Fat Loss Facts, Tips & Tricks

Fat Loss Facts, Tips & Tricks: 2
Copyright Will Brink & Internet Publications. You are welcome to pass on this special report to others. You
may not, however, edit it, extract content from it or offer it for sale in any way.
Biography:Will Brink
Introduction
Brinks Unified Theory of Nutrition
The K.I.S.S. System for Success
Weight Loss Tips No One Uses
The Whey to Weight Loss
References
Fat Loss Revealed
Brinks Bodybuilding Revealed
Table of Contents
3 Fat Loss Facts, Tips & Tricks:
W
ill Brink is a columnist, contributing consultant, and writer
for numerous health/tness, medical, and bodybuilding pub-
lications. His articles on nutrition, supplements, weight loss,
exercise and medicine can be found in magazines and jour-
nals such as Lets Live, Muscle Media 2000,
MuscleMag International, Life Extension,
Muscle & Fitness, Inside Karate, Exercise
for Men Only, Oxygen, Te Townsend Let-
ter For Doctors, as well as many others.
Will Brink is the author of the book Prim-
ing Te Anabolic Environment: A practical
and Scientic Guide to the Art and Science
of Building Muscle, as well as various chap-
ters in sports nutritionrelated textbooks
and the ebooks Fat Loss Revealed and
Brinks Bodybuilding Revealed.
Will graduated from Harvard University
with a concentration in the natural sciences, and is a consultant to supple-
ment companies.
He has served as an NPC judge and as a Ms. Fitness USA judge. A well
known trainer, Will has helped many top level bodybuilders through all
facets of precontest and oseason training. He has also worked with ath-
letes ranging from professional golfers, tness contestants, and police and
military personnel.
His articles and interviews can be found on dozens of websites and at his
own piece of cyberspace at www.brinkzone.com.
Will has coauthored several studies published in peer-reviewed, academic
journals on sports nutrition and health.
Biography: Will Brink
His monthly column on supplements, Te Intake Update, is one of the
most popular features in MuscleMag International.
Will has lectured at trade associations and universities around the United
States and has appeared on numerous radio and television programs to ex-
amine issues of health and tness.
He can be contacted at:
PO Box 812430
Wellesley MA
02482
See Wills Brinkzone website:
Check out Fat Loss Revealed:
Check out Brinks Bodybuilding Revealed:
Biography: Will Brink
The Brinkzone
Fat Loss Revealed
Bodybuilding Revealed
T
his short ebook is broken up into four ma-
jor sections that gradually take the reader
from the largest perspective on nutrition
down to the very specic. Te rst section
takes two seemingly disparate viewpoints on nu-
trition and unies them into a single theory peo-
ple can use to make decisions regarding their
approach to weight loss. Tis unied theory
is the basis for my approach to nutrition, and
should give people a solid understanding of the
type of information they can expect from my
ebooks and articles.
Section Two is an overview of how people fail to achieve their tness/health
related goals by overthinking and getting too wrapped up in the details. Tis
is what I refer to as paralysis by analysis. People often take overly compli-
cated approaches to their tness/health/fat loss related goals, get confused,
get frustrated, throw their hands up in disgust, and give up. Te K.I.S.S.
philosophy will help to clear the confusion, and allow you to move forward
with your health and tness goals.
Te third section is a look at some simple though rarely used and un-
der appreciated tips to assist your weight loss eorts. Its intended to
be humorous with tongue rmly in cheek but added to a decent
diet and exercise plan, can be helpful. And we all know that any amount
of help however small can be the line be-
tween success and failure when were trying to
lose some fat.
Te fourth and nal section is a scienceorient-
ed look at the eects of whey protein on weight
loss. Whey protein is almost ubiquitous in the
diets of health conscious people, athletes of all
Introduction
kinds, and dieters. Whey has all manner of potential health benets, from
improving immunity, possibly preventing certain forms of cancer, to reduc-
ing the likelihood of overtraining in athletes in addition to the fact its an
exceptionally high quality protein. But can it be used as a legitimate weight
loss aid? Are there studies to support it for that use? Te answer appears to
be yes in both cases, and we explore the studies that exist in that section.
Introduction
W
hen people hear the term Unied Teory, sometimes called
the Grand Unied Teory, or even Teory of Everything,
they probably think in terms of physics. Regardless of the topic,
a unied theory often seeks to explain seemingly incompat-
ible aspects of various theories. For example, a unied theory in physics
attempts to create a single theory capable of
dening the interrelationships among nuclear,
electromagnetic, and gravitational forces. Te
result would be a single comprehensive set of
equations, or as theoretical physicist Michio
Katu, puts it:
...an equation an inch long that would allow us to read the mind of God.
Tats how important unied theories can be. However, unied theories
dont have to deal with such heady topics as physics or the nature of the
universe itself, but can be applied to far more mundane topics, in this case
nutrition.
In this article, I attempt to unify seemingly incompatible or opposing views
regarding nutrition , namely what is probably the longest running debate
in the nutritional sciences calories vs. macronutrients.
One school, which I call the old school of nutrition, maintains weight loss
or weight gain is all about calories, and a calorie is a calorie, no matter the
source (i.e., carbs, fats, or proteins). Tey base
their position on various lines of evidence to
come to that conclusion.
Te other school, which I call the new school
of thought on the issue, states that gaining or
losing weight is really about where the calo-
ries come from (i.e., carbs, fats, and proteins),
and that dictates weight loss or weight gain. In other words, they feel the
calorie is a calorie mantra of the old school is wrong. Tey too come to
this conclusion using various lines of evidence.
Tis has been an ongoing debate between people in the eld of nutrition,
biology, physiology, and many other disciplines for decades. Te result has
been conicting advice and a great deal of confusion for the general public,
not to mention many medical professionals and other groups.
Before I go any further, there are two key points that are essential to under-
stand about any unied theory:
A good unied theory is simple, concise, and understandable even to lay
people. However, underneath, or behind that theory, is often a great deal
of information that can take up many volumes of books. So it would
take a large book, if not several, for me to outline all the information I
have used to come to these conclusions which is far beyond the scope
of this article.
A unied theory is often proposed by some theorist before it can even
be proven or fully supported by physical evidence. Over time, dierent
lines of evidence, whether they be mathematical, physical, etc., support
the theory and thus validate that theory as cor-
rect or else continued lines of evidence show
the theory needs to be revised, or is simply in-
correct. I feel there is now more than enough
evidence at this point for a unied theory of
nutrition and future lines of evidence will con-
tinue (with some possible revisions) to solidify
the theory as fact.

A calorie is a calorie
In the old school of nutrition, which includes most mainstream nutrition-
ists, a calorie is a calorie when it comes to gaining or losing weight. Weight
loss or weight gain is strictly a matter of calories in, calories out. Trans-
lated, if you burn more calories than you take in, you will lose weight,
regardless of the calorie source, and if you eat more calories than you burn
o each day, you will gain weight.
Tis long held and accepted view of
nutrition is based on the fact that pro-
tein and carbs contain approx 4 calo-
ries per gram and fat approximately
9 calories per gram and the source of
those calories matters not. Tey base
this on the many studies that nd if
one reduces calories by X number each day, weight loss is the result; whereas
weight gain will occur if you add X number of calories above what you use
each day.
However, the calories in/calories out mantra fails to take into account
modern research that nds fats, carbs, and proteins have very dierent ef-
fects on the metabolism via countless pathways, such as their eects on hor-
mones (e.g., insulin, leptin, glucagon, etc), eects on hunger and appetite,
thermic eects (heat production), eects on uncoupling proteins (UCPs),
and 1000 other eects that could be mentioned.
Tis school of thought ignores the evermount-
ing volume of studies that have found diets
with dierent macronutrient ratios with iden-
tical calorie intakes have dierent eects on
body composition, cholesterol levels, oxida-
tive stress, etc. Even worse, the old school fails to take into account the
fact that dierent sources of a macronutrient can have dierent eects on
metabolism.
Translated, not only is the mantra a calorie is a
calorie proven to be false, but all fats are cre-
ated equal, and a protein is protein are also
incorrect. For example, we now know dierent
fats (e.g. sh oils vs. saturated fats) have vastly
dierent eects on metabolism and health in general; we now know dif-
ferent carbohydrates have their own eects (e.g. high GI vs. low GI), and
that dierent proteins can also have unique eects.
The calories dont matter school of thought
Tis school of thought will typically tell you that if you eat large amounts
of particular macronutrients in their magic ratios, calories dont matter. For
example, followers of ketogenicstyle diets that consist of high fat intakes
and very low carbohydrate intakes (i.e., Atkins, etc.) often maintain calories
dont matter in such a diet. Others maintain if you eat very high protein
intakes with very low fat and carbohydrate intakes, calories dont matter.
Like the old school, this new school fails to take into account the ef-
fects such diets have on various
pathways and ignore the simple
realities of human physiology, not
to mention the laws of thermody-
namics!
In reality, although its clear dif-
ferent macronutrients in dierent
amounts and ratios have dierent
eects on weight loss, fat loss, and other metabolic eects, calories do mat-
ter. Tey always have and they always will. Te data, and real world experi-
ence of millions of dieters, is quite clear on that reality.
Te truth behind such diets is that they are often quite good at suppress-
ing appetite and thus the person simply ends up eating fewer calories and
losing weight. Also, the weight loss from such diets is often from water vs.
fat, at least in the rst few weeks. Tats not to say people cant experience
meaningful weight loss with some of these diets, but the eect comes from
a reduction in calories vs. any magical eects often claimed by proponents
of such diets.
Weight loss vs. fat loss!
Tis is where we get into the crux of the true debate and why the two schools
of thought are not actually as far apart from one another as they appear to
the untrained eye. What has become abun-
dantly clear from the studies performed
and real world evidence, is that to lose
weight we need to use more calories than
we take in (via reducing calorie intake and/
or increasing exercise)...but we also know
dierent diets have dierent eects on the
metabolism, appetite, body composition,
and other physiological variables...
Tus, this reality has led me to Brinks Unied Teory of Nutrition which
states:
Total calories dictate how much weight a person gains or loses; macronu-
trient ratios dictate what a person gains or loses
Tis seemingly simple statement allows people to understand the dier-
ences between the two schools of thought. For example, studies often nd
that two groups of people on the same calorie intakes but very dierent
ratios of carbs, fats, and proteins will lose dierent amounts of body fat
and or lean body mass (i.e., muscle, bone, etc.).
Some studies nd, for example, that people on higher protein/lower carb
diets lose approximately the same amount of weight as another group on a
higher carb/lower protein diet, but the group on the higher protein diet lost
more actual fat and less lean body mass (muscle). Or, some studies using the
same calorie intakes but dierent macronutrient ratios often nd the higher
protein dieters may lose less actual weight than higher carb/lower protein
dieters, but the actual fat loss is higher in the higher protein/low carb diets.
Tis eect has also been seen in some studies that compared high fat/low
carb vs. high carb/low fat diets. Te eect is usually amplied if exercise is
involved, as one might expect.
Of course these eects are not found universally in
all studies that examine the issue, but the bulk of
the data is clear: diets containing dierent macro-
nutrient ratios do have dierent eects on human
physiology even when calorie intakes are identi-
cal.
111
As the authors of one recent study that looked at
the issue concluded:
Diets with identical energy contents can have dierent eects on leptin
concentrations, energy expenditure, voluntary food intake, and nitrogen
balance, suggesting that the physiologic adaptations to energy restriction
can be modied by dietary composition.
12
Te point being, there are many studies conrming that the actual ratio of
carbs, fats, and proteins in a given diet can aect what is actually lost (i.e.,
fat, muscle, bone, and water) and that total calories have the greatest eect
on how much total weight is lost. Are you starting to see how my unied
theory of nutrition combines the calorie is a calorie school with the calo-
ries dont matter school to help people make decisions about nutrition?
Knowing this, it becomes much easier for people to understand the seem-
ingly conicting diet and nutrition advice out there (of course this does
not account for the downright unscientic and dangerous nutrition ad-
vice people are subjected to via bad books, TV, the net, and wellmeaning
friends, but thats another article altogether).
Keeping the Unied Teory of Nutrition in mind, the above information
leads us to some important and potentially useful conclusions:
An optimal diet designed to make a person lose fat and retain as much
LBM as possible is not the same as a diet
designed for simple weight loss.

A nutrition program designed to create
fat loss is not simply a reduced calorie
version of a nutrition program designed
to gain weight, and visa versa.

Diets need to be designed with fat loss,
NOT just weight loss, as the goal, but
total calories cant be ignored.

Tis is why the diets I design for people or
write about for gaining or losing weight
are not simply higher or lower calorie versions of the same diet. In short: diet
plans I design for gaining LBM start with total calories and build macronu-
trient ratios into the number of calories required. However, diets designed
for fat loss (vs. weight loss!) start with the correct macronutrient ratios that
depend on variables such as amount of LBM (lean body mass) the person

carries vs. body fat percentage, activity levels, etc. Total calories are based
on the proper macronutrient ratios to achieve fat loss with a minimum loss
of LBM. Te actual ratio of macronutrients can be quite dierent for both
diets and even for individuals.

Diets that give the same macronutrient ratio to all people (e.g., 40/30/30,
or 70/30/10, etc.) regardless of total calories, goals, activity levels, etc.,
will always be less than optimal. Optimal macronutrient ratios can change
with total calories and other variables.

Perhaps most importantly, the unied theory explains why the focus on
weight loss vs. fat loss by the vast majority of people, including most
medical professionals and the media, will
always fail in the long run to deliver the
results people want.

Finally, the Universal Teory makes it clear
that the optimal diet for losing fat or gain-
ing muscle, or whatever the goal, must
account not only for total calories, but also macronutrient ratios that
optimize metabolic eects and answer the questions: what eects will
this diet have on appetite? What eects will this diet have on metabolic
rate? What eects will this diet have on my lean body mass? What ef-
fects will this diet have on the hormones that may improve or impede
my goals? What eects will this diet have on (ll in the blank)?
Simply asking, how much weight will
I lose? is the wrong question which
will lead to the wrong answer. To get
the optimal eects from your next diet,
whether looking to gain weight or lose
it, you must ask the right questions to
get meaningful answers.

Asking the right questions will also help you avoid
the pitfalls of unscientic, poorly thought out di-
ets which make promises they cant keep and go
against what we know about human physiology
and the very laws of physics!
People that want to know my thoughts on the
correct way to lose fat should read my ebook Fat
Loss Revealed.
Tere are, of course, many additional questions that can be asked and points
that can be raised as it applies to the above, but those are some of the key
issues that come to mind. Bottom line here is, if the diet you are following
to either gain or lose weight does not address those issues and or questions,
then you can count on being among the millions of disappointed people
who dont receive the optimal results they had hoped for and have made yet
another nutrition guru laugh all the way to the bank at your expense.
Any diet that claims calories dont matter, forget it. Any diet that tells you
they have a magic ratio of foods, ignore it. Any diet that tells you any one
food source is evil, its a scam. Any diet that tells you it will work for all
people all the time no matter the circumstances, throw it out or give it to
someone you dont like!

