the author succeeds in settling the old controversy between science and religion, by proving that there cannot be any logical ground of enmity between them. For the statements of the theist, in so far as they involve the assertion of the existence of a transcendent God, are found to be devoid of literal significance, since they are not empirically verifiable.
They are expressions of feeling, and not statements of fact; and, consequently, they cannot possibly come into contradiction with any scientific hypothesis. And the book deals no less conclusively with the question of personal survival. It is shown that the empirical self cannot possibly survive since its self-identity must be defined in terms of the self-identity of the body; and that the assumption of the existence of a metaphysical soul as distinct from the empirical self is not a genuine hypothesis.
Particular interest will be aroused by the author's treatment of the propositions of logic and mathematics, which he regards as tautologies, by his method of dealing with the question What is truth? and above all by his attempt to provide a definitive solution of all the most important problems which have given rise to disputes among philosophers in the past. Historically this book marks a return to the principles of English empiricism which were
Related to Language, Truth and Logic
Related audiobooks
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics that Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Philosophical Enquiry into the Sublime and Beautiful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Critique of Practical Reason Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPragmatism and The Meaning of Truth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Hume's Dialogues Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Treatise of Human Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMysticism and Logic Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Logic of Scientific Discovery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTractatus Logico-Philosophicus: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elements of the Philosophy of Right Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics: Essay on the Freedom of the Will, the Basis of Morality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDescartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Short History of Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to Wittgenstein Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Meditations/Discourse on the Method Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Creative Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMatter and Memory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeditations on First Philosophy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Science of Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wisdom of Life, Counsels and Maxims Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mortal Questions (Canto Classics) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCritique of Judgement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrincipia Ethica Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The World As Will and Idea Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Utilitarianism/On Liberty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrinciples of Psicology - William James Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Philosophy For You
Four Thousand Weeks: Time Management for Mortals Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5101 Essays That Will Change The Way You Think Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Stoic Mindset: Living the Ten Principles of Stoicism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Disliked: How to Free Yourself, Change Your Life, and Achieve Real Happiness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dao De Jing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Problem of Pain Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Five Rings Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Communicating Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/512 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Many Lives, Many Masters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Tao of Pooh Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary: The Laws of Human Nature: by Robert Greene: Key Takeaways, Summary & Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Know a Person: The Art of Seeing Others Deeply and Being Deeply Seen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Living: Peace and Freedom in the Here and Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stoicism: How to Use Stoic Philosophy to Find Inner Peace and Happiness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Emperor's Handbook: A New Translation of The Meditations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Conscious: A Brief Guide to the Fundamental Mystery of the Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The More of Less Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Heretic's Handbook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5People of the Lie Vol. 1: Toward a Psychology of Evil Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Obstacle Is the Way: The Timeless Art of Turning Trials into Triumph Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/512 Rules for Life by Jordan B. Peterson - Book Summary: An Antidote to Chaos Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Language, Truth and Logic
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings
0 ratings0 reviews