Comparative Analysis
Comparative Analysis
Comparative Analysis
By Group 1
Road map
Topic
South-East Asian Crisis Japan Crisis
Pramod Khandelwal U.S. Sub-Prime Crisis Sachin Euro zone Sovereign Debt Ghadigaonkar Crisis Navnath Shelar
By Group 1
o Excess debt led to major failures and takeovers in case of South Korea.
o Foreign debt-to-GDP ratios rose from 100% to 180% in the four large Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) economies during the crisis. o Excessive real estate speculation.
By Group 1
o Spark: June 97, Thai government was forced to float the baht, booming economy came to a halt.
o Massive layoffs in finance, real estate, and construction, unemployment at all-time high. o Workers returning to their village and 600,000 foreign workers being sent back to their home countries. o Baht reached 56 units to the US $ in Jan 98, GDP contracted by 1.9%. o Thai stock market dropped 75%.
By Group 1
By Group 1
By Group 1
By Group 1
By Group 1
o Indonesia's monetary authorities widened the rupiah currency trading band from 8% to 12%.
o Managed floating exchange regime replaced by a free-floating exchange rate arrangement o Monetary authority of Singapore allowed gradual deprecation of 20% of Singapore dollar o Malaysian imposed strict capital controls and introduced a 3.80 peg against the US$ o The principal measure taken was to move the ringgit from a free float to a fixed exchange rate regime. By Group 1
By Group 1
Japan Crisis
Introduction:
In late 1980s, Japan implemented stringent tariffs and policies to encourage people to save their incomes resulting in loans and credits becoming easier to obtain. Further, large trade surpluses helped Yen appreciate against the foreign currencies widening the trade surplus. Excess liquidity in the financial system implemented by Bank of Japan caused overconfidence and euphoria about the economic prospects resulting into aggressive speculation particularly in Tokyo Stock Exchange and the Japan real estate market.
By Group 1
Japan Crisis
What Bubbled Japanese economy:
o Financial Liberalization, accelerating pace in deregulation and deepening of Capital Markets created excess liquidity by banks causing a land and stock market bubble. o People with spare cash bought land and shares causing them to rise. The Japanese monetary authorities were worried about inflation but they were then slow to reduce them. o Bank of Japan increased interest rates to control Inflation which aggravated the crises. Higher interest rates and slumping asset values caused an increase in loan defaults resulting in fall in assets value and share prices, which lasted 10 for years. o Due to weak corporate governance and regularity forbearance, loan defaults were compounded because Japanese banks had made a series of bad lending decisions thereby creating ZOMBIES. By Group 1
Japan Crisis
o The Japanese economic miracle was based on a strong degree of government intervention. In some respects this worked very well. But, the downside is that the government and banks tried to protect declining, inefficient industries / firms. o Technically Japan understands what must be done, but was UNWILLING to make painful Short term adjustments necessary to re-establish long run growth. o Bad monetary policies have been timid and ineffective and they were now exhausted with ZERO interest rates leading to LIQUIDITY TRAP. o Inflation expectations fell to negative. Japan had caught Capitalism worst disease - Deflation which made normal demand side policies ineffective.
By Group 1
Japan Crisis
What were the impact:
o Bubble and Burst in Land and Stock Markets: o Land value-to-GDP ratio increased from 3.3 in 1985 to 5.6 in 1990, followed by a 15 year-long decline, reaching the bottom of 2.4 in 2005. o Stock market bubble burst one year prior to land market bubble, and reached its bottom in 3 years. o What caused the bubble? o Bubble is likely to occur when the interest rate is lower than the GDP growth rate. o Call rate was lower than nominal GDP growth rate from 1987 to 1990.
By Group 1
Japan Crisis
o Land price hike in the late 1980s: o Tax rates on land holdings and transactions were reduced in 1982. Redevelopment of government-owned land was promoted from 1983.
o Land for offices in Tokyo, especially for financial services, was perceived to be in excess demand from 1985, when Ministry of Land released the forecasts of the demand for offices in Tokyo. o All these factors, along with easy monetary policy, promoted speculative transactions for land.
o Balance sheet adjustment by firms: o Non-manufacturing firms raised debt-to-asset ratio in the bubble period and it took a decade to return the leverage ratio to the prebubble period. o The debt-to-asset ratio of manufacturing firms increased after the collapse of the bubble, as the value of assets declined. By Group 1
Japan Crisis
Land surrounding of the Imperial Palace in Tokyo estimated to be worth more than whole of California
By Group 1
Japan Crisis
o Measures taken Japanese authority:
o Monetary Easing: o Bank of Japan lowered the official discount rate on July 1, 1991, and continued to lower it or the call rate (i.e., overnight interbank rate) until the call rate became zero in February 1999. o Despite the monetary easing, the land price continued to fall and the consumer price index also fell in 1995, 1999 and afterwards. o One reason for the weak effects of monetary easing on asset and goods prices is the banks balance sheets deteriorated by nonperforming loans.
o Rapid changes in monetary policy destabilizes the economy. o The rapid changes in call rates by Bank of Japan in the late 1980s and the early 1990s resulted in the volatile land prices and stagnant real economy. o Monetary policy should be conducted in a forecast able way and changed gradually to stabilize the economy. By Group 1
Japan Crisis
o Fiscal Stimulus: o The government released a series of economic policy packages from March 1992 to September 1995, increasing expenditures on public works by issuing government bonds. o The effect of fiscal stimulus on GDP was limited, partly due to the leakage to imports.
o Increases in public works as well as increases in social security benefits and decreases in tax revenues, resulted in the accumulation of government debt throughout the 1990s.
