1

A Case for Specialization in Scouting

For many years football scouting has been an accepted and important phase of the game. The objective of scouting has been, and still is, to get as much useful information about a future opponent as possible. A more practical objective. however, seems to be to get as much usable information as can be utilized to either (1) help formulate game plans, or (2) better prepare various individual players to either combat the strength, or take advantage of the weaknesses of an individual or an opposing team. It appears that if any information obtained does not fall into one of those two categories, then it is worthless.

Football has undergone many changes in the past few years. It has become a much more complicated game than it was twenty years ago, or even ten years ago. The game is more demanding today than it was several years back, of both the players and the coaches. This is not to be interpreted to mean that players or coaches work harder today than in the past, but to indicate that they have to work on more developed phases of the game. Some thirty years ago the offenses used in football were, for the most part, limited. Defenses were stereotyped, and pass defense took a relatively small amount of practice time, or pregame thought. The coaching staffs were certainly not as large, nor were they as specialized as they are today.

One of the prime reasons for this great advancement in football can certainly be attributed to the wide use and refinement of movies. It was not too many years ago when a football scout could come back with a report on an opponent, and that would be the last and only word on that team. With more teams making use of movies as a coaching aid, however, it was but a matter of time until coaches began to exchange movies with each other. It is believed that the original idea was for one coach to give another coach his movie of a mutual opponent, if that second coach would reciprocate with a film which would be equally beneficial. The coaches in the Southeastern Conference were among the pioneers in this practice. Many other conferences frowned upon this at first, but now the practice is generally accepted. In many instances it has come to a direct exchange of an agreed number of films between schools.

Undoubtedly one of the prime reasons for getting these movies was to get additional information on opponents to be met, information which could go beyond that obtained by scouting alone. This quite naturally led to the point that coaches knew more about their opponents, and consequently, this led in turn to more and better ways of doing things, both offensively and defensively. If a coach formerly had succeeded in keeping some secrets from the scouts, secrets certainly could not be hidden from the movie cameras.

In this day of modern science and transportation, it is possible for a scout to come back to his school with the movies of the game he saw some twenty-four hours before. Game films can be processed in a matter of hours; the scout can then pick them up and bring them back with him. Most colleges will have received movies of their opponents by Monday, which gives them adequate time to study and utilize information obtained to formulate game plans for a Saturday game. This widespread use of movies has made the scout realize that his work is under close scutiny, and as a result, his word is no longer necessarily the last word on that opponent.

The question arises in many minds, why scout when movies are available? This seems a logical question, and in fact sometimes the use of movies does cut down on the amount of scouting done. Not all game movies are taken with the same skill, however, or for that matter with the same equipment, and oftentimes the pictures do not show as much as many head coaches would like to see. The wide-scope lens has come into fairly wide use among the major colleges in the nation, but for the smaller schools the equipment used to take this type of picture in many instances is too expensive. Many movies used by colleges today do not, for example, show the defensive backfield men, yet most coaches will agree that a mistake by one backfield man will result in a touchdown or a long gain more often than a mistake made by any other player on the team.

Regardless of whether the accent is on scouting, the use of movies, or a combination of the two methods, it is generally agreed that advance information on an opponent is important and necessary. The ultimate objective is the same. However, the importance of the material increases in proportion to the amount of it that can be absorbed and utilized by the players. If they can not or do not use it, then its value is questionable. The decision of whether it can be carried through to the players is the responsibility of the scout, as well as of the rest of the coaching staff.

Since football has become more complicated, by necessity the scouting reports have also become more complex. The football scout has been able to analyze these more thorough reports, and as a result has come up with many more tendencies and factors to be considered in game preparations than in the past. The point can be reached, and undoubtedly has been, where too much has been given to the players to absorb; they become confused, and in many cases get much less out of a report than they should. Great care should be taken to see that this does not happen. Important strengths and weaknesses must be emphasized, and as much additional material as can be absorbed may be added later.

Basically, every football team has a pattern. It is the purpose of scouting, and the analysis of the scouting, to establish what the pattern is and how to defend as best you can against the strength and take advantage of the weaknesses. Each coach will obviously stress that which he feels his team can do best and will instruct and coach his quarterbacks to call the plays that have been the most successful. Scouting should determine what an opposing team’s strength is; then it is up to the staff to determine how to combat this in the most effective ways known. Every effort should be made to stop what the opponent does best. If you are unsuccessful in accomplishing this, it can generally be attributed to two things: first, that adequate preparation was not made, or second, that proper preparation was made, but the opponent had better personnel and you were unable to cope with them. If they had the advantage in personnel, there is little else that could have been done. It is logical to think that a coach’s philosophy should be: Be strong against a team’s strength. Be alert for anything that they have shown. If they do beat you, make them do it with something that they haven’t shown before.

Although scouting has improved along with the rest of the game of football, it is questionable that it has developed at the same rate or anywhere near the same pace shown for the rest of the game. Scouting has not received the same attention as other phases of the game, at least as far as written material or lectures are concerned. Of the many clinics attended by the author since 1946, never has scouting been a topic of lecture, although every other phase of the game has been discussed from A to Z and back again. There have been many fine books written by talented coaches on many phases of the game, but only an occasional chapter is devoted to scouting. Much more knowledge about this part of football could be disseminated. It would be beneficial to the game as well as to the coaches. This would help to do away with much of the trial and error that the young and inexperienced scout now goes through.

Some factors, however, have been instrumental in the advancement of scouting. The reception of the scouts into the press box, together with the facilities afforded them, has made the scout’s work easier and more efficient. It is important to be seated high in the stadium, in a seat perpendicular to the field, and have a place to write in comfort with no need to worry about any uncertainties in the weather. Scouts in the press box are afforded all the courtesies of the press, including prompt delivery of statistics and play-by-play accounts. There are still a number of schools which do not offer these conveniences, but they are diminishing every year. If press box seats are not available, most schools will provide seats for scouts to sit together in an area where the field of vision is excellent. A scout usually receives the utmost courtesy from the school he visits.

Although many phases of football and scouting have changed and improved, there is still a wide-spread belief among many coaches that scouting is not a special skill and that practically everybody on the staff should scout during the year. From the moment a young coach enters the profession, he knows that as soon as the season begins he is undoubtedly going to be asked to scout. Those beginners who have an opportunity to get some background by accompanying an experienced coach on a scouting assignment are indeed fortunate. Many are sent out with little more training than that which they received when they played the game. This becomes very evident when one sits close to many such inexperienced coaches in press boxes throughout the country.

One instance during the 1959 season readily stands out. The scout had a truly outstanding career as both a college and professional player, but this was undoubtedly one of his first ventures as a scout. He was utterly bewildered as the defensive team jumped from one defense to another. It was a relatively simple maneuver, since all the team did was go from a Wide 6 defense to a Split 6 defense, or reverse the procedure. He was so upset in his own mind because he could not analyze the defenses that he was able to get little the team did on offense, since he could not concentrate on it.

A similar incident took place during the 1960 season, when two young and obviously inexperienced coaches were scouting a traditional foe to be met in two weeks. The opponent of the team they were scouting was running from both an unbalanced and balanced line, but they were not aware of it. They had great difficulty in determining what defenses their future opponent was using because of the varying offensive picture. One time the middle guard would be over the offensive center, and possibly the next time he would be over one of the guards to the unbalanced side of the line. This went undetected until the fourth quarter when finally it was called to their attention by another scout. Once they were aware of this varying offensive picture, they were able to salvage something from their afternoon at the game. However, they certainly did not get all the information about that team that they should have been able to get. Needless to say, both games were lost by the teams whose scouts were confused. It is possible that such confusion could have been the contributing factor, because neither head coach of the schools involved could have had the information about his opponent that he should have had in order for his players to go into the game as well prepared as they might have. The scouts should not be blamed entirely, as they surely wanted to do as well as they could on the basis of their knowledge, preparation, and experience. Somebody on the staff should have made an effort to give them some background on scouting—and it is questionable whether they should have been assigned such important games.

It does seem strange that some head coaches feel that any coach, regardless of experience, can scout a football game. This is not necessarily true. It takes a coach with at least an interest in scouting, plus a varied knowledge of different phases of the game, to become a good scout. An interest in scouting is of prime importance, and acceptance of the challenge that it offers will overcome, to some extent, inexperience. Quite naturally, no one can start out with experience, so what does the inexperienced coach do to gain knowledge and background that will be beneficial? Several things that can be done will be dealt with in the next chapter.

SETTING UP A SCOUTING SCHEDULE

There are many different ways scouting schedules can be set up within a coaching staff, whether it be high school or college. These can be dictated by size of the staff, by finances, by conference rules, and by the wishes of the head coach. Regardless of what governs the scouting setup at any school, the author feels a mistake is made unless the same coaches on the staff do all of the scouting. More can be said in favor of this system than can be said against it.

One of the most common arrangements in use today is to have one scout follow a team for a set number of games and then use him in the press box on the day of the game with that opponent. He may be upstairs with a coach or coaches who have the press-box responsibility every week, or he may be up there alone. If a coach follows a team for three weeks, he should have that team well scouted and be very familiar with everything the team does. On the day of the game it should be a simple matter for him to spot any innovations from what he has seen that opponent do in the past. Any changes noted can be called to the attention of the head coach, who can decide what adjustments can be made.

If a staff is large enough, there may be two scouts assigned to scout a team for a fixed number of games. When there are two scouts working together, there must be an understanding of how they are going to divide the work. One effective way is for one to do all the writing when the team is on offense, while the other is the observer. When the team is on defense, this procedure is then reversed. How the responsibility is divided will usually depend upon the scout’s coaching responsibility and his knowledge. Some defensive coaches like to observe the offense so they can see how the team is playing in order to start thinking and planning then and there on how best to stop it. Other defensive coaches prefer to observe the defense and analyze the defenses used as the game progresses, to determine the team’s strength and weakness. Another method is to have one coach do all the writing for a quarter, with the second coach doing the observing. This procedure is then reversed at the end of that period. Individual coaches will have to decide which method is to be employed. The determining factor should be which one is felt to be the most effective as far as those coaches are concerned.

There are occasions when one man may scout a team throughout the entire schedule. This was used at Navy in 1959 and 1960, and has proven to be very successful. Captain J. P. Monahan, U.S.M.C., saw Army play every game those two seasons and had the book on them, so to speak. In the eighth and ninth games that Army played, other scouts were assigned to work with him. Each had specific assignments to carry out, such as watching certain individuals, both offensively and defensively. The scouts were used to check on various things on which Captain Monahan wanted more information.

Another method is the one used at the Naval Academy against all opponents except Army. One scout is assigned to follow an opponent for at least two weeks, if the schedule permits. All the information from those games is compiled and presented to the head scout for study and background information. The head scout then observes that team the week prior to its game with Navy. This has the advantage of the same scout’s presenting the head coach, the staff, and the squad with the same basic type of report for every opponent. One reason for its use at the Naval Academy is the great turnover of scouting personnel, since many of the coaches used in scouting are military personnel assigned to duty there. At the completion of their duty, they are replaced by other officers who will be used as scouts along with their primary duties. This is a method which can be used by any staff that may include some inexperienced scouts.

A variation of this method is to have two, or possibly three, scouts assigned to watch only the game played the week prior to their game with that opponent. No other game played by that team is personally scouted by a member of the staff, providing the game to be scouted is against a major opponent using an offense from which a true defensive picture can be obtained. If that week the opponent is playing a breather or a team whose offense is very different, then some other game on the schedule is chosen to be scouted by members of the staff. When this method is used, however, prior arrangements should be made to obtain films of the games not scouted, either by direct exchange, or from the previous opponents. These films should be available early in the week of the game for study by the other members of the staff. The information obtained from these films is then added to that gained from the game scouted. If and when movies are obtained of the game scouted, they can be closely scrutinized to see if anything went unobserved or unnoted by the scouts.

Often conferences will have restrictions as to the number of times a team may be scouted. Some will limit a team to three looks, which means one man can see a team three times, or one man can see them once and the following week two men can scout them, or three men can see them in one game. There are some conferences that limit a team to two looks, while other conferences restrict the scouting to one game, but two scouts may be present. However, usually when there are restrictions as to the number of times that a team may