Treacherous Play
()
About this ebook
Deception and betrayal in gameplay are generally considered off-limits, designed out of most multiplayer games. There are a few games, however, in which deception and betrayal are allowed, and even encouraged. In Treacherous Play, Marcus Carter explores the ethics and experience of playing such games, offering detailed explorations of three games in which this kind of “dark play” is both lawful and advantageous: EVE Online, DayZ, and the television series Survivor. Examining aspects of games that are often hidden, ignored, or designed away, Carter shows the appeal of playing treacherously.
Carter looks at EVE Online’s notorious scammers and spies, drawing on his own extensive studies of them, and describes how treacherous play makes EVE successful. Making a distinction between treacherous play and griefing or trolling, he examines the experiences of DayZ players to show how negative experiences can be positive in games, and a core part of their appeal. And he explains how in Survivor’s tribal council votes, a player’s acts of betrayal can exact a cost. Then, considering these games in terms of their design, he discusses how to design for treacherous play.
Carter’s account challenges the common assumptions that treacherous play is unethical, antisocial, and engaged in by bad people. He doesn’t claim that more games should feature treachery, but that examining this kind of play sheds new light on what play can be.
Related to Treacherous Play
Related ebooks
Ludopolitics: Videogames against Control Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDigital Playgrounds: Our Kids & Video Games Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGames are not: The difficult and definitive guide to what video games are Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGambling Games: Casino Games Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQueerness in Play Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Human Behind the Controller: A Look Into the World of Competitive Smash Bros. and Esports Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSimulating Good and Evil: The Morality and Politics of Videogames Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Counterfeit Coin: Videogames and Fantasies of Empowerment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperimental Games: Critique, Play, and Design in the Age of Gamification Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGaming Guide: Gambling in Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Best Non-Violent Video Games Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroducing Game Theory: A Graphic Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of the Stealth Game: From Metal Gear to Splinter Cell and Everything in Between Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe 'Ology' of G.A.M.E. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGame Changer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of The Infinite Game: by Simon Sinek - A Comprehensive Summary Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Risk: The Book Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ultimate RPG Gameplay Guide: Role-Play the Best Campaign Ever—No Matter the Game! Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Random Battles: A Gamer’s Guide to What the Crap is Happening in the Games Industry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGame Play™ Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Well Played 2.0: Games, Value and Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBioShock: Decision, Forced Choice and Propaganda Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5God, Games and My Neighbour: Loving My Neighbour Through Entertainment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBFS Journal #24 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA LUDIC SOCIETY Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJourneys: Core Rulebook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Gamer's Bucket List: The 50 Video Games to Play Before You Die Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Seven Games of Life: And How to Play Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrictionless: Build Better Video Games, Attract and Retain Players, Grow Revenue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNewbies Guide to Diplomacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Video Games For You
Live to Tell the Tale: Combat Tactics for Player Characters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5NES Classic: The Ultimate Guide to The Legend Of Zelda Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Monsters Know What They're Doing: Combat Tactics for Dungeon Masters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Big Book of Zelda: The Unofficial Guide to Breath of the Wild and The Legend of Zelda Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quest for the Golden Apple: An Unofficial Graphic Novel for Minecrafters Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Think Like A Game Designer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The SNES Encyclopedia: Every Game Released for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dark Souls : Beyond the Grave - Volume 1: Demons Souls - Dark Souls - Dark Souls II Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ultimate Guide to The Legend of Zelda A Link to the Past Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings101 Awesome Builds: Minecraft® Secrets from the World's Greatest Crafters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sega Mega Drive & Genesis Encyclopedia: Every Game Released for Sega's 16-bit Console Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Legendary World of Zelda Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultimate Guide to Mastering Command Blocks!: Minecraft Keys to Unlocking Secret Commands Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5World of Warcraft: The Official Cookbook Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fallout: A Tale of Mutation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pojo's Unofficial Advanced Pokemon Go: The Best Tips and Strategies for the World's Hottest Game! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Master Builder Roblox: The Essential Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Calling the Makers: an Unofficial History of Dune Games Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Gamer's Bucket List: The 50 Video Games to Play Before You Die Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Super World of Mario: The Ultimate Unofficial Guide to Super Mario® Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fortnite Guide to Staying Alive: Tips and Tricks for Every Kind of Player Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Big Book of Fortnite: The Deluxe Unofficial Guide to Battle Royale Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pojo's Unofficial Ultimate Guide to Pokemon GO: How to Catch 'Em All! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Narrative Design for Indies: Getting Started Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pojo's Unofficial Big Book of Pokemon Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for Treacherous Play
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Treacherous Play - Marcus Carter
Treacherous Play
Playful Thinking
Jesper Juul, Geoffrey Long, William Uricchio, and Mia Consalvo, editors
The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games, Jesper Juul, 2013
Uncertainty in Games, Greg Costikyan, 2013
Play Matters, Miguel Sicart, 2014
Works of Game: On the Aesthetics of Games and Art, John Sharp, 2015
How Games Move Us: Emotion by Design, Katherine Isbister, 2016
Playing Smart: On Games, Intelligence, and Artificial Intelligence, Julian Togelius, 2018
Fun, Taste, & Games: An Aesthetics of the Idle, Unproductive, and Otherwise Playful, John Sharp and David Thomas, 2019
Real Games: What’s Legitimate and What’s Not in Contemporary Video Games, Mia Consalvo and Christopher A. Paul, 2019
Achievement Relocked: Loss Aversion and Game Design, Geoffrey Engelstein, 2020
Play Like a Feminist, Shira Chess, 2020
Ambient Play, Larissa Hjorth and Ingrid Richardson, 2020
Making Games: The Politics and Poetics of Game Creation Tools, Stefan Werning, 2021
Treacherous Play, Marcus Carter, 2022
Treacherous Play
Marcus Carter
The MIT Press
Cambridge, Massachusetts
London, England
© 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher.
The MIT Press would like to thank the anonymous peer reviewers who provided comments on drafts of this book. The generous work of academic experts is essential for establishing the authority and quality of our publications. We acknowledge with gratitude the contributions of these otherwise uncredited readers.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Carter, Marcus, author.
Title: Treacherous play / Marcus Carter.
Description: Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press, 2022. | Series: Playful thinking | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2021000494 | ISBN 9780262046312 (hardcover)
Subjects: LCSH: Games--Psychological aspects. | Deception.
Classification: LCC GV1201.37 .C37 2022 | DDC 790.1--dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021000494
d_r0
Contents
On Thinking Playfully
1 An Introduction to Playing Treacherously
2 EVE Online: Don’t Trust Anyone!
3 DayZ: Treachery in the Zombie Apocalypse
4 Survivor: Treacherous Play as a Spectator Sport
5 Designing Treacherous Play
6 Treacherous Assumptions
Appendix
Acknowledgments
Notes
Bibliography
Index
On Thinking Playfully
Many people (we series editors included) find video games exhilarating, but it can be just as interesting to ponder why that is so. What do video games do? What can they be used for? How do they work? How do they relate to the rest of the world? Why is play both so important and so powerful?
Playful Thinking is a series of short, readable, and argumentative books that share some playfulness and excitement with the games that they are about. Each book in the series is small enough to fit in a backpack or coat pocket, and combines depth with readability for any reader interested in playing more thoughtfully or thinking more playfully. This includes, but is by no means limited to, academics, game makers, and curious players.
So, we are casting our net wide. Each book in our series provides a blend of new insights and interesting arguments with overviews of knowledge from game studies and other areas. You will see this reflected not just in the range of titles in our series, but in the range of authors creating them. Our basic assumption is simple: video games are such a flourishing medium that any new perspective on them is likely to show us something unseen or forgotten, including those from such unconventional voices as artists, philosophers, or specialists in other industries or fields of study. These books are bridge builders, cross-pollinating both areas with new knowledge and new ways of thinking.
At its heart, this is what Playful Thinking is all about: new ways of thinking about games and new ways of using games to think about the rest of the world.
Jesper Juul
Geoffrey Long
William Uricchio
Mia Consalvo
1 An Introduction to Playing Treacherously
Games that are deliberately designed to enable or invite betrayal are extremely rare.
If you steal from your guild in World of Warcraft, the game’s moderators will return the stolen goods and suspend your account. Most first-person shooter (FPS) games code away the killing of teammates by disabling friendly fire
and structuring the competition in such a way that betraying your team would offer no in-game reward. In most tabletop games, where these types of coded rules aren’t possible, trust is implicit.¹ The rules of Monopoly don’t need to say that you must not lie or steal from other players, because deception and betrayal are just assumed to be an illegitimate way of playing the game. Playing treacherously is typically treated as an off-limits
type of play that will ruin the experience of other players and is actively designed against in most multiplayer games.
Indeed, the games scholar Staffan Björk categorizes some games with deception and betrayal as examples of feel-bad games
for the unusually negative emotions they provoke in players.² Björk’s example is So Long Sucker, a simple bargaining game designed in the 1950s by the game theorists Mel Hausner, John Forbes Nash (Nobel Prize–winning economist of A Beautiful Mind fame), Lloyd Shapely, and Martin Shubik. Negotiation and agreements are key to winning So Long Sucker, but just as in TV’s Survivor, betrayal is also an implicit necessity for having a chance of winning. Such was the intense emotional experience of playing that Nash nicknamed the game fuck your buddy,
³ and Shubik later recalled married couples going home in separate cabs
after playing.⁴ I have included the rules for So Long Sucker in the appendix at the end of the book, if you want to test this reputation for yourself.
But why? Of all the things that seem totally appropriate to do in games, why is treacherous play so polarizing? Why is the emotional experience so exceptional?
In this book, I explore an underexplored type of play that sits on the border of what is commonly understood to be acceptable or appropriate to do in a game. It is a type of play that is not for everyone. Through case studies of games that explicitly permit betrayal, I illuminate and complicate some assumptions that scholars, designers, and players often make about the limits of competition in multiplayer games; the appeal of negative experiences; how social interactions can be a part of play; and how we draw the lines between who you are in a game, and who you are in real life. To borrow an argument from Jaakko Stenros, transgressive play is still play, and if we only look at half the picture, we cannot grasp the whole phenomenon and its nuances.
⁵
Here I focus specifically on the few examples of where treacherous play is successful. By this, I mean where it occurs within the rules of the game, and where the presence of treachery has undeniably contributed to a game’s appeal and success. This includes play like yelling Friendly! Don’t shoot!
when you encounter another player in DayZ, but burying an ax in their head when they turn around; promising another player in Survivor that you will take them to the final three, but then writing their name down at the next tribal council; and being a productive member of an EVE Online corporation while selling military secrets to its enemies. Some of the cases in this book are provocative, but they help uncover aspects of play that often get hidden, ignored, or designed away.
By looking at this other half of the picture, we can start to imagine more about what the possibilities are for this emerging medium.
Treacherous Assumptions
There are three assumptions I often see players and scholars making about treacherous play: gut reactions to the idea of betraying for fun. The purpose of this book is not to dispel these assumptions but to use them to develop a deeper understanding about treacherous play and uncover what it can contribute to how we think about games and play more broadly.
Assumption 1: Treacherous Play Is Unethical
The first assumption that I find people make about treacherous play is that using deception and betrayal for in-game advantage in a multiplayer game is—for some reason—unethical. To discuss this idea, we must first consider how competition in a game can be ethical at all.
C. Thi Nguyen, a philosopher, and José Zagal, a games scholar, have discussed the ethics of competition in multiplayer games, and what it means for a competitive game to be moral. Their starting point is to acknowledge that direct competition in games does involve a form of violence against an opponent, albeit in a highly abstracted form. In a strict Kantian sense, this means that all forms of competition are morally wrong,⁶ but as Nguyen and Zagal argue, some forms of competition seem clearly ethical.
⁷ They volunteer the term mere violence
to describe and distinguish the forms of violence that are not significant,
where such forms are limited in significance to preventing an opponent’s in-game plans, by the means permitted by the rules.
The standard view in the philosophy of sport is that the two key principles of consent and agreement make competition ethical,⁸ but Nguyen and Zagal usefully extend this rubric through Bernard Suit’s principle of the lusory goal: the in-game goal we establish that is contingent on a series of unnecessary obstacles.⁹ More than just consent, the struggle against these obstacles is what we desire from competitive games. If my only goal was to beat you at poker, I might use a stacked deck to ensure that I win, circumventing those unnecessary obstacles. Here, though, I would no longer just be committing mere violence against your goal of winning but committing violence against your lusory goal and the unnecessary obstacles it is contingent on. For Nguyen and Zagal, the ethics of the transformation of the violence of competition in multiplayer games is contingent on the way the game’s design aligns my mere violence with your desire for struggle.
¹⁰
Consider Fortnite, a battle royale first-person shooter game where up to one hundred players compete to survive on a virtual island. Play is characterized by a few one-on-one battles as players are forced into a smaller and smaller zone with the lusory goal (and the way to win Fortnite) of being the last player standing, having overcome the obstacles that the other ninety-nine players represent. To kill me in Fortnite is to deny me the opportunity to win (an act of mere violence
), but attempting to kill me is necessary for my lusory goal. To play Fortnite on a private server with no opponents is not to play Fortnite at all.
This is a useful lens to start interrogating treacherous play, because it helps us understand how betrayal is unethical in most games. Players who steal from a rival guild in World of Warcraft are not aligning their violence with their opponents’ desire for struggle, since trusting correctly is not an unnecessary obstacle World of Warcraft. This is