Nebosh
Nebosh
Nebosh
INT ER N ATION AL
L AB OU R
OR G AN IZ AT ION
Geneva, 2005
G E N E VA
/5
MEISI/2005/8
INT ER N ATION AL
L AB OU R
OR G AN IZ AT ION
G E N E VA
Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short
excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or
translation, application should be made to the Publications Bureau (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22,
Switzerland. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications.
Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road,
London W1T 4LP [Fax: (+44) (0)20 7631 5500; email: cla@cla.co.uk], in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 [Fax: (+1) (978) 750 4470; email: info@copyright.com] or in other countries with associated
Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose.
The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein
do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any
country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does
not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and
any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval.
ILO publications can be obtained through major booksellers or ILO local offices in many countries, or direct from ILO Publications,
International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. Catalogues or lists of new publications are available free of charge from the
above address, or by email: pubvente@ilo.org
Visit our web site: www.ilo.org/publns
Contents
Page
Glossary
vii
Introduction
1.
2.
General provisions..................................................................................................................
1.1.
Objectives .....................................................................................................................
1.2.
Application ...................................................................................................................
1.3.
Industry characteristics...........................................................................................................
2.1.
2.2.
Occupational hazards....................................................................................................
NATIONAL FRAMEWORK.......................................................................................
General duties.........................................................................................................................
3.1.
Cooperation ..................................................................................................................
3.2.
3.3.
Labour inspectorates.....................................................................................................
3.4.
Employers.....................................................................................................................
3.5.
10
3.6.
12
3.7.
13
14
4.1.
Introduction ..................................................................................................................
14
4.2.
14
4.3.
14
15
16
16
5.1.
16
5.2.
17
5.3.
Chemical hazards..........................................................................................................
27
5.4.
Safety hazards...............................................................................................................
35
5.5.
Ergonomics...................................................................................................................
43
PART I.
3.
4.
4.4.
PART II.
5.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
iii
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
iv
45
6.1.
Hazard description........................................................................................................
45
6.2.
45
6.3.
46
6.4.
47
6.5.
47
48
7.1.
General..........................................................................................................................
48
7.2.
49
7.3.
49
7.4.
49
7.5.
50
7.6.
50
7.7.
50
Surface preparation.................................................................................................................
53
8.1.
Hazard description........................................................................................................
53
8.2.
53
54
9.1.
General..........................................................................................................................
54
9.2.
54
9.3.
55
9.4.
Tapping.........................................................................................................................
55
9.5.
Bottom drop..................................................................................................................
55
9.6.
55
9.7.
56
9.8.
56
9.9.
Abrasive wheels............................................................................................................
56
56
57
58
58
58
Coating lines...........................................................................................................................
60
60
60
60
61
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
12.
62
62
62
63
63
63
14.
65
15.
66
66
67
68
68
69
69
70
70
71
71
72
73
73
75
75
75
76
Work organization...................................................................................................................
78
78
78
78
Special protection....................................................................................................................
79
79
79
79
19.4. HIV/AIDS.....................................................................................................................
80
80
81
13.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
Bibliography......................................................................................................................................
82
Annexes
I.
85
II.
Workers health surveillance (adapted from the ILO Technical and ethical guidelines
for workers health surveillance, 1998) .................................................................................
87
90
92
Occupational exposure limits for hazardous substances, electric and magnetic fields,
optical radiation, heat, noise and vibration.............................................................................
101
105
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
vi
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
Glossary
In this code of practice, the following terms have the meanings hereby assigned to
them:
Active monitoring: The ongoing activities which check that hazard identification, risk
assessment and the appropriate preventive and protective measures, as well as the
arrangements to implement the occupational safety and health (OSH) management system,
conform to defined criteria.
Asbestos: The fibrous form of mineral silicates belonging to rock-forming minerals of
the serpentine group, i.e. chrysotile (white asbestos), and of the amphibole group,
i.e. actinolite, amosite (brown asbestos), anthophylite, crocidolite (blue asbestos),
tremolite, or any mixture containing one or more of these.
Asbestos dust: Airborne particles of asbestos or settled particles of asbestos that are
liable to become airborne in the working environment.
Asphyxiant: A substance that causes injury by decreasing the amount of oxygen
available to the body. Asphyxiants may act by displacing air from an enclosed space, or by
interfering with the bodys ability to absorb and transport oxygen.
Audit: A systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining evidence and
evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which defined criteria are fulfilled.
Audits should be conducted by competent persons internal or external to the facility who
are independent of the activity being audited.
Competent authority: A minister, government department or other public authority
with the power to issue regulations, orders or other instructions having the force of law.
Under national laws or regulations, competent authorities may be appointed with
responsibilities for specific activities, such as for the implementation of national policy and
procedures for the protection of iron and steel workers.
Competent person: A person with suitable training, and sufficient knowledge,
experience and skill, for the performance of the specific work.
Contractor: A person or an enterprise providing services to an employer at the facility
in accordance with national laws and regulations, or with agreed specifications, terms and
conditions. For the purpose of this code of practice, contractors include principal
contractors, subcontractors and labour supply agents.
Dangerous occurrence: Readily identifiable event, as defined under national laws and
regulations, with potential to cause injury or disease to people at work or the general
public, for example a near miss or a near hit.
Employer: Any physical or legal person that employs one or more workers.
Engineering controls: Use of technical measures such as enclosure, ventilation and
workplace design to minimize exposure.
Engulfment: The condition of being swallowed up or overwhelmed by loose material,
for example in the cave-in of an unshored trench. Engulfment usually causes injury by
asphyxiation or crushing.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
vii
viii
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
ix
Worker: Any person who performs work, either regularly or temporarily, for an
employer.
Workers health surveillance: A generic term which covers procedures and
investigations to assess workers health in order to detect and identify any abnormality.
The results of surveillance should be used to protect and promote the health of the
individual, collective health at the workplace, and the health of the exposed working
population. Health assessment procedures may include, but are not limited to, medical
examinations, biological monitoring, radiological examinations, questionnaires or a review
of health records.
Workers and their representatives: Where reference is made in this code of practice
to workers and their representatives, the intention is that, where representatives exist, they
should be consulted as the means to achieving appropriate worker participation. In some
instances, it may be appropriate to involve all workers and all representatives.
Workers representative: In accordance with the Workers Representatives
Convention, 1971 (No. 135), any person who is recognized as such by national law or
practice, whether they are:
(a) trade union representatives, namely, representatives designated or elected by trade
unions or by members of such unions; or
(b) elected representatives, namely, representatives who are freely elected by the workers
of the enterprise in accordance with provisions of national laws or regulations or of
collective agreements and whose functions do not include activities which are
recognized as the exclusive prerogative of trade unions in the country concerned.
Workplace: Area where workers need to be, or to go to, on the instruction of an
employer to carry out their work. A workplace need not be a fixed location.
Work-related injury: Death or any personal injury resulting from an occupational
accident.
Work-related injuries, ill health and diseases: Negative impacts on health arising
from exposure to chemical, biological, physical and organizational factors at work.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
Introduction
In accordance with the decision taken by the Governing Body of the ILO at its
288th Session in November 2003, a Meeting of Experts on Safety and Health in the Iron
and Steel Industry was convened in Geneva from 1 to 9 February 2005 to draw up and
adopt a revised code of practice on safety and health in the iron and steel industry. The
Meeting was composed of seven experts appointed following consultations with
Governments, eight experts appointed following consultations with the Employers group
and eight experts appointed following consultations with the Workers group of the
Governing Body.
The original code of practice on safety and health in the iron and steel industry was
adopted at a meeting of experts in 1981. This new code, which reflects the many changes
in the industry, its workforce, the roles of the competent authorities, employers, workers
and their organizations, and on the development of new ILO instruments on occupational
safety and health, focuses on the production of iron and steel and basic iron and steel
products, such as rolled and coated steel, including from recycled material. It does not deal
with the mining of raw materials for iron and steel production, which is covered by the
Safety and Health in Mines Convention, 1995 (No. 176), and by codes of practice on
safety and health in coal mines (1986) and safety and health in opencast mines (1991), nor
does it deal with the fabrication of commercial steel products.
This code of practice is based on principles established in international instruments
relevant to the protection of workers safety and health. The first two chapters deal with
the objectives and application of the code. The next two chapters address, within a national
framework, the responsibilities, duties and rights of the competent authority, the labour
inspectorate, employers, workers and their organizations, suppliers, manufacturers and
designers, and contractors, and occupational safety and health (OSH) management systems
and services and OSH reporting.
Part II of the code addresses different operations commonly used in the production of
iron and steel from coke ovens to steel furnaces and foundries, to rolling mills, coating
lines and recycling. It also covers transport, competence and training, personal protective
equipment, emergency preparedness, and special protection and hygiene issues. Each
section describes hazards, assesses risk and provides guidance on eliminating or
controlling risk.
Where appropriate, the code draws on relevant parts of existing ILO instruments,
including: Occupational safety and health in the iron and steel industry (Geneva, 1983);
Safety in the use of chemicals at work (Geneva, 1993); Management of alcohol- and drugrelated issues in the workplace (Geneva, 1996); Technical and ethical guidelines for
workers health surveillance (Geneva, 1998); Guidelines on occupational safety and health
management systems (Geneva, 2001); Safety in the use of synthetic vitreous fibre
insulation wools (glass wool, rock wool, slag wool) (Geneva, 2001); Ambient factors in the
workplace (Geneva, 2001); HIV/AIDS and the world of work (Geneva, 2001); and Safety
and health in the non-ferrous metals industries (Geneva, 2003). The annexes include
information on hazard identification, risk assessment and control and, drawn from relevant
ILO instruments, information on workers health surveillance, surveillance of the working
environment and on establishing an OSH management system. As these instruments are
updated, the references to them in electronic versions of this code will be adjusted
accordingly. There is also information on exposure limits and on chemicals used in the iron
and steel industry.
The practical recommendations of ILO codes of practice are intended for the use of
all those, both in the public and private sectors, who have responsibility for safety and
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
health management in relation to specific occupational hazards (e.g. chemicals, heat, noise
and vibration), sectors of activity (e.g. forestry, mining), or equipment. Codes of practice
are not intended to replace national laws or regulations or accepted standards. They are
drawn up with the objective of providing guidance, in accordance with the provisions of
national laws and regulations, to all those who may be engaged, through social dialogue, in
the framing of provisions of this kind or in elaborating programmes of prevention and
protection at the national or enterprise levels. They are addressed in particular to
governmental and public authorities, employers and workers and their organizations as
well as management and safety and health committees in related enterprises.
Codes of practice are primarily designed as a basis for prevention and protective
measures and are considered as ILO technical standards in occupational safety and health.
They contain general principles and specific guidance which concern in particular the
surveillance of the working environment and of workers health; education and training;
record-keeping; the role and duties of the competent authority, employers, workers,
manufacturers and suppliers; and consultation and cooperation.
The provisions of this code of practice should be read in the context of the conditions
in the country proposing to use the guidance it contains, the scale of operation involved
and technical possibilities. In this regard, the needs of developing countries are also taken
into consideration.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
1.
General provisions
1.1.
Objectives
1.1.1. This code of practice, which is a revision of the one adopted in 1981, should
contribute:
(a) to protecting workers in the iron and steel industry from workplace hazards and to
preventing or reducing work-related injuries and diseases, ill health and incidents;
(b) to assisting and facilitating the improved management of occupational safety and
health (OSH) issues at the workplace;
(c) to promoting effective consultation and cooperation between governments and
employers and workers organizations in the improvement of OSH in the production
of iron and steel.
1.1.2. This code of practice should assist in:
(a) establishing a coherent national policy and principles on the occupational safety and
health and welfare of workers in iron- and steel-making facilities and on the
protection of the general working environment;
(b) establishing the respective duties and responsibilities of the authorities, employers,
workers and others involved and making arrangements for a structured cooperation
between them;
(c) improving knowledge and competence;
(d) promoting the implementation and integration of consistent OSH management
systems with a view to improving working conditions.
1.1.3. This code of practice provides practical guidance on the role and obligations of
the competent authorities and the responsibilities, duties and rights of employers, workers
and all other parties involved, with regard to workplace hazards. In particular it covers:
(a) the setting up of legal, administrative and effective frameworks for the prevention and
reduction of hazards and risks;
(b) the aims of any mechanisms for identifying, eliminating, minimizing and controlling
hazards;
(c) the assessment of risks and hazards to the safety and health of workers and the
measures that need to be taken;
(d) the surveillance of the working environment and workers health;
(e) emergency procedures and first aid;
(f)
(g) the establishment of a system to record, report and monitor occupational accidents
and diseases, and dangerous occurrences.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
1.2.
Application
1.2.1. This code of practice should provide guidance, in accordance with the
provisions of national laws and regulations, to:
(a) all those government authorities, workers and employers organizations and industry
associations, whether legislative or advisory, whose activities influence the safety,
health and welfare of workers in the iron and steel industry;
(b) all those individuals at the level of the iron- and steel-making facilities, i.e.
employers, persons in control of premises, and workers and contractors, as
appropriate to their duties and responsibilities for safety and health;
(c) all operations in the iron and steel industry.
1.2.2. A number of OSH measures implemented to protect workers health and safety
in the iron and steel industry may have an effect, directly or indirectly, on the general
environment. This relationship should be taken into account by both the competent
authorities and employers in designing and implementing their respective policies and
programmes.
1.2.3. The provisions of this code should be considered as a minimum. They are not
intended to replace applicable laws, regulations or accepted standards laying down higher
requirements. More stringent applicable requirements should have priority over the
provisions of this code. In the absence of national laws and regulations on a particular
OSH issue, guidance should be drawn from this code of practice, as well as from other
relevant nationally and internationally recognized instruments.
1.2.4. The code contains references to those institutions responsible for the delivery
and award of vocational qualifications. Such institutions are urged to review existing
curricula in the light of the codes recommendations for training and the allocation of
worksite responsibilities.
1.3.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
2.
Industry characteristics
2.1.
2.2.
Occupational hazards
2.2.1. Operations in the iron and steel industry may expose workers to a wide range
of hazards or workplace activities or conditions that could cause incidents, injury, death, ill
health or diseases. These are discussed in the following chapters.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
General duties
3.1.
Cooperation
3.1.1. This code recognizes that an effective safety and health system requires joint
commitment between the competent authority, employers, workers and their
representatives. The parties should cooperate in a constructive manner to ensure that the
objectives of this code of practice are achieved.
3.1.2. Measures for cooperation should be taken relating to the elimination or control
of hazards or risks to safety and health from the production of iron and steel. These
measures should include the following:
(i)
(ii) workers should cooperate as closely as possible with their fellow workers and their
employers in the discharge by the employers of their responsibilities, and should
comply with all prescribed procedures and practices;
(iii) suppliers should provide employers with all necessary information as is available and
required for the evaluation of any unusual hazards or risks to safety and health that
might result from a particular hazardous factor in the production of iron and steel.
3.2.
