Proposal Writing
Proposal Writing
Proposal Writing
Note: Where TDD numbers are not listed, phone numbers in this publication may be
accessed via the State of Illinois TDD relay number: 800/526-0844.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION i
PART V. APPENDICES 28
The purpose of this development guide is to help nonprofit community program developers
and planners with the basic elements and concepts in planning and preparing winning propos-
als for project funding. This guide begins with a pre-proposal section which describes the
initial action to be taken in planning the proposal. The next section provides insight on how
to identify funders and gives tips on preparing an effective proposal. The third section
instructs, step by step, how to organize and write the proposal. Section four discusses
submission of a complete, well-structured budget. Section five addresses the typical items
included in an Appendix to the proposal.
Because of the explosion in information availability on the Internet, the final section, Direc-
tory of Resources, has been revised to include sections devoted to electronic products and
services, Internet search engines and web sites. This section also lists various sources of statis-
tical data, technical assistance resources and documents, sources of government grant program
information, resources to assist in searching for foundation and corporate support, and
newsletters and periodicals.
- Allow community needs to drive the grant-seeking process, rather than visa-versa;
- Have clear and concise understanding of the organization’s purpose, mission, and
goals;
- Engage in systematic planning and program development activities;
- Develop strategic plans for meeting short-range goals, realistically design and activate
strategies for meeting long-term goals; and
- For the most part, do not attempt to develop and implement programs that are clearly
outside the realm of their overall mission.
The grant-seeking organization should carefully consider the many questions which every
funding agency wants answered. Because many funding agencies, particularly foundations, do
ii
not have standard application forms or set formats, these responses should automatically be
incorporated within the body of the proposal. For example, the Chicago Community Trust
and other private and civic groups generally pose such questions as:
iii
Background Information
- How is the organization going to implement and manage the program? Where does
the project fit within the current management and organization structure?
- Is there adequate staffing or will additional or specialized staff be hired to implement
and operate the project?
- What are the qualifications of key staff who will be involved in the project?
Evaluation
- What means will be employed to ensure that the stated needs and corresponding
objectives are met?
- What provisions have been made to evaluate the program? Will project results be
shared with others?
Budget
iv
- How much will the project cost in total, and how much is being requested of the
funding agency?
- Will the requesting organization contribute in-kind or cash to the project?
- Has the organization requested funds from other entities, i.e., government agencies,
foundations, corporations, others? What is the status of each request?
- What consideration has been given to future funding and possible sources of funding?
In seeking funds, the organization should be clear in proposing what it will do. It should ask
for resources to address a critical or pressing need. It should be certain of real community
needs and should consider the existence of established services within a community that carry
out related services.
In reviewing proposals, funders look to see if the ideas presented have been well thought out,
and how the project relates to the overall goals and activities of the organization.
In addition to looking at the project idea itself, funders also look at the organization and the
principals involved with policies and procedures and daily operations. Community involve-
ment in the organization's decision making process is a vital concern to many funders who
look at the composition of the board of directors and advisory committees to gauge active or
passive community input. Funders may routinely inquire if an organization's board or
central committee has approved a proposed project. Some funders have been known to
contact the chairman or members of a board to find out if the directors are aware of the
organization's requests for project funding. Board knowledge and approval are important
elements and of critical concern to funders.
v
PART I. STRATEGIC PLANNING
ASSESSING NEEDS
A proposal is a written expression of, and proposed solution to, a problem. It must present a
persuasive argument for the organization's case. The needs assessment or problem statement
forms the basis for the development of the project and the request for project funding. Thus,
the needs assessment becomes a critical component of a proposal.
For its preliminary research, an organization must collect background facts and data to
support the information presented in this segment of the proposal. A successful proposal
makes it evident that an organization has done its homework.
Proposal reviewers welcome the use of documentation to support the claim or claims asserted
in a needs assessment and problem statement. They do not, however, want to be inundated
with statistical data. Local data that has been collected by area organizations, educational
institutions, local government, or your own organization may be valuable. Colleges, universi-
ties, municipal planning departments and state agencies may have information and data to
verify the need addressed by the project. Several federal agencies also maintain statistical data,
as do many professional organizations.
When presenting statistical information, you should attempt to get data that is specific to the
local area or community to be served by your program or project. Remember that county,
statewide and national statistics can be used for comparative and supportive purposes, but
more specific data will strengthen your statement of need.
Your organization can gather data concerning the target area and population in order to
identify the areas or groups in need of assistance. Statistics can be used to define the number
of persons involved. Empirical information (client surveys, public opinion polls, etc.) can
also be used to exhibit how strongly people feel about any area of concern. The combination
of raw data and public opinion may provide the funder with the best understanding of the
extent of a problem.
There are numerous methods and techniques for determining and analyzing community or
neighborhood needs. Much will depend on the organization's level of expertise, human
resources, fiscal constraints, and time factors. Various methods are used to empirically deter-
mine the types of community needs, including:
Personal Observation: Each of us is familiar with case histories, personal experiences, and
verifiable stories suggesting areas for improvement in a community. Organizations could poll
their board members or advisory council members on the types of problems known to them.
3
Organization staff can provide personal observations, since they are dealing on a day-to-day
basis with clients.
Many organizations hold interagency meetings and attend public hearings. These become
another method of determining people's opinions of local needs. The organization should
document the concerns that are aired, and the solutions which are suggested to remedy the
situation(s). This technique has the advantage of being inexpensive to administer although it
is limited in scope. Increasing the number of persons who provide personal observations will
expand the potential for defining local concerns.
Aggregation of Reports: Organizations often operate "hot lines" and use telephone logs and
intake forms to determine service needs of their clientele. These records, telephone logs and
intake forms reflect the problems and concerns of local residents. By tabulating the client
needs as determined on these reports, an organization can determine the types of problems
that the client has. This method of determining clients' needs can be time consuming, but it is
a more accurate indicator of need than simple personal observation.
A methodical survey can provide invaluable information about community needs. It should
either be random or include all households. Be advised that the first question that will be
asked by the grant reviewer is, “How well does this information represent the target clientele
or area?” If you do not have expertise in conducting a survey, you should work with an
organization which can provide such expertise. Securing assistance from a local college,
university, or government planning department in devising survey questions or providing
other types of technical support may be the best route.
Focus Groups: An alternative is the use of focus groups. This is a way of gauging opinion
from important stakeholders and community interest groups. A focus group interview is a
form of indirect interview used in market research. In a focus group interview, a small group
of stakeholders/customers or any other group of potential representatives of a community
interest group is invited to participate in a spontaneous discussion. The purpose of the
discussion is to reveal the participants’ real feelings about a product, service or a topic/issue
selected. A focus group interview session is usually conducted as a casual discussion with six
to ten participants. The idea is to get input from everybody who participates.
The key to the successful use of this alternative market research technique is a skilled modera-
tor to conduct the simultaneous interviewing of the participants. If you do not have expertise
in conducting these types of interviews, you should work with an organization which can
4
provide you with a skilled moderator. To locate such an individual, ask a local college,
university or market research/advertising firm for a list of persons with the needed expertise.
Developing a demographic and economic data profile for the target area is a good starting
point in assessing needs. Information necessary to complete such a profile can be found
through numerous sources, a few of which are listed in Part VI.
Empirical studies, or research studies conducted by others, will provide an improved aware-
ness of:
Census Bureau or other public data make it possible to identify significant segments, such as:
By comparing significant segments, or the same segment over time, the comparison should be
able to allow for interpretations concerning:
5
Because the information to be gathered on the client base is to be comprehensive, it would be
helpful to develop a checklist to ensure that the most important areas are included for analysis
purposes. A suggested checklist might incorporate the following:
Another important step in the analysis and interpretation process would be to find out what
other experts and program operators are doing about the problem in other communities.
This may be done by developing linkages with local and community agencies that work in the
same field of interest as your agency or organization. Typically these types of linkages are
developed through networking at conferences and professional development sessions. Some
professional associations and organizations are developing online networks, listserves and
chat groups which allow participants to ask questions and post information about their
program challenges and successes.
STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
Once your organization has determined what local situations need action and who and how
people are affected, the organization would be ready to develop various strategies which can
address the identified local problems. Ideas for improvement or innovation of projects should
be thoroughly explored. In this way, an organization will be better prepared to take advan-
tage of the diverse pool of grant programs, many of which are specifically designed for new
ideas.
Identification of Strategies
6
offer initial strategies. The key is to list all ideas that are proposed without regard to their
merit and to discuss the feasibility and/or impracticality of each idea.
Researching Government Projects: There are a great number of projects from state and
federal resources that are tailor-made to address local problems. Staff should investigate the
possibility that a particular government program has available grants to address the local
problem, for example, the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Program for employment
and training, Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Program for emergency food and
shelter, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for economic development
or community services and so on.
Review of Strategies
Once a sufficient number of ideas is presented, key staff then analyze each suggested course
of action in terms of its merit. A strategy format such as the questions below might help
individuals think through the development of a strategy. Areas to consider include available
resources to get the job done, constraints which might affect the strategy, and methods to
neutralize constraints. Each proposal should be tested and weighed to determine its worth in
relation to all other proposals geared to resolving the same issue.
The analysis of strategies cannot be done in absolute terms. There is no system which can
fully determine the value of one course of action over another. Every choice must be
weighed between the need to make services responsive to clients and the need to get outside
contributors to sponsor the course of action.
7
- Is this the easiest or cheapest way to solve the problem?
- What would be easier or cheaper? Where could we cut corners?
- Will the investment which this solution requires be justifiable in terms of the results
expected?
- Has another organization tried this approach? Were they successful?
- Has this been tried by businesses? Other countries? Were they successful?
- Is this kind of strategy consistent with our organization's philosophy?
- Would staff feel at ease working with this strategy?
- Does this strategy duplicate other services?
8
PART II. PREPARING FOR A PROPOSAL REQUEST
PRE-PROPOSAL PREPARATION
When you are preparing a grant proposal, you must clearly describe your ideas and then
direct them in a timely manner to funding agencies that have compatible interests. While this
may be a simple concept, anyone who has completed a grant application knows that it can be
a complicated task which involves a lot of planning and hard work.
Obtaining local support for your project is a big step in marketing it to a funding agency.
The funder will want a demonstration that the consumers and collaborators of a service have
been involved in planning the proposed project. Many grant programs have specific "check-
point" procedures which require sign-offs by relevant local organizations affected by the
proposed project. Discussions should be initiated with these groups and individuals to
explain the project and solicit their support before approaching a funding organization. It is
important then to clear your proposal with all interested parties including:
- Board members;
- Project collaborators;
- Clients;
- Support agencies; and
- Federal regional agency, if applicable.
Effective local publicity campaigns are often overlooked in planning a proposal. Often
misunderstanding and opposition to a program come only from lack of information. Articles
in local newspapers as well as informational releases to key stakeholders will help generate
support. Another very important fact to remember is that proposal reviewers have been
known to call local or community contacts to check out an organization which is requesting
funds, to assure community involvement and support.
Organizations that solicit the support of outside agencies for their project, and obtain support
in the form of written endorsements, should take care to ensure that these support letters are
truly commitments of support. In other words, the organization's and project's credibility
will be damaged if letters attached to the proposal are vague in language or appear to be
“cookie cutter” letters, resulting from your request for their support.
Letters of support should have the following characteristics: be addressed to the agency direc-
tor or board chairman; clearly reflect knowledge of the proposing organization, its work and
track record; demonstrate familiarity with the proposed project; and pledge assistance to the
organization. These letters should be included in a proposal package. While you should
provide the supportive organization with information about the project, encourage them to
9
use your language as the basis to draft their own original letter which clearly expresses their
interest in supporting the project.
10
Possibilities of Renewal
Consideration should be given to the issue of maintaining the project or service after the
initial grant runs it course (usually a period of one to three years). What alternative sources
of funding might pick up the program? You should provide information on any positive
contacts or responses you have secured regarding this issue.
Taking these factors into consideration will give you a good idea on how to go about market-
ing your project idea. With these points in mind, you can take further detailed steps towards
your proposal development.
Getting expert advice also can be very helpful in refining your ideas and in bringing credibility
to your project. Utilize the services of professionals whenever possible. Drawing on their
valuable experience can greatly increase the funds secured by your organization through
grants. The most successful organizations rely on professionals, whether on their own staff
or as outside consultants, such as:
- Professional organizations;
- Fund raising consultants;
- Other program sponsors;
- State technical assistance staff and contacts;
- Local professionals; and/or
- Educational institutions.
Part VI contains a listing of technical assistance resources and guides which may assist you in
preparing for your project.
Foundations and corporations offer funding support in a variety of forms ranging from
grants, loans, and consulting services to matching funds, seed capital and
program-related/corporate responsibility investments. Government agencies offer funding
support in the form of grants, loans, loan guarantees, equity investments, and other, more
innovative methods, for a variety of designated uses. Corporations and foundations often
target their funding in pre-determined topic areas and/or geographic areas. Organizations
must do their homework to know which public and private sector funders to approach for
specific projects.
11
Government agencies generally post solicitations for proposals in the Federal Register. The
exception to this is when a particular grant program has set aside discretionary funds that the
government agency director/secretary can use to fund specific types of projects, e.g., techni-
cal assistance, training, innovative demonstration projects, etc. For the most part, however,
grants are awarded to organizations through an established application process.
The following suggestions should be considered when approaching a government agency for
funding:
Program Status: Research how much has been appropriated by the legislature for the
program during the current fiscal or program year. Find out about the application deadline:
is there one specific date or are applications accepted in cycles, i.e., twice a year, certain
months, etc.? Find out which office or unit within the government agency is responsible for
awarding the program grants.
Eligibility: What are the eligibility requirements for applicants, activities, projects? Compare
these requirements with your proposed project's goals, objectives and activities for compati-
bility. Consider amending those sections as might be appropriate.
Pre-application Process: Find out if there will be pre-applications available prior to the formal
program announcement, and whether a bidders’ conference or briefing will be held. Are
agency staff willing to review your preliminary concept via a meeting or written presentation?
Find out the exact date on which the formal application announcement (Request for Propos-
als or RFP) will be made and what form the announcement will take (mailings from the
agency's mailing list, media announcement, official filing).
Decision-makers: Research who is involved in deciding upon awarding grants; identify the
key individuals by name, location, and telephone number. Who is involved in evaluating
proposal applications?
Decision Factors: What are the factors involved in selecting successful applications -- review
the previous year's awards, look for patterns to determine the types of organizations,
locations, activities, and average grant size, for a better idea of what the grant-making agency
most likely will view favorably.
Application Process: Watch for the formal announcement in the Federal Register and obtain
the official application copy. Compare the official copy with the preliminary copy (if previ-
ously provided). Make sure the application format is followed as specified. If a format is not
provided, use a format such as the one suggested in this booklet that will provide reviewers
with sufficient details about the proposed project and the budget request. Find out if it is
appropriate to contact the agency during the review process in case clarifications are required
or to determine the status of your application in the review process. (Some agencies stop
12
accepting calls one week before the deadline; others will not speak with you on the phone
about the status of your application following the deadline.) Find out the procedure for
notification of successful and unsuccessful applicants. In the case of unsuccessful applicants,
determine if there is a procedure for notifying applicants of the proposal's deficient areas
(correspondence or face-to-face meeting).
13
Approaching Corporations and Foundations
Two places to begin the search for funding are the public library and a Cooperating Collec-
tion of the Foundation Center. Both of these resources include reference directories in their
holdings which identify and list pertinent information on grant-making entities. Illinois
Cooperating Collection locations and information on many such resource directories are
included in Part VI of this booklet.
The following suggestions should be considered when approaching foundations and corpora-
tions with requests for funding:
Understand the Foundation: Learn as much as possible about the corporation or foundation.
Request the foundation's or corporation's annual report to learn about the giving program,
for example:
- Past support;
- Objectives (broad based or specialized);
- Program concentrations -- types of projects the organization will fund;
- Board of directors relationship between the corporate and nonprofit boards;
- Geographical interest (state, regional, cities with corporate facilities);
- Grant application information; and
- Financial data.
Contact the Program Officer: Request the application guidelines from the Program Officer.
This will help you determine your eligibility and the requirements for your submittal.
Be Specific: Tailor information to the company from which you are seeking support. A
specific approach is better than a mass distribution approach.
Be Selective: Select corporations which have plants and employees in your state or city.
Approach the local management first; they will send it to the appropriate contact. A local
recommendation is very important because it will reflect an impact on the community
involved.
Make Your Needs Known: State whether you are seeking general operating or special
project support. The agency may ask for specific amounts in the contribution request.
Be Brief: Some funding sources do not require proposals but prefer proposal letters instead.
The letter request should not be more than two pages in length. Organizations should be able
to sell themselves in the first paragraph. List other corporate funding received (corporations
are always interested in what other businesses are doing). Enclosures should include:
14
- 501(c)(3);
- Proposed budget; and
- Brochures.
Direct Your Correspondence: Research the name of the person who should be contacted.
Do not use "Dear Friend" as a salutation. A letter which is correctly addressed to the contact
person makes the best impact. Don’t assume that the person is a specialist in your particular
field; make sure to limit your use of acronyms and “jargon.” It is appropriate to follow up a
letter with a phone call and make an appointment with the person responsible for contribu-
tions to discuss your program in greater detail.
In addition to the things which your organization should make sure to do in approaching
foundations and corporations, there are several things which should not be done. Some
common grant-seeking errors made by nonprofit organizations are:
Making unrealistic demands: Your proposal should be one which will spark corporate inter-
est. Don't seek too much money for your program from one donor. Expect the corporate
investment to end after one, two or three years.
Expensive packaging of the proposal: Do not spend money on color or elaborate brochures.
The content of the proposal is far more important than the packaging.
Invitations to benefit affairs: Do not use benefit affairs to approach corporations. Such
approaches are very seldom successful.
Mass distribution of the same proposal: Focus on what the corporation is doing -- do not use
a shotgun approach. Research the special interests and official policy line of the group. If
your project serves their purposes, make sure they know it.
Failure to follow up: Follow up on any statements that you will contact them to inquire
about your proposal. It is important to keep communications open at all times.
