Outline For OBLICON 0809
Outline For OBLICON 0809
Outline For OBLICON 0809
2. Leung Ben v O’Brien: W/N to restore money lost at gaming is an obligation, it is.
3. Dela Cruz v Northern Theatrical Enterprise: employers are not legally bound to give legal assistance to
employees
b. CONTRACTS (ART1159) – arise from stipulations of the parties: meeting of the minds / formal agreement
1. Gaw v IAC: once the terms of an agreement have been reduced, its deemed to contain all terms, nothing
more.
2. Perla Compania de Seguros, Inc v CA: terms of the contract constitute the measure of the insurer’s
liability & compliance therewith is a condition precedent to the insured’s right to recover from the insurer.
3. Telefast Coms v Castro: (ART1170) “…in the performance of their obligation guilty of…delay…liable for
damages”
4. RCPI v CA: (ART1170) “…guilty of negligence…” gross negligence of employees involving telegrams
c. QUASI-CONTRACTS (ART1160) - arise from lawful, voluntary and unilateral acts and which are enforceable to
the end that no one shall be unjustly enriched or benefited at the expense of another
1. Negotorium gestio (ART.2144): somebody voluntarily manages the property of another without their
consent
3. Equitable PCI Bank v Ong: unjust enrichment of respondent & awarding of damages by fault of petitioner
bank
4. Lacson v Lacson: express demand for familial support is not necessary as it is inherent upon the father to
do so
5. Sps. Villalva v RCBC Savings Bank: spouses were not unjustly enriched; fault of bank
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
d. DELICT(ART1161, 2206) - arise from civil liability which is the consequence of a criminal offense
1. People v Sendaydiego:
2. People v Bayotas: ART89(1) “death of convict…liability is extinguished if death occurred before final
judgment”
3. Sarmiento v CA: civil action may proceed independently of the criminal proceedings
e. QUASI-DELICTS (ART1162, 2176) - arise from damage caused to another through an act or omission, there
being no fault or negligence, but no contractual relation exists between the parties
1. Elcano v Hill: acquittal from a criminal case does not bar a civil action for damages
2. Diana v Batangas Transaction Co.: a quasi-delict is a separate legal institution under the Civil Code
• Tradicio longa manu; it takes place by mere consent or agreement of the contracting parties as when the
vendor merely points to the thing sold shall thereafter be at the control and disposal of the vendee
• Tradicio brevi manu: delivery by the short hand; that kind of delivery whereby a possessor of a thing not
as an owner, becomes the possessor as owner. (ei. Tenant buys the house he is renting)
• Constitutum possessorium: opposite of brevi manu; the delivery whereby a possessor of a thing as an
owner, retains possession no longer as an owner, but in some other capacity.
Leonco v Go Inqui:
b. Prestation TO DO
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
1. Duties of a debtor in a prestation to do (ART1167)
i. Creditor may do it or another person, at the expense of the debtor
ii. Indemnification for damages
Chavez v Gonzales: (ART1170) negligence and delay of Gonzales to repair the typewriter
c. Prestation NOT TO DO
1. Duty of a debtor in a prestation not to do (ART1168)
i. Remedy to undo what was done plus damages
ii. Indemnification for damages
d. DELAY (ART1169) - default or tardiness in the performance of an obligation after it has been due and demandable
• Mora solvendi– delay on the part of the debtor to fulfill his obligation
• Mora accipiendi– delay on the part of the creditor to accept the performance of the obligation
Exceptions:
i. Obligation or law expressly declares
CIR v Yuseco: tax case; when it is expressed by law, nonpayment of tax on time incurs in delay
• SSS v Moonwalk Dev’t and Housing Co.: no demand, no delay; once debtor’s debts extinguished it can’t be retracted
• de la Rosa v BPI: mere contest rules does not have a binding power like a contract
• Smith, Bell & CFO v Sotelo Matti: conditional contract; ART1174 forces majeure, petitioner not liable
• Palmartes v CA: Suretyship & Guaranty. Surety: an insurer of the debt; Guarantor: an insurer of the solvency of the debtor
Suretyship: an undertaking that the debt shall be paid; Guaranty: undertaking that the debtor shall pay
i. Kinds of Damages:
• Actual (ART2199): pecuniary loss; indemnification…also of profits which the obligee failed to obtain (2200)
• Moral (ART2217): include physical suffering, mental anguish, etc; incapable of pecuniary computation
• Nominal (ART2221): adjudicated in order that a right which was violated, be vindicated and recognized
• Temperate (ART2224):may be recovered when the court finds that some pecuniary loss has been suffered
• Liquidated (ART2226): those agreed upon by the parties to a contract, to be paid in case of breach
• Exemplary (ART 2229): corrective damages; way of example to the public good
Rakes v Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co: contributory neg; neglience not the determining cause of the accident
3. Reciprocal Obligations
Tanguilig v CCA: ART 1174 is untenable, fault of petitioner why the windmill collapsed
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
e. Fortuitous events (ART1174)
CASES:
• UST v Descals: the deterioration of the house was foreseen, thus its destruction was caused by forces majeure
• Nakpil v CA: building collapsed due to faulty, substandard materials, architects & contactors liable under ART1723
• Victorias Planters Assoc v Victorias Milling Co.: WWII; period stipulated in contract doesnt stop while obligation is suspended
• Sweet Lines v CA: bypassed of a port; mechanical defects not considered as forces majeure, petitioner acted in bad faith
VI. Transmission of Rights (ART1178): genrule: rights acquired through an obligation, are transmissible in character.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
VII. Different Kinds of Obligations
a. PURE OBLIGATION (ART1179)
DEFINTION: obligation which doesn’t contain any condition or term upon which the fulfillment is made to depend;
immediately demandable
CASES:
• Pay v Vda. De Palance:
b. CONDITIONAL OBLIGATION
DEFINITION: an obligation subject to a condition; not immediately demandable
1. Suspensive condition (ART1181): its fulfillment gives rise to an obligation; the demandability of the
obligation or the effectivity of the contract can take place only after the condition has been fulfilled
• Taylor v Uy Tieng Piao: employment was terminated because of a resolutory condition in the
contract
2. Resolutory condition (ART1181): its happening extinguishes the obligation which is already existing
3. Potestative condition –sole will of the debtor, it is void; if at the creditor’s, still valid.
4. Casual condition – the condition depends upon chance or the will of a third person; chance or will of third
person
5. Mixed condition – partly upon will of a party and partly upon chance or will of a third person (ART1182)
• Romero v CA:
6. Possible condition (ART1183): capable of actualization according to nature, law, public policy or good
customs
7. Impossible condition (ART1183): the obligor knows his obligation cannot be fulfilled
8. Positive condition (ART1184): refers to the fulfillment of an event or performance of an act
9. Negative condition (ART1185): refers to the non-fulfillment or non-performance of an act
10. Divisible condition: when the condition is susceptible of partial realization
11. Indivisible condition: when the condition is not susceptible of partial realization
12. Conjunctive condition: when there are several conditions, all of which must be realized
13. Alternative condition: when there are several conditions, but only one must be realized
** Rules in Case of Improvement, Loss, Deterioration of the thing during pendency of condition (art1189)
** Power to RESCIND (ART1191)
CASES:
• Marin v Adil:
• Seva v Berwin:
c. OBLIGATIONS WITH A PERIOD – a future and certain event upon the arrival of which the obligation is subjected to
1. Suspensive period [ex die ] – obligation arises when an event occurs
• Gaite v Fonacier: plaintiff lost his benefit of the period as given in 1198
**When debtor loses benefit of period (ART1198): insolvency; no surety/guaranty; by his own acts; he absconds
d. ALTERNATIVE OBLIGATIONS: the debtor is required to fulfill only one of several prestations to extinguish the obligation
**Rule if some or all objects are lost or destroyed:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
Qualify if right of choice belongs to debtor or creditor
• Legarda v Miailhe:
e. FACULTATIVE OBLIGATION: the debtor is bound to perform only one prestation, with a reserved right to choose another
prestation as SUBSTITUTE for the principal
**Rule if principle or substitute is lost
CASES:
• PNB v Sta. Maria:
• Republic v CA:
• Ronquillo v CA:
** connect with ART94 AND 121, Family Code: ARTS. 1822, 1823, 1894, 1895, 2146, 2194
- Penalty will substitute the indemnity for damages and the payment of interests in case of non-compliance;
- Penalty may be enforced only when it is demandable in accordance with the provisions of this Code;
- ART1230: nullity of penal clause doesn’t carry with it the principal ob; nullity of principal ob carries with it the
penal c.
i. Principal obligation: one which can stand by itself and doesn’t depend for its validity and existence
ii. Accessory obligation: one which is attached to a principal obligation and it can’t stand alone
PURPOSE:
i. To insure performance
ii. To substitute a penalty for the indemnity for damages
iii. To punish debtor for non-fulfillment
iv. Reparation and Punishment
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
the parties breach clause can be
enforced
CASES:
• Lambert v Fox:
CASES:
• Panganiban v Cuevas:
• BaPI v CA:
**Read RA 8183: repealed RA529 “An Act to Assure the Uniform Value of Philippine Coin and Currency”
CASES:
• Caltex v IAC:
• Bustamante v Rosel:
• Far East Bank v Diaz Realty:
Persons from whom creditor must accept payment (1236) Persons to whom payment by debtor shall be made (1240)
DEBTOR CREDITOR
Any third person who has an interest His successor in interest (heirs)
Any third person who has NO interest Any person authorized to receive it
REQUISITES:
- ONE debtor and ONE creditor
- Two or more debts
- Debts must be the same kind
- The debts to which payment made by the debtor has been applied must be due
- Payment made must not be sufficient to cover all the debts
iii. Payment by cession (ART1255): it is the assignment or abandonment of all the properties of the debtor for
the benefit of the creditors.
REQUISITES:
- TWO or more CREDITORS
- Debtor must be (partially) INSOLVENT
- The cession must be accepted by the creditors
Consignation: the act of depositing the thing amount due with the proper court when the creditor does not
desire or cannot receive it; always judicial
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
REQUISITES FOR A VALID TENDER OF PAYMENT:
- Tender of payment must comply with the rules on payment
- It must be unconditional and for the whole amount.
- It must be actually made.
**tender of payment not necessary before the debtor can consign the thing due with the court
**prior notice to persons interested is required otherwise it is void (ART 1257)
**consignation, by depositing the thing/sum due with the proper judicial authority, is necessary to effect payment.
**consignation is for the benefit of the creditor
• Soco v Militante: irregular payment of rent w/o receipts by respondent who also violated the contract
b. Lost of thing due (ART1262): when it PERISHES, goes out of commerce, disappears & its existence is unknown
** partial loss of a specific thing, the court is given the discretion in case of disagreement between the parties
**presumption of fault in case of loss of thing in possession of debtor, except in natural calamities.
**IMPOSSIBILITY: Legal impossibility (ART1266); and physical impossibility (ART1267)
c. Condonation or Remission (ART1270): is the gratuitous abandonment by the creditor of his right against the debtor
REQUISITES:
- It must be gratuitous
- It must be accepted by the obligor
- The parties must have capacity
- It must not be excessive
- If expressly: must comply with the forms of donations
Kinds of Remission
- Extent: partial and complete
- Form: express and implied
- Date of effectivity: inter vivos and mortis causa
**ART1273. The renunciation of the principal debt shall extinguish the accessory obligations; but waiver of the
latter shall leave the former in force.
d. Merger/Confusion (ART1275): the characters of creditor and debtor are merged in the same person.
Requisites of confusion:
- Takes place between the principal debt and creditor
- It must be complete
A owes-> B owes -> C owes -> D owes -> A, A is now extinguished of his liability as A can’t be debtor-creditor of one’s self
• Chittick v CA:
e. Compensation (ART1278): the parties become debtor and creditor of each other. [A(d) owes B(c), later B(d) owes A(c)]
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
Compensation is the extinguishment to the concurrent amount of the debts of two persons who, in their own right, are
debtors and creditors of each other; it involves the simultaneous balancing of two obligations; cancelling out each other.
Kinds of compensation:
Extent
- Total: both obligations are extinguished (ART1281)
- Partial: obligations of different amounts and a balance remains
Origin
- Legal: by operation of law (ARTS1279, 1290)
- Judicial: by court order in a litigation (ART1283)
- Voluntary: by agreement of the parties (ART1282)
- Facultative: can be set up only by one of the parties (ART1287[1], 1288)
CASES:
• Soriano v Compana General de Tabacos de Filipinas:
• Compania Maritima v CA:
ELEMENTS:
- Valid contract
- Change of debtor by guarantor
- Subrogation of the rights of the creditor to another
- Valid NEW contract
KINDS OF NOVATION:
ORIGIN:
- Conventional: agreement of the parties (ART1301; 1302, 1224)
- Legal: operation of law (ART 1300, 1302)
CONSTITUTION:
- Express: declared in unequivocal terms
- Implied: the old and the new obligations are essentially incompatible with each other
EFFECT:
- Total or extinctive: old obligation completely extinguished (ART1303)
- Partial or modificatory: old obligation merely modified (ART1304)
SUBJECT:
- Real or objective: change of subject/thing
- Personal or subjective: change/substitution of debtor/creditor
a. Substitution: debtor is substituted (ART1291[2])
i. Expromision: third person doesn’t notify the original/against the will of debtor
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
ii. Delegacion: creditor accepts the third person in place of the debtor; all must
agree
CASES:
• Ajax Marketing v CA:
• Garcia v CA:
• Lim Tay v CA:
• Chempil v CA:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
CONTRACTS
I. DEFINTION OF CONTRACT (1305): it is a meeting of minds between two persons whereby one binds himself, with
respect to
the other, to give something or to render some service.
a. Elements of a contract
1. Essential
i. Common (comunes): those present in all contracts >consent, object, subject, and cause
ii. Special (especiales): present only in certain contracts > delivery in real contracts or form in solemn
contracts
iii. Extraordinary or peculiar (especialisimos): peculiar to a specific contract > i.e. price in contract of sale
2. Natural – derived from the nature of the contract; they are presumed by law.
3. Accidental – those which exist only when parties expressly provide for theem for the purpose of limiting or
modifying the normal effects of the contract; i.e. conditions, terms, or modes.
b. Characteristics of a contract
1. The obligatory force or character of contracts (obligatoriedad del contrato)
2. The autonomy of contracts
3. The mutuality of contracts, or what amounts to the same thing, the essential equality of the contracting parties
4. The relativity of contracts (relatividad del contrato) (1311)
c. Classifications of contract
1. According to their relation to other contracts 5. According to their subject matter
a. Preparatory a. Things
b. Principal b. Services
c. Accessory c. Rights
Contracts must not be contrary to: law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy (1306)
Limitations: LAW and POLICE POWER (^morals, etc ^)
Innominate contracts (1307)
o Do ut des (I give that you may o Facto ut des (I do that you may give)
give) o Facto ut facias (I do that you may do)
o Do ut facias (I give that you may
do)
d. Persons affected by a contract (ART1311): Contracting parties; their assigns, and heirs (GENRULE)
- Exceptions (not transmissible): nature, stipulation, and provisions of law
- Strangers or third persons may not be affected by a contract, EXCEPT:
Contracts containing a stipulation in favor of a third person (stipulation pour auturi) (1311[2])
o Stipulation intended for the sole benefit of the third person, “donee beneficiary”
o Obligation is due from the promisee to the third person, “creditor beneficiary”
o REQUISITES OF Stipulation Pour Auturi
1)
Contracting parties by their stipulation must have clearly and deliberately conferred a
favor upon a third person
2) The third person must have communicated his acceptance to the obligor before its
revocation by the obligee or the original parties
3) The stipulation in favor of the third person should be a part, not the whole, of the
contract
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
4) The favorable stipulation should not be conditioned or compensated by any kind of
obligation
5) Neither of the contracting parties bears the legal representation or authorization of the
third party for otherwise, the rules on agency will apply
1. CONSENT (ARTS 1319-1346): is the conformity or concurrence of wills; it is the agreement of the will of one
contracting party with that of another, upon the object and terms of the contract.
Acceptance: the manifestation of acceptance of the offer; w/o acceptance = no contract; it must be absolute
(1320) an acceptance may be express or implied
Forms of acceptance:
- Express acceptance: oral or written
- Implied acceptance: inferred from act or conduct
Offer: the proposal made by one party to another to enter into a contract; offer must be certain
(1321): the offerer may fix the time, place, and manner of acceptance – all of which must be complied with
Causes of Ineffective Offers (1323): Insanity, Death, Civil Interdiction, Insolvency (IDCII)
Other causes of IO: expiration of period to accept offer (1324); destruction of the thing before acceptance (1262)
ART1325. Business ads of things for sale are not definite offers, but mere invitations to make an offer
ART1326. Ads for bidders are simply invitations
ART1330. …consent is given through mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence, or fraud is voidable.
Characteristics of Consent: Intelligent, Free and voluntary, Conscious or spontaneous IFC
Vices of Consent
- Error or mistake (1331): false notion of a thing or a fact material to the contract; mistake of fact &
mistake of law
Mistake of fact: substance of the thing; conditions which principally moved the parties; identity or qualifications
Mistake of law: ignorance of law or erroneous interpretation of its meaning; it doesn’t invalidate (ART3, CC)
EXCEPT: mistake regarding object not of principal consideration ->unless cause by fraud;
mistake as to quantity or amount ->only correction
error as regards the motives of the contract ->unless it’s the condition
mistake as regards the identity or qualifications ->unless it requires personal qualifications
- Mutual error (1334): mistake of fact; EXCEPT when it arises out of a question of law, construction, or
application.
- Violence or force (1335): violence requires the employment of physical force; external
- Intimidation, threat, or duress (1335): reasonable, imminent and grave, evil upon his person/property;
internal
EXCEPT: reverential fear: fear of displeasing a person to whom respect is due = contract valid
Threat of a court action: it is justifies as a means to enforce a just or legal claim
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
12 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
- Undue influence (1337): influence overpowers the mind of a party; if gained by kindness = not vitiate
consent
- Fraud or deceit (1338): causal fraud committed by one party to induce the other to consent;
misrepresentation
ABSOLUTE: takes place when the parties do not intend to be bound at all (1345); a fictitious contract = void (1346)
RELATIVE: the parties conceal their true agreement (1345); it does not prejudice a third person and is not intended
for any purpose contrary to law, it binds the parties to their real agreement (1346)
- Future inheritance is any property or right, not in existence at the time of the contract, that a person may
inherit.
- GENRULE: A contract concerning future inheritance is VOID, except when expressly authorized by law.
(1409[7])
3. CAUSE (ARTS 1350-1355): more proximate purpose which the contracting parties have in view at the time of
entering into the contract
Requisites of CAUSE:
- It must exist at the time the contract is entered into (1352, 1409[3])
- It must be lawful (1352)
- It must be true or real (1353)
CAUSE MOTIVE
Immediate or direct reason Remote or indirect reason
Always known to the other contracting party Motive is unknown
An essential element of a contract Not an essential element
Illegality of the cause affects the validity of a contract Illegality of one’s motive does not render the contract void
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
- Inadequacy of Cause is not a ground for relief (1355)
- Although the cause is not stated in the contract, it is presumed that it exists and is lawful, unless the debtor proves
the contrary. (1277)
- LESION (1355): is any damage caused by the fact that the price is unjust; doesn’t invalidate a contract, EXCEPT:
When there has been fraud, mistake, or undue influence (1355); In cases specified by law (1381)
III. Forms of contracts: refers to the manner in which a contract is executed or manifested; it could be oral, in writing, or mixed
ART1356. Contracts shall be obligatory, in whatever form they may have been entered into,
provided all the essential requisites for their validity are present. However, when the law requires
that a contract be in some form in order that it may be valid or enforceable, or that a contract be
proved in a certain way, that requirement is absolute and indispensable. In such cases, the right
of the parties stated in the following articles cannot be exercised.
ART1359. Where, there having been a meeting of the minds of the parties to a contract, their
true intention is not expressed in the instrument purporting to embody the agreement, by reason
of mistake, fraud, inequitable conduct or accident, one of the parties may ask for the reformation
of the instrument to the end that such true intention may be expressed.
If mistake, fraud, inequitable conduct, or accident has prevented a meeting of the minds of the
parties, the proper remedy is not reformation of the instrument but annulment of the contract.
ART1360. The New Civil Code prevails over the principles of the general law on reformation.
Requisites of reformation
- There is a meeting of the minds
- The written instrument does not express the true agreement or intention of the parties
- The failure to express the true intention is due to MFICA
- The facts upon which relief by way of reformation is sought are put in issue by pleadings
- There is a clear and convincing evidence of MFICA
Forms of reformation
ART1361. Mutual mistake of the parties causes the failure of the instrument to disclose their real agreement
REQUISITES: mistake of fact; mistake is mutual; mistake is clear and convincing; it caused the failure of the
instrument, EXCEPT: mistake of law >>annulment
ART1362. If one party was mistaken and the other acted fraudulently
ART1363. When one party was mistaken and the other knew or believed that the instrument did not state their
real agreement; concealment >> reformation
ART1364. Ignorance, lack of skill, negligence or bad faith on the part of the third person drafting the instrument
ART1365. If two parties agree upon the mortgage or pledge of real/personal property, but the instrument states
that the property is sold absolutely or with a right of repurchase
EXCEPTIONS
ART 1366. There shall be no reformation in the following cases:
1. Simple donations inter vivos no condition is imposed
wherein 2. Wills
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
3. When the real agreement is void
ART1367. When one of the parties has brought an action to enforce the instrument; based on estoppel (1431)
ART1369. The procedure for the reformation of instruments shall be governed by rules of court to be promulgated by
the Supreme Court.
V. Interpretation of contracts: the determination of the meaning of the terms or words used by the parties in their contract.
ART1370. If the terms of a contract are clear and leave no doubt upon the intention of the
contracting parties, the literal meaning of its stipulations shall control.
If the words appear to be contrary to the evident intention of the parties, the latter shall prevail
over the former. (intentions win over words)
Literal meaning controls when language is clear -> the question is not what existed in the minds, but the intention
1370: Evident intention of parties prevails over terms of contract
1371: In order to judge the intention…subsequent acts shall be principally considered
1372: Special intent prevails over a general intent when the two cannot stand together
1373:..stipulation of any contract should admit of several meanings..which is most adequate to render it effectual
1374: ..various stipulations of a contract shall be interpreted together..
1375: Word with different significations shall be understood it should keep within the meaning of the nature/object
1376: Resort to usage or customs as aid in interpretation when there are ambiguities of a contract
1377: Interpretation of obscure words not in favor of the party who caused it
1377: In case of doubt, a written agreement should be interpreted against the party who has drawn it
1378: Rules in case doubts are impossible to settle
o Gratuitous contract: incidental circumstances > interpretation be made to result in the least transmission of
rights and interest
o Onerous contract: doubts should be settled in favor of the greatest reciprocity of interests
o Principal object of the contract: doubt cant be resolved thereby leaving the intention of the parties unknown,
the contract shall be null and void
1379: The principles of interpretation stated in Rule123 of the Rules of Court shall also be observed in the
construction of contract
Contract of Guaranty: contract where a person called as guarantor, binds himself to a creditor to fulfill the obligation of the
principal debtor in case the latter should fail to do so.
Contract of Surety: contract where a person binds himself solidarily with the principal debtor to fulfill the obligation.
Benefit of Excussion: right by which the guarantor cannot be compelled to pay the creditor unless the latter has exhausted all the
property of the principal debtor, and has resorted to all of the legal remedies against such debtor.
EXCEPTIONS: ART2059: Benefit of Excussion inapplicable;
ART2071: Guarantor may proceed against principal debtor even before payment.
a. Rescissible contracts (1380) VALID until rescinded
All the essential requisites exist but by reason of injury/damage to one of the parties, contract may be rescinded
Rescission cannot be availed of if the party who demands it cannot return what he is obliged to restore (1385[1])
Rescission shall not take place if the property is legally in the possession of a third person who acted in good faith (1385[2])
ART1380. Contracts validly agreed upon may be rescissible in the cases established by law
ART1381. The following contracts are rescissible…
ART1382. Payments made in a state of insolvency for obligations to whose fulfillment the debtor could not be
compelled at the time of they were effected, are also rescissible.
ART1383. The action for rescission is subsidiary, can be instituted only when there are no other legal remedies left
ART1384. Rescission shall be only to the extent necessary to cover the damages caused
ART1385. Rescission creates obligation of mutual restitution; debtor & creditor must return to each other the things
ART1386. ART1381(1)(2) shall not take place with respect to contracts approved by the courts
ART1387. Alienation of properties presumed in fraud of creditors; alienation by gratuitous title & by onerous title
ART1388. Whoever acquires in bad faith the things alienated in fraud of creditors, shall indemnify the latter for damages
ART1389. The action to claim rescission must be commenced within four years;
guardianship/absentees: 4yrs from termination of incapacity / domicile is known
ART1390. The following contracts are voidable or annullable, even though there may have been no damage…
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
16 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
ART1391. Action for annulment shall be brought within four years:
In case of IVUI-TD; mistake of fraud: from discovery; minors & incapacitated: guardianship ceases
ART1392. Ratification extinguished the action to annul a voidable contract
ART1393. Ratification may be effected expressly or tacitly
ART1394. Ratification may be effected by the guardian of the incapacitated person
ART1395. Ratification does not require the conformity of the contracting party who had no right to bring action
ART1396. Ratification cleanses the contract from all its defects from the moment it was constituted
ART1397. Action for annulment of contracts may be instituted by all who are thereby obliged principally or
subsidiarily
ART1398. Obligation having been annulled, the contracting parties shall restore to each other everything
ART1399. The defect of the contract consists in the incapacity of one of the parties, the incapacitated person is not
obliged to make any restitution except insofar as he has been benefited by the thing or price received by him
ART1400. Effect of loss of thing to be returned: w/o fault = obligation extinguished; with fault = obligation still exist
ART1401. Action for annulment of contracts shall be extinguished when the thing which is the object is lost through
fraud/fault of the person who has a right to institute the proceedings.
ART1402. as long as one of the contracting parties doesn’t restore what is ordered, the other can’t be compelled to
comply with what is incumbent upon him
ART1403. The following contracts are unenforceable, unless they are RATIFIED:
(1). Those entered into the name of another person by one who had been given no authority or legal
representation, or who has acted beyond his powers;
ART1403 (2). Those that don’t comply with the Statute of Frauds as set forth in this number: unenforceable
a) An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed w/in a year from making thereof
b) A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another
c) An agreement made in consideration of marriage, other than a mutual promise to marry
d) An agreement for the sale of goods, chattels, or things in action, at a price not less than P500,
unless the buyer accepts and receive a part of such goods and chattels, or the evidences, or some of
them, of such things in action, or pay at the time some part of the purchase money; but when a sale is
made by auction and entry is made by the auctioneer in his sale book, at the time of the sale, of the
amount and the kind of property sold, terms of sale, price, names of the purchasers and persons on
whose account the sale is made, it is sufficient memorandum;
e) An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property or
an interest therein
f) A representation as to the credit of a third person
ART1403 (3). Those where both parties are incapable of giving consent to a contract
ART1404. Unauthorized contracts are governed by ART1317 and the principles of agency in Title X of this Book
ART1405. Contracts infringing the Statute of Frauds, referred to ART1403(2), are ratified by the failure to object to the
presentation of oral evidence to prove the same, or by the acceptance of benefits under them
ART1406. When a contract is enforceable under the Statute of Frauds, and a public document is necessary for its
registration in the Registry of Deeds, the parties may avail themselves of the right under ART1357
ART1407. Unenforceable contracts become
voidable: when parent or guardian ratifies the contract of incapable parties;
valid: parents or guardians of both able parties, ratify the contract, the contract is validated and retroacts
ART1408. Unenforceable contracts cannot be assailed by third persons
ART1410. The action or defense for the declaration of the inexistence of a contract does not prescribe
ART1411. Rules: contract is illegal & the act is a criminal offense > pari delicto: no action; 1 party guilty: other will claim
ART1412. If the act is which the unlawful or forbidden cause consists does not constitute a criminal offense, rules:
ART1413. Interest paid in excess of the interest allowed by the usury law may be recovered by the debtor, with interest
thereon from the date of the payment
ART1414. When money is paid or property delivered for an illegal purpose, the contract may be repudiated by one of the
parties before the purpose has been accomplished, or before any damage has been caused to a third person.
