LED Roadway Lighting e Catalogue

Product Catalog
LRL Product Catalog EN 2012-04-17
Leading the LED technology wave
Table of Contents
About LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Introducing the SatelliteTM Series . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Product Specifications SAT-24S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 SAT-48S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 SAT-72M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 SAT-96M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 SAT-120L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 SAT-144L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Catalog Numbering System: How to Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 8 Performance Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 Light Loss Factor Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 Equivalency Tables HPS vs. LRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 MH vs. LRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 6 MV vs. LRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 7 Brackets and Accessories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 8 Installation Instructions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Case Studies and Application Examples Bridge Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7 City Mazda (Halifax, NS, Canada) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 8 Bouchard Auto (Lancaster, MA, USA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 9 10,000 fixture evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 0 South Street, Halifax, NS, Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Asker, Norway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 Cozumel, Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 Sao Paulo, Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4 Canso Causeway, NS, Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 Armdale Rotary, Halifax, NS, Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 Grote Street, Adelaide, Australia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7 Sparwood, BC, Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 8 Financing Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9 Adaptive Lighting - Streetlight IntelligenceTM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 Installation List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8 White Papers Scotopic & Photopic Considerations for Street & Roadway Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Incorporating Spectrum Effects for Brightness Perception and Visual Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9 Reliability Prediction Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8 DMD Engineering Report Summary - Nova Scotia Pilot Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1 NOTE: All information provided in this catalog, including technical and specification data, is subject to change without notice.
About LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.

About LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. Overview
LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. (LRL) is a leading designer and manufacturer of LED (lightemitting diode) based street and area lighting fixtures and control systems. LRL is located in Nova Scotia, Canada, with research and design facilities in Halifax and a 55,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Amherst. LRL offers a complete range of LED based street and area lighting fixtures that meet or exceed IES (Illuminating Engineering Society), CIE (Commission Internationale de LEclairage) and IDA (International Dark Sky Association) requirements. LRLs products are RoHS compliant (free of lead and mercury), provide energy savings of up to 80%, and substantially reduced maintenance costs.
Facts and Figures Established: 2002 Company Organization: Privately Held Corporation Headquarters: Halifax, NS, Canada Design Office: Halifax, NS, Canada Manufacturing Locations: Amherst, NS, Canada 55,000 ft2 (5100 m2) Facility Mooresville, NC, USA (in full compliance with Buy America requirements of ARRA) South Wales, UK Experience: Manufacturing LED-based products since 2003 RoHS (lead-free) manufacturing certification: 2005 Number of employees: 100+ First street light installation: 2008 Number of municipal and utility installations globally: More than 300 clients in more than 25 countries Local sales and technical support provided by factory representatives based in Canada, the U.S., and UK, as well as a network of more than 40 independent rep firms and distributors in Canada, the U.S., Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, South Africa, and Australia Applications: Street lighting, outdoor area, pathway, building exterior, parking area, security/perimeter, outdoor retail (e.g. automotive dealership), bridges and tunnels.
Our Mission Statement
To provide the most energy efficient and maintenance-free outdoor LED lighting solutions; helping our customers save money and improve their lighting with a positive impact on the environment.
Leadership
LRLs founder and CEO Chuck Cartmill has a strong track record in the creation, management, and operation of diverse businesses. His first venture, a manufacturers representative firm focused on lighting products, was founded in 1974 and is still in operation today, as are his numerous other business ventures focused in the electrical and electronics industries. Mr. Cartmills leadership and entrepreneurial spirit has been recognized by numerous organizations including Ernst & Youngs Entrepreneur of the Year Award (2006 Atlantic Region), and he has been frequently named as one of Atlantic Canadas Top 50 CEOs by Atlantic Business Magazine. Mr. Cartmills business approach, which includes being debt-averse, empowering employees, encouraging innovation, and most importantly, building strong and lasting customer relationships has been the cornerstone to his success, and the success of LRL. Mr. Cartmill is guided by a management team with a wealth of experience in diverse industries and by members of a board of directors that are highly respected in their fields.
Innovation in Design
LRLs Satellite series fixtures have been designed for maximum efficiency, performance, and reliability. Under the direction of CTO Dr. Jack Josefowicz, LRLs design team has created an LED fixture with a true 20 year design life. Drawing on his extensive experience in the aerospace field, Dr. Josefowicz determined that commercial-grade, off-the-shelf components cannot provide the life expectancy demanded by municipal and other users. LRL also recognized that the most common failure point in an LED fixture is not the LEDs, but rather the power supply (driver). High failure rate components were eliminated from the fixture design (optocouplers, commercial-grade capacitors, potting, etc.) and instead, aerospace and automotivegrade components were employed. Our approach is based on the concept of reliability, rather than replaceability. The end result is that the life of the power electronics is consistent with the expected 20 year life of the LEDs. LRLs in-house design team has developed no less than 12 articles of intellectual property related to the Satellite series fixtures. These innovations include our unique optics system, which delivers maximum target lumens to the roadway surface; our high-reliability power supply, and our thermal management system.

All elements of LRLs fixture are designed to be replaceable, upgradeable and recyclable (e.g.. power supply, light engine, etc.).
Email: info@ledroadwaylighting.com
Reliability
All power supplies and light engines used in Satellite series fixtures are designed andmanufactured by LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. to ensure reliability and total process control. LRL is the only manufacturer providing LED power supplies that are independently evaluated according to Telcordia SR-332, the globally dominant standard for assessing reliability of electronics assemblies. With MTBF values of up to 3.302 million hours, LRL power supplies are the most reliable in the industry, and this is supported with independent test data.
LRLs SAT-S luminaire for street and area lighting applications.
Single Source Responsibility
LRLs level of vertical integration is another reason to select Satellite series fixtures. All power supplies, light engines, and electronics are designed, manufactured and tested in-house. When selecting LRL for your project, you are dealing with the manufacturer, not an integrator of third-party components. We offer true single source responsibility.
Performance
All performance data provided by LRL is supported by independent test reports, including LM-79 and LM-80 data. We also provide our customers with a layout service, which includes detailed layout creation, as well as customer-specific requirements such as side-by-side comparisons, ROI calculations, and environmental impact reports.
Nitrogen-fed soldering process for lead-free solder joint integrity.
Controls and Monitoring (Streetlight Intelligence)
Our Streetlight Intelligence adaptive lighting controls are compatible with LED, High Pressure Sodium, Metal Halide and Mercury Vapor lighting systems. The Streetlight Intelligence system includes dimming capability, fixture outage reporting, energy consumption measurement (to within 1% accuracy), and Central Asset Management software. Dimming schedules can be user-defined, and programmed using a handheld device, supplied by LRL.
XRF analyzer for analysis of component chemistry.
Responsiveness
LED Roadway Lighting Limited is small enough to be flexible and responsive to individual customer requirements, yet large enough to support your projects now and in the future. Our in-house design and manufacturing, combined with an empowering management, supports innovation and reduced time to market. Our CEO is active in the day to day operation of the business and highly responsive to customer demands.
Assembly workstation.
Installations
A partial listing of installation locations is found below:

Canada (installations in all provinces and 2 territories) U.S.A. (installations in 25 states) France (Paris) Colombia (Bogota) Australia (Adelaide, Dry Creek, Unley) Faroe Islands (Torshavn) Dominican Republic Iceland (Reykjavik) Puerto Rico (San Juan) Norway (Asker, Trgstad, Halden, Rakkestad) UAE (Dubai) South Africa (Mogale, Brachenhurst) Mexico Panama (Panama City) Switzerland (Steinmaur, Schfflisdorf) UK (numerous installations)
Independent Verification of Results: Read the third party report detailing our 1,100 fixture pilot in Nova Scotia (available on our website)
Introducing the SatelliteTM Series
Introducing the Satellite Series

LED Roadway Lighting Ltd (LRL) Satellite series fixtures were designed for maximum efficiency, performance, reliability, and a 20 year design life. Drawing on extensive experience in the electronics, LED and aerospace fields, our design team determined that commercial-grade, off-the-shelf components cannot provide the life expectancy demanded by municipal and other users. LRL also recognized that the most common failure point in an LED fixture is not the LEDs, but rather the power supply (driver). High failure rate components were eliminated from the fixture design (e.g. optocouplers, commercial-grade capacitors, potting, etc.) and instead, aerospace and automotive-grade components were employed. Our approach is based on the concept of reliability, rather than replaceability. The end result is that the life of the power supply electronics is consistent with the expected 20 year life of the LEDs. Our design approach addresses all of the critical elements of LED fixture design (see below).
Mechanical Assembly
Solid, one-piece casting for maximum heat dissipation and reliability Self-cleaning design Unique drip-edge prevents wicking of moisture No bird spikes required Accepts standard NEMA twist-lock photocontrols
Heat Sink Fins Aluminum Core Circuit Board Light Emitting Diode Reflector Lens
LRL Satellite Series Thermal Management System
Unique fin design provides a self-cleaning feature
Optics
IP66 sealed light engine compartment Light engines are placed at 30 degree angles for maximum illumination of the road surface Proprietary reflective cup system Aluminum-core light engine circuit board is physically attached to the housing for increased heat dissipation Durable acrylic lens cover provides excellent light transmission and is UV resistant IES Type II, III and other distribution patterns available
Angled light engines = more light on the road surface
Proprietary reflective cup system
Acrylic lens cover
Typical Light Distribution Comparison: LRL vs. Competing Technologies

Light Distribution Comparison
LED Roadway Lighting (LRL) units provide uniform light coverage
Current technology High Pressure Sodium (HPS) fixtures have yellow cast and vertical light pollution
Typical competitor LED coverage leaves dark sections between fixtures
Light distribution at 180 ft (55 m) pole spacings

LED Roadway Lighting (LRL) Typical HPS Typical Competitor LED
Consistent Lighting (No Dark Band)
Dark Band
Dark Band
Power Supply (Driver) Electronics

20 year design life In-house designed and manufactured, purpose-built, using the highest quality aerospace and automotive grade components IP66 sealed power supply compartment: No need for potting compounds that reduce reliability Reliability analysis using Telcordia SR-332
Power Supply Design for 20 year Life Reliability
Testing
LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. fixtures comply with the following standards and specifications: ANSI C62.41 Surge Voltages in Low Voltage AC Power Circuits ANSI C136.10 Locking-type Photocontrol Devices and Mating Receptacles ANSI C136.15 Luminaire Field Identification ANSI C136.31 Roadway Luminaire Vibration ANSI C136.37 Solid State Light Sources Used in Roadway and Area Lighting ANSI C136.3 Roadway Luminaire Attachment - min. of +/- 3 tilt of luminaire about the tenon when mounting. IES/ANSI RP-8 American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting EN-61000-3-2 Harmonic Current Emissions IES LM-79-08 Electric and Photometric Measurements of Solid State Lighting Products NEMA IEC60529 Degrees of Protection Provided by Enclosures - IP Code Telcordia SR-332 Electronic Equipment Reliability Standard ASTM B117 Salt Spray Test Standard MIL-STD-810F Rain/Ice Test Standard CIE 115 2010 Lighting of Roads for Motor and Pedestrian Traffic Tested to Category 5 Hurricane winds (256kph/155mph) Underwriters Laboratories (UL) cULus marking is available on all products rated 120V-240V QPS (NRTL) - cQPSus mark is available on all products rated 120-240V, 277-480V NOM (Mexico) NOM mark is available on all products rated 120-240V, 277-347V
SAT-S Series (SAT-24S, SAT-48S)

Suitable for replacing conventional 70-150 watt HPS, MH or MV systems Available with 24 or 48 LEDs Drive currents: 280, 350, 450, 525, and 600 mA Input Voltages: Universal Driver 120 to 240 VAC (50Hz or 60Hz) 277V, 347V, 480V, and 12-24V DC drivers available upon request System Watts: 22-100 W (depending on model and drive current selected) Distribution Patterns: IES Type II, IES Type III, Euro wide, Euro narrow, ANZ Color Temperature (CCT): 5000K (standard), 4000K (optional), 4500K (optional)
Above: SAT-S fixture with Bronze finish (RAL 7022)
Above: SAT-S fixture with Black finish (RAL 9005) and optional wall bracket attached
SAT-M Series (SAT-72M, SAT-96M)

Suitable for replacing conventional 150-400 watt HPS, MH or MV systems Available with 72 or 96 LEDs Drive currents: 280, 350, 450, 525, and 600 mA Input Voltages: Universal Driver 120 to 240 VAC (50Hz or 60Hz) 277V, 347V, 480V, and 12-24V DC drivers available upon request System Watts: 65-200 W (depending on model and drive current selected) Distribution Patterns: IES Type II, IES Type III, Euro wide, Euro narrow, Euro long Color Temperature (CCT): 5000K (standard), 4000K (optional), 4500K (optional)
Above: SAT-L fixture with Black finish (RAL 9005)
Above: SAT-L fixture with Gray finish (RAL 7035)
10
Leading the LED technology wave SAT-L Series (SAT-120L, SAT-144L) Coming Soon
Suitable for replacing conventional 400-1000 watt HPS, MH or MV systems Available with 120 or 144 LEDs Drive currents: 280, 350, 450, 525, and 600 mA Input Voltages: Universal Driver 120 to 240 VAC (50Hz or 60Hz) 277V, 347V, 480V, and 12-24V DC drivers available upon request System Watts: 110-300 W (depending on model and drive current selected) Distribution Patterns: IES Type II, IES Type III Color Temperature (CCT): 5000K (standard), 4000K (optional), 4500K (optional)
The newest addition to the Satellite Series product line
Coming Soon!
SAT-L fixture with Gray finish (RAL 7035)
11
Product Specifications
SAT-24S (24 LEDs)

Electrical
Available Driver Currents Power Consumption*
Technical Specifications: SatelliteTM Series LED Roadway Luminaire

Performance / Photometrics
280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 22W 28W 36W 44W 50W Available Driver Currents Fixture Efficacy (Type II)* Fixture Output (Type II)* Telcordia MTBF (in Millions)** LED L70 @ 350mA Distribution 280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 86 Lm/W 84 Lm/W 81 LmW 77 Lm/W 72 Lm/W 1,900 Lm 2,350 Lm 2,900 Lm 3,400 Lm 3,600 Lm 3.3 hrs 2.9 hrs 2.5 hrs 2.2 hrs 2.1 hrs
Input Voltage: Universal Driver 120 to 240 VAC, 50Hz or 60Hz; 277V, 347V, 480V, and 12-24V DC drivers available upon request.
Fixture
Weight Width (maximum) Length (maximum) Height (maximum) EPA Cover Lens Housing Mounting 8.2 kg 382 mm 411 mm 167 mm < 0.047m2 Acrylic Single piece, die-cast aluminum 1.625 to 2.375/ 42 to 60 mm OD tenons 18 lb 15.0 in 16.2 in 6.57 in < 0.509 sq ft2
>100,000 hours IES Type II, IES Type III, European wide, European narrow Color Temperature (CCT) Standard 5,000 K Other colors available upon request Color Rendering Index (CRI) at 70 (+/-5%)
Operating Conditions
Temperature (ambient) -40C to +60C -40F to +140F
Photocell Options
Photocell Receptacle with shorting cap Photocell 20 yr design life option available No Photocell Receptacle - solid casting
Finish
Standard Painted Finish*
* E-coat primer with durable polyester powdercoat topcoat.
167mm (6.57 in)
411mm / 16.2 in
382mm / 15.0 in
Figure 1 Luminaire side profile***
Figure 2 Luminaire top***
Figure 3 Luminaire bottom***
* Values shown are average values and are subject to +/-5% tolerance ** Power supply MTBF values are based on independent labratory analysis using Telcordia SR-332. Values shown are in millions of hours. *** SAT-48S illustrated
LRL_SAT24S_SS_2012_01_23
12
SAT-48S (48 LEDs)

Electrical
280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 43W 55W 72W 88W 100W Available Driver Currents* 280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA Fixture Efficacy (Type II)* Fixture Output (Type II)* Telcordia MTBF (in Millions)** LED L70 @350mA Distribution 87 Lm/W 84 Lm/W 81 LmW 77 Lm/W 72 Lm/W 3,750 Lm 4,600 Lm 5,800 Lm 6,750 Lm 7,150 Lm 3.3 hrs 2.9 hrs 2.5 hrs 2.2 hrs 2.1 hrs
Fixture
Weight Width (maximum) Length (maximum) Height (maximum) EPA Cover Lens Housing Mounting 8.2 kg 382 mm 411 mm 167 mm < 0.047m
2
18 lb 15.0 in 16.2 in 6.57 in < 0.509 ft2
>100,000 hours IES Type II, IES Type III European wide, European narrow Color Temperature (CCT) Standard 5,000 K Other colors available upon request. Color Rendering Index (CRI) at 70 (+/-5%)
Acrylic Single piece, die-cast aluminum 1.625 to 2.375/ 42 to 60 mm OD tenons
Photocell Options
Photocell Receptacle with shorting cap Photocell 20 yr design life option available No Photocell Receptacle - solid casting
Finish
167mm (6.57 in)
411mm / 16.2 in
382mm / 15.0 in
* Values shown are average values and are subject to +/-5% tolerance ** Power supply MTBF values are based on independent labratory analysis using Telcordia SR-332. Values shown are in millions of hours. *** SAT-48S illustrated
LRL_SAT48S_SS_2012_01_23
13
SAT-72M (72 LEDs)

Electrical
Available Driver Currents Power Consumption* 65W
280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 83W 107W 131W 150W Available Driver Currents Fixture Efficacy (Type II)* Fixture Output (Type II)* Telcordia MTBF (in Millions)** LED L70 @350mA Distribution 280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 87 Lm/W 84 Lm/W 80 LmW 77 Lm/W 72 Lm/W 5,650 Lm 6,950 Lm 8,600 Lm 10,050 Lm 10,750 Lm 2.3 hrs 2.1 hrs 1.7 hrs 1.6 hrs 1.5 hrs
Fixture
Weight Width (maximum) Length (maximum) Height (maximum) EPA Cover Lens Housing Mounting 11.4 kg 350 mm 608 mm 156 mm 0.065 m
2
25 lb 13.8 in 23.9 in 6.14 in 0.699 ft2
>100,000 hours IES Type II, IES Type III European wide, European narrow, European Long Color Temperature (CCT) Standard 5,000 K Other colors available upon request. Color Rendering Index (CRI) at 70 (+/-5%)
Acrylic Single piece, die-cast aluminum 1.625 to 2.375/ 42 to 60 mm OD tenons
Photocell Options
Photocell Receptacle with shorting cap Photocell 20 yr design life option available No Photocell Receptacle solid casting
Finish
156mm (6.14 in)
608mm / 23.9 in
350mm / 13.8 in
* Values shown are average values and are subject to +/-5% tolerance ** Power supply MTBF values are based on independent labratory analysis using Telcordia SR-332. Values shown are in millions of hours. *** SAT-96M illustrated
LRL_SAT72_SS_2012_01_23
14
SAT-96M (96 LEDs)

Electrical
Available Driver Currents Power Consumption* 86W
280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 110W 143W 175W 200W Available Driver Currents Fixture Efficacy (Type II)* Fixture Output (Type II)* Telcordia MTBF (in Millions)** LED L70 @350mA Distribution Color Temperature (CCT) Color Rendering Index (CRI) at 70 (+/-5%) 280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 87 Lm/W 84 Lm/W 80 LmW 77 Lm/W 72 Lm/W 7,500 Lm 9,200 Lm 11,500 Lm 13,450 Lm 14,350 Lm 2.3 hrs 2.1 hrs 1.7 hrs 1.6 hrs 1.5 hrs >100,000 hours IES Type II, IES Type III European wide, European narrow, European Long Standard 5,000 K Other colors available upon request.
Fixture
Weight Width (maximum) Length (maximum) Height (maximum) Cover Lens Housing Mounting 11.4 kg 350 mm 608 mm 156 mm Acrylic Single piece, die-cast aluminum 1.625 to 2.375/ 42 to 60 mm OD tenons 25 lb 13.8 in 23.9 in 6.14 in 0.699 ft2
EPA 0.065m2
Photocell Options Finish

156mm (6.14 in)
608mm / 23.9 in
350mm / 13.8 in

* Values shown are average values and are subject to +/-5% tolerance ** Power supply MTBF values are based on independent labratory analysis using Telcordia SR-332. Values shown are in millions of hours. *** SAT-96M illustrated
LRL_SAT96_SS_2012_01_23
15
SAT-120L (120 LEDs)

