This works. Or atleast the classical concept that we seen before, as in "Jumanji". But this time with a "horror" twist to it and it does not makes it any better.

Not often i watch French films, so I didnt know what to expect at all. I was intrigued by this since the first teaser trailer and i saw Jean Reno was in it, one of my favourite actors and that this really fits for the October days.

This feels really bad at some moments, abit silly sometimes, but it also manages to be abit more entertaining in periods. It's definitely a family movie that works on a friday evening, but not more then that. We have seen this concept before and the manuscript is really bad, nothing new or unique at all.

Jean Reno does a good performance, but the other actors are abit worse.

You can definitely watch this with your family on a weekend, but dont really expect too much from it.

Thats what it felt like, atleast to an extent but it has to be said the mentioned film is much better than this. Though from what ive seen its only the second time a concept like this has been done so its still a fresh idea and now netflix have helmed this new french movie, with jean reno whos a pleasure to see but I don't understand why he was dubbed. A family sit down to play a game for family game night and as is tradition they play the game called wolf I think. Everyone ends up not playing it but the father while putting the pieces away awakens something and before they know it they are swept off into the game and stuck in the middle ages with a frightful king and the threat of wolfes each night. An overall good movie but not without it faults. Acting was alright and it did have parts that made me laugh.

In fact it is a funny movie that you don't have to take everything seriously. It is just an adventure fantasy thriller for family that brings you back in the middle age. The sceneries therefore were done really great. All the actors contributed a top performance to create this story believable to the audience.

Watch it on a Saturday or Sunday evening when you don't have anything else to do and you will see how you will relax and have a good time. If you like this genre of film so check out Le Pacte des Loups with Vincent Cassell and Monica Bellucci.

For all these reasons my wife and me rate it 6/10.

Family Pack attempts a modern, quirky spin on a medieval adventure, but sadly, it misses the mark on nearly every front. The acting is shockingly poor, with the cast delivering lines so awkwardly and out of place that you wonder if they're trying to parody themselves. Their attempts at humor fall flat, making several scenes almost painful to watch as they fumble through punchlines with zero finesse.

The plot feels like a weak knock-off of Jumanji, though without any of the charm or coherence. Scenes unfold with no clear direction, bouncing aimlessly from one setup to the next. Even more puzzling is the random appearance of Leonardo da Vinci, who seems to be there purely to tick a box rather than to add anything meaningful to the story.

Adding to the confusion are clumsy, heavy-handed attempts to push social messages about race and gender roles in the Middle Ages. These themes feel forced, overly simplistic, and ultimately ineffective, dragging the movie down even further. All in all, Family Pack is a chaotic mix of bad writing, poor acting, and misguided social commentary, and unfortunately, it's not even entertaining in a "so bad it's good" way.

Family Pack is a film most delightful, balancing simplicity with a spirited charm that warms the heart. It may not dazzle with a plot of intricate depth nor boast grand cinematic achievements, yet therein lies its unique allure. The film embraces its modest presentation, favouring practical effects that bring to life its whimsical elements, in a manner reminiscent of days when visual splendour required genuine artistry rather than reliance upon modern devices. Such choices impart a nostalgic comfort, reminiscent of family gatherings round the hearth.

While the picture may not be regarded as a pinnacle of the cinematic arts, its light-hearted humour and warmth make it a jovial companion for an evening of familial bonding. It is a gentle adventure, unsullied by grand pretensions, and aimed squarely at delivering mirth and pleasant company. A modest triumph, indeed, for those who seek joy in simplicity and find solace in a narrative that refuses to overreach its genial intentions.

This movie was literally garbage! It is Certainly not a family movie.

The story logic is literally at a grade 2 level yet it is inappropriate for kids.

It has many plot holes and many questions are not answered. Many characters are a certain way without any explanation.

The special effects are mediocre. Reminds you of cheap 80's tv series. You can literally see the green screen reflection off some characters.

Throughout the movie you'll be lectured... including about feminism, guys liking guys, kids being confused About their gender and men being weak, and women being better than men.

Don't waste your time on this!

Not the best acting, and the special effects budget was obviously low, and yet this was a fun watch throughout. Definitely better than I expected, although I turned on subtitles to augment the dubbed soundtrack.

Lots of slapstick and pantomime type humour so plenty to amuse younger viewers. If you can ignore timetravel plot holes then this is a fun family film that is enjoyable enough.

I watched again in French with English subtitles and its definitely more exciting with the original voices. Some characters weren't fully developed which is a shame. It was nice to see the younger characters forming a relationship with their grandfather, freed from his dementia, and able to play a vital role in the drama.

