Optical Properties of Poly (Vinyl Chloride) /polystyrene Blends
Optical Properties of Poly (Vinyl Chloride) /polystyrene Blends
Optical Properties of Poly (Vinyl Chloride) /polystyrene Blends
=(2.303A)/t (1)
Where A: is the absorption of the material.
t: is the sample's thickness (cm).
Figure (2) show the relationship of the absorption coefficient with wave length of different weight percentages of
PVC/PS blends, it show light absorption edge for PVC, while it became less for PS.
Figure. (2): UV/Visible absorption coefficient of (PVC/PS) with wavelength at different concentration
The refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (K) were calculated from the following equations, (eqs. (2 and 3)), and
plotted in figs. (3 and 4)[13, 15]:
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering& Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2014 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2014 Page 63
1 1
1 4
2 2
R K R
R R
n
(2)
R: is the optical reflectance.
Figure (3) shows the variation of refractive index (n) as a function of wave length. In order to compare our results of
refractive index for PS with the published data, which were calculated at 600 nm. The value of (n) was found to be (1.85)
for thickness (20 m), while Ahmed et al [16], obtained the value of (n=2.13) with thickness (100 m) and Papanu et al
[17] obtained (n=1.48) with thickness (1m) deposited on silicon wafer. The difference in (n) value is attributed to the
different in thickness.
Figure (3): variation of refractive index for (PVC/PS) blend with wave length.
Figure (4) shows the variation of extinction coefficient ( ) with wave length (). The blend (50% PVC / 50% PS)
concentration has the highest value of (K) and it was displaced toward the long wavelength.
Figure (4): variation of extinction coefficient for (PVC/PS) blend with wavelength.
Table (1) : The parameters of optical constants for polymer blend (PVC / PS)
4- Conclusion
1- Strong absorption clear between (200 290) nm.
2- 50% PVC / 50% PS blend showed the best optical properties.
3- The absorption coefficient, extinction coefficient, refractive index for (50% PVC / 50% PS) show significant
change from samples in compared with other blend samples.
Polymer. system
(cm
-1
)
n 10
-4
K
PVC 172 2.01 3
75% PS/ 25% PVC 213 1.17 4.9
50% PS/ 50% PVC 186 1.82 4.3
25% PS/ 75% PVC 187 1.8 4.18
PS 240 1.3 5.9
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering& Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2014 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2014 Page 64
References
[1] D.H. Baik, G.L. Kim, Y.H. Park, Y. Lee and Y. Son, Effect of polymer blending on the electrical conductivity of
polypyrrole/copolyesters composite films, Polymer Bulletin,Vol. 41, pp. 713-719, (1998).
[2] A.Z. Aroguz and B.M. Baysal, Thermal, Mechanical and Morphological Characterization Studies of Poly (2, 6-
dimethyl1, 4-phenylene oxide) Blends with Polystyrene and Brominated Polystyrene, J. App. Polym. Sci., Vol. 75,
pp. 225 231, (2000).
[3] R. Chakrabarti, M. Das and D. Chakraborty, Physical, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of PVC/PMMA Blends
in Relation to Their Morphologies, J. App. Polym. Sci., Vol. 93, pp. 2721-2730, (2004).
[4] P. Raghu, C.K. Nere and R.N. Gagtap, Effect of Styrene-Isoprene-Styrene, Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene, and Styrene-
Butadiene-Rubber on the Mechanical, Thermal, Rheological and Morphological Properties of
Polypropylene/Polystyrene Blends, J. App. Polym. Sci., Vol. 88, pp. 266-277, (2003).
[5] M.Y. Gelfer, H.H. Song, L. Liu, B.S. Hsiaol, B. Chul, M.Rafailovich, and V.Zaitsev, Effects of Organoclays on
Morphology and Thermal and Rheological Properties of Polystyrene and Poly (methyl methacrylate) Blends, J.
Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Physics, Vol. 41, pp. 4454, (2003).
[6] S. Shabbir, S. Zulfiqar, I. Lieberwirth, A. Kausar and M.I. Sarwar, Compatibilizing Effect of Functionalized
Polystyrene Blends: A Study of Morphology, Thermal and Mechanical Properties, Surf. Interface Anal., Vol. 40, pp.
906913, (2008).
[7] Q. Wang, B.k. Storn, Polymer Testing, Vol. 24, pp. 290, (2005).
[8] SH. Deshmukh, DK. Burghate, SN. Shilaskar, GN. Chaudhari and P. Deshmukh, Indian Journal of Pure and Applied
Physics, Vol. 46, pp. 344-348, (2008).
[9] D. Burghate, A. Bobade, L. Joshi, V.P. Akhare, P.T. Deshmukh, M.S. Deshmukh and S. Shilaskar, J. Polym. Mater.
Vol. 26, (2009).
[10] L.Joshi, M. Deshmukh, P. Deshmukh, D. Burghate and S. Shilaskar, J. Polym. Mater. Vol. 28, pp. 93-100, (2011).
[11] V. Sangawar and N. Moharil, Chemical Science Transactions, Vol. 1, pp. 447-455, (2012).
[12] G. Patel, M. Sureshkumar and P. Patel, Kerala, (India), AIP Conf. Proc. 1391, 645, (2011).
[13] J. Pankov, Optical Processes in Semiconductors. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, (1971).
[14] N.F. Mott, E.A. Davis, Electronic Process in Non-Crystalline Materials (second edition). UK: Clarendon Press
Oxford, (1979).
[15] M. Balkanski, Optical Properties of Solids, Vol. 2, Amsterdam, New York. Oxford, (1992).
[16] A. Ahmed, a. Awatif and N. Majied, Eng. And Technology, Vol. 25, pp.558, (2007).
[17] J. Popanu, D. Hess, D. Soane and A.T. Bell, Polym. Sci., Vol.39, pp. 303, (1990).