In such case, the courts may, if the public interest will thus be subserved, allow the party repudiating the
contract to recover the money or property
ART1415. Where one of the parties to an illegal contract is incapable of giving consent, the courts may, if the interest of
justice so demands, allow recovery of money or property delivered by the incapacitated person
ART1416. When the agreement is not illegal per se but is merely prohibited, an the prohibition by the law is designed for
the protection of the plaintiff, he may, if public policy is thereby enhanced, recover what he has paid or
delivered
ART1417. When the price of any article or commodity is determined by statute, or by authority of law, any person paying
any amount in excess of the maximum price allowed may recover such excess
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
17 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
ART1418. When the law fixes, or authorizes the fixing of the maximum number of hours of labor, and a contract is
entered into whereby laborer undertakes to work longer than the maximum thus fixed, he may demand
additional compensation for service rendered beyond the time limit
ART1419. When the law sets, or authorizes the setting of a minimum wage for laborers, and a contract is agreed upon by
which a laborer accepts a lower wage, he shall be entitled to recover the deficiency
ART1420. In case of a divisible contract, if the illegal terms can be separated from the legal ones, the latter may be
enforced
ART1421. The defense of illegality of contracts is not available to third persons whose interests are not directly affected
ART1422. A contract which is the direct result of a previous illegal contract, is also void and inexistent
Quick Notes
General Rule: No Demand, No Delay (1169) Articles that protect creditor from accepting
Solidary obligation is more onerous than a joint obligation substandard performance/ payment:
Obligation, presumption is always pro-debtor
1199(2): C can’t be compelled to receive part of one
Modes of Payment 1236: C may refuse payment by a third person
Joint and solidary: Plurality of Parties 1244: C can’t be compelled to receive a different thing
Obligation: with parties and prestation 1246: generic thing of medium quality
1248: C can’t be compelled to receive partial prestation
Obligation demandable at once:
When it is pure (1179[1])
When it is subject to a resolutory condition (1179[2])
When it is subject to a resolutory period (1193[2])
Contract, required it to be in writing for validity, convenience of the parties, and covered by the Statute of Frauds
Contract, needed to be in writing: real properties, personal properties, donation more than P500
SIMULATED CONTRACT(1345-1346): RELATIVE: valid; ABSOLUTE: parties really did not intend to be bound to each other
ESTOPPEL: it might refer to an action or word uttered where a third person shall relay on.
LACHES: “sleeping dragon”; a right to action is left unattended for a long period of time
MARRIAGE CONTRACT: special contract; can’t have other stipulations other than as provided in an ante-nuptial agreement
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
18 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
PRESTATION TO DO
DELAY (1169)
Civil law student fails to pay on time the remaining balance of his tuition. Is the student considered in
delay?
YES, ART 1169 exceptions paragraph 2 and 4 can apply. The date specified is a controlling factor, ad it is a reciprocal
obligation because the University already fulfilled their part of the obligation, thus it is incumbent upon the student to also perform
his part of the obligation, to pay for the tuition.
Boat capsized due to bad weather, many died. Owner of the ship allowed overloading of passengers.
Owner liable to pay for damages because of gross negligence.
OBLIGATIONS: INDIVISIBLE
Why are obligations presumed as joint obligations and not solidary obligation?
It is presumed because it is less burdensome.
EXTINGUISHMENT OF OBLIGATION
CONTRACTS
What does advertisements, like print ads about review classes, stand for?
The advertisement is an invitation to make an offer only as provided for in ART1325.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
19 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
1186. The condition shall be deemed fulfilled when the obligor voluntarily prevents its fulfillment.
REQUISITES:
• The condition is SUSPENSIVE;
• The obligor ACTUALLY PREVENTS the fulfillment of the condition;
• He acts VOLUNTARILY.
Malice or fraud is not required, as long as his purpose is to prevent the fulfillment of the condition.
No person shall profit by his own wrong.
1189. When the conditions have been imposed with the intention of suspending the efficacy of an obligation to give,
the following rules shall be observed in case of the improvement, loss or deterioration of the thing during the pendency
of the condition:
LOSS
• debtor without fault – obligation is extinguished
• debtor with fault – obligation to pay damages
DETERIORATION
• debtor without fault – impairment is to be borne by the creditor
• debtor with fault – creditor chooses: rescission of obligation, fulfillment, indemnity
IMPROVEMENT
• by nature or time – improvement: inure to the benefit of the creditor
• at the expense of the debtor – granted to the usufructuary
The court shall decree the rescission claimed, unless there be just cause authorizing the fixing of a period.
This is understood to be without prejudice to the rights of third persons who have acquired the thing, in accordance
with Articles 1385 and 1388 and the Mortgage Law.
1193. Obligations for whose fulfillment a day certain has been fixed, shall be demandable only when that day comes.
Obligations with a resolutory period take effect at once, but terminate upon arrival of the day certain.
A day certain is understood to be that which must necessarily come, although it may not be known when.
If the uncertainty consists in whether the day will come or not, the obligation is conditional, and it shall be regulated
by the rules of the preceding Section.
1195. Anything paid or delivered before the arrival of the period, the obligor being unaware of the period or believing
that the obligation has become due and demandable, may be recovered, with the fruits and interests.
Burden of proof lies on the DEBTOR, that he has no knowledge of the due period.
Debtor presumed aware of period
1196. Whenever in an obligation a period is designated, it is presumed to have been established for the benefit of both
the creditor and the debtor, unless from the tenor of the same or other circumstances it should appear that the period
has been established in favor of one or of the other.
General rule: benefit for both creditors and debtors
Exceptions:
1. Term is for the benefit of the debtor alone – cannot be compelled to pay prematurely, but he can if he desires to do so
2. Term is for the benefit of the creditor – may demand fulfillment even before the arrival of the term but the debtor
cannot require him to accept payment before the expiration of the stipulated period
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
20 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
1197. If the obligation does not fix a period, but from its nature and the circumstances it can be inferred that a period
was intended, the courts may fix the duration thereof.
The courts shall also fix the duration of the period when it depends upon the will of the debtor.
In every case, the courts shall determine such period as may under the circumstances have been probably
contemplated by the parties. Once fixed by the courts, the period cannot be changed by them.
1198. The debtor shall lose every right to make use of the period:
(1) When after the obligation has been contracted, he becomes insolvent, unless he gives a guaranty or security for the
debt;
(2) When he does not furnish to the creditor the guaranties or securities which he has promised;
(3) When by his own acts he has impaired said guaranties or securities after their establishment, and when through a
fortuitous event they disappear, unless he immediately gives new ones equally satisfactory;
(4) When the debtor violates any undertaking, in consideration of which the creditor agreed to the period;
(5) When the debtor attempts to abscond.
ALTERNATIVE OBLIGATIONS
1199. A person alternatively bound by different prestations shall completely perform one of them.
The creditor cannot be compelled to receive part of one and part of the other undertaking.
1200. The right of choice belongs to the debtor, unless it has been expressly granted to the creditor…
The debtor shall have no right to choose those prestations which are impossible, unlawful or which could not have
been the object of the obligation.
1201. The choice shall produce no effect except from the time it has been communicated.
1202. The debtor shall lose the right of choice when among the prestations whereby he is alternatively bound, only one
is practicable.
1203. If through the creditor's acts the debtor cannot make a choice according to the terms of the obligation, the latter
may rescind the contract with damages.
1204. The creditor shall have a right to indemnity for damages when, through the fault of the debtor, all the things
which are alternatively the object of the obligation have been lost, or the compliance of the obligation has become
impossible.
The indemnity shall be fixed taking as a basis the value of the last thing which disappeared, or that of the
service which last became impossible.
Damages other than the value of the last thing or service may also be awarded.
1210. The indivisibility of an obligation does not necessarily give rise to solidarity. Nor does solidarity of itself imply
indivisibility.
1211. Solidarity may exist although the creditors and the debtors may not be bound in the same manner and by the
same periods and conditions.
The solidarity of the debtors is not affected even if different terms and conditions are made applicable to them.
1213. A solidary creditor cannot assign his rights without the consent of the others.
The assignee does not become a solidary creditor, and any payment made upon him by the debtor does not extinguish the
obligation. He is considered a STRANGER, and his acts are not binding to the solidarity.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
21 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
1218. Payment by a solidary debtor shall not entitle him to reimbursement from his co-debtors if such payment is
made after the obligation has prescribed or become illegal.
No reimbursement if:
Obligation PRESCRIBES: The creditor did not make any demand for more than 10 years.
Obligation becomes ILLEGAL: Law has been passed, making such prestation illegal.
1219. The remission made by the creditor of the share 1220. The remission of the whole obligation, obtained by
which affects one of the solidary debtors does not release one of the solidary debtors, does not entitle him to
the latter from his responsibility towards the co-debtors, reimbursement from his co-debtors
in case the debt had been totally paid by anyone of them
before the remission was effected.
1221. Rule when thing has been lost or prestation became impossible
1225. For the purposes of the preceding articles, obligations to give definite things and those which are not susceptible
of partial performance shall be deemed to be indivisible.
When the obligation has for its object the execution of a certain number of days of work, the accomplishment of work
by metrical units, or analogous things which by their nature are susceptible of partial performance, it shall be divisible.
However, even though the object or service may be physically divisible, an obligation is indivisible if so provided by law
or intended by the parties.
In obligations not to do, divisibility or indivisibility shall be determined by the character of the prestation in each
particular case.
If the contract is divisible, and a part of it is illegal, the illegal part is void, and the rest shall be valid and enforceable.
If the contract is indivisible, and a part of it is illegal, the entire contract is void.
Partial performance of an indivisible obligation is tantamount to non-performance.
other causes of extinguishment of obligations, such as annulment, rescission, fulfillment of a resolutory condition, and
prescription, are governed elsewhere in this Code.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
22 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
23 | OUTLINE IN OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS || © J.TARROZA0809UST |