Unit 6 Standards
Unit 6 Standards
Unit 6 Standards
Evidence Outcomes
Students can:
a. Present claims and findings, emphasizing salient
points in a focused, coherent manner with pertinent
descriptions, facts, details, and examples; use
appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear
pronunciation. (CCSS: SL.7.4)
b. Include multimedia components and visual displays
in presentations to clarify claims and findings and
emphasize salient points. (CCSS: SL.7.5)
c. Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and tasks,
demonstrating command of formal English when
indicated or appropriate. (CCSS: SL.7.6)
d. Prepare for audience and purpose by ensuring
proper length of presentation, suitable mode of
dress, appropriate topic, and engaging content
e. Implement strategies to rehearse presentation (such
as memorizing key phrases, creating note cards,
practicing with friends, etc.)
Inquiry Questions:
1. What background knowledge can presenters apply to their research?
2. Why is it important to use good research strategies when finding
information on a topic?
3. How do I know if a source is trustworthy?
4. How does the lack of a component (introduction, main idea, supporting
details, and conclusion) change the intent of a presentation?
Relevance and Application:
1. Learning to paraphrase is a skill that is used daily when summarizing.
2. Parents often ensure the well-being of their children by asking who, what,
when, where, why, and how questions.
3. Online resources offer access to a variety of primary and secondary
resources.
4. Electronic presentation tools can enhance oral presentations.
5. Online resources can be used to offer examples of quality presentations.
2. Small and large group discussions rely on active listening and the effective contributions of all
participants
Evidence Outcomes
Students can:
a. Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-onone, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 7
topics, texts, and issues, building on others ideas and expressing
their own clearly. (CCSS: SL.7.1)
i. Come to discussions prepared, having read or researched material
under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to
evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas
under discussion. (CCSS: SL.7.1a)
ii. Follow rules for collegial discussions, track progress toward
specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as
needed. (CCSS: SL.7.1)
iii. Pose questions that elicit elaboration and respond to others
questions and comments with relevant observations and ideas
that bring the discussion back on topic as needed. (CCSS:
SL.7.1c)
iv. Acknowledge new information expressed by others and, when
warranted, modify their own views. (CCSS: SL.7.1d)
b. Analyze the main ideas and supporting details presented in diverse
media and formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and explain
how the ideas clarify a topic, text, or issue under study. (CCSS:
SL.7.2)
c. Delineate a speakers argument and specific claims, evaluating the
soundness of the reasoning and the relevance and sufficiency of the
evidence. (CCSS: SL.7.3)
Inquiry Questions:
1. What makes an effective discussion?
2. How can everyone contribute without a few people
dominating the discussion?
3. What strategies do effective communicators use to
involve other people in the discussion?
Relevance and Application:
1. Journalists summarize complex issues for the general
public.
2. Political representatives integrate the needs and wants
of a community into new policy recommendations.
3. Real-time feedback technologies rely on the active
participation of all members to have a successful
discussion.
4. Musical ensembles require the cooperation of all players
to produce the desired sound.
Nature of Reading, Writing, and Communicating:
1. Skilled communicators demonstrate a balance between
listening and sharing.
2. Skilled listeners recognize that others have important
ideas.
Students can:
a. Use Key Ideas and Details to:
i. Cite several pieces of textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says
explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. (CCSS: RI.7.1)
ii. Determine two or more central ideas in a text and analyze their development over the
course of the text; provide an objective summary of the text. (CCSS: RI.7.2)
iii. Analyze the interactions between individuals, events, and ideas in a text (e.g., how
ideas influence individuals or events, or how individuals influence ideas or events).
(CCSS: RI.7.3)
b. Use Craft and Structure to:
i. Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including
figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the impact of a specific word
choice on meaning and tone. (CCSS: RI.7.4)
ii. Analyze the structure an author uses to organize a text, including how the major
sections contribute to the whole and to the development of the ideas. (CCSS: RI.7.5)
iii. Interpret a variety of graphical representations and connect them to information in the
text
iv. Determine an authors point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how the author
distinguishes his or her position from that of others. (CCSS: RI.7.6)
c. Use Integration of Knowledge and Ideas to:
i. Compare and contrast a text to an audio, video, or multimedia version of the text,
analyzing each mediums portrayal of the subject (e.g., how the delivery of a speech
affects the impact of the words). (CCSS: RI.7.7)
ii. Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the
reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.
(CCSS: RI.7.8)
iii. Analyze how two or more authors writing about the same topic shape their
presentations of key information by emphasizing different evidence or advancing
different interpretations of facts. (CCSS: RI.7.9)
iv. Organize and synthesize information from multiple sources, determining the relevance
of information
d. Use Range of Reading and Complexity of Text to:
i. By the end of the year, read and comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 68 text
complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range.
(CCSS: RI.7.10)
Inquiry Questions:
1. How does the author use language to convey his/her
viewpoint? (For example, pro-slaverythe words
used show a bias toward owning slaves.)
2. How can readers distinguish between facts and an
authors opinion? Why does this matter?
3. How are multiple sources valuable when you are
learning new information?
Relevance and Application:
1. The massive amount of information on the Internet
requires readers to distinguish accurate from
inaccurate information.
2. Using multiple sources is important to gather
accurate information.
3. When consumers are purchasing a product, they will
be bombarded with information that must be sorted
for accuracy, clarity, and organization to help guide
their decisions.
4. Sound, graphics, and multimedia combine with text
to influence perception.
Nature of Reading, Writing, and Communicating:
1. Readers think critically when they read to separate
fact from opinion.
2. Reading Standards for Literacy in Science and
Technical Subjects, Grades 6-8. (CCSS: RST.6-8.110)
3. Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social
Studies, Grades 6-8. (CCSS: RH.6-8.1-10)
Students can:
a. Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and
phrases based on grade 7 reading and content, choosing flexibly from a range of
strategies. (CCSS: L.7.4)
i. Use context (e.g., the overall meaning of a sentence or paragraph; a words
position or function in a sentence) as a clue to the meaning of a word or
phrase. (CCSS: L.7.4a)
ii. Use the tone of a passage to determine an approximate meaning of a word
iii. Use common, grade-appropriate Greek or Latin affixes and roots as clues to
the meaning of a word (e.g., belligerent, bellicose, rebel). (CCSS: L.7.4b)
iv. Consult general and specialized reference materials (e.g., dictionaries,
glossaries, thesauruses), both print and digital, to find the pronunciation of a
word or determine or clarify its precise meaning or its part of speech. (CCSS:
L.7.4c)
v. Verify the preliminary determination of the meaning of a word or phrase (e.g.,
by checking the inferred meaning in context or in a dictionary). (CCSS:
L.7.4d)
vi. Differentiate between primary and secondary meanings of words
b. Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships, and
nuances in word meanings. (CCCS: L.7.5)
i. Interpret figures of speech (e.g., literary, biblical, and mythological allusions)
in context. (CCCS: L.7.5a)
ii. Understand that language represents and constructs how readers perceive
events, people, groups, and ideas; recognize positive and negative
implications of language and identify how it can affect readers in different
ways
iii. Use the relationship between particular words (e.g., synonym/antonym,
analogy) to better understand each of the words. (CCCS: L.7.5b)
iv. Distinguish among the connotations (associations) of words with similar
denotations (definitions) (e.g., refined, respectful, polite, diplomatic,
condescending). (CCCS: L.7.5c)
c. Acquire and use accurately grade-appropriate general academic and domainspecific words and phrases; gather vocabulary knowledge when considering a
word or phrase important to comprehension or expression. (CCSS: L.7.6)
Inquiry Questions:
1. How is the use of the Greek root thermo significant in
todays world?
2. When a word has multiple meanings or pronunciations,
how does a reader select the correct one? (For example, I
want to contract with that person to detail my car. I hope
I dont contract the flu.)
3. What power do words have?
4. How do people adjust the words they use in different
contexts?
1. Answering a research question logically begins with obtaining and analyzing information from
a variety of sources
Evidence Outcomes
Students can:
a. Conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several
sources and generating additional related, focused questions for further
research and investigation. (CCSS: W.7.7)
i. Identify a topic for research, developing the central idea or focus
ii. Formulate open-ended research questions and identify potential
sources of information (such as reference materials, electronic media),
differentiating between primary and secondary source materials
b. Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using
search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each
source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while
avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. (CCSS:
W.7.8)
i. Use organizational features of electronic text (bulletin boards, search
engines, databases) to locate information
ii. Evaluate accuracy and usefulness of information, and the credibility of
the sources used
iii. Collect, interpret, and analyze relevant information; identify direct
quotes for use in the report and information to summarize or
paraphrase that will support the thesis or research question
c. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis,
reflection, and research. (CCSS: W.7.9)
i. Apply grade 7 Reading standards to literature (e.g., Compare and
contrast a fictional portrayal of a time, place, or character and a
historical account of the same period as a means of understanding how
authors of fiction use or alter history). (CCSS: W.7.9a)
ii. Apply grade 7 Reading standards to literary nonfiction (e.g. Trace and
evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether
the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to
support the claims). (CCSS: W.7.9b)
Evidence Outcomes
Students can:
a. Synthesize information from multiple
sources using logical organization,
effective supporting evidence, and
variety in sentence structure
b. Write reports based on research that
includes quotations, footnotes, or
endnotes, and use standard bibliographic
format to document sources or a works
cited page
c. Prepare presentation of research findings
(written, oral, or a visual product) for
clarity of content and effect, and
grammatically correct use of language,
spelling, and mechanics
Inquiry Questions:
1. How do writers summarize information in their own words?
2. How do presenters determine if they will deliver their presentation in written, oral, or
visual form?
3. Which method is the most interesting to you when you are a member of the
audience? Explain your thinking.
4. Before beginning research, why is it important to organize and have a plan?
5. How do you determine if your method of presentation is most effective?
3. Reasoned material is evaluated for its quality using both its logic and its use of a medium
Evidence Outcomes
Students can:
a. Identify low-credibility stories by noticing
vested interests or passion associated
with content
b. Obtain useful information from standard
news stories
c. Identify the purpose(s) or agenda of
media presentations
d. Consider alternative perspectives of
media presentations
Inquiry Questions:
1. What point(s) of view is (are) being dismissed or played down?
2. How can people gain access to the point of view being negated (from those who most
intelligently understand it)?
3. How does using multiple perspectives and points of view expand peoples thinking?
4. What makes a story have low credibility?
5. What makes a story or text have high credibility?
6. What makes a presentation have clarity for the audience?
7. How are people influenced by something in the news?
8. What are the implications if people receive poor, unreliable information? How does
that influence the quality of thinking?
Relevance and Application:
1. Readers can identify low-credibility stories by noticing vested interests or passions
associated with content experts.
2. Consumers identify the purpose(s) or agenda of media presentations.
3. Making fair-minded, informed decisions will help citizens contribute to society in a
quality manner.
4. Awards are given to a well-reasoned documentary about issues.
5. Entertainment that is precise like judging games need legitimate processes to be
seen as fun and credible.
6. Voting booths, focus group tools, and electronic surveys take a reasoned series of
questions and trap feedback, opinions, and choices.
Nature of Reading, Writing, and Communicating:
1. The quality of thinking impacts peoples lives.
2. For thinking to improve, people must ask critical questions.
3. Researchers ask themselves the questions, What is the source for this information?
Is it credible? How do I know that?