Fat Loss Revealed
I
n this section of the report, we attempt to add sim-
plicity to what many think of as a complicated top-
ic. Te acronym Keep it simple stupid or KISS,
has been used for decades by the military, business
schools, medical schools, and in countless other areas where
unneeded complexity should be avoided at all costs. In the mili-
tary, adding complexity where its unnecessary to complete a mission will
get people killed. Adding complexity to a business venture where it is not
required will often get you red or see your company go down in ames.
Adding complexity, or looking for complex answers to simple problems in
medical settings can cause a loss of life or unneeded suering. I am sure
my readers have also experienced situations in which complexity added to
situations that didnt require it, led to disastrous results.
One area where most people fail to follow the KISS system is in their ap-
proach to tness, nutrition, or supplements. In fact I nd people seem to
gravitate toward adding complexity to their approach when it comes to
building muscle or losing fat. Not coincidentally, its the people who take
the most complex approaches to their nutrition, supplements, and train-
ing who are always the most confused and least
successful. Tey focus on and subsequently
worry about minutiae that prevent them
from seeing the big picture and making the
type of progress they desire. It often leads
to what is referred to as paralysis by analy-
sis. Te vast majority of people would have
better results, not to mention less stress, if
they simplied their approach to losing fat
or gaining muscle. Its not rocket science,
brain surgery, or even rocket surgery!
Yes, there are times when complex approach-
es need to be used to get advanced athletes,
Follow the K.I.S.S. Approach for Success
such as precontest bodybuilders and Olympic track athletes, prepared for
an event. Tese people make up, at most, 0.1% of the population. Te rest
of the world needs to worry less and act more.
Why is complexity a bad thing? The issue is variables.
Adding too many variables makes things more dicult, especially when
trying to gure out why something is working or why its not. Variables
are an essential part of science. We dont need to go into great depth on
this topic, so dont worry. I do, however, want people to appreciate how
variables aect the outcome of their successes or failures in bodybuilding
or tness related endeavors.
So what is a variable? According to one of my textbooks:
Scientists use an experiment to search for
cause and eect relationships in nature.
In other words, they design an experi-
ment so that changes to one item cause
something else to vary in a predictable
way. Tese changing quantities are called
variables
Tere are dierent types of variables (e.g.,
confounding, independent, dependent,
controlled, etc.) but we are not going to worry about that right now. So
how does this all apply to the KISS approach? Te more complicated you
make your approach to your goals of gaining muscle or losing fat, the more
variables you have to control for. Tat is, for every new bit of complexity
you add, you have to be able to account for it in terms of the results, or lack
thereof, you experience.
Confused? Heres a simple example:
Last week you changed your diet, added in
three new supplements, and changed your
routine, then three weeks later you notice
you have made no improvements (i.e. you
didnt lose any fat, or you didnt gain any
muscle, or whatever). Why? Its impossible
to know! You added too many variables
into the equation and now youre unsure what went wrong which means
you wont be able to make appropriate changes to correct it. Conversely,
lets say you did lose fat or gain muscle with the changes. Great, but do you
know which of the changes you made resulted the positive outcome you
experienced so you can reproduce it? No, no you dont.
So, Lesson #1 is: never change more than one or two variables at a time so
you can track what worked and what did not work from the changes
you made. Most people nd writing it down in a note book or online jour-
nal is the best way to keep track of their progress. When you write it down,
you can see the eects that changes in your diet, training, or supplementa-
tion have on your body composition, strength, etc.
KISS and those ugly variables
On my forums, its not uncommon for someone to post a question like
I added supplement X, Y, and Z to my supplement intake, added an ex-
tra day per week in the gym,
and reduced my calories by
X. Why am I not seeing prog-
ress? My response is too
many unknown variables to
answer that question, which
translates into how the hell
should I know?
Why do people make so many changes at once? I suspect its due to the I
want it now syndrome. Making permanent changes to your performance,
physique, and health takes patience, planning, and a willingness to take
things one step at a time and assess what is working and whats not work-
ing in the overall plan.
Clearly, the KISS approach fails to be eective as more variables are added
to a program. It also fails to be KISS. How can you keep it simple if it aint
simple to begin with?! Te more complicated the program, the more vari-
ables there are to keep track of which makes success far less likely. Tis
basic idea was appreciated and understood by historys greatest minds. For
example:
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.