15
Failure to use your Board of Directors: Use the skills, knowledge and relationships of your
board. Enlist them in your research and grant-writing efforts. Encourage them to be
advocates of your group in their business and social contacts. You never know when a
contact will pay off with a solid funding prospect.
16
SUBMITTAL OF THE PROPOSAL
It cannot be stated often enough that it is essential for an organization to check the guidelines
for each funder carefully, since procedures vary considerably. Determine whether stated
deadlines are postmarked deadlines or “received in office” deadlines. Often proposals are sent
by overnight commercial carriers, so that the sender can verify its receipt by the funder. Be
aware, though, that some federal agencies will honor a postmarked date only if sent by U.S.
mail service. Additionally, some funders will accept faxed or e-mailed submittals; others will
not.
If special application forms must be submitted, make sure you use up-to-date forms. Some
entities now make their application forms available on the Internet. Because most applicants
have computers, many funders will allow you to retype the questions and fill in the answers
on your computer. Others will only accept the completion of their original forms. Once
completed, make sure to send the required number of copies. Some grant programs require as
many as ten copies while others may require only one. Do not exceed the specified page
limit. Some funders will count the pages in your response and tear off (and discard) the pages
which exceed that limit; some will simply throw away proposals that are too long. Addition-
ally, make sure to comply with directions which specify whether text should be printed on
one or both sides of the paper.
In the case of applications for federal funding, be sure to determine if procedures call for the
simultaneous submittal to a state Single Point of Contact (SPOC), then allow for sufficient
time to meet this requirement. In Illinois, the SPOC (also known as the State Clearinghouse)
is housed within the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs, James R.
Thompson Center, 100 West Randolph, Suite 3-400, Chicago IL 60601, 312/814-6028, Fax:
312/814-1800.
It is very important that care be taken in selecting the right grant-making agencies to
approach. No matter how excellent the proposal may be, if it is directed to the wrong
funding agency or submitted at the wrong time, the answer will surely be a rejection. In
selecting the proper funding agencies, the following factors must be taken into consideration.
Current Priorities and Interests of Funding Agencies: You must be fully aware of the priori-
ties and objectives of the funding source's grant program(s). The priorities may change liter-
ally overnight and it is important to keep abreast of the latest directives. Use the telephone to
find out if the funding source has any interest in funding your type of project.
Total Funds Available: Before submitting the proposal, find out the total amount of money
available from the funding agency for your particular project funding category. For example,
grant programs with a total national annual expenditure of $500,000 would be unlikely to
consider a proposal requesting more than $100,000 a year.
17
Size of a Typical Grant: Because of regulations and policies affecting both foundation and
government funding, most have a fairly fixed range of grant costs which they consider.
Pre-proposal inquiries in this area will help ensure that your proposal cost will neither be too
ambitious nor too small.
Nature of a Typical Grant: It may be helpful in identifying viable funding sources to review
titles and/or abstracts of grants previously awarded by a given funder. Often such a review
provides invaluable insight into the subjects and methods most favorably received by funding
agencies.
Percentage of Proposals Approved: Your decision to invest time and resources in a proposal
may be determined by the extent of the competition. Ask the funder for information on the
number of proposals generally received under the project category for which you are apply-
ing and inquire about the usual number of projects approved for the normal funding cycle for
that category.
Matching Funds Required: Both public and private grant programs often carry requirements
that the recipient provide a certain percentage of matching funds. It is important to determine
the amount of matching funds required and whether the match must be provided in cash or
may be provided (in part or whole) as in-kind match. This consideration will be important in
deciding whether a proposal will be prepared and directed to a particular funder.
Payment and Budgeting: Find out how funds will be transferred to your project and the type
of bookkeeping required. For government grants, funds are usually transferred on a cost
reimbursement basis, rather than as up-front, lump sum grants.
The timing of your proposal's arrival at a funding agency is a major factor in receiving project
funds from a specific agency. Federal regional agency or state clearinghouse sign-offs may
impact on a proposal submission timetable, so allot sufficient time for these sign-offs. There
are other factors which should be considered before submitting a proposal. These include
but may not be limited to:
18
- Local government agencies' budgeting dates, if local funds are required for the
program.
It is helpful to know who will be judging your work. This may influence the writing and
even the direction of the proposal.
Cultivate a personal contact with the staff person assigned to review projects in your area of
interest, if possible. Be prepared to make your case immediately. Limit your use of
acronyms and jargon. Also, don't forget to send a thank you note to the person for giving
you the opportunity to present your case.
Track Contacts
Another pertinent suggestion offered by Nike Whitcomb Associates, a Chicago fund raising
consulting firm, is to develop a chart to track all contacts, both written and verbal, made with
various funders. Included in this chart would be the following:
- Name of funding source, address, phone number, contact person, title (with a check
list/dates of contacts and dates to follow up for all of the following items);
- Letter to agency requesting guidelines, other information;
- Letter of inquiry;
- Acceptance/rejection;
- Thank you notes to rejection agencies;
- Appointment letter sent;
- Calls for appointments;
- Appointment dates set;
- Thank you note/appointment follow-up;
- Proposal submitted;
- Back up information submitted with proposal, i.e., 501(c)(3) tax exemption letter,
board listing, audit report, annual report, staff resumes;
- Grant interview (phone/in person);
- On-site visit by grantor;
- Date of decision making;
- Proposal accepted;
- Proposal rejected;
- Thank you note/rejections and acceptance;
- Amount requested; and
- Amount granted.
A simple chart that includes these items will make tracking activities much simpler and lessen
the chances for making glaring oversights or errors. This is especially true if one follows
common advice to line up four prospective funders to contact. Why four? Because,
19
according to many fund raising experts, three out of every four requests for funding are
rejected!
20
PART III. WRITING THE PROPOSAL
Now that your groundwork has been completed, you can proceed with actually writing the
proposal.
Application and proposal forms vary in complexity and depth, from the simple checklist of
fill-in-the-blanks, to the proposal for competitive research grants that will be carefully scruti-
nized by panels of specialists. This primer concentrates on proposal writing for an organiza-
tion where standards are relatively high for design of a project. However, this is an introduc-
tory discussion of major points and not a thorough analysis (which would be extremely
lengthy).
Before you begin to write any of these sections, keep in mind the following rules and tips,
provided by Nike Whitcomb Associates:
- Review the application guidelines, to ensure that you have complied with all
directions, rules and regulations;
- Use simple language, jargon free;
- Avoid using the same words too often; words and phrases which appear too many
times in the proposal, especially acronyms, technical phrases, or “buzzwords” distract
the reviewer;
- Make sure there is a clear relationship between the budget and the project activities;
- Proofread the copy, make sure there are no typographical errors, grammatical errors
or misspellings;
- Read the proposal out loud to hear what you have written, put it aside and read it
again later;
- Give the proposal to a staff person and an outside individual or friend to read for
clarity;
- Verify budget numbers, cross check and double check for accuracy;
- Be sure to attach a copy of the organization's 501(c)(3);
- Include a copy of the board listing with members' names and affiliations;
- Include a copy of the last audit report of your organization;
- Attach resumes, annual report, organization brochures, letters of support, and any
press releases;
- Never use script type, keep paragraphs to six lines or less, use a larger typestyle which
is easy to read;
- Avoid bulky binders;
- Make sure all of the pages are numbered and attachments or appendices are numbered
and clearly labeled; and
- Reread the application guidelines again!
21
No matter what the proposal's organization or final form, proposal writers would be smart to
adhere to the suggestions noted above.
22
An Overview of the Proposal
Every grant proposal should include the information in the following ten key components. If
the program requires you to complete a pre-set form, you should endeavor to place the
substance of the information within the appropriate section, using the headings and subhead-
ings of the form. However, if the program allows you to select your own format, the follow-
ing is a list of the sections (given in sequence) that you can use to structure your proposal:
Cover Letter: On organization letterhead, the cover letter briefly summarizes need, the
proposed program, the organization's qualifications and a small sales pitch.
Title Page: Includes project title, name of applicant, name of agency submitted to, signature,
typed name and title of authorized personnel approving submission and date of approval. If
your proposal is lengthy, keep in mind that some grant reviewers like to see a Table of
Contents page following the Title Page, with tabs on each section within the application, to
enhance user-friendliness.
Summary: Synopsis of project objectives, procedures, evaluation. Try to catch the "flavor"
of the project in approximately 250 words. Remember, this may be the only part reviewers
read in the body of the proposal, and this language may be used verbatim by the reviewer to
describe or explain your application to the board or other internal review/approval entity.
Introduction: Tell what needs to be done and why. Mention the general theory upon which
the project is based. If unique, it should be asserted here. If new or uncommon terms are
used in the proposal, explain their meaning here.
Problem Statement: State why this problem needs to be addressed and provide references to
research, statistics, previous projects or other documentation to support the need for the
project.
Objectives: State the proposed outcome of the project in clearly specified and measurable
terms. Each objective is usually related to (1) a need identified in the introduction section; (2)
activities in the methodology section; and (3) activities in the evaluation section.
Methodology: At this point, you want to describe the problem in terms of the methods you
will use in combating it and why you are choosing this strategy. It is here that specific activi-
ties are described, as well as those action steps that will be used to achieve the objectives.
Evaluation: Provide details on how the organization and the funding source will determine
whether the project has accomplished its objectives. Include the type of evaluation informa-
tion to be collected, how it will be analyzed and a pattern for its dissemination and use. Care
should be taken to strengthen this section and provide evaluation criteria for each objective.
23
Future Orientation: Discuss all topics relevant to the future of the project, whether its
timeframe is limited or if the intent is to continue or expand the project beyond the project
time period. How will continuation be done - what future funding has been lined up?
Budget: State the proposed project costs in a table or spread sheet format. Every item should
be carefully documented. Request as much money as you need to complete the project
adequately (asking for too little money can be as bad as asking for too much). The reviewers
will likely know what is a reasonable amount to conduct the project activities.
Appendices: Include all required support documentation deemed necessary by the funding
source.
One of the ironies of grant planning and writing is that it costs time and money to prepare a
good proposal, yet it is difficult to obtain funds until after the grant is approved. There are a
few foundations and some government grant programs which will provide specific planning
grants. This possibility should be explored. If you already have received a grant, give some
thought to how you can use current resources for planning for the next grant application.
Cover Letter
The first paragraph of the cover letter tells the funding agency who you are and what you do,
preferably in 25 words or less. The next paragraph states the problem to be addressed by
your project. From there the solution or method to address the project is described along
with the total project cost and the requested amount. The last paragraph demonstrates your
excitement for the project and attempts to convince the funding source to provide financial
support for the project. The letter should be signed by your board chairman according to
proper protocol. The executive director should only sign the letter as an "agent" of the
board, with a declaration as such under the director's signature, e.g., "Jean Jones, Executive
Director, for the Board."
Summary
The summary will appear at the beginning of your proposal but should not be written until
after you have completed the proposal. You will then have a clear idea of what is to be
distilled and summarized. A good summary:
24
- Gives dollar figures for the total project cost, and the percentage of funds already
committed, with the amount asked for in the proposal.
Remember: BE SPECIFIC, SIMPLE, AND CLEAR! Keep in mind that the summary is
probably the first thing read by a funding source. As such, you will want to put your best
foot forward and hook the reader into wanting to delve deeper into your written
presentation. So although it may be the last section written, the summary should reflect your
best persuasive argument for funding your project.
25
Introduction
In this section of the proposal, you are introducing your organization to the funding agency.
Here, it is important to show your organization's background, qualifications, and capability
in addressing the stated problem. You want to interest them in finding out more about your
organization's work and motivate them to read further through the proposal. This section
should not only describe how well your organization can handle the problem but also
convince them that you are unique in your ability as compared to another group.
Show your organization's background and credibility in the following aspects but take care
not to bore the reader(s) with an endless recital of your organization's history since its
inception:
Staff: Show that you have staff with experience in the field. Name any experts you may have
working for you. The best documentation of staff expertise is to provide resumes (of reason-
able length) of key staff.
Board: Show that your board of directors is made up of well respected people with diverse
interests. A few community-based organizations may want to consider expanding board
membership to include individuals with backgrounds in law, business, public affairs, and the
like, if current membership is lacking representation in these areas.
Affiliations: List any accreditations or linkages with other organizations involved in the field.
Also inform the funding agency of any licenses you may have obtained in order to provide
the proposed or established service.
Clients: Prove that you have satisfied clients by including written statements or references.
Volunteers: Find out and describe why your volunteers like doing what they do for your
organization.
Facilities: Show how your location benefits your task geographically and demographically.
Past Performance: Describe what your organization has done in the past that will aid it in
reaching its new goal.
Fiscal Responsibility: Show that you have handled budgets successfully in the past.
Prior Funding: Private funding usually leads to public funding. Provide a few examples of
other funders that have shown faith in your capabilities.
Need: Prove, of course, that there is a real need that must be addressed.
Problem Statement
26
This section of your proposal is quite important because it forms the basis for your project's
development. This section describes the problem or situation in your target area that needs
to be addressed and relates it to the overall environment and its impact if not rectified or allevi-
ated. The problem statement relates to your constituency and their needs and not to the
concerns of your agency or organization. Take care not to exaggerate the problem or situa-
tion. You want to convince the funding source that the problems are serious but not insur-
mountable in solving. Funders appreciate the use of statistical and comparative data to
demonstrate the scope of a problem; however, they do not appreciate being overwhelmed
with data. Use local sources of information. Use national data only to the extent that you
are making comparisons of the situation with the national outlook.
To sum up this section, keep in mind that you are describing why your constituency -- not
your organization -- needs assistance. Be specific. In addition, remember:
- You are seeking to address a situation or problem as the result of a condition that exists.
- Develop your research and make sure you know your constituency's desires.
Remember to include statistical and comparative data.
- Know what other experts and program operators are doing. Develop linkages with
outside groups and organizations.
- Never provide more than one option for tackling the problem. The option you pick
should be the final, most optimal solution.
Objectives
Objectives make up the specific components of your overall goal, that which you are
ultimately trying to achieve. Objectives describe the desired end product or situation to exist
at the conclusion of the project. They should be described in terms that are measurable and
quantifiable. They are the traceable and significant connection between the problem descrip-
tion and the actual goods or services provided.
Objectives should be stated using the client's point of view and deal with a terminal nature --
what the clients will look like at the project's conclusion.
Specific objectives serve to focus organizational activity around a common purpose and
provide a benchmark of measuring program achievement. The objectives, if successfully
completed, result in the direct and lasting impact on the problems experienced by clientele.
Consider that objectives generally fall into one of three categories: input, process and impact.
27
Program Inputs: This type of objective identifies the quality or quantity of different resources
judged necessary to complete a program task. Examples of such objectives include: to
increase the number of industrial settings for training programs; to increase cooperation and
coordination of program services; to increase the number of intakes by 5 percent; and to
increase the number who participate in training programs.
Program Process: These objectives state that specified services, treatments, functions or tasks
were accomplished, delivered or performed in specified quantities or qualities. For example,
process objectives might include: the provision of so many units of vocational education
services; a specific number of employment development services provided, one for each eligi-
ble client; or completion of a program recruitment process with a specific number of clients
recruited.
Impact Objective: These objectives state the purpose of the program or state the benefits that
will last after participants leave the program. Examples of impact (sometimes called output)
objectives are: reduce or eliminate dependency; achieve or maintain self-sufficiency; reduce
unemployment; increase the number of workers placed in jobs; and provide an adequate
income in retirement.
Objectives are easily written if one remembers the five essential parts --
What: the nature of the situation to be changed, often signaled by the preposition "to"
followed by an action verb;
Who: the particular group or segment (clients, staff, components), in which or for which
achievement is desired;
Where: the geographic area or that place in which the accomplishment is desired;
When: the target date for completion of the objective or the days or times the objective is
carried out;
What extent: the quality or quantity of the situation to be achieved, a measurement which
can later be used as a basis for evaluation.
Objectives are not to be confused with activities. Activities are the means used to achieve the
objectives. They are your methods. Objectives are also not to be confused with goals. Goals
are identified as statements of the broad purpose of a program and are long range desires or
benefits: objectives are more immediate or short range.
Methodology
28
This section describes the methods (also referred to as strategies, activities, or procedures) to
be employed to accomplish the objectives.
Projects vary most in this area and no universal prescription can be useful. However, the
best proposals will contain:
Design: The basic technique or approach to be used such as a case study, pilot program,
controlled experiment, etc.
Population Recruitment: The projected participants, subjects, or beneficiaries and how they
are selected. Also describe the role they have had in planning for the proposal.
Treatment: Provide sufficient detail about the procedures to be used so the reader can under-
stand thoroughly.
Reporting and Participant Tracking: How information will be collected and who will do it.
Be specific and include copies of any special instruments in the appendix.
Time Schedule: Project an approximate time schedule for carrying out the proposed project.
Charts are often useful here.
Activities are a job or a task requiring both time and resources. Activities state in chronological
order how a strategy is to be accomplished -- in other words, what needs to be done to
achieve the strategies (and therefore objectives). Activities are developed by listing each step
necessary to complete a job. To ensure that each step is listed, one should "backward chain."
Backward chaining is not easy because it requires thinking of each step in reverse order. First,
list the last step which one does to complete a job or objective, then the next to last step and
so on to the step where you are starting. This process of backward chaining will give more
detail than most other methods of listing activities.
Keep in mind that just as objectives flow from the problem statement, so too should the
methodology section flow from the objectives. Including a timetable at the end of this section
would be helpful to the reviewer in analyzing the procession of events. It will also help you
29
to ensure that important details have not been overlooked. However, if charts or graphs are
used make sure they are extremely cogent so as not to detract from the body of the proposal.
Evaluation
How will you know your project is a success? How will you document your project’s
success? The evaluation section of your proposal should provide answers to these questions.
Decision makers generally need evaluations of program success in order to maintain or
modify their program to achieve maximum operating efficiency. In addition, performance
indicators which can be measured before, during and after the end of the program will help
predict the success of the individuals while they are participating in the program, as well as
their post-program success.