It was supposed to be an awesome movie. The premise is great. It's very catchy from the start, it really holds you into the story, and you begin to identify with all the characters.

However, around 40 minutes inside the movie, the first MESSAGE is thrown into you.

Since the movie is great, then you just ignore it (as always) and just keep going. However, you already start thinking "why did they have to do this". But ok, keep going.

Then, around 10 minutes later another MESSAGE is thrown in, without any need at all.

At this point you kind of already know that unfortunately will be the rest of the movie like.

I kept watching for another 5 min, until the third MESSAGE was thrown in. That's when I just stopped the movie. It was enough.

Another great idea killed by THE MESSAGE.

Graded as 3, because the original premise was great.

I didnt expcept much from this movie but i was positively surprised. The Characters, though a little sterotipical, are very likeable. What sticks out for me is the big amount of practical effects, and for Movies nowadays that is not the norm. The Werewolves are played by Stuntman in suits and for me personally this is a big plus point, because i dislike it when such things are done only by computer. The same is for the sets. The colorgrading also sticks out the me because it really suits this Fantasy setting. The Comedy is realy on point and the many referances to modern times and people i found very pleasurable. Jean Reno played realy fine and his Story was very touching too. If you like the Game you should definetly give this a watch and if only for some light entertainment.

This is the worst movie i watched this year. I exspected a thrilling movie with some good plot twists but there was not a single one. An other fact is that this film does wrong is, that its trying to be funny I think I laughed 1 time. I think it's more intended for younger people, but for middle age watchers this movie is not exciting at all. Nearlly ever action in this film is predictable, you dont even have a chance to guess who the werewolfs are.

A fact that i dont know is how the rols work in france but nearlly every ability was wrong except the witch and werewolfs.

So If you exspect a exciting thriller movie, please dont watch it.

I am giving 10/10, not because it is a master piece or potential to be a cult-classic. I am giving 10/10 because it entertains without being too complicated or trying to change the society which most of today's movies do. It just entertains n that's what the idea of movies.

As you might have guessed from all the reviews, it is French Jumanji. N it is. A family of 6, a board game takes them to a different world, finish the game and come home.

It has got time travel, witches and wizards, werewolves, stereotypes, gay character, feminism. Each of them is explosive ingredient. A touch more and the whole film blows. True for many many movies these days. The writers of this movie added in the right amount and voila.. A fun movie which u can enjoy.

Must watch if you are feeling lazy on Sunday afternoon n want netflix to take care of it.

PS: an inconspicuous Italian character was a nice touch. Kudos to writers..

It's a well-intentioned family comedy in which the characters are pulled into the tabletop Werewolf game a la Jumanji. The tone is affable and the cast is good but the overall production is uneven. The humor lands about half the time, and when it does it's funny; but other attempts come across as cringe and forced. The premise of the Werewolf game - the players must identify and dispatch those who are secretly werewolves, while the werewolves try to divert blame to the innocent through deception and recrimination - is treated more or less as an afterthought. Potential suspects aren't investigated or built up so there are no real stakes or conflicts in trying to uncover the culprit(s) and the conclusory reveal is meh.

Family Pack is a film that falls short on multiple fronts, making it a rather disappointing experience. The plot, which centers around a dysfunctional family trying to navigate their differences, is cliché and lacks originality. The script is riddled with predictable moments and uninspired dialogue, failing to deliver any meaningful or memorable lines.

The acting, unfortunately, does little to salvage the film. The performances feel forced and lack the emotional depth needed to make the characters relatable or engaging. Even seasoned actors seem to struggle with the poorly written material, resulting in a series of lackluster portrayals that fail to resonate with the audience. Not the worst movie I've seen, but definitely not in depth of what expected like I tell most people give it a watch and be the one to judge for yourself cause you may never know you might enjoy it more than others.

...but IMDB doesn't allow users to award half-stars.

Anyway, the premise is nothing new but done rather well; acting is not stellar but more than adequate (it's clear that the actors were having some fun while shooting this movie, and this is always a plus).

Some unbelievable aspects of the plot (such as the latex paint or the electric amplifier) can be explained as "they are inside a game, and not actually in the sixteenth century" so they don't ruin suspension of disbelief.

I've never played the board game The Werewolves of Millers Hollow so I didn't really know what to expect. Seeing a senile Jean Reno turn into a superpowered fighter was a nice touch.

Recommended as a family movie; the werewolves aren't too scary for children, and some of the jokes are actually funny.

Watching this French movie was such a waste of time!