By Group 1
A Sub-prime loan: Sub-prime mortgage loans (or housing loans or junk loans) are very risky. But since profits are high where the risk is high, a lot of lenders get into this business to try and make a quick buck. Sub-prime loans are dicey as they are given to individuals who are not financially sound enough to be given a loan due to unstable incomes or low creditworthiness.
By Group 1
To solve these problems, Investment Banks came up with concept called Securitization. The pools of these loans were termed as Subprime Mortgage Loans, Mortgage-backed securities (MBS), Adjustable-rate mortgages (ARM).
Under securitization, banks sold these pools of loans to other big Financial Institutions, thus getting more liquidity and also transfer the risk associated with these loans. As per regulatory norms, a large portion of the financial institutions that are potential purchasers of these mortgage pools are not allowed to buy or are restricted from buying sub prime debt because it is considered too risky.
By Group 1
Credit Rating agencies like S&P, Fitch, Moodys gave them different ratings for each level, but the ratings were much better than they deserved.
This allowed investment bankers to sell off a large portion of the sub prime loans as debt instruments with above prime credit ratings thus expanding the number of potential buyers of that debt. Many big fund investors like hedge funds and mutual funds globally saw sub-prime loan portfolios as attractive investment opportunities. The percentage of these subprime mortgages rose from the historical 8% to approximately 20% from 2004 to 2006, with much higher ratios in some parts of the U.S.
By Group 1
Until 2006, U.S. economy was growing fast enough, the housing market was also flourishing till the Federal Reserve (FED) decided to increase interest rates, which it continued to do until fed funds rate stood at 5.25% in January of 2007 (up from 1%).
By Group 1
By Group 1
o Since these huge pools of pools rely on short term borrowing to buy the longer term debt and have to periodically roll the loans they are issuing over. o Now, they could no longer borrow short term to cover their obligations and were therefore in danger of having to sell off huge chunks of these mortgages backed securities to avoid running into financial difficulty.
o As a result these ongoing defaults and falling prices, these global financial institutions who had borrowed and invested heavily in these securities reported significant losses wiping out their net worth. Total losses were estimated in the trillions of U.S. dollars globally.
By Group 1
Pillars of Wall Street crumbled leading the pave for Global Financial Crisis
By Group 1
Sub-prime crisis led to the collapse of: o Bear Sterns, one of the world's largest investment banks and securities trading firm in U.S. Bear Sterns was bought out by JP Morgan Chase.
o Merrill Lynch and Countrywide Financial was bought out by Bank of America.
By Group 1
By Group 1
By Group 1
o U.S. Treasury dept. invested about hundreds of billion dollars in various banks & institutions through its Capital Purchase Program in an effort to prop up capital and support new lending: o American Insurance Group (AIG) was bailed out by giving $182 bn bridge loan to tide over the crisis. o Citigroup received $45 bn support in 2 installments from U.S. govt.By Group 1
By Group 1
o Structural Problem - Euro zone, having 17 nations as its members, required unanimous agreement for a decision making process which lead to failure in complete prevention of contagion of other areas.
o Fiscal indiscipline policies related to government revenues and expenses.
By Group 1
By Group 1
By Group 1
GDP - $304 billion Debt-GDP ratio 165.3% of GDP Public Debt 303.527 billion (132.4% of GDP; June 2012,) Budget Deficit 19.565 billion (9.1% of GDP) Revenues 88.075 billion (40.9% of GDP) Expenses 107.769 billion (50.1% of GDP) Unemployment 23.1% (1.147 million; May 2012)
By Group 1
By Group 1
o The ECB will draw up a mechanism in the coming weeks to make outright purchases to stabilize stressed euro zone borrowing costs.
o European governments and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have stunned global stock markets with 489 ($639 billion) in credit available to the regions troubled banks at ultra-low rates. o Second bail-out amounting to 130 billion ($173 billion) agreed in 2012. o European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF).
By Group 1
o Adopted a number of austerity packages: o Freeze in the salaries of all government employees, a 10% cut in bonuses, o On the fears of bankruptcy, the Greek parliament passed the "Economy Protection Bill", which was expected to save another 4.8 billion The measures include (in addition to the above): 30% cuts in Christmas, Easter.
o 150,000 jobs cut from state sector by 2015, of which 15,000 shall be cut by the end of 2012. o Pension cuts worth 300 million in 2012.
By Group 1
By Group 1
A comparative analysis
o Money supply o High Profit, High Risk o Massive credit expansion, avail of cheap credit o Increased speculative activities o Opening of the economy o Real Estate price boom o Over lending, credit o Over leveraged Household sector / Corporations
By Group 1
Group 1
Thank you
By Group 1