People vs. Delima
People vs. Delima
Lorenzo Napilon had escaped from the jail where he was serving sentence.
Some days afterwards the policeman Felipe Delima, who was looking for him, found him in the
house of Jorge Alegria, armed with a pointed piece of bamboo in the shape of a lance, and
demanded his surrender. The fugitive answered with a stroke of his lance. The policeman
dodged, it, and to impose his authority fired his revolver, but the bullet did not hit him. The
criminal ran away, without parting with his weapon. These peace officer went after him and fired
again his revolver, this time hitting and killing him.
The policeman was tried and convicted for homicide and sentenced to reclusion temporal and the
accessory penalties. He appeals from that judgment which must be reversed.
issue :whether or not Felipe Delima is liable for the death of Lorenzo Napilon
That killing was done in the performance of a duty. The deceased was under the obligation to
surrender, and had no right, after evading service of his sentence, to commit assault and
disobedience with a weapon in the hand, which compelled the policeman to resort to such an
extreme means, which, although it proved to be fatal, was justified by the circumstances.
Article 8, No. 11, of the Penal Code being considered, Felipe Delima committed no crime, and
he is hereby acquitted with the costs de oficio. So ordered.