Product and Brand Management: Company Study of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)
Product and Brand Management: Company Study of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)
Product and Brand Management: Company Study of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)
PROJECT ON
Submitted byAnish Bhattacharyya [FT-09-720] Anurag Kumar Mishra [FT-09-729] Durgesh Tiwari [FT -09-748] Jagat Singh Nagar [FT -09-754] Shwetank Kumar [FT-09-856] Sourav Mukherjee [FT- 09-862] Ravi Kumar Sinha [ FT- 09-813]
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
1|Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We take this opportunity to convey our sincere thanks and gratitude to all those who have directly or indirectly helped and contributed towards the completion of this project. First and foremost, we would like to thank Prof. Pitamber Dwivedi for her constant guidance and support throughout this project. During the project, we realized that the degree of relevance of the learning being imparted in the class is very high. The learning enabled us to get a better understanding of the nitty-gritty of the subject which we studied. We would also like to thank our batch mates for the discussions that we had with them. All these have resulted in the enrichment of our knowledge and their inputs have helped us to incorporate relevant issues into our project. Last but not the least we would like to thank God and our parents for their cooperation and help.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
2|Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOPICS 1. Introduction to FMCG/HUL 2. FMCG industry analysis 3. Key players of FMCG industry and their brief introduction 4. HUL Organization Structure Distribution Channel Market segment wise penetration Products of HUL Category wise Sales growth BCG analysis 5. Corporate Social Responsibility Project Shakti 6. Competition In the FMCG market HUL and ITC HUL and P&G 7. Strategic growth and Strategic market entry (Kissan Annapurna Iodized Salt) 8. Strategic Shifts 9. Financial Analysis 10. Brand Management 11. Conclusion and Recommendation 12. Bibliography
26 27 25 16 14 9 PAGE 4 5 7
29
31 32
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
3|Page
360675 individual shareholders and financial institutions Brooke bond is present in India back to 1900 and its Red Label band was launched in 1903. In 1912 it joined with lever brothers. Unilever acquired LIPTON in 1972 Ponds India ltd is working in India since 1947 and it is acquired by HUL in 1986 by an international acquisition. Tata oil Mills Company merged with HUL in 1993. In 1996 Tata made 50-50% joint venture for LAKME with HUL and in 1998 it was completely sold to HUL. HUL made 50-50% joint venture with Kimberley Clark corp. in 1994 as Kimberley clark lever ltd which makes haggis diapers and kotex sanitary pads. Unilever established its subsidiary in Nepal as NEPAL UNILEVER LTD. In 2002 HUL launched AYUSH ayurvedic soap. In 2004 it came into the water purifier segment and launched PURE-it In 2007 it formally formed as HUL from HUL that is HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED.
FMCG came into in existence in 1888 when Sun Light soap was firstly seen at KOLKATA harbor. It was made by Lever brothers in England. After that in 1895 Lifebuoy and after that Lux, Pears and Vim bar. In 1918 Vanaspati was launched. Dalda was launched in 1937. In 1931 Lever brothers made 1st subsidiary in India In 1933 they joint with Hindustan Vanaspati manufacturing company In 1935 they joint with traders limited All these 3 players mixed together and form HUL in 1957. HUL offers 10% of its equity to Indian public Unilever holds 52.10% shares and rest is distributed amongst about
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
united
4|Page
SUPPLIER POWER
Low
Supplier concentration Importance of volume to supplier Differentiation of inputs Impact of inputs on cost or differentiation Switching costs of firms in the industry Presence of substitute inputs Threat of forward integration Cost relative to total purchases in industry
.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
Relative power of unions, govt
High
Low to medium
DEGREE OF RIVALRY
High
BARRIERS TO ENTRY
Absolute cost advantages Proprietary learning curve Access to inputs Government policy Economies of scale Capital requirements Brand identity Switching costs Access to distribution Expected retaliation Proprietary products
-Exit barriers -Industry concentration -Fixed costs/Value added -Industry growth -Intermittent overcapacity -Product differences -Switching costs -Brand identity -Diversity of rivals -Corporate stakes
THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
-Switching costs -Buyer inclination to Substitute -Price-performance Trade-off of substitutes
BUYER POWER
Bargaining leverage Buyer volume Buyer information Brand identity Price sensitivity Threat of backward integration Product differentiation Buyer concentration vs. industry Substitutes available Buyers' incentives
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
Low
High
5|Page
Rivalry among Competing Firms: In the FMCG Industry, rivalry among competitors is very fierce. There are scarce customers because the industry is highly saturated and the competitors try to snatch their share of market. Market Players use all sorts of tactics and activities from intensive advertisement campaigns to
choices and needs give a sufficient room for new product development that can replace existing goods. This leads to higher consumers expectation.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The bargaining power of suppliers of raw materials and intermediate goods is not very high. There is ample number of substitute suppliers available and the raw materials are also readily available and
promotional stuff and price wars etc. Hence the intensity of rivalry is very high.