The evaluation section is quite important to funders since they want to be able to measure the
progress of programs and determine whether their dollars have been well spent. The inclu-
sion of an evaluation shows that you have an interest in upgrading your project. In
summary, the evaluation section should:
- Describe how data will be collected and progress monitored and analyzed;
- Describe the type(s) of evaluation to be conducted (product and/or process);
- Tell how records will be kept;
- Describe the evaluator: name, title, credentials and extent of impartiality;
- Outline reporting procedures; and
- Provide specific due dates for completing the evaluation.
The product evaluation measures your success in meeting the objectives of your project. Did
you meet the projected and desired statistics of your project? Were your actions indeed
helpful to your clients and are they better off as a result?
While a product evaluation measures the objectives, a process evaluation measures methods
used in working towards the goal. Was the benefit of your actions worth the cost of their
implementation? Were you meeting some higher goal with each step taken?
30
Immediate Post Program Success: Another type of measure is that of immediate post
program success. These measures of performance are based on the experience of a program
as seen primarily from the client's history. Examples of this type of measure include
increased employment or reduced unemployment, increased earnings, increased labor force
participation, increased mobility of the labor force, reduced dependency on the government,
and jobs filled in geographic areas or in occupational classifications. Additional examples of
types of measures used by organizations to determine post program success are:
Program Operating Efficiency: Because some programs are designed to serve a number of
functions for the participant, organizations have developed program operating efficiency
gauges to directly observe project functions and arrive at conclusions about the program's
efficiency. Examples of the measures of program operating efficiency -- how well the
program activity was performed -- include several measures related to workload, some related
to the capacity for work and some related to the mix or complexity of program activities.
Indicative program operations measures may be, for example: increase intake by 5 percent
over the fiscal year to a total of 670,000; and increase the number of tests administered to a
total of 24,400.
31
PART IV. BUDGET
The budget may be the key to your proposal. Your organization is asking for money and
your budget statement is the concrete way to show that you need it. Many funding agencies
complain that they often read through an entire proposal and still are not exactly sure what
the organization needs in terms of money. The requested amount, as previously pointed out,
should be stated explicitly at the beginning of your proposal. Make sure your proposal
supports each item in the budget -- and that it is clear to the reviewers what costs are associ-
ated with each activity. The budget summary and detail justification pages should have the
total project cost, broken out by requested amount (from the funder), organization contribu-
tion and other outside sources (combined). The following budget items should be carefully
documented:
Salaries and Wages: This line item represents expenditures for salaries and wages. Salaries and
wages are defined as fixed payments at regular intervals to professional and clerical staff, and
hourly based payments to part-time and intermittent employees, for services performed. List
each staff position with titles, monthly or weekly salary ranges, number of persons per
position, number of months or weeks to be devoted to the project, percent of time devoted to
the project and total salaries per position.
Fringe Benefits: This line item represents payments other than salaries and wages made to
staff, or paid in their behalf or on their account, as in the form of a pension, vacation, insur-
ance, etc. List fringe benefits for project staff, including FICA, unemployment and workers'
compensation, and hospitalization. Include computation and rate details.
Consultant and Contractual Services: Use for procurement contracts (except those which
belong on other lines such as equipment or supplies), and contracts or other agreements with
secondary recipient organizations such as affiliates, cooperating institutions, delegate agencies,
political subdivisions, etc. Include cost of all consultants. List fees for all legal, accounting
and professional services. Provide specific cost breakouts for each item listed.
Space Costs: This line item represents payments for building and space rent, utilities, janitor-
ial service, general maintenance and repairs, necessary re-arrangements and alterations of facili-
ties which do not materially increase the value or useful life of the facility, and other related
costs necessary to provide adequate space. A cost analysis study may have to be conducted
to determine the amount of rent to be charged to the project if the project is housed within
the organization's own facility. Other more simplified methods may be employed to deter-
mine space costs. In any event, show the amount of space cost per month by the number of
project months to determine total cost or cost per square footage.
Equipment Purchases: This line item represents payments for the purchase of
non-expendable personal property having a useful life of more than one year and a unit
32
acquisition cost of $300-500 or more (depending on the funding agency), payments of costs
associated with the transportation and installation of non-expendable personal property
purchased or to be purchased, and payments made under a lease or rental contract for
non-expendable personal property where an option-to-purchase provision is expected to be
exercised. Check the funding source policy for limitations on equipment purchases first;
many government funders, for example, have specific requirements.
Equipment Rental: List the cost of each office and program equipment item to be rented for
use in the project. Again, check the funding source policy for limitations before including
these items. Specify each item and monthly rental fee.
Consumable Supplies: These items include office and program supplies such as paper, pens,
typing ribbon, folders, etc.
Utilities: The costs for electricity and gas are sometimes broken out separately from space
costs. If no specific budget format is provided you may opt for breaking these items out
under a separate budget category.
Travel: This line item represents payments for transportation, meals and lodging of staff in
accordance with the funder's policy. Check with the funding source for allowable rates for
in-state travel. Check with the funding agency beforehand about out-of-state travel. Project
the total local mileage of each staff person and also specify the purpose of such travel for each
position listed. If out-of-state travel is an allowable expense, specify the purpose of such
travel, i.e., program related activities, training, conferences.
Telecommunications: Included in this line item category are costs associated with installation
and monthly charges for telephone lines, computer phone lines, fax machines, cellular
telephones, pagers and the like.
Program Income: These are direct charges to or fees to participants of the project. Program
income must be kept in a restricted account and either returned to the granting agency or
used to fund direct costs of items needed to expand the quality or quantity of services
provided. With some public funding programs, it can also be carried over into the following
fiscal year. In some programs, funding agencies allow program income to be used as match.
Special Project Costs: These include costs specific to the project. For example, meals served
to children in a recreational program, training manuals, printing original materials and the like.
Show specific cost details for each listed item.
Other Costs: Included in this budget category are such items as office and building mainte-
nance services, postage, repair and maintenance charges for rental equipment, meeting costs,
subscription dues, printing and publication costs, temporary help, and insurance and bonding
costs. Remember to provide specific cost breakouts for each item listed.
33
Overhead/Indirect Costs: Overhead or indirect costs are those additional costs which will be
incurred by an organization that operates multiple programs as a result of taking on this new
project. Also known as administrative costs or “facilities and utilities,” these costs are deter-
mined by charging a fixed percentage, such as 10 to 15 percent, of the total grant request, to
cover such expenses as general and unit personnel and non-personnel costs. Some public and
private funding sources may disallow these charges, so again, check with the funding source
before including this category! This line item represents costs attributed to the program's
administration cost category through application of an indirect cost rate or cost allocation
plan usually required by a government funder. These costs are not to duplicate any costs
charged to the other cost line items in this section. For most government funded programs
indirect costs may not be recovered without an approved cost allotment plan.
Matching Share
In general, matching share represents that portion of project costs that is not borne by the
funding source. For government programs a minimum percentage for matching share is
usually required depending on the program legislation. The following information may be
used as a guide in developing the matching share section of your project budget. Check with
the funder to assure its matching share requirements.
- Charges incurred by the applicant as project costs, but not paid with grant funds;
- Project costs financed with cash contributed or donated to the grantee by other public
and private sources; and
- Project services and borrowed or donated real or personal property, or use thereof,
donated by other public and private sources.
Cash contributions: These represent the grantee's cash outlay including the outlay of money
contributed to the grantee by private organizations, foundations, corporations, individuals,
and other public agencies and institutions (if the grantor happens to be a government funding
source for the project). When authorized by federal legislation, federal funds received from
other grants may be considered as the grantee's cash contribution. Examples of cash match
are:
In-kind contributions: These represent the value of noncash contributions provided by the
grantee and other outside sources. In-kind contributions may be in the form of charges for
real property and nonexpendable personal property and the rental value of goods and
34
services directly benefiting and specifically identifiable to the project or program. Grantees
with government grants may wish to check with the funding source to secure permission to
consider property purchased with government (usually federal) funds as the grantee's in-kind
contribution. Examples of in-kind matching share include:
- Salaries and fringe benefits (of persons not directly paid by program);
- Use of depreciable equipment;
- Value of donated services; and
- Value of office space (with prior grant approval).
Rates for volunteers should be consistent with those paid for similar work in other activities.
In those instances in which the required skills are not found in the grantee organization, rates
should be consistent with those paid for similar work in the labor market in which the
grantee competes for the kind of services involved.
When an employer other than the grantee furnishes the services of an employee, these
services shall be valued at the employee's regular rate of pay (exclusive of fringe benefits and
overhead cost) provided these services are in the same skill for which the employee is
normally paid.
The method used for charging matching share for donated nonexpendable personal property,
buildings and land may differ depending upon the purpose of the grant. If the purpose of the
grant is to furnish equipment, buildings, or land to the grantee or otherwise provide a facility,
the total value of the donated property could potentially be claimed as a matching share.
If the purpose of the grant is to support activities that require the use of equipment, buildings,
or land on a temporary or part-time basis, depreciation or use charges for equipment and
buildings may be made.
