Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Rethinking responses to the world’s water crises

Abstract

The world faces multiple water crises, including overextraction, flooding, ecosystem degradation and inequitable safe water access. Insufficient funding and ineffective implementation impede progress in water access, while, in part, a misdiagnosis of the causes has prioritized some responses over others (for example, hard over soft infrastructure). We reframe the responses to mitigating the world’s water crises using a ‘beyond growth’ framing and compare it to mainstream thinking. Beyond growth is systems thinking that prioritizes the most disadvantaged. It seeks to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation by overcoming policy capture and inertia and by fostering place-based and justice-principled institutional changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Too much, too little, too dirty and too stressed: annual measures from 1991 to 2021.
Fig. 2: Sankey diagram of keywords in UN reports and documents from 1972 to 2023 related to economic growth, green growth and beyond growth.
Fig. 3: The Earth system, the state of the world and a beyond growth framing.
Fig. 4: Key reports and documents, timeline of economic growth, green growth and beyond growth, and global access to safe water.
Fig. 5: Core and peripheral goals of economic growth, green growth and beyond growth.
Fig. 6: Economic growth, green growth and beyond growth: selected responses to the world’s water crises.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenwood, E. E. et al. Mapping safe drinking water use in low- and middle-income countries. Science 385, 784–790 (2024). By combining multiple datasets, this article estimates that some 4.4 billion people lack access to safe drinking water, a much greater number than estimated by the United Nations.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas, A. K. Why water is not in the international political agenda. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 35, 177–180 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbier, E. B. Review paper: water and economic growth in developed and developing countries. Water Econ. Policy 10, 2430002 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hall, N. L. et al. Safe water and sanitation in remote Indigenous communities in Australia: conditions towards sustainable outcomes. Australas. J. Water Resour. 26, 187–198 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, M. et al. A triple increase in global river basins with water scarcity due to future pollution. Nat. Commun. 15, 880 (2024). By accounting for nitrate pollution in rivers, this article estimates that water pollution increases the number of catchments facing water scarcity by 2,000.

  6. ‘Annual Water Stress’ in Aqueduct (World Resources Institute, 2023); https://www.wri.org/applications/aqueduct/water-risk-atlas/

  7. Fluet-Chouinard, E. et al. Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries. Nature 614, 281–286 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 87–101 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jasechko, S. et al. Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally. Nature 625, 715–721 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Y. et al. Future global streamflow declines are probably more severe than previously estimated. Nat. Water 1, 261–271 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trancoso, R. et al. Significantly wetter or drier future conditions for one to two thirds of the world’s population. Nat. Commun. 15, 483 (2024). Using multiple global climate models, this article finds that up to two-thirds of the world’s population could suffer from either drier or wetter conditions by 2100 under a high-emissions scenario.

  12. Towards Green Growth (OECD, 2011).

  13. Widuto, A. & Spinaci, S. From Growth to ‘Beyond Growth’: Concepts and Challenges (European Parliament, 2023); https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/747107/EPRS_BRI(2023)747107_EN.pdf

  14. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J.-P. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (Government of France, 2009).

  15. Solow, R. M. Growth Theory: An Exposition. The Radcliffe Lectures Delivered in the University of Warwick (Clarendon, 1969).

  16. Susskind, D. Growth: A Reckoning (Allen Lane, 2024).

  17. Barbier, E. B. The economics of managing water crises. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 380, 20210295 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiedmann, T. O. et al. The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6271–6276 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Allen, T. Virtual Water: Tackling the Threat to Our Planet’s Most Precious Resource (Bloomsbury, 2011).

  20. Tollefson, J. Catastrophic change looms as Earth nears climate ‘tipping points’, report says. Nature 624, 233–234 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. King, L. C., Savin, I. & Drews, S. Shades of green growth scepticism among climate policy researchers. Nat. Sustain. 6, 1316–1320 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barbier, E. B. Greening the post-pandemic recovery in the G20. Environ. Resour. Econ. 76, 685–703 (2020).

  23. Daly, H. E. On economics as a life science. J. Polit. Econ. 76, 392–406 (1968). One of the first published articles to connect economic systems to biophysical systems and ecology while highlighting the need, eventually, for a steady-state economy.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Galbraith, J. The Affluent Society (Houghton Mifflin, 1958). One of the first popular critiques of the negative consequences of economic growth, including environmental degradation, and the need to prioritize the provision of public goods to improve human welfare.