Electrical
280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 110W 140W 180W 220W 250W Available Driver Currents 280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA Fixture Efficacy (Type II)* 85 Lm/W 83 Lm/W 80 LmW 76 Lm/W 71 Lm/W Fixture Output (Type II)* 9,350 Lm 11,620 Lm 14,400 Lm 16,720 Lm 17,750 Lm
Fixture
Weight Width (maximum) Length (maximum) Height (maximum) Cover Lens Housing Mounting 15.4 kg 458 mm 488 mm 206 mm Acrylic Single piece, die-cast aluminum 1.625 to 2.375/ 42 to 60 mm OD tenons 34 lb 18.0 in 19.2 in 8.1 in
Color Temperature (CCT)
Temperature (ambient)
Finish
IN G
458mm / 18.0 in
SO
Photocell Options
488mm (19.2 in)
O
-40C to +60C
Color Rendering Index (CRI) at 70 (+/-5%)
CO
* Values shown are average values and are subject to +/-5% tolerance *** SAT-144L illustrated
16
N
-40F to +140F
LED L70 @350mA Distribution
>100,000 hours IES Type II, IES Type III Standard 5,000 K
Other colors available upon request.
206mm (8.1 in)
LRL_SAT120L_SS_2012_03_28
SAT-144L (144 LEDs)

Electrical
280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA 132W 168W 216W 264W 300W Available Driver Currents 280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA Fixture Efficacy (Type II)* 85 Lm/W 83 Lm/W 80 LmW 76 Lm/W 71 Lm/W Fixture Output (Type II)* 11,200 Lm 13,950 Lm 17,250 Lm 20,050 Lm 21,300 Lm
Fixture
Weight Width (maximum) Length (maximum) Height (maximum) Cover Lens Housing Mounting 15.4 kg 458 mm 488 mm 206 mm Acrylic Single piece, die-cast aluminum 34 lb 18.0 in 19.2 in 8.1 in
Color Temperature (CCT)
Color Rendering Index (CRI) at 70 (+/-5%)
Temperature (ambient)
1.625 to 2.375/ 42 to 60 mm OD tenons
Finish
M IN G
458mm / 18.0 in
SO
Photocell Options
488mm (19.2 in)
O
-40C to +60C
CO
* Values shown are average values and are subject to +/-5% tolerance *** SAT-144L illustrated
17
N
-40F to +140F
LED L70 @350mA Distribution
>100,000 hours IES Type II, IES Type III Standard 5,000 K
Other colors available upon request.
206mm (8.1 in)
LRL_SAT144L_SS_2012_03_30
Catalog Numbering System: How to Order
SatelliteTM Series: SAT-S and SAT-M Catalog Numbering System / Shop Drawing Approval
MODEL SERIES
SAT Satellite
# OF LEDS/ BODY SIZE

24 S 48 S 72 M 96 M Small Small Medium Medium 0 6 7 8
VOLTAGE
120V-240V universal 277V-347V universal 480V 12V-24V DC (solar applications) R S
PHOTOCELL CONTROL*
c/w NEMA Photocell Receptacle Solid Casting (No Photocell Receptacle) T2 TW T3 EW EN EL AN
OPTICS
Type II Type II Wide Type III Euro Wide Euro Narrow Euro Long* ANZ** * Available on SAT-M only. ** Available on SAT-S only.
DRIVE CURRENT
280 350 450 525 600 280 mA 350 mA 450 mA 525 mA 600 mA
* Photocells and shorting caps ordered separately. See next page.
FINISH
GY BK BZ _ _ __ Gray (RAL 7035) Black (RAL 9005) Bronze (RAL 7022) 4 Digit RAL# (Custom Finish)
LED COLOR TEMPERATURE (CCT)

1 2 3 5000K (Standard/Default) 4500K (Optional) 4000K (Optional) A
LENS TYPE
Acrylic
CERTIFICATION
USA/Canada (QPS) (Standard/Default) CE European NM NOM-Mexico CT C-TICK (Australia) UL USA* NS
CONTROL OPTIONS
XX TBA
Other color temperatures available. Please contact factory for details.
10
* 120-240V only
11
Sample Catalog Number:
| Sat | 48S | 0 | R | T2 | 450 | GY | 1 | A | NS | XX |

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
SatelliteTM Series, 48 LEDs, small body fixture, 120V, c/w photocell receptacle, Type II distribution, 450mA drive current, gray painted finish, 5000K CCT, acrylic lens, CDN/US QPS certification.
Shop Drawing Approval/Sign-off

Project Name: Fixture Type: Quantity: Reviewed by: Catalog Number: Approved by: Comments:
Sat
(for custom color, insert 4 digit RAL here) Information provided is subject to change without notice.
LRL-SHOPDRAWING-SAT-2012-01-24 LRL-SHOPDRAWING WI081D-03
18
Photocell and Shorting Cap: Ordering Information

SHORTING CAPS DESCRIPTION
Low Profile One of the lowest profile shorting and non-shorting (open) caps in the Outdoor Lighting Control industry High Impact Thermoplastic Base UV-Stabilized Permanent Color, High Impact Resistant Polypropylene Cover Closed Cell Volara Sealing Gasket Creates weather seal, presents fixed service to l uminaire, and provides surge protection ANSI Certified
OPTIONS
SHORTING CAP GRAY 120-240V AC SHORTING CAP BLACK 120-240V AC SHORTING CAP GRAY 277-480V AC SHORTING CAP BLACK 277-480V AC
ORDER NUMBER
LRL65055-LF LRL65210-LF LRL65214-LF LRL65215-LF
CHECK WHICH PREFERRED
LOW VOLTAGE PHOTOCELLS
DESCRIPTION
Relay-assisted Triac (RAT) switching up to 1800VA, 1000W 320 Joule MOV IP67 Sealed enclosure UV Stabilized Acrylic Conical Cover
OPTIONS
PHOTOCELL 120-277V AC 10-15 SEC 16LUX 1:1.5 ON/OFF, BLUE, 20-YEAR, UPWARD SENSING PHOTOCELL 12-48V DC 3-5 SEC 15LUX 1:1.5 ON/OFF RATIO, GREEN, 7 YEAR, SIDE FACING
ORDER NUMBER
LRL65223-LF
LRL65349-LF
HIGH VOLTAGE PHOTOCELLS
DESCRIPTION
Double-Sided, Plated Through Circuit Board (DSPT) for durability and reliability Quad-Gate Technology for precision and consistency Full Wave Rectification Dual Zener Diodes 530 Joule MOV High Impact Thermoplastic Base Solid Brass Contact Blades UV Stabilized Permanent Color, High Impact Resistant Polypropylene Cover
OPTIONS
PHOTOCELL 480V 15LUX 3-5 SEC 1:1.5 ON/OFF, YELLOW, 20-YEAR, SIDE FACING PHOTOCELL 347V 15LUX 3-5 SEC 1:1.5 ON/OFF, GREEN, 20-YEAR, SIDE FACING
ORDER NUMBER
LRL65260-LF
LRL65261-LF
Information provided is subject to change without notice.
LRL-SHOPDRAWING-SAT-2012-01-24 LRL-SHOPDRAWING WI081D-03
19
Performance Specifications

1.0 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SATELLITETM SERIES FIXTURES
1.1 Power Supply Driver Specifications Power supply must have a 3rd party independently tested Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) Rating to international standard Telcordia SR-332 Manufacturer to provide projected failures per year per 10,000 lights based on reliability equation R = e-(time/MTBF) Minimum Mean Time Between Failure Ratings of the Following: SAT-M Series SAT-S Series i) 2,300,000 hours @ 280mA drive current i) 3,300,000 hours @ 280mA drive current ii) 1,400,000 hours @ 600mA drive current ii) 2,100,000 hours @ 600mA drive current Letter of certification from the manufacturer shall be provided which confirms that the following parts/processes are not included in the power supply driver i) Commercial-grade electrolytic capacitors ii) Potentiometers iii) Opto-couplers iv) Potting compounds Available in the following drive currents: 280mA, 350mA, 450mA, 525mA, and 600mA Rated for a minimum of 88,000 hours (approximately 20 years based on 12h/day on-time) All capacitors used must be aircraft grade and have a minimum life rating of 110,000 hours at 85C/185F Maximum 600 mA operating current RoHS compliant and lead free Surge protection devices compliant with ANSI standard C62.41-2002 Class C High (10kV, 10kA) Tested to IEC 61000-4-5 (6kV, 3kA), compliant with European Union CE requirements 1.2 LED Fixture Testing Standards - The LED fixtures shall comply with the following standards and specifications. Necessary testing shall be from an approved laboratory. Copies of qualifying reports shall be provided. ANSI C62.41 Surge Voltages in Low Voltage AC Power Circuits ANSI C136.10 Locking-type Photocontrol Devices and Mating Receptacles ANSI C136.15 Luminaire Field Identification ANSI C136.31 Roadway Luminaire Vibration ANSI C136.37 Solid State Light Sources Used in Roadway and Area Lighting ANSI C136.3 Roadway Luminaire Attachment - min. of +/- 3 tilt of luminaire about the tenon when mounting. IES/ANSI RP-8 American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting EN-61000-3-2 Harmonic Current Emissions IES LM-79-08 Electric and Photometric Measurements of Solid State Lighting Products IES LM-80-08 Measuring Lumen Maintenance of LED Light Sources NEMA IEC60529 Degrees of Protection Provided by Enclosures - IP Code Telcordia SR-332 Electronic Equipment Reliability Standard ASTM B117 Salt Spray Test Standard MIL-STD-810F Rain/Ice Test Standard CIE 115 2010 Lighting of Roads for Motor and Pedestrian Traffic Tested to Category 5 Hurricane winds (256kph/155mph) Underwriters Laboratories (UL) cULus marking is available on all products rated 120V-240V QPS (NRTL) - cQPSus mark is available on all products rated 120-240V, 277-480V NOM (Mexico) NOM mark is available on all products rated 120-240V, 277-347V 1.3 LED Specification LEDs shall be 5000K (500), with a minimum CRI of 65 LED LM-80 data shall demonstrate a lumen maintenance of 99% or greater at 55C/131F @ 6,000 hours with drive current testing at either 350mA, 700mA, or 1000mA LEDs shall be six (6) die chips; single die LEDs shall not be permitted 1.4 Fixture Housing Single-piece die cast aluminum alloy A360 housing Shall not contain extruded aluminum or inserts, and shall not have multiple pieces screwed, bolted, or fastened together by any other means Available in painted finish (E-coat primer with durable polyester powdercoat topcoat). 20

Mass no greater than 11.4 kg/25 lbs EPA no greater than 0.7 ft Area between heat sink fins shall be angled to achieve a self-cleaning design and to prevent debris build-up; horizontal or flat heat sinking systems shall not be acceptable due to the lack of self-cleaning design Terminal block compartment accessible via a single trigger-latch based tool-less entry system 1.5 Thermal Management System Heat sink fins to be integral with the single-piece cast body Heat sink system shall be passive. Systems relying on venting holes, grills, or slots shall not be permitted Light engine must consist of aluminum core circuit boards clad directly to the cast aluminum housing All LEDs shall have a maximum rated junction temperature (Tj) of 135C / 275F System shall maintain minimum LED junction temperatures as per the following table (ambient T=20C/68F):
Operating Current 280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA LED Tj (junction temperature) 42C/108F 47C/117F 55C/131F 63C/145F 69C/156F Degrees below LEDs maximum rated Tj (135C/275F is max junction temp) 93C/167F 88C/158F 80C/144F 72C/130F 66C/119F LED Max Rated Tj 135C/275F 135C/275F 135C/275F 135C/275F 135C/275F
1.6 Fixture Design and Performance Dark Sky compliant IP 66 Ingress Protection for both light engine chamber and power supply chamber Operating Temperature Range -40C to +60C/ -40F to +140F Adjustable Pole Mount Connection 1.625 to 2.375/ 42 to 60 mm O.D. Power terminals sized for #14 AWG to #6 AWG wire and accessible from underside of fixture IESNA Distributions - Type II and Type III Two independent LED light engines are to be angled at 30 to a horizontal roadway in order to maximize targeted lumen output (i.e. high throwing power) for maximum energy savings LEDs must be surface-mounted to light engine circuit board; no pin through-hole LEDs shall be permitted LED fixture minimum efficacy as per the following tables (5000K, 120 V):
LED Driver Operating Current 280mA 350mA 450mA 525mA 600mA LED Fixture Efficacy* 86 Lm/W 84 Lm/W 80 Lm/W 77 Lm/W 72 Lm/W
1.7 Manufacturing Facility - The LED fixture assembly/manufacturing facility shall have the following designations. Copies of recognized certifications shall be included with the proposal. ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems (submit copy of certificate) Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) certification by IPC for the light engine manufacturing facility and power supply manufacturing facility (submit copy of certificates) Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) flooring throughout production area of the light engine manufacturing facility and power supply manufacturing facility (submit photographs of production floor in both facilities) Nitrogen plumbed into soldering processes to improve quality yield (submit photographs of nitrogen tank in power supply and light engine manufacturing facilities) LEDs must be stored in moisture-proof cabinets prior to production (submit photographs of cabinets in the light engine manufacturing facilities) No less than five (5) years of experience in manufacturing LED-based lighting products All production staff in power supply, light engine, and fixture assembly facilities to be certified to IPC EDU 101 21
*Data based on a Type II distribution pattern.
Light Loss Factor Information
LRL SatelliteTM Series Light Loss Factor Determination

LLD = 0.89 Lamp Lumen Depreciation (LLD). The lumen depreciation (LLD) for the LED is determined from LM-80 [1] reported data provided by the LED manufacturer. The LM-80 report gives lumen depreciation data for LEDs operating at solder pad temperatures (Ts) of 55C, 85C, and 105C. In the Satellite Series fixtures the LEDs are operated well under the maximum drive current, as low as 280mA. In-situ temperature measurement tests (ISTMTs), performed as per UL 1598 [2] and Energy Star [3], confirm that the difference between ambient (Tamb) and solder pad temperature (Ts) is 17.9C at 280mA. For an ambient temperature of 20C and an operating current of 280mA Ts will be 37.9C The low Ts is achieved through our unique thermal management system with cooling fins integrated into the fixture housing. The fixtures curved design is self-cleaning, preventing the buildup of dirt and debris which could adversely affect heat dissipation. Using the methodology of TM-21 [4], an exponential curve fit to the LM-80 depreciation data and the Arrhenius Equation are used to interpolate lumen maintenance at the operating temperatures seen in the Satellite Series. This yields the lumen depreciation factors for the LEDs . For an average ambient of 20C and an operating current of 280mA, LLD = 0.89 over 20 years (12 operating hours per day). LOD = 0.94 Luminaire Optical Depreciation (LOD). Satellite Series luminaires are IP-66 rated. This means they are impervious to dust and powerful water spray. The optical lenses are mounted at 30 angles on the underside of the fixture meaning they are protected from the elements. In extreme conditions, winds may deposit some slight dust onto the fixtures lenses, but the mounting angles make these lenses self-cleaning. The lenses are made of UV resistant acrylic which does not discolor. Under the most extreme laboratory testing conditions, this material will optically depreciate by no more than 6% over 20 years based on manufacturer information.
Light Loss Factor Determination 2012-03-20
22

EF=1.00 Equipment Factor. Our in-house designed power supply has been manufactured using high-temperature rated, vibration resistant, high reliability components. The power supply has been designed to provide constant current to the LEDs over the 20 year life under normal conditions. LLF = 0.89 x 0.94 x 1.00 = 0.83 Using this methodology total fixture Light Loss Factor (LLF) can be calculated for all Satellite Series LED Drive Currents as shown in the graph below.
Figure 1 Satellite Series LED Fixture LLF for varying drive current at an ambient temperature of 20C. Representative curves for 10, 15 and 20 years of operation are shown.
23

REFERENCES 1. Illuminating Engineering Society, Lighting Measurement (LM)-80, Approved Method: Measuring Lumen Maintenance of LED Light Sources. 2008. 2. Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 1598 Luminaires. 3rd Edition, 17 September 2008 3. ENERGY STAR Manufacturers Guide for Qualifying Solid State Lighting Luminaires Version 2.1, http:// www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/manuf_res/downloads/ENERGYSTAR_Manufacturers_Guide_v2.1.pdf 4. 4. Illuminating Engineering Society, Technical Memorandum (TM)-21, Projecting Long Term Lumen Maintenance of LED Light Sources. 2011.
24
Equivalency Tables
High Pressure Sodium (HPS) to LED Equivalency Table

High Pressure Sodium (HPS)
HPS Fixture (Bulb Wattage) 50W 70W 100W 150W 200W 250W 400W HPS Plug Wattage (Actual Fixture Consumption) 68 95 135 195 245 295 465
LED Roadway Lighting (LRL)

Equivalent LRL Product SAT24S-350 mA SAT24S-525 mA SAT48S-350 mA SAT48S-600 mA SAT72M-450 mA SAT96M-450 mA SAT96M-600 mA LRL Plug Wattage Energy Savings (Actual Fixture Consumption) LRL over HPS 28 44 55 101 110 145 201 59% 54% 59% 48% 55% 51% 57%
Note: This table provides suggested replacements for HPS wattages based on LED Roadway Lightings experiences with end clients and lighting layouts. It is the ultimate responsibility of the end client to confirm suitability for their applications, and not the responsibility of LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.
25
Metal Halide to LED fixture Equivalency Table

METAL HALIDE (MH)
MH Fixture (Bulb Wattage) 70W 100W 175W 250W 400W MH Plug Wattage (Actual Fixture Consumption) 98 122 208 290 459

Equivalent LRL Product SAT24S-350 mA SAT48S-280 mA SAT48S-450 mA SAT96M-350 mA SAT96M-525 mA LRL Plug Wattage Energy Savings (Actual Fixture Consumption) LRL over MH 28 43 71.8 110 174 71% 65% 65% 62% 62%
Note: This table provides suggested replacements for MH wattages based on LED Roadway Lightings experiences with end clients and lighting layouts. It is the ultimate responsibility of the end client to confirm suitability for their applications, and not the responsibility of LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.
26
Mercury Vapour to LED fixture Equivalency Table

MERCURY VAPOR (MV)
MV Fixture (Bulb Wattage) 100W 125W 175W 250W 400W MV Plug Wattage (Actual Fixture Consumption) 118 137 195 285 450

Equivalent LRL Product SAT24S-280 mA SAT24S-350 mA SAT24S-525 mA SAT48S-525 mA SAT96M-450 mA LRL Plug Wattage Energy Savings (Actual Fixture Consumption) LRL over MH 22 28 44 87.7 148 81% 80% 77% 69% 67%
Note: This table provides suggested replacements for MV wattages based on LED Roadway Lightings experiences with end clients and lighting layouts. It is the ultimate responsibility of the end client to confirm suitability for their applications, and not the responsibility of LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.
27
Brackets and Accessories
SatelliteTM Series:
Brackets & Adapters

LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. (LRL) offers a wide range of standard and custom brackets and adapters to satisfy most mounting conditions. Our range includes pole-top brackets in a variety of configurations (single, double, or quad tenon with various arm lengths), as well as adjustable adapters that can be used in a wide variety of applications. All brackets and adapters can be painted to match fixture and/or pole color.
Pole-Top Brackets (varying arm lengths are available ~ consult factory)

Single Tenon Bracket Double Tenon Bracket Double Tenon 90 Bracket
Triple Tenon Bracket
Quad Tenon Bracket
28
Brackets & Adapters:
Application Examples
Single Tenon Bracket
Double Tenon Bracket
Quad Tenon Bracket
Adjustable and Other Brackets and Adapters Available:
Contact us with your mounting requirements and we will provide a solution that best meets your needs.
LRL Brackets and Adapters - 2011-06-12 - EN
29
SAT-S Wall Mount Bracket

Specifications
Construction Material Cast Aluminum 356
3.5/90mm Diameter 3.5/ 90mm 6.5/165mm
Mounting Holes 4 holes: 5/16 inch / 0.794 cm diameter Weight 2.45 kg (5.39 lbs) Finish Standard Painted Finish* Mounting Hardware
* E-Coat primer with durable polyester powdercoat topcoat.
Not included
6.61/ 168mm
3.1/ 78mm
15.0/381mm
6.22/ 158mm
Wall Mount Bracket
16.2/411mm Figure 1 Luminaire SAT-S (bottom) with Wall Mount Bracket Figure 2 Luminaire SAT-S illustrated (side) with Wall Mount Bracket
How to Order: Catalog Numbering System