At first, I thought it was a remake or copy of the very successful 1993 French movie "Les Visiteurs" (The Visitors), one of the most popular and best at the box office in France. Jean Reno was also the lead actor in 'The Visitors."

I understand now it was about the werewolves game "Les Loups-garous de Thiercelieux", which I'm sure not many are familiar with.

Bottom line. It's a stupid silly movie that does not make much sense. The poor performance and overacting of the actors (who are not credible) do not help.

Quite confusing to watch.

It's a turkey!

A French turkey. Lol.

Family Pack is an unexpected oddity that combines a mix of 60s-70s story tropes with a 2024 release, leaving viewers scratching their heads yet strangely entertained. The plot follows a family - a mom, dad, three children, and a granddad - who somehow acquire powers through a game and end up trapped inside it, forced to fight werewolves to escape.

Despite the lackluster storyline, subpar VFX, and exaggerated acting from the cast, there's a certain allure in its unabashedly outdated premise. The film doesn't aim for realism or modern finesse but rather indulges in a kind of absurdity that's oddly charming. The overacting and the obvious budgetary constraints somehow work in its favor, making viewers stay hooked, if only to see how far it goes. By the end, it's hard not to wonder, What did I just watch? Yet, it's this exact blend of ridiculousness and nostalgia that makes Family Pack strangely memorable - even if, objectively, it's a "pathetic" piece of cinema.

Major plot holes, convoluted storyline, bad acting, filled with cheap, unintelligent jokes, is there anything good to say about this film? Is it this bad because most of their budget went to paying Jean Reno? The continuity is awful, you can tell they put basically no research into the actual 1400s, or even the Werewolves game itself. How are the creators this bad at understanding the game they literally made a film of? There is genuinely nothing good to say about this film. I can't even root for the characters because they all act like idiotic, headless chickens for the entire duration of the film. Don't waste your time, just rewatch the 1995 Jumanji.

Loveeeed it.

Based on the card game Les Loups-garous de Thiercelieux, this movie hit all the right notes.

The game is frankly a huge success, a lot of people used to play it and still play it!

If you're not familiar with this game I invite you to check the rules of the game and get yourself familiarized with the caracters in this game.

FYI: based on the card picked out at the start of the game, you become a caracter for the game. The classic caracters are the werewolves, witch, clairvoyant, little girl, Cupidon, hunter, thief and the villagers who don't have any power. Werewolves eliminate a caracter each night, and when morning comes, the village of Thiercelieux needs to vote on eliminating someone they think is the werewolf.

Game is won when all werewolves are eliminated (beware of the lovers) In the more recent game, they added so many caracters! Really fun to play, so I invite you to play the game and go check out this movie ;)

Franck Dubosc, Jean Reno excel as usual.

Really recommend it, was funny and had the right dose of everything and really respected the rules of the original game which I loved.

I recently had the opportunity to watch a film that had garnered quite a bit of buzz prior to its release. With its intriguing premise and promising cast, my expectations were understandably high. However, after sitting through the entirety of the movie, I was left feeling disappointed. While I had hoped for a compelling narrative, strong character development, and a satisfying conclusion, what I encountered fell short on multiple fronts.

First and foremost, the pacing of the story was frustratingly slow. In an age where audiences are accustomed to fast-paced narratives that keep them engaged, this film took its time, often dragging through scenes that could have been tightened or even eliminated entirely. The first act felt like it stretched on forever, with little to no substantial character or plot development. I found myself checking the time, wondering when the story would pick up and deliver the excitement promised in the trailer. Unfortunately, the slow pacing did nothing but amplify my growing sense of impatience and disillusionment.

The film's characters, who were purportedly educated and intelligent, also fell short of my expectations. In theory, these characters should have been relatable and engaging, but in execution, they often came off as superficial and one-dimensional. Instead of showcasing the depth and complexity that one would expect from individuals with power and influence, their decisions felt inconsistent and often illogical. The screenplay missed the opportunity to delve into their backgrounds or motivations, leaving them feeling more like plot devices than real people. This lack of depth made it difficult to connect with them emotionally, and as the story unfolded, I found myself increasingly indifferent to their fates.

One of the most frustrating aspects of the film was the way it portrayed the characters' power. They were depicted as having significant influence, yet they consistently failed to utilize it effectively. There were numerous situations where decisive action was required, but the characters hesitated or chose paths that seemed contrary to their established personas. This inconsistency was not only bewildering but also detracted from the overall tension and stakes of the narrative. Instead of feeling like I was watching powerful individuals navigate complex challenges, it felt more like a missed opportunity to explore the dynamics of power and responsibility.

Moreover, the film seemed to hint at deeper themes related to ambition, morality, and the consequences of power, but it never fully explored these ideas. Instead of crafting a thoughtful commentary, the story meandered without a clear direction, ultimately leaving these themes unresolved. I expected the film to engage with these concepts in a meaningful way, but instead, it opted for a surface-level treatment that felt unfulfilling.

The cinematography and soundtrack, while technically proficient, could not save the film from its narrative shortcomings. A visually stunning film can enhance a weak story, but in this case, it only served to highlight the disconnect between what was being shown and the lack of substance beneath it. The film was filled with beautiful imagery, yet it felt hollow, as if the aesthetics were a distraction from the flawed storytelling.

In conclusion, the film did not meet my expectations in several critical areas. The slow pacing hindered engagement, the characters lacked the intelligence and depth that their backgrounds suggested, and their power was poorly utilized. While there were moments of potential, they were overshadowed by a lack of coherent direction and meaningful character development. Ultimately, I walked away feeling that this film was a missed opportunity-a story that could have been compelling but instead left me wanting more. If you're looking for a gripping narrative and well-rounded characters, this film might not be the best choice.

Loups-Garous had the potential to be an interesting film, but overall, it falls squarely into mediocre territory. The idea behind the movie-a future dystopia where werewolves exist-was actually kind of cool, but the execution feels more like a B-movie, lacking the polish needed to fully bring this concept to life.

The film reminded me a lot of Jumanji, especially in the way the characters are thrust into a dangerous, game-like situation, but with a noticeably lower budget. Unfortunately, this really shows in the production quality and special effects, which fail to impress.

While the movie had moments of fun, it was ultimately weighed down by its PG rating, which seemed to water down the potential tension and action. A more mature approach could have added some much-needed grit to the story, but instead, it plays it safe and ends up feeling a bit too tame for its own good.

In the end, Loups-Garous is entertaining enough for a casual watch, but it doesn't leave a lasting impression. It's a decent time-killer, but don't expect anything groundbreaking.

What an odd little movie that is full of propaganda and feminism. I was first disappointed with Jean Reno having such an insignificant part while being dubbed by someone else. They should have used his own voice. But his part did improve to an enjoyable character. Franck Dubosc and Suzanne Clement's part were a bit hard to accept. If you want to get rid of a feminist send them back in time was the conclusion of that pair.

Despite the force feeding of propaganda it does have some good moments. There were even 2 or 3 touching moments. It could have been so much better had they stayed aligned with the plot.

Franck Dubosc... I think I need to remember to avoid this actor in the future, because even though I enjoyed bits of this film, it's not much better than Cat & Dog. Franck Dubosc plays a Dad named Jerome who tries to get his family together to play a game called Wolf pack, but they don't want to. As Jerome packs up the game he accidentally teleports the family into the game world where it's the middle ages and a vicious king rules the day and werewolves rule the night. And the only way to get back is to kill all the werewolves.

Like Cat & Dog I don't think this film knew whether it wanted to be a kids or an adult film. For example it's not quite violent enough to be an adult film, because you only really get to see one werewolf fight at the end. But when you do see the werewolves it makes the film a bit too scary to be a kids film.

There is some other action that isn't based around the werewolves for example towards the end of the film Franck's wife, Marie (Suzanne Clement) is arrested and thrown in prison because the other people from the middle ages think she is a witch. This part was quite exciting and does lead to a joke that at first made me laugh but by the end of the film it seemed a bit repetitive and silly. I also think this joke would have seemed more gross than funny to young kids.

The other jokes in this film are based around the fact that Jerome and Marie both had a child from their first marriage and then they also had a child together which seems completely out of the ordinary in the middle ages. And there are also some jokes based around how women and mixed race people were treated in the middle ages. These jokes made me a chuckle a little, but again a young viewer would probably have completely misunderstood them.

So are Franck and his family able to save Marie and teleport themselves back to their own world? Well if you still want to find that out after reading my hit and miss review and you have teenage kids, I encourage you to give this film a try and who knows you might enjoy it a bit more than I did.

Granted, this is no Jumanji, however I did not feel at any point it was a waste of my time. I do not care for dubbing no matter the storyline or movie budget, so that lowered my score, but very minimally. However, the storyline was not built up as well as I think it could have been, and likely noone will Ooh and/or Aah over the effects, but I think they made good use of beautiful surroundings. Someone's review mentioned a 'Message', but apparently I missed that 3 times over. Another review(s) reference the actual game, and I think knowing of or having had played the game would add to the enjoyment (and my score). Regardless, this was a fun, light, occasionally silly, vaguely frightening in a notveryfrightening way adventure, and I recommend it! =)