  25. Rammelt, C. F. et al. Impacts of meeting minimum access on critical Earth systems amidst the Great Inequality. Nat. Sustain. 6, 212–221 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Beyond Growth: Towards a New Economic Approach (OECD, 2019). On the basis of findings from an interdisciplinary advisory panel, this report presents a ‘new growth narrative’ that prioritizes economic sustainability, rising well-being, falling inequality and system resilience.

  27. Costanza, R. To build a better world, stop chasing economic growth. Nature 624, 519–521 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ansell, B. Why Politics Fails (Penguin Books, 2023).

  29. Young, O. R. On Environmental Governance: Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013); https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633176

  30. Stigler, G. J. The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econ. Manage. Sci. 2, 3–21 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Olson, M. The Rise and Decline of Nations (Yale Univ. Press, 1982).

  32. Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Matthews, K. Independent Investigation into NSW Water Management and Compliance Advice on Implementation (NSW Government, 2017).

  34. Hall, J. & Borgomeo, E. Risk-based principles for defining and managing water security. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20120407 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hope, R. et al. Science–practitioner partnerships for sustainable development. Nat. Water 2, 502–504 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Manero, A. et al. Benefits, costs and enabling conditions to achieve ‘water for all’ in rural and remote Australia. Nat. Water 2, 31–40 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Saleth, R. M. & Dinar, A. The Institutional Economics of Water: A Cross-Country Analysis of Institutions and Performance (Edward Elgar, 2004).

  38. UNESCO & UNESCO i-WSSM Water Security and the Sustainable Development Goals: Global Water Security Issues (GWSI) Series (UNESCO, 2019).

  39. Hope, R., Thomson, P., Koehler, J. & Foster, T. Rethinking the economics of rural water in Africa. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 36, 171–190 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-Based Solutions for Water (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2018).

  41. Stern, D. I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32, 1419–1439 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Durmaz, N. & Thompson, A. An environmental Kuznets curve for water pollution: does water abundance affect the turning point? Sci. Total Environ. 913, 169657 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu, H. & Brouwer, R. What is the future of water quality trading? Contemp. Econ. Policy 41, 194–217 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Brouwer, R., Tesfaye, A. & Pauw, P. Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services. Environ. Conserv. 38, 380–392 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Olmstead, S. & Zheng, J. Water pollution control in developing countries: policy instruments and empirical evidence. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 15, 261–280 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Andres, L. A. et al. Doing More with Less: Smarter Subsidies for Water Supply and Sanitation (World Bank, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1596/32277

  47. Wheeler, S. A. in Water Markets: A Global Assessment (ed. Wheeler, S. A.) 235–251 (Edward Elgar, 2021).

  48. Matthews, V. et al. Justice, culture, and relationships: Australian indigenous prescription for planetary health. Science 381, 636–641 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wheeler, S. A., Carmody, E., Grafton, R. Q., Kingsford, R. T. & Zuo, A. The rebound effect on water extraction from subsidising irrigation infrastructure in Australia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 159, 104755 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gupta, J. et al. Earth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries. Nat. Sustain. 6, 630–638 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. West, S., Haider, L. J., Hertz, T., Mancilla Garcia, M. & Moore, M.-L. Relational approaches to sustainability transformations: walking together in a world of many worlds. Ecosyst. People 20, 2370539 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gilens, M. & Page, B. I. Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspect. Polit. 12, 564–581 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lobbying in the 21st Century: Transparency, Integrity and Access (OECD, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1787/8b6ec100-en

  54. Loch, A. et al. Grand theft water and the calculus of compliance. Nat. Sustain. 3, 1012–1018 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Barry, M. E. & Coombes, P. J. Planning resilient water resources and communities: the need for a bottom-up systems approach. Australas. J. Water Resour. 22, 113–136 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Povitkina, M. & Bolkvadze, K. Fresh pipes with dirty water: how quality of government shapes the provision of public goods in democracies. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 58, 1191–1212 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Grafton, R. Q., Garrick, D., Manero, A. & Do, T. N. The Water Governance Reform Framework: overview and applications to Australia, Mexico, Tanzania, U.S.A and Vietnam. Water 11, 137 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (Harvard Univ. Press, 1999).

  59. Martuwarra RiverOfLife, Taylor, K. S. & Poelina, A. Living waters, Law first: Nyikina and Mangala water governance in the Kimberley, Western Australia. Australas. J. Water Resour. 25, 40–56 (2021).

