Chapter 12 Marginal Costing
Chapter 12 Marginal Costing
Chapter 12 Marginal Costing
Marginal Costing
Learning Objectives
When you have finished studying this chapter, you should be able to
12.1 Definitions
In order to appreciate the concept of marginal costing, it is necessary to study the definition of
marginal costing and certain other terms associated with this technique. The important terms
have been defined as follows:
1. Marginal costing: The ascertainment of marginal cost and of the effect on profit of
changes in volume or type of output by differentiating between fixed costs and variable costs.
2. Marginal cost: The amount at any given volume of output by which aggregate variable
costs are changed if the volume of output is increased by one unit. In practice this is
measured by the total variable cost attributable to one unit. Marginal cost can precisely be the
sum of prime cost and variable overhead.
Marginal Cost = Variable Cost = Direct Labour + Direct Material + Direct Expenses + Variable
Overheads
Note: In this context a unit may be a single article, a batch of articles, an order, a stage of
production capacity, a process or a department. It relates to the change in output in particular
circumstances under consideration.
3. Direct costing: Direct costing is the practice of charging all direct cost to operations,
processes or products, leaving all indirect costs to be written off against profits in the period in
which they arise. Under direct costing the stocks are valued at direct costs, i.e., costs whether
fixed or variable which can be directly attributable to the cost units.
4.
Differential cost: It may be defined as the increase or decrease in total cost or the
12.2
Cost Accounting
change in specific elements of cost that result from any variation in operations. It represents
an increase or decrease in total cost resulting out of:
(a) producing or distributing a few more or few less of the products;
(b) a change in the method of production or of distribution;
(c) an addition or deletion of a product or a territory; and
(d) selection of an additional sales channel.
Differential cost, thus includes fixed and semi-variable expenses. It is the difference between
the total costs of two alternatives. It is an adhoc cost determined for the purpose of choosing
between competing alternatives, each with its own combination of income and costs.
5. Incremental cost: It is defined as, the additional costs of a change in the level or nature
of activity. As such for all practical purposes there is no difference between incremental cost
and differential cost. However, from a conceptual point of view, differential cost refers to both
incremental as well as decremental cost. Incremental cost and differential cost calculated from
the same data will be the same. In practice, therefore, generally no distinction is made
between differential cost and incremental cost. One aspect which is worthy to note is that
incremental cost is not the same at all levels. Incremental cost between 50% and 60% level of
output may be different from that which is arrived at between 80% and 90% level of output.
Differential cost or incremental cost analysis deals with both short-term and long-term
problems. This analysis is more useful when various alternatives or various capacity levels are
being considered. (will be discussed in the next chapter i.e. Budgets and Budgetary Control)
6. Contribution: Contribution or the contributory margin is the difference between sales
value and the marginal cost [Contribution (C) = Sales (S) Variable Cost]. It is obtained by
subtracting marginal cost from sales revenue of a given activity. It can also be defined as
excess of sales revenue over the variable cost. The contribution concept is based on the
theory that the profit and fixed expenses of a business is a joint cost which cannot be
equitably apportioned to different segments of the business. In view of this difficulty the
contribution serves as a measure of efficiency of operations of various segments of the
business. The contribution forms a fund for fixed expenses and profit as illustrated below:
Example:
Variable Cost
Contribution
Profit
Since, contribution exceeds fixed cost, the profit is of the magnitude of ` 10,000. Suppose the
fixed cost is ` 40,000 then the position shall be:
Marginal Costing
Contribution Fixed cost = Profit or,
12.3
The amount of ` 10,000 represent extent of loss since the fixed costs are more than the
contribution. At the level of fixed cost of ` 30,000, there shall be no profit and no loss.
7. Key factor: Key factor or Limiting factor is a factor which at a particular time or over a
period limits the activities of an undertaking. It may be the level of demand for the products or
services or it may be the shortage of one or more of the productive resources, e.g., labour
hours, available plant capacity, raw materials availability etc. Examples of Key Factors or
Limiting Factors are:
(a) Shortage of raw material.
(b) Shortage of labour.
(c) Plant capacity available.
(d) Sales capacity available.
(e) Cash availability.
12.2
The technique of marginal costing is based on the distinction between product costs and
period costs. Only the variables costs are regarded as the costs of the products while the fixed
costs are treated as period costs which will be incurred during the period regardless of the
volume of output. The main characteristics of marginal costing are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
All elements of cost are classified into fixed and variable components. Semi-variable
costs are also analyzed into fixed and variable elements.
The marginal or variable costs (as direct material, direct labour and variable factory
overheads) are treated as the cost of product.
Under marginal costing, the value of finished goods and workinprogress is also
comprised only of marginal costs. Variable selling and distribution are excluded for
valuing these inventories. Fixed costs are not considered for valuation of closing stock of
finished goods and closing WIP.
Fixed cost are treated as period costs and is charged to profit and loss account for the
period for which they are incurred.
Prices are determined with reference to marginal costs and contribution margin.
Profitability of departments and products is determined with reference to their
contribution margin.
12.3
12.4
Cost Accounting
making. Marginal costing is used to provide a basis for the interpretation of cost data to measure
the profitability of different products, processes and cost centres in the course of decision making.
It can, therefore, be used in conjunction with the different methods of costing such as job costing,
process costing, etc., or even with other techniques such as standard costing or budgetary control.
Cost Ascertainment: In marginal costing, cost ascertainment is made on the basis of the
nature of cost. It gives consideration to behaviour of costs. In other words, the technique has
developed from a particular conception and expression of the nature and behaviour of costs
and their effect upon the profitability of an undertaking.
Decision making: In the orthodox or total cost method, as opposed to marginal costing
method, the classification of costs is based on functional basis. Under this method the total
cost is the sum total of the cost of direct material, direct labour, direct expenses,
manufacturing overheads, administration overheads, selling and distribution overheads. In this
system, other things being equal, the total cost per unit will remain constant only when the
level of output or mixture is the same from period to period. Since these factors are continually
fluctuating, the actual total cost will vary from one period to another. Thus, it is possible for the
costing department to say one day that an item costs ` 20 and the next day it costs ` 18. This
situation arises because of changes in volume of output and the peculiar behaviour of fixed
expenses included in the total cost. Such fluctuating manufacturing activity, and consequently
the variations in the total cost from period to period or even from day to day, poses a serious
problem to the management in taking sound decisions. Hence, the application of marginal
costing has been given wide recognition in the field of decision making.
Charged to cost
of goods
produced
Charged as
expenses when
goods are sold
Fixed factory
overhead
Charged as
expenses when
incurred
Marginal Costing
Charged to cost
of goods
produced
Direct materials
Direct labour
Variable factory
overhead
Fixed factory
overhead and all
selling and adm.
overhead
12.5
Charged as
expenses when
goods are sold
Charged as
expenses when
incurred
12.4.1 The main points of distinction between marginal costing and absorption
costing are as below:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Marginal costing
Absorption costing
12.6
Cost Accounting
12.4.2 Difference in profit under Marginal and Absorption costing: The above two
approaches will compute the different profit because of the difference in the stock valuation.
This difference is explained as follows in different circumstances.
1.
No opening and closing stock: In this case, profit / loss under absorption and marginal
costing will be equal.
2.
When opening stock is equal to closing stock: In this case, profit / loss under two approaches
will be equal provided the fixed cost element in both the stocks is same amount.
3.
When closing stock is more than opening stock: In other words, when production during a
period is more than sales, then profit as per absorption approach will be more than that
by marginal approach. The reason behind this difference is that a part of fixed overhead
included in closing stock value is carried forward to next accounting period.
4.
When opening stock is more than the closing stock: In other words when production is
less than the sales, profit shown by marginal costing will be more than that shown by
absorption costing. This is because a part of fixed cost from the preceding period is
added to the current years cost of goods sold in the form of opening stock.
12.4.3 Comparison between Direct Costing and Marginal Costing: In general, the
terms marginal costing and direct costing are used as synonymous. However, direct costing
differs from marginal costing in that some fixed costs considered direct are charged to
operations, processes or products, whereas in marginal costing only variable costs are
considered. Marginal costing is mainly concerned with providing of information to management
to assist in decision making and for exercising control. Marginal costing is considered to be a
technique with a broader meaning than direct costing. Marginal costing is also known as
variable costing or out of pocket costing.
In absorption costing, the fixed expenses are distributed over products on absorption
costing basis that is, based on a pre-determined level of output. Since fixed expenses
are constant, such a method of recovery will lead to over or under-recovery of expenses
depending on the actual output being greater or lesser than the estimate used for
recovery. This difficulty will not arise in marginal costing because the contribution is
used as a fund for meeting fixed expenses.
The presentation of information to management under the two costing techniques is as under:
Income Statement (Absorption costing)
(`)
Sales
Production Costs:
XXXXX
Marginal Costing
Add:
12.7
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
Cost of Production
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
Add:
XXXXX
XXXXX
Administration costs
XXXXX
XXXXX
Total Cost
XXXXX
XXXXX
(`)
Sales
XXXXX
Add:
XXXXX
Direct labour
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
12.8
Cost Accounting
Total Variable Cost
Add:
Less:
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
Net Profit
XXXXX
It is evident from the above that under marginal costing technique the contributions of various
products are pooled together and the fixed overheads are met out of such total contribution. The
total contribution is also known as gross margin. The contribution minus fixed expenses yields net
profit. In absorption costing technique cost includes fixed overheads as well.
Illustration 1 (Calculation of profit under marginal costing and absorption costing)
WONDER LTD. manufactures a single product, ZEST. The following figures relate to ZEST for a
one-year period:
Activity Level
Sales and production (units)
Sales
Production costs:
Variable
Fixed
Selling and administration costs:
Variable
Fixed
50%
400
` lakhs
8.00
100%
800
` lakhs
16.00
3.20
1.60
6.40
1.60
1.60
2.40
3.20
2.40
The normal level of activity for the year is 800 units. Fixed costs are incurred evenly throughout the
year, and actual fixed costs are the same as budgeted. There were no stocks of ZEST at the
beginning of the year.
In the first quarter, 220 units were produced and 160 units were sold.
Required:
(a) What would be the fixed production costs absorbed by ZEST if absorption costing is used?
(b) What would be the under/over-recovery of overheads during the period?
(c) What would be the profit using absorption costing?
(d) What would be the profit using marginal costing?
Marginal Costing
12.9
Solution
(a)
(`)
1,60,000
44,000
(`)
40,000
44,000
4,000
(`)
3,20,000
2,84,000
36,000
4,000
40,000
(`)
3,20,000
1,92,000
1,28,000
1,00,000
28,000
12.10
Cost Accounting
Illustration 2 (Reasons for difference in profit under marginal and absorption costing)
XYZ Ltd. has a production capacity of 2,00,000 units per year. Normal capacity utilisation is
reckoned as 90%. Standard variable production costs are `11 per unit. The fixed costs are
`3,60,000 per year. Variable selling costs are `3 per unit and fixed selling costs are `2,70,000
per year. The unit selling price is `20.
In the year just ended on 30th June, 2006, the production was 1,60,000 units and sales were
1,50,000 units. The closing inventory on 30th June was 20,000 units. The actual variable
production costs for the year were ` 35,000 higher than the standard.
(i)
(ii)
Solution:
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
for the year ending 30th June 2006
(`)
Sales (1,50,000 units @ `20)
Production Costs :
Variable (1,60,000 units @ `11)
Add :Increase
Fixed (1,60,000 units @ `2*)
Cost of Goods Produced
Add :Opening stock (10,000 units @ `13)*
30,00,000
17,60,000
35,000
` 21,15,000
20,000 units
Less :Closing stock
1,60,000 units
(`)
17,95,000
3,20,000
21,15,000
1,30,000
22,45,000
2,64,375
19,80,625
40,000
20,20,625
4,50,000
2,70,000
27,40,625
2,59,375
Marginal Costing
12.11
* Working Notes :
1.
2.
Opening stock is 10,000 units, i.e., 1,50,000 units + 20,000 units 1,60,000 units. It is
valued at `13 per unit, i.e., `11 + `2 (Variable + fixed).
Income Statement (Marginal Costing)
for the year ended 30th June, 2006
(`)
Sales (1,50,000 units @ `20)
Variable production cost (1,60,000 units @ `11 + `35,000)
Variable selling cost (1,50,000 units @ `3)
30,00,000
17,95,000
4,50,000
22,45,000
1,10,000
23,55,000
20,000 units
Closing stock
1,60,000 units
(`)
Less :
2,24,375
21,30,625
8,69,375
3,60,000
2,70,000
6,30,000
2,39,375
`
2,59,375
20,000
2,79,375
40,000
2,39,375
Simplified Pricing Policy: The marginal cost remains constant per unit of output
whereas the fixed cost remains constant in total. Since marginal cost per unit is constant
from period to period within a short span of time, firm decisions on pricing policy can be
12.12
Cost Accounting
taken. If fixed cost is included, the unit cost will change from day to day depending upon
the volume of output. This will make decision making task difficult.
2.
3.
Shows Realistic Profit: Advocates of marginal costing argues that under the marginal
costing technique, the stock of finished goods and work-in-progress are carried on
marginal cost basis and the fixed expenses are written off to profit and loss account as
period cost. This shows the true profit of the period.
4.
How much to produce: Marginal costing helps in the preparation of break-even analysis
which shows the effect of increasing or decreasing production activity on the profitability
of the company.
5.
More control over expenditure: Segregation of expenses as fixed and variable helps
the management to exercise control over expenditure. The management can compare
the actual variable expenses with the budgeted variable expenses and take corrective
action through analysis of variances.
6.
Helps in Decision Making: Marginal costing helps the management in taking a number
of business decisions like make or buy, discontinuance of a particular product,
replacement of machines, etc.
7.
Short term profit planning: It helps in short term profit planning by B.E.P charts.
Limitations
1.
2.
Dependence on key factors: Contribution of a product itself is not a guide for optimum
profitability unless it is linked with the key factor.
3.
Scope for Low Profitability: Sales staff may mistake marginal cost for total cost and
sell at a price; which will result in loss or low profits. Hence, sales staff should be
cautioned while giving marginal cost.
4.
5.
Marginal Costing
12.13
assumption that fixed cost will remain static throughout is not correct. Fixed cost may
change from one period to another. For example salaries bill may go up because of
annual increments or due to change in pay rate etc. The variable costs do not remain
constant per unit of output. There may be changes in the prices of raw materials, wage
rates etc. after a certain level of output has been reached due to shortage of material,
shortage of skilled labour, concessions of bulk purchases etc.
6.
Marginal costing ignores time factor and investment: The marginal cost of two jobs
may be the same but the time taken for their completion and the cost of machines used
may differ. The true cost of a job which takes longer time and uses costlier machine
would be higher. This fact is not disclosed by marginal costing.
7.
Understating of W-I-P: Under marginal costing stocks and work in progress are
understated.
1.
Changes in the levels of revenues and costs arise only because of changes in the
number of product (or service) units produced and sold for example, the number of
television sets produced and sold by Sony Corporation or the number of packages
delivered by Overnight Express. The number of output units is the only revenue driver
and the only cost driver. Just as a cost driver is any factor that affects costs, a revenue
driver is a variable, such as volume, that causally affects revenues.
2.
Total costs can be separated into two components; a fixed component that does not vary
with output level and a variable component that changes with respect to output level.
Furthermore, variable costs include both direct variable costs and indirect variable costs
of a product. Similarly, fixed costs include both direct fixed costs and indirect fixed costs
of a product
3.
When represented graphically, the behaviours of total revenues and total costs are linear
(meaning they can be represented as a straight line) in relation to output level within a
relevant range (and time period).
4.
Selling price, variable cost per unit, and total fixed costs (within a relevant range and time
period) are known and constant.
5.
The analysis either covers a single product or assumes that the proportion of different
products when multiple products are sold will remain constant as the level of total units
sold changes
12.14
6.
Cost Accounting
All revenues and costs can be added, subtracted, and compared without taking into account
the time value of money. (Refer to the FM study material for a clear understanding of time
value of money).
Importance
2.
3.
4.
5.
(ii)
12.6.1
between the variable cost and selling price. It tells us that selling price minus variable cost of
the units sold is the contribution towards fixed expenses and profit. If the contribution is equal
to fixed expenses, there will be no profit or loss and if it is less than fixed expenses, loss is
incurred. Since the variable cost varies in direct proportion to output, therefore if the firm does
not produce any unit, the loss will be there to the extent of fixed expenses. These points can
be described with the help of following marginal cost equation: S-V = C = F P
Where,
S = Selling price per unit, V = Variable cost per unit, C Contribution, F = Fixed Cost,
P = Profit/Loss
Marginal Cost Statement
(`)
Sales
xxxx
xxxx
Contribution
xxxx
xxxx
Profit
xxxx
Marginal Costing
12.15
P/V Ratio =
Contribution
Sales
or P/V Ratio =
A higher contribution to sales ratio implies that the rate of growth of contribution is faster than
that of sales. This is because, once the breakeven point is reached, profits shall grow at a
faster rate when compared to a product with a lesser contribution to sales ratio.
By transposition, we have derived the following equations:
(i)
C= S P/V ratio
(ii) S=
C
P / Vratio
12.6.3 Break-Even Analysis: Break-even analysis is a generally used method to study the
CVP analysis. This technique can be explained in two ways:
(i)
In narrow sense it is concerned with computing the break-even point. At this point of
production level and sales there will be no profit and loss i.e. total cost is equal to total
sales revenue.
(ii)
In broad sense this technique is used to determine the possible profit/loss at any given
level of production or sales.
Algebraic computations
(ii)
Graphic presentations
Fixed costs
Contribution per unit
12.16
Cost Accounting
Let us consider an example of a company (ABC Ltd) manufacturing a single product, incurring
variable costs of ` 300 per unit and fixed costs of ` 2, 00,000 per month. If the product sells
for ` 500 per unit, the breakeven point shall be calculated as follows;
Break even point in units =
Fixed costs
Rs` 2,00,000
=
= 1,000 units
Contribution per unit
Rs` 200
Totalfixed cos t
Sales
Contribution
Totalfixedcos t
P / V ratio
12.8.2 Cash Break-even point: When break-even point is calculated only with those fixed
costs which are payable in cash, such a break-even point is known as cash break-even point.
This means that depreciation and other non-cash fixed costs are excluded from the fixed costs
in computing cash break-even point. Its formula is
Cash break even point =
(a) B.E.P
* (Contribution per unit = Sales per unit Variable cost per unit = ` 30 - `15)
(b) Sales to earn a Profit of ` 20,000
= (`1,50,000 + `20,000)/15 X 30
= `1,70,000/15 x 30
= ` 3,40,000 or
PV Ratio =
`1,70,000 `1,70,000
=
= `3,40,000
P / V ratio
50%
Contribution
100
Sales
Marginal Costing
12.17
Material
210000
100%
Labour
150000
80%
Factory Overheads
92000
60%
Administration Expenses
40000
35%
The Indian production will be sold by manufacturers representatives who will receive a
commission of 8% of the sale price. No portion of the Japanese office expenses is to be
allocated to the Indian subsidiary. You are required to
(i) Compute the sale price per bottle to enable the management to realize an estimated 10%
profit on sale proceeds in India.
(ii) Calculate the break-even point in Rupee sales as also in number of bottles for the Indian
subsidiary on the assumption that the sale price is ` 14 per bottle.
Answer
Working Notes (segregation of Cost)
Total
Variable
Fixed
Material
210000
210000
--
Labour
150000
120000
30000
Factory Overheads
92000
55200
36800
Administration Expenses
40000
14000
26000
492000
399200
92800
Total Cost
Solution
(i) Computation of sale price per bottle.
Commission
8% of sales
Profit
10% on sales
Commission including profit 18% on sales
Hence total cost is 82% (100%-18%) of sales
12.18
Cost Accounting
So, sales =
492000
100
82
(ii)
Variable Cost =
6,00,000
40,000
` 600000
` 15
3,99,200
40,000
Fixed Cost
=
Contribution per bottle
=
=
92,800
2.90
= 32,000 bottles
Marginal Costing
= ` 3,75,000
= ` 2,62,500
12.19
= ` 1,12,500
Less: Fixed Cost
=`
90,000
Profit
=`
22,500
100
40
60
`
80
60
20
= (40/20) x 80 = ` 160
Thus, if selling price reduced by 20%, the sales will have to be increased by 60% i.e. from
` 100 to ` 160.
Illustration 8 (Calculation of sales, fixed cost and P/V ratio)
PQR Ltd. has furnished the following data for the two years :
Sales
Profit/Volume Ratio (P/V ratio)
Margin of Safety sales as a % of total sales
2011
2012
` 8,00,000
50%
40%
?
37.5%
21.875%
There has been substantial savings in the fixed cost in the year 2012 due to the restructuring
process. The company could maintain its sales quantity level of 2011 in 2012 by reducing
selling price.
You are required to calculate the following:
(i)
12.20
Cost Accounting
Solution:
In 2011, PV ratio
= 50%
In 2012, sales quantity has not changed. Thus variable cost in 2012 is ` 4,00,000.
In 2012, P/V ratio
= 37.50%
Thus, Variable cost ratio = 100% 37.5% = 62.5%
4,00,000
(i) Thus sales in 2012 =
= `6,40,000
62.5%
At break-even point, fixed costs is equal to contribution.
In 2012, Break-even sales
= 100% 21.875% = 78.125%
(ii) Break-even sales = 6,40,000 78.125% = ` 5,00,000
(iii) Fixed cost
= B.E. sales P/V ratio
= 5,00,000 37.50% = `1,87,500.
Illustration 9 (Calculation of profit and sales)
(`)
(i)
(ii)
2,00,000
Fixed Cost
40,000
BEP
1,60,000
20,000
Profit
10,000
BEP
40,000
Solution:
(i)
(ii)
Marginal Costing
12.21
1,100
1,450
1,200
Sales
Over/(Under)
Budget
(400)
150
(200)
Actual
135
210
330
Profit
Over/(Under)
Budget
(180)
90
(110)
Calculate for each factory and for the company as a whole for the period :
(i)
Solution:
(`000)
P/V ratio =
Sales
1,100
400
1,500
Profit
135
180
315
Diferenece in Profit
315 135
180
=
= 100 =
100 = 45%
Difference in Sales 1,500 1,100
400
(`000)
East : Actual
Less : Over budgeted
Budgeted
90
P/V ratio =
100 = 60%
150
Sales
1,450
150
1,300
Profit
210
90
120
12.22
Cost Accounting
(`000)
Sales
1,200
200
1,400
South : Actual
Add : Under budgeted
Budgeted
Profit
330
110
440
110
100 = 55%
200
P/V ratio =
Fixed Cost
North
East
South
B.E. Sales
North
East
South
Fixed Cost
P/V ratio
360
45%
660
=
60%
330
=
55%
Total
= 800
= 1,100
= 600
2,500
We know that S V = F + P
In first situation :
15 8,000 + 8,000 x = y 40,000
(1)
Marginal Costing
12.23
In second situation :
or,
(2)
(3)
(4)
y = ` 1,20,000
Fixed Cost = ` 1,20,000
P/V ratio =
S V 15 5
200
2
=
100 =
= 66 %.
3
3
S
15
x = 12,000 units.
Suppose sales
Variable cost
Contribution
P/V ratio
Fixed cost
(`)
100
60
40
40%
= ` 80,000
12.24
Cost Accounting
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
or ` 2,00,000
Break-even point = Fixed Cost P/V ratio = 80,000 40%
15% return on ` 2,00,000
30,000
Fixed Cost
80,000
Contribution required
1,10,000
or ` 2,75,000
Sales volume required = ` 1,10,000 40%
Fixed cost even if business is locked up = ` 25,000
or ` 62,500
Minimum sales required to meet this cost: ` 25,000 40%
Mr. X will be better off if the sale is more than ` 62,500.
SV=F+P
By multiplying and dividing L.H.S. by S
S(S V)
= F+P
S
iii.
iv.
v.
BES =
(Q P/V Ratio =
F
P/V Ratio
SV
S
Marginal Costing
vi.
vii.
viii.
ix.
x.
xi.
xii.
12.25
P/V Ratio =
BES
S P/V Ratio = Contribution (Refer to iii)
Contribution
P/V Ratio =
Sales
(BES + MS) P/V Ratio = contribution (Total sales = BES + MS)
(BES P/V Ratio) + (MS P/V Ratio) = F + P
By deducting (BES P/V Ratio) from L.H.S. and F from R.H.S. in x we get :
M.S. P/V Ratio = P
Change in profit
P/V Ratio =
Change in sales
Change in contribution
xiii.
P/V Ratio =
xiv.
Profitability =
xv.
xvi.
Change in sales
Contribution
Key factor
Pr ofit
.
P / V ratio
40,000 Units
` In lakhs
Net Realisation
` In lacs
700
Variable Costs:
Materials
264
Labour
52
Direct expenses
124
440
90
112.50
Total Costs
202.50
642.50
12.26
Cost Accounting
Profit
57.50
Sales
700.00
Calculate:
(i) Profit with 10 percent increase in spelling price with a 10 percent reduction in sales
volume.
(ii) Volume to be achieved to maintain the original profit after a 10 percent rise in material
costs, at the originally budgeted selling price per unit.
Answer
(i) Budgeted selling price = 700 lakhs/ 40000 units = ` 1750 per unit.
Budgeted variable cost = 440 lakhs/ 40000 units = ` 1100 per unit.
Increased selling price = 1750 + 10% = ` 1925 per unit
New volume 40000 10% = 36000 units
Statement of Calculation of Profit
(` In lakhs)
693.00
396.00
Contribution
297.00
202.50
Profit
94.50
(ii) Budgeted Material cost = 264 lakhs/ 40000 units = ` 660 per unit
Increased material cost = 66010% =
726
130
310
1166
1750
Fixedcos ts + Pr ofit
584
Marginal Costing
12.27
Solution:
P/V ratio
S V 10 8
=
= 20%
S
10
Margin of safety
30,000
Profit
= ` 1,50,000
=
20%
P/V ratio
Break-even sales
Total sales
Total variable cost
Current profit
New margin of safety if the sales volume is increased by 7 %.
Solution:
(i)
We know that: Break Even Sales (BES) x P/V Ratio = Fixed Cost
Break Even Sales (BES) x 40% = ` 5,00,000
Break Even Sales (BES) = ` 12,50,000
(ii)
Total Sales
= ` 12,50,000 + 0.375S
S 0.375S
= ` 12,50,000
= ` 20,00,000
12.28
Cost Accounting
Profit
8,000
13,000
` 1,20,000
` 1,40,000
Find out
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
P/V ratio,
B.E. Point,
Profit when sales are `1,80,000,
Sales required earn a profit of `12,000,
Margin of safety in year 2011.
Solution:
Year 2010
Year 2011
Difference
(i)
P/V Ratio =
Sales
` 1,20,000
` 1,40,000
` 20,000
Profit
8,000
13,000
5,000
Difference in profit
5,000
100 =
100 = 25 %
Difference in Sales
20,000
(`)
30,000
8,000
22,000
Marginal Costing
12.29
1.
PV Ratio in 2010
(`)
2.
60
48
Contribution
12
P/V Ratio
No. of units sold in 2010
Break-even point
20%
Margin of safety is 40%. Therefore, break-even sales will be 60% of units sold.
No. of units sold
3.
(`)
6,00,000
3,60,000
2,40,000
52.80
3,78,000
12.30
Cost Accounting
20%
80%
No. of units to be produced and sold in 2011 to earn the same profit
We know that Fixed Cost plus profit =
Contribution
(`)
Profit in 2010
2,40,000
3,78,000
P/V Ratio
(a) If margin of safety is ` 2,40,000 (40% of sales) and P/V ratio is 30% of AB Ltd, calculate
its (1) Break even sales, and (2) Amount of profit on sales of `9,00,000.
(b) X Ltd. has earned a contribution of `2,00,000 and net profit of `1,50,000 of sales of
` 8,00,000. What is its margin of safety?
Solution:
= 2,40,000
100
40
= `6,00,000
Marginal Costing
Fixed cost
12.31
= Contribution Profit
= 1,80,000 72,000 = `1,08,000
Fixed Cost 1,08,000
= `3,60,000
=
30%
P/V ratio
(2) Profit
(b)
P/V ratio
Contribution 2,00,000
= 25%
=
Sales
8,00,000
Margin of safety
1,50,000
Profit
= ` 6,00,000
=
25%
P/V ratio
Alternatively :
Fixed cost
= Contribution Profit
=` 2,00,000 `1,50,000 = ` 50,000
B.E. Point
Margin of Safety
The profit-volume ratio, break-even point and margin of safety for the first half year.
(ii)
Expected sales volume for the second half year assuming that selling price and fixed
expenses remained unchanged during the second half year.
(iii) The break-even point and margin of safety for the whole year.
Solution:
(i)
P/V ratio
Contribution
7,50,000
x 100 =
x 100 = 50%
15,00,000
Sales
12.32
Cost Accounting
Break-even point =
Fixed cost
4,50,000 2
=
= `18,00,000
P/V ratio
50%
Margin of safety =
3,00,000 1,50,000
Profit
= ` 3,00,000.
=
50%
P/V ratio
Item no.
P/V Ratio
(i)
(ii)
Reason
Marginal Costing
(iii)
Will increase
(iv)
Will decrease
(v)
Will increase
(vi)
(vii)
Reasoning 1
(viii)
Will increase
Reasoning 2
(ix)
Will decrease
Reasoning 3
(x)
Will increase
Reasoning 4
12.33
100 90
100
= 10%
110 99
12.34
Cost Accounting
the Y axis whereas the level of activity shall be traced on the X axis. Lines representing (i)
Fixed costs (horizontal line at ` 2,00,000 for ABC Ltd), (ii) Total costs at maximum level of
activity (joined to the Y-axis where the Fixed cost of ` 2,00,000 is marked) and (iii) Revenue at
maximum level of activity (joined to the origin) shall be drawn next.
The breakeven point is that point where the sales revenue line intersects the total cost line.
Other measures like the margin of safety and profit can also be measured from the chart.
The following breakeven chart depicts the different measures:
280
sL
le
Sa
260
ine
240
220
200
it
of
Pr
180
160
a
re
Line
C ost
Total
Angle of
incidence
Margin
of
Safety
140
120
Variable cost
100
80
ea
Ar
ss
o
L
60
40
Margin
of
Safety
20
Fixed cost
0
2
10
12
B.E.sales
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
Actual sales
Marginal Costing
12.35
Using the same example of ABC Ltd as for the conventional chart, the total variable cost for
an output of 1,700 units is 1,700 ` 300 = ` 5,10,000. This point can be joined to the origin
since the variable cost is nil at zero activity.
The contribution can be read as the difference between the sales revenue line and the
variable cost line.
12.12.3 Profit-volume chart: This is also very similar to a breakeven chart. In this chart the
vertical axis represents profits and losses and the horizontal axis is drawn at zero profit or
loss.
In this chart each level of activity is taken into account and profits marked accordingly. The
breakeven point is where this line interacts the horizontal axis. A profit-volume graph for our
example (ABC Ltd) will be as follows,
Loss
12.36
Cost Accounting
The loss at a nil activity level is equal to ` 2,00,000, i.e. the amount of fixed costs. The
second point used to draw the line could be the calculated breakeven point or the calculated
profit for sales of 1,700 units.
Advantages of the profit-volume chart
1.
The biggest advantage of the profit-volume chart is its capability of depicting clearly the
effect on profit and breakeven point of any changes in the variables. The following
example illustrates this characteristic,
Example:
A manufacturing company incurs fixed costs of ` 3,00,000 per annum. It is a single product
company with annual sales budgeted to be 70,000 units at a sales price of ` 300 per unit.
Variable costs are ` 285 per unit.
(i)
Draw a profit volume graph, and use it to determine the breakeven point.
The company is deliberating upon an increase in the selling price of the product to `350
per unit. This shall be required in order to improve the quality of the product. It is
anticipated that despite increase in the selling price the sales volume shall remain
unaffected, however, the fixed costs shall increase to ` 4,50,000 per annum and the
variable costs to ` 330 per unit.
(ii) Draw on the same graph as for part (a) a second profit volume graph and give your
comments.
Solution:
Figure showing changes with a profit-volume chart
Marginal Costing
12.37
(`000)
Contribution 70,000 `(300 285)
Fixed costs
Profit
This point is joined to the loss at zero activity, ` 3,00,000 i.e., the fixed costs.
1050
300
750
(`000)
Contribution 70,000 ` (350 330)
Fixed costs
Profit
This point is joined to the loss at zero activity, ` 4,50,000 i.e., the fixed costs.
1400
450
950
Comments:
It is clear from the graph that there are larger profits available from option (ii). It also shows an
increase in the break-even point from 20,000 units to 22,500 units, however, the increase of 2,500
units may not be considered large in view of the projected sales volume. It is also possible to see
that for sales volumes above 30,000 units the profit achieved will be higher with option (ii). For
sales volumes below 30,000 units option (i) will yield higher profits (or lower losses).
Illustration 22 (Drawing of Break-even chart)
You are given the following data for the year 2007 of Rio Co. Ltd:
Variable cost
Fixed cost
Net profit
Sales
60,000
30,000
10,000
1,00,000
60%
30%
10%
100%
Find out (a) Break-even point, (b) P/V ratio, and (c) Margin of safety. Also draw a break-even
chart showing contribution and profit.
Solution:
P / V ratio =
Fixed Cost
30,000
=
= Rs` 75,000
P/V ratio
40%
Margin of safety = Actual Sales BE point = 1,00,000 75,000 = ` 25,000
Break Even Po int =
12.38
Cost Accounting
Break-even chart
= 40,000 units
Marginal Costing
12.39
200
s
le
Sa
160
e
lin
w
Ne
l
les
sa
ine
line
ost
al c
Tot
120
B.E.P.
80
40
20
40
50
60
80
100
12.14 Summary
Absorption Costing: a method of costing by which all direct cost and applicable overheads
are charged to products or cost centers for finding out the total cost of production. Absorbed
cost includes production cost as well as administrative and other cost.
Break Even Point the level of activity there is neither a profit nor a loss.
Break even point in units =
Fixed costs
Contribution per unit
Cash Break Even Point the level of activity where there is neither a cash profit nor a
cash loss.
Cost Breakeven Point the level of activity where the total cost under two alternatives
are the same. It is also known as Cost indifference point.
12.40
Cost Accounting
Differential Costing a technique used in the preparation of adhoc information in which only
cost and income differences in between alternative courses of action are taken into
consideration.
Direct Costing a principle under which all costs which are directed related are charged
to products, processes, operations or services, of which they form an integral part.
Marginal contribution difference between selling price and variable cost of production.
Marginal Costing a principle whereby variable cost are charged to cost units and fixed cost
attributable to the relevant period is written off in full against contribution for that period.
Profit Volume Chart a diagram showing the expected relationship between costs,
revenue at various volumes with profit being the residual.
Profit Volume ratio the ratio establishing the relationship between the contribution and
the sales value.
Margin of Safety is the difference between the expected level of sales and the break even sales
Projected Sales Break even sales