The value of donated nonexpendable personal property cannot exceed the fair market value
of equipment and property of the same age and condition at the time of donation. The value
of donated space cannot exceed the fair rental value of comparable space as established by an
independent appraisal. And finally, the value of loaned equipment cannot exceed its fair
rental value.
35
Cash Flow
While developing a project budget, an organization should address the question of cash flow:
Many organizations have faced serious problems because they have overlooked these two
components of cash flow. In few instances will state or federal agencies allow "as needed"
disbursements. (A Letter of Credit from a federal agency would be an exception to this
general rule.) In many cases the state or federal agency only allows vouchers. Organizations
are reimbursed for expenses already paid out because the voucher represents payment for
contracted services. This could be contrasted to foundation or corporate grants where a
specific sum of money is granted per period based on planned project expenditures.
In any case an organization must gauge its actual cash needs for each period (e.g., start up
periods, monthly allotments) and by each project. The organization must also develop and
send out vouchers and disbursements in a timely manner and ensure that both are properly
prepared. Organizations must monitor cash flows in every line item to prevent serious
overruns or idleness of funds.
Finally, your budget section should not be excessively long. A long presentation usually
demonstrates weak or poor organization.
Future Funding
This section shows the funder that you are looking into the future. Discussion should focus
on several areas. Do you anticipate the possibility of a spin-off? In other words, what are the
chances that the project can become free-standing after the funding period? Will you seek
future funding from the same source and/or other sources? What are the implications for the
project's continuation if outside support declines? Can your organization operate the project
without outside funding, and if so, what are the plans to continue on?
What would it cost to operate any given program next year? Organizations would profit by
analyzing past costs in each line item and estimating future cost of each line item considering:
- Inflation;
- Cost of living or other scheduled pay increases;
- Retirement benefits, vacation accrued, other fringes;
- Changes in social security deductions or workers' compensation laws; and
- Changes in rent, insurance, audits, postage, and other normal expenses.
36
PART V. APPENDICES
The items which are often included in the proposal's Appendices have been discussed in
earlier sections of this handbook. To reiterate, those items are:
- Copy of the organization's 501(c)(3) tax exemption letter from the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS);
- List of board members, including addresses, and telephone numbers;
- Copy of the organization's most recent audit report, current financial statement and
current operating budget;
- Copy of the organization's Annual Report;
- Resumes of key project staff to demonstrate qualifications and credentials;
- Letters of support from established community and neighborhood organizations
familiar with the organization's work and credibility;
- News clippings and releases highlighting the organization's most recent achievements
or immediate past accomplishments; and
- Brochures of the organization describing its various programs and activities.
Make sure these items are packaged in a neat and orderly fashion. Nothing can be as frustrat-
ing to a proposal reviewer as to have to search through a disorganized proposal package to
find out if all the required documents have been submitted. A good approach is to number
and clearly label each document or group of material as an individual Appendix, and to refer
to that Appendix by number in the body of the text.
37
PART VI. DIRECTORY OF RESOURCES
There are numerous resources which can assist grant-seekers in researching funding agencies
and writing grant applications. The publications and products listed in this directory are
simply a sample of the types of resources which are available today, and are not meant to
represent a comprehensive listing. Most of the material in this section was taken from promo-
tional material or web sites developed by the publishers. The inclusion of these resources is
not meant to imply or constitute any endorsement or recommendation by the Illinois Depart-
ment of Commerce and Community Affairs.
The hearing impaired may access all phone numbers listed in this publication via the State of
Illinois TDD relay number: 800/526-0844.
U.S. Government Bookstore, One Congress Center, 401 South State Street, Suite
124, Chicago, IL 60605-1225, 312/353-5133, Fax: 312/353-1590.
The Bureau of the Census provides resources which are too numerous to list here,
including specific statistical data on racial and ethnic groups, children, the elderly,
Americans with disabilities, and other groups of people. Information is available at
the census tract, metropolitan area, county, and state and national levels regarding
issues such as household income, child support, poverty, labor force, health insur-
ance coverage, child care arrangements, fertility, geographical mobility, marital
status and living arrangements, school enrollment, and many others.
A few of the Bureau’s publications are listed here. Two can be ordered at the
Bookstore address and phone number listed above:
38
Census Catalog and Guide 1997 (GPO stock number 003-024-08824-0) -- The
Catalog and Guide offers nearly complete coverage of 1990 census products.
Its federal agency section describes statistical products from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, National Center for
Health Statistics, and several other agencies. Most census products are organ-
ized by subject into chapters (such as agriculture, business, foreign trade, etc.),
but a special section combines all references for the 1990 Census of Population
and Housing. It indicates form of product availability, including paper copy,
microfiche, computer tape reel, diskette, compact disc, online and/or fax. It
includes ordering information for all products. Issued 1997, $27.00.
Information for the following documents can be obtained via the Government
Printing Office’s web site at http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs, or via the Bureau’s
web site at http://www.census.gov/. Once at the Bureau’s site, select the “Access
Tools” icon. Then select “1990 Census Lookup” and follow the prompts from
there to assemble the statistics needed from the 1990 summaries.
Population Projections of the United States, by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic
Origin: 1995-2050 (Series P-25, no. 1130, GPO stock number 803-004-00129-7)
-- This presents population projections by age, race, sex and Hispanic origin.
Projections are based on July 1, 1994 estimates, consistent with the 1990
census. Issued 1996.
39
labor force characteristics, journey to work and work experience, as well as
detailed housing data. Issued 1992.
40
¤ Illinois State Data Center Program -- Illinois Bureau of the Budget, 605 Stratton
Office Building, Springfield, IL 62706, 217/782-1381, Fax: 217/524-4876, E-mail:
sebetsch@bob084r1.state.il.us.
The Illinois Bureau of the Budget is the state's lead Data Center, with six Coordinating
Agencies located around the state. Information available from the Data Centers
includes data from the 1980 and 1990 federal Census of Population and Housing; the
1987, 1992 and 1997 federal Economic Census; the federal Bureau of Economic
Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics; and other sources. Some of the Centers
provide information on a cost-reimbursement basis. Coordinating Agency locations
are:
Illinois Dept. of Commerce and Northeastern Illinois Planning
Community Affairs Commission
620 East Adams, 6th Floor 222 South Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1800
Springfield, IL 62701 Chicago, IL 60606
217/785-7545, TDD 800/785-6055 312/454-0400
Fax: 217/524-3701 Fax: 312/454-0411
E-mail: etaft@commerce.state.il.us Web Site: http://www.nipc.cog.il.us
Chicago Area Geographic Regional Research & Development
Information Study (CAGIS) Services
Dept. of Anthropology (M/C 092) Southern Illinois Univ. Edwardsville
University of Illinois - Chicago Campus Box 1456
1007 West Harrison, Room 2102 BSB Edwardsville, IL 62026
Chicago, IL 60607-7138 618/650-3500
312/996-5274 Fax: 618/650-2886
E-mail: sdc@cagis.uic.edu E-mail: ckofron@siue.edu
Web Site: http://www.cagis.uic.edu/ Web Site: http://www.rrds.siue.edu/
Center for Governmental Studies Census and Data User Services
Northern Illinois University Research Services Bldg., Suite A
148 North Third Street 4950 Illinois State University
DeKalb, IL 60115 Normal, IL 61790-4950
815/753-0934 309/438-5946
Fax: 815/753-2305 Fax: 309/438-2898
E-mail: bharger@niu.edu E-mail: cadus@ilstu.edu
Web Site: http://www.cgs.niu.edu/ Web Site: www.socialresearch.ilstu.edu/#cadus
County Profiles -- A separate document for each of Illinois’ 102 counties has
information on the labor force, business establishments, agriculture, and
population characteristics. Projections for key economic variables are included
41
in each profile. Each document is approximately 20 pages. Contact staff at:
217/785-6117, Fax: 217/524-3701, E-mail: jhamilto@commerce.state.il.us.
Dun and Bradstreet -- Information is available on Illinois firms by zip code and
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC). Each entry includes established name,
address, telephone, line of business and SIC, reported sales volume and
employment, the start date of the business, its status (single site, branch,
headquarters, etc.), and a contact name and title. A fee is charged for paper and
disk copies. Contact staff at: 217/782-0527, Fax: 217/524-3701, E-mail:
creynold@commerce.state.il.us.
¤ Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) -- Illinois Center for Health Statistics,
535 West Jefferson, Springfield, IL 62761, 217/785-1064, TDD 800/547-0466, Fax:
217/785-4308, E-mail: mailus@idph.state.il.us, Web Site: http://www.idph.state.il.us/.
42
Annual Report -- This is an overview of DPA's services and programs which
lists, by county, the number of persons/cases on medical assistance. It also
includes fiscal year funding and appropriations charts.
43
¤ Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES) -- Economic Information and
Analysis Division, 401 South State Street, 7 North, Chicago, IL 60605, 312/793-2316,
TDD: 312/793-9350, Fax: 312/793-2192, E-mail: Lmides@aol.com, Web Site:
http://Lmi.ides.state.il.us.
The Economic Information and Analysis (EI&A) Division offers a wide range of
economic and demographic information related to the local, regional, and statewide
labor force. The best way to gain access to the services of EI&A is through its
network of local Labor Market Economists stationed throughout the state.
Names, addresses, and phone numbers for the economists are published in all
EI&A reports and on its web site. Some of the reports you may find most useful
include:
Occupational Projections -- This shows base year and projection year estimates
of employment for all industries and for about 800 occupations, statewide and
for counties or clusters of counties. Average annual openings (vacancies) are
shown by whether they are the result of growth or of replacement needs.
Labor Force and Unemployment Estimates -- Monthly and annual estimates are
available for all towns with populations of 25,000 or more, all counties, and the
state. The series extends for more than ten years. This information is available
on the Internet.
Commuting Patterns -- Using census data, this report shows in- and
out-commuting by county and contiguous states.
Illinois at Work -- This annual report shows six years of employment by indus-
try division for all Illinois counties.
EI&A publishes other reports that also are helpful for proposal and grant writing
and has a wide range of unpublished data on characteristics of IDES applicants,
industrial employment and wages by county, and much more. The local Labor
Market Economists can provide guidance in selecting the most appropriate data to
assist in preparing a grant application.
¤ State of Illinois Universities -- The universities within the State of Illinois have a
wealth of information available for use by community planners and researchers.
Studies and reports compiled by university departments -- political science/public
affairs, economics, business, social science -- may be useful in developing demographic
data sheets for the targeted community or in documenting problems or needs in a
particular community. Several university departments have established centers or
44
bureaus that study, research, and provide technical advice in specific areas or disci-
plines. University libraries also will have many government documents and reports
on file in addition to independent research studies and reports. Many universities also
can provide template agreements and other sample documents, tips on grant writing
and referrals to other appropriate resources for proposal development.
RPCs are regional development organizations which are located in many areas of
Illinois. They assist local governments, businesses, developers and citizens to make
better use of existing public programs. The work of RPCs includes economic
development; regional economic studies on housing, transportation and wages;
water quality and solid waste management planning; administration of local revolv-
ing loan funds; and general governmental technical assistance. RPCs serve as
repositories of census and other data on their respective regions. For information
on the RPC which serves your area of Illinois, contact the Illinois Association of
Regional Councils.
45
312/578-0175 217/206-6633
TDD: 312/578-0159 Fax: 217/206-6208
Fax: 312/578-0158 E-mail: frailey.beverly@uis.edu
E-mail: info@donorsforum.org Web Site: http://www.uis.edu/~library/
Web Site: http://www.donorsforum.org
46
Evanston Public Library Rock Island Public Library
1703 Orrington Avenue 401 19th Street
Evanston, IL 60201 Rock Island, IL 61201
847/866-0305 309/788-7627
Fax: 847/866-0319 Fax: 309/788-6591
E-mail: webmaster@evanston.lib.il.us E-mail: refrip@libby.rbls.lib.il.us
Web Site: http://www.evanston.lib.il.us Web Site: http://www.rbls.lib.il.us/rip/
¤ The Donors Forum of Chicago, 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 740, Chicago, IL
60604, 312/578-0090, Fax: 312/578-0103, E-mail: info@donorsforum.org, Web Site:
http://www.donorsforum.org/.
47
philanthropy and nonprofits in the region, quick telephone reference
assistance, and more.
¤ Grants Link, Inc., 601 West Nifong Blvd., Suite 5B, P.O. Box 10140, Columbia, MO
65205-4002, 800/396-8829, Fax: 573/443-1252, Web Site: http://www.grantslink.com.
48
This organization provides a series of workshops on grantsmanship training,
including Researching Funders, Grant Writing Basics, Researching On The Inter-
net, Writing Government Grants, Self-sustaining Nonprofit, Grant Writing Plus,
and Advanced Grant Writing. The schedule for these courses is published on the
Grants Link web site (www.grantslink.com) and is available through the mail.
49
¤ The Grantsmanship Center, 1125 W. Sixth Street, Fifth Floor, P.O. Box 17220, Los
Angeles, CA 90017, 213/482-9860, Fax: 213/482-9863, E-mail: norton@tgci.com, Web
Site: http://www.tgci.com/.
¤ Applied Social Research Unit, Illinois State University, Campus Box 4950, Normal,
IL 61790-4950, 309/438-7771, Fax: 309/438-2898, Web Site:
http://www.socialresearch.ilstu.edu.
The Applied Social Research Unit (ASRU) of Illinois State University provides
data analysis, needs assessment and program evaluation services to clients including
50
public agencies, communities, educational institutions, nonprofit organizations and
businesses. The ASRU develops survey samples and questionnaires, conducts
focus groups and key informant interviews, does data entry and analysis, and
produces professional reports and presentation materials.
¤ Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Western Illinois University, 518 Stipes Hall,
Macomb, IL 61455, 309/298-1031, Fax: 309/298-2142, E-mail: iira@wiu.edu, Web
Site: http://iira.org.
The Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs (IIRA) works with many local public
agencies on issues relating to economic development, education, health, public
transportation, and public management issues. When agencies apply for grants
and project support, they typically have to justify the needs of the region in which
they work. IIRA has extensive data files available and provides analyses on
request. Help is also available with constructing questionnaires, administering
surveys, tabulating data and preparing reports. Information generated by local data
collection efforts can be processed using Geographic Information System (GIS)
techniques with maps generated of the results. The IIRA webpage contains numer-
ous maps and publications that may be of use to grant writers.
¤ University of Illinois, Center for Urban Economic Development, 400 South Peoria,
Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60607, 312/996-6336, Fax: 312/996-5766.
¤ Capitol Publications, Inc., A Division of Aspen Publishing, Inc., 1101 King Street,
Suite 444, Alexandria, VA 22314, 800/655-5597, Fax: 800/392-7886, Web Site:
http://www.grantscape.com.
51
Winning Federal Grants: A Guide to the Government’s Grant-making Process.
Price: $57.00.
¤ Ellen Dick, 838 Fair Oaks, Oak Park, IL 60302, 708/386-9385, Fax: 708/386-0462.
52
¤ The Foundation Center, 79 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003-3076,
800/424-9836, Fax: 212/807-3677, Web Site: http://www.fdncenter.org/.
¤ Grants Link, Inc., P.O. Box 10140, Columbia, MO 65205-4002, 800/396-8829, Fax:
573/443-1252, Web Site: http://www.grantslink.com.
¤ The Grantsmanship Center, P.O. Box 17220, Los Angeles, CA 90017, 213/482-9860,
Fax: 213/482-9863, Web Site: http://www.tgci.com/publications/puborder.htm.
53
Directory of Internships in Illinois Nonprofit Organizations. First Edition. Price:
$20.00.
54
¤ Oryx Press, P.O. Box 33889, Phoenix, AZ 85067-3889, 800/279-6799 or
602/265-2651, Fax: 800/279-4663 or 602/265-6250, Web Site: www.oryxpress.com/.
From Idea to Funded Project. Jane C. Belcher and Julia M. Jacobsen. 1992.
Price: $26.50
The "How To" Grants Manual. Third Edition. David G. Bauer. 1995. Price:
$29.95.
Proposal Planning and Writing. Second Edition. Lynn E. Miner, et al. 1998.
Price: $29.50.
How to Write a Successful Research Grant Application: A Guide for Social and
Behavioral Scientists. Edited by Willo Pequegnat and Ellen Stover. 1995. Price:
$35.00.
¤ Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) -- One can search the CFDA for key
terms at this web site: http://www.gsa.gov/fdac/queryfdac.htm. (See information on
how to purchase the CFDA on page 44.)
55
This federal government publication describes over 1,300 federal government
programs which provide funds or nonfinancial assistance to state and local govern-
ments, public agencies, organizations, institutions and individuals. Each entry
includes an explanation of the objectives of the program, types of assistance
provided, restrictions, eligibility requirements, financial information, application
and award procedures, names of related programs and other information. The
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance is available in many libraries as a paper
publication and on the Internet.
Organizations can find out about federal grant programs and their most recent
funding announcements and application procedures by reviewing the Federal Regis-
ter. The Federal Register is the official daily publication for rules, proposed rules,
and Notices of Fund Availability (NOFAs) of federal agencies and organizations,
as well as Executive Orders and other Presidential documents. The NOFA will
provide information on an application's due date, information contact, legislation
which established the program, program objectives, allocation and distribution of
funds, eligibility, application process and selection criteria for award of funds. The
Federal Register can be found at many libraries, as well as on the Internet. Via the
Internet, a grant seeker can search for key words which were included in the
Federal Register on a specified day or during a specified year (with the ability to
further focus the search on notices from a certain agency or in a specified topic
area) or browse through the daily copies of the Federal Register.
¤ Flinn Report, Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, 700 Stratton Office Building,
Springfield, IL 62706, 217/785-2254, Fax: 217/785-8998, E-mail: jcar@legis.state.il.us,
Web Site: http://www.legis.state.il.us/commission/jcar_home.html. Price: no charge.
¤ Illinois Administrative Code, Secretary of State Index Department, 111 East Monroe,
Springfield, IL 62756-0001, 217/782-6537.
Final state administrative rules are maintained in the Illinois Administrative Code,
which is available at many public libraries and on CD-ROM from the Secretary of
State Index Department.
