Kinship and Social Organisation
()
About this ebook
Read more from W. H. R. Rivers
Kinship and Social Organisation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInstinct and the Unconscious Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConflict and Dreams Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Todas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Kinship and Social Organisation
Related ebooks
Sociology and Modern Social Problems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSex and Salvation: Imagining the Future in Madagascar Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wisdom of FDR Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Social Media in Southeast Turkey: Love, Kinship and Politics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From Left Communism to Post-modernism: Reconsidering Emancipatory Discourse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrowing Old in a New China: Transitions in Elder Care Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNostalgia for the Future: West Africa after the Cold War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Past in Pieces: Belonging in the New Cyprus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Making and Unmaking of Differences: Anthropological, Sociological and Philosophical Perspectives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGale Researcher Guide for: Sociology of Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOne Matchless Time: A Life of William Faulkner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tintinnabulation of Literary Theory: Traversing Genres to Contemporary Experience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGender in Focus: Identities, Codes, Stereotypes and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRepresenting the Male: Masculinity, Genre and Social Context in Six South Wales Novels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSubalternity, Antagonism, Autonomy: Constructing the Political Subject Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Politics of Affective Societies: An Interdisciplinary Essay Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRethinking Internal Displacement: Geo-political Games, Fragile States and the Relief Industry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnderstanding Others: Peoples, Animals, Pasts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCounterStories from the Writing Center Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSolidarity in Conflict: A Democratic Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeconstructing the Death Penalty: Derrida's Seminars and the New Abolitionism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrust, Democracy, and Multicultural Challenges Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Shiri Eisner's Bi Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Republic of the Living: Biopolitics and the Critique of Civil Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Discursive Ecology of Homophobia: Unraveling Anti-LGBTQ Speech on the European Far Right Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrienting Virtue: Civic Identity and Orientalism in Britain's Global Eighteenth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnduring Polygamy: Plural Marriage and Social Change in an African Metropolis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHierarchy and Value: Comparative Perspectives on Moral Order Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeginners' Guide To Journalism & Mass Communication: Effective guide to write well, influence people and remain in news Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reference For You
The Elements of Style, Fourth Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Learn Sign Language in a Hurry: Grasp the Basics of American Sign Language Quickly and Easily Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51,001 Facts that Will Scare the S#*t Out of You: The Ultimate Bathroom Reader Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liespotting: Proven Techniques to Detect Deception Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Emotion Thesaurus (Second Edition): A Writer's Guide to Character Expression Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Spy the Lie: Former CIA Officers Teach You How to Detect Deception Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mythology 101: From Gods and Goddesses to Monsters and Mortals, Your Guide to Ancient Mythology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Everything Sign Language Book: American Sign Language Made Easy... All new photos! Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Legal Words You Should Know: Over 1,000 Essential Terms to Understand Contracts, Wills, and the Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51001 First Lines Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Dictionary of Symbols Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Show, Don't Tell: How to Write Vivid Descriptions, Handle Backstory, and Describe Your Characters’ Emotions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5THE EMOTIONAL WOUND THESAURUS: A Writer's Guide to Psychological Trauma Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Card Games: The Complete Rules to the Classics, Family Favorites, and Forgotten Games Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings400 Things Cops Know: Street-Smart Lessons from a Veteran Patrolman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51200 Creative Writing Prompts (Adventures in Writing) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bored Games: 100+ In-Person and Online Games to Keep Everyone Entertained Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The 365 Bullet Guide: Organize Your Life Creatively, One Day at a Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related categories
Reviews for Kinship and Social Organisation
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Kinship and Social Organisation - W. H. R. Rivers
W. H. R. Rivers
Kinship and Social Organisation
Published by Good Press, 2022
goodpress@okpublishing.info
EAN 4057664576392
Table of Contents
PREFACE.
LECTURE I
LECTURE II
LECTURE III
INDEX
LIST OF STUDIES IN ECONOMICS & POLITICAL SCIENCE.
PREFACE.
Table of Contents
These lectures were delivered at the London School of Economics in May of the present year. They are largely based on experience gained in the work of the Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to Melanesia of 1908, and give a simplified record of social conditions which will be described in detail in the full account of the work of that expedition.
A few small additions and modifications have been made since the lectures were given, some of these being due to suggestions made by Professor Westermarck and Dr. Malinowski in the discussions which followed the lectures. I am also indebted to Miss B. Freire-Marreco for allowing me to refer to unpublished material collected during her recent work among the Pueblo Indians of North America.
W. H. R. Rivers.
St. John’s College,
Cambridge.
November 19th, 1913.
KINSHIP AND SOCIAL
ORGANISATION
LECTURE I
Table of Contents
The aim of these lectures is to demonstrate the close connection which exists between methods of denoting relationship or kinship and forms of social organisation, including those based on different varieties of the institution of marriage. In other words, my aim will be to show that the terminology of relationship has been rigorously determined by social conditions and that, if this position has been established and accepted, systems of relationship furnish us with a most valuable instrument in studying the history of social institutions.
In the controversy of the present and of recent times, it is the special mode of denoting relationship known as the classificatory system which has formed the chief subject of discussion. It is in connection with this system that there have arisen the various vexed questions which have so excited the interest—I might almost say the passions—of sociologists during the last quarter of a century.
I am afraid it would be dangerous to assume your familiarity with this system, and I must therefore begin with a brief description of its main characters. The essential feature of the classificatory system, that to which it owes its name, is the application of its terms, not to single individual persons, but to classes of relatives which may often be very large. Objections have been made to the use of the term classificatory
on the ground that our own terms of relationship also apply to classes of persons; the term brother,
for instance, to all the male children of the same father and mother, the term uncle
to all the brothers of the father and mother as well as to the husband of an aunt, while the term cousin
may denote a still larger class. It is, of course, true that many of our own terms of relationship apply to classes of persons, but in the systems to which the word classificatory
is usually applied, the classificatory principle applies far more widely, and in some cases even, more logically and consistently. In the most complete form of the classificatory system there is not one single term of relationship the use of which tells us that reference is being made to one person and to one person only, whereas in our own system there are six such terms, viz., husband, wife, father, mother, father-in-law and mother-in-law. In those systems in which the classificatory principle is carried to its extreme degree every term is applied to a class of persons. The term father,
for instance, is applied to all those whom the father would call brother, and to all the husbands of those whom the mother calls sister, both brother and sister being used in a far wider sense than among ourselves. In some forms of the classificatory system the term father
is also used for all those whom the mother would call brother, and for all the husbands of those whom the father would call sister, and in other systems the application of the term may be still more extensive. Similarly, the term used for the wife may be applied to all those whom the wife would call sister and to the wives of all those whom the speaker calls brother, brother and sister again being used in a far wider sense than in our own language.
The classificatory system has many other features which mark it off more or less sharply from our own mode of denoting relationship, but I do not think it would be profitable to attempt a full description at this stage of our enquiry. As I have said, the object of these lectures is to show how the various features of the classificatory system have arisen out of, and can therefore be explained historically by, social facts. If you are not already acquainted with these features, you will learn to know them the more easily if at the same time you learn how they have come into existence.
I will begin with a brief history of the subject. So long as it was supposed that all the peoples of the world denoted relationship in the same way, namely, that which is customary among ourselves, there was no problem. There was no reason why the subject should have awakened any interest, and so far as I have been able to find, it is only since the discovery of the classificatory system of relationship that the problem now before us was ever raised. I imagine that, if students ever thought about the matter at all, it must have seemed obvious that the way in which they and the other known peoples of the world used terms of relationship was conditioned and determined by the social relations which the terms denoted.
The state of affairs became very different as soon as it was known that many peoples of the world use terms of relationship in a manner, and according to rules, so widely different from our own that they seem to belong to an altogether different order, a difference well illustrated by the confusion which is apt to arise when we use English words in the translation of classificatory terms or classificatory terms as the equivalents of our own. The difficulty or impossibility of conforming to complete truth and reality, when we attempt this task, is the best witness to the fundamental difference between the two modes of denoting relationship.
I do not know of any discovery in the whole range of science which can be more certainly put to the credit of one man than that of the classificatory system of relationship by Lewis Morgan. By this I mean, not merely that he was the first to point out clearly the existence of this mode of denoting relationship, but that it was he who collected the vast mass of material by which the essential characters of the system were demonstrated, and it was he who was the first to recognise the great theoretical importance of his new discovery. It is the denial of this importance by his contemporaries and successors which furnishes the best proof of the credit which is due to him for the discovery. The very extent of the material he collected[1] has probably done much to obstruct the recognition of the importance of his work. It is a somewhat discouraging thought that, if Morgan had been less industrious and had amassed a smaller collection of material which could have been embodied in a more available form, the value of his work would probably have been far