Albert Einstein
What was the Father of Relativity
saying? Be it math, science, nutri-
tion, or life, Keep It Simple Stupid
wherever possible, but dont simplify
it to the point where its no longer
eective or true. In my own writ-
ings, be it articles or books/ebooks,
I make every attempt to keep the in-
formation and message as simple as
possible. However, I often see popular books and diets that are in fact too
simple. Tey dont want to confuse people, so they simplify things to the
point that their advice is no longer correct and has little value to the reader
thus, Einsteins warning. Oversimplied statements like carbs are bad or
fat is bad or do weight lifting for big muscles and aerobics to burn fat are
among the gems we all see. Problem is, those statements are dead wrong!
A line between simple and too simple must be drawn.
OK, back to the KISS approach
Its not possible for me to go through every example of how to take a KISS
approach to your training, nutrition, or supplement intake, but I will at-
tempt a general discussion of each.
KISS and training
One of the most common mistakes I see
in this area is what I like to call the I
have tried everything and nothing works
syndrome. My response is always: Have
you tried sticking to one program long
enough for it to actually have any eect?
Te answer is usually a guilty sheepish
facial expression. Let me be honest with
you: even an average uncomplicated program you are consistent with is far
more eective than any hightech, superadvanced program you fail to be
consistent with. One simple program you follow consistently for a year is
always better than the ve high tech programs you tried in 6 months where
none of them were followed long enough to have a positive outcome. Sim-
ple programs such as: weight training Monday, Wed, Fri, and aerobics, Tue,
Turs, and Sat, with Sunday o while varying your exercises tend to
work well for the majority of people.
Are there better programs out there? Of course, but the vast majority of
people follow routines that are overly complicated, take too long, and are
simply unneeded.
I also see a dependence on less productive movements in the gym over more
productive choices. I see people doing reverse Romanian lunges while the
squat rack gathers dust in the corner. Was that you I saw the other day?
KISS and supplements
You dont need them. Bet you never thought you would read that coming
from me did you?! Let me qualify that state-
ment: does a person need any supplements to
achieve the basic goal of either adding muscle or
losing fat? No, no they dont. Can supplements
help the process? Can supplements potentially
speed up the process? Can supplements poten-
tially oset some of the negatives? Can supple-
ments help optimize the eects of exercise and
diet? Te answer is yes in all cases. Te problem,
however, is that I see far too many people under
the impression that the next whiz bang cut-
ting edge supplement is going to make some
huge dierence to their appearance while their
diet and workout are put on the back burner or set low on the priority list.
Tey are constantly looking for that one supplement thats going to make
all the dierence while they ignore their nutrition and training! I see it all
the time and frankly, its frustrating.
Remember, KISS. Focus on your training and your nutrition then worry
about supplements. Start o with the basics, like a good multivitamin, a
source of essential fatty acids (EFAs) and a good protein powder post work-
out, then add additional supplements over time depending on your goals,
such as creatine when trying to add muscle, or ephedrine and caeine when
focusing on fat loss, and so on. Te shotgun approach many people take
rarely works, wastes money, and adds complexity (remember our conversa-
tion on variables above) where it serves no useful purpose.
I love supplements. I take a dozen or more supplements every day of my
life. I have designed them for supplement companies, spoken about them at
various conferences, been involved in the published research of supplements,
and built my career on them, so I am not some antisupplement zealot by
any means. However, I do speak with people all the time who outline a
long list of supplements they are taking (many of which have been shown
to be totally worthless) while their diets stink and their training programs
are a joke. Dont be one of these people! Dont think for a second there is
any one supplement out there that will make or break your success. Realize
that supplements are exactly that; supplemental to a good diet and intel-
ligent exercise program.
KISS and nutrition
Finally, we make it to nutrition.
Nutrition is a potentially com-
plex topic, and just as impor-
tantly, its a highly emotional
topic for many. No place do I
nd such clear examples of peo-
ple adding complexity where
its not required. Again, there is a small segment of people that will benet
from and require advanced nutritional approaches, such as precon-
test bodybuilders, prerace track athletes, or even the average person seek-
ing to get to very low body fat levels. Does the average person who needs
to get into better shape and lose perhaps 2030 lbs. (or more) need to fol-
low advanced nutrition concepts? Of course not! Can the average person
benet from techniques more advanced dieters (e.g., bodybuilders, tness
competitors, etc.) might employ, such as cyclic ketogenic diets, refeed days,
carb cycling, and other approaches? Of course! Do they require such strat-
egies to drop some fat and get into shape? No, no they dont. Tats why I
tend to oer well thought out, healthy, and easy to follow approaches to
nutrition in my ebooks and oer more advanced approaches to people
who want to take it to another level.
Remember one fact that has been conrmed by studies and the real world:
losing weight is not all that dicult and essentially any diet will work for
that purpose. Whats dicult is keeping the weight o permanently. If the
diet you chose to follow cant guarantee that, its worthless. Tat fact nar-
rows down your choices of diets that should be used considerably.
Simplicity + Consistency = Success
Te above is what I consider the basics of
the KISS approach to nutrition, supple-
ments, and training. You will have to ll
in some of the blanks as it applies to you
specically. If you are making steady pre-
dictable progress, great, stick to it. If you
are not making progress in your goals to
add muscle and or lose fat, however, then you may need to sit down and
seriously rethink your approach. Is there added complexity where you know
its not needed? Are you relying too heavily on supplements to achieve your
goals? Do you nd yourself doing exercises that are less eective than the
good old fashioned basics, like squats, deadlifts, and bench press? Do you
keep jumping on diets that work for some period of time, then when you
go back to your normal way of eating, the weight comes right back?
I cant answer those questions for you, but hopefully Ive made you think
which is half of the battle. You know what they say, you can lead a horse to
water but you cant make him think!
I
have a CheezIt problem. Youre not
listeningI really have a CheezIt
problem! I have never met a Cheez
It I didnt like.* Some people cant
resist chocolate or ice cream; for oth-
ers, its pizza or some other food or sweet.
While I enjoy all of those foods on occasion,
CheezIts are the food equivalent of crack co-
caine for me.
It takes all my willpower to pass up the aisle where
the CheezIts reside on the shelves at my local grocery store. My ever lov-
ing girl friend Kimberly rolls her eyes at me in sheer disgust when she sees
how weak I am to the power of these little crackers, which draw me in like
a cheese avored black hole. But you have given advice on nutrition to
millions of people Will, how could you of all people be so weak willed
about some little cheese avored cracker?! she says. I hang my head in
shame and avoid eye contact with her for the rest of the day.
Te point of this introduction is that we all have our weaknesses and we are
all humaneven me. I nd CheezIts to be cheeseavored morphine!
Tis small problem got me to thinking. If there is one thing I have learned
after all these years of doing nutritional research, writing countless articles
on the topic of nutrition, and working directly with people on their diets,
its this: its rarely one single thing a person does that sabotages their eorts
to lose fat and or gain muscle, but a bunch of little things that have an ac-
cumulated eect.
Tere are some amazingly simple behaviors and strategies we can all add
to our nutritional goals and workout plans that will have a positive eect.
Using my own addiction to CheezIts as the primary example, I am go-
ing to cover a few of these surprisingly simple, yet eective strategies. A few
The Simplest Weight Loss Tips No One Follows
issues to keep in mind:
Taken alone, these simple tactics will have very little eect. Used alone
without any other dietary changes and an exercise plan, these strategies
wont amount to much. However, as I mentioned, its often many minor
mistakes adding up to a lack of results for people. Taken in that context,
these are some simple mistakes that can be avoided, hopefully resulting
in an accumulated eect in a positive direction.
I didnt invent any of these tips. Tey are some of the oldest and simplest
tips you will ever read. I dont even know who rst came up with them,
and I bet most people have seen these strategies in other places, such as
various diet books, articles, or web sites. I do, however, think that they
may be so old and so simple that most people with the best of inten-
tions about their nutrition and exercise plans still dont follow these
simple concepts.
Tese tips are more about behavior changes and psychol-
ogy than nutritional science, study results, or research. I
have written many articles based on the latter topics, but
this is not one of those. People interested in a more hard
core scienceoriented article will probably enjoy the
next section of this ebook called Te Whey to Weight
Loss which looks at the studies with whey protein and its possible eects
on weight loss. In addition to that, if you are looking for more indepth,
scienceoriented information about nutrition, supplements, and fat loss or
gaining muscle, I suggest reading my ebooks on the topic and the many
free articles on the Brinkzone.
1.
2.
The Brinkzone
Tip #1: NEVER, ever go food shopping hungry
Tis is one of the most eective strat-
egies I know of to avoid unwanted
junk and various snacks from nd-
ing their way into your shopping
cart; which end up in your home,
which end up on your butt!
Make sure to eat something before
you go food shopping and you will
be able to resist the junk that often nds its way into your cart. If I go food
shopping without a good meal in my stomach, I often come home with a
family sized box of CheezIts and feel like sh*& for days after eating the
entire box!
Human hunger and appetite are regulated by a phenomenally complicated
set of overlapping feedback networks, involving a long list of hormones,
psychological factors, and others way beyond the scope of this section. Suf-
ce it to say, we often make snap decisions and impulse purchases with cer-
tain foods due to one or more of these feedback loops being activated by
an empty stomach while we shop.
Translated, your willpower to resist junk foods will be much greater if you
eat something healthy at least 2030 minutes before you go food shopping.
You can either plan your meal schedule so that one meal is eaten before you
go shopping, or have a snack (at least
2030 minutes before shopping) which
will have the desired eects.
A yogurt with some ax oil and walnuts
mixed in is a good choice, as is a halfcup
of cottage cheese and a handful of walnuts or some other nut. A protein
shake or MRP will suce, but solid food tends to be more satiating.
Tip #2: NEVER keep snack foods in the house
Tis tip is a logical extension of Tip #1. If it does not
make it into your cart at the food store, its not in your
house. However, many people use excuses like I have
snack foods for the kids or my spouse keeps a box
of Oreo cookies in the kitchen cupboard as reasons
they cant avoid the snacks that sneak into their diets
and sabotage their eorts.
Many of the foods we eat that we know we should
not be eating are eaten on an impulse. Impulse con-
trol goes a long way here, but few will deny that its
harder to resist that impulse if your favorite junk food is under your nose.
Tats human nature. When I have an impulse for some Cheezits, I wont
resist it well if its only a few steps to the kitchen vs. having to get in the
car to go get a box.
Te former I cant resist, the latter I can. Remember, an impulse is dened
as a sudden desire, urge, inclination. Tat means its shortlived and will
go away, given sucient time, so its a matter of not having foods in your
house that allow you to act on the impulse
while it lasts.
As for the excuse of the spouse, kids, etc.
Tat is more an issue between your kids
and/or your spouse. Should the kids be eat-
ing that stu anyway? No! I had a client tell
me one day I keep eating hot dogs cause I
keep them in the house for the kids. I said
so youre ok with feeding your kids foods you know to be unhealthy for you
and them? She stopped feeding her family hot dogs shortly after.
...Bottom line here is, those foods should be occasional treats for both kids
and adults, not staple foods that can be found in your kitchen. Its more an
issue of teaching the kids good dietary habits young so they dont end up
as overweight, unhealthy adults.
As for the spouse, I like to have some chips in the house, which I can resist
without a problem. Tat is, unlike the Cheezits, I can walk past the chips
without having to eat them all. I can regulate myself with them. However,
Kimberly cant. Chips are to her what Cheezits are to me, so I make it a
rule not to keep chips in the house.
Point being, your spouse needs to support your eorts by making some
small sacrices. If you were an alcoholic trying to avoid alcohol, you would
(or at least should!) expect your signicant other to not keep booze in the
house. If they wont support your eorts here, then relationship counseling
is in order or a long talk, and I cant help you there sorry!
Tip #3: Eat off of smaller plates
How much we eat is based on many variables. One of them is the visual
cues we get from looking at the food we are about to eat. We are extremely
visually oriented creatures and we often decide how large an object is by
comparing it to other objects. Tus, the amount of food we put on a plate
is compared to the size of the plate we put the food on. Some of you may
remember this little visual test from grade school...
Looking at the two horizontal lines below, which one is longer?
Answer: both lines are identical in length. As you can see, the bottom plate
looks longer than top plate, yet they are the same length. Its a visual il-
lusion that shows how our brains are set up to interpret certain visual cues.
It is my experience that people will put less food on their plate if they eat
from smaller plates, as a smaller plate full of food looks like much more to
eat than a large plate with the same amount of food on it.
I know for myself I tend to put 2
slices of pizza on a small plate and
three on a large plate! Now this is
only one minor cue we have to self
regulate how much food we eat, and
other feedback loops (i.e., hormonal,
psychological, etc.) can kick in and eas-
ily oset this strategy.
For example, you could simply come back for a second helping using the
smaller plates. However, its my hunch (and its only a hunch as research is
lacking here) that over the course of say a month, a person may end
up taking in fewer total calories using this strategy, as has been my (admit-
tedly anecdotal) experience with both myself and the many people I have
given advice to over the years.
Again, as already mentioned, taken alone, this strategy will probably have
no eects on your eorts to lose fat if there is not a specic diet and exercise
plan involved in the overall equation. It is, however, a simple, small change
that may enhance your results. It would be interesting to see a study on this.
While I expect that the direct eects would be subtle and fairly small, over
the course of a year, it may help.
Tip #4: Know Thy Self
Te lesson here is, we are all human and we all have our weaknesses. Te
trick is to know your weakness and develop strategies for coping with them.
How well do you know yourself? Tat is, do you know what cues/triggers
tend to set you o? Have you examined that issue for yourself? Its essential
to recognize the cues that sabotage your eorts. We all have them. Find
yours and take steps to avoid them where possible.
For example, try making a list outlining
the things you know tend to set you o
and how you react to them, then add a
column for how you could deal with it.
For example, you might write talking to
my crazy mother makes me anxious and
I eat things I shouldnt immediately after
the phone conversation. Tis would be
followed by suggestions of how to change
it. Some examples are: always eat a meal
right before talking to Mom; only take
calls from Mom when I am ready and able to deal with her; go for a walk
immediately after talking to Mom to destress and give me time to get over
my impulse to eat junk; and so on.
Develop coping strategies to your known triggers. I know, for example,
going food shopping on an empty stomach means I will most probably
end up with a large box of Cheezits in my house. I have also found if I
go shopping irritated over something, I will buy more foods I dont need,
as food is one of many ways we selfmedicate looking for some comfort.
Hence the term comfort foods which are commonly chocolate, ice cream,
and so on.
Te bottom line:
Learn what your hot buttons are that
lead to a negative behavior.
Learn to identify when its happening.

Develop strategies for coping with it.
How do you go about doing that? As entire books have been written on
that topic, my advice will fall short here. Tat journey is also highly indi-
vidual. For some, its working with a therapist or behavioral specialist; for
some, its reading a few good selfhelp type books; and for some, its activi-
ties such as meditation, joining support groups, and similar activities. Its
also a lifelong journey.
Conclusion
Te purpose of this section is actually to remind people of what is stated in
the introduction: most people fail in their fat loss/diet goals not because
of a single mistake they are making (with exceptions) but to many small
mistakes that have an accumulated eect that sabotages their eorts. If the
above tips help, all the better.
Some people are amazed how many extra calories slip into their diet from
snack foods that they are not accounting for. Ninetynine out of a hundred
times, the person that says I have tried everything and nothing works is
actually saying I didnt stay on any one plan long enough for it to have an
eect, and sabotaged it with small, unaccountedfor negative habits and
behaviors. Now, if I can just get the funding for that adult Cheezit re-
hab center I want to have built.

I
n this section we get much more scientic. Most readers of this ebook
have probably heard of whey protein. However, very few of them know
all that much about it, other than its a high quality protein that athletes
and dieters alike use to supplement their diets. Whey protein provides far
more than that, however it also oers immuneboosting and anticancer
benets. Additional research also suggests possible medical uses for whey
that are quite unexpected and dierent from wheys traditional role as an
immune booster and anticancer functional food. For example, whey may
be able to reduce stress and lower cortisol, increase brain serotonin levels,
improve liver function in those suering from certain forms of hepatitis,
and reduce blood pressure. Tere are even more amazing recent discover-
ies, such as wheys possible eects on weight loss, which is the focus of this
section.
What is whey?
When we talk about whey we are actually referring to a complex milkbased
ingredient made up of protein, lactose, fat and minerals. Protein is the
bestknown component of whey and is made up of many smaller protein
subfractions such as: betalactoglobulin, al-
phalactalbumin, immunoglobulins (IgGs),
glycomacropeptides, bovine serum albumin
(BSA) and minor peptides such as lactoper-
oxidases, lysozyme and lactoferrin.
Each of the subfractions found in whey pro-
tein has its own unique biological properties.
Modern ltering technology has improved
dramatically in the past decade, allowing
companies to separate some of the highly
bioactive peptides such as lactoferrin and
lactoperoxidase from whey.
The Whey to Weight Loss!
Some of these subfractions are only found in very
minute amounts in cows milk, often less than one
percent (e.g., lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, etc.)
Te medicinal properties of whey have been known
for centuries. For example, an expression from Flor-
ence, Italy, circa 1650, was:

Chi vuol viver sano e lesto beve scotta e cena presto
which translates into English as: If you want to live a healthy and active
life, drink whey and dine early.
Another expression from Italy regarding the benets of whey (circa 1777)
was
Allevato con la scotta il dottore e in bancarotta.
Which translates into English If everyone were raised on whey, doctors
would be bankrupt.
Is whey a weight loss functional food?
Although there was a smattering of studies suggesting
whey had certain properties that might assist with
weight loss, a number of recent studies oer further
support for whey proteins potential as a weight loss
supplement. Whats most interesting at least to
nerds like me is that whey doesnt appear to act
by a single mechanism, but several. Tis article will
briey explore a few possible pathways by which
whey may assist the dieter.