DESCRIPTION
sat-s wall bracket with 3/16 edpm gasket aluminum a356.1 sat-s wall bracket with 3/16 edpm gasket aluminum a356.1 sat-s wall bracket with 3/16 edpm gasket aluminum a356.1
FINISH
BZ BRONZE GY GRAY BK BLACK
CATALOG NUMBER
lrl 65317-01-lf lrl 65318-01-lf lrl 65319-01-lf
LRL_SAT24S_Wall_Bracket_2012_03_05
30
Installation Instructions
CAUTION RISK OF SHOCK DISCONNECT POWER BEFORE SERVICING Leading the LED DANGER technology RISQUE DEwave CHOC METTRE HORS TENSION AVANT LINSTALLATION PELIGRO RIESGO DE SHOCK O DESCARGA ELECTRICA DESCONECTAR LA ENERGIA ANTES DE HACER LA INSTALACION PERIGO RISCO DE CHOQUE DESLIGUE A ELETRICIDADE ANTES DA INSTALAO. ACHTUNG STROMSCHLAGGEFAHR UNTERBRECHEN SIE DIE STROMZUFUHR VOR DER INSTALLATION
!
EN
SATELLITETM SERIES INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
PT
IMPORTANT: Read carefully before installing fixture. GENERAL: Upon receipt of fixture thoroughly inspect for any damage. SAFETY: This fixture must be wired in accordance with the National Electrical Code, National Electrical Safety Code and applicable local codes and ordinances. Proper grounding is required to ensure personal safety. Overload circuit protection is recommended. MIN 75C SUPPLY CONDUCTORS. All work should be done by a qualified electrician. No serviceable parts beyond main wiring chamber. ATTENTION: See the electrical specifications on the product label.
FR
INSTRUES DE INSTALAO DE LUMINRIAS DA SRIE SATELLITETM
LAMPADAIRES LED INSTRUCTIONS DINSTALLATION DE LA SRIE SATELLITETM
IMPORTANTE: Leia com ateno antes de instalar luminrias. Instrues gerais: Ao receber a luminria, inspecione-a cuidadosamente, para verificar se o produto sofreu algum dano. Segurana: Esta luminria deve ligada fiao eltrica de acordo com o Cdigo Eltrico Nacional, com o Cdigo Nacional de Segurana Eltrica e com os cdigos e normas locais aplicveis. Aterramento adequado necessrio para garantir a segurana de pessoas. Tambm se recomenda o uso de proteo contra sobrecargas no circuito. Todo o trabalho deve ser executado por um eletricista profissional qualificado. No tem peas reparveis fora da cmara principal de fiao. ADVERTNCIA: Veja as especificaes eltricas na etiqueta do produto.
IMPORTANT: Lire attentivement avant dinstaller le lampadaire Gnral: rception du lampadaire, linspecter soigneusement pour viter tout dommage. Scurit: Ce lampadaire doit tre branch conformment au Code national de llectricit, au National Electrical Safety Code (Code national de scurit lectrique aux .-U.) et aux autres codes et ordonnances locaux en vigueur. Une mise la terre approprie est requise pour garantir la scurit du personnel. Une protection de circuit en cas de surcharge est recommande. FIL DALIMENTATION 75C MIN. Tous les travaux doivent tre effectus par un lectricien qualifi. Il ny a pas des pices remplaables lextrieur de la chambre principal des connexions. ATTENTION : Voir les caractristiques lectriques sur ltiquette du produit.
DE
SATELLITETM SERIE EINBAUANLEITUNG
WICHTIG: Sorgfltig lesen, bevor Sie die Lichtanlage Allgemein: Untersuchen Sie die Leuchtanlage nach Erhalt sorgfltig auf Schden. Sicherheit: Diese Beleuchtungsanlage muss entsprechend des National Electrical Code, des National Electrical Safety Code und anzuwendenden lokalen Vorschriften und Verordnungen verkabelt werden. Eine korrekte Erdung ist fr die persnliche Sicherheit erforderlich. Ein berspannungsschutz wird empfohlen. Jegliche Arbeiten sollten von einem qualifizierten Elektriker durchgefhrt werden. Es gibt auerhalb der Schaltkastens keine zu wartenden Teile. ACHTUNG: Entnehmen Sie die elektrischen Kenngren dem Produktetikett.
ES
INSTRUCCIONES DE INSTALACION DE LA SERIE SATELLITETM
EN
IMPORTANTE: Leer cuidadosamente antes de instalar la luminaria. General: Al recibir la luminaria, inspeccionar minuciosamente para ver si presenta algn dao. Seguridad: Esta luminaria debe ser cableada de acuerdo al Cdigo Nacional Elctrico (National Electrical Code, National Electrical Safety) Cdigos y disposiciones locales aplicables. Se requiere que quede debidamente aterrizada para asegurar la seguridad personal. Se recomienda proteccin de sobrecarga en los circuitos. Todo este trabajo deber ser efectuado por un electricista calificado. No hay piezas reparables fuera de la cmara principal del cableado. ATENCION: Ver las especificaciones elctricas en la etiqueta del producto.
Doc #: LRL65102-15-LF
FR
ES
PT
DE
ORIENTATION: For optimum light distriX bution, install fixture parallel to the road. ** ORIENTATION: Pour une rpartition optimale de lclairage, installer le lampadaire paralllement la route. ** ORIENTACION: Para una ptima distribucin de la luz, instalar la luminaria paralela al camino. ORIENTAO: Para obter a distribuio ideal da luz, instale a luminria paralelamente via. ** AUSRICHTUNG: Um eine optimale Lichtausbeute zu erhalten, installieren Sie die Beleuchtung parallel zur Strae. **
LED ROADWAY LIGHTING LTD.
Date: 2011-09-12
Authors: A. Chaffey, T.R. Laan
31
Open electrical compartment door by releasing latch. Ouvrir la porte du compartiment lectrique en librant le loquet. ES Abrir la puerta del compartimiento elctrico soltanLeading the LED technology wave do el pestillo o cerrojo.
EN FR
PT DE
Abra a porta do compartimento eltrico soltando a trava. ffnen Sie den Elektrobereich durch Lsen des Verschlussriegels.
EN
FR
ES
Loosen pole clamp bolts (4 places with 9/16 hex head) sufficiently to allow insertion of 1.66 outside diameter (42mm) or 2.375 outside diameter (60mm) pole arm as needed. Desserrer les boulons du manchon pour poteau (4 vis tte hexagonale de 9/16 po) suffisamment pour permettre linsertion dun poteau de 1,66 po diam. ext. (42mm) ou 2,375 po diam. ext. (60 mm) au besoin. Aflojar los pernos sujetadores del poste (en 4 ubicaciones con cabeza hexagonal de 9/16) lo suficiente como para permitir la insercin del brazo del poste de 1.66 (42mm) de dimetro exterior o de 2.375 (60 mm) de dimetro. If using barrier shield, remove inner circle of shield to mount on a pole arm greater than 1.66 outside diameter (42mm). En cas doption de protection, retirer le cercle intrieur de la protection du poteau pour monter le poteau de 2,375 po diam. ext. Si se est utilizando la opcin con barrera protectora o de aislamiento, remover el crculo interior de la barrera protectora o de aislamiento del poste para montar un brazo de poste de 2.375 (60mm) de dimetro exterior. Slide fixture onto the pole, ensuring the pole barrier shield is not displaced. Faire glisser le lampadaire sur le poteau en vrifiant que la protection ne soit pas dplace. Deslizar la luminaria en el poste, asegurndose de que la barrera protectora o de aislamiento no sea desplazada.
PT
DE
Afrouxe os parafusos do fixador (4 parafusos sextavados 9/16 pol.) o suficiente para permitir a insero de brao de poste com dimetro externo de 1,66 pol. (42 mm) ou 2,375 pol. (60 mm), conforme a necessidade. Lsen Sie die Schrauben der Polklemmen (4 Stck mit 9/16 Sechskant) so weit, dass Sie einen Mastarm mit 1.66 (42 mm) Auendurchmesser oder 2,375 (60 mm) Auendurchmesser bei Bedarf zu einfhren knnen.
EN
PT
FR
DE
ES
Se optar por usar barreira de proteo, remova o crculo interno da vedao do poste para montar um brao de poste com dimetro externo de 2,375 pol. (60 mm). Wenn Sie die Variante mit Abdeckungsschild verwenden, entfernen Sie den inneren Ring des Mastschutzschilds, um einen Mastarm mit 1.66 (42 mm) Auendurchmesser anzuflanschen.
EN
PT
FR
DE
ES
Faa com que a luminria deslize ao longo do poste, certificando-se que a barreira de proteo no saia do lugar. Schieben Sie die Beleuchtungseinheit auf den Mast; stellen Sie dabei sicher, dass der Mastschutzschild nicht versetzt ist.
EN
FR
ES
With the fixture approximately level, tighten bolts until clamps are snug against the pole. Une fois le lampadaire peu prs niveau, resserrer les boulons jusqu ce que les crampons de serrage soient appliqus sur le poteau. Con la luminaria aproximadamente nivelada, apretar los pernos sujetadores hasta que queden apretados contra el poste.
PT
DE
Com a luminria aproximadamente nivelada, aperte os parafusos at que as garras estejam fixadas no poste. Die Vorrichtung ungefhr in Waage halten, dann die Schrauben anziehen, bis die Klammern fest am Mast ansitzen.
32
TO ADJUST FIXTURE TILT: (A) If no further adjustment to fixture tilt is needed, set fixture to desired rotation about the pole then proceed to Step 7. (B) To lift the fixture nose at an upward tilt, loosen the two front bolts then tighten the two back bolts closest to the pole entry. (C) To lower the fixture Leading the LED technology wave nose at a downward tilt, loosen the two back bolts closest to the pole entry and then tighten the two front bolts. Back Bolts Front Bolts FR POUR RGLER LINCLINAISON DU LUMINAIRE: (A) Si linclinaison du luminaire na besoin daucun autre rglage, fixez le luminaire langle de rotation souhait sur 6B le poteau, puis passez ltape 7. (B) Pour donner une inclinaison vers le haut lappareil dclairage, dsserrez les deux boulons avant et resserrez les deux boulons prs de lentre du poteau. (C) Pour donner une inclinaison vers le Tighten Loosen bas lappareil dclairage, dsserrez les deux boulons prs Back Bolts Front Bolts de lentre du poteau et resserrez les deux boulons avant. ES PARA AJUSTAR LA INCLINACION DE LA LUMINARIA: (A) Si ya no se requiere ms ajuste a la inclinacin de la 6C luminaria, fijar la luminaria en la rotacin deseada alrededor del poste y luego proceder al Paso 7. (B) Para levantar la punta de la luminaria con una inclinacin hacia arriba, aflojar los dos tornillos del frente y luego apretar los dos torLoosen Tighten nillos posteriores cercanos a la entrada del poste. (C) Para Back Bolts Front Bolts bajar la punta de la luminaria con una inclinacin hacia abajo, aflojar los dos tornillos posteriores cercanos a la en-
6A
Pole Arm
EN
PT
DE
trada del poste y luego apretar los dos tornillos del frente. PARA AJUSTAR A INCLINAO DA LUMINRIA: (A) Se no houver necessidade de mais nenhum ajuste, fixe a luminria ao poste, girando at atingir a posio desejada, e prossiga para a Etapa 7. (B) Para inclinar a ponta da luminria para cima, solte os dois parafusos frontais e aperte os dois parafusos posteriores mais perto da entrada do poste. (C) Para inclinar a ponta da luminria para baixo, solte os dois parafusos posteriores mais perto da entrada do poste e aperte os dois parafusos frontais. WIE MAN DIE NEIGUNG DER BELEUCHTUNGSEINHEIT JUSTIERT: (A) Falls keine weitere Ausrichtung der Neigung der Beleuchtungseinheit erforderlich ist, drehen Sie die Anlage in die gewnschte Position zum Mast und fahren dann mit Schritt 7 fort. (B) Um die Nase der Anlage zu einem Aufwrtswinkel anzuheben, lsen Sie die zwei vorderen Schrauben und ziehen dann die zwei hinteren fest, die der Mastarmhalterung am nchsten liegen. (C) Um die Nase der Anlage zu einem Abwrtswinkel zu senken, lsen Sie die zwei hinteren Schrauben, die am nchsten zur Mastarmhalterung sitzen und ziehen dann die zwei vorderen Schrauben fest. Assim que a luminria estiver nivelada, aperte todos os parafusos de fixao com torque de 21,724,4 Nm (6-18 ps/libras). Wenn die Anlage dann die gewnschte Neigung hat, ziehen Sie alle Schrauben der Mastklammern auf 16 - 18 ft - lb (21,7 24,4 Nm) fest.
EN
FR
ES
Once fixture is set to desired tilt, tighten all pole clamp bolts to 16-18 ft-lb (21.7 24.4 Nm). Une fois le lampadaire niveau, serer tous les boulons du manchon pour Poteau de 16 18 pi-lb. (21,7 24,4 Nm). Una vez que la luminaria est nivelada, apretar todos los pernos sujetadores del poste a una torsin de 16-18 libras-pie (21.7-24.4 Nm). FOR AC INPUT: Route AC mains cable through strain relief; tie wrap should loop through only one side of the plastic mount. Attach AC wires to the terminal block; L1: Line (Hot) lead; N/L2: Neutral lead or Second Line lead. It is essential that proper polarity is observed or the fixture may be damaged. Attach Ground/Protective Earth lead to the ground lug. Secure leads with tie wrap to 40 lb (178 N). A minimum 9mm outside diameter entry cable is recommended. ALIMENTATION CA: Tirer les cbles CA principaux au moyen dun serre-cble; lattache autobloquante doit faire une boucle dans une seule partie de la fixation de plastique. Fixer les cbles CA au bornier; L1 : fil actif; N/L2 : fil neutre ou seconde ligne active. Il est essentiel de respecter la polarit au risque dendommager le lampadaire. Fixer le fil de terre la borne de mise la terre. Fixer le lampadaire avec une attache autobloquante 40 lb. (178 N). Un cble dalimentation de 9 mm diam. ext. est recommand. PARA ENTRADA DE CA: Tender los cables principales de CA libres de tensin; la banda de sujecin deber enlazarse a travs de slo un lado del montaje plstico. Conectar los cables de CA al bloque terminal; L1: Lnea conductora (Caliente); N/L2: Conductor neutro o Segunda Lnea conductora. Es esencial que se observe una adecuada polaridad o la luminaria podra
PT
DE
8A
EN
PT
FR
DE
ES
daarse. Conectar el conductor de Tierra/Protector a la terminal de tierra. Asegurar los cables con banda de sujecin a 40 lbs (178 N). Se recomienda una entrada de cable de 9mm de Dimetro Exterior mnimo. PARA ENTRADA DE CA: Passe a fiao eltrica pelo aliviador de tenso. A abraadeira (tie-wrap) deve passar por somente um lado do suporte plstico. Conecte a fiao de CA ao bloco do terminal; L1: Fase; N/ L2: Neutro ou segunda fase. essencial observar a polaridade correta para evitar danos luminria. Conecte o fio terra ao borne de aterramento. Prenda os fios com abraadeira (tie-wrap) com resistncia trao de 18 Kgf (40 libras = 178 N). O dimetro externo mnimo recomendado para a fiao de 9mm. Fr Wechselstrom-Eingang: Fhren Sie das Netzkabel fr Wechselstrom durch die Zugentlastung; Kabelbinder sollte nur durch eine Seite der Plastikhalterung gefhrt werden. Befestigen Sie die Wechselstromkabel an der Verteilerleiste; L1: Leiter (stromfhrend); N/L2: Nullleiter oder zweite Ader. Es ist wichtig, dass auf die korrekte Polaritt geachtet wird, da die Vorrichtung sonst beschdigt werden knnte. Verbinden Sie das Erdungskabel mit dem Bodenanschlussstck. Sichern Sie das Kabel mittels Kabelbinder mit 40 lb (178 N). Ein Eingangskabel mit mindestens 9 mm Durchmesser wird angeraten.
33
FOR DC INPUT: Route DC input cable through strain relief; tie wrap should loop through only one side of the plastic mount. Attach DC wires to the terminal block; (+) Positive lead; (-) Negative lead. It is essential that proper polarity is observed or the Leading the LED technology wave fixture may be damaged. Attach Ground/ Earth lead to the ground lug. Secure leads with tie wrap to 40 lb (178 N). A minimum 9mm outside diameter entry cable is recommended. FR ALIMENTATION CC: Tirer les cbles CC principaux au moyen dun serre-cble; lattache autobloquante doit faire une boucle dans une seule partie de la fixation de plastique. Fixer les cbles CC au bornier; (+) fil positif; (-) fil ngatif. Il est essentiel de respecter la polarit au risque dendommager le lampadaire. Fixer le fil de terre la borne de mise la terre. Fixer le lampadaire avec une attache autobloquante 40 lb. (178 N). Un cble dalimentation de 9 mm diam. ext. est recommand. ES PARA ENTRADA DE CC: Tender el cable de entrada libre de tensin; la banda de sujecin deber enlazarse a travs de slo un lado del montaje plstico. Conectar los cables CC al bloque terminal; (+) conductor Positivo; (-) conductor Negativo. Es esencial observar una adecuada polaridad o la luminaria podra daarse. Conectar el cable de tierra a la ter-
8B
EN
PT
DE
minal de tierra. Asegurar los cables con una banda de sujecin a 40 lbs (178 N). Se recomienda una entrada de cable de 9mm de dimetro exterior mnimo. PARA SADA DE CC: Passe a fiao de CC pelo aliviador de tenso. A abraadeira (tie-wrap) deve passar por somente um lado do suporte plstico. Conecte a fiao de CC ao bloco do terminal; (+) Fase positiva; (-) Fase negativa. essencial observar a polaridade correta para evitar danos luminria. Conecte o fio terra ao borne de aterramento. Prenda os fios com abraadeira (tie-wrap) com resistncia trao de 18 Kgf (40 libras = 178 N). O dimetro externo mnimo recomendado para a fiao de 9mm. Fr Gleichstrom-Eingang: Fhren Sie das Netzkabel fr Gleichstrom durch die Zugentlastung; Kabelbinder sollte nur durch eine Seite der Plastikhalterung gefhrt werden. Befestigen Sie die Gleichstromkabel an der Verteilerleiste; (+) Pluskabel; (-) Minuskabel. Es ist wichtig, dass auf die korrekte Polaritt geachtet wird, da die Vorrichtung sonst beschdigt werden knnte. Verbinden Sie das Erdungskabel mit dem Bodenanschlussstck. Sichern Sie das Kabel mittels Kabelbinder mit 40 lb (178 N). Ein Eingangskabel mit mindestens 9 mm Durchmesser wird angeraten.
EN
FR
ES
Close electrical compartment door, ensure latch is fully closed. Fermer la porte du compartiment lectrique en vrifiant que le loquet est compltement referm. Cerrar la puerta del compartimiento elctrico, asegurarse de que el cerrojo o pestillo quede bien cerrado.
PT
DE
Feche o compartimento eltrico e certifique-se que a trava esteja firme. Schlieen Sie die Klappe der Elektroeinheit, stellen Sie sicher, dass der Verschlussriegel vollstndig eingerastet ist.
10
EN
FR
ES
Install photocontrol or shorting plug (If applicable). To maintain fixture certification, these items must contain electrical certification appropriate for the installation region (eg. UL/CSA-listed in North America; CE certified in Europe). Installer la fiche de photocontrle/court-circuit. Pour conserver la certification du lampadaire, ces lments doivent tre conformes la certification en lectricit de la rgion o il est install (par ex., certification CSAUL en Amrique du Nord; certification CE en Europe). Instalar enchufe de fotocontrol o de corto circuito. Para mantener la certificacin de la luminaria, estas piezas deben contener una adecuada certificacin elctrica para la regin en donde se est haciendo la instalacin (por ejemplo, enlistadas en UL/CSA en Norteamrica; certificacin CE en Europa).
PT
DE
Instale o controle fotoeltrico ou plugue de curtocircuito. Para manter a certificao da luminria, esses itens devem ter a certificao eltrica adequada para a regio onde sero instalados (p. ex.: UL/CSA, na Amrica do Norte; CE, na Europa). Installieren Sie die Fotokontrolle oder einen Kurzschlussstecker (Sofern anwendbar). Um die Zulassung der Beleuchtungseinheit zu erhalten, mssen diese Teile eine elektrische Zertifizierung fr die Region, in der sie installiert werden, besitzen (z. B. UL/CSAzertifiziert in Nord Amerika; CE-zertifiziert in Europa).
34
EN FR ES
SatelliteTM Series LED Luminaire Information Information sur les Lampadaires LED de la Srie SatelliteTM Informacin de Luminaria LED de la Serie SatelliteTM
PT DE
Informaes sobre as luminrias LED da srie SatelliteTM SatelliteTM Serie LED Beleuchtung Datenblatt
SAT-72M / SAT-96M 11.4 kg (25 lb) 608 mm (23.9 in) 350 mm (13.8 in) 156 mm (6.14 in) 0.065 m2 (0.699 ft2) +60C (+140 F) 21.7 24.4 Nm (16 18 ft-lb) 178 N (40 lb) Ground = up to #2 AWG (33 mm2) Others = up to #6 AWG (13 mm2) SAT-72M / SAT-96M 11,4 kg (25 lb.) 608 mm (23,9 po) 350 mm (13,8 po) 156 mm (6,14 po) 0,065 m2 (0,699 pi2) +60C (+140 F) 21,7 24,4 Nm (16 18 pi-lb.) 178 N (40 lb.) Terre = jusqua 13 mm2 (6 AWG) Autres = jusqua 13 mm2 (6 AWG) SAT-72M / SAT-96M 11.4 kg (25 lbs) 608 mm (23.9) 350 mm (13.8) 156 mm (6.14) 0.065 m2 (0.699 pies2) +60C (+140 F) 21.7 24.4 Nm (16 18 libras-pie) 178 N (40 lbs) Tierra = hasta 13 mm2 (6 AWG) Otros = hasta 13 mm2 (6 AWG) SAT-72M / SAT-96M 11,4 kg (25 libras) 608 mm (23,9 pol.) 350 mm (13,8 pol.) 156 mm (6,14 pol.) 0,065 m2 (0,0699 p quad.) +60C (+140F) 21,7 24,4 Nm (16-18 ps/libras) 178 N (40 libras) Aterramento = at 33 mm2 (2 AWG) Outros = at 13 mm2 (6 AWG) SAT-72M / SAT-96M 11,4 kg (25 lb) 608 mm (23,9 in) 350 mm (13,8 in) 156 mm (6,14 in) 0.065 m2 (0,699 ft2) +60C (+140 F) 21,7 24,4 Nm (16 18 ftlb) 178 N (40 lb)

ENGLISH Weight Length Width Height Effective Projected Area (EPA) Max. Ambient Temperature (Ta)* Recommended Torque Setting for mounting bolts Recommended Force to secure strain relief Acceptable Supply Wire Sizes
franCais Poids Longeur Largeur Hauteur Zone de Projection Relle Temprature ambient max. (ta)* Couple recommand pour les boulons de fixation Force recommande pour fixer le serre-cble Taille acceptable pour les fils dalimentation ESPAOL Peso Largo Ancho Altura Area Proyectada Efectiva Mx. Temperatura Ambiente (ta) Torsin Recomendada para pernos de montaje Fuerza Recomendada para asegurar sin demasiada tensin Tamano aceptable para las lineas de alimentacion PORTUGUESE Peso Comprimento Largura +60C (+140F) Altura rea projetada efetiva Temperatura ambiente (Ta) mxima Torque recomendado para os parafusos de montagem Fora recomendada para fixao do aliviador de tenso Dimensionamento aceitvel da fiao
SAT-24S / SAT-48S 8.2 kg (18 lb) 411 mm (16.2 in) 382 mm (15.0 in) 167 mm (6.57 in) 0.047 m2 (0.509 ft2) +60C (+140 F) 21.7 24.4 Nm (16 18 ft-lb) 178 N (40 lb) Ground = up to #2 AWG (33 mm2) Others = up to #6 AWG (13 mm2) SAT-24S / SAT-48S 8.2 kg (18 lb.) 411 mm (16,2 po) 382 mm (15,0 po) 167 mm (6,57 po) 0,047 m2 (0,509 pi2) +60C (+140 F) 21,7 24,4 Nm (16 18 pi-lb.) 178 N (40 lb.) Terre = jusqua 13 mm2 (6 AWG) Autres = jusqua 13 mm2 (6 AWG) SAT-24S / SAT-48S 8.2 kg (18 lbs) 411 mm (16.2) 382 mm (15.0) 167 mm (6.57) 0.047 m2 (0.509 pies2) +60C (+140 F) 21.7 24.4 Nm (16 18 libras-pie) 178 N (40 lbs) Tierra = hasta 13 mm2 (6 AWG) Otros = hasta 13 mm2 (6 AWG) SAT-24S / SAT-48S
8,2 kg (18 libras) 411 mm (16,2 pol.) 382 mm (15,0 pol.) 167 mm (6,57 pol.) 0,047 m2 (0,509 p quad.) +60C (+140F) 21,7 24,4 Nm (16-18 ps/libras) 178 N (40 libras) Aterramento = at 33 mm2 (2 AWG) Outros = at 13 mm2 (6 AWG) DEUTSCH SAT-24S / SAT-48S Gewicht 8,2 kg (18 lb) Lnge 411 mm (16,2 in) Breite 382 mm (15,0 in) Hhe 167 mm (6,57 in) Effektiv beleuchteter Bereich 0.047 m2 (0,509 ft2) Max. Umgebungstemperatur (Ta) +60C (+140 F) Empfohlene Drehmomenteinstellung zum Anziehen der Schrauben 21,7 24,4 Nm (16 18 ftlb) Empfohlene Kraft zur Sicherstellung der Zugentlastung 178 N (40 lb)
* UL-listed models are rated to max. ambient temperature of 50C. * Les modles lists par lUL sont certifis pour fonctionner une temprature maximale ambiante de 50C.
35
EN
Ingress Protection The SatelliteTM Series luminaire is designed to be protected from the effects of the outside environment. The power supply and optics compartments are designed to be impervious to dust and powerful water spray, and carry an IP66 protection rating. The primary service compartment for installation of the mounting pole and electrical connections carries an IP20 protection rating. Photobiological Safety NOTICE: UV emitted from this product at 4.23 m (13.9ft) is 0.001 W/m2 (EN/IEC 62471 Exempt level).
FR
Protection de pntration Les lampadaires de la srie SatelliteTM sont conus pour tre protgs des effets de lenvironnement extrieur. Les compartiments dalimentation et doptique sont conus pour tre tanches la poussire et aux vaporisateurs deau puissants et comporte un indice de protection IP66. Le compartiment de service principal dinstallation du poteau de fixation et des branchements lectriques a un indice de protection IP20. Scurit photobiologique ATTENTION: le rayonnement ultraviolet mis par ce produit 4,23 m (13,9 pi) est de 0,001 W/m2 (niveau dexemption de la norme EN/CEI 62471).
ES
Clasificacin de Proteccin Las luminarias de la Serie SatelliteTM estn diseadas para estar protegidas de los efectos del medio ambiente exterior. Los compartimientos de la fuente de poder y de los elementos pticos estn diseados para ser impermeables al polvo y a fuertes chorros de agua y tienen una clasificacin de proteccin IP66. El compartimiento de servicio primario para la instalacin del poste de montaje y las conexiones elctricas tiene una clasificacin de proteccin IP20. Seguridad Fotobiolgica AVISO: La emisin de UV de este producto a 4.23 mts. (13.9 pies) es de 0.001 W/m2 (nivel Exento para EN/IEC 62471)
PT
Vedao A srie de luminrias SatelliteTM foi projetada para se manter protegida contra os efeitos do ambiente que as cerca. Os compartimentos de suprimento de energia e tico so projetados para impermeabilidade poeira e pulverizao de gua, com grau de proteo IP66. O compartimento principal para a instalao do poste e conexes eltricas tem grau de proteo IP20. Segurana fotobiolgica ADVERTNCIA: A emisso de raios UV por este produto, a 4,23 m (13,9 ps), de 0,001W/m2 (nvel isento de acordo com a norma EN/IEC 62471).
DE
Schutzvorrichtung Die Beleuchtungsanlagen der SatelliteTM Serie wurde so entwickelt, dass sie den von auen einwirkenden Einflssen widerstehen. Die Stromzufuhr und das Optikfach wurden so entwickelt, dass sie gegenber Staub und Spritzwasser unempfindlich sind und ber die IP66-Schutzklasse verfgen. Das Hauptwartungsfach fr die Installation auf den Montagearm und die elektrischen Verbindungen verfgen ber eine IP20-Schutzklasse. Photobiologische Sicherheit HINWEIS: Die UV-Abstrahlung dieses Erzeugnisses betrgt 0,001 W/m2 (IEC/EN 62471 ,Schwellwert) bei 4,23 m (13,9 ft.)
** Max rotation angle less than 10 to the horizontal. ** Ajustement de langle de moins de 10 par rapport lhorizontale. ** No incline la luminaria ms que 10. ** No incline a luminria mais do que 10. ** Der maximale Neigungswinkel betrgt weniger als 10 von der Horizontalen.
115 Chain Lake Drive Bayers Lake Business Park Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3S 1B3 Canada
Toll-Free Tel: +1 (877) 533.5755 Toll-Free Fax: +1 (888) 533.5755 Email: info@ledroadwaylighting.com Web: www.ledroadwaylighting.com
36
Case Studies and Application Examples
SatelliteTM Series: Bridge Applications

LED Roadways (LRL) SatelliteTM Series fixtures are ideal for bridge applications. Roadway lighting installations on bridges present significant maintenance challenges, and our 20 year design life fixtures are an ideal match for this application. In addition to the maintenance savings, our SatelliteTM Series fixtures provide up to 80% energy savings versus traditional High Pressure Sodium and Metal Halide fixtures. LRL has provided fixtures to a number of bridge projects, including Confederation Bridge (Prince Edward Island, Canada); Briton Bridge (United Kingdom); Hill Avenue Bridge (Tennessee, USA); Centennial Bridge (Miramichi, New Brunswick, Canada) and Harbour Bridge (Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada). LRLs testing program includes the following tests, which are particularly relevant for bridge applications: ANSI C136.31 Roadway Luminaire Vibration (100,000 cycles at bridge or overpass frequency (5Hz-30Hz); 3G rating), ASTM B117 Salt Spray Test, MIL-STD-810F Rain/Ice Test.
Confederation Bridge (Borden, Prince Edward Island/Cape Jourimain, New Brunswick, Canada) The Confederation Bridge joining Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick is perhaps the most extreme environment on earth. The bridge environment includes a marine (salt) environment, salt spray, ice, snow, wind and extreme vibration. After an extensive series of trials, 315 LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. fixtures were selected for the installation.
Centennial Bridge (Miramichi, New Brunswick, Canada) Miramichis arch truss Centennial Bridge was opened in 1967, to commemorate Canadas centennial year. We installed 22 LED Roadway Satellite fixtures for an energy savings of 56%.
Briton Ferry Bridge (United Kingdom) The South Wales Trunk Road Agency (SWTRA), on behalf of the Welsh Assembly Government, have installed 62 LED Roadway Satellite fixtures on the A48 (Trunk Road) Briton Ferry Bridge.
37
CONVERSION CASE STUDY: City Mazda Dealership

Before: 10 x 1000W Metal Halide Fixtures (1080 plug watt) After: 10 x 201W SatelliteTM Series Fixtures (201 plug watt)
81% Energy Savings

Project Description
The City Mazda dealership in Halifax, Canada recently converted their exterior showcase lighting from 1000 Watt metal halide shoebox fixtures to 201 Watt LED Satellite Series fixtures. This retrofit resulted in a reduction of energy consumption by 81%. Also, by installing the Satellite Series fixtures, City Mazda will reduce their maintenance costs almost entirely. With the previous 1000 Watt metal halide fixtures, maintenance events (re-lamping and ballast replacement) occurred three times annually. The energy savings, which is more important than ever due to the increasing cost of electricity, combined with the reduction in maintenance costs, results in a total Return on Investment of 2.8 years. Over the 20 year life of the Satellite Series, the total savings are expected to be approximately $140,000. The dealership is very pleased with the lighting performance especially the increased uniformity on the ground, less light pollution on the neighbouring properties and into the sky. Also, there is an enhanced level of lighting on the main City Mazda dealership sign. We are very happy with the light levels produced by the LED lighting. With a return on investment of less than 2.8 years, I highly recommend LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. and the Satellite Series fixture for commercial applications. ~Stephen Scarff, Owner, City Mazda Halifax, N.S., Canada
10 Fixture Comparative 1000W MH
201W SAT-96 @ 600mA
20 Year Lifecycle Cost Savings ~ $139,534*

SAT-96-600 mA
Total Fixture Wattage 1080W 201W 20 Year Energy Usage 946,080 kWh 176,076 kWh Initial Fixture Cost * $8,500 $12,603 20 Year Energy Cost ** $156,489 $29,124 20 Year Maintenance Cost *** $16,541 $268 20 Year Lifecycle Cost $181,530 $41,996
Using LRLs SAT-96 over the MH fixture

20 Year Lifecycle Cost Savings $139,534
Environmental Benefits
GHG (CO2) Reduction Over 20 years Mercury Eliminated Over 20 years Barrels of Crude Oil not consumed over 20 years 600 tonnes 655 mg 1240 Barrels
* All currency amounts are in US Funds. ** Based on $0.10/kWh @ 12 hours per day. *** Based on $200/MH @ 50 replacements vs. $209/LRL @ 1 driver replacements (@ 5% inflation). Mazda is a registered trademark of Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda Case Study 2011-10-28
38
CASE STUDY: Ron Bouchards Auto Stores - Nissan & Honda
New Installation: 45 x 201W SAT-96M SatelliteTM Series fixtures (201 Plug Watts) 46 x 151W SAT-72M SatelliteTM Series fixtures (151 Plug Watts)
61% Energy Savings

Project Description
Former NASCAR driver and New England Auto Racers Hall of Fame inductee, Ron Bouchard knows his automobiles. Ron Bouchards Auto Stores (Nissan & Honda) located in Lancaster, Massachusetts, USA, recently benefitted from a combination installation of 201W and 151W LED Satellite Series fixtures. The 10.5 acre lot can accommodate 900 cars and in the future may be expanded to 15 acres to accommodate 1100 cars. We are very pleased with the lighting performance resulting from installing 91 Satellite Series LED light fixtures from LED Roadway Lighting at our new auto dealership complex. When we first became interested in LED lighting we compared the Satellite Series against the standard 400W Metal Halide lighting system. Benefits such as 61% energy savings, little to no maintenance for 20 years, improved light color and uniformity and a project payback of just over 2 years made the choice an easy one. I would highly recommend the Satellite Series for any commercial application. ~ Ron Bouchard, Auto Stores - Nissan & Honda Lancaster, Massachusetts, USA
Key Statistics (LED vs. 400W Metal Halide)

20 Year Total Lifecycle Cost Savings ~ $646,108
Total Energy Reduction 61%
Asset Payback 2.3 Years* Annual Energy Savings $18,530* Annual Energy Savings (kWh) Total Energy Savings and Maintenance Costs over 20 years Total Energy Savings over 20 years 109,000 kWh $646,108 2.18 million kWh
Greenhouse Gas Reduction over 20 years 1,704 tonnes Total # of Luminaires 91
* Asset Payback is based on capital payback above the cost of Installing a 400W Metal Halide system. Re-lamp cost of $42 is based on $125/hour for boom truck use and 20 minutes per fixture to change each lamp. Re-lamp schedule is 4 years. Energy cost $0.170 kWh. Inflation Rate (multiplier) is 5% (annual). Payback period includes energy efficient lighting rebate provided by local utility. Contact your local utility for availability of similar rebates in your area.
39
Fixture Conversion Comparison (SAT-S 24 & 48 LEDs) 68% Energy Savings

The SatelliteTM Series SAT-S (small body fixture) offers superior performance and advantages that the competition cannot match. Designed to achieve up to 80% energy savings over HPS, the SAT-S fixture provides the same superior energy savings and low maintenance costs as our SAT-M (medium body fixture). The only difference you will see is a smaller fixture that costs you less. In addition to sharing the same fixture design with the SAT-M, the small body fixture offers all of the same competitive advantages: Electronics & Long Life Reliability: LED Roadway Lighting fixture boasts a 20 year design life. With an MTBF rating of up to 3,302,411 hours, the SAT-S is designed to be maintenance free. Optics: LRLs targeted optics system lands light exactly where you need it on the roads, sidewalks and parking lots. LRLs fixture is designed to meet IES RP-8, CIE, BSI light level guidelines and is Dark Sky approved. Thermal Management: Heat rapidly transfers away from the LEDs and power supply through the aluminum core circuit board which is fixed directly to the one-piece die cast housing dissipating heat quickly through fin based technology. Ease of Installation: SatelliteTM Series luminaires seamlessly swap one-for-one with existing fixtures to mount on existing poles and brackets. No new training or special tools are required. Vertical Integration: LRL researches, designs, and manufactures all of their fixtures in-house. By doing this they ensure consistent quality in all processes and product testing. Lifecycle Costing: By designing a maintenance free fixture that can deliver up to 80% energy savings, LRLs lifecycle costing is unparalleled. (See 10,000 Fixture Conversion Comparison)
US Dollars
10,000 Fixture Conversion Comparison 20 Year Lifecycle Cost Savings ~ $22,054,957*

Comparative
Initial Fixture Cost 20 Year Energy Cost ** 20 Year Maintenance Cost ***
100W HPS (137W)

$ 1,500,000 $19,850,976 $12,405,620 $33,756,596
SAT-48 (44W)
$ 5,250,000 $ 6,375,496 $ 76,143 $11,701,639
Total 20 Year Lifecycle Cost
Using LRLs SAT-48 over the 100W HPS fixture

Total 20 Year Lifecycle Cost Savings
* All currency amounts are in US funds. ** Based on $0.10/kWh @ 12 hours per day.
$22,054,957
*** Based on $150/HPS @ 50,000 replacements vs. $209/LRL @ 262 replacements (@ 5% inflation).
Total Lifecycle Cost $33,756,596

Fixture Cost, Existing $1,500,000
Maintenance, Existing $12,405,620
Controls, Dimming and Solar/Wind available.
Total Lifecycle Cost $11,701,639

Energy, Existing $19,850,976 Fixture Cost, LRL $5,250,000 Maintenance, LRL $76,143 Energy, LRL $6,375,496
40
Conversion Case Study: South Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Before: 32 x 100W High Pressure Sodium Fixtures (137 plug watt) After: 32 x 44W SAT-48 LED Fixtures (44 plug watt)
Before
(Meets RP-8)
137W 100W HPS Bulbs
(Meets RP-8)
After
44W SAT-48 @ 280mA
68% Energy Savings

Project Description LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.s (LRL) SatelliteTM Series fixtures were installed in the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM), Nova Scotia as part of a 285 fixture pilot project. In this installation the SAT-48 LEDs replaced 32 100W (137 plug watt) HPS lights. The conversion illustrated to HRM that if they were to convert their existing street lights to the LRL SatelliteTM Series that they could substantially reduce their energy costs and life cycle costs. HRM is now in the process of converting 2,137 of their existing fixtures to LRL fixtures.
LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. is making it possible for our city to cut our lighting infrastructure spending by up to 66% over the next 20 years. As well as saving money, these fixtures will play a vital role in our continuing efforts to make HRM one of the greenest cities in North America. ~ Mayor Peter Kelly
20 Year Lifecycle Cost Savings ~ $70,576*

32 Fixture Comparative
Initial Fixture Cost 20 Year Energy Usage 20 Year Energy Cost ** 20 Year Maintenance Cost ***
100W HPS (137W)

$150 384,038 kWh $63,523 $39,698 $108,021
SAT-48 (44W)
$525 123,340 kWh $20,401 $292 $37,445
20 Year Lifecycle Cost
Using LRLs SAT-48 over the 100W HPS fixture