Potential Entry of New Competitors: FMCG Industry does not have any measures which can control the entry of new firms. The resistance is very low and the structure of the industry is so complex that new firms can easily enter and also offer tough competition due to cost effectiveness. Hence potential entry of new firms is highly viable.
most
of
the
raw
materials
are
homogeneous. There is no monopoly situation in the supplier side because the suppliers are also competing among themselves.
Bargaining Power of Consumers: Bargaining power of consumers is also very high. This is because in FMCG industry the switching costs of most of the
Potential Development of Substitute Products: There are complex and never ending consumer needs and no firm can satisfy all sorts of needs alone. There are plenty of substitute goods available in the market that can be re-placed if consumers are not satisfied with one. The wide range of
goods is very low and there is no threat of buying one product over other. Customers are never reluctant to buy or try new things off the shelf.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
6|Page
Key
players
of
capture a market share of 10 per cent of the Rs. 1,900 Crores malted food drink market over the next two years.
FMCG industry
According to the market survey done by BUSINESS TODAY the top 10 companies of FMCG sector are given below.
Dabur has acquired 72.15 per cent of Fem Care Pharma Ltd (FCPL), a leading player in the womens skin care products market, for Rs 203.7 Crores in an all-cash deal. The Company is expected to create
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. ITC Nestl India GCMMF (AMUL) Dabur India Asian Paints (India) Cadbury India Britannia Industries Procter & Gamble Marico Industries
synergy by this deal. Dabur got approval from Government of Himachal Pradesh to set up another medicine manufacturing unit. The project has an expected investment of Rs. 130 Crores. Colgate-Palmolive Limited Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd, which is currently holding 75 per cent of the share capital of SS Oral Hygiene Products Private Ltd, Hyderabad, has acquired the remaining 25 per cent share capital from the local shareholders at an aggregate price of Rs 77.70 lakh. Consequently, SS
(India)
Oral Hygiene Products has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the company. Nestle India Limited Nestle is planning to invest Rs 6 billion in India in 2009 for expansion of its business in the country.The company which has allotted an investment of Rs 3 billion in the Indian market in 2008, would
7|Page
be doubling the investment in 2009 as part of its business strategy. Nestle International is reinvesting and expanding in India and Nestle India will have all the financial resources to expand and grow from the parent company. Nestle India reported a good increase in its standalone net profit for the second quarter.During the quarter, the profit of the company rose 26.54% to Rs 1,210.90
million from Rs 956.90 million in the same quarter, last year. The company posted earnings of Rs 12.56 a share during the quarter, registering 26.61% growth over prior year period. Net sales for the quarter rose 23.45% to Rs 10,356.30 million, while total income for the quarter rose 23.78% to Rs 10,423.40 million, when compared with the prior year period.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
8|Page
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
VP
GM
Sr sales manager
Team Leader
Sales executive
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
9|Page
C&F Agents
Redistribution Stockiest
Whole sellers
Rural Retailer
Urban Retailer
CUSTOMERS
SAMPOOS: 21%
TOOTHPASTE: 26%
Penetration
10 | P a g e
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
HUL products in India Personal wash: Foods:-Kissan(Jam,Ketchup,Squashes), Ice-cream: Bewerages:Tea: Disinfectants: Domex cif Brooke bond, Lipton, taj mahal Brooke bond bru Deo spray: Water Purifier: Dishwasher : Vim Pureit Axe Rexona Kwality Wall's Oral-Care: Pepsodent Close-up Annapurna (Aata and salt), Knorr Soups, Modern Bread Hair-Care: Sunsilk naturals, Clinic , Dove Lux. Lifebuoy, Liril , Hamam, Breeze, Moti , Dove, Pears Rexona Laundry: Beauty Products: Fair & Lovely, Lakme, Ponds, Vaseline Aviance Surf Excel, sun light, Rin Wheel Ala bleech
Coffee:-
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
11 | P a g e
Particulars
Fabric wash
Rank
6632
54.3%
1 1 1
Sunsilk, Clinic plus Talcum Powder Packet Tea Coffee Jams Toothpaste Pepsoden t, Closeup Red Label Bru
1 1 1 1 2
Ketchups
28.1%
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
12 | P a g e
Soap & Detergent and Tea are CASH COW for the company. It has high relative market share and low growth rate. Personal Products and Coffee are STARS for the company as it have high relative market share as well as high market growth rate.
Only food
is
a segment
which
is
QUESTION MARK for the company. The company have a low relative market share where as it is under high market growth rate. HUL is taking several steps to capture more market share so that food segment can also be a part of Star.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
13 | P a g e
called project SHAKTI which will serve the following purpose: A) To Reach: Small, scattered settlements and poor infrastructure difficult. Over 500,000 villages not reached directly by HUL. B) To Communicate: Low literacy hampers effectiveness of print media. Poor media-reach: 500 million Indians lack TV& radio. C) To Influence: Low category penetration, make distribution
consumption. C) Awareness: Per capita consumption in Unilever categories is 33% of urban level. Project Shakti
planning to sponsor the world toilet day on the 19th November every year. HUL soon realized that although it was enjoying a greater penetration in the rural
market
when
compared
with
its
competitor such as Nirma and ITC, its direct reach was restricted to only 16%. The FMCG giant was desperate to increase this share. HUL saw its dream fulfillment in the vast Indian rural market. The company was already engaged in rural development with the launch of the Integrated Rural Development Programme in 1976 in the Etah district of Uttar
14 | P a g e
Pradesh. This program was in tandem with HUL's dairy operations and covered 500 villages in Etah. Subsequently, the company introduced similar programs in adjacent villages. These activities mainly aimed at training farmers, animal
of the Project Shakti was that it was aimed to create income-generating capabilities for underprivileged rural women, by providing a sustainable micro enterprise opportunity, and to improve rural living standards through health and hygiene awareness. Most SHG women viewed Project Shakti as a powerful business proposition and are keen participants in it. There after it was extended in other states with the total strength of over 40,000 Shakti Entrepreneurs. HUL offered a wide range of products to the SHGs, which were relevant to rural customers. HUL invested
husbandry, generating alternative income, health & hygiene and infrastructure development. The main issue in rural development was to generating prospects create incomefor the poor
villagers. Such initiatives, linked with the company's core business, became
successful and sustainable and proved to be mutually beneficial to both the company ant its rural customers. However much more remained to be done. Project Shakti was conceived following the pioneering work carried out by Grameen Bank of Bangladesh , Self Help Groups (SHGs) of rural women were formed by several institutions, NGOs and government bodies in villages across India. This group of usually 15 members contributed a small amount of money to a common pool and then offered a micro-credit to a member of the group to invest in a commonly approved economic activity. Partnering with these SHGs, HUL started its Project Shakti in
significantly in resources who work with the women on the field and provide them with on-the-job training and support. HUL provided the
necessary training to these groups on the basics of enterprise management, which the women need to manage their enterprises. For the SHG women, this translated sustainable into a much-needed, contributing
income
towards better living and prosperity. Armed with micro-credit, women from SHGs become direct-to-home
Nalgonda district of Andhra Pradesh in 50 villages in the year 2000. The social side
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_ 15 | P a g e
16 of HUL's brands featured in AC-Nielson Brand Equity list of 100 most trusted brands in 2008 in an annual survey. For the entire year
Overall low cost leadership strategy Best cost provider's strategy Broad differentiation strategy Focused low cost strategy Focused differentiation strategy
ending March - 2009 net turnover of company is Rs. 20'239.33 Crore which is 47.99% higher than 31st December 2007's Rs. 13675.43 Crore driven mainly by domestic FMCG's with net profit stood at Rs. 2'496.45 Crore.