Im hungry!
Human hunger and appetite are regulated by a phenomenally complicated
set of overlapping feedback networks, involving a long list of hormones,
psychological factors as well as physiological factors, all of which are still
being elucidated. Its a very intensive area of research right now, with vari-
ous pharmaceutical companies looking for that magic bullet weight loss
breakthrough they can bring to market.
One hormone getting attention by research-
ers looking for possible solutions to obesity is
cholecystokinin (CCK). Several decades ago,
researchers found CCK largely responsible for
the feeling of fullness or satiety experienced
after a meal and partially controls appetite, at
least in the short term.
Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a small peptide with multiple functions in both
the central nervous system and the periphery (via CCKB and CCKA
receptors respectively). Along with other hormones, such as pancreatic
glucagon, bombesin, glucagonlike peptide1, amide (GLP1), oxynto-
modulin, peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP), CCK is re-
leased by ingested food from the gastrointestinal tract and mediates satiety
after meals.
Such a list would not be complete without at least making mention of what
many researchers consider the master hormones in this milieu, which are
insulin and leptin. If thats not confusing enough, release of these hormones
depends on the concentration and composition of the nutrients ingested.
Tis means that the type of nutrients (i.e., fat, protein, and carbohydrates)
eaten, the amount of each eaten, and composition of the meal, all aect
which hormones are released and in what amountsNeedless to say, its a
topic that gets real complicated, real fast and the exact roles of all the vari-
ables are far from fully understood at this time, though huge strides have
been made recently.
Wheys effects on food intake
Tis (nally!) brings us to whey protein.
Whey protein may have some unique ef-
fects on food intake via its eects on CCK
and other pathways. Many studies have
shown that protein is the most satiating
macronutrient. However, it also appears
all proteins may not be created equal in
this respect.
For example, two studies using human volunteers compared whey vs. casein
(another milkbased protein) on appetite, CCK, and other hormones.
1
Te rst study found that energy intake from a buet meal was signicantly
less 90 minutes after a liquid meal containing whey, compared to a meal
containing an equivalent amount of casein. In the second study, the same
whey preload led to a plasma CCK increase of 60% (in addition to large
increases in glucagonlike peptide [GLP]1 and glucosedependent insu-
linotropic polypeptide) compared with the casein.
Translated, taking whey before people were allowed to eat all they wanted
(ad libitum) at a buet caused a decrease in the amount of calories they ate
as well as substantial increases in CCK compared to casein. Subjectively, it
was found there was greater satiety following the whey meal also.
Te researchers concluded:
Tese results implicate postabsorptive increases in plasma amino acids to-
gether with both CCK and GLP1 as potential mediators of the increased
satiety response to whey and emphasize the importance of considering the
impact of protein type on the appetite response to a mixed meal.
Several animal studies also nd whey appears to
have a more pronounced eect on CCK and/or
satiety than other protein sources.
It should be noted, however, that not all studies
have found this eect of whey vs. other protein
sources on food intake.
2
It should also be noted that, although studies
nd protein to be the most satiating of the mac-
ronutrients, certain protein sources (e.g. egg whites) may actually increase
appetite,
3
so protein sources appear worth considering when looking to
maximize weight loss and suppress appetite.
How whey protein achieves this eect is not fully understood, but research
suggests its due to wheys high glycomacropeptide and alphalactalbumin
content, its high solubility compared to other proteins, and perhaps its high
percentage of branched chain amino acids (BCAAs).
Wheys effects on insulin sensitivity and fat burning
So we have some studies suggesting whey may have some unique eects on
hormones involved in satiety and/or may reduce energy (calorie) intake in
subsequent meals, but do we have studies showing direct eects of whey vs.
other proteins on weight loss? In animals at least, whey looks like a prom-
ising supplement for weight loss.
Although higher protein diets have been found to improve insulin sensi-
tivity, and may be superior for weight loss (with some debate!) than higher
carbohydrate, lower protein diets, its unclear if all proteins have the same
eects.
One study compared whey to a meatbased diet in rats and found whey
reduced body weight and tissue lipid levels and increased insulin sensitivity
compared to red meat.
4
Rats were fed a high fat diet for nine weeks, then
switched to a diet containing either whey or kan-
garoo meat for an additional six weeks. As has
generally been found in other studies, the move
to a high protein diet reduced energy intake (due
to the known satiating eects of protein compared
to carbs or fat), as well as reductions in visceral
and subcutaneous body fat.
However, in the rats getting the whey, there was a 40% reduction in plasma
insulin concentrations and increased insulin sensitivity compared to the red
meat. Not surprisingly, the researchers concluded
Tese ndings support the conclusions that a highprotein diet reduces en-
ergy intake and adiposity and that whey protein is more eective than red
meat in reducing body weight gain and increasing insulin sensitivity.
Other studies suggest taking whey before a workout is superior for pre-
serving/gaining lean body mass (LBM) and maintaining fat burning (beta
oxidation) during exercise over other foods taken prior to a workout. One
study called A preexercise lactalbuminenriched whey protein meal pre-
serves lipid oxidation and decreases adiposity in rats came to some very
interesting conclusions.
One thing we have known a long time is the composition of the preexercise
meal will aect substrate utilization during exercise and thus, might aect
longterm changes in body weight and composition. In other words, what
you eat before you workout can dictate what you use for energy (i.e. carbs,
fats, and or proteins), which alters what you burn (oxidize) for energy.
Te researchers took groups of rats and made the poor buggers exercise two
hours daily for over ve weeks (talk about overtraining!), either in the fasted
state or one hour after they ingested a meal enriched with a simple sugar
(glucose), whole milk protein or whey protein.
Te results were quite telling. Compared with fasting (no food), the glucose
meal increased glucose oxidation and decreased lipid oxidation during and
after exercise. Translated, they burned sugar over body fat for their energy
source. In contrast, the whole milk protein and whey meals preserved lip-
id oxidation and increased protein oxidation. Translated, fat burning was
maintained and they also used protein as
a fuel source.
Not surprisingly, the whey meal increased
protein oxidation more than the whole
milk protein meal, most likely due to the
fact that whey is considered a fast pro-
tein that is absorbed rapidly due to its high
solubility.
As one would expect, by the end of the
ve weeks, body weight was greater in the
glucose, whole milk protein and wheyfed rats than in the fasted ones. No
shock there. Here is where it gets interesting: in the group getting the glu-
cose or the whole milk protein, the increase in weight was from body fat,
but in the wheyfed group, the increase in weight was from an increase in
muscle mass and a decrease in body fat!
Only the rats getting the whey before their workout increased muscle mass
and decreased their body fat. Te researchers theorized this was due to wheys
ability to rapidly deliver amino acids during exercise.
5
Is this the next big
nd in sports nutrition or for those simply looking to preserve muscle
mass loss due to aging?
Hard to say at this time, since it was done in rats, but if it turns out to be
true in humans (and there is no reason people cant try it now) it would
indeed be a breakthrough in the quest to add muscle and lose fat.
Effects on serotonin, blood sugar regulation, and more!
Although the above would probably be the major mechanisms by which
whey protein could help the dieter, there are several secondary eects of
whey that may assist in weight loss. For example, whey proteins eects on
serotonin levels. Serotonin is probably the most studied neurotransmitter
since it has been found to be involved in a wide range of psychological and
biological functions. Serotonin ( also called 5hydroxytryptamine or 5HT)
is involved with mood, anxiety, and appetite.
Elevated levels of serotonin can cause relaxation and reduced anxiety. Low
serotonin levels are associated with low mood, increased anxiety (hence the
current popularity of the SSRI drugs such as Prozac and others), and poor
appetite control. Tis is an extremely abbreviated description of all the
functions serotonin performs in the human body many
of which have yet to be fully elucidated but a full ex-
planation is beyond the scope of this article.
Needless to say, increased brain serotonin levels are
associated with an improved ability of people to
cope with stress, whereas a decline in serotonin
activity is associated with depression and anxiety.
Elevated levels of serotonin in the body often
result in the relief of depression, as well as substantial reduction in pain
sensitivity, anxiety and stress. It has also been theorized that a diet induced
increase in tryptophan will increase brain serotonin levels, while a diet de-
signed for weight loss (e.g., a diet that reduces calories) may lead to a re-
duction of brain serotonin levels due to reduced substrate for production
and a reduction in carbohydrates.
Many people who reduce their calorie in-
takes to lose weight nd they are often ill
tempered and more anxious. Reductions in
serotonin may be partially to blame here.
One recent study examined whether alpha
lactalbumin a major subfraction found
in whey which has an especially high tryp-
tophan content would increase plasma
tryptophan levels as well as reduce depres-
sion and cortisol concentrations in subjects
considered to be vulnerable to stress.
Te researchers examined twentynine highly stressvulnerable subjects
and 29 relatively stressinvulnerable subjects using a doubleblind, pla-
cebocontrolled study design. Te study participants were exposed to ex-
perimental stress after eating a diet enriched with either alphalactalbumin
(found in whey) or sodium caseinate, another milkbased protein. Te re-
searchers looked at:
Dietinduced changes in the plasma tryptophan and its ratio to other
large neutral amino acids.
Prolactin levels.
Changes in mood and pulse rate.

Cortisol levels (which were assessed before and after the stressor).
Amazingly, the ratio of plasma tryptophan to the other amino acids tested
was 48% higher after the alphalactalbumin diet than after the casein diet!
Tis was accompanied by a decrease in cortisol levels and higher prolactin
concentration. Perhaps most important and relevant to the average person
reading this article, they found reduced depressive feelings when test sub-
jects were put under stress.
Tey concluded that:
Consumption of a dietary protein enriched in tryptophan increased the
plasma TrpLNAA ratio and, in stressvulnerable subjects, improved cop-
ing ability, probably through alterations in brain serotonin.
Tis eect was not seen in the sodium caseinate group.
6
If other studies
can conrm these ndings, whey may turn out to be yet another safe and
eective supplement in the battle against depression and stress, as well as
reduced serotonin levels due to dieting.
Although there is a long list of hormones involved in appetite regulation,
some of which have been mentioned above, serotonin appears to be a key
player in the game. In general, experiments nd increased serotonin avail-
ability or activity = reduced food consumption and decreased serotonin =
increased food consumption. If whey protein can selectively increase se-
rotonin levels above that of other proteins, it could be very helpful to the
dieter.
Other possible advantages whey may confer to the
dieter is improved blood sugar regulation
7
which
is yet another key area in controlling appetite and
metabolism.

Finally, calcium from dairy products has been
found to be associated with a reduction in
bodyweight and fat mass. Calcium is thought
to inuence energy metabolism as intracel-
lular calcium regulates fat cell (adipocyte)
lipid metabolism as well as triglyceride stor-
age. Its been demonstrated in several stud-
ies the superiority of dairy versus nondairy
sources of calcium for improving body composition, and the whey fraction
of dairy may be the key.
Te mechanism responsible for increased fat loss found with dairybased
calcium versus nondairy calcium is not fully understood, but researchers
looking at the issue theorized that:
dairy sources of calcium markedly attenuate weight and fat gain and
accelerate fat loss to a greater degree than do supplemental sources of cal-
cium. Tis augmented eect of dairy products relative to supplemental
calcium is likely due to additional bioactive compounds, including the
angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitors and the rich concentration of
branchedchain amino acids in whey, which act synergistically with cal-
cium to attenuate adiposity.
It appears components in whey some of which have been mentioned
above are thought to act synergistically with calcium to improve body
composition.
8
Conclusion
Taken in isolation, none of these studies are so compelling that people should
view whey protein as some form of weight loss nirvana. However, taken as
a total picture, the bulk of the research seems to conclude that whey may,
in fact, have some unique eects on weight loss and could be of great use
to the dieter. More studies are clearly needed however.
So what is the practical application of all this information and how does
the dieter put it to good use? Since the appetitesuppressing eects of whey
appear to last approximately 23 hours, it would seem best to stagger the
intake throughout the day. For example, breakfast might be 12 scoops of
whey and a bowl of oatmeal, and perhaps a few scoops of whey taken be-
tween lunch and dinner.
If whey does what the data suggests it does in the above studies, this should
be the most eective method to maximize the eects of whey on food (cal-
orie) intake in subsequent meals, as well as enhance the other metabolic
eects covered. If exercising, the schedule may be dierent, however, so
people should follow the pre and postworkout nutrition recommenda-
tions found in my ebooks Fat Loss Revealed and BodyBuilding Revealed, or
related advice from sports nutrition and bodybuildingrelated web sites.
Bodybuilding Revealed Fat Loss Revealed
Unified Theory Article References:
Farnsworth E, Luscombe ND, Noakes M, et al. Eect of a highpro-
tein, energyrestricted diet on body composition, glycemic control, and
lipid concentrations in overweight and obese hyperinsulinemic men and
women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Jul;78(1):319.
Baba NH, Sawaya S, Torbay N, et al. High protein vs high carbohydrate
hypoenergetic diet for the treatment of obese hyperinsulinemic subjects.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Nov;23(11):12026.
Parker B, Noakes M, Luscombe N, Clifton P. Eect of a highprotein,
highmonounsaturated fat weight loss diet on glycemic control and lipid
levels in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002 Mar;25(3):42530.
Skov AR, Toubro S, Ronn B, et al. Randomized trial on protein vs car-
bohydrate in ad libitum fat reduced diet for the treatment of obesity.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 May;23(5):52836.
Piatti PM, Monti F, Fermo I, et al. Hypocaloric, highprotein diet
improves glucose oxidation and spares lean body mass: comparison to
hypocaloric highcarbohydrate diet. Metabolism. 1994 Dec;43(12):
14817.
Layman DK, Boileau RA, Erickson DJ, et al. A reduced ratio of dietary
carbohydrate to protein improves body composition and blood lipid pro-
les during weight loss in adult women. J Nutr. 2003 Feb;133(2):411
7.
Golay A, Eigenheer C, Morel Y, et al. Weightloss with low or high car-
bohydrate diet? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996 Dec;20(12):1067
72.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
References
Meckling KA, Gauthier M, Grubb R, Sanford J. Eects of a hypoca-
loric, lowcarbohydrate diet on weight loss, blood lipids, blood pres-
sure, glucose tolerance, and body composition in freeliving overweight
women. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;80(11):1095105.
Borkman M, Campbell LV, Chisholm DJ, Storlien LH. Comparison of
the eects on insulin sensitivity of high carbohydrate and high fat diets
in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991 Feb;72(2):4327.
Brehm BJ, Seeley RJ, Daniels SR, DAlessio DA. A randomized trial
comparing a very low carbohydrate diet and a calorierestricted low fat
diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy women.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Apr;88(4):161723.
Garrow JS, Durrant M, Blaza S, et al. Te eect of meal frequency and
protein concentration on the composition of the weight lost by obese
subjects. Br J Nutr. 1981 Jan;45(1):515.
Agus MS, Swain JF, Larson CL, et al. Dietary composition and physiologic
adaptations to energy restriction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Apr;71(4):901
7.
Whey to Weight Loss References
Hall WL, Millward DJ, Long SJ, Morgan LM.Casein and whey exert
dierent eects on plasma amino acid proles, gastrointestinal hormone
secretion and appetite. Br J Nutr. 2003 Feb;89(2):23948.
Bowen J, Noakes M, Clifton P, Jenkins A, Batterham M.Acute eect
of dietary proteins on appetite, energy intake and glycemic response in
overweight men. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004;13(Suppl):S64.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
1.
2.
References
Anderson GH, Tecimer SN, Shah D, Zafar TA. Protein source, quantity,
and time of consumption determine the eect of proteins on shortterm
food intake in young men. J Nutr. 2004 Nov;134(11):30115.
Damien P. Belobrajdic, Graeme H. McIntosh, and Julie A. Owens. A
HighWheyProtein Diet Reduces Body Weight Gain and Alters In-
sulin Sensitivity Relative to Red Meat in Wistar Rats. J. Nutr. 2004
Jun;134:14541458.
Bouthegourd JC, Roseau SM, MakariosLahham L, et al. A preexercise
alphalactalbuminenriched whey protein meal preserves lipid oxida-
tion and decreases adiposity in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002
Sep;283(3):E56572.
Markus CR, Olivier B, Panhuysen GE, et al. Te bovine protein alpha
lactalbumin increases the plasma ratio of tryptophan to the other large
neutral amino acids, and in vulnerable subjects raises brain serotonin
activity, reduces cortisol concentration, and improves mood under stress.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jun;71(6):153644.
Frid AH, Nilsson M, Holst JJ, Bjorck IM. Eect of whey on blood glu-
cose and insulin responses to composite breakfast and lunch meals in
type 2 diabetic subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jul;82(1):6975.
Zemel MB. Role of calcium and dairy products in energy partition-
ing and weight management. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;79(5):907S
912S.
Additional References of Interest
Curzon G. Serotonin and appetite. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;600:521
30; discussion 5301.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
References
Pierson ME, Comstock JM, Simmons RD, et al. Synthesis and biologi-
cal evaluation of potent, selective, hexapeptide CCKA agonist anorec-
tic agents. J Med Chem. 1997 Dec 19;40(26):43027.
Blundell JE, King NA. Overconsumption as a cause of weight gain:
behaviouralphysiological interactions in the control of food intake
(appetite). Ciba Found Symp. 1996;201:13854; discussion 1548,
18893.
Zittel TT, von Elm B, Teichmann RK, et al. Cholecystokinin is partly
responsible for reduced food intake and body weight loss after total gas-
trectomy in rats. Am J Surg. 1995 Feb;169(2):26570.
Smith GP, Gibbs J. Are gut peptides a new class of anorectic agents? Am
J Clin Nutr 1992 Jan;55(1 Suppl):283S285S.
Strader AD, Woods SC. Gastrointestinal hormones and food intake.
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jan;128(1):17591.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
References
An important message from Will Brink:
Fat Loss Facts, Tips & Tricks contains a lot of
useful information, but is just the tip of the
iceberg. If permanent, healthy and awein-
spiring fat loss is what you really want, you
need Fat Loss Revealed, my fullycomprehen-
sive program for losing excess fat and optimiz-
ing your body composition. Fat Loss Revealed
is more than just an ebook, its the most up
todate resource available for fat loss, health
and tness information. When you purchase
the ebook, you receive 12 months of unlim-
ited access to the Members Zone, where you can ask questions and receive
support for your fat loss program. Te Members Zone is constantly being
updated with supplement reviews, articles, member features and down-
loads all of which will be free to you as an FLR member.
I hope that you like what you see, and decide to join me and my great mod-
erators in the FLR Members Zone. Youll meet others there who share
your goals. More importantly, they also share feedback and information.
I am so condent in my program, it comes with an ironclad, noques-
tionsasked, 100% moneyback guarantee.
Te Fat Loss Revealed ebook features:
40 complete reviews of supplement compounds,
A comprehensive diet program that works to shed those unwanted
pounds and keep them o for good,
Training advice and sample routines,
Will Brinks Fat Loss Revealed

Links to Members Zone resources and information,
Advanced fat loss, recipes, bonus reports and more,
Full integration with the Members Zone your online gateway for
information. Te Members Zone features over 220 brandname supple-
ment reviews, articles, book reviews, Q & As with Will and his team of
expert moderators, recipes, workout information, videos, diet tracking
tools, photo gallery and more!
All you need to do is click the link below and Fat Loss Revealed will be yours
within minutes.
When you purchase Fat Loss Revealed, youll discover:
...why resistance training is important for permanent fat loss. But
resistance training is more than just picking up weights and pushing/
pulling them around. Find out how the right kind of training can help
you keep, and even increase your lean body mass, while helping you raise
your metabolism and shed excess fat.
...which supplements are worth taking for your health as well as
for fat loss. Many supplements sold for fat loss have minimal eects on
your waistline, but oer signicant benets to your health and wellbe-
ing. In the right doses, many help ght free radicals that can cause pre-
mature aging, improve cognitive function, reduce stress, and improve
blood lipid levels.
...why aerobics arent the best kinds of exercises for losing fat. Aerobic
exercise burns some calories and improves cardiovascular conditioning.
Yet people do aerobics for years and never really seem to change their

Fat Loss Revealed
body compositions or appearance. Find out why, and how to use cardio
to your advantage.
...how the scale can be deceiving. Having a lean and t body isnt about
weight loss its about FAT loss. Who wants to lose weight if youre
left with a sagging, droopy body? If you want to lose the fat and keep
the muscle, you need to stop relying on the scale as a measure of prog-
ress. Learn how to measure your body fat %, so you can keep your diet
on track.
...which fats will actually help prevent fat storage, and help you burn
excess body fat. And yes you read that correctly. Not all fats are bad
for your waistline...learn which ones are, and which ones arent and
why.
...how eating extra meals each day will help you lose fat! One of the
rst things that people do when they want to lose extra ab is skimp on
breakfast, lunch and dinner or skip some meals completely. Find out
why this is the wrong approach, and why eating 5 6 meals is better.
...why fat and starchblocking supplements arent the curealls theyre
advertised to be. Do they work? What else might they be blocking?
...critical adjustments that you need to make to your diet to lose fat
permanently. Find out which carbohydrates will help you towards your
goals and which ones you should avoid. Find out the right amounts to
eat for your goals and activity level.
Youll nd out about all of these things and more when you download
your own copy of Fat Loss Revealed.
We are 100% condent that if you follow the information in the ebook,
you will lose your excess body fat...just the same as Wills personal training

clients have. Tis is not hitandmiss information: its been tested time
and time again. We know it works. And all it takes to get started are a few
clicks of the mouse.
Download your copy of Fat Loss Revealed now:
I Iost 30 pounds of Fat & 7 off My Waist!
It was obvious to me that I had to do some-
thing about my weight problem. Te prob-
lem was I did not know where to start, what
to eat, what exercise for my bodytype, or
what supplements worked or didnt. Tank-
fully I came across the FLR program.
Te Fat Loss Revealed program (FLR) is a fatloss blueprint that clearly
lays out, on a step by step basis, how to lose weightwhether the
goal is for better health (my initial goal) or getting ripped.
I was honored when the man himself, Will Brink, who writes for pop-
ular magazines and who has trained world class champions answered
questions that I posted on the forum.
I have denitely surpassed my initial goal of just losing extra bag-
gage Ive achieved a condition I just didnt think possible thanks to
Will Brinks information.
Sergio Lares
Fat Loss Revealed
I dropped from 52% body fat to 15% body fat!
Here are my before and after pictures. Te after was taken on my
48h birthday after a workout. Ive made more progress in 5 months
following the principles in your information than the entire (almost)
3 years of dieting and exercise. I never wouldve thought a guy my age
couldve done this!
Pat Sitton
I have lost over 50 pounds of Fat!
I have lost over 50 pounds of fat while gaining lean
muscle. I didnt do it as a crash, or quick x diet,
but as a steady healthy reduction in bodyweight as
outlined in Fat Loss Revealed.
Your direction and knowledge of diet and supple-
ments has been more than invaluable to my suc-
cess.
Tank you Will.
Amy Fox
Click the link:
To begin your fat loss journey. Youll re-
ceive instant access to the FLR Program: both
the 334 page best selling ebook AND 12
months free access to the FLR Members
Zone, complete with 220+ brand name sup-
plement reviews, sample diets and charts,
personal advice from my qualied, experi-
enced moderators, the Diet Planner, Meal Planner, Nutrition Database,
articles and exercise videos. And remember, your satisfaction is 100%
guaranteed!
Hope to see you soon in the Members Zone!
Sincerely Your Friend & Fat Loss Coach
Will Brink
Author, Researcher & Consultant
Fat Loss Revealed
Will Brinks Bodybuilding Revealed
Fat Loss Revealed is the ultimate guide to fat
loss supplements, diet and exercise. Many have
used it successfully as a guide to losing their
excess fat, and achieving leaner, healthier phy-
siques.
Losing fat, however, may only be the rst step
towards achieving your ideal body composi-
tion. Gaining muscle and strength is the logi-
cal next step, for both men and women.
If youre serious about taking that next step, then you need a copy of my
other book: Brinks Bodybuilding Revealed. BBR is focused on the subject
of gaining lean body mass, while minimizing fat gains. Just as with Fat Loss
Revealed, BBR is a comprehensive, no BS approach to muscle building: its
all there: nutrition, diet, workouts, and supplements. Teres also an active
Members Area, lled with articles and tools to help you plan and manage
your diet and exercise programs. Te forum is loaded with information on
nutrition, supplements, and exercises, with more material being added daily.
And as always, I am there, along with my expert moderators.
Brinks Bodybuilding Revealed isnt just for bodybuilders its for anyone
who wants to enhance their lean body mass, health, and appearance.
Ive gained Serious muscle mass and lost a lot of fat
quicker than ever before.
Hi Will: just a quick note to say thank you re-
ally...Ive gained serious muscle mass and lost
a lot of fat quicker than ever before with the
information and help you provided.
Scott Brouse
Ive lowered my body fat from
32% to 13%
I dont think there is a more complete teach-
ing tool on the subject of tness and nutri-
tion out on the market than Will Brinks Bodybuilding Revealed... Tis
program is perfect for anyone wanting the very best of health and t-
ness, taught by the very best in the business, regardless of your age.
Jim Donaldson
...Will Brinks Ebook is Simply Superb!
It would take pages to do complete justice to reviewing Wills latest piece
of work Brinks Bodybuilding Revealed be-
cause it is such a monumental piece of work. I
cant imagine the manhours that went into the
creation of this resource let alone the research
that had to be done.
In my eyes, even more important than the sheer
quantity of information is the honesty and ob-
jectiviity of the reviews and recommendations,
which is very important in the shady, biased and confusing bodybuild-
ing marketplace. In particular, Wills method of looking at what the
science says AND what the real world says is the best possible ap-
proach to making informed decisions about products or programs.
Overall, two very big enthusiastic thumbs up!
Tom Venuto New Jersey
Author of Burn Te Fat Feed Te Muscle
If youve learned the lessons that Fat Loss Revealed has to oer, then you
have what it takes to get the most out of Bodybuilding Revealed. Click the
link below to get started!
Success Is Virtually Guaranteed.
Combine Wills nutrition and supplement informa-
tion with my training tips and advice, and success
is virtually guaranteed.
Charles Poliquin B.Sc, M. Sc. Ottawa, Canada.
Author of Modern Trends In Strength Training, Ger-
man Body Composition, The Poliquin Principles, Win-
ning the Arms Race.
Youre Ready For Bodybuilding Revealed
Will Brink has helped thousands build muscle, lose
fat, and transform their bodies. And with his new
resource, Bodybuilding Revealed, Will provides one
of the most comprehensive muscle building resourc-
es available today. If youre ready to build muscle,
youre ready for Bodybuilding Revealed.
Dr. John Berardi, Ph.D., Adjunct Assistant Profes-
sor, Ottawa, Canada. Author of Scrawny To Brawny, Precision Nutri-
tion, Gourmet Nutrition.
Bodybuilding Revealed

Fat Loss Facts, Tips & Tricks

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fat Loss Facts, Tips & Tricks

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fat Loss Facts, Tips & Tricks

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fat Loss Facts, Tips & Tricks: 2

Brinks Unified Theory of Nutrition

Brinks Unified Theory of Nutrition

Brinks Unified Theory of Nutrition

The Simplest Weight Loss Tips No One Follows

The Whey to Weight Loss!

The Whey to Weight Loss!

Will Brinks Fat Loss Revealed

Will Brinks Fat Loss Revealed

Will Brinks Fat Loss Revealed

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.