20 Year Lifecycle Cost Savings
$70,576
Environmental Benefits
20 Year Carbon Reduction Barrels of Crude Oil not consumed over 20 years 203 tons 442 Barrels
* All currency amounts are in US Funds. ** Based on $0.10/kWh @ 12 hours per day. *** Based on $150/HPS @ 160 replacements vs. $209/LRL @ 1 replacement (@ 5% inflation).
SAT-S Comparison Case Study (US) 2011-10-28
41
Asker, Akershus, Norway
BEFORE
AFTER
70%
ENERGY SAVINGS
Mercury Vapour | 125 Watt Lamp | 155 Plug Watts
SAT-48 (48 LEDS) - 280 mA | 44 Plug Watts
42
Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico
BEFORE
AFTER
55%
ENERGY SAVINGS
High Pressure Sodium | 150 Watt Lamp | 195 Plug Watts
SAT-48S (48 LEDS) - 525 mA | 88 Watts
43
Av. Bernardino de Campos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
BEFORE
AFTER
41%
ENERGY SAVINGS
SAT-96 (96 LEDS) - 525 mA | 175 Watts
44
Canso Causeway, Nova Scotia, Canada
BEFORE
AFTER
77%
ENERGY SAVINGS
SAT-48S (48 LEDS) - 280 mA | 43 Watts
45
56%
ENERGY SAVINGS
Armdale Rotary, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada SAT-96M (96 LEDS) - 280 mA - T3 | 86 Watts
46
35%
ENERGY SAVINGS
Grote Street, Adelaide City Council, Australia SAT-96M (96 LEDS) - 600 mA | 200 Watts | EU Long Optics
47
Sparwood, British Columbia, Canada SAT-24S (24 LEDS) - 350 mA | 28 Watts
48
Financing Program
Municipalities face increasing challenges in the current economic climate. Balancing a relatively finite revenue stream against increasing wave cost of services that are Leading the LEDthe technology demanded by constituents is a complex task. Municipalities are concerned about the state of public infrastructure, but are left with few feasible alternatives to deliver the services required at a manageable cost. In many cases, this also means that installation of energy saving equipment that will pay significant dividends in the future is postponed, thereby losing the potential savings over the long term because of current economic constraints. In the case of public lighting systems, many municipalities have considered removing or disabling street lighting assets, which raises concerns about public safety. There has to be another way.
The Challenge
Capital Lease Solutions
A Capital Lease is usually structured with a required nominal end of lease payment. At the end of the term of the lease, the title to the equipment is transferred to the lessee upon completion of the lease obligations. Such a lease must be shown as an asset on the balance sheet of the lessee and be depreciated or capitalized over the term of the lease. A major benefit of a Capital Lease is the lease provides additional financing options to the lessee. Unlike a traditional equipment finance loan, in many cases a Capital Lease can provide for 100% equipment financing.
Operating Lease Solutions
The Opportunity
The cost of a street lighting system is a significant portion of municipal energy budgets, in some cases, in excess of 50%. The cost of electricity is not the only factor. Maintenance costs also represent a sizable portion of the cost of managing a street lighting system. LED-based street lighting is a proven technology, with demonstrated energy savings and a life expectancy of four to five times that of conventional technologies such as high-pressure sodium. LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.s (LRL) Satellite Series fixtures deliver up to 80% energy savings and offer a 20 year design life. Our purpose-built power supply is designed for reliability, using aerospace and automotive components, as opposed to off-the-shelf, commercial grade components used in competing brands. The combination of a robust design, a proprietary optics system that delivers maximum illumination to the road surface, and unparalleled thermal management, make the Satellite Series the ideal choice for municipalities seeking reliability, longevity and maximum savings in energy and maintenance.
In a traditional operating lease the lessor makes a significant investment in the equipment, thereby assuming the risk of obsolescence, which reduces the lease payments that the lessee is required to make. Equipment under an operating lease need not be shown on the balance sheet of the lessee. In addition to the offbalance sheet benefits to the lessee, an operating lease provides flexibility through the many options available to the lessee at the middle and end of the lease.
About LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.
The Solution: LRL Global Finance Solutions
LRL Global Finance Solutions provides municipal and other end users of street and area lighting assets with a financing program that features competitive rates and flexible programs. Our team will assess your fixture inventory, work with you to determine requirements and put together a comprehensive plan which includes lighting layouts, energy savings, return on investment and environmental benefits reports, and a financing plan. The end result is the ability to take advantage of the many cost saving benefits of LED street lighting now, within a manageable cost structure.
49 62
LED Roadway Lighting Ltd (LRL) is a leading designer and manufacturer of LED (light-emitting diode) based street and area lighting fixtures and control systems. LRL is headquartered in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, with a 55,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Amherst. LRL also has manufacturing capabilities in the US (North Carolina) and the UK (Wales). LRL offers a complete range of LED based street and area lighting fixtures that meet or exceed IES (Illuminating Engineering Society), CIE (Commission Internationale de LEclairage) and IDA (International Dark Sky Association) requirements. LRLs products are RoHS compliant (free of lead and mercury), provide energy savings of up to 80% and substantially reduced maintenance costs. Our Streetlight Intelligence division, with operations in Halifax and Victoria, British Columbia, offers a complete suite of integrated, wireless, adaptive lighting controls for street and area lighting applications. LRL currently has municipal, utility, and commercial clients in more than 25 countries.
Leasing and Operating Cost Examples (vs. High Pressure Sodium)

HPS (High Pressure Sodium) - 150 WATTS | 193 Plug watts
COST PER YEAR
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4 $168.41 $117.43 $40.98 $10.00
YEAR 5 $175.51 $123.30 $42.21 $10.00
YEAR 6 $182.94 $129.47 $43.47 $10.00
YEAR 7 $190.72 $135.94 $44.78 $10.00
YEAR 8 $198.86 $142.74 $46.12 $10.00
YEAR 9 YEAR 10 YEAR 11 YEAR 12 YEAR 13 YEAR 14 YEAR 15 $207.38 $149.87 $47.50 $10.00 $216.30 $157.37 $48.93 $10.00 $225.63 $165.24 $50.40 $10.00 $235.41 $173.50 $51.91 $10.00 $245.64 $182.17 $53.47 $10.00 $256.35 $191.28 $55.07 $10.00 $267.57 $200.85 $56.72 $10.00
$148.94 $155.14 $161.62 TOTAL $101.44 $106.51 $111.84 ENERGY MAINTENANCE $37.50 $38.63 $39.78 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 CAPITAL
LRL - REGULAR OPERATION (LEASING OPERATIONAL COST) - SATELLITETM SERIES (SAT-48S-450mA-72W)
COST PER YEAR
YEAR 1 $113.75 TOTAL $37.84 ENERGY $0.31 MAINTENANCE FINANCING COSTS $75.60
YEAR 2 $115.65 $39.74 $0.32 $75.60
YEAR 3 $117.65 $41.72 $0.33 $75.60
YEAR 4 $119.74 $43.81 $0.34 $75.60
YEAR 5 $121.94 $46.00 $0.35 $75.60
YEAR 6
YEAR 7
YEAR 8
YEAR 9 YEAR 10 YEAR 11 YEAR 12 YEAR 13 YEAR 14 YEAR 15
$92.33 $94.76 $97.31 $99.98 $102.79 $62.06 $65.15 $68.40 $71.81 $75.39 $48.30 $50.71 $53.25 $55.91 $58.71 $61.64 $64.72 $67.96 $71.36 $74.93 $0.36 $0.37 $0.38 $0.39 $0.40 $0.41 $0.43 $0.44 $0.45 $0.46 $43.68 $43.68 $43.68 $43.68 $43.68 $$$$$-
LED ROADWAY LIGHTING SAVINGS OVER 15 YEARS = $1617.71 PER FIXTURE

YEAR 1 $35.19 YEAR 2 $39.49 YEAR 3 $43.97 YEAR 4 $48.67 YEAR 5 $53.57 YEAR 6 $90.61 YEAR 7 $95.96 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 YEAR 11 YEAR 12 YEAR 13 YEAR 14 YEAR 15 $101.55 $107.40 $113.51 $163.57 $170.26 $177.24 $184.54 $192.18
Notes and Assumptions

ENERGY 5% Annual Cost Increase Operation time - 12 hours/day - 365 Days / year Energy Rate = $0.12 kWh Maintenance 3% Annual Inflation Maintenance HPS (Includes Labour + Parts) - $150/ 4 Years Maintenance LRL (Includes Labour + Parts) - ~$6.00 / 15 Years (Using Telcordia SR-332 Electronics Reliability Testing) Financing Financing rates will be determined at time of negotiation. Based on 10 Year Lease with option of buyout after 1st term 5 Years (50% Residual) If buyout is declined, rate will be re-negotiated for 2nd Term.
Lease rates reflect the lessors current cost of funds and are subject to change either upwards or downwards, at any time, as market rates change.
50
LED Roadway Lighting Ltd products have been installed by municipalities, utilities and other end users in more than Leading the LED technology wave 25 countries. A few examples are shown below:
BEFORE
AFTER
Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico
Armdale Rotary, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Centennial Bridge. Miramichi, New Brunswick, Canada
BEFORE
AFTER
Northwest Arm Drive, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Asker, Akershus, Norway
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Phone: + 1 (877) 533.5755 Email: financing@ledroadwaylighting.com www. ledroadwaylighting.com/financing
51
LRL Global Finance Solutions Brochure-2012-01-23-EN
Learn more about how your community can achieve energy savings of up to 80%, substantial maintenance savings, improved light levels, and also discover the benefits of wireless adaptive lighting controls.
Adaptive Lighting Streetlight IntelligenceTM
Introducing Wireless Command & Control for Leading the LED technology wave Street & Area Lighting
BENEFITS OF ADAPTIVE LIGHTING CONTROLS

MH (metal halide) and MV (mercury vapor) lighting systems. Energy savings of up to 90% (depending on lighting technology employed) Centralized asset management and control GPS-based command and control System includes dimming capability, fixture outage reporting, and energy consumption measurement Field programmable using hand-held interface
Control system is compatible with LED, HPS (high pressure sodium),
SLI-Promo 2011-12-14-EN
52
Purpose Built Network

LEGEND GSM Cell Phone Modem 900 Mhz RF Mesh Network
Asset Management System with Internet-based Management Software

Works with 250-500 fixture controllers (depending on geography)
Communication Gateway
(retrofitted to existing fixture head or installed with new head)
Fixture Node
(retrofitted to existing lamp head or installed with new head)
Fixture Node
(retrofitted to existing fixture head or installed with new head)
Fixture Node
SLI-Promo 2011-12-14-EN
53

STREETLIGHT INTELLIGENCE CONTROL SYSTEM STANDARD SPECIFICATION 1.1 Capabilities / Features 1.1.1 System - Dimming feature available in HPS and LED 1.1.2 System - Gradual dimming of 1% dimming per 1.5 seconds (i.e. 30% = 45 seconds) 1.1.3 System - LED dimming range of 100% to 20%, HPS Range 100% to 50% 1.1.4 System - Power monitoring 1.1.5 System - Power measurement accuracy to within 1% 1.1.6 System - RF communications of 900MHz Spread Spectrum 1.1.7 System Error/failure reporting 1.1.8 System - Tracks light source run time in seconds 1.1.9 System - Dimming based on weekly schedule plus timed events 1.1.10 System - GPS based astronomical dusk-dawn schedules 1.1.11 System - Dimming increments of 1% with a time resolution of 15 minutes 1.1.12 System - Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum radios hop in unison through 50 frequency bins 1.1.13 System Handheld GPS field location data collected exportable in Microsoft Excel format for import into other GIS systems. 1.1.14 Controller 56 bit DES data message encryption (Controller to Gateway RF Communication) 1.1.15 Controller - HPS Anti-Cycling Detection and Non-Start Detection 1.1.16 Controller In-field programmability with handheld 1.1.17 Controller Battery back-up Real Time Clock - data retention for 10 years w/o power 1.1.18 Controller - Ambient sensor for on/off Option Available 1.1.19 Gateway SSL connection using TCP/IP sockets with 256-bit AES encryption (Gateway to Central Databases via internet) 1.1.20 Gateway - GPRS/GSM as well as CDMA modems available for most major providers, as well as connection to a local LAN via Ethernet RJ45 connection 1.2 Operational Specification 1.2.1 Controller + Gateway - IP 66 rated 1.2.2 Controller + Gateway - Ambient temperature range -40C to +60C 1.2.3 Controller + Gateway - Humidity rating of unlimited except above 40C less than 90% 1.3 Electrical Specification 1.3.1 Controller - HPS input voltage range 110V-480VAC 1.3.2 Controller - LED input voltage range 120-277V standard, 347-480V optional 1.3.3 Controller - Average quiescent power consumption 1.5W 1.3.4 Gateway Input voltage 120-240VAC 50/60Hz 1.3.5 Gateway Average power consumption of 20W 1.3.6 Controller + Gateway CSA compliant 1.3.7 Controller + Gateway FCC/IES compliant
Streetlight Intelligence Control System Specifications 2012-04-17
54
Streetlight IntelligenceTM: Street & Area Lighting Control and Monitoring

Q1. How much can a luminaire be dimmed (%)? A1. LED fixtures can be dimmed from 100% to 15%, as well as OFF. HPS/MH fixtures can be dimmed from 100% to 50%, as well as OFF. Q2. How long does dimming take? A2. Dimming is done in 1% increments, with an average time of 1.5 seconds per increment, ie. it would take 38 seconds to dim from 100% to 75%. Q3. A3. Is the dimming schedule set to weekly, monthly, etc and can we plan special days in advance (e.g. for a special event/holiday celebration, can we plan for that a few months using a special dimming schedule? Schedules are weekly, repeating 52 times per year. In order to plan for a special day/event, you would need to change the scheduling 2-3 days in advance of the special event to ensure all the fixtures were re-programmed. After the special day/event, you would then need to change the schedule back to the original schedule.
Q4. What are the smallest increments of dimming and time that we can scheduled? A4. The Streetlight Intelligence (SLI) system can dim in increments of 1% with 15 minute resolution in time. Q5. What is the accuracy and resolution of the power monitoring? A5. Better than 1% non-revenue-grade reporting, with a resolution of watt-seconds (Ws). Q6. Does dimming have any impact on the power factor or harmonic distortion? A6. In HPS systems, there is a slightly leading affect on the power factor (usually beneficial). In LED systems, it depends on the behaviour of the driver. Q7. Does dimming have any impact on the color of the light output? A7. With LED systems, it depends on the behavior of the driver. For HPS, there is a small shift. Q8. What are the electrical specifications? A8. HPS/MH 110-480VAC, 60Hz 0-400W, CWA/CWI Ballast only, LED systems: 110-277VAC, 50/60Hz up to 4.5A switched. Provides 0-10VDC output. Q9. What radio frequency is used and what is its range? A9. SLI uses a proprietary 900MHz Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) radio with a self-healing mesh network. Conservatively we recommend a maximum of 300 meters (984 feet) between any two Nodes/Gateway. Q10. How much data is typically sent/received by each Node? A10. The amount of data sent/received is very small, typically only a few hundred bytes during each 24 hour period. Typically, this is only done once per night to ensure all the Nodes are powered. The frequency of collection can be user-adjusted. Q11. Can the RF Mesh Network be shared with other devices? (e.g. traffic signals, video camera, pumps etc. A11. No, the RF Mesh Network uses a low bandwidth, proprietary protocol.
55

Q12. Is the data between nodes, and between nodes, and Gateway, secure? A12. The data uses a proprietary protocol and is encrypted with a 56 bit DES software encryption key. The transmitter and receiver must have the same key in order to decrypt the message packet. Q13. What is Gateway/Station? A13. Gateway/Station provides a 2-way gateway between our proprietary 900MHz network, and the Central Asset Management Database. Each gateway contains a single board computer, proprietary 900MHz transceiver and an Ethernet port to connect a cellular data modem, or an existing LAN. Q14. How is data back hauled from Gateway/Station? A14. Data is backhauled through the internet via either a cellular data modem or an existing LAN network via a standard RJ45 Ethernet connection. Q15. Is the data between Gateway and the Central Asset Management database secured? A15. The data is sent via a SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) connection between Gateway/Station and the Central Asset Management Database using TCP/IP sockets with 256-bit AES encryption. The transmitter and receiver must have the same private keys in order to secure a connection and transmit the compressed data. Q16. How many Nodes can be assigned to a Gateway/Station? A16. Conservatively, up to 500. The terrain and lighting layout can impact this number. Q17. What is the Central Asset Management software? A17. Central Asset Management software is hosted at LRL (LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.) in Canada. Users access the database through a web-based interface that allows users to set lighting parameters, set dimming schedules, generate reports and monitor asset (fixture) maintenance. Different users can be assigned rights which limit view/editing of the data. Q18. Is the interface between the Central Asset Management software and local computer secure? A18. The data is sent over a secure HTTPS connection between Central database and the local computer. Q19. What web browsers are supported? A19. Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 running Silverlight on Windows 7 and Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP. Other browsers are not supported but should work. Q20. What mapping source is used? A20. We use the latest version of Microsoft Bing Maps. Q21. Will client hosting be available? A21. Yes, a client-hosted option is planned for a future release. Q22. Is energy reporting in real time? A22. Data is typically collected once per night when it is guaranteed that all the nodes are operating. Depending on the reporting method (noon to noon or midnight to midnight), there can be a 24 hour delay in the energy measurement.
56

Q23. What reporting is available? A23. Currently, Energy and Maintenance reports are available. LRL would entertain working with a client to design custom reports for a fee. Q24. How do I know that a fixture is out? A24. Data is typically collected once per night when it is guaranteed that all the nodes are operating. Users would receive an email indicating that an error was detected during the previous 24 hour period. Using the Central Asset Management, you would view the errors in the Maintenance window. Q25. What is Commander? A25. Commander is a field ruggedized computer running Windows Mobile. Commander has both a built in GPS receiver and barcode scanner. Commander synchronizes with the Central Asset Management database providing installation and maintenance directions to field personnel. Using the GPS location and the barcode scanner, Commander records a Node barcode to a specific GPS location and uploads this information to the Central database. All maintenance is done using Commander to ensure the integrity of the data in the database. Q26. Can a Node be added to luminaire at factory? A26. Yes Q27. Can I order an LED fixture that is control-enabled from the factory and install controls at a later date? A27. Yes Q28. Can SLI technology be used with non-LRL fixtures? A28. Yes Q29. Can the SLI software manage (dimming, reporting) fixtures that are controlled using another manufacturers control hardware? A29. No, while the SLI system can be installed on other fixture brands (and therefore controlled/monitored), the SLI software cannot be used to control fixtures that are enabled with another brand of control hardware.
57
Installation List
Installations in Nova Scotia

Amherst Annapolis Royal Antigonish Arichat Bedford Berwick Bridgewater Canso Chester Cornwallis Dartmouth Department of Transportation DND Dockyard Halifax Regional Municipality Halifax Harbourwalk Halifax Port Authority Hammonds Plains Kejimkujik National Park Kentville Lakeside Industrial Park Lantz Louisburg Lockeport Lunenburg Mahone Bay Maitland Bridge Membertou New Glasgow Parrsboro Port Hawkesbury Port of Halifax Rossway Shelburne Springhill Sydney Truro Vantage Point Business Centre, Halifax Wolfville Yarmouth
Installations in Canada
Acheson, AB Bathurst, NB BC Hydro, BC Bishops Falls, NL Blind River, ON Borden, PEI Burnaby, BC Campbellton, NB Centennial Bridge, NB Central Huron Clinton, ON CFB Wainwright, AB Charlottetown, PEI Chatham-Kent, ON Confederation Bridge, NB/PEI Deerfield Village-Kitchener, ON Delta, BC Denwood, AB Department of National Defence, AB Dieppe, NB Duberville, ON Drumheller, AB Edmonton, AB Etobicoke, ON Elgin, ON Fergus, ON Fort St. John, BC Fredericton, NB Geraldton, ON Goderich, ON Gods Lake Reserve, MB Halton Hills, ON Hamilton, ON Humber College, ON Ingersoll, ON Inland Ferry Terminals, BC Invermere, BC Kapuskasing, ON Kenora, ON Kingsville, ON London, ON Moncton, NB Mount Pearl, NL MTO Junction - Calstock, ON NB Power Newfoundland Hydro, NL North Bay, ON North Perth, ON Paradise, NL Oakville, ON Ottawa, ON Perth-Andover, NB Port Coquitlam, BC Prince Albert, SK Princeville, QC Prudhomme, SK Qualicum Beach, BC Rankin Inlet, NU Red Deer, AB Red Lake, ON Regina, SK Richmond, BC Rycroft, AB Saint John Bridge, NB Saint John, NB Salmon Arm, BC Sarnia, ON Sault Ste. Marie, ON Saskatoon, SK Saugeen Shores, Port Elgin, ON Tilsonburg, ON Shippagan, NB Sparwood, BC St. Anthony, NL St. Jean sur Richelieu, QC St. Johns Int. Airport, NL St. Johns, NL St-Augustin de Desmaures, QC St-Georges-De-Beauce,QC Stratford, ON Sudbury, ON Summerside, PEI Surrey, BC Sussex, NB Tecumseh, ON Thedford, ON Thunder Bay, ON Tillsonburg, ON Timmins, ON Torbay, NL Toronto, ON Trail, BC University Village-Kitchener, ON US Steel-Hamilton, ON Vancouver, BC Welland, ON Winkler, MB
58
Installations in the United States

Ames, IA Ann Arbor, MI Anniston, AL Bakersfield, CA Baltimore Gas & Elect., MD Barefoot Bay, FL Bartow, FL Bath, ME Beaverton, OR Bellaire, TX Bernalillo County, NM Bettendorf, IA Biddeford, ME Bernalillo County, NM Bethlehem, PA Billerica, MA Bloomingdale, IL Bluefield, WV Braintree, MA Brentwood, CA Brentwood, IL Brookline, MA Brooklyn Heights, OH Campbell, CA Cedar Rapids, IA Center Point Energy Charleston, WV Chatham, IL Chestnut, MA Chula Vista, CA Clear Springs, FL Clearwater, FL Clifton, NJ Concord, MA Cotati, CA Davenport, IA Daytona, FL Decatur, IL Devil Forks, UT Dixon, CA Dover, DE Dunkirk, NY Easthampton, MA El Paso, TX Fernandin Beach, FL Fitchburg, MA Fort Huachuca, AZ Fort Worth, TX Fremont, CA Gainesville, VA Hamilton, OH Harrisburg, PA Hartford, CT Henderson, NV Henderson, TN Holland, MI Indianapolis, IN Jackson, MI JFK Airport, NY Jupiter, FL Kansas City, MO Knoxville, TN La Vergne, TN Lakeland, FL Lancaster, MA LaPorte, IN Laredo, TX Leydon, IL Linden, NJ Littleton, MA Long Island City, NY Maitland, FL Maquoketa, IA Manassas, VA Marion, IL Marshall, IL Mays Landing, NJ Memphis, TN Miami, FL Milford, DE Moline, IL Montrose, NY Mountain View, CA Muscatine, IA Nashville, TN Newark, DE New Bedford, MA New Castle, DE New York City, NY Newton Falls, MA North Liberty, IA Oakland, CA Penn State Hazelton, PA Reed City, MI Revere, MA Richmond, CA Richmond, KY Rowley, MA Sacramento, CA Salem, OR San Antonio, TX San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA San Jose, CA San Marcos, CA Santa Fe, NM Scranton, PA Sedalia, CO Shrewsbury, MA South Sioux City, NE Spanish Fork, UT St. Clairsville, OH St. Petersburg, FL Stockton, CA Tulsa, OK Unionville, CT Upper Marlboro, MD US Army, HI Virginia DoT, VA Wallingford, CT Wake Forest, NC Washington D.C. Westbrook, ME West Boylston, MA Wilmington, DE Woodland, CA Worthington, MN
59
Installations Globally
Aruba Australia Adelaide Australia Adelaide City Council Australia Alice Springs Australia City of Charles Sturt Australia City of Onkapringa Australia City of Port Adelaide/Enfield Australia City of Unley Australia City of Salisbury Australia City of West Torrens Australia Darwin Australia District Council of Mt. Barker Australia Dry Creek Australia Garbutt Australia Gippsland Ports Australia Hobart Australia Marina St Vincent Australia Melbourne Australia Onkaparinga Australia Onslow Australia Perth Australia Pittwater Australia Portheadland Australia Port Augusta Australia Port Stanvac Australia Price Australia Quairading Australia Robe Australia Sydney Australia Tumut Australia Umuwa Australia Unley Australia Tully Australia Tumut Barbados Bridgetown Brazil Sao Paulo Colombia Bogota Dominican Republic El Salvador Antiguo Cuscatlan Faroe Islands Torshavn France Montereau-sur-le-Jard France Paris Iceland Reykjavik Ireland Dublin Jamaica Trans Jamaica Highway Mexico Cordoba Mexico Mixoac Norway Aal Norway Alta Norway s Norway Asker Norway Askerdammen Norway Halden Norway Hallingdal Norway Hestevoid Norway Klepp Energi Norway Longyearbyen Norway Naeroy Norway Onninen Norway Oslo Norway Otera Samferdsel Norway Rakkestad Norway Risor Norway Skedsmo Norway Steinkjer Municipality Norway Tafjord Kraft Norway Trandum Asylmottak Norway Trgstad Norway Trnder Energi Norway Vestby Norway YIT/Rana Panama Energy Solutions Panama Panama Santa Maria Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Capitol Building, San Juan South Africa Brachenhurst South Africa Alberton South Africa Mogale City St. Vincent & The Grenadines Switzerland Basel Airport Switzerland Schfflisdorf (near Zurich) Switzerland Siglisdorf Switzerland Steinmaur (near Zurich) Trinidad and Tobago Turks and Caicos UAE Al Shaab Village Project, Sharjah UAE Dubai (Solar Installation) UK Birmingham, England UK Briton Ferry UK Cardiff, Wales UK Dunoon, Scotland UK East Sussex, England UK Leicester, England UK Liverpool, England UK Manchester, England UK Neath Port UK Pembrokeshire, Wales UK Salford, England UK Sovereign UK West Sussex, England
60
White Papers
Vision & Exterior Lighting: Shining Some Light on Scotopic & Photopic Lumens in Roadway Conditions
Dr. Jack Josefowicz, November 2008 This white paper, authored by Dr. Jack Josefowicz, has been reviewed by Dr. Samuel M. Berman and he concurs that the technical and scientific information therein is consistent with generally accepted knowledge in lighting and vision science.
Figure 1: Line of Sight Object Detection & Spatial Brightness Perception on a Roadway 2
61
Summary
The human eye contains 2 major light sensitive photo receptors, namely cones and rods each with its own spectral sensitivity, photopic sensitivity for cones and scotopic sensitivity for rods. At light levels typical of night time roadway lighting, both cones and rods can be active and both spectral sensitivities could apply. However for straight ahead viewing where the line of sight is directed to distant object detection and recognition, such as a pedestrian on a roadway, only cones are relevant. In that case, the photopic function is the operating sensitivity. The rod response, along with scotopic sensitivity, does not contribute to the important visual task of direct object recognition. Other visual tasks such as large area brightness perception, peripheral guidance and detection of objects not in the line of sight are affected by rod response and in that case both photopic and scotopic sensitivity functions need to be included to correctly characterize how light affects vision.
Overview
Objects are best seen and discerned in central vision i.e. when we directly view them straight ahead. In night time conditions, this primary visual task will generally benefit from the presence of an exterior lighting system. However, when we look straight ahead, the most important light coming from the viewed object activates the very center of the retina known as the fovea. The fovea is populated exclusively by cone photo receptors and as a consequence of this anatomical condition (all cone and no rod receptors), the applicable spectral sensitivity for direct object recognition is always the photopic spectral function. This remains true even for the night time light levels typical of roadways. Thus, to assure that a lighting system meets both IESNA and CIE recommendations for the vision functions of object detection and recognition, such as a pedestrian in a roadway, the recommended light levels should be specified in standard photopic photometric quantities. In contrast to central viewing, the perception of spatial brightness involves light that stimulates all parts of the retina including both central and non-central regions. This applies to interior as well as the lit environments typical of night time roadway conditions. In night time conditions, rod and cone receptors will be active in the retina. As a result, both scotopic and photopic spectral sensitivities need to be considered together to adequately describe how light affects spatial brightness perception.
Background
Photoreceptors (i.e. human light sensors) are located at the back surface of the eye [1]. This light sensitive structure is called the retina. The surface of the retina is composed of both rods (~120 million) and cones (~7 million) [2]. Rods and cones are the primary means through which the eye receives optical signals that are subsequently transferred to the brain [2]. There, the signals are converted to visual images that are perceived. The perception of color is accomplished via the cones that are tuned to respond to light in a wavelength range of between blue light (450nm) and red (675nm) light [3] combining to provide a peak for achromatic spectral sensitivity at 555nm. During daytime conditions and high lighting levels, only cones are activated giving the human eye Photopic vision [1][2]. In pitch-black night time and very low lighting levels such as starlight, only rods are activated. Rod receptors are sensitive to wavelengths from violet light (400 nm) to orange light (610 nm)giving the
62

human eye Scotopic vision [1][2]. There is an intermediate luminance level (3 candelas/m2 to 0.01 candelas/m2) referred to as Mesopic vision, where both rods and cones contribute to vision by varying degrees [1][2]. Much of the lighting for roadways, parking lots, and other exterior locations fall within the Mesopic range. In fact, the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) recommends a photopic luminance of between 0.3 and 1.2 candelas/m2 for roadway lighting [4]. In Figure 2, the graph shows the eyes two luminous efficiency functions at various wavelengths (colours) of light normalized by the international definition of the lumen, i.e., 683 lumens at 555nm. The cone achromatic channel for photopic vision, called the photopic spectral sensitivity function (the calibrating function applied to calibrate all light meters) has a maximum sensitivity at the green colour of 555nm. Rods, for scotopic vision, have their maximum spectral sensitivity as shown by the peak of the Scotopic sensitivity function at the bluegreen colour of 507nm. The different peak heights of the two sensitivity functions shown in Figure 2 are a consequence of the fixed and internationally accepted normalization of 683 lumens at 555nm and are not related to innate differences in rod or cone light sensitivity.
Figure 2: Photopic & Scotopic Spectral Sensitivities of the Human Eye: Adapted from [3]
Vision Tasks on a Roadway at Night
While commuting on a roadway, visual function can be separated into at least four distinct tasks Direct (Line of Sight) Viewing along with Object Detection and Recognition, Spatial Brightness Perception, Guidance along with Off-Axis Object Detection and Movement Detection.
63

(a) Line of Sight Viewing with Object Detection (Central Vision is Predominate): At mesopic light levels, this task is essentially independent of brightness of the surrounding environment and focuses only on the identification of objects viewed straight ahead. In the human eye, this task is attended by the fovea, located in the central part of the retina [Figure 3] where vision is the most precise [1]. Only cones are present in the fovea [Figure 4] making the Photopic Sensitivity Function the sole spectral contributor for Line of Sight Viewing and direct Object Detection tasks. This presumption based on the anatomy of the retina has been confirmed for roadway light levels by the studies of He et.al [5]. In that study, a spot of light was flashed in the visual field of several subjects and their reaction response times were measured. This response was studied for light level adaptation conditions typical of night time lit environments. When the spot was presented foveally at these mesopic light levels, photopic luminance alone predicted the measured behaviour. However, when the spot was presented away from the line of sight or visual axis at mesopic light levels, both scotopic and photopic quantities were required to properly correlate the reaction time data.
Figure 3: Schematic of Right Eye. Adapted from [1]
Figure 4: Rod and Cone Density on the Retina [2]
(b) Spatial Brightness Perception (Full Field Vision): This percept relates to how light is perceived in a broadly lit spatial area. At night, this can relate to how secure we feel in it. Spatial Brightness Perception is initiated by both rod and cone photo receptors throughout the entire retina, and thus will require both scotopic and photopic photometric quantities to accurately describe the perceptions [6][7]. (c) Non Central Vision for Guidance and Detection of Targets Located Off the Visual Axis: This task refers to the acquisition of visual information not in the line of sight along with the detection of objects that are not located in the direct central field of view (line of sight) but are off to the sides. In Mesopic conditions, both rods and cones will contribute to both guidance and off-axis target detection [3].
64

(d) Movement Detection: The ability to detect movement both centrally and peripherally is an important visual task that is especially useful for night time driving and security observations [8]. Although central movement detection is known to be primarily governed by photopic spectrum [9], little is known quantitatively about the spectral component of non-central movement detection especially in mesopic conditions. However it has been determined [10] that at mesopic light levels, non-central movement detection is better with more bluish light as compared to more reddish light both set at the same photopic level. This result indicates that rod response is also involved in non-central movement detection.
A Concern for Lighting Practice
For street and roadway lighting applications where mesopic vision may apply [3], it is incorrect to obtain the net response of the eye to brightness or any other vision experience by summing the photopic and scotopic light associated with a light source. The light initiated signals from the rods and cones are combined in the visual cortex of the brain to produce perception. The manner by which they are combined depends on the specifics of the task as well as the light level. For example, at light levels at the upper end of the Mesopic range, rod contributions to brightness perception will be negligible compared to cone signals; whereas at the low end of the Mesopic range, the situation would be reversed. A reduction in photopic light levels below standard lighting specifications, on the basis that scotopic lumens can be added to photopic lumens, ignores the fact that only photopic lumens are involved with direct line of sight object recognition, where primarily cone receptors in the fovea are activated. For good lighting practice applied to street, roadway, and highway lighting applications, it is essential not to deviate from the IES (Illuminating Engineering Society) RP-8-00 specifications [11] or CIE (International Commission on Illumination) 1152005 specifications [4] that define photopic light levels. These specifications are based on the determination of the minimum amount of photopic lumens required for safety and security in Direct Object Recognition applications, such as a pedestrian crossing a roadway.
Comparing LED and HPS Spectral Power Densities and Lumen Outputs
The scotopic and photopic lumens incorporated by the human eye associated with a luminaire with a given spectral power density is determined by weighting that spectral power density with the photopic or scotopic spectral sensitivity. The integrated result over the range of visible wavelengths of the weighted spectral power density curve yields the photopic and scotopic lumens respectively [1][2]. Furthermore, the ratio of scotopic to photopic light for a particular light source (S/P value) is independent of absolute light level to the extent that the spectral power density remains constant [6]. When such a calculation is carried out for the comparison of a typical HPS lamp with the whiter light LED source, the result obtained shows that these LEDs [Figure 7] can have significantly higher S/P values as compared with the typical HPS [Figure 6]. The examples of Figure 6 and Figure 7 show that the S/P value for the LED source is about a factor 2.65 greater than the HPS source. This characteristic may be used to an efficacy advantage in situations where there is a benefit for lighting with relatively more scotopic content such as for area brightness perception or off-axis detection. However, where
65

maximum safety and hence direct straight-on object recognition is critical, such as Line of Sight Object Detection of a pedestrian crossing a street, only photopic lumens should be considered. In Figure 5, the graph shows LRL results for a comparison of a conventional 100W HPS cobra head fixture to LRLL Model A100 LED fixture [12] with equivalent total integrated areas under their spectral power densities. This was measured in a two metre diameter Sphere Optics integrating sphere and generated with the SLM-800 integrating sphere program.
Figure 5: Conventional 100W HPS & LED Roadway Lighting Model A100 Spectral Power Density. Data from LED Roadway Lighting Limited (LRLL)[12].
Figure 6 below shows the lumen spectrum for a conventional 100W HPS streetlight with 6650 lumens total fixture output (9500 initial lamp lumens with a fixture optical efficiency of 70%) The HPS spectral power density shown has been weighted at each wavelength by the photopic and scotopic visual sensitivities as incorporated by both the cones (photopic) and rods (scotopic) in the eye. Similarly, Figure 7 also shows the same type of lumen spectrum for LRLs Model A100 streetlight, which is designed to be a more energy efficient replacement for the conventional 100W HPS streetlight producing the same net fixture lumen output of 6650lm. Because of its larger S/P value, the LED light output provides considerably more scotopic content. However, as previously discussed for street and roadway lighting, only photopic output should be considered for IES and CIE roadway safety specifications. On the other hand, since the photopic lumen output of both lights is the same, energy efficiency can be compared on the basis of fixture lumen output per plug watt (lm/W), also called efficacy. A plug watt is the total electrical power input into the fixture. At a fixture output of 6650 lumens, the LED Roadway Lighting Model A100 has a fixture efficacy as high as 94 lm/W [12] (with inclusion of the power supply) whereas a conventional 100W HPS producing the same output lumens has a fixture efficacy of 48.5 lm/W (with inclusion of a standard magnetic ballast with a power supply efficiency of 73%[13][14]). This means that for the same light output, the Model A100 is almost twice as efficacious when compared to the HPS.
66
Figure 6: Conventional 100W HPS Photopic & Scotopic Lumens per nm as incorporated by the Human Eye: The spectral power density of the HPS light output was weighted by the photopic and scotopic spectral sensitivities. Data from LED Roadway Lighting Limited (LRLL)[12].
Figure 7: LED Roadway Lighting Model A100 Photopic & Scotopic Lumens per nm as incorporated by the Human Eye: The spectral power density of the LED Roadway Light Model A100 light output was weighted by the photopic and scotopic spectral sensitivities. Data from LED Roadway Lighting Limited (LRLL)[12].
67
References
[1] Wyszecki, Gunter, & Stiles, W. S. (1967). Colour science: Concepts and methods, quantitive data and formulas. New York: John Wiley & Sons. [2] Hecht, Eugene. (1987). Optics, 2nd Ed. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. [3] Bullough, John D. & Rea, Mark S. (2004). Visual Performance under Mesopic Conditions. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1862, 89-94. [4] International Commission on Illumination. (1995). CIE 115-1995: Recommendations for the Lighting of Roads for Motor and Pedestrian Traffic. [5] He, Y., Rea, M., Bierman, A., & Bullough, J. (1997). Evaluating Light Source Efficacy Under Mesopic Conditions Using Reaction Times. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 26(1), 125-138. [6] Berman, S.M. (1991). Energy Efficiency Consequences of Scotopic Sensitivity. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 21(1,12), Dec 1992. [7] Rea, M. S. (1986). Visual Performance with Realistic Methods of Changing Contrast. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 15(2), 41-57. [8] Akashi, Y., Rea, M., & Bullough, J. (2006). Driver Decision making in response to Peripheral Moving Targets under Mesopic Light. Lighting Res. Technol., 39(1), 53-67. [9] Anstis, S. (2002). The Purkinje rod-cone shift as a function of luminance and retinal eccentricity. Vision Research, 42, 2485-2491. [10] Anstis, S.M., & Cavanagh, P.A. (1983). A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance. Colour Vision: Physiology & Psychophysics. London: Academic Press. [11] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. (1999). ANSI/IESNA RP-8-00: American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. [12] LED Roadway Lighting Limited (LRLL). (2008). Raw Test Data from a Standard 100W HPS Cobra Head & LRLL Model A100 LED Roadway Light. [13] Nova Scotia Power Inc. P.O. Box 910, Halifax, NS, Canada B3J 2W5 [14] ONeil F.C. Scriven & Associates Ltd (Street Lighting Consultants). 5450 Cornwallis Street, Halifax, NS, Canada B3K 1A9.
68
Incorporating Spectrum Effects for Brightness Perception and Visual Detection at Mesopic Light Levels
Samuel M. Berman1, PhD and Jack Josefowicz2, PhD
1 - Consultant to LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. 2 - Chief Technology Officer, LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.
Figure 1: Spatial Brightness Perception at Mesopic Light Levels
69
Overview
At the night-time light levels that are typical of roadways and exterior environments, both cone and rod retinal photo receptors are generally active and participating in vision. This level of night-time illumination is referred to as Mesopic light conditions or Mesopia and ranges approximately between 20.0 and 0.2 horizontal Lux.
In mesopia and when the viewed lighted space is large, i.e., the field of visual view is large, both rods and cones will contribute to the sense of brightness. Besides brightness perception, in mesopia, rods and cones will also both contribute to the ability to notice objects that are not in the line of sight (off-the-visual-axis detection). In these circumstances, standard light meters that are based on pure cone response (photopic response) will not provide an accurate measure of perceived brightness or response time when light sources of differing spectra are compared. This occurs because, even though the compared sources have the same measured photopic output, the sensation of brightness or the response time capability will depend on both light level and the light source spectrum, and is therefore a consequence of equal cone response but different rod responses. Thus two light sources may have the same photopic efficacy in terms of photopic lumens per watt but if one source (e.g. an LED source), is more proficient at eliciting rod response, i.e. that source has a higher scotopic output for the same photopic output (higher S/P value), then that source will have the added benefit of providing a higher level of brightness perception or off-axis response time. On the other hand, such a source could then be adjusted to a lower level of power to provide the same level of brightness perception or response time as the less scotopically proficient source. In this manner and when these visual tasks are a principal concern, there is the added benefit of a means to save energy. It would be valuable for lighting practice concerned with visual responses in Mesopia, as shown in Figure 1 depicting both central field of view and full field of view, to have a method for quantifying the effects of differing spectra so that the potential benefits of one spectrum over another can be ascertained. Because the visual system behaves in a complex manner for these visual tasks, there is no known apriori procedure for determining a valid quantitative algorithm that would correctly capture the spectral effects. Thus empirical laboratory data is the principal resource for establishing relationships that might be of benefit to exterior lighting practice. This white paper incorporates results from a number of past laboratory studies on brightness perception for large areas and off-axis detection at mesopic light levels. Based on the data of those studies, a coarse quantitative means for comparing the spectral efficacy and establishing the benefits of different light sources in that regime is provided. To illustrate the implications of the laboratory studies an application example is considered here. This example compares two light sources with different spectra to determine the source most visually efficacious when a walkway or a parking lot is lit with primary consideration devoted to pedestrian concerns. In this case the sense of safety and visual comfort is enhanced when the lit environment is perceived as bright (Boyce et. Al., 2000). In particular we compare here standard HPS lighting with LED lighting for their efficacy in providing scene brightness perception. This example considers two different viewing conditions.
70

In the first view a persons primary view is of asphalt pavement. In the second view the primary view is vegetation. To make the comparison at various mesopic light levels, as is shown later in this white paper, the only spectral measure needed of the two sources is their S/P value, the ratio of scotopic to photopic output (generally independent of intensity level for gas discharge lamps and LED sources) (Berman, 1992). A typical S/P value for an HPS source is about 0.64 while LED sources can easily achieve higher S/P values such as S/P = 1.68 (LRL, 2008).
Table 1. Two spectrally different lightings are compared, distinguished by their S/P values. Their respective light levels are presented based on scene brightness perception for 2 viewing conditions, 7% and 25% reflectance, respectively. The better scene brightness efficiency of the higher S/P lighting allows that lighting level to be lowered to the values in column 2 to provide the same mesopic scene brightness perception according to the 2 viewing conditions. (See text for explanations)
Table 1 summarizes the predictions of the laboratory studies for this example. The reflectance values chosen for the two viewing conditions are from the IESNA Handbook (IESNA, 2002). Although surface reflectance can in general vary of the angle of view we take for this example, a traditional approximation is that the reflectance is independent of viewing angle and that the IESNA reflectance values provide an angular average. As can be seen in Fig. 2, for both different reflectance values of 7% and 25%, the equivalent illuminance, or scene brightness perception, for LED lighting with an S/P ratio 1.68, differs by between 25% and 50% greater efficacy depending on the light level.
71
Figure 2. Horizontal illuminance equivalence for LED light (S/P=1.68) and HPS light (S/P=0.64)
The example of Table 1 illustrates the trade-off that occurs between light level and spectrum and shows the potential economic or visual performance benefits achievable by high S/P lighting such as LED lighting. The methodology behind these examples resulting as a consequence of the laboratory studies is described below.
Prologue
As pedestrians who encounter nighttime conditions, our sense of safety and visual comfort is enhanced when the lit environment is perceived as bright (Boyce, et. al., 2000). Furthermore, according to several laboratory studies, our ability to notice the objects around us should also be enhanced when the ambient lighting is perceived as bright (He, et. al., 1997, Eloholma & Halonen, 2006, Fotios, et. al., 2007). Therefore a reasonable goal of good lighting practice for nighttime conditions is to be aware of major principles that can add value to lighting by providing the above desired qualities in the most efficient and acceptable manner. These major principles as discussed below combine the knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the eye with several laboratory studies thereby allowing a reasonable methodology for incorporating lamp spectrum into exterior lighting practice.
72
General Principles
1. 2. 3. In terms of retinal anatomy, the cone retinal photo receptors uniquely populate the central retina (fovea) while the remaining retina is populated by both rods and cones (Polyak, 1941). In terms of their physiology as applied to achromatic brightness perception, the different spectral responses of the 3 cones combine into a single composite achromatic response channel (Lennie, et. al., 1993). This channel has the spectral response given by the photopic function V(). On the other hand, the spectral response of the rod receptors, that is always achromatic, is provided by the scotopic function V() (Stiles & Wyszecki, 1982). At the nighttime light levels that are typical of exterior environments, both cone and rod retinal photo receptors are generally active and participating in vision. This level of nighttime illumination is referred to as Mesopic Light Conditions or Mesopia and ranges approximately between 10.0 and 0.01 Lux at the eye (Stiles & Wyszecki, 1982). Note that for cone dominated foveal tasks the V() function remains the applicable sensitivity at all light levels including mesopic levels. In contrast to vehicle drivers whose primary visual attention is straight-ahead viewing and therefore cone dominated, pedestrians are more likely to apply a global visual attention sensing a large surrounding space (large field of visual view) inclusive of the encompassing environment (Loe, 1999). Vehicle drivers will also incorporate to some degree the larger non-central visual field for guidance and for the noticing of objects off to the sides. A large field of view involves light stimulation of both central and non-central portions of the retina during vision. Thus in Mesopia it is reasonable to presume that the contributions of both rod and cone receptors are necessary in order to have a more comprehensive and accurate accounting of the effects of light for these visual objectives.
4. In this regard, there are four important visual phenomena of potential significance to pedestrians and vehicle drivers that have been investigated in related laboratory studies. These are; a) the perception of overall spatial or scene brightness (Kokoschka, S., 1972, Kokoschka & Bodmann, 1975, Ikeda & Shimozono, 1981, Yaguchi & Ikeda 1984, Sagawa &Takeichi 1986, Sagawa &Takeichi,1992, Rea, 1996, Fotios & Cheal, 2007); b) the ability to take notice of objects not directly in the line of sight (reaction time for off-axis detection) (He, et. al., 1997, Walkey et-al 2006, 2007); c) contrast detection thresholds (Freiding, et. al., 2007) and; d) threshold discriminations (Va rady, et. al., 2007). The understanding and quantification of these investigations require incorporating light mediated responses from both cones and rods. 5. Two patterns emerge from these studies. First, the quantity of rod response as empirically determined by including the amount of scotopic luminance required to account for the data, increases as the light level decreases from the upper to the lower level of mesopia. Second, light sources with relatively more scotopic content are therefore more efficient in eliciting these rod-mediated responses.
6. The straight forward measure of relative scotopic content for a light source (or for any given fixed spectral power density) is provided by the ratio of scotopic to photopic quantities (Berman, 1992). This ratio (S/P value)
73

7. 8. 9. is independent of overall light level so long as the light spectrum of concern does not vary with overall intensity as is essentially the case for gas discharge and LED sources. Three independent parameters are sufficient to provide the correlation of the studies mentioned above in principle 4. These are the measured photopic luminance; the S/P value associated with the spectrum providing the eyes adaptation condition and the empirically determined mixing function, i.e., the specific mix that establishes the relative amounts of photopic and scotopic contributions that describe the state of light adaptation (Berman & Clear, 2001, Rea, et. al., 2004, Eloholma & Halonen, 2006). Because the relative amounts of rod and cone contributions vary with overall light level, the mixing function describing the adaptation conditions will likewise vary with light level. It is also reasonable to expect that the mixing function should depend on the nature of the visual task, but for the different tasks as encompassed by the studies mentioned above in principle 4, the various mixing functions turn out to be rather close. This closeness of mixing function coupled with the realization that there are many photometric unknowns when applying lab studies to real environments, suggests that, for these applications, a single mixing function can be applied that approximately captures the rod effects. This is discussed below in section Constructing the Application Algorithm Light meters are calibrated solely by the cone achromatic collective response, the photopic response function V() (Lennie, et. al., 1993). Furthermore, light level recommendations are generally given in photopic units that, in turn, are based solely on V(). Thus if sources with differing scotopic but equal photopic content are compared in certain mesopic conditions thereby providing the stimulus for different rod responses, conventional light meters will not fully account for the visual effects of the viewed lighting. This could lead to the unexpected result that the outcomes of comparisons of spectrally different lightings would occur in the opposite manner to the conventional light meter indication (Berman, et. al., 1990).
10. Whereas the various laboratory studies can provide simple algorithms for incorporating spectral effects in Mesopia when the visual task is known, the more complex photometric conditions encountered in real nighttime environments may make useful applications to exterior lighting practice equivocal (IESNA, 1999, CIE, 1995). This is emphasized by laboratory conditions where the light adaptation conditions of the are known, i.e. the adaptation luminance of the eye is known and controlled as compared to real environments where the pedestrian or driver is generally confronted with a multitude of spatially differing and not readily determinable luminances. Relevant results of laboratory studies are first summarized and conclusions drawn. Subsequently suggestions are provided regarding point 10 above in order to achieve some degree of applicability to lighting practice.
74
Technical Background
Calibration of light source radiant output (watts) to visually effective light (photopic lumens) is accomplished by applying the empirically determined photopic sensitivity function (the V(l) function). On the other hand, the effective response of the rods to lighting energy is determined by calibrating light source radiant output by the empirically determined scotopic sensitivity function (Stiles & Wyszecki, 1982).
The two functions are similarly shaped but the scotopic function peaks at the lower wavelength of 507 nm distinguished from the value of the 555 nm peak of the photopic function. When the scotopic sensitivity function is normalized to have the value of 683 lumens at 555 nm (the defining point for the lumen), a light source calibrated by the scotopic function will yield the source scotopic lumens (Stiles & Wyszecki, 1982). This procedure copies that of the determination of a light sources photopic lumens resulting from applying the photopic sensitivity function to that light source spectral power distribution. For a fixed spectral power distribution, the ratio of scotopic to photopic lumens (S/P) is a constant independent of overall illumination level. Thus for most gas discharge lamps and LED sources this ratio will be a constant factor independent of light level and a ratio (S/P value) can be assigned to a specific lamp (Berman, 1992). In the mesopic regime many visual responses to light will depend on both photopic and scotopic quantities. Except for foveal vision that is uniquely cone dominated and therefore purely photopic at all light levels (Walters & Wright, 1943, Yaguchi & Ikeda, 1984), there is no a priori knowledge for a given task that can predict the manner in which these two quantities combine and the task dependent specific combination must be determined by empirical measurement. Quite remarkably, several heavily researched laboratory mesopic tasks, namely large area brightness perception, reaction time for off-axis detection and threshold contrast detection that have the appearance of disparate tasks yield empirical results with approximately similar combinations of the varying scotopic and photopic responses (Adrian, 1999). This fortuitous circumstance could be a benefit to lighting practice because it allows for a reasonable first step in providing an approximate simplified single algorithm that incorporates both rod and cone responses.
Procedures
The development of this single algorithm builds on introducing the concept of mesopic adaptation luminance.
The mesopic adaptation luminance is defined here as that combination of adapting photopic and scotopic luminances that correlates with the light level behavior of a given task. Some cautions in using mesopic adaptation luminance are important because, even though it has the units of luminance the mesopic adaptation luminance is not a luminance in the traditional sense of a photometric quantity as it is a spatially global quantity referring to the light adaptation conditions of the eye (Berman & Clear, 2001, Walkey, et. al., 2006). As such, it is not fundamental in the same manner as photopic and scotopic luminances because there are no new retinal detectors that become active in the mesopic region and furthermore does not obey simple numerical additivity as is the case for ordinary luminances (Clear & Berman, 2001, 2006).
75

Furthermore, since mesopic luminance is not a local quantity it cannot be used in the traditional sense to define task contrast. These cautions do not apply to the traditional photopic and scotopic luminances that are defined as local or global photometric quantities and obey additivity in the same manner as numerical algebraic quantities with each luminance type related to a particular retinal receptor. Mesopic adaptation luminance is nevertheless a useful concept because it is constructed so that when two spectrally different light sources have their different outputs of photopic and scotopic luminance adjusted to produce equal visual response, the two sources are deemed to provide the same mesopic adaptation luminance. As mentioned previously, the relative amounts of photopic and scotopic luminances that lead to mesopic adaptation luminances will depend on light levels and possibly task parameters.
Constructing the Application Algorithm
The practical application algorithm that jointly considers the data from the studies of large area brightness perception, off-axis reaction time and threshold contrast may be developed as follows (Berman & Clear, 2001).
The mesopic adaptation luminance in units of cd/m2 is assumed to be a scaled linear combination of photopic P, and scotopic S luminances (also in units of cd/m2) expressed in the form;
Lmes = P + (1-)S = P[ +(1-)S/P]
(1)
This simple additive form is justified on the basis of the approximately valid assumption that the rod and cone systems respond to illumination independently. In addition, the correlated form of the coefficients of P&S above (they add to unity and provide the scaling) is based on the premise that if Lmes were to be determined (analogously to photopic and scotopic luminances) via an integration of a source spectral power density combined with a mesopic spectral sensitivity function, then that mesopic sensitivity function is normalized in the same manner as the photopic and scotopic sensitivity functions, i.e., all have the value 683 lumens at 555nm (Stiles & Wyszecki 1982). Furthermore, from the right side of equation 1 and for a spectral power density with a characteristic of S/P< 1, it follows that Lmes < P and for sources with S/P > 1, it follows that Lmes > P. In general, the mixing function a in equation 1 will depend on the lighting level and possibly the specific task. At low levels Lmes should be purely scotopic so the function will approach zero and at higher levels Lmes should be purely photopic so the function will approach unity. A more comprehensive approach (Ikeda & Shimozono, 1981) has the mix of scotopic and photopic luminances expressed by as functionally determined by Lmes itself. Such a functional dependence is likely as it allows for a feedback within the visual system that should depend on the mixture of S and P that in turn is setting the adaptation conditions. Berman & Clear (2001) used this concept and found that much of the large area brightness perception data as well as the He, et. al., (1997) off-axis reaction time data could both be empirically fit fairly well with a single simple rational fraction function for with the explicit dependence on Lmes as given below by;
76
(Lmes) = Lmes /(1/9 + Lmes)

where the empirically numerical constant 1/9, determined by fitting the data, has the units of cd/m2. Since 2001 additional studies on threshold contrast and off-axis reaction time (Walkey et al 2006, 2007, Varady, et. al., 2007) have been completed. If all these studies are also included together in the empirical fit to the data, the empirical constant 1/9 in the above equation changes approximately to the value 1/7 (again in units of cd/m2). Thus presently the best empirical fit for the mixing parameter a based on the combined data of these studies is given by;
(Lmes) = Lmes /(1/7 + Lmes)
(2)
This is the unexpected similarity between the several ostensibly dissimilar tasks mentioned above. Since in eq.2 depends on the mesopic adaptation luminance, this form captures the feedback as mentioned above. The above expression for a (eq.2) allows for the deduction of the first of the 2 important application equations. Given two sources or lighting environments A and B with the same Lmes, i.e. they yield the same visual response we would have Lmes(A)= Lmes(B). Then combining equations 1 and 2 above, the ratio PB/PA is obtained i.e. the ratio of photopic luminances of the 2 sources that provides the same Lmes . Performing the above algebra yields the useful expression
PB = PA(Lmes + kA/7)/(Lmes + kB/7) (3)

where KA = SA/PA and KB=SB/PB (the S/P values for the sources A and B). As mentioned above, when the S/P values are different for the 2 sources but they both produce the same visual task outcome (their values of Lmes are the same) then their photopic luminances will be in the ratio given by equation (3) above. One can also substitute equation (2) into equation (1) and algebraically solve the resultant quadratic equation for Lmes. This yields the following expression for Lmes (in units of cd/m2) in terms of the photopic luminance P associated with a given light source (or lighting environment) and its spectrum ratio S/P = K value.
2Lmes = (P - 1/7 + [(P - 1/7)2 + 4KP/7]1/2). (4)

The above equation for Lmes can be inserted into equation 3 in terms of PA and KA thereby providing an algebraic relationship between PA and PB that only depends on their S/P values for the condition where the 2 sources yield the same Lmes. Equations (3) and (4) constitute a complete closed form algorithm that can be applied to the comparison of various light sources at mesopic conditions for the considerations of large area brightness perception, off-axis reaction time and threshold contrast. Numerical comparisons for selected sources based on a specified photopic luminance condition can be readily calculable from equations (3) & (4) with the knowledge of the source S/P values.
77
Based on equation 4, Table 2 below lists a variety of values of Lmes (labeled as L in the table) for various values of S/P and photopic luminances P ranging from 0,01 to 10 cd/m2. The values of Lmes determined by applying equation (4) generally agree within 5% or better with those published by the MOVE project (Eloholma & Halonen 2006). However in the absence of data for large area brightness perception for luminances above approximately 1 to 2 cd/m2, it would be inappropriate to use the values in table 2 for scene brightness and should be restricted to apply only for offaxis detection and threshold contrast. (This is discussed further below in the three paragraphs preceding the conclusion). Equations (3) & (4) coupled with the chosen reflectivities were applied as the methodology to evaluate the example shown in Table 1 of the overview section. Because the S/P value is source dependent, a given sources efficacy to produce a particular value of Lmes that in turn depends on both P and S/P will also depend on both P and S/P. At a given value of P in mesopia and source S/P the traditional luminous efficacy in lumens per watt for that source will be modified by the multiplicative factor Lmes/P when the tasks of spatial brightness perception, off-axis detection and threshold contrast are of concern (see also Lewin 2001). Table 3 lists a variety of values for Lmes/P. (Note Lmes is also labeled L in Table 3.) [It is important to note as mentioned above, that if the task is located in the direct line of sight and subtends a visual angle of 2 degrees or less (the rod free retinal foveal angular area) there would be no rod stimulation from visual task light and the above discussions do not apply. For foveal viewing (where there is foveal light) and when large area spatial brightness is not of concern, the relevant luminance is just the cone based photopic luminance.]
Realistic Environments
Generally pedestrians moving around at night in a lit environment will not have a controlled adaptation luminance as was the case for the laboratory studies. Pedestrians will vary their fixations and move their eyes to different locations that can provide different luminance conditions depending on the light distribution and reflectivity of materials in view. Even if the specified pavement luminance is well produced by the environmental lighting, pedestrians will shift their view to different directions and will not necessarily remain constantly fixating the pavement. Furthermore similar visual uncertainties apply as well to drivers concerned with off-axis visibility. Thus, there is no unambiguous methodology afforded lighting practice for applying the laboratory results that have been evaluated with knowledge of a specific adaptation luminance. To this end some discussion is presented below on how the above laboratory results might be incorporated into an approximate practice.
In an environment where luminance is constant and the view is essentially the full visual field, the photopic illuminance at the eye E with respect to a specific direction of gaze, (which captures the viewed environment reflectivities), is simply related to that constant luminance P by the equation (Walsh 1958),
Pedestrian Environments
78
E[lux] = P [cd/m2]
(5)
where the factor is the projected solid angle of a full 180 degree field. Thus the illuminance at the eye can provide a very rough guide as to what the adapting luminance could be. In many cases the field of view for pedestrians will be large and the illuminance at eye level in the direction of gaze (DOG illuminance for the pertinent direction) can be readily evaluated either by direct measurement e.g., in a retrofit application, or by computer simulation as a design guide, to obtain the DOG illuminance. An approximate adaptation luminance for that direction is then determined by scaling that illuminance by the factor (1/) and that value becomes the input value P for Tables 2 and 3. For example (Boyce, 1999) in a hypothetical retrofit application, an area is lit by HPS lighting and the mean of several photopic and scotopic illuminance measurements made at the eye position in a given direction or alternatively by computer simulation results in mean illuminances 0.314 photopic Lux and 0.188 scotopic Lux respectively. Then the approximate adaptation photopic luminance P is 0.314/ = 0.1cd/m2 and the mean S/P value is (0.188/0.314) =0.6. From Table 2 the mesopic adaptation luminance can then be determined yielding Lmes =0.0736. The value of luminance that would be required by another source with its particular average S/P value to provide the same Lmes can be determined by using equation 3 above or by looking through table 2 to locate the applicable photopic luminance P associated with the alternative S/P that produces the same Lmes as determined for the HPS lighting condition. For example, an LED system with S/P = 1.9 would produce the same Lmes as produced by the above HPS system with an LED luminance of 0.05 or one-half the value required by the HPS system. This can allow the opportunity for power and energy savings depending on overall system efficacies. Similarly if the LED system provides a photopic luminance of 0.05 cd/m2, then the above HPS system would need to be set a twice that luminance value in order to achieve the same Lmes i.e. the same brightness perception or off-axis/threshold contrast detection capability. On the other hand if both sources have the same mean photopic luminance then the LED system by virtue of its higher value of Lmes would provide a higher level of brightness perception as well as better off-axis and contrast detection. In many cases the lit field of view relevant for pedestrians could be less than full field of 180 degrees of visual angle while on the other hand, luminance distributions could be quite non-uniform often peaked in specific directions. Therefore the conversion factor used above in equation (5) for converting average illuminance at the eye to mean adaptation luminance will be somewhat inaccurate by virtue of being either too small or too large a value.
79

In some situations significant portions of the retina will have very different adaptation levels such as driving on a well lit roadway but with a minimum of lighting in the surrounding regions off road. In this case the central retina light adaptation level and the peripheral retina light adaptation level would be very different and the relevant luminance for centrally viewed tasks and peripheral view tasks should be considered separately.
Scene brightness perception in the luminance region between 1cd/m2 and 10 cd/m2
Because of lack of brightness perception data it was previously noted above that it would be inappropriate to apply the tabular values of Lmes from the MOVE project or those determined from equation (4) or table 3 to scene brightness in the luminance region above 1 cd/m2. (Depending on surface reflectivities the luminance range of 1 to 10cd/m2 could correspond roughly to horizontal illuminances between 10 to 100 Lux.) However there is good reason to believe that significant higher brightness perception associated with relatively higher S/P spectrum lighting will continue to persist through light levels higher than 1.0 cd/m2 although rods may not be the most significant receptor (Gamlin et-al 2007). This continued higher brightness perception is based on the proposition that pupil size variation and brightness perception are correlated i.e., pupils shrink when lighting appears brighter and dilate when lighting appears dimmer. Past findings have shown that pupil size is not fully maximized (dilated) in the 0.5 to 5.0 cd/m2 region (Spring & Stiles 1949) and secondly that pupil size variation and brightness perception are indeed correlated (Newsome 1971). Further studies examining brightness perception in this high mesopic light level regime would be useful.
Conclusion
In Mesopia and at the same level of photopic luminance, laboratory studies demonstrate quantitatively that scotopically enhanced sources e.g., LED systems, have clear visual and possible economic advantages over scotopically impoverished sources such as HPS. These advantages include brightness perception, the ability to detect off-the-visual axis information and contrast thresholds. Some field studies also support the same conclusions (Morante, 2008). These findings encourage further consideration for the appropriate application with the possibly of implementation of high S/P lighting such as provided by LED systems.
80
References
Adrian, W., 1999, The Influence of the Spectral Power Distribution for Equal Visual Performance in Roadway Lighting Levels. Adrian, W., 1999, Comments to the paper of M. S. Rea A Proposed System of Photometry in the Mesopic Region. Proceedings: Vision at Low Light Levels, EPRI Distribution Center, 207 Coggins Drive, P.O. Box 23205, Pleasant Hills, CA 94523: pages 85 -99, and 73-74. Berman, S.M., Jewett, D.J., Fein, G., Saika, G., and Ashford, F. 1990. Photopic luminance does not always predict perceived room brightness. Lighting Research Technology, 22(1): 37-41. Berman, SM 1992; Energy Efficiency Consequences of Scotopic Sensitivity, Journal of the IES, Vol. 21, No. 1, No. 12, Dec. Berman, S., M, and Clear, R., 1999, Some Vision and Lighting Issues at Mesopic Levels. Proceedings: Vision at Low Light Levels, EPRI Distribution Center, 207 Coggins Drive, P.O. Box 23205, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523: pages 123 - 147. Berman S, Clear R. 2001; Additivity constraints and visual task considerations in mesopic photometry. J. Illum. Eng. Soc.; 30 (1): 90- 104. Boyce PR, Bruno LD. 1999; An evaluation of high pressure sodium and metal halide light sources for parking lot lighting. J. Illum. Eng. Soc.; 28: 16-32. Boyce PR, Eklund NH, Hamilton BJ, Bruno, LD, 2000; Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Res. Technol.; 32: 79-/91. Clear, RD. & Berman, SM: Comment on A proposed unified system of photometry, Lighting Res. Technol., 2006, 38,(3): 267 - 269. Eloholma M, Halonen L, 2006. New model for mesopic photometry and its application to road lighting. LEUKOS; 2: 263293. Fotios SA. 2002; Experimental conditions to examine the relationship between lamp color properties and apparent brightness. Lighting Res. Technol. 34: 29_/38. Fotios SA, Cheal C, Boyce PR. 2005. Light source spectrum, brightness perception and visual performance in pedestrian environments: a review. Lighting Research & Technology; 37: 27194. Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2007. Lighting for subsidiary streets: investigation of lamps of different SPD. part 2 brightness. Lighting Research & Technology; 39: 233 252.
81

Freiding A, Ketoma ki J, Eloholma M, Halonen L, Walkey H, Goodman T,Alferdinck J, Va rady G, Bodrogi P. 2007; Mesopic visual efficiency I: detection threshold experiments. Lighting Research and Technology 39: 319334. Gamlin, P.D., et al. (2007), Human and macaque pupil responses driven by melanopsin containing retinal ganglion cells. Vision Research, 47, 946-954 He Y, Rea MS, Bierman A, Bullough, J. 1997. Evaluating light source efficacy under mesopic conditions using reaction times. J. Illum. Eng. Soc.; 26: 125-138. He Y, Bierman A, Rea M. 1998. A system of mesopic photometry. Lighting Res. Technol.; 30: 175-181. Ikeda, M. & Shimozono, H. 1981.Mesopic luminous efficiency functions. J. Opt. Soc. Am.; 71: 280-284. International Commission on Illumination, 1989, Mesopic Photometry: History, Special Problems and Practical Solutions, CIE 81. International Commission on Illumination. (1995). CIE 115-1995: Recommendations for the Lighting of Roads for Motor and Pedestrian Traffic. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. (2000). ANSI/IESNA RP-8-00: American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. Kokoschka, S., 1972, Untersuchungen zur mesopischen Strahlungsbewertung, Die Farbe, Vol. 21(6): 39 -112. Kokoschka S, Bodmann HW, 1975, A consistent system for the photometric evaluation of radiation over the whole range of adaptation. Proceedings:18th session. London: CIE publication #36, 1975; 217225. Kokoschka S, Adrian W. 1984.Influence of field size on the spectral sensitivity of the eye in the photopic and mesopic range, Am. J. Optom Physiol. Optics; 62: 119-26. Lewin I. 2001; Lumen effectiveness multipliers for outdoor lighting design.. J. Illum. Eng. Soc.; 30: 40-/52. Loe DL. 1999, Measuring the light appearance of a space. Light & Lighting 1999; 11: 3537. LED Roadway Lighting Limited (LRLL). (2008). Raw Test Data from a Standard 100W HPS Cobra Head & LRLL Model A100 LED Roadway Light. Morante P. 2008, Mesopic street lighting, Demonstration and evaluation, Final report. Lighting Research Center, Rensselear Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. Newsome, D. A. (1971). Afterimage and pupillary activity following strong light exposure. Vision Research, 11, 275288. Palmer DA. 1996. A system of mesopic photometry. Nature; 209: 276-/81.
82
Palmer DA. 1968, Standard observer for large-field photometry at any level. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1968; 58(9): 1296 1299. Polyak, S.L. 1941. The Retina. University of Chicago Press. Rea MS. 1996; Essay by invitation. Lighting Design and Application October Issue: pgs 15-16. Rea, MS, Bullough JD, Freyssinier JP, Bierman A. 2004; A proposed unified system of photometry. Lighting Res. Technol. 36: 85-111. Sagawa, K., and Takeichi, K., 1986, Spectral luminous efficiency functions in the mesopic range. JOSA A, Vol. 3(1): 71 - 75.
Sagawa K, Takeichi K. 1992. System of mesopic photometry for evaluating lights in terms of comparative brightness relationships. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A; 9(8): 1240-1246 Va rady G, Freiding A, Eloholma M, Halonen L, Walkey H, Goodman T, Alferdinck J. 2007. Mesopic visual efficiency III: discrimination threshold experiments. Lighting Research and Technology 39: 355364. Walkey HC, Harlow, JA, and. Barbur, JL. 2006. Changes in reaction time and search time with background luminance in the mesopic range Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 26: 288299. Walkey H, Orrevetela inen P, Barbur J, Halonen L, Goodman T, Alferdinck J, Freiding A, Szalma s A. 2007. Mesopic visual efficiency II: reaction time experiments. Lighting Research and Technology; 39: 335354. Walters, H. V. and W. D. Wright. 1943. The spectral sensitivity of the fovea and extra fovea in the Purkinje range. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 131(865): 340-361. Walsh, JWT. 1958. Photometry pg. 137, Dover Publications. Wyszecki, G., and Stiles,W. S., 1982, Color Science : Concepts and Methods, New York, Wiley& Sons. Yaguchi, H. &Ikeda, M. 1984, Mesopic luminous efficiency functions for various adapting levels. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (1) 120123.
83
84
85
86
87
Reliability Prediction Considerations Overview

Dr. Jack Josefowicz, Executive Vice President, Technology Solutions LED Roadway Lighting Limited, January 4, 2012 Reliability is often misunderstood and misused because there have been many different approaches and methods developed for predicting failures in electronics systems. There is often confusion when discussing reliability prediction for electronic systems because the failure rate is dependent on the method used for analysis. Further, for all the widely used methods listed in the table below, the calculated Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) for an electronic system will have different and sometimes large differences in MTBF values. Of the methods listed in the table, Telcordia SR332 has become one of the widely used and most popular tools for reliability prediction. It was first developed at AT&T Bell Labs some 40 years ago to help understand reliability in telecommunications systems. It continues to be one of the most relevant reliability prediction methods and is continuously updated so that it encompasses new information about component reliability and their ratings as new integrated circuit component and electronic components are introduced into the market. The company, Telcordia, provides consulting in electronics, electronics research, develops and provides open standards, logical software, and electronics design. The Telcordia SR332 method for reliability prediction is used in many electronics fields, by both manufacturing companies and their customers, including telecommunications, aerospace, fire and safety electronics, medical electronics, space communications, automotive, and many other fields where reliability and long life expectancy is important. This is the reason LRL chose Telcordia SR332 for reliability prediction. SOME POPULAR RELIABILITY PREDICTION METHODS MIL-HDBK-217F Parts count only MIL-HDBK-217F Parts stress only MIL-HDBK-217F Both Parts count and Parts stress Bellcore TR332 Telcordia SR332 Bellcore TR332 and Telcordia SR332 Siemens SN29500 British Telecom HRD4 and HRD5 Field Returns Life Testing Reliability
Prediction Considerations Overview 2012-01-04 LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. 2012
88

Telcordia SR332 is a method that calculates failure rate () All electronic systems have a failure rate, which is the number of units failing per unit time. This failure rate changes throughout the life of the product. Initially, during manufacturing of the electronic system, there may be assembly, connector, faulty component and other problems that can lead to early failure, or the infant mortality period (IMP). All manufacturers strive to send product to customers in the field that will not have failures related to infant mortality. To mitigate IMP failures, intensive and well-designed quality assurance and testing must be done to weed out IMP related failures. At LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. (LRL), post electronics assembled power supplies are put through functional testing prior to assembly into lighting fixtures. A variety of parameter checks assures that IMP related failures in the electronic system are caught and not shipped to customers. This leaves a product with a useful life period during which failures occur randomly, i.e., is constant. Once the electronic system and its component reach end of life, i.e., a wear out period, the electronic system useful life is ended and this is where begins to increase dramatically. In the case of LRL designed power supply systems, the useful life is designed to be 20 years. The Telcordia SR332 method, as well as the other methods in the table above, uses calculation strategies that include input of the life (reliability) rating for every single electronics component that is identified to be part of the electronics system. In the design of any electronics system, the selection of components and their reliability rating is critical to the calculated value of MTBF which determines the failure rate, . For example, LRL only uses aerospace-aeronautic quality capacitors that are designed for resistance to vibration, high temperature operation and are constructed and engineered for overall long life. Basically, a commercial capacitor is rated for 26,000 hours (~6 years) at 85C operation, while the LRL aerospace capacitor is rated for 110,000 hours (>20 years) at 85C. If every component in an electronics system is selected with the same high reliability and long life requirement (the method used by LRL), the overall system failure rate will be lower than a commercial low cost system where component selection is primarily influenced by low cost and useful life expectancy is targeted to be just beyond 5 years. There are other reliability factors that also impact overall system reliability and failure rate that are often not included directly in the reliability prediction models discussed above. They include printed circuit board (PCB) design and PCB materials selection, overall PCB layout and design for maximum reliability over the life of the system (i.e., thickness of copper traces, size of spaces between traces, type of dielectric material used and its temperature rating, etc.). Further, other design and component related reliability issues stem from the selection of connectors and other hardware. For example, if the DC output wires from the power supply are not vibration proof or water proof, either vibration or electro galvanic reactions in a wet environment could lead to a system failure, even though the rest of the electronics system is functioning properly. The LED luminaires designed by LRL have power supplies housed in IP67 containment environments and all connectors are protected from the environment, and they have high vibration tolerance. For the calculation of MTBF, strict guidelines are defined by the reliability prediction method used. The value of MTBF for an electronics system is dependent on the number of parts in the electronics system, the reliability rating of each part, the stress condition defined for the operation of the system as well as the operating temperature in the field. During the electronics system useful life period, assuming a constant failure rate, MTBF is defined as the inverse of the failure rate and they can be used interchangeably, i.e.
89
=1/MTBF
Often, MTBF is misunderstood to mean a minimum, guaranteed, time between failures. This is not correct. The parameter, MTBF, is used to calculate reliability, (R) through a simple exponential distribution equation as follows:
R(t) = e-t/MTBF
where t = time product is in the field, and e is the exponential function. For example, if the calculation of R for an electronic system at a particular operating temperature is 0.96, it would result in reliability (4% failures) of 96% of product in the field. The MTBF does depend on the operating temperature (the higher the operating temperature, the lower the reliability), so that the overall design of the thermal management system, both for the LEDs and the power supply, is a critical design element of any LED light fixture. In the case of LRL LED lighting products (the Satellite Series of LED luminaires from LRL), the thermal management system has ~9 square inches of passive cooling fin per LED and it is also active in keeping the power supply cool. This compares with competitors LED luminaires where there is less than half the fin cooling area. The highly efficient thermal management system designed into LRL LED luminaires results in a lower operating temperature for both the LED and the power supply compared to most LRL competitors products. In summary, LRL luminaires have custom designed high reliability power supply drivers. They have been designed with high reliability components and attention to environmental stress (such as vibration, aggressive thermal cycling, high and low temperatures, high humidity, salt spray, and other such factors). The result is that LRL power supplies have MTBF (determined by a 3rd party) of typically between 2 million and 3 million hours at operating temperature (depending on drive current used and the ambient temperature where they are installed). By contrast, LRL competitors typically use commercial off the shelf power supplies to drive the LEDs. The commercial power supplies typically have MTBF at operating conditions that is a factor of 10 lower, i.e., 100,000 to 200,000 hours. This leads competitors commercial power supplies to have a useful life period that is approximately 1/5th that of LRL power supplies.
90
Summary of full report prepared by DMD & Associates Ltd., dated March 17, 2010
Report Summary: Nova Scotia Pilot Project (1,100 fixtures) 2009-2010
Project Overview: This pilot project, which commenced in 2009, consisted of a partnership between LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. (LRL), eco Nova Scotia, Conserve Nova Scotia, and Natural Resources Canada. The project included 19 communities throughout Nova Scotia and 1,100 street light fixtures were retrofitted from existing HPS (highpressure sodium) to LRLs SatelliteTM Series LED-based street light fixtures. DMD & Associates Ltd., headquartered in Surrey, BC, was retained to review the computer lighting calculations and design factors brought forward by the supplier (LRL), review testing procedures and calculate energy savings. The report prepared by DMD & Associates Ltd. includes: Technology comparison Discussion of barriers of LED technology Review of industry standards and concepts (e.g. IESNA classification of roadways with varying pedestrian conflict) Overview of calculations and a summary report of calculations, by fixture location Public Opinion To gather public opinion regarding the pilot project, LRL distributed 250 comment cards to a random sample of local residents in the study areas. Questions and results of responses were as follows: Question - Do you view the installations of the LED fixture positively? Response - 95% of the residents responded yes. Question - Would you like to see more in your Municipality? Response - 92% of residents responded yes. Conclusions DMD & Associates Ltd. determined that LRL was able to meet current lighting standards for this pilot project in all of the chosen locations. An average energy savings of 53% was achieved by the installation of the SatelliteTM Series fixtures at the pilot locations, while still meeting IESNA roadway lighting recommended levels. See the table below, which details the energy savings for each location in the pilot study.
91
92
SAT-96M
T: + 1 (877) 533.5755 F: 1 (888) 533.5755 E: info@ledroadwaylighting.com www. ledroadwaylighting.com 115 Chain Lake Drive, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3S 1B3 Canada
LED Roadway Lighting Ltd. 2007-2012. Intellectual Property Notice: Canadian, U.S., and international patents granted and pending. Contact LED Roadway Lighting for further information. 109

LED Roadway Lighting e Catalogue

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LED Roadway Lighting e Catalogue

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LED Roadway Lighting e Catalogue

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are some of the LED roadway lighting products discussed in the document?

What are some of the LED roadway lighting products discussed in the document?

What was the goal of the Nova Scotia pilot project?

What was the goal of the Nova Scotia pilot project?

Product Catalog

LRL Product Catalog EN 2012-04-17

Leading the LED technology wave

About LED Roadway Lighting Ltd.

Leading the LED technology wave

Our Mission Statement

Leading the LED technology wave

LRLs SAT-S luminaire for street and area lighting applications.

Single Source Responsibility

Nitrogen-fed soldering process for lead-free solder joint integrity.

Controls and Monitoring (Streetlight Intelligence)

XRF analyzer for analysis of component chemistry.

A partial listing of installation locations is found below:

Introducing the SatelliteTM Series

Leading the LED technology wave

Introducing the Satellite Series

Leading the LED technology wave

LRL Satellite Series Thermal Management System

Unique fin design provides a self-cleaning feature

Leading the LED technology wave

Angled light engines = more light on the road surface

Proprietary reflective cup system

Acrylic lens cover

Leading the LED technology wave

Typical Light Distribution Comparison: LRL vs. Competing Technologies

LED Roadway Lighting (LRL) units provide uniform light coverage

Typical competitor LED coverage leaves dark sections between fixtures

Light distribution at 180 ft (55 m) pole spacings

Consistent Lighting (No Dark Band)

Leading the LED technology wave

Power Supply (Driver) Electronics

Power Supply Design for 20 year Life Reliability

Leading the LED technology wave

Leading the LED technology wave

SAT-S Series (SAT-24S, SAT-48S)

Above: SAT-S fixture with Bronze finish (RAL 7022)

Leading the LED technology wave

SAT-M Series (SAT-72M, SAT-96M)

Above: SAT-L fixture with Black finish (RAL 9005)

Above: SAT-L fixture with Gray finish (RAL 7035)

The newest addition to the Satellite Series product line

SAT-L fixture with Gray finish (RAL 7035)

Leading the LED technology wave

SAT-24S (24 LEDs)

Technical Specifications: SatelliteTM Series LED Roadway Luminaire

167mm (6.57 in)

Figure 1 Luminaire side profile***

Figure 2 Luminaire top***

Figure 3 Luminaire bottom***

Leading the LED technology wave

Technical Specifications: SatelliteTM Series LED Roadway Luminaire

SAT-48S (48 LEDs)

18 lb 15.0 in 16.2 in 6.57 in < 0.509 ft2

Acrylic Single piece, die-cast aluminum 1.625 to 2.375/ 42 to 60 mm OD tenons

167mm (6.57 in)

Figure 1 Luminaire side profile***