Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    Writing Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-302122768
    This document provides a rubric to evaluate skills in four areas: depth of reflection, use of textual evidence and historical context, language use, and conventions. For each area, it describes the skills demonstrated at five levels - from a score of 5, where skills are conscious, thorough, insightful, sophisticated, and error-free, to a score of 1 where there is little understanding, unsupported claims, unsuitable language, and errors that make comprehension impossible. Higher scores indicate deeper understanding, stronger examples, more fluent language, and better control of writing conventions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Writing Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-302122768
    43 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric to evaluate skills in four areas: depth of reflection, use of textual evidence and historical context, language use, and conventions. For each area, it describes the skills demonstrated at five levels - from a score of 5, where skills are conscious, thorough, insightful, sophisticated, and error-free, to a score of 1 where there is little understanding, unsupported claims, unsuitable language, and errors that make comprehension impossible. Higher scores indicate deeper understanding, stronger examples, more fluent language, and better control of writing conventions.

    Original Title

    writing rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric to evaluate skills in four areas: depth of reflection, use of textual evidence and historical context, language use, and conventions. For each area, it describes the skills demonstrated at five levels - from a score of 5, where skills are conscious, thorough, insightful, sophisticated, and error-free, to a score of 1 where there is little understanding, unsupported claims, unsuitable language, and errors that make comprehension impossible. Higher scores indicate deeper understanding, stronger examples, more fluent language, and better control of writing conventions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    43 views1 page

    Writing Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-302122768
    This document provides a rubric to evaluate skills in four areas: depth of reflection, use of textual evidence and historical context, language use, and conventions. For each area, it describes the skills demonstrated at five levels - from a score of 5, where skills are conscious, thorough, insightful, sophisticated, and error-free, to a score of 1 where there is little understanding, unsupported claims, unsuitable language, and errors that make comprehension impossible. Higher scores indicate deeper understanding, stronger examples, more fluent language, and better control of writing conventions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Skills

    Depth of Reflection

    Demonstrate a
    conscious and
    thorough
    understanding of the
    writing prompt and
    the subject matter.
    This reflection can
    be used as an
    example for other
    students
    Use specific and
    convincing examples
    from the texts
    studied to support
    claims in your own
    writing, making
    insightful and
    applicable
    connections between
    texts.
    Use stylistically
    sophisticated
    language that is
    precise and
    engaging, with
    notable sense of
    voice, awareness of
    audience and
    purpose, and varied
    sentence structure.
    Demonstrate control
    of the conventions
    with essentially no
    errors, even with
    sophisticated
    language.

    Demonstrate a
    thoughtful
    understanding of the
    writing prompt and
    the subject matter.

    Demonstrate a basic
    understanding of the
    writing prompt and
    the subject matter.

    Demonstrate a
    limited
    understanding of the
    writing pro mpt and
    subject matter. This
    reflection needs
    revision.

    Demonstrate little or
    no understanding of
    the writing pro mpt
    and subject matter.
    This reflection needs
    revision.

    Use relevant
    examples from the
    texts studied to
    support claims in
    your own writing,
    making applicable
    connections between
    texts.

    Use examples from


    the text to support
    most claims in your
    writing with some
    connections made
    between texts.

    Use incomplete or
    vaguely developed
    examples to only
    partially support
    claims with no
    connections made
    between texts.

    No examples from
    the text are used and
    claims made in your
    o wn writing are
    unsupported and
    irrelevant to the topic
    at hand.

    Use language that is


    fluent and original,
    with evident a sense
    of voice, awareness
    of audience and
    purpose, and the
    ability t o vary
    sentence structure.

    Use basic but


    appropriate
    language, with a
    basic sense of voice,
    some awareness of
    audience and
    purpose and some
    attempt to vary
    sentence structure.

    Use language that is


    vague or i mprecise
    for the audience or
    purpose, with little
    sense of voice, and a
    limited awareness of
    how to vary sentence
    structure.

    Use language that is


    unsuitable for the
    audience and
    purpose, with little or
    no awareness of
    sentence structure.

    Demonstrate control
    of the conventions,
    exhibiting occasional
    errors only when
    using sophisticated
    language.

    Demonstrate partial
    control of the
    conventions,
    exhibiting occasional
    errors that do not
    hinder
    comprehension.

    Demonstrate limited
    control of the
    conventions,
    exhibiting frequent
    errors that make
    comprehension
    difficult.

    Demonstrate little or
    no control of the
    conventions, making
    comprehension
    almost impossible.

    Use of textual
    evidence and
    historical context

    Language Use

    Conventions

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy