Bioinformatics in PAM AND BLOSUM
Bioinformatics in PAM AND BLOSUM
AND BLOSUM
PRESENTED BY:
GAJENDRA SINGH VISHWAKARMA
MSc II Yr
Contents
Introduction
What is PAM
PAM properties and method
PAM250
What is BLOSUM
BLOSUM property and method
Comparison Between PAM and
BLOSUM
Introduction
Deriving a frequency
Computing a logarithm of
tables from a data base
odds matrix
of blocks
1 .. .. w 1.2
1 A .. .. ..
7.5 6.3
.. .. .. .. .. 1.9 5.5 3.1
S .. .. .. .. 6.5 2.0 8.1 4.3
3.7 5.8 2.9 7.7 3.2
PAM vs BLOSUM
Dayhoff estimated mutation rates from
substitutions observed in closely related
proteins and extrapolated those rates to
models distant relationships.
In BLOSUM approach, frequencies were
obtained directly from relationships
represented in the block, regardless of
evolutionary distance.
The Dayhoff frequency table included 36
pairs in which no accepted point
mutations.
PAM vs BLOSUM
Incontrast, the pairs counted with
BLOSUM, included no fewer than
2369 occurrences of any particular
substitution.
• The BLOSUM matrices depend only
on the identity and composition of
groups protein in Prosite.
• Therefore, there is no expectation
that these substitution matrices will
change significantly in the future.
PAM Versus BLOSUM
PAM is based on an evolutionary
model.
BLOSUM is based on protein families.
PAM is based on global alignment.
BLOSUM is based on local alignment.
Referances
ESSENTIAL OF BIOINFORMATCES
BY- JIN XIONG
• BIOINFORMATICS BY RASTOGY
• www.bioinformatics.cs.vt.edu
• www.cshprotocals.org
• www.biotechnica.org
THANX FOR U R PATIENCE