Here competitive strategy varies from sector to sector and company to company. Thus, it is not easy to predict a single or to find a single strategy for the whole sector. When we come on to FMCG Sector main strategies lay behind market strategies, cost, and quality strategies. Here in this report you are going to get information about such type of strategies of FMCG giants. This Company was earlier known as Imperial Tobacco Company of India Ltd. It is Currently headed by Yogesh Chander Deveshwar. Company mainly operates in the industry like Tobacco, Foods, Hotels, Stationary and Products of HUL are: Annapurna; Ayush; Axe; Breeze; Bru; Brooke bond; Clinic; Dove; Fair & Lovely; Hamam; Liril; Lux; Pears; Ponds; Pepsodent; Pureit; Rexona; Rin;
Greeting Cards with the major products constitutes Cigarettes, packed foods, hotels, and apparels. For the entire year ending Mar2009 the turnover of company is at Rs. 15388 Crore which is 10.3% higher than previous year's Rs. 13947.53 Crore, driven mainly by robust 20% growth in non cigarette FMCG business with net profit stood at Rs. 3324 Crore.
16 | P a g e
Analysis of Both Companies HUL & ITC are major companies in FMCG market in India. When we compare both companies on the basis of their strategies i.e. , their competitive strategies in the present market. When we look at the present segment breakup for both of the companies then we came to know that their different products vary too much in the market. Now let us take a comparative analysis of both the companies under some heads: HUL Hindustan Unilever (HUL) is the largest pureplay FMCG Company in the country and has one of the widest portfolio of products sold via a strong distribution channel. It owns and markets some of the most popular brands in the country across various categories,
Performance After stagnating between 1999 and '04, the company is back on the growth track. In the past three years, till 2008 HUL's net sales have witnessed a CAGR of 11%, while net profit has posted a CAGR of 17%. Despite diversification, ITC's reliance on cigarettes is still huge. The tobacco business contributes 40% to its revenues, and accounts for over 80% of its profit. This cash-generating business has enabled it to take ambitious, but expensive bets in new segments and deliver modest profit growth. Overall Strategy: HUL always believes in customer friendly products with major emphasis on low cost overall without compromising on the quality of the product. They are leveraging the capabilities and scale of the parent company and focusing on the value of execution. The entire product portfolio is also being tweaked
including soaps, detergents, shampoos, tea and face creams. ITC ITC is not a pure-play FMCG company, since cigarettes is its primary business. It is diversifying into non-tobacco. FMCG
to include premium offerings such as Pond's Age Miracle and dove shampoo in skin and hair care. HUL introduced Project Shakti to penetrate the rural market. ITC is focusing on delivering value at competitive prices. Its tremendous reach through extensive distribution chain has been a competitive company's
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
segments like foods, personal care, paper products, hotels and agri-business to reduce its exposure to cigarettes.
advantage. e-choupal
the direct
17 | P a g e
procurement is well known under which ITC partners with over 100,000 farmers for spices and wheat procurement and an even larger number for oilseeds. This kind of rural pedigree is hard to beat. Growth Drivers HUL has been launching new products and brand extensions, with investments being made towards brand-building and increasing its market share. HUL is also streamlining its various business operations, in line with the One Unilever' philosophy adopted by the Unilever group worldwide. Introduction of premium products and addition of new consumers via market expansion will be HUL's growth drivers. ITC's backward integration to ensure that its products pass efficiently from the farms to consumers has helped it to cut down supply and procurement costs. ITC's non-cigarette FMCG business leverages the the large has
Being an MNC operating in India, HUL is more conservative in its strategies than its Indian counterparts. Moreover, given
increasing competition, it faces the risk of being overtaken by domestic players in various categories. Prolonged inflation may lead to margin contraction, in case HUL is not able to pass on this burden to consumers. The company's large size also poses a problem, since it does not give HUL the agility to address the competition it faces from national and regional players. For ITC Increased regulatory clamps on tobacco, along with rising tax burden, pose a business risk for ITC. So, it has started an ambitious
diversification plan, which has its own set of risks. With its foray into the conventional FMCG space, ITC has entered the high-clutter branded products market. This will burden its resources in terms of ad spend and brandbuilding. Creating brand recall and building market share in new products are ITC's key challenges. Export ban and rising crop prices pose a threat for its agri-business, taxing its margins.
distribution
network
company
developed by selling cigarettes over the years. A rich product mix, along with ramp-up of investments in its new sectors, will be instrumental in charting ITC's growth path. Risk for both the companies For HUL
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
18 | P a g e
According to the Nielsen Company, in 2007 P&G spent more on U.S. advertising than any other company; the $2.62 billion spent by P&G is almost twice as much as that spent by General Motors, the next company on the Nielsen list. P&G was named 2008 Advertiser of the Year by Cannes International Advertising Festival. Proctor & Gamble is a leading member of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition, a
Washington D.C.-based coalition of over 400 major companies and NGOs that advocates for a larger International Affairs Budget, which funds American diplomatic and development efforts abroad.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
19 | P a g e
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
20 | P a g e
STRATEGIES OF P&G P&G focuses on five core strengths required to win in the consumer products
Consumer Understanding No company in the world has invested more in consumer and market research than P&G. We interact with more than five million consumers each year in nearly 60 countries around the world. P&G invest more than $350 million a year in consumer understanding. This results in insights that tell us where the innovation opportunities are and how to serve and communicate with consumers.
Innovation P&G is the innovation leader in this industry. Virtually all the organic sales growth delivered in the past nine years has come from new brands and new or improved continually product strengthen innovation. our We
innovation
capability and pipeline by investing two times more, on average, than our major competitors. In addition, we multiply our internal innovation capability with a global network of innovation partners outside P&G. More than half of all product
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
21 | P a g e
innovation coming from P&G today includes at least one major component from an external partner. The IRI New Product Pacesetter Report ranks the bestselling new products in our industry in the U.S. every year. Over the past 14 years, P&G has had 114 top 25 Pacesetters more than our six largest competitors combined. In the last year alone, P&G had five of the top 10 new product launches in the U.S. and 10 of the top 25. Brand-Building P&G is the brand-building leader of this industry. It has built the strongest portfolio of brands in the industry with 22 billiondollar brands and 20 half-billion-dollar brands. Eleven of the billion-dollar brands are the #1 global market share leaders of their categories. The majority of the balances are #2. Go-to-Market Capabilities It has established industry-leading go-tomarket capabilities. P&G is consistently
ranked by leading retailers in industry surveys as a preferred supplier and as the industry leader in a wide range of capabilities including clearest company strategy, brands most important to
retailers, strong business fundamentals and innovative marketing programs. Scale Over the decades, we have also established significant scale advantages as a total company and in individual categories, countries and retail channels. P&Gs scale advantage is driven as much by
knowledge-sharing, common systems and processes, and best practices as it is by size and scope. These scale benefits enable us to deliver consistently superior consumer and shareholder value. P&G follows Connect + Develop strategy which enables to bring innovations to life faster, more economically and more sustainably.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
22 | P a g e
HUL AND P&G ADVERTIESMENT WAR The new campaign started by Rin, a product of Hindustan Unilever Limited. It is a direct attack on the Tide
7. Lady 1
gets
astonished
by the
whiteness seen. 8. Lady 2s kid reacts by asking he mother, as to why is the other lady so observant and amazed 9. There is a disclaimer during the ad that the analysis has been done by an independent agency 10. Its then claimed that now there is promotional price of Rs. 25 on Rin as opposed to the earlier Rs. 35. As it can be noticed, there is a direct mention of the competitor product along with the visuals. This one seems to be an absolute direct attack. It is difficult to say if the ad will continue on TV. Tide would definitely come out with a protest. However, I think the damage is already done. The main point about the reduced price of Rin would definitely catch the consumers eye benefiting HUL.
Naturals product by Procter & Gamble. Note that when It is said a direct attack it means an uncensored visual shows the competitor product and then highlights how the other product is better then the former. The sequence of the ad is as follows 1. Two ladies are standing on a bus stop, waiting to pick their kids from the school bus. 2. Both are carrying their shopping basket/bag with them. 3. Lady 1 has Tide Naturals in her bag. 4. Lady 2 has Rin in her bag 5. Both ladies have a look at each others bag and Lady 1 boasts that Tide has a good fragrance and provide better whiteness/brightness to the clothes 6. In the meantime, the school bus arrives and its shown that the white shirt of Lady 2s kid is strikingly brighter and whiter then the Lady 1s kid.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
23 | P a g e
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
24 | P a g e
manufacturing and selling wheat flour and utilized it into the selling breads produced by wheat flour. HUL is more focused on the innovations Example: In 1995
launched KISSAN ANNAPURNA staple foods with the message staple food including iodized salt Serving Rural population: In 2000 the 32% of the sales were from rural sector but in 2010 it is more than 50%. It follows direct communication from the customers. It believes in expanding the
marketing strategy as there were other salts including iodine but no one was focused on that. HUL started it. Started endorsement through
portfolio. Each category has a different set of supply chain, production and
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
25 | P a g e
Strategic Shifts
In the past 10 years, HUL has made four shifts in its business strategy, targeted at boosting growth and reach POWER BRANDS: Strategy in 2000. Focusing on fewer brands, 30 of them, and showering marketing attention on them.
PUMP UP THE VOLUMES: Strategy in 2010. Global CEO Paul Polman is pushing the Indian operations chasing value growth to deliver on the volumes as well.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
26 | P a g e
45,281
67,235
60,612
66,314
73,424
20,724
30,402
26,573
26,673
31,157
Change (%) Margin (%) Depreciation Int. and Fin. Charges Other Income Recurring Pro fit before T axes Change (%) Margin (%) Tax Deferred Tax Tax Rate (%)
13.7 14.9 1,384 255 2,379 21,464 15.3 15.7 3,643 389
18.8
0.4 13.7 2,006 112 1,457 26,013 -1.4 13.6 5,463 468
22.8 20,082
13.2 12.7
1,824 19,256
43.5 12.4
-43 24,965
-19.0 11.7
-144 20,112
-0.9 10.5
0 20,082
17.5 11.0
0 23,590
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
27 | P a g e
If we analyze this financial statement we can see that the performance of HUL has decreased over the last two years and the possible reasons for that are-
getting full competition from the P&G and others like ITC,
AMUL,DABUR,NESTLE etc
on the
Higher
expenses
HUL due to which it has ignored most of the brands and just focusing only on the power brands.