Competent authority
3.2.1. The competent authority should, in the light of national conditions and practice
and the provisions of this code, in consultation with the most representative organizations
of employers and workers concerned:
(i)
(ii) consider making new, or updating existing, statutory provisions for eliminating or
controlling hazards in the production of iron and steel.
3.2.2. Statutory provisions should include regulations, approved codes of practice,
exposure limits and procedures for consultation and dissemination of information.
3.2.3. The competent authority should establish:
(i)
systems, including criteria, for classifying substances that may be hazardous to health,
i.e. raw materials, intermediary products, final products and by-products that are used
and produced in the production of iron and steel;
(ii) systems and criteria for assessing the relevance of the information required to
determine whether one of the substances listed above is hazardous;
(iii) requirements for marking and labelling substances provided for use in the production
of iron and steel, taking into account the need to harmonize such systems
internationally;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(iv) criteria for the information contained in the substance safety data sheets received by
employers; and
(v) systems and criteria for identifying safety hazards and appropriate risk control
measures relating to machinery, equipment, processes and operations used in the
production of iron and steel.
The competent authority should set out the necessary rules to determine these criteria
and requirements, but is not necessarily expected to undertake technical tasks or laboratory
tests itself.
3.2.4. The competent authority should secure the enforcement of national laws and
regulations concerning the policy mentioned above through an adequate and appropriate
system of inspection. The system of enforcement should provide for corrective measures
and adequate penalties for violations of national laws and regulations concerning the
policy.
3.2.5. If justified on safety and health grounds, the competent authority should:
(i)
(ii) require advance notification and authorization before such processes and substances
are used; or
(iii) specify categories of workers who, for reasons of safety and health, are not allowed to
use specified processes or substances, or are allowed to use them but only under
conditions prescribed in accordance with national laws or regulations.
3.2.6. The competent authority should ensure that guidance is provided to employers
and workers to help them comply with their legal obligations under the policy. The
competent authority should provide assistance to employers, workers and their
representatives.
3.3.
Labour inspectorates
3.3.1. Labour inspectorates should, in a manner prescribed by national laws and
regulations:
(a) periodically carry out inspections in the presence of the employers and workers
representatives, and monitor compliance with and enforce all relevant laws and
regulations at iron- and steel-making facilities;
(b) assist employers, workers and their representatives with respect to their occupational
safety and health responsibilities, duties and rights;
(c) monitor the safety and health requirements and performance of comparable national
or international iron- and steel-making facilities to provide feedback for further
development and improvement of safety measures;
(d) participate, in cooperation with the recognized organizations of employers and
workers, in formulating and updating safety rules and measures to be adopted at
national and enterprise levels.
3.3.2. Labour inspectors should, in a manner prescribed by national laws and
regulations:
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(a) be competent to deal with the safety and health issues associated with the iron and
steel industry and be able to provide support and advice;
(b) notify the employer, the workers concerned and their representatives, as well as safety
and health committees, of the findings of inspections for the implementation of
required remedial action;
(c) have the authority to remove workers from situations involving an imminent an
serious danger to life or health;
(d) periodically determine whether an existing OSH management system or OSH
elements are in place, adequate and effective.
3.3.3. The authority, rights, procedures and responsibilities of labour inspectors
should be communicated to all affected parties.
3.4.
Employers
3.4.1. Employers have a duty to protect and promote the safety and health of
workers. Employers should comply with the measures to be taken regarding hazards or
risks to safety and health from the production of iron and steel, including appropriate
standards, codes and guidelines as prescribed, approved or recognized by the competent
authority.
3.4.2. Employers should provide and maintain workplaces, plant, equipment, tools
and machinery, and should organize work so as to eliminate or, if this is not possible,
control hazards and risks in the production of iron and steel, and be consistent with
national laws and regulations.
3.4.3. Employers should set out in writing their respective programmes and
arrangements as part of their general policy in the field of OSH, and the various
responsibilities exercised under these arrangements. This information should be clearly
communicated to their workers by oral, written or other suitable means, commensurate
with the ability of the workers.
3.4.4. Employers, in consultation with workers and their representatives, should:
(i)
make an assessment of the hazards and risks to the safety and health of workers
arising from the production of iron and steel, requesting and making effective use of
the information provided by the supplier of equipment or materials and from other
reasonably available sources; and
(ii) take all necessary measures to reduce exposure to eliminate or, if this not possible,
control risks to safety and health identified in the above risk assessment.
3.4.5. In taking preventive and protective measures, the employer should address the
hazardous factor or risk in accordance with the hierarchy set out in paragraph 11.5 of
Annex IV. If the employers, workers or their representatives cannot agree, the issue should
be referred to the competent authorities in accordance with paragraph 3.2.6.
3.4.6. Employers should make the necessary arrangements to provide for:
(i)
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(iii) the application and use of appropriate control measures and the periodic review of
their effectiveness;
(iv) education and training to managers, supervisors and workers, and to workers safety
and health representatives, on issues relating to hazards in the production of iron and
steel; and
(v) where necessary, measures to deal with emergencies and accidents, including first-aid
arrangements.
3.4.7. OSH measures should not involve any expenditure for the workers.
3.4.8. Employers should have in place arrangements to:
(i)
deal with accidents, dangerous occurrences and incidents that may involve hazards or
risks to safety and health from the production of iron and steel; and
(ii) eliminate or control any risk to the safety and health of workers, and thereby to the
public and the environment.
3.4.9. When an employer is also a national or multinational enterprise with more than
one establishment, the employer should provide safety and health measures relating to the
prevention and control of, and protection against, injuries and risks to safety and health
from the production of iron and steel to all workers without discrimination.
3.4.10. In accordance with the Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning
Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (1977, Rev. 2000), in all countries in which
they operate, multinational enterprises should make available to their workers and to the
representatives of the workers at the facility and, on request, to the competent authorities
and the workers and employers organizations, information on the standards related to
injuries and risks to safety and health from the production of iron and steel, relevant to
their local operations, which they observe in other countries. The findings of any safety
and health studies should be disclosed.
3.4.11. Employers should initiate and maintain a process of consultation and
cooperation with workers and their representatives concerning all aspects of safety in the
production of iron and steel specified in this code, in particular as regards the measures of
prevention and protection listed in paragraphs 3.4.1 to 3.4.10. This process should be
carried out within the framework of safety and health committees, as recommended by
Convention No. 155, through another mechanism determined by the competent authority
or by voluntary agreements.
3.4.12. Employers should verify:
(i)
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
3.5.
(ii) take all steps to eliminate or control hazards or risks to themselves and to others
arising during the production of iron and steel, including the proper care and use of
protective clothing, facilities and equipment placed at their disposal for this purpose;
(iii) report forthwith to their immediate supervisor or safety and health representative any
unusual conditions at the workplace or affecting installations and equipment which
they believe could present a hazard or risk to their safety or health or that of other
people arising from the production of iron and steel, and which they cannot deal with
effectively themselves;
10
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(iv) cooperate with the employer and other workers to permit compliance with the duties
and responsibilities placed on the employer and workers.
3.5.4. Workers should participate in instruction and training programmes provided by
the employer or required by the competent authority, and should demonstrate such
acquired knowledge and understanding of safety and health measures on the job. Workers
and their representatives should review the instruction and training programmes for
effectiveness. Where they determine that these programmes are ineffective, they should
make recommendations to the employer to improve their effectiveness.
3.5.5. Workers should participate and cooperate in exposure monitoring and health
surveillance programmes required by the competent authority and/or provided by the
employer for the protection of their health.
3.5.6. Workers and their representatives should participate in the process of
consultation and cooperate with employers concerning all aspects of safety in the
production of iron and steel specified in this code, and in particular as regards measures of
protection and prevention listed in 3.4.1 to 3.4.10.
3.5.7. Workers and their representatives should have the right to:
(i)
be consulted regarding any hazards or risks to safety and health from the production
of non-ferrous metals;
(ii) inquire into and receive information from the employer regarding any hazards or risks
to safety and health arising from the production of iron and steel, including
information from suppliers. This information should be provided in forms and
languages easily understood by the workers;
(iii) take adequate precautions, in cooperation with their employer, to protect themselves
and other workers against hazards or risks to safety and health from the production of
iron and steel; and
(iv) request, and be involved in, the assessment of hazards and risks to safety and health
from hazardous factors to be conducted by the employer and/or by the competent
authority. They should also have the right to be involved in relevant control measures
and investigations.
3.5.8. Workers and their representatives should be involved in the introduction and
development of workers health surveillance, and should participate and cooperate with
occupational health professionals, with their employers and with occupational health
professionals in its implementation.
3.5.9. Workers should be informed in a timely, objective and comprehensible
manner:
(i)
of the reasons for the examinations and investigations relating to the safety and health
hazards involved in their work;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
11
(i)
(ii) to appeal to the competent authority if they consider that the measures taken and the
means used by the employer are inadequate for the purpose of ensuring OSH at work;
(iii) to remove themselves from danger resulting from the production of iron and steel
when they have reasonable justification to believe that there is an imminent and
serious risk to their safety and health and that of other people. Such workers should
inform their supervisor and/or safety and health representative immediately.
(iv) in the case of a safety or health condition that places them at increased risk of harm,
to be transferred to alternative work not exposing them to that increased risk, if such
work is available and if the workers concerned have the qualifications or can
reasonably be trained for such alternative work;
(v) to receive adequate compensation if the case referred to in (iv) above results in loss of
employment;
(vi) to be provided with adequate medical treatment and compensation for occupational
injuries and diseases resulting from the production of iron and steel; and
(vii) to refrain from using or to shut down equipment or a process, or to refrain from using
a substance which can reasonably be expected to be hazardous, if the relevant
information is not available to assess the hazards or risks to safety and health.
3.5.11. Workers who remove themselves from danger in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph 3.5.10(iii) should be protected against undue consequences in
accordance with national conditions and practice.
3.5.12. Workers who justifiably take those actions specified in paragraph 3.5.10(i),
(ii) and (vii) should be protected from unwarranted discrimination, for which there should
be recourse in national laws and practice.
3.5.13. Workers and their elected safety and health representatives should receive
appropriate education and training and, where necessary, retraining in the most effective
methods available for minimizing risks to safety and health from the production of iron
and steel, in particular in those areas referred to in Chapters [7-15] of this code.
3.5.14. Women workers should have the right, in the case of pregnancy or when
breastfeeding, to alternative work not hazardous to the health of the unborn or nursing
child, where such work is available, in order to prevent exposure to hazards during the
production of iron and steel, and to return to their previous jobs at the appropriate time.
3.6.
12
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(ii) information concerning the hazards of machinery and equipment, the dangerous
properties of hazardous substances and physical agents or products;
(iii) instructions on how known hazards are to be avoided.
3.7.
ensure that on-site OSH procedures and arrangements are followed by the
contractor(s).
3.7.2. When using contractors, the commissioning party should ensure that:
(a) the same safety and training requirements apply to the contractors and their workers
as to the workers in the establishment;
(b) where required, only such contractors are used that have been duly registered or hold
licences;
(c) contracts specify safety and health requirements as well as sanctions and penalties in
case of non-compliance. Contracts should include the right for supervisors mandated
by the commissioning party to stop work whenever a risk of serious injury is apparent
and to suspend operations until the necessary remedies have been put in place;
(d) contractors who repeatedly violate their contractual obligations are excluded from
future bidding.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
13
4.
4.1.
Introduction
4.1.1. Numerous other principles contained in existing ILO instruments too lengthy
to reproduce in this text are relevant to OSH in the iron and steel industry. These address:
occupational safety and health management systems; reporting, recording and notification
of work-related injuries and diseases, ill health and incidents; and occupational health
services. The relevant instruments are listed and summarized in Annexes II, III and IV.
They may be updated from time to time and users of this code should check for updated
versions.
4.2.
4.3.
14
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
4.4.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
15
5.1.
(ii)
(iii)
unguarded machinery;
(iv)
falling objects;
(v)
engulfment;
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
exposure to asbestos;
(x)
(xi)
(xii)
skin contact with chemicals (irritants (acids, alkalis), solvents and sensitizers);
(xiii)
(xiv)
(xv)
extreme temperatures;
(xvi)
(xvii)
16
(xix)
(xx)
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(xxi)
(xxii)
ergonomics;
5.2.
Physical hazards
5.2.1. Noise
5.2.1.1. Hazard description
5.2.1.1.1. Exposure to noise levels exceeding those set by the competent authorities
may result in noise-induced hearing loss. Exposure to high noise levels may also interfere
with communication and may result in nervous fatigue with an increased risk of
occupational injury.
5.2.1.2. Assessment of risk
5.2.1.2.1. The level of noise and/or duration of exposure should not exceed the limits
established by the competent authority or by other recognized standards. The assessment
should, as appropriate, consider:
(a) the risk of hearing impairment;
(b) the degree of interference to communications essential for safety purposes; and
(c) the risk of nervous fatigue, with due consideration to the mental and physical
workload and other non-auditory hazards or effects.
5.2.1.2.2. In order to prevent adverse effects of noise on workers, employers should:
(a) identify the sources of noise and the tasks that give rise to exposure;
(b) seek the advice of the competent authority and/or the occupational health service
about exposure limits and other standards to be applied;
(c) seek the advice of the supplier of processes and equipment about expected noise
emission; and
(d) if this advice is incomplete or otherwise of doubtful value, arrange for measurements
by people who are competent to undertake these in accordance with current nationally
and/or internationally recognized standards and regulations.
5.2.1.2.3. Noise measurements should be used to:
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
17
(a) quantify the level and duration of exposure of workers and compare it with exposure
limits, as established by the competent authority or internationally recognized
standards to be applied (see also Annex IV, section 8);
(b) identify and characterize the sources of noise and the exposed workers;
(c) create a noise map for the determination of risk areas;
(d) assess the need both for engineering noise prevention and control, and for other
appropriate measures and their effective implementation; and
(e) evaluate the effectiveness of existing noise prevention and control measures.
5.2.1.3. Control strategies
5.2.1.3.1. General
5.2.1.3.1.1. Based on the assessment of the exposure to noise in the working
environment, the employer should establish a noise-prevention programme with the aim of
eliminating the hazard or risk, or reducing it to the lowest practicable level by all
appropriate means.
5.2.1.3.2. Workers health surveillance, training and information
5.2.1.3.2.1. Workers who may be exposed to noise levels exceeding occupational
standards should receive regular audiometric testing.
5.2.1.3.2.2. Employers should ensure that workers who may be exposed to significant
levels of noise are trained in:
(a) the effective use of hearing-protection devices;
(b) identifying and reporting on new or unusual sources of noise that they become aware
of; and
(c) the role of audiometric examination.
5.2.1.3.2.3. Employers should ensure that workers in noisy environments are
informed of:
(a) the results of their audiometric tests;
(b) the factors leading to noise-induced hearing loss and the consequences for the victim,
including non-auditory effects and social consequences, especially for young
workers;
(c) the precautions necessary, especially those requiring workers intervention or the use
of hearing-protection devices;
(d) the effects that a noisy environment may have on their general safety; and
(e) the symptoms of adverse effects of exposure to high levels of noise.
18
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
19
5.2.2. Vibration
5.2.2.1. Hazard description
5.2.2.1.1. Exposure of workers to hazardous vibration is mainly known as:
(a) whole-body vibration, when the body is supported on a surface that is vibrating,
which occurs in all forms of transport and when working near vibrating industrial
machinery; or
(b) hand-transmitted vibration, which enters the body through the hands and is caused by
various processes in which vibrating tools or work pieces are grasped or pushed by
the hands or fingers.
5.2.2.1.2. Exposure limits should be established according to current international
knowledge and data. Further detailed information can be found in Annex V, section 9.
5.2.2.2. Assessment of risk
5.2.2.2.1. If workers or others are frequently exposed to hand-transmitted or
whole-body vibration, and obvious steps do not eliminate the exposure, employers should
assess the hazard and risk to safety and health resulting from the conditions, and the
prevention and control measures to remove them or to reduce them to the lowest
practicable level by all appropriate means.
5.2.2.2.2. For the prevention of adverse effects of vibration on workers, employers
should:
(a) identify the sources of vibration and the tasks that give rise to exposure;
(b) seek the advice of the competent authority about exposure limits and other standards
to be applied;
(c) seek the advice of the supplier of vehicles and equipment about their vibration
emissions; or
(d) if this advice is incomplete or otherwise of doubtful value, arrange for measurements
by a technically capable person, to be carried out in accordance with recognized
standards and regulations and currently available knowledge.
5.2.2.2.3. Vibration measurements should be used to:
(a) quantify the level and duration of exposure of workers, and compare it with exposure
limits as established by the competent authority or other standards to be applied;
(b) identify and characterize the sources of vibration and the exposed workers;
(c) assess the need both for engineering vibration control and for other appropriate
measures, and for their effective implementation;
(d) evaluate the effectiveness of particular vibration-prevention and vibration-control
measures; and
(e) if possible, determine the resonance frequencies.
20
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
5.2.2.2.4. The assessment should identify the ways in which vibrating tools are used,
and determine in particular whether:
(a) the high-risk use of tools can be eliminated;
(b) workers have had sufficient training in the use of the tools; and
(c) the use of tools can be improved by supports.
5.2.2.2.5. With a view to establishing appropriate prevention and control measures,
the assessment should take into account:
(a) exposure to cold at the workplace, which can bring on symptoms of vibration white
finger (Raynauds phenomenon) in those exposed to vibration;
(b) vibration of the head or eyes, as well as vibration of the displays themselves, which
can affect the perception of displays; and
(c) body or limb vibration which can affect the manipulation of controls.
5.2.2.3. Control strategies
5.2.2.3.1. Training and information
5.2.2.3.1.1. Employers should ensure that workers who are exposed to significant
vibration hazards are:
(a) informed about the hazards and risks of prolonged use of vibrating tools;
(b) informed about the measures within the workers control which will minimize risk,
particularly the proper adjustment of seating and working positions;
(c) instructed in the correct handling and use of hand tools with a light but safe grip; and
(d) encouraged to report finger blanching, numbness or tingling, without unwarranted
discrimination, for which there should be recourse in national law and practice.
5.2.2.3.2. Isolation, substitution, engineering controls
5.2.2.3.2.1. Manufacturers should:
(a) provide vibration values for their tools;
(b) redesign processes to avoid the need to use vibrating tools;
(c) provide information to ensure that vibration is controlled by correct installation;
(d) avoid resonance frequencies of the component parts of machinery and equipment; and
(e) use, as far as practicable, anti-vibration handles.
5.2.2.3.2.2. When purchasing equipment and industrial vehicles, employers should
ascertain that the vibration exposure to the user is within prescribed national standards and
regulations.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
21
5.2.2.3.2.3. Where old machinery is still in use, sources of vibration that present a
risk to safety and health should be identified and suitable modifications made by
employing current knowledge of vibration-damping techniques.
5.2.2.3.2.4. Seating in vehicles, including static plant with integral seating, should be
designed to minimize transmission of vibration to the rider, and should permit an
ergonomically good working position.
5.2.2.3.2.5. Where workers are directly or indirectly exposed to vibration transmitted
via the floor or other structures, the vibrating machines should be mounted on vibration
isolators (anti-vibration mounts), installed according to the manufacturers instructions or
designed and manufactured according to internationally recognized plant and equipment
standards.
5.2.2.3.2.6. Machinery or vibrating tools should be maintained regularly because
worn components may increase vibration levels.
5.2.2.3.2.7. Where the exposure might lead to injury if workers continue work for a
longer period, and reduction of the vibration is impracticable, the work should be
rearranged to give rest periods or job rotation sufficient to reduce the overall exposure to a
safe level.
22
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(b) a hot environment that makes respiratory protectors uncomfortable and less likely to
be used, and necessitates restructuring of jobs in order to reduce the risks, for
example by:
(i)
minimizing exposure to the hazardous substances so that there is less need for
protective clothing;
(ii) changing the tasks so that the work pace is reduced in hot conditions; and
(iii) increasing the number of rest periods and job rotation.
5.2.3.2.4. In assessing the hazards and risks, employers should:
(a) make comparisons with other similar workplaces where measurements have been
made;
(b) where this is not practicable, arrange for measurements to be performed by a
technically capable person, using appropriate and properly calibrated equipment;
(c) seek the advice of the occupational health service or a competent body about
exposure standards to be applied (see also Annex V, section 7); and
(d) bear in mind that the quality of fine work done by hand is adversely affected by cold
temperatures.
5.2.3.3. Control strategies
5.2.3.3.1. Training and information
5.2.3.3.1.1. Workers exposed to heat or cold, as well as their supervisors, should be
trained:
(a) to recognize symptoms which may lead to heat stress or hypothermia, in themselves
or others, and the steps to be taken to prevent onset and/or emergencies;
(b) in the use of rescue and first-aid measures; and
(c) in action to be taken in the event of increased risks of accidents because of high or
low temperatures.
5.2.3.3.1.2. Workers should be advised of:
(a) the importance of physical fitness for work in hot or cold environments; and
(b) the importance of drinking sufficient quantities of suitable liquid and the dietary
requirements providing intake of salt and potassium and other elements that are
depleted due to sweating.
5.2.3.3.2. Isolation, substitution, engineering controls
5.2.3.3.2.1. When the assessment reveals that the workers may be at risk of heat
stress or hypothermia, employers should, if practicable, eliminate the need for work in
such conditions or, if this is not feasible, take measures to reduce the risks from extreme
temperatures.
5.2.3.3.2.2. Where workers are at risk from exposure to radiant heat by working near
hot surfaces:
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
23
(a) the employer may increase the distance between the equipment (taking care not to do
so to the detriment of other workplaces) and the exposed workers;
(b) when this is not practicable, the employer should reduce the temperature of the
surface by changing plant-operating temperatures, insulating the surfaces or reducing
the emissivity of the surface.
5.2.3.3.2.3. Where the reduction of surface temperature is not practicable, employers
should consider:
(a) the use of radiation barriers (of low conductivity and high emissivity) between the
surface and the workplace, and maintain them in a clean state;
(b) water-cooling the hot surfaces, where practicable;
(c) the use of portable reflective shielding; or
(d) arranging for remote control operations.
5.2.3.3.2.4. Where the assessment shows that unhealthy or uncomfortable conditions
arise from increased air temperature, the employer should implement means to reduce air
temperature, which may include ventilation or air cooling.
5.2.3.3.2.5. Employers should take particular care with ventilation design where
work is undertaken in enclosed spaces or areas. When fail-safe systems are not in
operation, there should be adequate supervision of workers at risk to ensure that they can
be removed from danger.
5.2.3.3.2.6. Where part of the risk arises from the metabolic heat produced during
work, and other methods of eliminating the risk are impracticable, employers should
arrange a work-rest cycle for exposed workers, either in the workplace or in a cooler
restroom. The rest periods should be as prescribed by the competent authority and
sufficient to allow the worker to recover (see Annex V, paragraph 7.2). Employers should
ensure that appropriate mechanical aids are available to reduce workloads and that tasks
performed in hot environments are well designed ergonomically to minimize physical
stress.
5.2.3.3.2.7. Where other methods of controlling thermal risk, including a work-rest
regime, are not practicable, employers should provide protective clothing. In the selection
of protective clothing, consideration may be given to the following:
(a) reflective clothing where heat gain is mostly by radiation;
(b) insulated clothing with reflective surfaces during simultaneous exposure to high
radiant heat and hot air (allowing freedom of movement to perform tasks); or
(c) air-, water- or ice-cooled clothing in other instances as a possible complement to (a)
and (b) above.
5.2.3.3.2.8. Where failure of the protective clothing could expose the worker to
extremes of temperature, the clothing should be carefully selected and its use monitored by
a technically capable person, taking account of the environmental conditions. A system
should be installed to ensure that any failure of the cooling system is immediately detected
and the worker removed from the environment.
5.2.3.3.2.9. For hydration maintenance, employers should make available sufficient
quantities of drinking water, with the proper electrolytes, where appropriate.
24
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
5.2.3.3.2.10. Where a residual risk of heat stress remains even after all the control
measures have been taken, workers should be adequately supervised so that they can be
withdrawn from the hot conditions if symptoms occur. Employers should ensure that firstaid facilities, and staff trained in the use of such facilities, are available.
5.2.3.3.2.11. Extra care should be taken when workers are required to move from a
very hot working environment to a much colder one, especially when exposed to strong
wind, as the wind-chill factor can result in exposed flesh cooling very rapidly.
5.2.3.3.2.12. Workers should be protected against the severest forms of cold stress,
hypothermia and cold injury.
5.2.3.3.2.13. The core body temperature should not be allowed to fall below 36C
(96.8F). Suitable protection should be provided to prevent injury to bodily extremities.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
25
26
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(b) ELs for visible light be in terms of the radiance of the source, i.e. the energy output
per unit area of the source into each solid angle, weighted according to the
wavelength of the radiation; and
(c) ELs for IR radiation be in terms of the radiant flux density at the eye, in mW/cm2, and
unweighted for wavelength. However, for IR heat lamps there is also a limit in terms
of the sources radiance.
5.2.5.2.2. The Guidelines on protection against non-ionizing radiation (Fonteny-auxRoses, France, International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA), 1991) include ELs
for lasers to protect the eye and skin. They are generally in terms of the energy density
reaching the eye or skin (that is, in J/m2, equal to the radiant flux density in W/m2
multiplied by the exposure time in seconds). The ELs vary with wavelength, and for
visible and IR wavelengths are relaxed slightly as exposure time increases. Guidance on
their use and further references on limits of exposure to laser radiation are given in the
practical guide, The use of lasers in the workplace, Occupational Safety and Health Series,
No. 68 (Geneva, ILO, 1993). Control measures, however, are more easily specified in
terms of the class of laser used than in terms of the ELs. The laser classification is
specified in IEC 60 825-1: Safety of laser products Part 1: Equipment classification,
requirements and users guide (Geneva, International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC),
1993).
5.2.5.2.3. Electrical and magnetic fields are found around all equipment that passes
an electric current. Static charges are created around a fixed charge, such as a visual
display unit screen, or a fixed magnetic field.
5.2.5.2.4. Some studies have shown that exposure to magnetic fields can cause
certain types of cancers and brain tumours. They can also affect a persons mood,
alertness, heart function, and the immune and reproductive systems; some individuals
suffer from skin irritation in the presence of electrical fields. Workers who rely on
pacemakers should not be employed in areas where they may be exposed to magnetic
fields, based on a risk assessment.
5.2.5.2.5. Unlike electric fields, magnetic fields cannot be easily screened off, as they
can pass through all materials. However, the power of the field rapidly diminishes as the
distance from the source of the magnetic field increases. Consequently, where risk
assessment indicates that it involves an unacceptable risk, it is advisable to shut down all
electrical equipment when not in use. Fixed installations which generate high-strength
fields, such as transformers and switching stations, should be sited as far away from
workstations as possible. Encapsulating the source using an alloy that is a good magnetic
conductor can also reduce the effects of strong magnetic fields, as can shielding the
workstation with a suitably absorbent material such as aluminium that has been welded
into a continuous or single sheet.
5.2.5.2.6. Employers should identify all the sources and potential risk of exposure by
mapping the field strength in the workplace.
5.3.
Chemical hazards
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
27
substances may present a hazard as the result of contact with the body or absorption into
the body. Absorption can occur through the skin, by ingestion or by inhalation.
5.3.1.1.2. Chemicals can have acute (short-term) and/or chronic (long-term) health
effects.
5.3.1.1.3. Chemicals may present a safety hazard as a result of their chemical and
physical properties.
5.3.1.2. Assessment of risk
5.3.1.2.1. Workers may be exposed to chemicals in production work by addition to
the process, as well as to chemicals generated by the process or used in maintenance
activities, and to chemicals actively during their use in laboratory work.
5.3.1.2.2. Exposure may occur passively due to the presence of chemicals in the
workplace environment.
5.3.1.2.3. The advice of the competent authority and workers representatives should
be sought regarding exposure limits and other standards to be applied.
5.3.1.2.4. Material safety data sheets that include advice on the safe handling of any
chemical to ensure adequate prevention and protection should be readily available. All
those concerned with the storage and handling of chemicals, and with general
housekeeping, should be trained and should adopt safe systems of work at all times. The
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) (United
Nations, 2003) provides guidance on the preparation of labels, material safety data sheets
and the provision of information to workers.
5.3.1.2.5. The production of material safety data sheets in electronic format should be
encouraged. Chemical safety data sheets should, as a minimum, meet the requirements of
the competent authority and are recommended to contain the following core information:
(a) identification of manufacturer, product and ingredients;
(b) physical and chemical properties, and information on the health effects, physical
hazards, environmental impact and relevant exposure limits; and
(c) recommendations concerning safe work practices; transport, storage and handling;
waste disposal; protective clothing and PPE; first aid, fire-fighting and chemical
spills.
5.3.1.2.6. Labels should, as a minimum, meet the requirements of the competent
authority, and are recommended to contain the following core information:
(a) signal word or symbol; identification information, including the manufacturer,
product and ingredients;
(b) risks and safety phrases, first-aid and disposal procedures; and
(c) reference to the material safety data sheets, and date of issue.
5.3.1.2.7. The ILO code of practice Safety in the use of chemicals at work (Geneva,
1993) provides comprehensive guidance on the above issues for chemicals and their use.
5.3.1.2.8. For further information on chemical hazards, see Annex VI.
28
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
Further specific information and recommendations for different gases and other compounds can
be found in Annex VI.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
29
harmful agents that are inhaled through the lungs can cause target organ damage and/or
systemic toxic effects. Certain asphyxiants can cause death in a matter of seconds at high
concentrations by displacing oxygen.
5.3.2.1.3. Specific agents that may be found in the iron and steel industry include
heavy metals (e.g. lead, chromium, zinc, nickel and manganese) in the form of fumes,
particulates and adsorbates on inert dust particles. Acid mists from pickling areas can
cause skin, eye and respiratory irritation. For further information, see sections 5.3.3 and
5.3.4 for a detailed review of asbestos and insulation wool, respectively. It is important to
consider the solubility of metals and their compounds when addressing risk.
5.3.2.2. Assessment of risk
5.3.2.2.1. The assessment of risk should begin with a review of production and
maintenance processes in order to understand the content, form and volume of inhalable
agents associated with the production of iron and steel, including intermediates, byproducts and waste. This should include information acquired from suppliers for materials
brought on site through the use of material safety data sheets (see section 5.3.1.2).
5.3.2.2.2. The potential for exposure should be assessed according to the provisions
of the ILO codes of practice Safety in the use of chemicals at work and Ambient factors in
the workplace, or another protocol of equal or greater value, such as the application of an
exposure assessment protocol from a competent authority.
5.3.2.2.3. Exposure assessment activities should be conducted by competent persons.
5.3.2.2.4. Employers should provide information to workers and their representatives
regarding the risk assessment process, and inform them of the results of risk assessments.
5.3.2.2.5. When necessary, employers should seek the advice of the competent
authority about exposure limits relating to inhalable agents.
5.3.2.3. Control strategies
5.3.2.3.1. Training and information
5.3.2.3.1.1. Workers and their representatives should be made aware of the
toxicological properties, technical means of prevention, safe working procedures,
protective equipment and emergency procedures necessary to eliminate exposure. Where it
is not possible, exposure to harmful inhalable agents with which they work or may come in
contact should be minimized.
5.3.2.3.1.2. Training should be provided in advance of the work, including
production or maintenance process changes that result in the use or generation of different
inhalable agents.
5.3.2.3.1.3. Training should specify special precautions to be taken for workers who
perform work in confined spaces that might contain harmful inhalable agents. See section
5.4.1 for additional information on safe work practices involving confined spaces.
5.3.2.3.2. Isolation, substitution, engineering controls
5.3.2.3.2.1. Employers should develop and implement engineering controls for
harmful inhalable agents. Such controls include, but are not limited to: the substitution of
more harmful agents by less harmful agents; isolating processes that generate such
airborne contaminants; and the use of local and general ventilation systems.
30
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
5.3.2.3.2.2. See the ILO codes of practice Safety in the use of chemicals at work and
Ambient factors in the workplace for additional direction in the development and
implementation of engineering controls.
5.3.2.3.3. Work practices and procedural controls
5.3.2.3.3.1. When engineering controls are not feasible or sufficiently effective to
ensure that exposure to inhalable agents is maintained at or below exposure limits, work
practices and procedural controls should be applied. These might include, but are not
limited to: altering temperature, pressure and other process settings; and minimizing the
length of time that workers are potentially exposed to inhalable agents.
5.3.2.3.3.2. See the ILO codes of practice Safety in the use of chemicals at work and
Ambient factors in the workplace for additional direction in the development and
implementation of engineering controls.
5.3.3. Asbestos
5.3.3.1. Hazard description
5.3.3.1.1. Exposure to asbestos may cause diseases of the respiratory and digestive
tracts, through inhalation or ingestion, and may cause secondary disease in a number of
vital organs.
5.3.3.1.2. The effects of exposure to asbestos may not become apparent for two or
three decades, or even longer. However, the diseases caused by exposure to these
substances, such as asbestosis and mesothelioma, once diagnosed are irreversible,
disabling and frequently fatal.
5.3.3.2. Assessment of risk
5.3.3.2.1. If a worker could be exposed to asbestos, the employer should develop and
implement an exposure control plan.
5.3.3.2.2. The employer should ensure that the administration of this plan is
undertaken by a competent person in accordance with the requirements of the competent
authority.
5.3.3.2.3. The employer should ensure that an inventory of all known asbestoscontaining materials at the facility is prepared and kept current, and that these materials are
identified by signs, labels or, when this is not practicable, other effective means. Where the
presence of asbestos is not known, the material should be tested before it is touched.
5.3.3.2.4. The employer should ensure that a risk assessment on asbestos-containing
material identified in the inventory is conducted by a competent person. Regard should be
given to the condition of the material, its friability, accessibility, and likelihood of damage,
and the potential for fibre release and exposure of workers.
5.3.3.3. Control strategies
5.3.3.3.1. The employer should ensure that asbestos-containing material is controlled
by removal, enclosure or encapsulation, to prevent the release of asbestos fibre.
5.3.3.3.2. The employer should not allow any work that would disturb asbestoscontaining material, unless necessary precautions have been taken to protect workers.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
31
5.3.3.3.3. If a worker may be exposed to asbestos, the employer should ensure that:
(a) a survey is conducted to assess the potential for exposure;
(b) if the survey reveals that workers may be at risk of exposure to asbestos, air sampling
is conducted to assess the potential for exposure;
(c) workplace exposure monitoring and assessment are conducted using occupational
hygiene methods and in laboratories that are acceptable to the competent authority;
(d) the results of the monitoring and assessment, or a summary of the results, are
provided to the workers and their representatives without undue delay; and
(e) workers exposed to asbestos are given periodic medical examinations.
5.3.3.3.4. The employer should retain all records of asbestos-containing materials
inventories and risk assessments, inspections, and air monitoring results.
5.3.3.3.5. Training and information
5.3.3.3.5.1. The employer should ensure that any worker who may be at risk of
exposure is adequately instructed and trained in:
(a) the hazards of asbestos;
(b) the means of identifying asbestos-containing material;
(c) the work procedures to be followed, which should be approved by the competent
authority, and provided to the workers and their representatives in written or other
suitable form;
(d) the correct use of the operation of engineering controls and PPE; and
(e) the purpose and significance of any required health monitoring.
5.3.3.3.6. Isolation, substitution, engineering controls
5.3.3.3.6.1. The employer should ensure that procedures for handling or using
asbestos-containing material prevent or minimize the release of asbestos fibres. The
procedures should address:
(a) the containment of asbestos;
(b) the control of the release of asbestos, particularly sweeping, grinding and blowing
material that is known to contain asbestos;
(c) the provision, use and maintenance of PPE and clothing;
(d) means of decontamination of workers; and
(e) the removal of asbestos waste and clean-up of asbestos waste material.
5.3.3.3.6.2. The procedures should provide the workers with task-specific work
direction that addresses hazards and necessary controls.
5.3.3.3.6.3. Asbestos should not be used where it is banned by law or regulation. In
countries where asbestos is allowed the employer should, nonetheless, substitute asbestos
by less hazardous materials. If such substitution is not practicable, the employer should
32
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
document the reasons why substitution cannot be made and make this documentation
available to the workers, their representatives and the competent authority.
5.3.3.3.6.4. The employer should establish and ventilate containment areas where
asbestos may be present, so that:
(a) air flows only from clean outside areas into the contaminated area; and
(b) exhaust air from the contaminated area is directed through a high-efficiency
particulate air (HEPA) filter.
5.3.3.3.6.5. The employer should provide local exhaust ventilation with exhaust air
discharge through a HEPA filter for all dust-producing activities outside containment areas
where asbestos-containing dust is present.
5.3.3.3.6.6. Asbestos-containing material that is to be disturbed should be effectively
wetted before and during the work, whenever practicable.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
33
34
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(b)
are least likely to result in the generation of fibres and dust because of their intrinsic
properties, method of use, and pre-supply preparation.
5.3.4.4.13. Building clients, designers and specifiers should ensure that all
requirements of the competent authority are included in specification and tender
documents. They should maintain records of the location and type of insulation used so as
to provide the necessary information to those who may have potential for exposure in the
future.
5.3.4.4.14. Building clients and main contractors should always give preference to
contracting insulation firms which conform to the requirements of the competent authority.
5.4.
Safety hazards
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
35
36
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
precautions should include clothing, tools, lighting, smoking materials and electrical
apparatus.
5.4.1.3.3.6. Where a potential for a flammable/combustible atmosphere exists, only
certified non-sparking electrical apparatus and fixtures should be used.
5.4.1.3.3.7. An appropriate system, including tags and locks, should be used to
ensure that no personnel enter a confined space without authorization, and that no
personnel or equipment remain in the confined space before any openings are resealed or
power and process piping reconnected.
5.4.1.3.3.8. Employers should develop and ensure implementation of emergency
procedures, including provision for prompt rescue from the hazardous confined space, to
address any foreseeable accidents.
5.4.1.3.3.9. Workers in the hazardous confined space should be closely monitored by
personnel outside the space to ensure that safe entry conditions are maintained. Such
personnel should have the training and equipment to effect a safe rescue or to initiate a
prompt and safe rescue by others.
5.4.1.3.4. Personal protective equipment and respirators
5.4.1.3.4.1. Employers should provide workers entering a confined space with
appropriate respirators and other PPE to control hazards in the confined space, and training
on PPE use in confined spaces.
verification of isolation;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
37
(j)
38
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(e) failure to provide the right information, instruction and training for those using the
equipment;
(f)
hammers with broken or cracked handles, chisels and punches with mushroom heads,
bent or broken wrenches and wrenches with sprung jaws should not be used by
employees;
(g) most hand-held electrical power tools should be equipped with a dead man or
quick release control, so that the power is automatically shut off wherever the
operator releases the control;
(h) all hand-held portable electrical equipment should have its frame earthed or be doubly
insulated and identified as such;
(i)
all power tools should be used with appropriate shields, guards and attachments and
in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturers. Workers should be
trained in the use of power tools and safety requirements;
(j)
pneumatic power tools should be positively secured to the hose to prevent the tool
from becoming disconnected; also, a tool retainer should be used on tools to prevent
the attachment from being disconnected;
(k) nailers, staplers, and similar equipment with automatic feed should have a muzzle to
prevent the tool from ejecting material unless the muzzle is in contact with the work
surface.
5.4.3.1.2. Industrial robots present special hazards, in that they may move in
unanticipated ways owing to complex or faulty programming.
5.4.3.2. Role of employer
5.4.3.2.1. Controlling risks often means guarding those parts of machines and
equipment that could cause injury. Many accidents happen because of the failure to select
the right equipment for the work to be done. Planning ahead can control risks and ensure
that suitably protected equipment or machinery is available. Moreover, there are many
machines, parts of machines or parts of work equipment which if not properly guarded can
cause injury to the operator. The objective is to make sure that machines are made safe by
eliminating sources of harm. However, this is not always possible; therefore, risks have to
be controlled.
5.4.3.2.2. Employers should ensure that:
(a) fixed guards should be used wherever necessary, and properly fastened in place with
appropriate fasteners including, but not limited to, screws or nuts and bolts which
need tools to remove them;
(b) if workers need regular access to parts of the machine and a fixed guard is not
possible, an interlocked guard should be used. This will ensure that the machine
cannot start before the guard is closed and will stop if the guard is opened while the
machine is operating. If access is required to parts that are guarded, the machinery
should be shut down;
(c) they should establish systems for inspection to ensure that guards are properly
maintained and defects are rectified; and
(d) workers should be trained to operate equipment before they are directed to do so.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
39
40
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
41
42
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
5.5.
Ergonomics
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
43
5.5.3.2. To the extent possible, the task should be adapted to the worker, and jobs and
tasks with unacceptable ergonomic problems should be eliminated by redesigning work
procedures, work stations, tools and machinery.
5.5.3.3. If complete elimination is not practicable, the time that workers are required
to spend in such conditions should be as short as possible. The workload may be brought to
a tolerable level with sufficient rest periods and job rotation. Changes in posture should be
possible.
5.5.3.4. Workers should be trained in using correct work techniques.
5.5.3.5. Workers should be informed about the hazards related to physical work,
work postures, repetitive movements and lifting and carrying loads.
44
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
6.
6.1.
Hazard description
6.1.1. Most coke is produced from coal. The coal is charged into an oven, which is
then sealed. A by product coke battery contains twenty or more tall, wide and narrow
ovens, arranged side by side like slices in a loaf of bread. After charging, a coke oven is
heated for 12 hours or more, during which time a variety of volatile chemicals are driven
off. In a by-product battery, these chemicals are collected and refined into a wide range of
products. The remaining coke oven gas is used as a fuel. In a non-recovery battery, the
ovens are typically low, broad structures, and the chemicals are burned in the headspace
above the coke or in the flues which heat the oven. Some new systems are under
development, but most involve similar hazards. Coke can also be produced from
petroleum.
6.1.2. Most health hazards in coke production arise from the volatile chemicals
driven off the coal during coking. Coke oven emissions contain cancer-causing
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, along with toxic gases and vapours such as benzene,
hydrogen sulphide, carbon monoxide and ammonia. Workers in the coal preparation plant
are exposed to coal dust, which can cause lung damage. Coke ovens must be kept hot to
maintain their structural integrity, so production and maintenance operations pose the risk
of heat stress.
6.1.3. Safety hazards in coke production include mobile equipment, burns, fire and
explosion. Coke batteries are served by large tracked mobile equipment, including larry
cars used in charging, pusher machines used to remove the coke, and door machines used
to remove the oven doors when the coke is ready to be pushed. Visibility can be poor if
emissions are badly controlled, especially if the coke side, where hot coke is extracted, is
under a shed. Workers can suffer severe burns if they come into contact with hot coke,
doors or jambs, or if they step through a loose charging lid on the top of the battery. Coke
oven gas is flammable and explosive, as are many of the chemicals collected in by-product
plants.
6.2.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
45
6.3.
46
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(c) Where necessary, the stacks or flues of non-recovery batteries should be equipped
with desulphurization systems and systems for the collection of heavy metals and
dust.
6.4.
6.5.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
47
7.
7.1.
General
7.1.1. The iron and steel industry uses a range of furnaces. For iron-making
operations, the essential feature is the blast furnace. For steel-making operations, there are
three types of furnaces: the open-hearth furnace, the basic-oxygen process converter and
the electric arc furnace.
7.1.2. Furnaces may cause glare that can injure the eyes unless suitable eye
protection is provided and worn. Manual operations, such as furnace bricklaying, and
hand-arm vibration from using pneumatic tools and grinders may cause ergonomic
problems.
7.1.3. Only authorized persons should be allowed near furnaces.
7.1.4. There should be suitable and sufficient general and local exhaust ventilation
with dust- and fume-collecting devices incorporated into the design of the exhaust
ventilation systems.
7.1.5. The effectiveness and adequacy of general and local exhaust-ventilation
systems to remove fumes and gases from the furnace area should be tested regularly.
Collection bags for dusts should be replaced when indicated.
7.1.6. Ultraviolet (UV) and/or infrared light-resistant goggles or face shields should
be provided where there is a requirement for the authorized visual inspection of furnaces.
7.1.7. Continuous detectors should be installed to provide early warning of raised
levels of dangerous gases.
7.1.8. Positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus should be available to
enable rapid rescue in the event of a build-up of dangerous gases. The breathing apparatus
should be checked and maintained regularly, and should only be used by people who have
been trained to do so.
7.1.9. People working in and around the furnace and oven areas should be provided
with suitable PPE to protect them against molten metal burns, noise, and physical and
chemical hazards (see also Chapter 5). PPE should be to molten metal standard for casters
and others exposed to molten metal. Specific PPE should include, but not be limited to:
(a) molten metal resistant jackets and trousers;
(b) face shields or vented goggles;
(c) molten metal resistant gloves;
(d) safety footwear insulated against heat;
(e) respiratory protective equipment;
(f)
protective helmets;
48
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
7.2.
7.3.
Lighting furnaces
7.3.1. Before a furnace is lit, fittings and appliances should be inspected to ensure
that they are in working order. Particular attention should be paid to the furnace control
settings, the air supply, the emission stacks, the fuel supply and its associated pipe work.
7.3.2. Hand-held torches used to light small furnaces should have a handle of
adequate length, and the operator should use a suitable protective shield and heat-insulated
gloves to prevent possible burns.
7.3.3. A slight draught should be allowed via the air supply to support ignition when
the fuel has been switched on and the flame applied.
7.3.4. People responsible for operating the furnace should keep a close watch on the
fuel supply, on the possible escape of fuel and on continuing ignition.
7.4.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
49
7.5.
7.6.
7.7.
50
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
51
52
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
8.
Surface preparation
8.1.
Hazard description
8.1.1. Various methods are used to remove defects, scale, oxides, and other
impurities from the surface of steel at different points in the process. These include:
(a) scarfing, which uses fixed or hand-held torches or lances to burn away the impurities;
(b) surface grinding;
(c) degreasing, which uses detergents or solvents to remove grease; and
(d) pickling, which uses acids or hydrogen peroxide to dissolve scale and oxides.
8.1.2. Each of these operations has its own hazards. Scarfing may expose workers to
metal fumes and dust, noise, and burns from scarfing lances. Alloying agents in the steel
may increase the hazard of the fumes or dust. Surface grinding also generates dust, and
involves machinery hazards. Degreasing solvents may be toxic. Acids can cause acid
burns. Degreasing and pickling of steel sheet and strip involves large tanks with coiling
machinery at each end. The coiling machinery has many nip points which need to be riskassessed.
8.2.
Hazard control
8.2.1. Scarfing and surface grinding should be done in enclosures, with good exhaust
ventilation. Workers should be provided with respiratory protection where the ventilation
does not reduce exposure to levels below the appropriate exposure limits. Where
necessary, workers involved in scarfing should be provided with hearing protection.
8.2.2. Workers who handle pickling acids or hydrogen peroxide should be provided
with acid or chemical-resistant clothing, goggles and face shields, footwear and leggings,
and respiratory protection where necessary. Hydrofluoric acid should be handled with
extreme care, since it can cause severe poisoning in addition to acid burns.
8.2.3. To the extent practicable, acid pickling tanks and solvent degreasing tanks
should be covered, and provided with exhaust ventilation to control the vapours.
8.2.4. Care should be taken to prevent the inadvertent mixing of acids with hydrogen
peroxide or solvents. Acids should not be stored next to solvents or hydrogen peroxide.
8.2.5. Appropriate machine guarding should be provided for coiling apparatus and
other equipment used in surface preparation operations.
8.2.6. Metallic residues from surface preparation should be recycled or disposed of in
a manner that minimizes exposure to dust.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
53
9.
9.1.
General
9.1.1. Many of the specific hazards found in iron and steel making are also found in
foundries. These include:
!
lighting furnaces;
carbon monoxide;
steam explosions;
handling molten metal, dross and slag (see section 7.7 for more details).
9.1.2. Each furnace should have operating instructions giving data about operation,
maintenance, possible faults and actions to be taken in the event of faults. The employer
should ensure that operators are aware of the contents of these instructions.
9.1.3. The danger arising from the presence of hot metal is common to most
foundries. Hazards may also be specific to particular foundry processes. For example, the
use of magnesium presents flare risks not encountered in other metal-founding industries.
9.2.
54
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
9.2.8. Ladles and other equipment used on molten metal should be dry and, ideally,
preheated before use.
9.2.9. Stopper-operating mechanisms on bottom-pouring ladles should be secured
prior to transport to ensure they do not accidentally operate while in motion.
9.4.
Tapping
9.4.1. Workers tapping cupolas should observe rigorous personal protection
measures. Eye protection and protective clothing are essential.
9.4.2. Tappers and supervisors should ensure that any person not involved in the
operation of the cupola remains outside the defined danger area.
9.5.
Bottom drop
9.5.1. Dropping the cupola bottom is a dangerous operation that requires skilled and
trained workers and appropriate supervision.
9.5.2. A refractory floor or layer of dry sand on which to drop the debris is essential.
9.6.
Protective equipment
9.6.1. Workers in metal and pouring sections of the foundry should be provided with
appropriate PPE, such as hard hats, tinted eye protection and face shields, and aluminized
clothing such as aprons, gaiters or spats and boots.
9.6.2. In delineated areas, the use of protective equipment should be mandatory, and
there should be adequate instruction in its use and maintenance.
9.6.3. A readily available eyewash fountain should be located in any foundry area
where sodium silicate is used.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
55
9.7.
9.8.
Abrasive blasting
9.8.1. Abrasive blasting should always be carried out in an isolated, enclosed space.
9.8.2. All abrasive blasting enclosures should be inspected at regular intervals to
ensure that the dust extraction system is functioning and that there are no leaks through
which shot or water could escape into the foundry.
9.8.3. It is advisable to post a notice on the door to the booth, warning employees that
abrasive blasting is under way and that unauthorized entry is prohibited.
9.8.4. Silica, sand and other toxic materials should not be used.
9.9.
Abrasive wheels
9.9.1. All dangerous parts of machinery should have adequate guarding, with
automatic lockout if the guard is removed during processing.
9.9.2. Dangerous gaps between the wheel and the rest at pedestal grinders should be
eliminated, and close attention should be paid to all precautions in the care and
maintenance of abrasive wheels and the regulation of their speed.
9.9.3. Strict maintenance of all electrical equipment and proper grounding
arrangements should be enforced.
56
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
9.10.3. Core making. Where a central design or opening is required in the moulded
item, cores made of refractory materials are incorporated into the mould. The refractory
materials often consist of synthetic fibres, which are skin irritants. Carbon dioxide and
sulphur dioxide are often given off from binders during the core-making process.
9.10.4. Shell moulding. Resin-bonded sand is used to produce moulds. These
phenol- or formaldehyde-based resins are a hazard if they are inhaled, ingested or come
into contact with the skin. The individual characteristics of the chemical binder should be
obtained from the supplier, who should advise on precautions for general use, handling and
storage.
9.10.5. Hot-box moulding. Workers are at risk from exposure to a number of agents
that are hazardous to health, including phenol-formaldehyde, urea-formaldehyde, furfuryl
alcohol-urea, formaldehyde, ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, benzene and toluene.
9.10.6. Cold-box or no-bake moulding. Core-box heating is avoided by the use of
sand-resin catalyst systems that cure at room temperature, or urethane systems that use a
gas catalyst. The potentially hazardous by-products of these catalysts include ureaformaldehyde, furfuryl alcohol-urea, formaldehyde, phosphoric acid, sulphuric acids,
phenol-formaldehyde and isocyanate.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
57
10.
Rolling mills
58
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
10.2.4. Attention should be paid to the hazard of cuts to workers in strip- and sheetrolling mills.
10.2.5. An adequate number of bridges with appropriate guardrails should be
installed and their use enforced.
10.2.6. Gratings, absorbent materials and boots with slip-resistant soles should be
provided, in addition to regular cleaning of the floor to prevent slips, trips and falls.
10.2.7. Good planning often reduces the number of roll changes required. The change
of heavy rollers in the stands should not be done with time pressure and without suitable
tools.
10.2.8. Water-based rolling oils, lubricants and coolants should be replaced on a
regular basis in order to avoid bacterial contamination. Where biocides are used for this
purpose, they should not be toxic to workers, either in themselves or in combination with
other ingredients.
10.2.9. Operating pulpits should be ergonomically designed.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
59
11.
Coating lines
60
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
11.3.8. All chemicals should be evaluated for potential toxicity and physical hazards,
and less hazardous materials should be substituted where possible.
11.3.9. Metal coating processes that generate hazardous contaminants may require
local exhaust ventilation that is strategically placed to draw the contaminants away from
the worker. Fresh-air intakes should be located away from exhaust vents so that potentially
toxic gases are not recirculated.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
61
12.
Heat treating
62
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
13.
Internal transport
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
63
13.2.2.8. Vehicles should be equipped with ventilated cabins to protect workers from
hazardous materials.
13.2.2.9. Vehicles should be kept clean and tidy, and operators should report critical
faults and deficiencies immediately to the employer.
13.2.2.10. Forklift controls should be designed to stop if released.
13.2.2.11. Forklift trucks used to transport molten material should have solid tyres
and their fuel tanks should be protected and insulated from ignition. The drivers station
should have rigid splashguards fitted.
13.2.2.12. Lifting devices should be made of steel that is not prone to hydrogen
embrittlement and should be shielded from radiant heat.
13.2.2.13. Workstations should not be located underneath the path of molten
material.
13.2.2.14. With regard to overhead ladles, no fixtures that might cause spillage en
route should be within a short distance (approximately 50 cm) of their external limit of
travel.
13.2.2.15. The operator of a vehicle should perform a check on the vehicle at the start
of each shift, and a record should be kept.
13.2.2.16. Vehicles should not be moved unless the operator has a clear field of view
in the direction of travel, to the rear, above and to either side, or is in communication with
another person who does.
13.2.2.17. Rail stops or other blocking devices should be used to protect workers
required to perform work on tracks or in vehicle travel areas.
64
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
14.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
65
15.
15.1. General
15.1.1. The necessary OSH competence requirements should be defined by the
employer based on the provisions of the national laws or regulations, in consultation with
workers and their representatives, and appropriate training arrangements established and
maintained to ensure that all persons are competent to perform the OSH aspects of their
present or planned duties and responsibilities.
15.1.2. Employers should have, or should have access to, sufficient OSH competence
to identify and eliminate or control work-related hazards and risks, and to implement the
OSH management system. Specific training needs can be identified from the initial and
ongoing hazard identification, risk assessment and evaluation of control measures.
15.1.3. Training programmes should:
(a) cover all workers at the facility, including contractors, as appropriate;
(b) be conducted by competent persons;
(c) provide effective and timely initial and refresher training at appropriate intervals, in a
manner and language understood by the workers;
(d) include participant evaluation for comprehension and retention of the training;
(e) be reviewed periodically by the safety and health committee, where it exists or by the
employer in consultation with workers and their representatives, and modified as
necessary;
(f)
be documented.
15.1.4. The form and the content of training, particularly for new workers, should be
devised and implemented in consultation with workers or their representatives, and should
be in accordance with the identified needs, and may include:
(a) pertinent aspects of OSH legislation and any collective agreement, such as the rights,
responsibilities and duties of competent authorities, employers, contractors and
workers;
(b) assessments, reviews and exposure measurements, and the rights and duties of
workers in this regard;
(c) the role of health surveillance, the rights and duties of workers in this regard, and
access to information;
(d) instructions on PPE as may be necessary, its significance, correct use and limitations,
and in particular on factors which may show inadequacy or malfunction of the
equipment, and the measures which may be required for the workers to protect
themselves;
(e) the nature and degree of hazards or risks to safety and health which may occur,
including any factors which may influence that risk, such as appropriate hygiene
practices;
66
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(f)
safe operating procedures such as, for example, confined spaces and isolation of
hazardous energy;
correct methods for the handling of substances, the operation of processes and
equipment, and for storage, transport and waste disposal;
(j)
(k) hazard warning signs and symbols for hazardous ambient factors which may occur;
(l)
emergency measures, fire fighting and fire prevention, and first aid;
(m) appropriate hygiene practices to prevent, for example, the transmission of hazardous
substances off site;
(n) cleaning, maintenance, storage and waste disposal, to the extent that these may cause
exposure for the workers concerned.
15.1.5. Training should be provided to all participants at no cost and should take
place during working hours. If this is not possible, the timing and other arrangements
should be agreed upon between the employer and workers representatives.
15.1.6. Employers should ensure that training and information requirements and
procedures are kept under review, as part of the assessment review and documentation.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
67
68
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
16.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
69
16.1.13. Before reissuing the clothing or equipment, employers should provide for
the laundering, cleaning, disinfecting and examination of protective clothing or equipment
which has been used and may be contaminated by materials that are hazardous to health.
16.1.14. Protective equipment that may be contaminated by materials hazardous to
health should not be laundered, cleaned or kept at workers homes. Employers should
ensure that workers do not take contaminated clothing home and should provide for the
cleaning of such clothing at no cost to the worker.
16.1.15. PPE should not contain hazardous substances, such as asbestos.
70
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
16.3.6. The protectors should be fitted and adjusted by a person who has received
training in this task.
16.3.7. Comfort is particularly important in helmet and hood type protectors as they
may become almost intolerably hot during use. Air lines can be fitted to prevent this.
16.3.8. Face and eye protectors should give adequate protection at all times even with
the use of corrective vision devices.
16.3.9. Eye protectors, including corrective lenses, should be made of appropriate
high-impact material.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
71
16.5.3. When selecting respirators, an appropriate number of sizes and models should
be available from which a satisfactory respirator can be selected. Different sizes and
models should be available to accommodate a broad range of facial types. Workers should
be fit-tested for respirators.
16.5.4. Respirators should be cleaned and sanitized periodically. Respirators intended
for emergency use should be cleaned and sanitized after each use.
16.5.5. The user should be sufficiently trained and familiar with the respirator in
order to be able to inspect the respirator immediately prior to each use to ensure that it is in
proper working condition. Inspection may include the following:
(a) tightness of connections;
(b) the condition of the respiratory inlet and outlet covering;
(c) head harness;
(d) valves;
(e) connecting tubes;
(f)
harness assemblies;
(g) hoses;
(h) filters;
(i)
cartridges;
(j)
(m) the proper function of regulators, alarms and other warning systems.
16.5.6. Respirators should be properly stored. Damage may occur if they are not
protected from physical and chemical agents such as vibration, sunlight, heat, extreme
cold, excessive moisture or damaging chemicals.
16.5.7. Each respirator should be used with an understanding of its limitations, based
on a number of factors such as the level and duration of exposure, the characteristics of the
chemical and the service life of a respirator.
16.5.8. Workers should be medically evaluated for their ability to wear a respirator
safely before they are required to do so.
72
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
16.6.2. Hearing loss of speech frequencies may occur with elevated long-term
exposure to noise. The use of hearing protectors gives the best results to users who are well
informed of the risks and trained in their use. If earplugs are used, special attention should
be paid to the proper fitting technique.
16.6.3. Hearing protectors should be comfortable, and the users should be trained to
use them properly. Special attention should be paid to possible increased risk of accidents
due to the use of hearing protectors. Earmuffs reduce the capacity to locate sound sources
and prevent warning signals from being heard. This is especially true for workers with
considerable hearing loss.
16.6.4. No model is suitable for all persons. Those wearing hearing protectors should
be able to choose from alternative products that meet the attenuation criteria. Earplugs
should not be the only solution as not all people can wear them.
16.6.5. Hearing protectors should be made available at the entrance to the noisy area
and they should be put on before entering the noisy area. Noisy areas should be indicated
by appropriate signs.
16.6.6. The attenuation of hearing protectors works well only if they are well
maintained. Good maintenance consists of cleaning, changing replaceable parts such as
cushions, and overall monitoring of the state of the hearing protector.
16.6.7. Hearing protectors should be evaluated through an audiometric test
programme for exposed workers.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
73
(a) the adequacy of the design and the fit of the clothing, allowing freedom of movement
to perform tasks, and whether it is suitable for the intended use;
(b) the environment in which it will be worn, including the ability of the material from
which it is made to resist penetration by chemicals, minimize heat stress, release dust,
resist catching fire and not discharge static electricity; and
(c) the special requirements of workers exposed to molten metal and associated hazards,
such as the need for reflective clothing or insulated clothing with reflective surfaces
during exposure to high radiant heat and hot air.
16.8.3. Work clothes contaminated with a chemical substance or substances should
be washed (if reusable) or disposed of in a workplace facility.
16.8.4. Before reissuing the clothing, employers should provide for the laundering,
cleaning, disinfecting and examination of protective clothing which has been used and may
be contaminated by materials that are hazardous to health.
16.8.5. The employer should ensure that a worker removes protective clothing before
leaving the containment area or any workplace exposed to asbestos dust, or any other
substance that may pose a risk outside the containment area. Contaminated clothing should
be disposed of safely.
16.8.6. Inspection of protective clothing should be performed by the user before each
use.
74
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
17.
17.1. General
17.1.1. Any comprehensive OSH programme should include plans for emergency
response.
17.1.2. The emergency response plans should include, at a minimum, the following:
(a) the roles and responsibilities of the workers assigned to respond;
(b) emergency escape routes and procedures;
(c) procedures to be followed by workers who remain to perform critical operations
before they evacuate;
(d) the evacuation of the worksite;
(e) procedures to account for all workers after the emergency evacuation is complete;
(f)
rescue, medical and other duties for workers who are assigned to perform them;
providing relevant information and training to all personnel of the facility, at all
levels, including regular exercises in emergency prevention, preparedness and
response procedures.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
75
17.2.3. Written instructions about first aid should be displayed by the employer at
strategic places at the facility.
17.2.4. The first-aid programme in each workplace should be designed in
coordination with the medical facility which provides the continuing care for its injured
workers.
17.2.5. The employer should organize briefings for all workers. The following are
essential parts of the briefing:
(a) the organization of first aid at the facility, including the procedure for access to
additional care;
(b) identification of colleagues who have been appointed as first-aid personnel;
(c) ways in which information about an accident should be communicated, and to whom;
(d) location of the first-aid box;
(e) location of the first-aid room;
(f)
17.2.6. The content of first-aid boxes should be appropriate to the risks to the
workers and for the protection of first-aid providers and should be maintained.
17.2.7. First-aid personnel should be selected carefully, taking into account attributes
such as reliability, motivation and the ability to cope with people in a crisis situation.
17.2.8. Where medical care is required, such services should be established in
cooperation with external emergency services.
76
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
77
18.
Work organization
78
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
19.
Special protection
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
79
19.3.4. Testing of bodily samples for alcohol and drugs in the context of employment
involves moral, ethical and legal issues of fundamental importance, requiring a
determination of when it is fair and appropriate to conduct such testing.
19.3.5. Workers who seek treatment and rehabilitation for alcohol- or drug-related
problems should not be disciplined or discriminated against by the employer and should
enjoy normal job security. Any information communicated should be treated with
confidentiality.
19.3.6. It should be recognized that the employer has authority to discipline workers
for employment-related misconduct associated with alcohol and drugs. However,
counselling, treatment and rehabilitation should be preferred to disciplinary action.
19.4. HIV/AIDS
19.4.1. HIV/AIDS should be treated like any other serious illness/condition in the
workplace.
19.4.2. The ILO code of practice HIV/AIDS and the world of work should be
instrumental in helping to prevent the spread of the epidemic, mitigate its impact on
workers and their families and provide social protection to help cope with the disease.
19.4.3. The work environment should be healthy and safe in order to prevent
transmission of HIV. Employers should take steps to prevent the transmission of HIV and
other blood-borne pathogens, particularly with respect to emergency response. Universal
precaution should be applied with respect to first aid and other medical procedures and to
the handling of other potentially infected material.
19.4.4. There should be no disciplinary action nor discrimination against workers on
the basis of real or perceived HIV status.
19.4.5. In workplaces, it is recommended to have an HIV/AIDS policy and
programme, the successful implementation of which requires cooperation and trust
between employers, workers and their representatives.
19.4.6. There should be no discrimination against workers with HIV/AIDS in access to and
receipt of benefits from statutory social security programmes and occupational health services.
80
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
20.
Personal hygiene
20.1. Adequate washing facilities, including hot and cold or warm running water,
together with soap or other cleaning materials and towels or other drying equipment,
should be provided.
20.2. The washing facilities should be conveniently accessible but situated so that
they are not themselves exposed to contamination from the workplace.
20.3. Suitable toilets should be provided by the employer.
20.4. Toilets, washing facilities and areas set aside for eating should be kept clean
and in a hygienic condition by the employer.
20.5. The type of washing facilities should be related to the nature and degree of
exposure.
20.6. Facilities for storing personal clothing should be provided when protective
clothing is used or when there is a risk of the contamination of personal clothing by
hazardous materials.
20.7. Changing facilities should be situated and designed so as to prevent the spread
of contamination from protective clothing to personal clothing and from one facility to
another.
20.8. To reduce the risk of ingesting materials hazardous to health, workers should
not eat, chew, drink or smoke in a work area contaminated by such materials. If it is
necessary to prohibit eating or drinking at the workplace, suitable facilities should be set
aside for these activities to be carried out in an uncontaminated area, which should be
conveniently accessible to the work area.
20.9. Floors should be slip-resistant and well drained.
20.10. Spillages, leaks and splashes should be promptly cleaned up.
20.11. Safe drinking water should be provided and be readily accessible to all
workers.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
81
Bibliography
The International Labour Conference has adopted a large number of international
labour Conventions and accompanying Recommendations directly concerned with OSH
issues. The ILO has also developed many codes of practice and technical publications
applicable to the iron and steel industry. They represent a body of definitions, principles,
obligations, duties and rights, as well as technical guidance reflecting the consensual views
of the ILOs tripartite constituents from its 177 member States on most aspects of OSH.
1.
1.1.
Freedom of association
!
Minimum Age Convention (No. 138) and Recommendation (No. 146), 1973
Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (No. 182) and Recommendation (No. 190),
1999
1.2.
82
Equal Remuneration Convention (No. 100) and Recommendation (No. 90), 1951
Radiation Protection Convention (No. 115) and Recommendation (No. 114), 1960
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
2.
Guarding of Machinery Convention (No. 119) and Recommendation (No. 118), 1963*
Employment Injury Benefit Convention (No. 121) and Recommendation (No. 121),
1964
Maximum Weight Convention (No. 127) and Recommendation (No. 128), 1967
Occupational Cancer Convention (No. 139) and Recommendation (No. 147), 1974
Working Environment (Air Pollution, Noise and Vibration) Convention (No. 148)
and Recommendation (No. 156), 1977
Occupational Health Services Convention (No. 161) and Recommendation (No. 171),
1985
Night Work Convention (No. 171) and Recommendation (No. 178), 1990
Maternity Protection Convention (No. 183) and Recommendation (No. 191), 2000
Protection of workers against noise and vibration in the working environment, 1977
Occupational safety and health in the iron and steel industry, 1983
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
83
3.
Safety in the use of synthetic vitreous fibre insulation wools (glass wool, rock wool,
slag wool), 2001
Relevant publications
ILO. 1998. Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and its Follow-up,
International Labour Conference, 86th Session (Geneva).
. 1998. Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety, 4th edition (Geneva) (fourvolume print version and CD-ROM).
. 1998. Technical and ethical guidelines for workers health surveillance, Occupational
Safety and Health Series, No. 72 (Geneva).
. 2001. Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems, ILO-OSH
2001 (Geneva).
. 2004. Safety and health in shipbreaking: Guidelines for Asian countries and Turkey
(Geneva).
International Iron and Steel Institute. 1998. Accident-free steel (Brussels).
International Metalworkers Federation. 1999. Health and safety in the steel industry: A
workers handbook (Geneva).
United Nations. 2003. Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling
(Geneva).
84
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
Annex I
Hazard identification, risk assessment and control
An organization should establish, implement and maintain documented procedures to ensure
that the following are conducted:
1.
hazard identification;
2.
risk assessment;
3.
4.
Hazard identification
The identification of hazards in the workplace should take into account
(a)
the situation or events or combination of circumstances that have the potential to give rise to
injury or illness;
(b)
the nature of potential injury or illness relevant to the activity, product or service; and
(c)
I.
the way work is organized, managed, carried out and any changes that occur in this;
II.
III.
the fabrication, installation and commissioning and handling and disposal of materials,
workplaces, plant and equipment;
the contracting of plant, equipment, services and labour including contract specification and
responsibilities to and by contractors;
VI. the inspection, maintenance, testing, repair and replacement of plant and equipment.
Risk assessment
Risk assessment is a process used to determine the level of risk of injury or illness associated
with each identified hazard, for the purpose of control. All risks should be assessed and have control
priorities assigned, based on the established level of risk. The priority for control increases as the
established level of risk increases.
The risk assessment process should take account of the likelihood and severity of injury or
illness from the identified hazard. There are many established methods and techniques for the
purpose of risk assessment.
Risk control
Unless a particular hazard is removed, the risk associated with such a hazard can never be
completely eliminated.
Organizations should plan the management and control of those activities, products and
services that can or may pose a significant risk to health and safety.
The approach most commonly used is referred to as a hierarchy of control, from preferred, to
the least desirable as follows:
(a)
elimination;
(b)
substitution;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
85
(c)
engineering controls;
(d)
(e)
Evaluation
The processes of hazard identification, risk assessment and control should be subject to a
documented evaluation of effectiveness and modified as necessary, and therefore being an ongoing
process.
86
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
Annex II
Workers health surveillance
(adapted from the ILO Technical and ethical guidelines
for workers health surveillance, 1998)
1.
General principles
1.1. Competent authorities should ensure that laws and regulations governing workers health
surveillance are properly applied.
1.2. Workers health surveillance should be carried out in consultation with workers and/or
their representatives:
2.
(a)
with the central purpose of primary prevention of occupational and work-related injuries and
diseases;
(b)
Organization
2.1. The organization of workers health surveillance at different levels (national, industry,
enterprise) should take into account:
(a)
the need for a thorough investigation of all work-related factors and the nature of occupational
hazards and risks in the workplace which may affect workers health;
(b)
the health requirements of the work and the health status of the working population;
(c)
(d)
the awareness of workers and employers of the functions and purposes of such surveillance;
(e)
the fact that surveillance is not a substitute for monitoring and control of the working
environment.
2.2. In accordance with the needs and available resources, workers health surveillance should
be carried out at national, industry, enterprise and/or other appropriate levels. Provided that
surveillance is carried out or supervised by qualified occupational health professionals, as
prescribed by national laws and regulations, it can be undertaken by:
(a)
occupational health services established in a variety of settings, e.g. within one enterprise or
among enterprises;
(b)
(c)
the occupational and/or public health facilities available in the community where the
enterprise is located;
(d)
(e)
worker-run centres;
(f)
(g)
(a)
include individual and collective health assessments, occupational injury and disease
recording and notification, sentinel event notification, surveys, investigations and inspections;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
87
3.
(b)
comprise the collection of information from various sources, and the analysis and evaluation
with regard to quality and intended use;
(c)
(ii)
early warning capabilities so that the competent authority, employers, workers and their
representatives, occupational health professionals and research institutions can be alerted
to existing or emerging occupational safety and health problems.
Assessment
3.1. Medical examinations and consultations as the most commonly used means of health
assessment of individual workers, either as part of screening programmes or on an as-needed basis,
should serve the following purposes:
(a)
the assessment of the health of workers in relation to hazards or risks, giving special attention
to those workers having specific needs for protection in relation to their health condition;
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
assessment of fitness for a particular type of work with due regard for the adaptation of the
workplace to the worker, taking into account individual susceptibility.
3.2. Pre-assignment medical examinations, where appropriate, carried out before or shortly
after employment or assignment, should:
(a)
(b)
be adapted to the type of work, vocational fitness criteria and workplace hazards.
3.3. During employment, medical examinations should take place at periodic intervals, as
prescribed by national laws and regulations, and be appropriate to the occupational risks of the
enterprise. These examinations should also be repeated:
(a)
(b)
at the request of the worker, for example, in the case of change of work and, in particular,
change of work for health reasons.
3.4. Where persons have been exposed to hazards and, as a consequence, there is a significant
risk to their health in the long term, suitable arrangements should be made for post-employment
medical surveillance for the purposes of ensuring the early diagnosis and treatment of such diseases.
3.5. Biological tests and other investigations should be prescribed by national laws and
regulations. They should be subject to the workers informed consent and performed according to
the highest professional standards and least possible risk. These tests and investigations should not
introduce unnecessary new hazards to the workers.
3.6. Genetic screening should be prohibited or limited to cases explicitly authorized by
national legislation, in accordance with the ILO code of practice Protection of workers personal
data.
4.
88
be collected and stored in conformity with medical confidentiality, in accordance with the ILO
code of practice Protection of workers personal data (Geneva, 1997);
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(b)
be used to protect the health of workers (physical, mental and social well-being) individually
and collectively, in accordance with the ILO Technical and ethical guidelines for workers
health surveillance.
4.2. The results and records of workers health surveillance should:
(a)
(b)
not be used for unwarranted discrimination, for which there should be recourse in national law
and practice;
(c)
be made available, where requested by the competent authority, to any other party agreed by
both employers and workers, to prepare appropriate health statistics and epidemiological
studies, provided anonymity is maintained, where this may aid in the recognition and control
of occupational injuries and diseases;
(d)
be kept during the time and under conditions prescribed by national laws and regulations, with
appropriate arrangements to ensure that workers health surveillance records are securely
maintained for establishments that have closed down.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
89
Annex III
Surveillance of the working environment
(according to the Occupational Health Services
Recommendation, 1985 (No. 171))
1. The surveillance of the working environment should include:
(a)
identification and evaluation of the hazards and risks which may affect the workers safety and
health;
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
2. Such surveillance should be carried out in liaison with the other technical services of the
undertaking and in cooperation with the workers concerned and their representatives in the
undertaking and/or the safety and health committee, where they exist.
3. In accordance with national law and practice, data resulting from the surveillance of the
working environment should be recorded in an appropriate manner and be available to the
employer, the workers and their representatives in the undertaking concerned or the safety and
health committee, where they exist.
4. These data should be used on a confidential basis and solely to provide guidance and
advice on measures to improve the working environment and the safety and health of workers.
5. The competent authority should have access to these data. They may only be
communicated to others with the agreement of the employer and the workers or their representatives
in the undertaking or the safety and health committee, where they exist.
6. The surveillance of the working environment should entail such visits by the personnel
providing occupational health services as may be necessary to examine the factors in the working
environment which may affect the workers health, the environmental health conditions at the
workplace and the working conditions.
7. Without prejudice to the responsibility of each employer for the safety and health of
workers in his/her employment, and with due regard to the necessity for the workers to participate in
matters of occupational safety and health, personnel providing occupational health services should
have such of the following functions as are adequate and appropriate to the occupational risks of the
undertaking:
(a)
carry out monitoring of workers exposure to hazards and risks, when necessary;
(b)
advise on the possible impact on the workers health of the use of technologies;
(c)
participate in and advise on the selection of the equipment necessary for the personal
protection of the workers against occupational hazards;
(d)
collaborate in job analysis and in the study of organization and methods of work with a view
to securing a better adaptation of work to the workers;
(e)
participate in the analysis of occupational accidents and occupational diseases and in accident
prevention programmes;
(f)
supervise sanitary installations and other facilities for the workers, such as drinking water,
canteens and living accommodation, when provided by the employer.
8. Personnel providing occupational health services should, after informing the employer,
workers and their representatives, where appropriate:
90
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(a)
have free access to all workplaces and to the installations the undertaking provides for the
workers;
(b)
(c)
be able to take for the purpose of analysis samples of products, materials and substances used
or handled.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
91
Annex IV
Establishing an OSH management system
(adapted from the ILO Guidelines on occupational safety
and health management systems, ILO/OSH 2001)
1.
Introduction
1.1. The positive impact of introducing occupational safety and health (OSH) management
systems at the enterprise level, both on the reduction of hazards and risks and on productivity, is
now recognized internationally by governments, employers and workers. The mutual benefits that
accrue from the introduction of such systems should not be ignored if progress on improving safety
and health and productivity in the iron and steel industry is to be achieved.
While systems need to be specific to an iron or steel-making facility and appropriate to the
size and nature of activities, many elements of the ILO-OSH 2001 guidelines are generic and
assistance from other industry sectors should not be difficult to obtain when implementing such a
system. The design and application of OSH management systems at national and facility levels for
iron- and steel-making should be guided by the ILO Guidelines on occupational safety and health
management systems, ILO-OSH 2001.
1.2. The competent authority should:
(a)
promote the implementation and integration of OSH management systems as an integral part
of the overall management of iron- and steel-making facilities;
(b)
(c)
(d)
provide support and technical guidance to labour inspectorates, OSH services and other public
or private services, agencies and institutions dealing with OSH, including health-care
providers;
(e)
ensure that guidance is provided to employers and workers to assist them to comply with their
legal obligations under the policy;
(f)
ensure cooperation between employers whenever two or more facilities engage in activities on
the same project;
(g)
recognize the need, so long as the safety and health of workers are not compromised, to
protect confidential information that could potentially cause harm to an employers business.
1.3. With a view to developing, implementing and operating OSH management systems,
employers should:
92
(a)
set out in writing their respective OSH policy, programmes and safety and health protection
arrangements as part of the general facility management policy;
(b)
define the various safety and health responsibilities, accountability and authority levels and
communicate these clearly to their workers, visitors or any other persons working in the
facility, as appropriate;
(c)
ensure effective arrangements for the full participation of workers and their representatives in
the fulfilment of the OSH policy;
(d)
define both the necessary OSH competence requirements for all persons and the consequent
individual training needs;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
2.
(e)
ensure workers have sufficient information, in a form and language that they understand, to
protect their health from hazardous ambient factors;
(f)
(g)
identify the hazards and carry out assessments of the specific risks to safety and health of
workers presented in the workplace;
(h)
(i)
establish procedures for the compliance with OSH requirements in purchasing and leasing
specifications and for contractors working on the site;
(j)
develop, establish and review procedures to monitor, measure and record OSH performance,
taking into consideration the results of the investigations of work-related injuries and diseases,
OSH compliance audits and reviews of the OSH system by management; and
(k)
identify and implement preventive and corrective actions and opportunities for continual
improvement.
be specific to the facility and appropriate to its size and the nature of its activities;
(b)
recognize OSH as an integral part of the overall management structure and OSH performance
as an integral part of the business performance of the facility.
2.2. The OSH policy should include, as a minimum, the following key principles and
objectives to which the facility management is committed:
(a)
recognizing OSH as an integral part of the overall management structure and OSH
performance as an integral part of the establishments business performance;
(b)
protecting the safety and health of all members of the establishment by preventing workrelated injuries, ill health, diseases and incidents;
(c)
complying with relevant OSH national laws and regulations, voluntary programmes, collective
agreements on OSH and other requirements to which the establishment subscribes or may
wish to subscribe;
(d)
ensuring that workers and their representatives are consulted and encouraged to participate
actively in all elements of the OSH management system; and
(e)
2.3. The extent and precise nature of a safety and health policy will clearly depend on the size
and scope of the iron- or steel-making facility, but certain key components should be incorporated.
These are:
(a)
(b)
the identification of those personnel who have been assigned specific responsibilities in the
area of safety and health;
(c)
the provision of equipment and substances in order to ensure a safe and healthy working
environment;
(d)
arrangements for liaison with other concerned bodies, for example legislators, workers
organizations, public utilities such as water and electricity authorities, and organizations
responsible for environmental conservation;
(e)
(f)
procedures for the enforcement of safety requirements adopted by the establishment whether
by laws and regulations or otherwise;
(g)
procedures for the reporting of accidents, dangerous occurrences and occupational diseases;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
93
3.
(h)
the means by which the policy will be communicated to all those involved including the date
on which the policy will be reviewed and, as necessary, revised;
(i)
emergency procedures.
Worker participation
3.1. Worker participation should be an essential element of the OSH management system in
the facility. The employer should ensure that workers and their safety and health representatives are
consulted, informed and trained on all aspects of OSH associated with their work, including
emergency arrangements.
3.2. The employer should ensure, as appropriate, the establishment and efficient functioning
of a safety and health committee and the recognition of workers safety and health representatives,
in accordance with national laws and practice. Safety and health committees should include workers
or their representatives, employers representatives and, as far as practicable, an occupational safety
and health expert. Safety and health committees should meet regularly and participate in the
decision-making process related to occupational safety and health-related issues.
4.
implement the facilitys safety and health policy, including through the selection of safe
equipment, work methods and work organization and the maintenance of high levels of skill;
(b)
endeavour to reduce risks and hazards to safety and health in the activities for which they are
responsible to as low a level as possible;
(c)
ensure that workers and contractors receive adequate information on safety and health
regulations, policies, procedures and requirements and satisfy themselves that this information
is understood;
(d)
assign tasks to their subordinates in a clear and precise way. Managers and supervisors should
satisfy themselves that workers understand and implement the safety and health requirements;
(e)
ensure that work is planned, organized and carried out in such a way as to minimize the risk of
accidents and the exposure of workers to conditions that may lead to injury or damage to their
health.
4.5. In consultation with workers, managers and supervisors should assess the need for
additional instruction, training or further education of workers by monitoring compliance with
safety requirements.
4.6. Supervisors should be responsible for monitoring compliance by contractors and their
workers with the requirements for occupational safety and health. In the event of non-compliance,
supervisors should provide appropriate instruction and advice to contractors and their workers
accordingly.
4.7. Workers should be made clearly aware of their rights and individual and collective duties
for safety and health matters, as prescribed by national laws and regulations or adapted regulations
of the facility.
94
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(b)
make themselves aware of and operate according to the commissioning parties policies and
strategies for the promotion of safety and health and should comply and cooperate with related
measures and requirements.
4.10. Contractors should comply with national laws and regulations concerning terms of
employment, workers compensation, labour inspection and occupational safety and health.
5.
6.
Documentation
6.1. According to the size and nature of activity of the facility, OSH management system
documentation should be established and maintained, and may cover:
(a)
(b)
the allocated key OSH management responsibilities of management, supervisors, workers and
contractors, for the implementation of the OSH management system;
(c)
the significant OSH hazards/risks arising from the activities of the facility, including a list of
all hazardous substances in the workplace, and the arrangements for their prevention and
control; and
(d)
arrangements, procedures, instructions or other internal documents concerning the safety and
health of workers used within the OSH management system.
6.2. OSH records should be established, managed and maintained locally and according to the
needs of the establishment. They should be identifiable and traceable, and their retention times
should be specified.
6.3. OSH documentation should be available to all workers, workers representatives, or other
parties having an interest in or affected by its contents.
6.4. OSH records may include:
7.
(a)
(b)
records of work-related injuries, ill health, diseases and incidents, and relevant costs;
(c)
(d)
records of workers exposures, surveillance of the working environment and workers health;
and
(e)
(b)
ensuring the internal communication of obligatory or other OSH information between relevant
levels and functions of the enterprise in the management framework; and
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
95
(c)
ensuring that the concerns, ideas and inputs of workers and their representatives on OSH
matters are received, considered and responded to.
7.2. In order to ensure the full integration of safety and health concerns into iron- and steelmaking operations, guidelines on working practices or operations manuals should incorporate safety
and health regulations and advice alongside provisions pertaining to quality, productivity,
environmental and other aspects.
8.
Initial review
8.1. The existing OSH arrangements in a facility should be evaluated by an initial review, as
appropriate. In the case where no formal OSH arrangements exist, or if the facility is newly
established, an initial review should serve as a basis for establishing an OSH management system.
Before conducting the review, three key questions should systematically be answered:
(a)
(b)
(c)
8.2. In the context of an iron- or steel-making facility, an initial review in the form of an
inventory survey should be completed by competent persons. The inventory or initial review should:
(a)
identify, quantify, locate or anticipate physical, chemical, biological and other hazards and
assess risks to safety and health arising from the existing or proposed work environment and
work organization; and
(b)
result in the creation of an inventory list of hazardous substances (wastes) and other
substances.
8.3. Additional reviews, as appropriate, should:
(a)
identify the current applicable national laws and regulations, national guidelines, tailored
guidelines, voluntary schemes and other requirements to which the establishment subscribes;
(b)
determine whether planned or existing controls are adequate to eliminate hazards or control
risks; and
(c)
analyse other available data, in particular data provided from workers health surveillance (see
Annex I) and surveillance of the working environment (see Annex II).
8.4. The employer of the iron- or steel-making establishment should establish and maintain
procedures to identify, evaluate systematically and record the hazards and risks to safety and health
that may affect, or arise from iron- and steel-making activities.
9.
define OSH objectives for the reduction of such risks to as low a level as possible;
(b)
(c)
develop, approve and implement a safe iron- or steel-making plan before any operation
starts.
These activities should include the routine application of site inspection and planning as well as of
the principles of work organization.
9.2. The planning arrangements should contribute to the improved protection of safety and
health at work, and should include:
(a)
96
a clear definition, priority setting and quantification, where appropriate, of the OSH objectives
of the establishment;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(b)
the preparation of a plan for achieving each objective, with defined responsibility and clear
performance criteria indicating what is to be done by whom and when and what is the
predicted result;
(c)
the selection of measurement criteria (indicators) for confirming that the objectives are
achieved; and
(d)
the provision for adequate resources, including human and financial resources and technical
support, as appropriate.
9.3. Resource allocation should include, among others:
10.
(a)
the facilities, tools and equipment required to meet legislative and other adopted standards;
(b)
an organized infrastructure to respond to and mitigate the effects of accident risks and health
hazards;
(c)
(d)
11.
(a)
specific to the facility, and appropriate to and according to its size and nature of activity;
(b)
consistent with the relevant and applicable national laws and regulations, and the technical and
business obligations of the facility with regard to OSH;
(c)
focused towards continually improving workers OSH protection to achieve the best OSH
performance;
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
documented, and communicated to all relevant functions and levels of the enterprise; and
(h)
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
97
(a)
(b)
control the hazard/risk at source, through the use of engineering controls or organizational
measures;
(c)
minimize the hazard/risk by the design of safe work systems, which include administrative
control measures; and
(d)
where residual hazards/risks cannot be controlled by collective measures, the employer should
provide for appropriate PPE, including clothing, at no cost, and should implement measures to
ensure its use and maintenance.
11.6. The impact on OSH of internal changes (e.g. those in staffing or due to new processes,
working procedures, organizational structures or acquisitions) and of external changes (e.g. as a
result of amendments of national laws and regulations, organizational mergers, and developments in
OSH knowledge and technology) should be evaluated and appropriate preventive steps taken prior
to the introduction of changes.
11.7. A workplace hazard identification and risk assessment should be carried out before any
modification or introduction of new work methods, materials, processes or machinery.
11.8. Procedures should be established and maintained to ensure that:
(a)
compliance with safety and health requirements for the establishment is identified, evaluated
and incorporated into purchasing and leasing specifications;
(b)
national laws and regulations and the own OSH requirements of the establishment are
identified prior to the procurement of goods and services; and
(c)
arrangements are made to achieve conformance with the requirements prior to their use.
11.9. Arrangements should be established and maintained for ensuring that the safety and
health requirements of the facility, or at least the equivalent, are applied to contractors and their
workers.
12.
(b)
information to determine whether the day-to-day arrangements for hazard and risk
identification, prevention and control are in place and operating effectively; and
(c)
the basis for decisions about improvement in hazard identification and risk control, and the
OSH management system.
12.3. Active monitoring should contain the elements necessary to have a proactive system and
should include:
(a)
(b)
(c)
surveillance of the working environment (see Annex II), including work organization;
(d)
surveillance of workers health (see Annex I), where appropriate, through suitable medical
monitoring or follow-up of workers for early detection of signs and symptoms of harm to
health in order to determine the effectiveness of preventive and protective measures; and
(e)
compliance with applicable national laws and regulations, collective agreements and other
commitments on OSH to which the establishment subscribes.
12.4. Reactive monitoring should include the identification, reporting and investigation of:
98
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
13.
(a)
work-related injuries, ill health (including monitoring of aggregate sickness absence records),
diseases and incidents;
(b)
(c)
deficient safety and health performance, and OSH management system failures; and
(d)
appropriate persons for corrective action, included in the management review and considered
for continual improvement activities; and
(b)
14.
Audit
14.1. Arrangements to conduct periodic audits are to be established in order to determine
whether the OSH management system and its elements are in place, adequate, and effective in
protecting the safety and health of workers and preventing incidents.
14.2. The audit should evaluate all elements of the facilitys OSH management system or a
subset of these, as appropriate. Its conclusion should determine whether the implemented OSH
management system elements or subset:
(a)
are effective in meeting the OSH policy and objectives of the facility;
(b)
(c)
(d)
enable the facility to achieve compliance with relevant national laws and regulations; and
(e)
fulfil the goals for continual improvement and best OSH practice.
14.3. Consultation on selection of the auditor and all stages of the workplace audit, including
analysis of results, are subject to worker participation, as appropriate.
15.
Management review
15.1. A management review should:
(a)
evaluate the overall strategy of the OSH management system to determine whether it meets
planned performance objectives;
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
99
(b)
evaluate the OSH management systems ability to meet the overall needs of the establishment
and its stakeholders, including its workers and the regulatory authorities;
(c)
identify what action is necessary to remedy any deficiencies in a timely manner, including
adaptations of other aspects of the management structure and performance measurement of the
establishment.
15.2. The findings of a management review should be recorded and formally communicated
to:
16.
(a)
the persons responsible for the relevant element(s) of the OSH management system so that
they may take appropriate action; and
(b)
17.
Continual improvement
17.1. Arrangements should be established and maintained for the continual improvement of
the relevant elements of the OSH management system and the system as a whole. The safety and
health processes and performance of the facility should be compared with others in order to improve
safety and health performance.
100
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
Annex V
Occupational exposure limits for hazardous
substances, electric and magnetic fields, optical
radiation, heat, noise and vibration
1.
Purpose
1.1. This annex gives a general introduction to exposure limits for the use of employers and
others, and indicates where more information can be obtained. Although some illustrative values are
quoted, it is not the purpose of this annex to list values, because these change continually as more
technical information becomes available, and it is the responsibility of the competent authority to
specify which exposure limits should be used and how.
1.2. Certain standard-setting bodies rely on technical expertise only. They do not accurately
reflect the views of the social partners, e.g. trade unions. This should be taken into account when
referring to the standards mentioned in this annex.
2.
General
2.1. An exposure limit (EL) is a level of exposure specified by a competent authority, or some
other authoritative organization such as a professional body, as an indicator of the level to which
workers can be exposed without serious injury. It is used as a general term and covers the various
expressions employed in national lists, such as maximum allowable concentration, threshold
limit value, permissible level, limit value, average limit value, permissible limit,
occupational exposure limit, industrial hygiene standards, and so on. The exact definition and
intended application of ELs vary widely from one authority to another, and the underlying
definitions and assumptions and the requirements of the appropriate competent authority should be
taken into account if they are used. For example, some authorities have promulgated ELs that are
used as legally permitted safe levels of exposure and are intended to protect against injury, not
against every health effect. Other authorities provide for limits intended as guidelines or
recommendations in the control of potential workplace health hazards.
2.2. Administrative control levels are provided by the competent authority in Japan. These
levels are not limits for individual exposure; they constitute an index to determine the control
category (level of cleanliness), and to assess the adequacy of control measures in the working
environment. The control category is based on the results of working environment measurements in
the work area.
2.3. An important example of the caution to be applied in using ELs is provided in the
introduction to the annual publication Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical
agents and biological exposure indices of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH): threshold limit values (TLVs) represent conditions under which it is believed
that nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed day after day without adverse health effects.
Because of wide variation in individual susceptibility, however, a small percentage of workers may
experience discomfort from some substances at concentrations at or below the threshold limit; a
smaller percentage may be affected more seriously. Consequently, any EL represents a risk that is
felt to be acceptable based on a particular criterion, and where such limits are promulgated there is
usually an additional requirement to keep exposure as low as practicable, rather than simply below
the EL.
2.4. It is also important to take into account the averaging period for which the limit is
intended. Some limits are ceiling values to be continuously applied; others apply to average
exposures over a period of up to several years. A short-period limit requires stricter control than a
longer-period limit at the same exposure value. For example, a limit applying to a month might
allow the exposure to range above the value for days at a time, provided there was a compensating
period of low exposure that maintained the monthly average. If the same value were applied to 15minute averages, the control would have to be good enough to keep every 15-minute average below
the value.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
101
2.5. ELs generally limit exposure of the individual, and measurements to be compared with
the EL must therefore be taken close to the individual (personal exposure), unless the EL in
question is clearly stated to be applicable to the general value in the workplace environment. A
measurement result sometimes depends on the measurement method, and quality control of
measurements is often important; employers should consult the occupational health service,
including the competent authority, on these issues.
2.6. Some authorities issue lists of values to be used in biological monitoring or in biological
effect monitoring. As with ELs, different lists are derived from different assumptions and are
intended to be used in different ways. They include lists of values that are believed to be safe, and
values that are not necessarily safe but that represent an acceptable standard of control.
3.
General sources
3.1. It is the responsibility of the competent authority to specify what ELs should be used, and
the responsibility of the employer to obtain this information from the competent authority for any
particular hazard and to compare the EL values with exposure levels in workplaces in order to
verify whether exposure is being properly controlled. A large number of international, national and
other authorities have published lists of legal or recommended ELs of various sorts, but usually only
for chemicals. The most wide-ranging is the ACGIH TLV list, updated annually, which includes
recommended EL values for airborne chemicals; biological monitoring limits; ionizing, nonionizing and optical radiation; thermal stress; noise; and vibration. The International Programme on
Chemical Safety (IPCS) produces IPCS International Chemical Safety Cards, which are peerreviewed assessment documents. International organizations, such as the International Organization
for Standardization (ISO) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), produce technical
standards on the measurement and control of several ambient factors with the objective of their
being transferred to regional or national legislation.
3.2. For all the ambient factors dealt with in this code of practice, detailed guidance on ELs
and other aspects of assessment and control is provided by the ILO Encyclopaedia of occupational
health and safety (Geneva, 4th edition, 1998). Some references concerning ELs for particular
ambient factors are given in the following sections.
4.
Hazardous substances
4.1. ELs for solids and non-volatile liquids are usually in mg/m (milligrams of the chemical
in a cubic metre of air). ELs for gases and vapours are usually in ppm (parts of the substance in a
million parts of air, by volume), and also in mg/m at a specified temperature and pressure. A
smaller number of lists of ELs is available for biological monitoring.
4.2. Many authorities have issued lists of ELs for airborne chemicals, on various assumptions.
The International Occupational Safety and Health Information Centre (CIS) of the ILO maintains a
database of the limits from different parts of the world. For the time being, peer-reviewed IPCS
International Chemical Safety Cards are available for around 1,300 chemical substances.
4.3. There are European standards for:
(a)
(b)
comparison of the results with ELs: EN 689: Workplace atmospheres Guidance for the
assessment of exposure by inhalation to chemical agents for comparison with limit values and
measurement strategy (1996).
4.4. Recommended values are given in Threshold limit values for chemical substances and
physical agents and biological exposure indices (see paragraph 2.3).
4.5. Prominent national standards are:
102
(a)
EH 40: Occupational exposure limits (United Kingdom, Health and Safety Executive (HSE))
(revised annually);
(b)
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
(c)
5.
Code of Federal Regulations, 1910. Subpart Z: Hazardous and toxic substances (United States
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2001).
Non-ionizing radiation
5.1. The term non-ionizing radiation is given to those regions of the electromagnetic
spectrum where the energies of the emitted photons are insufficient, under normal conditions, to
produce ionization in the atoms of absorbing molecules. They are usually referred to as ultraviolet,
visible and infrared radiation.
5.2. There are as yet no internationally accepted sets of limits for electric and magnetic fields
corresponding to the recommendations on ionizing radiation issued by the International
Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), although some ELs have been recommended by
the International Non-Ionizing Radiation Committee (INIRC) of the International Radiation
Protection Association (IRPA), and by its successor, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing
Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Some limits proposed by these and other organizations are in terms
of the physical or physiological effects of the radiation, and some in terms of the strengths of the
fields. The relations between the units and quantities are complicated, and different quantities have
been used in recommended ELs. Many of the recommendations depend on the frequency of the
radiation. Units for time-varying quantities usually refer to the root-mean-square (rms) values.
5.3. Guidelines and recommendations can be found in the practical guide on Protection of
workers from power frequency electric and magnetic fields, Occupational Safety and Health Series,
No. 69 (Geneva, ILO, 1994); and in Human exposure to electromagnetic fields, ENV 50166-1 (low
frequencies) and ENV 50166-2 (high frequencies) (Brussels, European Committee for
Electrotechnical Standardization, 1995).
6.
Ionizing radiation
6.1. Ionizing radiation is produced when atoms break up. The energy released in this process
takes a number of forms that have typical wavelength and frequency, energy and penetrating power.
6.2. Alpha, beta and gamma radiation have sufficient energy to alter other atoms and are
termed ionizing radiation.
6.3. Alpha and beta radiation are composed of relatively large particles with very little
penetration. While alpha particles travel only a few centimetres in air and are incapable of
penetrating the skin, beta particles have a range of more than 1 metre in air and up to 1 centimetre or
so in tissue. Alpha and beta radiation cause biological damage, mainly from inhaled or ingested
sources of material.
6.4. Gamma radiation or X-rays can pass through tissues from an external source, including
plant walls and equipment.
7.
Heat
7.1. A series of international standards, including those of the ISO, is helpful in the
assessment and monitoring of the thermal environment. ISO 11399:1995 Ergonomics of the thermal
environment Principles and application of relevant international standards is a useful guide to
their application.
7.2. In hot environments, ISO 7243:1989 Hot environments Estimation of the heat stress on
working man, based on the WBGT-index (wet bulb globe temperature) gives a rapid method based
on the WBGT index, which will be satisfactory under most conditions. It may provide insufficient
protection for work in impervious clothing, in high radiant temperature, or a combination of high
temperature and high air velocity. Under these more severe conditions, ISO 7933:1989 Hot
environments Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal stress using calculation of
required sweat rate and ISO 9886:1992 Ergonomics Evaluation of thermal strain by physiological
measurements provide guidance for assessing individual response.
7.3. EN 563: Safety of machinery Temperatures of touchable surfaces Ergonomics data to
establish temperature limit values for hot surfaces (1994) is also relevant.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
103
7.4. The ACGIH publication Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical
agents and biological exposure indices (see paragraph 2.3 of this annex) gives details of work/rest
regimes and is revised annually.
8.
Noise
8.1. Noise is conventionally measured in terms of the pressure of the sound wave. Because
the ear responds roughly to the logarithm of the pressure, rather than its linear value, noise intensity
is measured in decibels (dB), which are related to the logarithm of the ratio of the pressure of the
sound to the pressure of a standardized least detectable sound. Also, the ear is more responsive to
some frequencies than others, so measurements and ELs are in terms of dB(A), which takes a
frequency weighting into account. All authorities specify an EL in terms of dB(A) applicable to
eight-hour exposures, with a formula to deal with other exposure periods, and in most cases a peak
EL as well. Some authorities apply stricter standards to particular environments. Users should apply
standards that are adopted or recognized by the competent authority. These include a series of ISO
standards on acoustics (1999:1990; 4871:1996; 9612:1997; 7196:1995; 11690:1996).
9.
Vibration
9.1. ELs for vibration are usually in terms of the root-mean-square (rms) acceleration,
frequency weighted to take human response into account. The standard is usually applied to eighthour exposures, with a formula to account for shorter or longer periods.
9.2. For whole-body vibration, limits are applied to the longitudinal component (through the
head and feet), to the two axes at right angles to this, and to a weighted combination of all three
(ISO 2631-1:1997).
9.3. For hand-transmitted vibration, limits are applied to frequency-weighted acceleration
along three orthogonal axes centred at the point of contact of the hand and the tool (ISO 5349:1986
provides guidelines for measurement).
104
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
Annex VI
Additional chemicals used in the
iron and steel industry
Ammonia
Short-term (acute) inhalation causes severe irritation of the respiratory tract. Skin contact
results in burns, blistering and, possibly, permanent scarring of the skin. Eye contact causes
irritation and, possibly, corrosive injury.
Benzene
Short-term (acute) inhalation causes depression of the central nervous system, marked by
drowsiness, dizziness, headache, nausea, loss of coordination, confusion and unconsciousness.
Long-term exposure to benzene reduces the number of red and white blood cells and damages bone
marrow. Benzene is carcinogenic.
Carbon monoxide
Inhalation of carbon monoxide causes symptoms including headache, weakness, dizziness,
nausea, fainting, increased heartbeat, irregular heartbeat, loss of consciousness and death.
Chlorine
If inhaled, chlorine causes severe breathing difficulties and pulmonary oedema. It can
aggravate respiratory diseases, such as bronchitis and asthma.
Cyclohexane
Short-term (acute) inhalation can cause headache, nausea, dizziness, drowsiness and
confusion. In very high concentrations, unconsciousness and death can result. Ingestion of
extremely large doses may cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and headache.
Formaldehyde
Short-term (acute) exposure through the inhalation of vapour can cause severe irritation of the
nose, throat and windpipe. Formaldehyde solutions can cause primary irritation resulting in tingling,
drying and reddening of skin. Eye contact results in irritation and tingling of the eye; concentrated
solutions can cause severe eye injury.
Ingestion of formaldehyde causes irritation, severe pain in the mouth, throat, oesophagus and
intestinal tract. Later symptoms can include dizziness, depression and coma.
Long-term (chronic) exposure through inhalation causes irritation of mucous membranes and
the upper respiratory tract. Long-term skin contact causes skin allergy.
Hydrogen cyanide
Short-term (acute) inhalation or ingestion causes weakness, headache, giddiness, dizziness,
confusion, anxiety, nausea and vomiting. High concentrations can cause death within minutes or
hours. There may be a bitter, pungent, burning taste in the mouth.
Long-term (chronic) exposure causes a persistent runny nose, weakness, dizziness, giddiness,
headache, nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, throat irritation, changes in taste and smell, muscle
cramps, weight loss, flushing of the face and enlargement of the thyroid gland.
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc
105
Phenol
Short-term (acute) contact with skin, eye or mucous membranes leads to numbness or slight
tingling, then burns, blisters, permanent skin damage and gangrene, damage to the mouth, throat and
stomach, internal bleeding, vomiting, diarrhoea and decreased blood pressure. Shock, collapse,
coma and death may result.
Sulphuric acid
Short-term (acute) exposure through inhalation can cause severe irritation or corrosive
damage. Symptoms can include severe lung damage, coughing and shortness of breath. Sulphuric
acid is corrosive and contact with the skin causes severe irritation and burns that may result in
permanent scarring. Eye contact results in severe irritation, redness, swelling, pain and, possibly,
permanent damage, including blindness. Ingestion causes burns to the mouth, throat, oesophagus
and stomach. Symptoms include difficulty in swallowing, intense thirst, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea
and, in severe cases, collapse and death.
Long-term (chronic) exposure can cause red, itchy, dry skin and dental erosion.
Toluene
Short-term (acute) exposure through inhalation or ingestion causes central nervous system
depression. Irritation of the nose, throat and respiratory tract are minor symptoms.
106
MEISI05-R-2005-02-0159-1-En.doc