Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 87 views

    Analisis CFA by Lisrel

    Uploaded by

    Atoillah Isvandiary
    The document presents the results of analyzing a correlation matrix using structural equation modeling in LISREL. It includes output showing the parameter specifications, estimates, fit statistics and other results. It evaluates whether the SEM model is appropriate based on several fit criteria values in the output such as the chi-square test, RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, RMR, NFI and NNFI.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Analisis CFA by Lisrel

    Uploaded by

    Atoillah Isvandiary
    87 views8 pages
    The document presents the results of analyzing a correlation matrix using structural equation modeling in LISREL. It includes output showing the parameter specifications, estimates, fit statistics and other results. It evaluates whether the SEM model is appropriate based on several fit criteria values in the output such as the chi-square test, RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, RMR, NFI and NNFI.

    Original Description:

    confirmatory factor analysis

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document presents the results of analyzing a correlation matrix using structural equation modeling in LISREL. It includes output showing the parameter specifications, estimates, fit statistics and other results. It evaluates whether the SEM model is appropriate based on several fit criteria values in the output such as the chi-square test, RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, RMR, NFI and NNFI.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    87 views8 pages

    Analisis CFA by Lisrel

    Uploaded by

    Atoillah Isvandiary
    The document presents the results of analyzing a correlation matrix using structural equation modeling in LISREL. It includes output showing the parameter specifications, estimates, fit statistics and other results. It evaluates whether the SEM model is appropriate based on several fit criteria values in the output such as the chi-square test, RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, RMR, NFI and NNFI.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 8

    TI

    DA NI=9 NO=120 NG=1 MA=KM


    LA
    ALBUMIN GLOBULIN ALE SELNM IGG IGM NKCELL CD4 CD8
    KM
    1.00
    0.88 1.00
    0.42 0.51 1.00
    0.73 0.71 0.45 1.00
    0.81 0.77 0.51 0.72 1.00
    0.87 0.74 0.25 0.55 0.70 1.00
    -0.23 -0.09 -0.22 -0.21 -0.15 -0.24 1.00
    0.80 0.68 0.16 0.64 0.61 0.75 -0.18 1.00
    0.82 0.78 0.34 0.70 0.71 0.63 -0.21 0.67 1.00
    ME
    2.56 2.33 34.80 64.16 219.38 215.44 273.78 740.22 772.00
    SE
    56891234/
    MO NX=4 NY=4 NK=1 NE=2 LY=FU,FI LX=FU,FI BE=FU,FI GA=FU,FI PH=SY,FR PS=DI,FR
    TE=DI,FR TD=DI,FR
    LE
    seluler antibody
    LK
    nutrien
    FR LY(1,2) LY(2,2) LY(3,1) LY(4,1) LX(1,1) LX(2,1) LX(3,1) LX(4,1) GA(1,1)
    FR GA(2,1)
    PD
    OU ME=ML IT=250

    DATE: 12/10/2013
    TIME: 6:09

    L I S R E L 8.30
    BY
    Karl G. Jreskog & Dag Srbom

    This program is published exclusively by


    Scientific Software International, Inc.
    7383 N. Lincoln Avenue, Suite 100
    Chicago, IL 60646-1704, U.S.A.
    Phone: (800)247-6113, (847)675-0720, Fax: (847)675-2140
    Copyright by Scientific Software International, Inc., 1981-99
    Use of this program is subject to the terms specified in the
    Universal Copyright Convention.
    Website: www.ssicentral.com
    The following lines were read from file C:\LISREL83\TUGAS.LPJ:
    TI
    DA NI=9 NO=120 NG=1 MA=KM
    LA
    ALBUMIN GLOBULIN ALE SELNM IGG IGM NKCELL CD4 CD8
    KM
    1.00
    0.88 1.00
    0.42 0.51 1.00
    0.73 0.71 0.45 1.00
    0.81 0.77 0.51 0.72 1.00
    0.87 0.74 0.25 0.55 0.70 1.00
    -0.23 -0.09 -0.22 -0.21 -0.15 -0.24 1.00
    0.80 0.68 0.16 0.64 0.61 0.75 -0.18 1.00
    0.82 0.78 0.34 0.70 0.71 0.63 -0.21 0.67 1.00
    ME
    2.56 2.33 34.80 64.16 219.38 215.44 273.78 740.22 772.00
    SE
    56891234/
    MO NX=4 NY=4 NK=1 NE=2 LY=FU,FI LX=FU,FI BE=FU,FI GA=FU,FI PH=SY,FR PS=DI,FR
    TE=DI,FR TD=DI,FR
    LE
    seluler antibody
    LK
    nutrien
    FR LY(1,2) LY(2,2) LY(3,1) LY(4,1) LX(1,1) LX(2,1) LX(3,1) LX(4,1) GA(1,1)
    FR GA(2,1)
    PD
    OU ME=ML IT=250
    TI
    Number of Input Variables 9

    Number of Y - Variables 4
    Number of X - Variables 4
    Number of ETA - Variables 2
    Number of KSI - Variables 1
    Number of Observations 120
    TI
    Correlation Matrix to be Analyzed
    IGG
    IGM
    CD4
    CD8 ALBUMIN GLOBULIN
    -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------IGG
    1.00
    IGM
    0.70
    1.00
    CD4
    0.61
    0.75
    1.00
    CD8
    0.71
    0.63
    0.67
    1.00
    ALBUMIN
    0.81
    0.87
    0.80
    0.82
    1.00
    GLOBULIN
    0.77
    0.74
    0.68
    0.78
    0.88
    1.00
    ALE
    0.51
    0.25
    0.16
    0.34
    0.42
    0.51
    SELNM
    0.72
    0.55
    0.64
    0.70
    0.73
    0.71
    Correlation Matrix to be Analyzed
    ALE
    SELNM
    -------- -------ALE
    1.00
    SELNM
    0.45
    1.00

    TI
    Parameter Specifications
    LAMBDA-Y
    seluler antibody
    -------- -------IGG
    0
    0
    IGM
    0
    1
    CD4
    0
    0
    CD8
    2
    0
    LAMBDA-X
    nutrien
    -------ALBUMIN
    3
    GLOBULIN
    4
    ALE
    5
    SELNM
    6
    GAMMA
    nutrien
    -------seluler
    7

    antibody

    PSI
    Note: This matrix is diagonal.
    seluler antibody
    -------- -------9
    10
    THETA-EPS
    IGG
    IGM
    CD4
    CD8
    -------- -------- -------- -------11
    12
    13
    14
    THETA-DELTA
    ALBUMIN GLOBULIN
    ALE
    -------- -------- -------- -------15
    16
    17
    18

    TI
    Number of Iterations = 12
    LISREL Estimates (Maximum Likelihood)
    LAMBDA-Y
    seluler antibody
    -------- -------IGG
    -0.82
    (0.62)
    1.32
    IGM

    --

    0.86
    (0.65)
    1.32

    CD4

    0.81
    (9.19)
    0.09

    --

    CD8

    0.83
    (9.48)
    0.09

    --

    LAMBDA-X
    nutrien
    -------ALBUMIN
    0.99
    (0.07)

    SELNM

    15.00
    GLOBULIN
    0.89
    (0.07)
    12.51
    ALE

    0.43
    (0.09)
    4.90

    SELNM
    0.75
    (0.08)
    9.58

    GAMMA
    nutrien
    -------seluler
    1.00
    (11.39)
    0.09
    antibody
    1.01
    (0.77)
    1.32

    Covariance Matrix of ETA and KSI


    seluler antibody nutrien
    -------- -------- -------seluler
    1.00
    antibody
    1.01
    1.00
    nutrien
    1.00
    1.01
    1.00
    PHI
    nutrien
    -------1.00

    PSI
    Note: This matrix is diagonal.
    seluler antibody
    -------- -------0.00
    -0.03

    Squared Multiple Correlations for Structural Equations


    seluler antibody
    -------- -------1.00
    1.03

    THETA-EPS
    IGG
    IGM
    CD4
    CD8
    -------- -------- -------- -------0.33
    0.27
    0.35
    0.31
    (0.05) (0.04) (0.05) (0.05)
    6.63
    5.97
    6.40
    6.00

    Squared Multiple Correlations for Y - Variables


    IGG
    IGM
    CD4
    CD8
    -------- -------- -------- -------0.67
    0.73
    0.65
    0.69
    THETA-DELTA
    ALBUMIN GLOBULIN
    ALE
    -------- -------- -------- -------0.02
    0.20
    0.81
    0.44
    (0.01) (0.03) (0.11) (0.06)
    1.86
    7.00
    7.68
    7.52

    SELNM

    Squared Multiple Correlations for X - Variables


    ALBUMIN GLOBULIN
    ALE
    -------- -------- -------- -------0.98
    0.80
    0.19
    0.56

    SELNM

    Goodness of Fit Statistics


    Degrees of Freedom = 18
    Minimum Fit Function Chi-Square = 104.83 (P = 0.00)
    Normal Theory Weighted Least Squares Chi-Square = 112.54 (P = 0.00)
    Estimated Non-centrality Parameter (NCP) = 94.54
    90 Percent Confidence Interval for NCP = (64.74 ; 131.85)
    Minimum Fit Function Value = 0.88
    Population Discrepancy Function Value (F0) = 0.79
    90 Percent Confidence Interval for F0 = (0.54 ; 1.11)
    Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.21
    90 Percent Confidence Interval for RMSEA = (0.17 ; 0.25)
    P-Value for Test of Close Fit (RMSEA < 0.05) = 0.00
    Expected Cross-Validation Index (ECVI) = 1.25
    90 Percent Confidence Interval for ECVI = (1.00 ; 1.56)
    ECVI for Saturated Model = 0.61
    ECVI for Independence Model = 8.11
    Chi-Square for Independence Model with 28 Degrees of Freedom = 949.42
    Independence AIC = 965.42
    Model AIC = 148.54
    Saturated AIC = 72.00

    Independence CAIC = 995.72


    Model CAIC = 216.72
    Saturated CAIC = 208.35
    Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) = 0.066
    Standardized RMR = 0.066
    Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.81
    Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.62
    Parsimony Goodness of Fit Index (PGFI) = 0.40
    Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.89
    Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI) = 0.85
    Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI) = 0.57
    Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.91
    Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.91
    Relative Fit Index (RFI) = 0.83
    Critical N (CN) = 40.51

    The Problem used

    12312 Bytes (= 0.0% of Available Workspace)

    Time used:

    0.020 Seconds

    Layak tidaknya model SEM untuk digunakan dapat diketahui dengan


    memperhatikan model fit criteria (Schumacher dan Lomax, 2004)
    seperti yang dihasilkan dari syntax running LISREL di atas,
    diantaranya adalah :
    1.

    Menggunakan Chi-Square goodness of fit test, dengan


    membandingkan statistik ujinya dengan nilai tabel chi-square
    atau lebih mudahnya dengan melihat nilai p-value (output). Jika
    p-value kurang dari significant level (misal 0,05) maka dapat
    disimpulkan bahwa model fit atau cocok dengan model teorinya,
    dalam kasus ini dapat diketahui bahwa statistik uji Chi-square
    nya bernilai 112,54 dengan derajat bebas 16 atau p-value nya
    0,000. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model SEM di atas fit
    (cocok) secara statistik pada significant level 10%.

    2.

    Memperhatikan nilai root-mean-square error of approximation


    (RMSEA), jika nilainya kurang dari 0,05 maka model layak

    untuk digunakan. Pada kasus ini dapat diketahui bahwa nilai


    RMSEA nya 0,210 yang nilainya lebih dari 0,05 dengan
    demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa model SEM di atas kurang
    layak untuk digunakan
    3.

    Nilai GFI = 0.81dan AGFI = 0.62 berada diantara di antara nilai 0


    dan 1 dan di atas 0,90. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa model SEM
    fit/cocok dengan datanya.

    4.

    Model disimpulkan fit dengan data jika nilai RMR kurang dari
    atau sama dengan 0. Pada Output terlihat nilai RMR dan
    standardized RMR sebesar 0.066 sehingga menunjukkan bahwa
    model fit dan layak untuk digunakan

    5.

    Model dikatakan fit jika nilai NFI dan NNFI lebih dari 0.90. Dari
    output terlihat nilai NFI = 0.89 dan nilai NNFI = 0,85.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy