The Current State of Head and Neck Injuries in Extreme Sports
The Current State of Head and Neck Injuries in Extreme Sports
The Current State of Head and Neck Injuries in Extreme Sports
This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are
credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGEs Web site
at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
1
Downloaded from ojs.sagepub.com by guest on February 7, 2015
Sharma et al
METHODS
The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System
(NEISS) of the Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) was used to acquire data for this study from
2000 to 2011. The CPSC conducts yearly sampling frames
of all active emergency departments in the United States,
including information regarding the total number of
emergency department visits. The NEISS is a national
probability sample of 100 hospitals in the United States
and its territories.1 Patient information is collected from
each NEISS hospital for every emergency visit involving
an injury associated with consumer products, such as
sporting equipment. Data are updated on a daily basis,
and any missing information is obtained by telephone
interviews with patients within the first week after
injury. From this sample, the total number of injuries
treated in hospital emergency rooms nationwide can be
estimated. The sampling procedure and the statistical
basis for calculation of national estimates based on the
NEISS data are validated approaches and described on
the CPSC website. The derivation of sampling weights
used by the NEISS is well established and used by researchers and government agencies.18 Sampling weights were
applied to the NEISS data to account for selection, for number of annual emergency department visits for each hospital, and for hospitals that do not respond. After being
weighted, the NEISS data provides estimates for the total
number of specific consumer productrelated sports injuries in the United States. Variables included in the standard NEISS case report are treatment date, sex, race,
diagnostic category, body part injured, patient disposition, and location of injury. As a part of the Consumer
Product Safety Mission, the NEISS database serves as a
reliable and reproducible source for a wide range of epidemiological subjects.
Injuries associated with 7 extreme sports were identified
and examined using the NEISS consumer product codes in
this study: snowboarding (5031), snowmobiling (1290),
surfing (1261), mountain biking (5033), motocross (5036),
skateboarding (1333), and snow skiing (3283). Because of
the way the NEISS categorizes their product codes, motocross included 2-wheeled, powered, off-road vehicles such
as dirt bikes and trail bikes; mopeds and mini-bikes were
excluded. Surfing included injuries related to windsurfing.
TABLE 1
Common Head and Neck Injuries in Extreme Sports (2000-2011)
Summer Sports, n (%)
Surfing
Head injuries
Concussion
Contusion/abrasion
Fracture
Laceration
Total
Neck injuries
Contusion/abrasion
Fracture
Laceration
Strain/sprain
Total
Other head and neck injuries
Total, summer sports
3242 (8.2)
2097 (5.3)
173 (0.4)
14,990 (37.7)
20,502 (51.6)
344
1209
187
10,112
11,852
7404
39,758
(0.9)
(3.0)
(0.5)
(25.4)
(29.8)
(18.6)
(100)
Mountain Biking
Motocross
Skateboarding
4530 (29.7)
1080 (7.1)
115 (0.8)
1182 (7.8)
6907 (45.3)
22,788 (29.1)
5164 (6.6)
961 (1.2)
3211 (4.1)
32,124 (41.1)
28,328 (21.9)
14,703 (11.3)
3544 (2.7)
17,189 (13.3)
63,764 (49.2)
221 (1.5)
527 (3.5)
69 (0.5)
2059 (13.5)
2876 (18.9)
5450 (35.8)
15,233 (100)
1321 (1.7)
1452 (1.9)
825 (1.1)
10,626 (13.6)
14,224 (18.2)
31,888 (40.8)
78,236 (100)
442 (0.3)
42 (0.0)
151 (0.1)
6637 (5.1)
7272 (5.6)
58,564 (45.2)
129,600 (100)
Snowmobiling
Snow Skiing
42,811 (43.9)
6963 (7.1)
403 (0.4)
6514 (6.7)
56,691 (58.1)
4054 (24.6)
1290 (7.8)
162 (1.0)
992 (6.0)
6498 (39.5)
34,897 (41.9)
4488 (5.4)
625 (0.8)
5507 (6.6)
45,517 (54.6)
375 (0.4)
784 (0.8)
88 (0.1)
13,645 (14.0)
14,892 (15.3)
25,944 (26.6)
97,527 (100)
581 (3.5)
206 (1.3)
349 (2.1)
3886 (23.6)
5022 (30.5)
4928 (30.0)
16,448 (100)
230 (0.3)
1039 (1.2)
181 (0.2)
14,009 (16.8)
15,459 (18.6)
22,337 (26.8)
83,313 (100)
RESULTS
A total of 4,083,691 injuries were reported for all 7
extreme sports between 2000 and 2011, of which 460,115
(11.3%) were HNIs. Of the total reported HNIs, 381,760
(83%) were head injuries and 78,355 (17%) were neck injuries. The average number of HNIs was 38,385 per year.
Regression analysis demonstrated a significant increase
Sharma et al
DISCUSSION
This study presents previously unknown data and establishes incidence rates of HNIs in extreme sports. Between
2000 and 2011, over 4,000,000 injuries occurred in
extreme sports, of which 11.3% were HNIs. Although the
risk of HNI while participating in extreme sports was low,
there was a significant increase in the number of HNIs
from 2000 to 2011. Furthermore, as participation grows
in these nontraditional sports, physicians need to be
aware of the distribution of injuries specific to extreme
sports to implement optimal treatment and prevention
programs.
Concussions were the most common HNI among
extreme sports participants (Table 1). The risk of suffering
a concussion was highest in snowboarding and skateboarding. Recently, there has been a lot of media attention
placed on the long-term sequelae of concussions suffered
in mainstream sports. It is well known that permanent
neurological deficits are related to severe and recurrent
concussions.12 Most professional and collegiate sports
and many high school organizations have adopted timeeffective concussion policies12 and implemented use of
tools like the SCAT 2 on the sidelines. One of the medical
challenges with extreme sports is patient accessibility.
Many extreme sports take place in environments where
medical care may not be readily available on site, with the
exception of participation in professional competitions.
Because of these challenges, greater emphasis needs to
be placed on proper helmet and safety strategies to prevent participant concussions.
In addition to concussions, severe injuries are another
concern in extreme sports. Skateboarders were found to
have the highest risk of skull fractures compared with the
5 other extreme sports. Surfers had the highest risk
of neck fracture, with a surprising 38 times increased risk
compared with skateboarders. While the incidence of severe
injuries was low for the studied extreme sports, skull and
neck fractures can have devastating effects on quality of life.
Physicians need to be aware of these trends in activities with
high rates of severe injuries, such as skateboarding, so that
they can provide proper patient advice, prevention care, and
safety equipment. Additionally, our study found that 12% of
Figure 3. Distribution of severe injuries and concussions in individual extreme sports. (A) Occurrence of concussions and (B)
occurrence of severe injuries.
TABLE 2
Risk of Head and Neck Injuries in Extreme Sports
Sport
Mountain biking
Snowmobiling
Snow skiing
Surfing
Snowboarding
Skateboarding
Incidence
Rate Ratio
1.08
1.64
2.46
7.00
8.60
10.21
1
1.51
2.28
6.49
7.97
9.46
TABLE 3
Incidence Rate of Concussions in Extreme Sports
Sport
Mountain biking
Snowmobiling
Surfing
Snow skiing
Skateboarding
Snowboarding
Incidence
Rate Ratio
50
60
103
152
415
534
1
1.2
2.06
3.04
8.3
10.68
TABLE 4
Incidence Rate of Skull and Neck Fractures
in Extreme Sports
Incidence
Rate Ratio
1
2
2
4
9
55
1
2
2
4
9
55
1
5
6
7
13
38
1
5
6
7
13
38
Sharma et al
Limitations were present in this study. The NEISS database obtains information from only emergency room visits,
thus excluding patients who go untreated or are treated in outpatient settings. Furthermore, NEISS data are restricted to
the product-code system. The combination of these 2 factors
limits how accurately we can predict rates and trends in the
general population. Additionally, the population of the study
includes both recreational and competitive sports participation; therefore, it may not accurately reflect the risk of individuals participating in an extreme sport. A study using a
database that tracks injuries in organized extreme sports competitions (eg, X Games) would be a useful area of future focus.
CONCLUSION
This study helps educate participants and physicians about
the types of HNIs associated with the growing arena of
extreme sports. This study offers important data regarding
the trends of HNI in extreme sports. HNIs can greatly alter
a persons quality of life, and as participation in these sports
increases, understanding the incidence of HNI will assist in
implementing effective medical prevention programs and
proper safety equipment practices. More research regarding
the long-term outcomes of HNI in extreme sports needs to
be done to provide sports medicine physicians with a comprehensive clinical picture of these devastating injuries.
REFERENCES
1. (CPSC) USCPSC. The NEISSThe National Electronic Injury Surveillance
System: a tool for researchers. US Consumer Product Safety Commission. http://www.cpsc.gov/en/ResearchStatistics/NEISS-Injury-Data/.
Accessed February 13, 2013.
2. Ackery A, Hagel BE, Provvidenza C, Tator CH. An international review
of head and spinal cord injuries in alpine skiing and snowboarding. Inj
Prev. 2007;13:368-375.
3. Balthrop PM, Nyland J, Roberts CS. Risk factors and musculoskeletal
injuries associated with all-terrain vehicle accidents. J Emerg Med.
2009;36:121-131.
4. Bergeron MF, Engebretsen L. Protecting elite athletes in extreme and
challenging environments: advancing the dialogue. Br J Sports Med.
2012;46:769.
5. Brymer E, Schweitzer R. Extreme sports are good for your health: a
phenomenological understanding of fear and anxiety in extreme
sport. J Health Psychol. 2013;18:477-487.