advertisement part. HUL is the king of distribution channel in India but now it is
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
28 | P a g e
HUL has the objective of being a national player (not a niche or a regional marketer) and the leader therein. HUL also wants about 30 per cent of the corporate income to come from this line. So, HUL opted for the strategy of developing quite a few strong brands in this line, and among them they cover different market segments and price points. Dove, Lux, Liril, Rexona, Pears and Lifebuoy are the outcome of such a well planned brand strategy implemented over time. Lifebuoy is 100 years old and Liril 15 years old. In fact, HUL has about 10 brands of toilet soaps each having good volume of sale to its credit . The point is that decisions on brand portfolio are a fundamental expression of the companys objectives and strategy governing a given business. HUL Locates Positioning Opportunities: HUL methodically goes about the task of developing a brand portfolio across a product category. It first identifies the various positioning opportunities across benefits, target groups and price points. Existing brads are mapped across these positioning opportunities, and gaps for possible new offers are explored.The company then estimates the likely volumes for each of the possible opportunity and the financial viability and sustainability of
29 | P a g e
understanding of the complexity of the brand management task. We shall examine how HUL handles the complex demands in brand management. Such an array of brands is the outcome of a conscious corporate strategy by HUL. As a corporate, HUL wants to be a leader in every one of its businesses and the strategy is to fight on the strength of the competitive
advantage arising from the possession of strong brands. It is this strategy that is getting reflected in the development of a multitude of strong brands. If we take the business of bathing soaps, as an example,
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
the propositions in the long term. If some of these gaps look promising, HUL goes ahead with the plans. It examines the existing set of brands with the company, the product technologies available, the benefits that can be provided and other considerations that have a bearing on the companys long term interests in the business. Finally, if the company decides to go in for the new offer, a decision has to be taken as to whether new brands should be created or extensions if existing brands should be preferred or ongoing brands from the market acquired.
origin to the success of the Dettol lotion, HUL assessed that a Savlon antiseptic soap could be successfully extended from the Savlon lotion. It entered into an agreement with J&J for the use of Savlon brand name and the product formula, and launched the Savlon antiseptic soap. HUL very deftly managed successfully new brand launch and merged as a challenger to Dettol soap. J&J secures a good royalty from HUL for lending the brand. It is a potentially win-win arrangement for both companies.
Repositioning and rebranding HUL hires brands to capture new opportunities: Towards the close of the
1990s, HUL found that the germicide segment of the soap market was growing fast, with RCIs Dettol antiseptic soap leading it. HUL did not have suitable offer in its stable to capture a share of this segment. Lifebuoy was not strictly HUL has done the process of repositioning the brands. Few of them as follows; SUNSILK: Sunsilk co-creations , collaboration with 7 pioneer global hair experts BREEZE: New fragrances over the world, new look more colors, packaging Rexona: relaunched it with the coconut moistening Lifebuoy hand sanitizer: kills
meeting the particular benefit. HUL knew that launching and developing a new brand would take a lot of time and resources, and the company would miss the market if it chose this route. HUL did not have the product formula either to enter this segment. It was in this background that HUL decided to hire the Savlon brand from J&J. Savlon was a successful antiseptic lotion, a competitor to Dettol lotion. Just as the Dettol soap owed its
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
99.99% germs in 15 seconds Fairness cream: Fair & lovely multivitamin Close-up: peppermint splash Pepsodent flexibility.
30 | P a g e
toothbrush:
25%
Conclusion
&
hotels, paper and agri-businesses. Investors who want to bank on its execution ability in FMCG can consider the stock with a long-term horizon.
Recommendations
HUL's up-and-running business model is a treat for investors seeking exposure in the FMCG segment. The company has
According to us the companies should continue with their CSR and also continue with their strategies. The thing that needs to be changed is that, ITC should go for more diversification in Non cigarette segment (FMCG) while HUL should come
delivered in the past and has the potential to do better in future. In short term. HULs growth story is evolving. ITC is eyeing the pie which HUL and other FMCG players currently enjoy. Though risky, the company's business model will pay off in the long run. ITC has proved its expertise in the cigarettes,
up with the new strategies that could take the new product forward to create a new segment. A recommendation For HUL is that it should focus on rural area more.
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
31 | P a g e
IILM-GSM-09-11_PBM_SEC-A_
32 | P a g e