¤ State Grant Postings -- For information on some of the current state grant opportuni-
ties, you can subscribe to the designated state newspaper. The State of Illinois desig-
nates a newspaper each fiscal year which is used to post notices of Requests for
Proposals which are being made available by state agencies (be advised that this is not
56
necessarily a comprehensive listing). To secure information about the designated state
newspaper, contact the Illinois Department of Central Management Services (CMS) at
217/782-7343, TDD: 217/782-4600.
At the time of this printing, the State of Illinois has just implemented a new electronic
system for posting bid advertisements, WorldBID. WorldBID contains a complete
listing of state procurement opportunities, and agencies may choose to post their avail-
able grants on this system, as well. For more information on how to subscribe to
WorldBID, visit the CMS web site at http://www.state.il.us/cms/purchase.
57
Sources of Funding Information
¤ Capitol Publications, Inc., A Division of Aspen Publishing, Inc., 1101 King Street,
Suite 444, Alexandria, VA 22314, 800/655-5597, Fax: 800/392-7886, Web Site:
http://www.grantscape.com.
¤ Columbia Books, Inc., 1212 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005.
(No phone orders.) Fax: 202/898-0775. E-mail: cbibooks@worldnet.att.net.
¤ Donors Forum of Chicago, 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 740, Chicago, IL 60604,
312/578-0090, Fax: 312/578-0103, E-mail: info@donorsforum.org, Web Site:
http://www.donorsforum.org/.
¤ Ellen Dick, 838 Fair Oaks, Oak Park, IL 60302, 708/386-9385, Fax: 708/386-0462.
58
¤ The Foundation Center, 79 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003-3076,
800/424-9836, Fax: 212/807-3677, Web Site: http://www.fdncenter.org/.
The Foundation Directory. 1998. Price: $215.00 for hardcover; $185.00 for
softcover.
Guide to U.S. Foundations, Their Trustees, Officers, & Donors. Two Volumes.
1998. Price: $215.00.
The PRI Index: 500 Foundation Charitable Loans and Investments. 1997. Price:
$75.00.
¤ Grants Link, Inc., P.O. Box 10140, Columbia, MO 65205-4002, 800/396-8829, Fax:
573/443-1252, Web Site: http://www.grantslink.com.
59
Corporate Funders Operating in Illinois. Price: $99.00.
60
¤ Oryx Press, P.O. Box 33889, Phoenix, AZ 85067-3889, 800/279-6799 or
602/265-2651, Fax: 800/279-4663 or 602/265-6250, Web Site:
http://www.oryxpress.com/.
¤ Prentice Hall, Order Processing Department, P.O. Box 10871, Des Moines, IA 50336-
0871, Web Site: http://www.phdirect.com.
¤ Reed Reference Publishing Company, P.O. Box 31, New Providence, NJ 07974,
800/521-8110, Fax: 908/665-6688, Web Site: http://www.reedref.com/.
Directory of Corporate Affiliations: 'Who Owns Whom.' 1998. Five volume set.
Price: $1,029.95.
¤ Research Grant Guides, Inc., P.O. Box 1214, Loxahatchee, FL 33470, 561/795-6129,
Fax: 561/795-7794, E-mail: rggfl@aol.com, Web Site: http://www.researchgrant.com.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. 31st Edition. 1997. GPO stock number
922-021-00000-7. Price: $69.00.
61
Corporate Giving Directory 1998. Twentieth Edition. Price: $425.00.
62
Periodicals/Newsletters
Federal Assistance Monitor. Price: $269.00 per year -- published twice monthly.
¤ Capitol Publications, Inc., A Division of Aspen Publishing, Inc., 1101 King Street,
Suite 444, Alexandria, VA 22314, 800/655-5597, Fax: 800/392-7886, Web Site:
http://www.grantscape.com.
Federal Grants & Contracts Weekly. Price: $389.00 for 50 issues per year.
Foundation & Corporate Grants Alert. Price: $297.00 for 12 issues per year.
Exchange News! Price: $65.00 per year (or $50.00 for community-based
nonprofits serving a single community).
63
Local/State Funding Report. Price: $279.00 per year -- weekly subscription.
64
¤ Grants Link, Inc., P.O. Box 10140, Columbia, MO 65205-4002, 800/396-8829, Fax:
573/443-1252, Web Site: http://www.grantslink.com.
¤ The Grantsmanship Center, P.O. Box 17220, Los Angeles, CA 90017, 213/482-9860,
Fax: 213/482-9863, Web Site: http://www.tgci.com/publications/pub.htm.
¤ American Philanthropy Review, 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300, Rancho Santa
Margarita, CA 92688, (714) 589-5938, Fax: (714) 589-4399, Web Site:
http://CharityChannel.com/GuestShare/.
¤ Applied Social Research Unit, Illinois State University, Campus Box 4950, Normal,
IL 61790-4950, 309/438-7771, Fax:: 309/438-2898, Web Site:
http://www.socialresearch.ilstu.edu.
Grant News. Quarterly newsletter published via Web Site. Price: Free.
¤ Capitol Publications, Inc., A Division of Aspen Publishing, Inc., 1101 King Street,
Suite 444, Alexandria, VA 22314, 800/655-5597, Fax: 800/392-7886, Web Site:
http://www.grantscape.com.
65
Grantscape: CFDA. Price: $175.00.
66
GrantWrite: A Step-by-Step System for Writing Grant Proposals That Win. Price
$149.00.
Foundation Center Databases Online via Dialog. For further information about
online access to the Foundation Center's databases through DIALOG, call
DIALOG at 800/334-2564. To learn more about the Center’s databases, call
the Center's DIALOG Support Staff at 212/807-3690.
The Literature of the Nonprofit Sector Online. Free online searchable biblio-
graphic database.
Philanthropy News Digest. Free listserv for weekly electronic online journal.
¤ Grants Link, Inc., P.O. Box 10140, Columbia, MO 65205-4002, 800/396-8829, Fax:
573/443-1252, Web Site: http://www.grantslink.com.
¤ ILLINET Online, Illinois Library Computer Systems Organization, 502 East John
Street, Suite 205, Champaign, IL 61820, 217/244-7593, Fax: 217/244-7596, E-mail:
oncall@listserve.ilcso.uiuc.edu, Web Site to get information about ILCSO:
http://www.ilcso.uiuc.edu, Web Site to connect to ILLINET Online:
http://pac.ilcso.uiuc.edu.
The 45 libraries that are members of the Illinois Library Computer Systems
Organization (ILCSO) use ILLINET Online for circulation and the ILLINET
Online database includes availability information for materials in these ILCSO
libraries.
67
¤ Illinois State Library, Public Services Section, 300 South Second Street, Springfield,
IL 62701-1796, 800/665-5576 or 217/782-7596, TDD 800/965-0748, Fax:
217/524-0041, E-mail: islinfo@library.sos.state.il.us, Web Site:
http://www.library.sos.state.il.us/.
¤ U.S. Fax Watch -- Federal government information is accessible through this easy-to-
use information service sponsored by the Superintendent of Documents. To use the
service, dial 202/512-1716, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, from a touch-tone
telephone or the touch-tone handset of your fax machine. Follow the voice prompts
to request:
Prices, stock numbers and availability status of the 50 Titles (and parts) of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR).
Information about current CD-ROMs and the online GPO Access service. (GPO
Access includes full-text databases for the United States Code, Federal Register,
Congressional Record, and congressional bills. GPO Access also links users with the
Federal Bulletin Board.)
Descriptions of many popular U.S. government information sales items.
Subject listings that categorize 12,000-plus U.S. government information sales items.
Complete information on how to order U.S. government information sales items,
as well as instructions on how to establish a deposit account or standing order.
A listing of the U.S. government bookstore locations.
Addresses and phone numbers of depository libraries by telephone area code.
68
After making your selections, just follow the voice-prompts to enter the number of
your fax machine. The information you request will be faxed to you in a matter of
minutes. Callers are limited to five document requests per call.
U.S. Fax Watch is an information service only. It does not accept orders for sales
items or provide text of actual government documents.
69
Internet Search Engines
Search engines have been called “the card catalogues of the Internet.” They can be used to
search large portions of the Internet for documents which contain your specified key words.
The American Express Client Report (Fall 1997) states, “Each search engine has different rules
for managing the searches and reporting the result.” Therefore, each search engine may
produce different results, even though the same search criteria are used. If your search results
are not satisfactory with one search engine, be sure to try another. Some of the search
engines and their URLs (Uniform Resource Locators, or addresses) on the Internet are:
Web Sites
Numerous organizations and governmental agencies have developed web sites on the Internet
which can provide resources to nonprofits in their grant-seeking endeavors. These web sites
often include many resources, including access to recent grant postings and other news,
online articles, conference announcements, training program descriptions and calendars, grant
deadlines, grant awards and trends, online libraries, listings of publications, software,
listserves, links with other organizations and resources, and site search capabilities. It will be
worth your time to exploring the many aspects of the web sites listed below, for they provide
avenues to more information -- and more up-to-date information -- than can be described in
one informational booklet like this. Some web sites and their URLs on the Internet are:
Private/Organization Sites:
Federal Sites:
71
To request additional copies of this booklet, contact:
72
Notes
73