Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45
    US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45
    US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45
    Ebook215 pages2 hours

    US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45

    By Steven J Zaloga

    3.5/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    The delivery of entire divisions to battlefields behind enemy lines by parachute and glider was a unique feature of World War II.

    By the end of the war the US Army deployed the largest airborne force in the world, created in only three years, and boasting such impressive units as the 82nd "All American" and 101st "Screaming Eagles." This book details the organization and operation history of these units throughout the war in Northwest Europe from 1944 to 1945, covering the desperate night drops over Normandy in support of the D-Day invasions, through the capture of Nijmegen during Operation Market-Garden to Operation Varsity, the last great airborne operation of the war to secure the crossing of the Rhine.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherBloomsbury Publishing
    Release dateJan 20, 2013
    ISBN9781472800701
    US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45
    Author

    Steven J Zaloga

    Steven J. Zaloga is a senior analyst for Teal Group Corp., an aerospace consulting firm, where he covers missile and drone technology as well as international arms transfers for clients in the aerospace industry and the government. He served for more than two decades as an adjunct staff member with the Strategy, Forces, and Resources division of the Institute for Defense Analyses, a federal think-tank, retiring in 2021. He is the author of numerous books on military technology and history, including NVG 294 Allied Tanks in Normandy 1944 and NVG 283 American Guided Missiles of World War II. He currently lives in Maryland, USA.

    Read more from Steven J Zaloga

    Related to US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45

    Related ebooks

    Wars & Military For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • UNLIMITED

      Mcdonnell F2h Banshee

      Oct 6, 2022

      Mcdonnell F2h Banshee
      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Shake ’n Bake Sergeants

      Dec 1, 2020

      Shake ’n Bake Sergeants
      10 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Homegrown War Games

      Jul 31, 2018

      Homegrown War Games
      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Luftwaffe And Top Billing

      Jun 3, 2022

      When it comes to desirability in collector circles, the Luftwaffe (LW) may take top billing. Which is interesting, for Kriegsmarine material is scarcer, Waffen-SS both rare and notorious. Heer mementos are lots more plentiful, but too often deemed “c

      1 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Battle Of St Vith

      Feb 26, 2020

      The Battle Of St Vith
      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Long View

      Dec 21, 2021

      The Long View
      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      In The Ranks

      Jan 22, 2018

      In The Ranks
      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      D-day Tank Operations

      Apr 18, 2019

      Unusual tanks are developed by the British 79th Armoured Division for the planned invasion of Normandy. Based on Churchill or Sherman tanks, these armoured vehicles can – among other things – demolish concrete structures, fill trenches, lay matting a

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Battle Of New Orleans

      Nov 1, 2018

      WORDS MARC DESANTIS  FORTS JACKSON AND ST PHILIP, NEAR NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 18-24 APRIL 1862 “THE WAR FOR THE MISSISSIPPI WOULD BE ONE OF NOT JUST RIVERINE NAVAL FORCES BUT ALSO OF FORTIFICATIONS AND GUN BATTERIES SITUATED ON ITS BANKS” Stretchi

      13 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Angels From Above

      Feb 16, 2021

      Angels From Above
      10 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Eb-66 Destroyer

      Nov 8, 2022

      The Eb-66 Destroyer
      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Soldier Of Misfortune

      Aug 6, 2019

      Soldier Of Misfortune
      15 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Island Fortress

      May 23, 2023

      Island Fortress
      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Men Poured In A Deadly Volley

      May 7, 2021

      The Men Poured In A Deadly Volley
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Battle Of Kawanakajima

      Nov 5, 2020

      Battle Of Kawanakajima
      7 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Red Ball Express

      Oct 3, 2019

      The Red Ball Express
      1 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      An Almost-perfect Surprise Attack

      Sep 7, 2021

      An Almost-perfect Surprise Attack
      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Reconquering The Empire

      Jan 20, 2022

      Reconquering The Empire
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Hitler's Foreign Legions

      Jan 24, 2019

      Hitler's Foreign Legions
      13 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      French 75mm M1897 Field Gun

      Jan 10, 2023

      French 75mm M1897 Field Gun
      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Colin Powell

      Dec 3, 2019

      Colin Powell
      12 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Bloodiest Day

      Aug 15, 2023

      The Bloodiest Day
      7 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Isolated At Bloody Gulch

      Mar 7, 2022

      Isolated At Bloody Gulch
      7 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45

    3.5/5

    2 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45 - Steven J Zaloga

      Glossary

      Introduction

      By the end of World War II, the US Army deployed the largest airborne force in the world, created in barely three years. Airborne operations were a revolutionary tactic that transcended the limits of traditional linear land warfare by conducting combat missions deep in the enemy rear through the use of airlift. During the final year of the war, the US Army conducted four airborne operations in the ETO. The airborne drops behind Utah Beach on D-Day were a tactical disappointment due to the wide dispersion of the airborne units after a confused night drop. In spite of this the mission was an operational success since it managed to disrupt the German defenses even if not in the fashion intended. Operation Dragoon in southern France on August 15, 1944, was the smallest of these operations and the least consequential since German resistance in the area was so weak. The boldest of the missions, Operation Market in September 1944, was part of a larger British scheme to seize a bridgehead over the Rhine at Arnhem. Although the overall mission failed, the two US airborne divisions taking part fulfilled their tactical objectives in a clear demonstration of the potential of airborne operations. The final airborne mission of the war, Operation Varsity in March 1945, was the best executed of the wartime airborne missions and spearheaded the British advance over the Rhine. Ultimately, the airborne divisions never lived up to their revolutionary promise. Airborne operations proved to be extremely complex to conduct and were too few in number to substantially affect the course of the campaigns in Northwest Europe. Yet the combat performance of the US airborne divisions was so outstanding that they have become a fixture in the US Army ever since.

      Where is the Prince who can afford so to cover his country with troops for its defense, as that ten thousand men descending from the clouds, might not, in many places, do an infinite deal of mischief before a force could be brought together to repel them? So wrote one of America’s founding fathers, Benjamin Franklin in 1784, in a remarkably futuristic vision of warfare by balloon. In France in 1918, another visionary, Gen. Billy Mitchell, convinced Gen. Pershing to begin plans to drop an entire division of troops from bombers to take the fortress city of Metz from the air. The war ended before the plans could take shape. But curiously enough, the officer assigned the task of studying this project was Lewis Brereton, who would lead the US airborne force a quarter century later.

      A dramatic scene from Landing Zone W on September 23, 1944, during Operation Market with CG-4A gliders of recently landed elements of the 101st Airborne Division in the foreground while in the background, the C-47 transports of the 315th Troop Carrier Group drop elements of the 1st Polish Parachute Brigade on Drop Zone O near Overasselt. (NARA)

      When the idea of airborne troops was revived some 20 years later, the initial debate focused on who would actually train and command the force. The US Army’s Chief of Infantry proposed the creation of a small air infantry force in March 1939 as the Marines of the Air Corps, or air grenadiers. The engineers argued that they should be placed under their control since their primary mission initially was seen as rear area demolition and sabotage. The War Department’s G-3 section wanted them placed under their control as a strategic reserve of the general headquarters. The Army Air Force (AAF) wanted them under their control since their aircraft would be an integral part in the operations.

      The startling success of German paratroopers at Eben Emael in Belgium in May 1940 made clear the potential of airborne forces and helped ensure the establishment of a counterpart organization in the US Army. In August 1940, the US Army General Staff finally decided to leave the new air infantry forces under the Chief of Infantry. A test platoon was formed at Fort Benning in June 1940, expanded to a battalion in September 1940. Later German operations, such as the airborne assault on Crete in May 1941, suggested that airborne forces could conduct missions much more substantial than mere airborne raids. The US Army quickly absorbed these lessons and the infant airborne force expanded rapidly following the US entry into the war in December 1941.

      In March 1942, the Provisional Parachute Group at Ft. Benning became a formal part of the Army Ground Forces (AGF) as the new Airborne Command. Col. William C. Lee, who had been instrumental in the formation of the first US airborne units, headed this organization. By the summer of 1942, the Airborne Command had four principal units: three parachute infantry regiments (501st, 502nd and 503rd) and one airborne (glider) infantry regiment (the 88th). Equally important, in April 1942, the AAF formed the Air Transport Command responsible for the delivery of parachute troops, airborne infantry and glider units. At the time, three methods of airborne delivery were considered viable: parachute, glider and airborne landing. The presumption was that paratroopers would be used in any operation as the spearhead to seize a landing zone for gliders or an enemy airstrip for air-landing troops. The idea of air-landing infantry troops behind enemy lines at a captured airfield was based on the German use of this tactic on Crete in 1941, and the idea of glider landings was inspired both by Eben Emael and Crete.

      The US airborne did not have a centralized command structure comparable to the German XI Fliegerkorps, which combined both the air transport formations and air-landing troops under a single tactical organization. This was made simpler by the fact that both elements were part of the Luftwaffe, while in the American case the two elements were divided between the AAF and AGF. Although various schemes were put forward to better coordinate these two commands, the substantial difficulties of raising and training the new formations, as well as inter-service rivalries, diverted attention from this issue. By the time that US airborne divisions were ready for commitment in the ETO, the broader issue of the coordination of US troop carrier units and their British counterparts, as well as coordination of US and British airborne operations, had become a much more vital issue.

      The original US airborne force was based around regiments, not divisions, on the assumption that this would provide greater flexibility in planning and executing missions. However, the Germans had evidently used divisions on Crete and, by early 1942, the US Army was thinking along the same lines. At first, the AGF headquarters simply wanted to assign the airborne mission to normal infantry divisions that would receive additional training. However, airborne advocates strongly objected to this idea on the grounds that the infantry division organization was ill suited to air-landing operations and that the personnel would require too much specialized parachute training. By the summer of 1942, the consensus had reverted back to the idea of dedicated airborne divisions and Lee was dispatched to Great Britain to examine the British organization. Lee recommended the British mix of two parachute and one glider regiments per division, but the head of the AGF, Gen. Lesley McNair, preferred a mix of two glider and one parachute regiments. The argument over the balance of forces within the airborne was based partly on tactics and partly on economy. Parachute troops were seen as elite troops requiring more stringent recruitment practices and a much higher level of training. The regular infantry was wary of letting these units expand too much as there was the feeling that this would drain infantry units of highly motivated young troops who would otherwise serve as small unit tactical leaders in the regular infantry divisions. In contrast, glider infantry was not expected to require a high level of specialized individual training, and gliders were envisioned as cheap and reusable. From this perspective, the parachute regiment would serve as the spearhead to land and secure the landing zone, and would be followed by the glider regiments and perhaps some air-landed units as well. As a result, the first airborne divisions formed in August 1942, the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions, both had a mix of one parachute and two glider regiments. As we shall see, this issue would remain contentious through 1943–44.

      The Douglas C-47 Skytrain was the workhorse of the Army Air Force transport squadrons, and this restored example is displayed at the air museum at Le Bourget airfield in France. (Author’s collection)

      Combat mission

      The most obvious difference between airborne units and conventional infantry was the use of air transport to deliver the units into combat. This had important implications in their combat mission. In order to be air transportable, airborne infantry were invariably lighter armed than comparable infantry units and had much more limited logistical support. Since the airborne units would be landed at some depth behind enemy lines and fight in isolation for some time, these factors strongly shaped the missions assigned to airborne divisions. The role of these formations was envisioned as complete commitment by air, seizure of essential but limited objectives and quick relief by juncture with the associated main ground effort.

      As a result of these factors, several missions were seen as particularly suitable for airborne operations, with two being the primary missions. The first mission was to seize, hold or otherwise exploit important tactical locations in conjunction with, or pending the arrival of, other

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1
      pFad - Phonifier reborn

      Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

      Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


      Alternative Proxies:

      Alternative Proxy

      pFad Proxy

      pFad v3 Proxy

      pFad v4 Proxy