  60. Macpherson, E. Can Western water law become more ‘relational’? A survey of comparative laws affecting water across Australasia and the Americas. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 53, 395–424 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Brown, J. et al. The effects of racism, social exclusion, and discrimination on achieving universal safe water and sanitation in high-income countries. Lancet Glob. Health 11, e606–e614 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lazaro, M., Bortagaray, I., Trimble, M. & Zurbriggen, C. Citizen deliberation in the context of Uruguay’s first National Water Plan. Water Policy 23, 487–502 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tortajada, C., Joshi, Y. K. & Biswas, A. K. The Singapore Water Story: Sustainable Development in an Urban City State (Routledge, 2013); https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076491

  64. Manero, A. et al. Growth and inequality at the micro scale: an empirical analysis of farm incomes within smallholder irrigation systems in Zimbabwe, Tanzania and Mozambique. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 36, S224–S245 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kauffman, C. M. & Martin, P. L. Scaling up Buen Vivir: globalizing local environmental governance from Ecuador. Glob. Environ. Polit. 14, 40–58 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Del Carpio, M. B., Alpizar, F. & Ferraro, P. J. Community-based monitoring to facilitate water management by local institutions in Costa Rica. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015177118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Implementing Nature-Based Flood Protection: Principles and Implementation Guidance (World Bank, 2017); https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/739421509427698706/pdf/Implementing-nature-based-flood-protection-principles-and-implementation-guidance.pdf

  68. Waylen, K. A., Blackstock, K. L., Marshall, K. & Juarez-Bourke, A. Navigating or adding to complexity? Exploring the role of catchment partnerships in collaborative governance. Sustain. Sci. 18, 2533–2548 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Canning, A. D. et al. Financial incentives for large-scale wetland restoration: beyond markets to common asset trusts. One Earth 4, 937–950 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Biswas, A. K. & Tortajada, C. Digitalization and hydroinformatics. River 2, 1–4 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. The Methodological Assessment Report on the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature: Summary for Policy Makers (IPBES, 2022).

  72. Young, S. L., Bethancourt, H. J., Ritter, Z. R. & Frongillo, E. A. The Individual Water Insecurity Experiences (IWISE) scale: reliability, equivalence and validity of an individual-level measure of water security. BMJ Glob. Health 6, e006460 (2021). A comprehensive analysis of the common failures in environmental governance and what can be done to improve environmental policy and outcomes.

  73. Fuentes, I., Vervoort, R. W., McPhee, J. & Rojas, L. A. R. Agricultural water accounting: complementing a governance monitoring schema with remote sensing calculations at different scales. Agric. Water Manage. 292, 108676 (2024).

  74. Grafton, R. Q. et al. Realizing resilience for decision-making. Nat. Sustain. 2, 907–913 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. AQUASTAT—FAO’s Global Information System on Water and Agriculture (FAO, 2024); https://data.apps.fao.org/aquastat/

  76. Steffen, W. et al. The emergence and evolution of Earth system science. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 54–63 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Bretherton, F. P. Earth system science and remote sensing. Proc. IEEE 73, 1118–1127 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was, in part, supported by the Hilda John Endowment of the Australian National University, the Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship Grant No. FL190100164 ‘Water Justice: Indigenous Water Valuation and Resilient Decision-Making’ and the REACH programme, funded by UK Aid from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office for the benefit of developing countries (programme code no. 201880).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.Q.G. is senior author. The nine co-lead authors are listed alphabetically after the first author. All other co-authors are listed alphabetically after the co-lead authors. R.Q.G., S.F., L.R. and S.A.W. conceived and designed the Perspective. R.Q.G. co-ordinated the writing process. S.F. and R.Q.G. designed Figs. 1, 2, 4 and 5. R.Q.G., P.C., N.-M.N. and S.F. designed Fig. 3. R.Q.G., S.F., P.R.W. and S.A.W. designed Fig. 6. R.Q.G., S.F., J.H., P.K., N.-M.N., C.R., L.R., J.T.-J., S.A.W., P.R.W., F.A., A.K.B., E.B., R.B., P.C., R.C., R.H., T.K., I.K., A.M., R. Martins, R. McDonnell, W.N., R.R., N.S., B.R.S., J.S., D.T., C.T., Y.W. and J.W. wrote and edited the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Quentin Grafton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Edward Barbier, Howard Wheater and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Sections 1–3 and Tables 1–4.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grafton, R.Q., Fanaian, S., Horne, J. et al. Rethinking responses to the world’s water crises. Nat Sustain 8, 11–21 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01470-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01470-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy