Silo Design Report-1
Silo Design Report-1
Silo Design Report-1
aVIL ENGINEERING 4
CML ENGINEERING 4M
CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 4
CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 4M
~
ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 4
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUcnON MANAGEMENT 4M
CIVIL ENGINEERING SM
CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SM
3.00pm - 4.30pm
CONVINORo' nil
BoARDo' EXAMINDS:
EXTl.RNAL I.XAMINER:
Professor 0 A Barry
ProfessorH. D. Wricbt
University of fAinoorgh
Designof Silos
1.
On-ground silos
b)
Determinethe design wall loads for the following cylindrical on-ground mild
steel silo. The silo is constructedfrom rolled stnM:turalsteel plate and has a
vertical wall height of 25.0 m and a diameterof 10.0 m. It is ~
to store
alumina,and is concentricallyfilled and discharged.The roof slopesat an angle
of 300to the horizontaland the silo is filled until the solid just touchesthe top of
the vertical wall.
i)
Identify the designvalue of the angleof repose,and the stnICturaldesign
value of the unit weight r
[2]
ii)
Find the Wlit weight that shouldbe usedfor the purposeof detelminingthe
reliablestoragecapacityof the silo, anddeducethis capacity.
[3]
iii) Determine the surface c~ of the wall for which the silo should be
designed.
[2]
iv) Identify the upper and lower values of wall friction angle that should be
used for the design. Deducethe upper and lower characteristicvaluesof
wall friction coefficientJL
[3]
v)
Identify the upperand lower characteristicvaluesof lateral pressureratio ).,
asgiven in the table ofpro petties.
[2]
vi) Identify the upper and lower characteristicvalues of effective internal
friction
vii)
2
viii) f<X'
FCX'd1e
the coOOition
colXlition of maxim\an
maximmn normal sxasma
~
against the silo wall,
lpirm
pI'1
identify the appropriatevaluesof wall friction coefficient, lateral IX'eSSUI'e
ratio and Wtit weight to be used.
[2]
~
againstthe wall It die I8e
11;) Detamine the filling val~ 0f IXJmJaJ
oCtbesilo, igoorina s-tch loads.
[10J
2.
3.
a)
Elevatedsilos1rit~ boppen
Name the two principal modes of solids flow from a silo, and st8te the key
differences between them, with the aid of sketches. An elevated silo with a
hopper can be designed so that the flow of M)1idson diJCblrge is in either of these
two m<MIes
.
[ 8]
ii)
[22]
University of EdinburJb
There are three different failure conditions for the silo wall which must all be
addressed:bursting. axial compressionbuckling and hopper collapse. Each is
critical undera different setof extremevaluesfor the materialproperties.
. For bursting failures, the minimum wall friction with maximwn lateral pressure
ratio mustbe considered.
. For axial compressionbuckling failures, the maximum wall friction with
maximumlateralpressureratio mustbe considered.
in)
Determinethe surfilce class of the wall for which lhe silo .shouldbe
designed
[2]
RolledstnM:tura1 steelplate:Table4.2: Wall categoryis 02
iv)
Identify the upper and lower valuesof wall friction angle lhat should be
ILfedfor the design. Deducethe upper and lower characteristicvaluesof
[3]
0 = 0.466
v)
The uppervalue is quite a lot larger than the value given abovefrom the table. The
lower valueis slightly lower thanthe tablevalue. Thusthe calculatedvaluesrepresent
a wider rangethan the tabulatedvalues. The reasonfor the equationis to permit the
rangeto be detenninedfor solidsnot listed in the table. The smallerrangein the table
also means that more efficient designs can be perfonned for materials whose
propertiesare better known than can be predictedby the equation. The equationis
empiricalandnot a goodrepresentation
of real properties.
vii)
Find the total weightof solid tllat can beplaced hi the silo at the .ftnICtural
designunit weight. and detenninethe height of the effectivesurfaceabove
the base.
{3]
Unit weight for structuraldesign: 12.0kN/m3
Volurnebic capacityof silo = 7t R2 (h + bJ3)- 7t 5.02 (25 + 2.54&'3) - 2030 m3
Design storage capacity
2030 x 12.0 kN
24)62 kN - 2,483
tonnes
For the condition of maximum normal pressures against the silo wall,
identify the appropriate values of wall friction coefficient, lateral pressure
- 0.466 : Upper
Au
= 0.530
I
Nonnal pressureagainstthe wall at the base:
Slendersilo, so 7.3.2 applies
AsymptoticJX'essure
Po = yR/2ti 12.0. 5.0 I (2 . 0.466) 64.4 kPa
5.0/ (2xO.466xO.530) 10.12m
Janssencharacteristicdepth = 7-0- R / (2~)
Depth at which pressureis to be determined(base)z = Height of effective surface
abovebase- 25.85m
0.9222
Pressurecoefficient Cz = 1 - e..Jme = 1- e-fl'.WIO.IZ)
=
0.9222)(64.4
Normal pressureagainstwall just abovehue = Cz x Po
59.37kPa
9
2. Patch loads and dischup
a) All standardsthat define silo pressuresbegin by defining a filling pressureand
then modify it to obtain a dischargepressure. Br~j1y explain why this is, and
indicatethe differencesbetweenfilling and dischargepressures.
[4]
Underconditionsof filling, the pressureregimeis relatively well definedand matches
values given by Janssen'stheory quite well, provided appropriateval~s for the
material properties are used. This is therefore used as the referencecase when
defining silo pressures,and all other pressureconditionsarenonnally referredbackto
this as a basis. However, when dischargebegins, parts of the silo wall may be
ex}X)sedto significant increasesin pressure,though someof thesemay be transient
However.their durationis sufficiently long for them to be classedas static shorttenD
loads rather than dynamic loads, and the flow pressuremultiplier, or flow pressure
factor is usedto attemptto relatethe dischargepressureto the filling pressure.In the
Eurocode,the value of the flow pressuremultiplier dependson the solid being
considered(its angle of internal friction) and the aspectratio of the silo (squat or
slender).
b) 1'18e
Europeansilos loading standardENV 1991-4aho requires silo designsto
include a "patch" pressureto beplaced at any position on the silo wall. Briefly
explain its purpose and thefeatures of real silo pressuresthat it I.sintendedto
j .,
111.
[4J
Underboth filling anddischargeconditions,the pressuresagainstthe walls of silos are
not symmetrical with respectto the silo axis, even under apparentlysymmetrical
conditions. The loss of symmetryis causedby geometricimperfectionsin the silo
walls, andKCidentalasymmetriesin the filling and granularsolidspackingprocesses.
To account for this asymmetryand to ensurethat the structural design has some
margin of safety againstunsymmetricalloads,the E\D'ocodedefinesa patch pressure
that must be added to the filling pressures,and a secondpatch pressuremust be
applied to the dischargepreSS\D'Cs.
Whilst in principle the patch pressuremay act
anywhere,the standarddefinesthe position at which it should act to give the worst
effect.
asfollows: unit weight 8.5 k;NW; ,II = 0.255; .4.= 0.550; internalfriction angle
;; -
280: It has a vertical wall height 18 metres and is concentrically filled level
(flat top surface) to the top of this wall. Discharge is thrmlgh an outlet which is
slightly eccentric to the silo axis, with eo = 1.2 In.
i)
A patch pressure load will be applied to the filling pressures. Locate the
position of the centre of this patch as a depth zp below the surface of the
}lour.
[4J
10
ThusZp
ii)
9.0m
Determinethefilling valueof normalpreuwe againstthewall at thelevel
of thecentreof thepatch,igrlOring
patchj:W'e.f8IIrU.
[4]
- yR/21-L
Janssencharacteristicdepth 70 21.39m
Depthat which pressureis to be evaiulted Zo 9.0m
Pressure
coefficientCz = 1- c'. = 1 e..(9.CV1.1.39)
s 0.3435
Norn18lfilling pressureat heightZp = Cz)( Po = 0.3435)( 100.0
- 34.35kPa
iii)
= 34.35kPa
Nonnal dischargepressureat heightZp.~ = c.x p.,.
Nonnalfilling pressure
at height~ ~
vi)
P-
1 + emax/(2R)
in which en.xis the largerof CIandeo. HereCI 0, but Co 1.2~ soe- = 1.2m.
So P = 1+ 1.2/(2)(6.0) 1.10
11
Thus patch pessure is p,,- 02x P xi"l - 0.2xl.10x46.37-
10.20tPa
The total borimntal force applied by the patch plaS\D'e is Ppc where
Ppc = 1[ s R p,. =1[ x 2.4x 6.0x 10.20= 461.5kN
KsRp,.
vii}
- z - 18m
viii}
If lilt 'MIalJ
I.f ...
-1.SOxI0.20x2.4x18.0-9.0)'6.0)
of 1tGtMc.u
slftl of iI.::.~-==-~
12-. ~
correSINJrwling
wrticaI.rtre.u
due10tIwpchlDIId
...
{5]
{5]
Vertical
- N.sJ1
V mica! ~brane
membranestress
sftSS in
in the
the wall
wall is
is liven
givenby
by ~
, ,=
Nasi'
2
-'
Units: (kN/m)/mm - (N/mm)/mm N/mm: =MPa
~-
-SS.08/12
1M
[2]
- ..S9 MPa
12
3.
Elevated .ilos wit~ lIoppen
a) Namethe two principal modesof solldf flow fro," a Itlo, and .ftatl the by
differetk"Ubetweenthem.with the aid of It.tcllu. All ekUed IUD with a
hoPIWr
CQ1I
bedesigned
sothai tileflow of solidi. 4SlCUp i.rill ""
of tIIt.JI
two1IIodes.
[8]
The ~ ~peI
flow mc:NIes
in silos are Mass Flow and FUlmeIFlow. The key
differencebetweenthem is IS follows. In MassFlow all ~cles of the storedsolid
are in motian when the outlet is o~.
In FunnelFlow, only someof the solid is in
motion: different peuemscan occur in ft8mel flow, with the moving solid IOmetimes
entirely internal to the silo: in other ciICumstances,
the Oowina ~
will spread
outwards from the outlet and reach the wall, above which all material will be in
motion.
O
.
. . 0.1
,
._~
.~~
pi.,..
The DM)(ieof flow can be fOtBMIfrom die chart of flow mode predictions:Fig. 6.2 w
Fig. 1.5:
The hopper is conical so Fig. 6.2c applies.
The wall 6'ictiOI1qie- is I 50.
exhibit MassFlow.
c)
from all.iIIi.-,
Iwu a ~/er
- 8.5 k,N1",J. It
of
is
.u - 0.268).
(I)
o.tet--
WMtMr,. ."""
I.r.rlftpM.tWIow,.
[5J
tm.8>{!:&}
2P11
that is if t8I2OO> (1-O.4S)I(2xO.268)
,... ,.
(fI)
wGll~
..
r8io
Ff .forflU,. co.JlIjONJ
- ~.~~;;;~- (I
+ 0.8xO.268xCQC200)I(1
+ 0.268x~)
to
is steep.
~
(S)
- 0.915
13
..
NI
"..,. flam,.
The nonna1pressureon the wall on filling me (Eq. 7.27)p.
in whichthe~
Pvf
,.
of '"
r N/
(6]
FfPY/
P-1is aivmby
J +. ~t~
~{(~-(fJ}
h
".(rJ
n
n - 2(F~co~+Ff-l)
- D-Il~~-~~
~
2(F~ cotp + Ff- I)
andthetraDSition
verticalstressbaabeengivenin thequestionas Pvft -- 45.2
45.2kPa
kPa
In this ~
the ~
to be ~
areat the top of the oopper.10
X - ~ ~1Ih ~
~~
may IXJtIecoIn~ tb8t Ibis Ie.Is to . coasidcrablesJX)rt
cut in the questicxl:
~ { 1.0-1.0 n} + Pvft1.0n Pvft - 45.2 kPa
Ifx ~ thenPvf = -;;:t
find n -
ia .. IMw- i81i'w81
by(Eq. 8.1S)
TheditcI.-~
Pac- FePw
~Pw
~{(~-(!J} P.I(!J
+
+_a8
IIxt Fe - 1 - 1lint
~2P+e)
.:
{~}
=+-+ sin-'
Onc:eagain,the vertical ~
at the TOP of the hopper~~
to:
Pw=Pvft
However,the val.. of F am mustbe fotmd.
The hopperwall friction is givenby 1.111
- tan .. - tan 1So- 0.261
The intaD81friction angleis +1- 280
14
E -..+
sin-I
1.328
at
the
iMJPPertop, PM
Now
PM-
1.321~S.2
-15+
P. '-
6O.0kPa
8M!
Pw -,.. m
33.46
-48.460
IS
4II)
[8)
1.1
b) A cylindrical on-groundsilo of diameter 12m is madefrom mild steel with a
16
I)
So NvmSd= ..J(NeSd2Ne~xSd
389kN/m
Checkfor 6mm wall: Nv8Rd= 230.6/1.1 = 1254kN/m
So safetymarginagainstburstingis 1254/389 3.23 verysafe!
+ NxSd2)
= (NvmSdfrM)/fy
1.71mm
The silo is built to Fabrication Quality Class B "High quality", and the
proposed wall thickness at z = 12.5 In is t - 8 mm. Ignoring the
strengthening effect of intemaJ presnlFe, determine the safety margin
against a buckling failure, using the partial resistancefactor YM= 1.10. Is
the designadequate?
[16J
230kN/m.
Buckling assessment:
Radius to thickness ratio: R/t = 6(XM)I8- 750
Fabrication quality class is High, so Q = 25
.LI!
Q\Jt =(8.005) ..J(7S0)= 8.76 mID
Characteristicimperfectionamplitude= Wk
Unpressurised
elasticimperfectionreductionfactor a cr(
0.62
~-;:;~;:;
= 161.33MPa
Since 1..>
Kx=aJ~2
1.., .
= (0.195/1.1941-0.137