Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 163 views

    Albert Vs University Publishing Co

    Uploaded by

    Syoi Diazx
    Mariano Albert entered into a contract with University Publishing Co., Inc. through its president Jose M. Aruego to publish Albert's revised commentaries. When University failed to pay the second installment, Albert sued and won. However, it was discovered that University was not registered with the SEC. The Supreme Court ruled that Aruego represented a non-existent entity and induced the court to believe it existed. As the real party to the contract, Aruego was personally liable. The Court also held that Aruego could not claim corporation by estoppel as he had induced Albert through willful misrepresentation of University's status.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Albert Vs University Publishing Co

    Uploaded by

    Syoi Diazx
    163 views1 page
    Mariano Albert entered into a contract with University Publishing Co., Inc. through its president Jose M. Aruego to publish Albert's revised commentaries. When University failed to pay the second installment, Albert sued and won. However, it was discovered that University was not registered with the SEC. The Supreme Court ruled that Aruego represented a non-existent entity and induced the court to believe it existed. As the real party to the contract, Aruego was personally liable. The Court also held that Aruego could not claim corporation by estoppel as he had induced Albert through willful misrepresentation of University's status.

    Original Description:

    corpo

    Original Title

    Albert vs University Publishing Co

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Mariano Albert entered into a contract with University Publishing Co., Inc. through its president Jose M. Aruego to publish Albert's revised commentaries. When University failed to pay the second installment, Albert sued and won. However, it was discovered that University was not registered with the SEC. The Supreme Court ruled that Aruego represented a non-existent entity and induced the court to believe it existed. As the real party to the contract, Aruego was personally liable. The Court also held that Aruego could not claim corporation by estoppel as he had induced Albert through willful misrepresentation of University's status.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    163 views1 page

    Albert Vs University Publishing Co

    Uploaded by

    Syoi Diazx
    Mariano Albert entered into a contract with University Publishing Co., Inc. through its president Jose M. Aruego to publish Albert's revised commentaries. When University failed to pay the second installment, Albert sued and won. However, it was discovered that University was not registered with the SEC. The Supreme Court ruled that Aruego represented a non-existent entity and induced the court to believe it existed. As the real party to the contract, Aruego was personally liable. The Court also held that Aruego could not claim corporation by estoppel as he had induced Albert through willful misrepresentation of University's status.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    ALBERT VS UNIVERSITY PUBLISHING CO., INC. (Jan.

    30, 1965) Mariano Albert entered into a contract with University Publishing Co., Inc. through Jose M. Aruego, its President, whereby University would pay plaintiff for the exclusive right to publish his revised Commentaries on the Revised Penal Code. The contract stipulated that failure to pay one installment would render the rest of the payments due. When University failed to pay the second installment, Albert sued for collection and won. However, upon execution, it was found that University was not registered with the SEC. Albert petitioned for a writ of execution against Jose M. Aruego as the real defendant. University opposed, on the ground that Aruego was not a party to the case. The Supreme Court found that Aruego represented a non-existent entity and induced not only Albert but the court to believe in such representation. Aruego, acting as representative of such non-existent principal, was the real party to the contract sued upon, and thus assumed such privileges and obligations and became personally liable for the contract entered into or for other acts performed as such agent. The Supreme Court likewise held that the doctrine of corporation by estoppel cannot be set up against Albert since it was Aruego who had induced him to act upon his (Aruego's) willful representation that University had been duly organized and was existing under the law.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy