TY - JOUR
AU - Zadushlivy, Nina
AU - Biviji, Rizwana
AU - Williams, Karmen S
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/3/5
TI - Exploration of Reproductive Health Apps’ Data Privacy Policies and the Risks Posed to Users: Qualitative Content Analysis
JO - J Med Internet Res
SP - e51517
VL - 27
KW - data privacy policy
KW - reproductive health apps
KW - Transparency, Health Content, Excellent Technical Content, Security/Privacy, Usability, Subjective
KW - THESIS
KW - THESIS evaluation
KW - women’s health
KW - menstrual health
KW - mobile health
KW - mHealth
KW - menstruating persons’ health
KW - mobile phone
AB - Background: Mobile health apps often require the collection of identifiable information. Subsequently, this places users at significant risk of privacy breaches when the data are misused or not adequately stored and secured. These issues are especially concerning for users of reproductive health apps in the United States as protection of sensitive user information is affected by shifting governmental regulations such as the overruling of Roe v Wade and varying state-level abortion laws. Limited studies have analyzed the data privacy policies of these apps and considered the safety issues associated with a lack of user transparency and protection. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate popular reproductive health apps, assess their individual privacy policies, analyze federal and state data privacy laws governing these apps in the United States and the European Union (EU), and recommend best practices for users and app developers to ensure user data safety. Methods: In total, 4 popular reproductive health apps—Clue, Flo, Period Tracker by GP Apps, and Stardust—as identified from multiple web sources were selected through convenience sampling. This selection ensured equal representation of apps based in the United States and the EU, facilitating a comparative analysis of data safety practices under differing privacy laws. A qualitative content analysis of the apps and a review of the literature on data use policies, governmental data privacy regulations, and best practices for mobile app data privacy were conducted between January 2023 and July 2023. The apps were downloaded and systematically evaluated using the Transparency, Health Content, Excellent Technical Content, Security/Privacy, Usability, Subjective (THESIS) evaluation tool to assess their privacy and security practices. Results: The overall privacy and security scores for the EU-based apps, Clue and Flo, were both 3.5 of 5. In contrast, the US-based apps, Period Tracker by GP Apps and Stardust, received scores of 2 and 4.5, respectively. Major concerns regarding privacy and data security primarily involved the apps’ use of IP address tracking and the involvement of third parties for advertising and marketing purposes, as well as the potential misuse of data. Conclusions: Currently, user expectations for data privacy in reproductive health apps are not being met. Despite stricter privacy policies, particularly with state-specific adaptations, apps must be transparent about data storage and third-party sharing even if just for marketing or analytical purposes. Given the sensitivity of reproductive health data and recent state restrictions on abortion, apps should minimize data collection, exceed encryption and anonymization standards, and reduce IP address tracking to better protect users.
SN - 1438-8871
UR - https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e51517
UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/51517
UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40053713
DO - 10.2196/51517
ID - info:doi/10.2196/51517
ER -
pFad - Phonifier reborn
Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.
Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.
Alternative Proxies:
Alternative Proxy
pFad Proxy
pFad v3 Proxy
pFad v4 Proxy