Graphic Thinking For Architects & Designers
Graphic Thinking For Architects & Designers
Graphic Thinking For Architects & Designers
for Architects
& Designers
TH RD E ITION
Graph·c Thinking
for Architects
& Designers
PAUL ASEAU
10 98 7
Contents •
Acknowled gments ix
CO MMUNICATION
1 Int roduction 1
10 Process 179
6 Analysis 81
7 Exploration 115
v
Foreword
•
au l Las eau p roposes tw o re late d ideas: th e d irect th e ac tions of others and wh o co m m un ica te
vi
Preface to the Third Edition •
w enty years have passed since th e fir st pu bli ind ividual and the org anization . O ne vie w is of ind i
vii
Preface to the First Edition •
n the fall of 1976, while participating in a discus The crea tive architectural space begets crea tivity,
v iii
AcknowLedgments •
h is book is ded icat ed to th ose ar chitects who Karl Brown for comments and other val uab le ass is
ix
)I ~
, ~\ ' . .•'
.1 H .. ·
,r -~
i _ ..
, .... . q ,. .
. -- 10,
"'_ .:;
.~~ \ - :
c ,
\
.... .;.. -: \.
•
•
1 Introduction
rap hic thin king is a te rm I ha ve ad opted to
. .-l
view s on the sam e page. .t .oli\
3 . T he thin king is exp lor a to ry, op en-end ed - the I
sket ches are loose and fr agm ented w h ile sho w ing ', .
how th ey were der iv ed . Ma ny alt erna tiv es for
extend ing th e id eas ar e sugges te d . The sp ecta tor is
invited to parti cipate.
Wh at a m arvelous exa mple! Here is a mi nd in fer
m ent, using draw ings as a m eans of discover y rath er
than as a w ay to imp ress other peop le.
Figure 1-3 By Edwin Lutyens. Castle Drago and British Pavilion
Alt ho ug h it is oft en d iff icult to fi nd reco rds of 1911 Exposition, Rome.
develop m en tal sketch es in hist or ica l documen ts ,
t her e is eno ug h sur v ivin g evide nce to in d ica te th a t tr ain in g m e th od . W it h th e establis hme n t of la rge
th e use of sk etches for th in king w as com m on to arch itec tura l fir ms in the U ni ted States, th ree
ar ch itects thr oughout history. Depe nd ing on th e d ic dimension al scale models gradua lly rep laced d raw
tat es of th e bui ld ing trades or customs, the dr aw ing ing for the purposes of design deve lopment. Th e use
conven tions varied from plan to sec tion to ele vat ion . of de sign ing sk etc h e s furt h er decl ined w ith th e
For alm ost tw o centuries, th e Ecole des Beaux Art s in ad vent of professio na l m ode l makers an d profes
Paris used the plan esquisse as th e found ation for its siona l rende rer s.
1
f ~i
_.. . . .
~
<,
.......--
. ~ '.
. '
..L \ 1 -- \ " I
! --...._----
' "T'" , .
i -~
\ t,.. ..- ..
( " , ~~ --~~ ~. -; / - ,- '
) ,- ~ -I:':" -
~ -
. .. : '
\
~ '
_.
..r ~.r
~-~
r
U
. ' '\ ~_
. ' '" / - -r
j ' - ./ ,
. i'J.' ., :
,
t.~!
,.,
WI' ;p, ,; .
, Ii ) •.- -t ~~~
~7 - .s ~ "
~-T"~ '" ~.
., .
,~\ ej JIJ:i
1.-'\
~'--
_
"' .
i.o--r---:::> 6r>o" 1t" '~
~
\;. .
I
<
~~.!l-:""
~- . -~ . .. -
Figure 1-4 By Alvar Aalto.
~. \fJ!lJiK~-:'1.
ar ch itec ts ' drawings re kindled by exhibits lik e the
Beaux-Arts and 200 Years of Am erican Architectural
. Tt1~~""'~
Dr aw ings. But th e emphasis is mo stl y on com m uni I .
cation of the final fixed product , and these pres enta \
tion drawin gs tell us p ractica lly nothing about the
,"
w ay in w h ich the b uildin gs were designed. The
think in g sketches ar e necess ary to understand the
step -by -step proc es s. Yet ev en when the thinking
sketch es ar e avai la ble , as in the do cuments of the
work of LeCorbusier, they ar e usually overlooked in
favo r of th e renderin gs or photos of the finished
w ork. We ar e ju st beginnin g to appreciate th e impor
tance LeCorb usier pl aced on sketches. As Geoffrey
Broad bent no te s, "All the internal harmony of the
work is in th e drawin gs.. .. It is incredible that artists Figure 1-5 By Th omas Larson. The Grandberg Residence.
today shoul d be in di ffer en t (even ho stile) to th is
prime m over, this' sca ffolding' of th e project. "l
2 Intr oduction
•
ILJI
\.
~~~~
Figu re 1-9 Greek geometry Figure 1-10 ExpLoration map. Figure 1-11 Constellation of sta rs
VISUAL COMMUNICATION THROUGH TIME such as Egyptian hieroglyphics, were hi ghly sp ecial
ized set s of symbols derived fr om p ict ures. Th e devel
Through out his tory, vi sion has h ad an important opmen t of geometry, combining mat hemati cs w ith
imp act on th inki ng. Starting with th e cav em an , dr aw diagram s, m ade it pos sible to think of str ucture and
ings we re a way of "freez ing" ideas and even ts out othe r abstractions of reality. This led"to the const r uc
side of hi m and cr eati ng a history. In m any ways, the tion of objects or buildings of monumental scal e fr om
"second wo rld " man cr ea ted through his images w as desi gn s. In addit ion to tr ying to make se n se of hi s
critical to the evo lution of thinking. Man was able to immediat e surroundin gs, man used d rawings to
separate th e he re an d now fr om what could be imag reach outnto the unknown. Ma ps rec ons tituted
ine d, the fu ture. Through im ages, the world of the from notes and sketches of ex p lore rs spar ked the
spirit , the ideal world of mythology, and compelling im aginati on and s ti m ula te d new d iscoveries about
ut op ias be came immedia te an d real. Th e ideals of an our w orld and th e un ivers e.
entire cult ure could be contained in one pi cture; the
In spite of the asc endance of writt en language,
unsp eakable could be shared with others. Fro m earli
vis ual co m m u nication con tin ue s to be an essenti al
es t tim es, thi s vi su al expression of thinking ha s be en
part of the wa y w e think. This is re ve aled in th ese
commu na l. O n ce a concept , such as the notion of
phrases that liberally sp rinkle our everyday conversa
m an be ing able to fly, wa s converte d to an im age, it
tion : "I see what you m ean ; take anothe r look at the
w as free to be rein ter preted again and again by others
situation ; put this all in pe rspective." Alt h ough
un til the airplane was inven ted.
research opinion varies , it seems gen erally acc ep ted
Ma n used signs and sym bols lon g before w ritten that 70 to 80 p ercent of what w e learn I S thro ugh
la ng uages w ere ado p ted. Early w ritte n langua ges, sigh t. ;:jight seems to be the m ost rapid an d compre-
~~~
he nsiv e of ou r se nse s fo r rec eIv m g in formation. ear, fragm ented bu t sequential way... . Now, the term
T hr oug h cen turies of condi tion ing, w e rely on vision pattern ...w ill ap p ly in creasin gly in un dersta nd ing th e
for a n ea rly wa rn ing of dange r. Not only h av e w e w orld of total -en v ir on m en ta l stim ul i in to which we
co m e to dep end on s ight as a pri m a ry m ea n s of are mo v ing.'? We se ek patte rn s, no t on ly to screen for
understandi ng th e w orl d , bu t we ha ve al so lea rn ed to sign ifica n ce of in for ma tio n , b u t also to illus tr a te
tran sla te in fo rm ati on pi c ked up b y th e senses in to p rocesses or stru ctures by w h ich our world ope ra tes.
visual clu es so tha t , in ma ny w ays, sigh t is actu all y Th e em ergin g tech n ology for collecting, storing, and
us ed as a substi tu te for the oth er senses. d isp layi ng d ifferen t m od els of reality h old s excit ing
p rom ise. Co mpu ter-co ns truc te d sa tellite m aps, video
There is a m ple evidence that vi sual comm u n ica
ga mes, com p ut er gr aphics, and th e mi n iaturiza tion of
tion is becomi ng an eve n m ore powerfu l force in our
com p u ting and re cording eq u ipmen t will open up a
lives. Th e m os t ob vi ous exa m p le is te le v is ion ,
n ew e ra in v isual com m un ication .
thr ough wh ich we ca n exp lore th e sk ies, the oc ea ns,
a n d th e societ ie s of our sh ri n k in g p lan e t. We re ly Th e full use of this new capab ility w ill be directly
heavily on grap hics to ex p lain a n d p er suad e . rel ated to the d evelop ment of our ow n vis ual think
Cartoons have becom e a very sophisticated m ean s of in g. "Com p u te rs ca n no t see or drea m , nor can they
distilling an d reflecti ng our c ultur e. Bu t th e most sig cr ea te : comp u ters are la n guage -bo u n d . Sim ilarly;
n ifica nt re volutio n is the sh ift of visual com m u n ica thinkers w h o ca nnot escape the st ruc ture of la n
tio n from th e realm of specialis ts to that of th e guage , w ho are u naw a re tha t th in k ing ca n occur in
gen eral p u bli c. In st an t ly d eveloping film a nd v id eo ways havin g littl e to do w ith la nguage, a re often ut i
recorders are just th e beg in n ing of th e visual tools that lizing on ly a sma ll part of their bra in tha t is indeed
w ill becom e as com m on as the PC an d the calc u lator. like a comp ut er." Th is observation by Robert McK im
p oints out the critic al issue of man-machi ne in ter ac
The poten tia l of visu a l com m u n ica tion w ill be
tion . T he n ew equ ip m e n t is of no va lue in itself; it is
tested as we be gin th e tw ent y-first ce n tury. Two over
on ly as good as our im agina tion can make it. If we are
riding features are the de luge of inf orma tion th a t w e
to rea lize the potential of visual technology , we must
must absorb and th e increasingly in te rac tive na ture
lea rn to th in k visua lly.
of th e problems we m us t solve . As Edward Hami lto n
p u t it , "Up ...to the prese nt age we h av e ab sor b ed
inf ormation in a one -th ing-at-a-time , an a bs tract, lin -
VISUALTHINKING
Ii,,"·
-. /k,:~,
T his w as a n ew w ay of und erstand ing p er cep tion ,
namely, an int egration of mi nd and sen ses ; th e focu s J ~'h!".. J..{J. .. .._. ,
, ,, L, . ._ .
senses to the in terac tion of bo th. Vis ual th in kin g is ;;." f '" \ ( "...
~-
.
~ i . .~ .-.. . ,
-,' ''''';-- . i. . ,
rt'
.
' -
'if';
..<
' '.,,
-- - -' l.
.:J., ~ ..
-......
i'J . ".
I
"
. '\'I
.'
l' oIO" j
'1 1/,
'
)
.
.
;'
grap hic.
(
.
,.:,.... _ \
.,•, I
\
There ar e stro ng indications that thin kin g in any J oIl.: '\ {
" ":
!
te ct ura l desi gn attem pts to deal w ith our total 1
6 Introduction
~ J
Visual Thinking
I~
\
Figure 1-21 Graphic thin king process.
8 Introduction
I
'\ ','-1
.\ }
' -Y
I
.!'--,
~ ~
~ :;..~ ~
.,.
,.
i\
J~
Figure 1-24 By David Stiegletz. Development sketches on back of a placemat, Siegler Residence.
10 In troduction
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
A st a nd ard story th at m any archit ects del ight in
tell in g de scribes h ow the m ost ba sic co nc ept fo r a
multim illion -doll ar project was first scribbled on the
ba ck of a restauran t na p kin . I have wo nd er ed w hy
both th e telle r and th e listener alw ays se em to derive
a m use me nt from s uc h a sto ry. Perhaps the story
restores confidence in the strength of the ind ividual
de signe r, or m ay be it is the incongruity that de cision s
S ~N 17E:e. ~e lv£R
on suc h im por ta nt matters ar e being made in suc h a
re laxed , cas ua l m ann er. Viewing th is story in the con ArGhrtt.e..t c /il'nt
Ol'$ I ~"'(.Y' A ~ d l e Y\c.e
text of gr aphic thinking, it is not at all sur prising th at
in spired , inven tiv e thi n kin g sho ul d ta ke place at a
resta ura nt tabl e. Not on ly are th e eyes, m inds, and
han ds of at leas t tw o person s interacting with th e
im ages on th e napk in , but als o they ar e further stim
ulated by con versat ion . Besi des , these pe rso ns a re CONl E-XT
separa ted fr om th eir day-to-day wo rk prob lems ; th ey ObJe-d'lV e?1 Lo CCtt IOl'\, flo'V lI'DI)/Io' t n0 11Ml / Clrcuyy,.<;{o.I1 C1'S
0:.;::,.()
i: ~o Q
,.:;.
~ ~ st- > ..'. ~
1.'1 1 ..
j ;~
jii!11
o o
o
Figure 1-27 Gym, St. Mary's College, C. F. Murphy Associates, Figure 1-28 Wall sectio n, Headquarters Building, Smith,
architects . Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc.
THE ROLE OF GRAPHICTHINKING IN their p ur pose is to exp lain to other pe opl e the prod
ARCHITECTURE u ct s of o ur th in kin g, the co n cl us io n s. Tra in in g in
ar ch itectu ral sch ool s h as been primarily gear ed
To realize the pot ential of gra phic th in king in ar chi tow ar d the at ta in ment of finished presen tation skills,
tecture, w e m ust unders tand to day 's prevailing atti whil e in architectural offi ces, th e emphasis has been
tu de s on th e design process and the use of d raw ings on turning out working drawings that clearly pr es ent
in that pro cess. In th e ea rly 1960s, A. S. Levens w as the necessary di rectives for the contractors.
ab le to write w ith conf id ence tha t:
In response to Levens' ana logy, graphic th in king
One source of confusion in thi nkin g ab out design is treats drawings more like a piano than a score sheet.
the tendency to identify design wi th one of its lan Like com position, desig n is poss ib le witho ut an
guages, drawing. T his fallacy is sim ilar to th e confu instrum en t to provid e feedback, bu t for m ost des ign
sion w hich would result if musical composition were ers this is not very produ ct ive. Design thi nking and
to be identi fied w ith the w riting of not es on a sta ff of design comm u nica ti on sh ould be interactive; t his
five lines. Design, lik e m usical composition, is done implies n ew roles for graph ics. As w e anticipate th e
essentially in the m ind an d the making of drawings p oten tial of comp uters and other evol vi ng comm uni
or wri ting of no tes is a recording process. 8 cation te ch nol ogies , the con cept of feedbac k wi ll be
key to effective use of media .
Today, w e hav e broade r conc ep ts of h ow an d
wher e design takes place, bu t drawings are st ill nor
ma lly th ought of as sim ply representations of ideas;
12 Introduction
•
I NDlVl DUAL
IEAM
Figure 1-29
ORGANIZATION OF THE BOOK bu ild ing could get designing started. Distortion of an
eleva tion might re veal a new approach to de tailing.
The first m ajor sec tion of th e book is devo ted to the
Rever sal of a process diagram m ight suggest a mo d ifi
basic grap hic th inking ski lls of repre sen tation and con
ca tio n of the bu ilding program.
ception . Th e section incl udes four chapters dealing
with drawi ng, the use of conventions, abstraction, and Th e third section of the book considers grap hic
expression . My aim is to pro mo te an awareness of the th inking as communi cat ion in three des ign cont exts:
rich variety of graph ic tools availab le for adding pro individual, tea m, and public . The em p hasis is on better
ductivi ty and enjoy me n t to th in king activities. communication so that ideas can be sha red.
Th e se cond sec tio n of th e boo k addresses the Th is boo k is a coll ection of im age s, id eas, and
applicat ion of grap hic thin ki ng to de sign processes. de vices that I hop e a re he lp fu l a nd enjoyable. The
Its four chapters discuss analysis, ex plora tion, discov approach is eclectic ra ther than dis cr imi nating, inclu
ery, and verificat ion . Although there are some obvious sive no t excl usive, expectan t n ot co n clu sive. T he
applicat ions of thes e use s to a n u m ber of design intent is not simpl y to describ e examples bu t to con
pr ocess m odels, I have purposely avo ided promoting vey th e excitem en t of grap hic th ink in g and even
a spec ific design process. O ne of the problems wi th m ake it contagi ou s. We all have sp ecial , uni qu e
design p roce ss models is th eir accept ance in too sim ca p acities for th inkin g, w hich , if un locked , co u ld
plistic a way; types of th ink ing or behavior are cate make grea t contributions to th e solu tion of problems
gor ized, and the int ermeshi ng of processe s and ide as we face. Arn heim emphas izes tha t "Every gre a t art ist
is ignored . Instead of cat egories, we ne ed flex ibility. gives bi rth to a ne w un iverse, in w hi ch the fam iliar
Ma nip u lat ion of gra p hic images, for examp le, might things look th e w ay th ey have n ever before looked to
be used at ma ny stages of de signi ng . I still wo uld not anyone. " 9 Th is book is writ ten in anticipati on of a
attemp t to guess w here it wo uld be ha ndy for a spe tim e when many of us w ill be ab le to give birth to our
cific p roj ect . Man ip ulati on of the ste reotyp es for a own uni verses.
2 Drawing
hiS chapte r's focus is on th e ba sic represen ta The kn owled ge t ha t d raw ing a nd t hin king are
17
•
2 Drawing
his cha p ter' s focus is on the basic represe nta Th e know ledge th at d raw ing and t hi nk ing are
Beca use of th e heavy em p has is on rationa lizati on It is possible to be a n arc hitect w itho u t hav ing
in form al edu cati on, m any peop le mi staken ly think we ll-developed graphic th inkin g sk ills. A barber or a
th at th ey ca n ma ster a skill , such as draw ing, simply bartender can su rely cut hair or serve drin ks wi tho ut
by understandi ng co nc ep ts. Concepts are helpful, but being a ble to car ry on a conversation . Bu t th e job is a
practice is esse ntial. lot eas ier if you enjoy talking wit h people, and you
w ill pr ob ably do more b usines s. I be lieve that grap hic
The orchestra conductor Artie Shaw on ce explained thin kin g can ma ke d esign m ore en joya ble and mo re
why he refused all requests by parents to au dit ion th eir effe ct ive .
child ren. He felt that th e wo rst thing you can do to a
talented child is to tell him he has talent. Th e grea ts in Four ty pes of basic s kills support graphic th ink
the m usic bu siness, regardless of na tural talent , ing: obs ervation, p ercep tion , d iscrim ina tio n , and
became successful th ro ugh hard work and a com m it im agin ation. Alt hough th ese are considered to be p ri
m en t to their craft. They believed in themselves but marily th inking skills, in this chap ter I have tried to
knew the y would have to struggle to prove th em selves sho w how grap h ic me ans may be used to promote
to oth ers. Th e focus of en ergy, se nse of competiti on, th ese sk ills and attain a fund amental int egrat ion of
an d years of hard work are essential to becom ing a fine graphics a nd th inki ng. T he se q uence in whic h the
musician. sk ills a re addressed reflec ts my ass u mption tha t each
thi n king skill supports th ose that follow .
17
1.11~~ \;:J,,~~
' t \?
,
~ ~:;~~
', " i4"-~
tl )
I
;Y J f"
~- If":/ ' ,e ~ II
" .E(f V
~
- ' ~ ':) :,. ;f1 \-.L.~ "~~~ ~~
t ,,~ ,
-r
:>\" ,)
~ .~ =:
" c ' / ,
,
~'
<, -, - ' ,. ' n'l';' _ -:\: '
.@J
L:f,~s ",,--- ~1:t
;> / '0
~G
~/".u .1
who .. .loo k at thi ngs sq ua rel y and wi th recognition
""", ' &C
w ill have an eq u ally .a ler t in ternal ey e. " 2 Visual 6 - ,(,"',)
im agery is cr itica l to the creati ve design er ; he must ~~~
P'1-~
18 D rawing
Figure 2-5 By Karl Mang .
: -_.- -----.-__.-y
/
Figure 2-7 By Patrick D. Nall.
Th e Sketch N otebook 19
Figure 2-8 Spanish Steps, Rome.
OBSE RVATION The clearest way to dem on str ate the valu e of fr ee
hand sketchi ng for develop in g grap hic thinking skills
The thousands of students who pass through archi is to compa re sketchi ng wi th ph otogra phy. Although
tectu ral schoo ls are us ua lly to ld th at they shou ld a cam era is oft en a us eful or expedient too l, it lac ks
learn to sk et ch fr eeha nd and , to a cer tain degr ee, many of the attributes of ske tche s. SKetches have the
how . Rarely are they told w hat they sh ou ld ske tch or ab ility to rev eal our perc ept ion , th erefore giving
w hy. Draw ing cu bes and othe r still-life exercises ar e more im po rtan ce to certain pa rts, wh ereas a photo
an att em p t to teach ske tching d ivorced from th in k shows everything wi th equal em phas is. In the sketch
ing. Mo st st uden ts fin d it bori ng, and it drive s some of the Spanish Steps in Rom e , the focu s is on the
away from sketchi ng for the rest of th ei r lives. I pre ch urc h , ell ipse, and step s as orga n izin g elem en ts for
fer to sta rt students with th e sket ching of exis tin g th e e ntire ext erior space. Th e sign ifican t im pact of
buildi ngs beca use : the flowers in th e p hoto ha s been elim ina ted in the
sketch . The abstra ction can be pushed furt her until
1. The y ar e drawing subjects in wh ich th ey have a there is on ly a pa ttern of light and dark, or we ca n
basic in terest and are re ady to dis cuss. fo cus on ly on certain det a ils, suc h as lamp posts or
2. T he eye an d m in d as well as the hand ar e window s. This on e scen e alo ne is a d ict ion ary of
involved ; percep tion becomes fine-tuned , and we urban design . But you do not have to wa it until you
begin to sor t out our vis ual experiences. get to Rome to get s tarted ; th ere ar e lesso ns a ll
3. On e of th e best ways to learn about archi tectural around us. Becom e a prospec tor of ar chitect ural
design is to look close ly at existin g buildi ngs and design ; build your ow n collec tion of good ideas whil e
spaces. you learn to sket ch . It is a lot of fun.
20 D rawing
Figure 2-9 Spanish
. Steps r Rorne.
Observation 21
?trl-{4 lJY~ I(YM~
{!
IJ
Figure 2-12a House drawing structure. Figure 2-12b Tones.
BUILDING A SKETCH corr ect p rop or tion s it makes n o d iffere nce w hat is
draw n from t he n on; th e sketch w ill alw ays look
In his book D rawing Bu ildings, Richard Dow ner pre w rong. So take your time; look ca refully at th e sub
sen ted the most effecti ve app roach to fr eeh an d ject ; continually compar e your sketch wi th w hat you
sketc hing I have ever com e across . "Th e fi rst an d see. Now add the ton es. The se re presen t the sp ace
m ost importan t th ing ab ou t dra w ing buildi ngs is to defini ng elemen ts of ligh t, shadow, and color. Again ,
realize that what you intend to draw should inter est look carefully at the subject. Where are th e lightest
you as a su bject .'? Nex t , it is im por tan t to select a ton es; where are th e da rkest? The sket ch is becoming
va ntage point th at be st descri bes your subject. Now m ore re a listic. Th e d etail s are ad ded las t . At thi s
you ar e r eady to bu ild the sketch by a three-ste p poin t everyth ing is in its place, a nd you can really
process of sketching basic structure, tones, an d th en concen trat e on th e details one at a tim e. It is no
det ails. The basic st ructure sketch is most important. lon ger ove rw helming; you can re lax and enjoy it.
If the p arts ar e not show n in their proper p lace and
Fi gure 2-13a Bowl drawing structure. Figure 2-13b Tones. Figure 2-13c Finished bowl drawing.
22 D rawing
Figure 2-12c Text ure and color.
Building a Sk etch 23
IZJ D
L7k1
\ 1
Figure 2-17
Structure Sketch
T he most im port an t part of a sketch , the basic lin e
draw ing, is also the mo st d ifficult skill to m as te r. It
Figure 2-14 re quires a lot of practice, but I have a few suggestions
th at sho uld help :
1. To help sha rp en th e se ns e of propo rtion need ed
for ske tching , practi ce dr aw ing squares and th en rec
tangles that are tw o or th ree times longer on one side
th an on th e other. Now try to find squares in a scene
yo u are ske tchi ng . (At th e beginn in g, th is co uld be
don e w ith tracing pap er over a photograp h.)
2. Use a cross or a fra m e to get th e parts of th e
sk etch in th eir prop er p lace, or maybe a p romi ne nt
fea tur e of the scene or subjec t can act as an organizer
for the ot her parts of the sketch .
3. ·Alth ough pen cil ca n certai n ly be us ed for
sk etchi ng, I pref er fe lt -tip or in k pens b eca use the
lines they prod uc e are simple and clear. If a line is in
th e wrong place, it is qu ite ev ide n t. Because the lin e
can not be eras ed , it m ust be redr aw n to get it right.
This proc ess of rep et ition and checking against t he
Fig ure 2-15 subjec t develops ski ll. Drawings th at are so light they
ca n be ign ored or erased den y the design er the feed
back essen tia l to his im pro vem ent.
4. To gai n mor e co nt r ol ov er line m a king, try
so me sim ple exercises sim ilar to our "id le m om ent "
doodl es . Th e sp irals, like tho se above , are d rawn
fr om the ou ts id e toward the cen te r, both clockw ise
and co unte rclockw ise . Try to m ake them as fas t as
p ossib le without let tin g the lines touc h each ot her ;
tr y to get th e lines close to each othe r. Stra ight hatch
in g can be done in several directi ons , always striv ing
Fi gure 2-16 for consistency.
24 Dra wing
Fi gure 2- 18 Figure 2-1 9
Figure 2- 20
Bu ilding a Sketch 25
= ==
-
ififf
~I ~I
r
~ ')!! .~~
../
~u[1fj
0000
L..J l--J
L.....-..> '--.J
1=
~
~
·,.j71iii~~~~;)
~11i/W WJ&il. ~
Details
Detai ls a re ofte n the most in terestin g or compe lling
as pe ct of buildings. T he window is an exce lle n t exam
p le. T her e, the de ta ils ca n be th e result of a tr an siti on
be tw een tw o m a ter ial s-brick and glass- or b etween
two b u ild ing elements-wall and op e ning. The w ood
w indow frame , brick arch , key stone, and w indowsi ll
ma ke t hese transi tio ns po ss ib le , an d each of th ese
de tai ls tells us more abou t th e b ui lding . O n a regular
basis, I have students sk etch window s, doors, or
other bu ild ing elemen ts so they ga in an unde rstand
ing a nd appre ciat ion of the con tribution of detai ls to
th e q uali ti es and func tions of the bui lding . Details
tell us so m e thi ng of need s a nd ma ter ia ls as w ell as
our in ge n uit y in re lating th em . Th e ske tc h of the
me ta l grating around th e b ase of t h e tree exp la ins
bot h the need s of the tr ee and the use of th e su rfa ce
under the tree where people w alk .
Figure 2-23
In m ost arc h it ectural sce nes, th ere a re d et a ils
close to us a n d othe rs fa rth er away. We can see m or e
of th e close det ail and sho u ld sho w in th e ske tc h suc h
things as sc re w s or fas te ne rs or fin e joints a n d tex
tur es. As d etai ls recede in th e sk et ch , few er a n d
few er of the pi eces ar e sho w n , unt il on ly th e ou tline
is v isib le.
26 Drawing
Figure 2-25 MO lltgomery, Alabama.
Combining Observations
Wit h practice , struc ture , ton es, a nd d etai ls ca n be
effective ly combined to ca p ture th e com p le te se nse
of a subject. Old er houses of d ifferent sty les ar e suit
ab le su bj ects for practicin g a nd developing ob ser va
tion sk ills. T he y a re usua lly readi ly access ib le and
p ro v ide a varie ty o f v is u a l effect s th a t ca n sus ta in
yo ur in te rest. Try vis iting favorit e houses at d iffer ent
tim es of d ay in orde r to v iew the impact of di ffer ent
light ing co n d itions. Walk arou n d , approa ch , a nd
re tr ea t fr om th e su bj ect to captur e a va r ie ty o f
Fi gure 2-24 Sail Francisco. Ca lifornia. appearances .
Building a Sketch 27
TRACING
o
01 1'0 0
sh owing th e ele men ts that need to be corrected and
then, in anothe r overlay, ma ke a w hol e new ske tc h
incorpor ating th e ch an ges. You w ill learn more from
yo ur mi stak es, and th e fina l sketc h w ill be better an d
fresher. Tracing can also be do ne by lay ing a tran s
Figure 2-26a Orig inal sketc h. pare n t s hee t with a grid ov er a draw ing or p ho to,
draw ing a larger gr id, and th en transferring the draw
in g square by sq uar e. A thi rd tec hniq ue uses a slide
projector a nd a sm a ll m irr or to p roject images of a
conveni ent size for tracing on your d rawi ng ta ble.
The large sketc h on page 3 1 w as don e in this w ay.
) MWJrt4~~11-¥
Figure 2-26c Final sketch.
M \t?RD1<... IA~LE
~ -611~ ~?etf~
I~ I'1j kt-~td.-l - up
~ lIdu,y flat~ 9 1 A.('~
~kj?ru .
1 ><1 wood. ~4:
11 11
~-
( ~( d0 ~
~ th '\1\ l?oMt{
~LWt>r- 'f~~)
Ml~D1< 130)(
Fi gure 2-27 Projection table and projection box.
28 Dra wing
Fi gure 2-28a Original sketch.
Tracing 29
~
Figu re 2-32 Sketch of Athens, Ohio. Figure 2-33 Sketch of At hens, Oh io.
30 Drawing
Figure 2-34 a (opposite), b (above) Plan, section, and perspective of garden-court restaurant, Salzburg, Austria.
Perception 31
rt~
;~t~~
Figure 2-35 Waterfront, Mobile, Alabama. 11 , I ~ k ~
~ /~~
c h~ k-.tk
~~
~.JIIiF I
remain op en to its specia l ch aracteris tics. It m ay be
th e red undancy of form s or a pattern of shadows; it
may be an aw are ness of the sp ecial set of elemen ts
an d circu ms tances th at p ro du ces a p articularly in ter
estin g visual experience. A sketch of the interior of a
cathedra l can uncover th e exciting p lay of scale and
m at er ials. Th e ac t of dr aw ing can d rama tically Figure 2-36 Salzburg, Austria.
heigh ten your visu al sensitivity.
~?
32 Drawing
· ---~I c.,K
~. . . , . - --
_ .., M.A.~1-€
=._~~~'S.
Percep tion 33
Figure 2-40 Cartoon style sketch, after Rowland Wilson. Fi gure 2-42 Afte r Saul Steinberg.
oL ::=I:>::J
()~
Figure 2-41 After Saul Steinberg.
34 Drawing
Figure 2-44 Sketc h exte nding a view derived from
t he painting, Giovanni Arnofini and Hi s Bride, by
Jan Va n Eyck.
Figure 2-45 Drawing from imagination. Figure 2-46 Drawing from imagination.
Imagination 35
Visual-Mental Games
Everyone tr ies to copy the sketch he has received an d
An en te rtaining way to im p rove ha nd - eye - mind in turn pa sses th e copy to th e righ t. This contin ues
coord ination and promote an ability to visualize is to unti l the fin al copy is passed to the creator of the ori g
play some simple games. in al sketch . Then all sketches are ar ra nge d on a w all
or table in the order they were made. This ga m e illu s
1. Show a few people four or five cuto uts of sim
trates th e distinctiven ess of individ ual visual p ercep
ple shapes arranged on a pi ece of paper (above , left ).
tion (above, cen ter).
Ou t of view of the ot hers, one p ers on m oves th e
cut outs while verbally desc ribing the move. The oth 3. Doodles, usin g an arch itectural or de sign
ers attempt to d raw th e new ar ra nge me nt from the th eme, are another form of puzzle. He re, th e obj ec
description . Th is is repeated a few tim es to see w ho tive is to provide just enough clues so the subj ect is
can ke ep track of the pos ition of th e shape s. Aft er ob vious once the title is given (above, right) .
m aster ing th is exercise, have the persons draw ing try There are many visual p uzzles that exer cise our
to form a men ta l picture of each new arrangem ent visual per cept ion. Try some of those sh ow n opposite;
and then try to draw only th e final arran gemen t. In a look for more puzzles , or invent some of your ow n . In
sec ond version of this gam e, an object is su bstitu ted th e sketches opposite, an arbitrary diagram is given
for the cut outs, an d it is ma n ip u late d , op ened , or and the cha llenge is to use it as a parti for di fferent
taken apart. bu ild ings by seeing it as standing for a section or plan
2 . Form a circl e wi th a small gr ou p. Each pers on view for starters.
m akes a sim pl e sket ch a nd pa sses it to hi s righ t.
36 D raw ing
Figure 2-50 Visual puzzles.
Imagination 37
\
\ \ .. '\ ,
" t •~ . ....
,\ ' .. v, .', ·"~ .I'" ...
• • \ \ f ..... \.~~\~ . ':,
,•~" .,." '"' . \
" '~\~'f,
,'", I'
'<, " \ \
"-, .,\~.
"
'~ ~~~.~--
~_ .----1
•
3 ( nventions
39
',"/
Figure 3-4 Site plan. Figure 3-5 Axonometric.
Ther e ar e a gr ea t n umber of th ings w e can repre Th e elementary for ms of repres enta tio n discussed
sen t ab out a space or a build ing and many ways to at this po int are :
represent them. Th e sketch ed subjects can ra nge in
1. Comprehensive views- To st udy d esign s as com
scale from a building and its surrou nding proper ty to
plete sy st ems , w e must have m odels that repre
a window or a light sw itch . We m ight be interest ed in
se n t the whole from some view point.
how it looks or h ow it works or h ow to p ut it
togeth er; we m ay be se arching for clarity or charac 2. Concrete images- Dealing wit h th e m os t direct
ter. Variations in drawings ra nge from the concrete to experience. Abs traction is covere d in Cha pte r 4.
the abs tract , an d the convention s in clude sec tion or 3. Perceptual focus- Trying to involve th e vi ewe r in
cut, eleva tio n , persp ect iv e, axonom etric, isometric, th e expe rien ce signi fied by th e draw ing.
and projec tions . Med ia , techn iq ue, an d st yle acco unt 4. Freehand sk etches-Decision -m ak in g in de sig n
for m any of th e other variations. Ma ny of these va ria should in clude the consi derati on of m an y altern a
tions are cove red in lat er chap ters. tives. Represe n ta tion of altern atives is encouraged
by th e speed of freehand ske tch ing, w here as the
ted iou sn ess of "constr uc ted " hard-lin e d raw ings
d iscourages it.
40 Conventions
BUI LDING A PERSPECTIVE.
Rdure
9 1ane
l1 otrzon L U1l
Figure 3-8a Setting the pict ure plane Fi gure 3-8b Starting grids. Figure 3-8c Setti ng cross-grids.
and viewpoint.
Figure 3-9a Settin g the pict ure plane and Figure 3-9b Setting one grid, plan view. Figure 3-9c Setting t he cross-grids,
viewpoint, plan view. plan view.
Persp ec tive 41
Figure 3-10a Definition of space.
Sketching straigh t lin es freeh a nd is an im p orta n t using th e square gr id as a ref eren ce. Sha de appea rs
skill to ma st er for all ty pes of gra p h ic th in ki ng, an d on objects on the side oppos ite to the su n or othe r
p rac tice ma kes perfect. Once you begin to rely on a so urce of light w here no direct light fa lls ; shaded sur
st raighted ge, the work slows dow n. Sta rt by con cen fac es a re ge ne rally lighter in tone tl;an sha dows. As
trat ing on w h ere the line begin s an d end s ra ther th a n in sketchi ng exis ting build ings, I prefer to use pa ra lle l
on th e lin e itsel f. Place a d ot a t th e begin n ing a nd a ha tch lin es to show tones (see Building a Sketch in
d ot w h e re th e lin e s h ou ld e n d . As yo u re pea t th is C hapte r 2).
exe rcise , let th e p en drag ac ross th e p ap e r be tw ee n
Finally, de tai ls a nd objects ca n be add ed . Peop le
the tw o dot s. T his sou nd s pret ty ele men ta ry, b u t it is
ar e m ost importa n t because th ey esta bli sh th e sca le
su rprising how ma ny peop le have n ever bot he red to
of the space an d in volve th e viewe r th roug h id entifi
lea rn ho w to sketch a straigh t lin e.
ca tion w ith th ese sketched figur es. Sim p licity, real is
W ith th e ba sic p er sp ec ti ve a nd p la n com p le ted tic p roporti on s, and a sense of m ovemen t a re basic to
th e values, or tones, ca n now be ad d ed . Th e actu al good hu m a n figures such as th ese. T he squ a re grid s
col or of objec ts or p la n es, s h ad e, or s ha d ow s can help in co ordi na tin g the p lacem e n t of hum an figures
ca use d iffe re nces in values; ind ica ting th ese chan ging and ot h er objects in p la n a nd pe rs pective . Be sure to
valu es sh ow s th e in te raction of ligh t w ith th e sp ace, p lace p eo pl e a nd objects w he re th ey w ou ld really be ;
p rovid ing spa tial defini tion . Conve nt ions for castin g the p ur pose of th e ske tc h is to u nd er stand the sp ace,
s hadow s a re presen ted w hen pla n draw in gs a re di s n ot to ca mo u flage it.
cu ssed . For now, it is en ough to n ote tha t shadow s ar e
firs t cast in p lan and the n add ed to the perspect ive,
42 Conventions
Fi gure 3-11 Casti ng shadows in plan.
Perspective 43
OY1::W'\~\ r~~ ?I~
-
1t>r- \-f'O< lJIl ~~\Ve
-- - - - /
)7f'- ' <,
'
"
q (
Cl (
C\ (",
----
»> ./
~/ /
I
/
-4'l\
\ l) i?
1"
..... ,
-- /'
./
I)b
- ~2 /
/ \
/ :: »> ----
- :s: /
<,
1------
/ /
\
Figure 3-14 Modification of a one-point perspective. Figure 3-15 Organization of a modified perspective. after
Lockard.
QUALITATIVE REPRESENTATION spec t ive , p ara llel wit h the horizon lin e , are now
sligh tly slan ted in the di rect ion of th e imaginary sec
At this p oin t w e are not in ter es ted in th e qualities of ond poi n t. To m ake th e transition fro m one -poin t per
dr aw ing expressi on , such as style or tech niq ues; this spec tive , the top and bottom lin es of the pi cture pla ne
is cover ed in Ch apt er 5. By q ua lita tive rep resen ta can be given a sligh t slan t an d a new plane is estab
tion , I mean the rep resenta tion of the qualities of a lished ; by d rawing a new d iagona l, the new diagonal
space. I n hi s book Design D rawing W illia m Lock ard va n ishin g poin t can be set. A grid ca n also be app lied
ma kes a very co nvi ncing arg um en t for the supe riority to this type of perspective to help in plac ing objects in
of p ersp ectives a s rep rese nt atio na l d raw ings. the spa ce.
"Pers p ec tive s ar e m or e qualitat ive than quan titative.
To rep res en t th e q ua lities of an im agined space,
The ex per ien tial qua lities of an envi ro n m en t or
w e have to know some thing abo u t th e q ua lit ies of
ob ject can be perceived d irect ly fro m a p er sp ec
sp aces. Th ough th is seem s obv ious, it is of ten
tive.. .Th e q ua lities of th e space/tim e/ligh t con tin uum
ignored . As architect s, w e have to look for w hat gives
are much better re p rese n ted and u nderstood in p er
spaces th eir special charac ter , th e d ifferen t kinds of
spect ive (than by othe r co nven tions). " 3 Perspective s
ligh t, color , texture, pat tern , or sha pes possibl e and
have the adva ntage of showing the re lationsh ip of all
how they are combin ed . Con tin ua l sket ch ing in a
the elem en ts of a sp ac e in a way most sim ilar to how
sketch notebook is one sur e way of learn ing a bout the
w e w ou ld ex perie nce it whe n b u ilt. Alt hough it is
q ualiti es of spaces. Wh en th is know led ge is ap p lied
tr ue that bu ildings are not expe rie nc ed only through
to th e repres en ta tive pe rs pecti ve , w e must rem em ber
persp ectives, it is th e best way of sho w ing a d ire ct
to con vey th e t h ree-d im e nsiona l exp erie n ce of th e
visua l experience of a specifi c space.
sp ace onto a tw o-di m ensional surface, the pa per. To
Lockar d 's ch apter on representation has probably d o this, w e need to illus tra te the effect s of dep th or
the best ex p lana tio n of th e use of p ersp ec tive d ist ance upon th os e thing s th at giv e th e sp ace its
sketc he s for re presentat ion . Locka rd illustrat es a per q ualiti es. Wit h an increase in d epth , ligh t se ems to
spective view that is close to one-p oin t perspective ; it p ro du ce few er grad at ion s of to ne ; d et ail is less ev i
in volv es an imagin ary seco nd perspe ct ive po in t d en t; text u re and co lor are less v iv id ; ou tli n es or
added at som e dis ta nc e fr om the ske tc h (see Figur e 3 ed ges are less sha rp . Dep th can a lso be con veyed
15). Lin es run n in g the wi dt h o f the one -po int pe r through overlap of object or con tou r.
44 Conventions
Figure 3-16a Set up of sketch perspective based on Lockard method.
~
ii
PARALLEL PROJECTIONS additi on al ad va nta ge of rep res ent ing th ree -d imen
sional spa ce wh ile re taining the "tr ue" d im ensions of
Cur re ntly in comm on use, the axono me tric sketch is a p lan and sec tion .
an importa nt alte rnative to th e persp ect ive, plan, and
T h is las t ch aracterist ic makes a n axo n ome tric
section . The axonometri c is simp ly a projection fr om
easy to draw be caus e all th ree dimens ions are show n
a p lan or sect ion in wh ich all p a rallel lines in the
at the sam e scale. Axo no metric p rojections forward
space are show n as para llel; t his is in con tra st to a
or bac kward fr om p lan s or sections are convent ion
persp ective wh ere parallel lines are show n as exte nd
ally ma de a t an gles of 30, 45, or 60 degrees, bu t in a
ing fr om a single point. The axonom etric techniq ue is
sketch th e exact angle is no t imp ort an t as lon g as the
traditio nal in Chi ne se d raw ings. Instead of p lacin g
proje cted lines rem ain p arallel.
the viewer at a single poin t from w hich to view the
scene, it gives the view er th e feel ing of being every
w here in fr ont of the sc ene. The axonom etr ic has the
46 Conventions
1
r
VERTICAL SECTION
Vertical Section 47
~
~ ,
~..
48 Conventions
Fi gure 3-20 Transparent sketch.
~
I
I ,
- -- + - -
I
-- --
Figure 3-22 Cut-away view, the Simon House, Barbara and J ulian Figure 3-23 "Ex plodarnetric" drawing of a barn.
Neski, architects.
-,~
/ .1
.:% ,~
~
.f , 'jd .~ ~ ~
/ .: or '
-~ f1~ :
1, -
t~~· r'-:i?J~
- i::'"-~. t~
--- __~:_~..: _ ~<'~~
_l"E;'-~--,
- <=.:.
~
: I_ "" '-
__ ~_'_:~ --f _ ...
,t .i""
.. .
- :I( _ . ~
:-~- I
~
t:.t< ,,:.L..-<;.
\ l~~ ..., r , ' /, ~ ~ t6 ~ _ .
SKETCH TECHNIQUE
50 Conventions
\
Figure 3-26 By Brian Lee. Auto matic drawing done wit hout
looking at the paper. It encourages fluidity of line and
nat uralness of expression.
,v~/' ",L.-...-i
/~l=0 __\.
':
I'-l-LA.~ -c
.. c::I " v,
I ~-= \~ r
l~
. \..I;/
c~(~.
/
1/
-: "\
1"--'-\. ~ '-"'1 ~
<: l_ . _
Design ing d epend s heav ily upon representation ; 1 never k now what a drawing will look lik e until it is
to avoid d isappoin tm ent later, th e designer wa nts to finished. O nce yo u do, that's security, and secu rity is
see the p hys ica l e ffects of h is d ec is ion s. It is somet hing we ca n all do without in a drawing . It
inevita ble that a student w ill tell m e that he is waitin g comes from working in a particul ar way or styl e th at
u nt il h e has d ecid ed w ha t to do before he d raw s it enables you to control an y subjec t or situation you
up . This is backward. In fact, he can no t dec ide wh at enco unter, a nd once you're in control, you stop
to do until he has drawn it. N ine time s out of ten inde learning The nervousne ss and a nxiety that precede a
cisiveness is the result otiack of evidence. Fur ther m ore, drawing are importa nt to the end result.'
a decision imp lies a choice ; recogn izing th at th ere is
Architects who have been abl e to find adve n tur e
m or e than on e possi ble d esign so luti on , it ma kes no
and excite m en t in d raw ing w ill readily attend to the
sense w hatsoever to try to de term ine if one iso la ted
grea t boost it gives to th eir d esign' work and the ir
solution is good . In stead , t he ques tion s hou ld b e
th inking.
w heth er thi s is the best of the know n alternat ives. To
answe r this question , we must a lso be ab le to see the Fina lly, I wan t to str ess tw o of my p r ej ud ices
oth er designs. The grap hic thin king approach empha r egard ing represent ati ve d ra w ing. First , fr eeh and
size s sketches tha t fe ed thin k ing and thoug h ts tha t ab ility is v ital for effec tive use of rep resen tat ion in
feed sk etc hes; one is co ntin ua lly inform ing the other. arch itec tura l d esign . You m ust be ab le to tu rn over
For the begin ni ng d esign er , thes e po in ts can not be idea s ra pid ly ; to do thi s req uires th e spo n ta n eous
ove remphasi zed . graph ic d isp lay tha t rapid sk etc h ing provid es.
Second, a tte n tion sho u ld be p a id to m ak ing the
There is no way to avoid the inten se, com pr ehen
s ketches fa ith full y re p resen t d esign id eas. Avoid
sive job of representation or mode ling in design . The
ad d in g th in gs to a d raw ing s im p ly to im p rove the
only cho ice left is wh ether to m ak e t he j ob eas ie r
ap pea ra nce of the draw ing. Chan ges shou ld refle ct
throughou t a profes sional career by bec om in g a com
conscious chang es in the d esign . Kirb y Lockar d ca u
pe tent illu strator now.
tions, "Rem ember, th e best , m ost d irect and hon est
Havi ng sa id tha t, I wo u ld ad d the w arn ing th a t per su asion for a d esign 's ac cep tance shou ld be th e
draw ing an d thinki ng mu s t be alway s open to design itself , and all suc cessful persua sion sho uld be
gr owt h . Clic hes in drawing lead to cli ches in thi n k based on com pe te n t a nd hon est r ep resenta tions of
ing. As John Gund elfing er says: the des ign .:"
52 Conventions
Figure 3-29 Design development sketches.
4 Abstraction
55
rY1 0 dl + , e ~
.--- ---
-- ~
./
---- ---
-:
/ (d)
/
I
/
I
I
(
1\
/- - -
5VI£;\J.
no.",e )
",
\
\
/
,/ -----B
, I
- I- ... ,
/tj v'?t ';
(e) I
56 Abstraction
Building a diagram.
,--------, ,,
,... -------,
I ,
I
I
I
I
:, - - - - - - - -- -- --':
I
I
'_'\
Figure 4-4c By similarity. . \
I i
'L ._
. -j
r-"
--
...
Grammar 57
-$
. ?>
-- ~ c:::s
t:::3
o t=:I
- -
c::r
--=
~- I I
CJ • I I I , e:::t
-
m
Figure 4-6 Graphic grammar conventions.
ALternate Grammars
to co mm un ica te . Two of the m or e p rom inen t gra m
Th e basic grap h ic grammar disc ussed so far is mo st m ars ar c th e n et w ork a nd th e m atrix. Th e ba sis for
commonly exp resse d in what ar e known as b ubble th e gra m m a r of n etworks is t ime or seq u ence .
diagram s. It is p roba bly the most broad-based , ver sa Alth ough it is n ormall y assu med th at th e se q ue nce
til e gramm a r. Ot h er conven tions may qua lify as proceeds fr om left to right or top to bottom, arr ows
grammars, or r ul es for relating graph ic elemen ts so as are often used to clar ify the order or subtleti es of th e
se q ue nce. T he m ost fa m ilia r type of n etwork us es
58 Abstra ction
verb a l d escr ip ti on s of ta sks or eve n ts, but grap hi c
sy mbols could be used as wel l. The m at rix d iag ra m
incorpora tes the ot he r type of gra m m ar. Its co nven 0
..
•
•• • .. 0 .6 <) t::::l
I
n
tion as signs iden tities to rows and colum ns and rep
rese n ts the re lati ons hi ps of id en tities w ith gra ph ic
sym bols at th e in te rse ctions of the ro w s and columns.
+ x* t{}~~
VOCABULARY
0 (De $ 0 ®
EJ ill a ill 12I ~
The m eani ng of w ord s or sy mbols in any for m of lan
guage m ust be con sist en t and shared in order to su p
por t h u m an com m uni ca tion. This co nsistent set is
ca lled a voca bulary . Basic verb al vocabul ary wit hin 0 () .. S f4i8
our na tive la nguage is norm a lly acq uired in chi ld
hood th rough associ ation , w h ile gram m ar is learn ed
formall y. Lite racy is achieve d ove r se ve ra l years of
a (J~~ t1i8
edu cation . Th e acq uisit ion of grap hic language is not
a com m on comp one nt o f a general edu cation. In a
for m a l sense it is m ore often a part of ed uc at ion in
•• •• II aD t1 co
d es ign and a rt curr icul a . How ev e r, the re are som e
grap hic "la ng uages " to wh ic h the ge neral pub lic is
ex posed. Among th ose are in terna tional road sig ns ,
roa d map legend s, mu sic notat io n , and mathe matical
symbols.
••
t:::::::I
D liD
c::::l t:::::J
t::::1 c::J
t:::::1
-
- =-
a 00
Identities
There a re a grea t n um ber of w ays to sy mbolize a n
ide nti ty. The more common symbols are repres en ted
000
(
\
v .; ,/
I
I
Vocabulary 59
- - - - -- - - - -- - - -
-j ~-) ~~
-t>-.¢++
---0' . 0 0 0 _
D)D»}D»_
L»I>r>D={> ~
t::::lc::lt==1r:=:Jt::::Jt==1t:=l ~
J:::Ic::::It=lc::lllI=Is::::IJ:::Iw=I
---~--
••••••••••••••••••••
00000000000000000000
.. - ~~ ...
IUlllllllllllll1 l1 llllll11IlIl\lllllllllllllllIIlIIlIlIHlllllIllllllIlIl
e@~
nilU OO DDUDDDDDOOD DDOD noo onnn
Figure 4-8 II11III1IIIII11111111111111
Relationshi ps
o
As w ith ide ntities, di ffe ren t rel ation sh ip s a re best
represent ed by se ts of lin e types. The se line typ es can @)
also be used as borders for gr oup in g id entities as a @
m ean s of seg me nting a diagra m or of sh ow ing special
re lat ionship s.
• 0
The arr ow is a very sp ecial device for ind icating • 0
re lation sh ip s. As a sy m bo l of m ovem en t, Arn heim
hold s th at it has co m pellin g qu alities: //...any mo ve .0
me nt in the env ironment autom ati call y att rac ts at ten
tion because mov em en t m eans cha nge of cond itions, ......
:....i
wh ich may call for a rea ct ion. :" Arrows com bin ed
wi th lines ca n in di ca te a one-way rela tio ns h ip , a "
\..j
sequence of even ts, or a process. Separate ar rows can
be used to mark im po rta nt par ts of a d iagram or to
show dependenci es and th e fee d-in of suppleme n tar y
o
informa tion . Figure 4-9a Modification by size.
., .. Q: ....._..0'············9
Modifiers
Identi ties and rel ationsh ips ar e mod ified according to
.....0- ..
'. ~ ' ,
. , '
a hi erar chical sy ste m . In th is man ner, th e signifi
cance of part s and the d ifferent levels of intensity in
{
-, ....
D~ • •
60 A bstraction
•
-
~ L-I '--/
- eq()~ I -to
-3IE
"" • n
}ouaooHIE
/'"'0..
-
- Ident lcall.!:)
e.qualto
< SmGl l\er than
± plus-or-mlY1US ~
-r'"
-r'
""'
*
not eG\ 4q! to or
lar.0er t h ~n
~~
-
~ or etjLJal f o V 06)
-
q p p ro x rm<rtt~
~ equcl! 10 e:. thaYl
.?h'\a lIer
orE:ijual f o
••
• theretor-e
I- \- r I- f- H- H- t- H -1- H - H - H-+
,
+ I I I I I I I I I
-
Xl [ I 1 i I I I ! I
~ proporfl oM I A.. corre6f'ond0
•••
c1Y1 d so 0 1'1
fM VIlA wh! lim! ft?4 ~
to to ti/41 WI
///////////////
Figure 4-10 Mat hematical language symbols. Figu re 4-11 Graphic language elements from
cartography.
-CJ-D DD O 0
Figu re 4-12b Process symbols.
Vocabulary 61
•
••
•
••
•
••
G- 0- -f- ---41r.-
•• • • •• • •• ---H-- ~Tt- '). .
,
,¢
-I 1
,~I
(
,Sf
I
-q-0=0=9
,W /11 ,W
> > )
~cJCP
» » »
»J »> »>
-I \ t-
II II 11- -
-- \ \1 III \\1
. I I \ I I \\\lll~lll~
=1 J
\ I I 1 I I I
• . • • • • •
- - - - - - - - - -
---0 0 -0 0"'-'" _ •• It
---0 ·0 -,0·
)))))))))))))))))))))))J))))J)))))))))~
~ x )(
»»>~»»»»»»»»»~
) ) )
- A A A-
~
-
.iY"ff./"ff.L1.J5ffL1ffSL7fft'~
62 Abstraction
IILIII \III \I\II
11II1l\1I\I(I"
111111\1"'''1\
[!J a ® 00<DE9@(f)
o6co~'¢
II 11111111111\
~ a @
':I/£.YlLYI!..
)f'L ~ YL
~~~
:il.3L~
00 a @ rzIlZI@6 ~
;zfJ=(JA:
••••••
•• ••••
••••••
••• ••• (@<DCDO T ,< ~ ~ .» ~
~~-
~
~ @~0. tI-
, 1/~
~
./\A.A,.A.AIv
- --- ---
~~e • ~ f'VtPit ~
-- -----
-- ---- ..
-- - --- AhlJ.~A
ill ~ D {gJ IJ. .6~ A ~goo0
0
0
o£,
xx )(J<X A A 0
8: ••0
XXXM
xxx;xx fZl~ E8 ~ ....
- .. -0
00
lIno~~
xxxxx +
I\I\I\M
B[;] m~ .......
+++...+:tt :t'
+.t.T+ + + +'+
c c
IV\I\IV\
J\IVV'V\
/\I\I\AI\
~ ~~lt
~ ++ V \>
++ & + *~
Figure 4-14
11\~111l=
:>1Jll~
lVIa lill=
=\11\::00 tIt. ~ .... ••
Vocabulary 63
QO DCJ O
.... OftO
~
OQCltl
"_ OQ C'::J
~
vocabular y to be eff ec tive . The obvious co rollary is
our need to become grap hically "literate." We need to
becom e fam iliar wi th a ran ge of graphic languages.
"The th in ker w ho has a broad com m and of graph ic o
langu age not only can find m or e complete expression
for his think ing but ca n also re-ce nter his thi n king by ~ ~Ld, ? ~<:
o
m oving fr om on e graphi c lan gu age to anot he r. ..in
~~~ Ia~t~
64 Abstraction
Figure 4-18 Pedestrian traffic intensity.
~~J~
~~~ ~~~ ~~~~
Figure 4-19 Circulation choices, Place des Vosges, Paris. Figure 4-20 Housing price analysis.
Vocabulary 65
1~4 T;}(;4 ~- ,
~ '-l,
~>
.
' ~ - , . ~ -. :'1:,:' -,.~~ . - .
-"
,. ".. _. .
,~ '\:.
1. -l'
--,.;' ~-.;;
'
' .
Figure 5-1 (top) By Lo uis Kahn. Concept sketch for central Philadelphia.
Figure 5-2 (bottom) By David Stieglitz . Buffalo Waterfront Redevelopment Proje ct.
5 Expression
67
Figure 5-4 By Theodore J . Mu sho. Santa Costanza.
?'k
~~~
~
~' -r ,~
, 17"-1 '
\..- ' - l ~" tIt all!:~ ~/r::!C)
.)
~
~ '-
/
) ~
, 1 f, ~
~~ ~
-Q
.,
r'~ld -
1
\ \ \
, ;.,.
,I ,.
', .
),---i
\; ~
<,
~.
~
68 Expression
Figure 5-6 By Oscar Niemeyer. Capanema Residence.
.. ,.
70 Expression
Figure 5-11 By Thomas Larson. Sout h Station, Boston. Fi gure 5-13 By Romaldo Giurgola. City Council room, Boston City
Hall Co mpetition.
Figure 5-12 By Gerald Exline. Figure 5-14 By Michael Gebhardt. Hockey Arena/ Auditorium,
Soldiers Field, Harvard.
-- .
I
Figure 5-18 Paddack Residence study, Figure 5-19 By Jim Anderson, Sidewalk zone development. Terre
Haute Urban Development Action Program, Landplus West Inc.,
Landscape Architects,
ECONOMY
I - - .i / :' 1~/ / Ll
~ ~/7 ~
Figure 5-21 By Lisa Ko lber. Byzantine church, Myst ra,
Greece.Fi gure 5-21 By Patrick D. Na ll. Ahmed Ibn To ulon Mosque,
Cairo.
74 Exp ression
Figu re 5-23 By Lisa Kolber. Gateway at Mystra, Greece. Figure 5-24 By Ja mes Walls. Trinity Church, Boston.
,.
ra .. "
tr l ,
t ,
t
s;:
I ..
;,re.
Economy 75
"
76 Expression
AESTHETIC ORDER
o 0
o 0
-- -- /f\.
. .. -_...
I: :1 I - ~
I: :I ~ ./ '\.
-;7
<,
I: :1 )1 II I
I: :I
\ V
:..::..: :.=:..: - '-----._ - - --
fIi~~ .: :. ~ 0 n
•
6 Analysis
cco rd in g to Go rd on Best , th e an al ys is of
81
Abstract sketch es ca n express the structural artic
ulation of a system. Here are so me ways, usi ng th e
automobile as an exam ple:
1 . Distillation- Re m ov ing fr om th e draw ing all those
things that are not importan t to the an alysis of the
str ucture of th e system' s critical parts: highl ight
ing the electrical system.
2. Red uction- Representing group s of pa rts w ith a
sm alle r set of sym bols makes it easier for mos t of
Figure 6-3a Abstracti on by distillation. us to und er stand th e dr aw ing and en ter tain
changes ; there can be several levels of red ucti on
yielding increasing generali zati on . T his d iag ram
represents only th e major a u tom ob ile syst em s
(electrical, m ech anic al, fu el, etc.).
3 . Extraction -Throu gh contrast or em p hasis, a part
can be given special att en tio n while rem aini ng
with in the con tex t of its system: p osition of th e
distributor in the electrical system is stressed .
4 . Compa rison - Cas ting d iff er en t systems in th e
sam e graphi c lan gua ge fa cilita te s com par ison of
structural ra th er than superficial cha racte ristics of
differ en t syste ms.
~I
thinker moves readily back and forth between the
two. " 3 He suggeste d , "A w ay to obtain lit eracy and at
th e same time to ac q uire la n guage flexib ility, is to
learn how to use graphi c language to m ove thinking
f=-- i rt!Nl5 1"h I? ? (on and exp res sion from abstract to concrete m eanings
and ba ck. ":'
Figure 6-3d By comparison.
82 Analysis
Figure 6-4 Perspective of ent ry to Sunyats alo City Cente r, Alvar Aalt o, architect.
.N®\®
;':c
~
~
f'.
~'\
~
3 8 ~
~ 80 @8
B
!- IVw.::l \
Figure 6-6a Basic relationship bet ween functions. Figure 6-6b Po sition and orienta tion.
84 A nalysis
- -_. - -
Figure 6-6c Scale and shape of space. Figure 6-6d Enclosure and const ruction.
cific structura l, co ns truc tion , and enclos ure decisions tha t is w hy so many of us are so passio nate ly hooked
come in to play. Sufficien t for m al def inition has bee n on d esigning.
indi ca ted for t he diag ra m to be ca lled a schem at ic
D raw in gs, the vis ua l languag e d esigne rs us e,
design .
reflect all of the qua lities I have attached to design
Th is transforma tio n fr om pr ogra m to sche mati c ing . In the fo llowi ng chap ters I have tried to recog
de sign is on ly on e of several pa th s th a t cou ld have n ize the varia bi lity and ind ivi d ua lity o f d esign
bee n ta ken . By u nde rstand ing th e in ten t of the d ia p rocesses by not asso cia tin g graphi c th in k ing w it h
grams at each stage, w e ens ure tha t opt ions re m ain one d esign process. Rather, I have presented the uses
open , rather th an locked into on e for m too ea rly. of draw ings as d iscr ete eve nts to un cover the breadth
of richn ess that ex ists and leave ope n to each of us all
Most d esigners w ill agree tha t d es ign ing is n ot a
th e w ays and styles of grap hic th inking or designi ng
"clean " proces s; in other words , it is not a u toma tic,
that w e pr efer, that we enjoy!
eve n-pa ced, d ir ectional, ord erly, or tot all y rational.
We w oul d proba bly agree th at it is high ly persona l,
disc re te wh ile h olist ic, som et im es very cle ar and
so me times qu ite obscure, sometimes rapid and some
tim es pa infu lly slow, exci tin g and a lso ted ious. In
short , it is ve ry hu man rather than me cha nis tic. And
86 Analysis
Figu re 6-9 Design project information organized by major design variables.
Th e design problem can be caus ed by a change in pr ojec t infor ma tio n . De sign concerns, issues, p riori
an yone or a combination of the variables. The solu ties, or, as show n here, crite ria ca n be ga thered under
tion to th e proble m m ay lie in changing any on e of these va ria ble head ings. Th is p romotes a ba la nce d
the variables or a com binati on of t hem. The design vi ew of the design p roblem and a mo re complete
solution is not synony m ous w ith the designed build eval uat ion of design alte rnatives. (T he application of
ing; rather, the de sign draw ings ar e the em bod im ent evaluation criteria is dis cussed fur th er in Chapter 9.)
of a new ba lance betw een need , context, and for m . In th is section , we deal w ith the graphic abstraction
The success of th e design solu tion is m eas ured by th e of th e a rchi tec t 's d esign prob le m a s descr ibed by
wa y it responds to all three variables. n eed , contex t, and form.
Th e ca tegories of nee d, con text, and form can also
provide a conveni ent struct u re for or ganizing de sign
•• III
o-fA Y1.a ~ ~
I
I I I I
(a)
~
6k'MW1tWy
o-f Av t"-s ~
(b)
o iii o
OWVl ev- {/ea0 ~+- ~u5l
88 Analysis
Figure 6-12 Bubble diagram of functional relations hips.
~1-r~
~ rt-~eV1 -------'1--4
~Y17D (tV\ 8
redt
~
Gv~ ~
~~ ~
~13t{,~
Nee d 89
7 ~ q 10 II 11 I ~ ~ 4 6 cP 7 9 9
KrrcH~N ~ r%
{2~ ~ ~
l-tVING~M ~ ~ W2
VEc{( ~ ~~
B~f<OOM -. ~ ~
f;A1H
ourDoor<s ~~ ~
J:; ~~ ~~
/f'
I
)flJJ-L-('-L9 --t~ ~
/
---I rt>: .-L -<"""'--/,-/,;;,-./-
\ v'~<.
--7 ~dUl
l
V
I , , \ ' I r -:">
C ...-""
~__ ,J i:>
( <----..wI
~ttwtJ(l) (
'J/VleW? l ~ M-
'-~
90 Analysis
-.\\
~ s;
C) ~ ~
~ .s
~
~ ~ ~ ii § \0
~
~ ~ ~
.:J
£s::: ~
~
~ ;::. ~
\.U. W Y -=:1 U C3
WW1.q,rt
0Ld~ t+
C~cAu
Maltl1m~
f lJ\ er~~
f rex(btl t1:J
Figure 6-15a Matrix diagram of relationships betwee n design issues and spaces.
Design Priorities
To ma ke a successful hou se, an arch itect m us t help
th e cl ien t choose h is p riori ties , as h is de sires ofte n
exc eed w ha t is fin a nci all y p ossible. Bu t p riorities
remain a va gue notio n for mo st pe opl e un til they see
a spe cific bu ild ing d esi gn with a price tag. The n
come s th e prun ing and p ush ing and p ulling , end ing
wi th a des ign that loo ks as if it has been th rou gh a
str eet fight. A m atri x diagr am clarifies p ri orit ies so
the client can better un d ersta nd them before pro
ceeding to buildi n g-for m altern a tives. T he ma trix
starts w ith a list of d esig n issu es an d a list of fu nc
tions. At ea ch p oin t of relationship in the m atrix, w e
as k th e importance of thi s issue to this function . The
d egree of impor tance is ind icated by the size of th e
d ot. W hen th is process ha s been comple ted for each
issu e, the m ost imp ortant issues and functions (those
with the highes t cu m ulat ive deg rees of impor ta nce) Figure 6-15b Revised mat rix indicating priorities.
can be identified and a hier archical list of iss ues and
fu nctions for med. W he n th e mat rix is rec on stru cted
with issues a nd sp aces a r ra nge d in t hei r ord er of
impor tan ce, it is possible to ma ke so m e ob servat ions
ab out cr itica l areas of the d esign p rob lem .
N eed 91
~
7
Design Objectives
As analysis of needs pr ogr esses, it is oft en helpful
Analysis of a design problem requires the explorat ion to specul ate on optimum re latio nsh ip s a m ong the
of th e broad se t of issues, con tex ts, an d con cerns. To activi ties that m a ke up the bu ildin g p rogra m . By
initiate thin king abo ut the pro blem , we can ada pt a illu strating alt ernative patt erns of rel at ionsh ips, th e
te chn ique used in cr eati ve writing that builds a net desi gner can become m ore attu n ed to th e issues of
work of ve r bal as socia tion s. To brin g th e subcon syn thesis of a range of concern s. To avo id premature
scious m ind in to action , the stan dard tabulated lists as sum pti ons abo u t physical forms t hat would be
are replaced by a loose, open-ended method of nota app ropriate to solving the de sign problem, activities
ti on that le ts ideas develop in an organ ic p at tern ar e purposely r ep re sen ted by nonspe cific shap es .
mu ch like the roots of a tr ee. As a comp lex netw ork Some de si gners have r eferred to th ese sh ape s as
of ass ociations develops, we can begin to iden ti fy th e "potatoes. "
mo st imp ort ant issues and re lationsh ips.
92 A nalys is
o
00
dlr. Darn,G
0
o
r
0000
••
~O -
0° 0 0
OUe
Fi gure 6-18 Compa rative schematic layouts.
N eed 93
Figure 6-19a Available land. Figure 6-19b Zoning restrictions.
Figure 6-19c Geological conditions. Figure 6-19d Composit e of the three criteria.
Wtrtfer Fall
OD
Contex t 95
?:01J6S
PA-1110/
BNTR, 5
NOD ~ ~/
LANDM M-~ S
Figure 6-23b Social interaction zones. Figure 6-24 Ur ban image analysis.
Activity Patterns
intensity. The low er d iagram show s no des or zon es
W h en inserting a new s tr uc ture within an exi sting that are th e mo st likely sites of so cial interaction .
en viron m en tal con text, s uch as a college campus, Lan dmarks are indica ted be cause th ey oft en m ar k
curr ent patte rns of pedestrian ac tivity sho uld be an sites of arranged meetin gs between individuals. To
im p ort an t con sid era tion . T he upperm ost diagram th e right is a se rie s of site analysis dia grams based on
above tr aces the dom ina nt patterns of pedestrian analytical ca tegor ies developed by Kevin Lyn ch. "
mo vement and reflects to so m e exten t their relative
96 Analysis
f1tEL.IMINARY DE5tG-N WO(~"'G
L--_ Il_ -
kTh1(~utd J
Figure 6-25 Co mparative construction processes.
l~ l lt;~l l~ I
~~l ~~Il~r~ }
Construction Processes
I
Arc hitects may overl ook at tim es th e im pac t of th e
cons truc tion p ro cess as a co n text for the de sign solu _~d~ ~~ __ J
tion . Construction m etho d is recogni zed as a strong
determinan t of for m in vern acula r arc hitect ur e, a nd AreA J f.0~II?(e
it is s till in fl ue nt ia l in con te mp ora ry architectura l MJuitMt4"
des ign . With the pr essur es of fin a nc ing and the varia
tions in th e cost of bor row ing fu nd s, in novations in
con str uct ion processes a re co n tinua lly e mergi ng.
When th ese p roce sses a re includ ed in th e set of
deter m in an ts of fo rm, th e d esigne r enhances th e
p ro ba bi lity o f d eve lopin g a s ucc ess fu l d es ign .
Abstra ct rep resent a tion of the a ltern a tive constr uc
tio n processes, a s wi th ot her d es ign d e te r m in an ts,
promotes the d esign er 's intuitive acce ss to these con
siderations .
Context 97
Physical Site Analysis
Site featur es can incl ude mac ro- and m icr o-clim ates,
topograp hy, nat ur al circu latio n , view s, and land scap
ing elemen ts suc h as trees , b ushes, rocks, or w at er.
Th ese site features m ust be con si de red in ord er to
p lace and d esign a hou se . Abstrac t sketc hes can
un cover probl em s an d op port un ities by sho wing th e
site fea ture s sim u lta neous ly. T he illus tra tio n used
h ere focus es on genera l s ite ch aracte ristics ra th er
tha n on sp ecific de tai ls. Focu si ng on ge n era lities
helps th e de signe r to for m a vi sua l me m ory of th e
impor tan t sit e considera tions . W ith the aid of these
sk etc hes, other pe rceptions ca n be de rived , s uch as
\~
w ind , p rivacy buffers, or th e best site for b ui ld ing.
For th is rec re ational house, th e sun p attern , the ridge
of the land , and the su mmer breeze suggest th e gen
era l orien tation of the bu ild ing. Th e ex isting site .~
ent ry, d isp osition of the trees, and the small river to \
the south se t up th e p rominen t view s and basic site .6 lit::
circula tio n . Thi s site a na lys is ca n be fur the r
exte nde d, ta king int o accou n t p rogram ar ea needs to
ex p lore som e prel im ina ry a lte rna tives for b u ildin g Fig ure 6-27a
m assing, as show n at th e far right.
-ro?oGRAf~Y
Fi gure 6-27b
98 Analysis
Figure 6- 27c
Figure 6-28 a
Figure 6- 28b
Figure 6- 27d
Figure 6- 28c
Contex t 99
-- -
T r
L[ ~ ked f'oxetS GYOVvea 13oxe?
0fft/~ lI/t.g 'B6Xt'&
FORM
-
The third set of variables, form, is under the control
of the designe r. In th is area h e can help the clien t
m ake decisions after the need and context variables
..... I
hav e been ide ntified . But rem ember tha t th e soluti on
to th e d esign p rob lem ' is bas ically an ag reem en t
betw een need, context, and form . In a sense, all th ree
-
se ts of variab les are flexib le un til a fit is ac h iev ed .
Some designers expe ct th e client's progra m and the On~- W())j &IC!
Space/Order
Variations of the spa tial or ga niza tion of a hou se ar e
n um erous. A few examp les ar e sh ow n here in plan
diagrams using a sim ilar d rawing style to facilitate an
easy comparison . The w all s ar e d raw n w ith h eavy Two--Wa3 Q r~d
lines so the d iagrams can em phas ize space by clearly
defining solid and void . Furth ermore, titles are give n
to each organ izational ty pe as an importan t aid for Figure 6-29 Alternati ve spatial organizations shown in plan view.
eas y recall.
100 A nalysis
lrfj~~== J
Q O'Gt4 Box
g
Figure 6-30 ALternative enclosure types.
Ab ove , a ra n ge of or ga ni zati onal types sh ow s are al so con sider ed . Note how di fferent app roaches
th ree-d im e nsiona l op tions for sp a tia l order an d t h e to e nclosure can lead to va rie ty in for m al exp ression
im plications for ap p eara n ce . Structur e an d mat erials or aesthetic.
Form 101
Scale/Proportion
tf~ ~le
Although they can enjoy the qu alities of form, ar chi
tects do not automatically pe rce iv e how the form
variables ar e arranged to ac hieve a specific effect. In
add iti on to th eir for m al ed uca ti on, m os t arc h ite cts
spend a lifetim e gath er ing in sights or pe rcep tion s
about suc h qua lities.
O n e effe ctive w ay of incre asing perception is
th rough visua l analys is. T he em p hasis of a specific
va riable such as scale or rhythm in a sketch can be
Figure 6-31 Important human-related sizes.
abstracted fro m the co n text of the bu ildi ng. Sca le
implies a relati onsh ip of sizes. The size of p eop le is
th e handiest reference for oth er sizes; this is call ed
human scale. Alth ough it is obvious that all structures
~ ' t va rch:l ot ~Ut le~
ca n not be wi t hi n our scale, w e ca n feel m ore com
fortable w ith a large bui ldi ng if certain of its features
range in size fr om human scale to the overa ll build
in g. Throug h grap hic analysis, w e can begin to under
st and how scal e is ha ndled in different bui ld ings.
The effect of prop ortion s on the design of a bui ld
ing can be represented for analys is in a sim ilar way.
Propo rtion is th e relatio ns hip betw een di m ensi on s
(horizontal-vert ical). Through abstraction, the impact
Figure 6-32 Dormitory building, New York University, of p rop ortions on ex ist in g build ings ca n be bett er
1. M. Pei and Associates, architects. unde rstood .
?t'lfOr1LoV1 ~G6
102 Analysis
-
I I, I
Figure 6-34 Traditional brick const ruction. Figure 6-35 Cu rtain wall construction.
Mass/BaLance
Anyone w ho has taken up joggin g is w ell aware of th e
im po r tan ce of mass a nd balan ce in hu m an experi
en ce. We all have a built-in se nse of thes e q uali ties,
cau sing us to r espond to t hem in bu ild ings.
Furtherm ore, m ass and balanc e are associa ted w ith
m any ot her feelings, such as sec ur ity and flexibili ty.
In a bu ild ing, a sense of ma ss can convey sec uri ty or
perman ence; a sen se of air iness can convey flexib ility
or fr eedom . Th roughout arc hitec tural history, many
met hods have been di scovered for varying the appar
en t m ass of build ings. By anal yzi ng b uild ings th at
hav e clear sensations of m ass, the use of su ch formal
devices as hor izonta lity, verticality, and em phasis ca n
be uncov ered .
Walking is a tremendous feat of ba la nce . M uch of
the enjoyment of w alking, rid ing a bike , skiing, and
th e like is derived fr om the ten sion betw een stability
and instability. We have a fin ely tuned sense of bal
ance that carries over into our visual pe rcep tion. The
d iffe ren t w ays of ar ticu latin g balan ce in b uild in g Figure 6-37 Grabbe platz at Dusselporf, Ja mes Stirling, architect.
design ca n be also h ighlighted t hrough abstract
ske tches. The sketc hes shown he re deal w it h sy m
m etrica l and asym me tr ica l ba lance in com po sit ion
and three-dim ensiona l ba lance, an im por tant part of
ar chite cture.
Form 103
-
mmillm
~ )
Figure 6-39 Casa Mila, Antonio Gaudi, archite ct. Figure 6-40 Wolfsberg Center, Alver Aalto, architect .
Repetition/ Rhythm
One way of ac hieving unity in a build ing is throu gh [
l[~ ~ti ~~
re pe tit ion of parts that are alike, suc h as w indow s or
~I
! ~fJ ~ l~~
~ ~ -- -----------------\(
column s. Simi larity of objects, even if on ly pa rtially
. . 1'; L~ igg~ UU L
1 Ir --~
__
-HJ.:..j ~ ' " ;' '\ a /'' ,l-'11
r-------I m-1 ~ H rTTTr."n; r:f ,:, "I II • fI I
sim ilar, is a w ay of emp h a siz in g associa ti on . --i
104 A nalysis
Figure 6-42 Sout h facade, Lit chfield High School
Gymnasium, Marcel Breuer and O'Connor & Kilham,
architects.
Unity/Diversity
The d egree of unity or d iversi ty exp ressed in a b u ild
ing con st itutes ano ther class of form variables. The
"other varia bles (scale, p ropor tion , m ass, ba lance, rep
et iti on , or rhy thm ) can be used to ach ieve unity or
diversity. Som e of the w ay s of increasi n g u n ity
incl ud e fr am ing or em p has izin g a bo rd er; using a
contin uous pattern , mod ula r grid , or a sing le shape,
w hich is at the sa m e scale as the bu ilding; and mai n
tain ing ind ep en de nce be tw ee n th e parts and t he
whole.
Div ersity can be ac hieved by p la nned violat ion of
the rules of unity: avoid ing fram ing or cons iste n t pat
tern ; va ry ing r h y th m s or mo d u les ; u sin g mult iple
Figure 6-43 Ohio Town Hall project , Vent uri and Ra uch.
grids ; and breaking up the domina ti ng geom etry.
U nity and d iversity are not m utua lly exclusiv e; it
is po ssible to overlay them and thereby in crease th e
intensity of bo th at trib ut es.
Form 105
~ ~S)~
\--
\--
!) P
~
c:Jt::::J
D 1-
b d
Figure 6-48 Kresge Co llege, University of Ca lifornia, Santa Cruz,
MT LW/Moore Turnbull, architects.
~ ~
[G •
~ [1Jl ~ [1J]
• 2J
-$
Figure 6-46 Hurva Synagogue project. Louis Kahn, architect.
=
"t:::I
=J
Fig ure 6-47 Mt. Angel Library, Alva Aalto, archite ct.
..
c==J
Figure 6-49 Am erika-Gedenkbibliothek, Berlin, Mo rphosis,
architects.
Hierarchy
use of abstr act sk et ch es such as those show n here. In
Con cep tual strength and clarity often play a n impor corresp ond ing seq ue nce , sta r tin g a t the top , the
tan t ro le in the experie nce and use of a b uild ing. A sketches in Figures 6-45 , 6-46, and 6-47 pres en t th ree
sens e of hierarchy can co n tr ib ute m uch to th e con app roaches to h iera rc hy : dominant size, cen tra l loca
cept ua l presence of ar chit ecture. W hether as analysis tion, and u niq ue shap e. As reflected in Figur es 6-48,
o f ex is ting b uildi ngs or as sp ecula tio n a bou t an and 6-49 , app roa ches to h ierarchy a re oft en com
eme rgin g design , int ent ions can be highligh ted by the bin ed to ach ieve grea te r impact.
106 A nalysis
Fi gure 6-50
SOURCES OF SOLUTIONS in t rod uced to mod ify th e concep t. These stud ies
shou ld m ake clear some of the follow ing ad vantages
As w as poin ted out before, th e origin of a d esign solu of a bs tr ac t d iagrams:
tion may be foun d in a nyone of the three typ es of
1 . The vari et y of id eas vi sib le a t one tim e is ve ry
var ia bles : n eed , co n te xt , or fo rm. O n the following
stim ula tin g for th in king.
page s are ca se studies based on th e recreat ional
house examp le. In ea ch study, an a bs trac t diagr am of 2 . Th e differen ces in t he t h ree typ es of varia b les
one of the va ria bles is used as the source of a basic p rom ote a va riety of solut ion alte rnatives .
organ izing id ea for th e hou se ; th en con strain ts or 3. Att ention is focused on general iss ues instead of
con siderat ion s from the other types of varia bles are d etails.
I S-g aJnfi ~j
~~f7Y No. 12.
e~~s()Y"( V6 ~re
Figure 6-52
S.ISr\[ rJUV 0 11
7 Exploration
h ile th e a rchi tectura l d es ign p rocess It is simp le enough to list those "attributes of creativ
115
r- WfJ
&~ It
~ ,r '/ ' Ivt\!(k- f""~
f , -,
, '; ,.:>'" J I
~--
/,1 . ~~
()vt v 1 ~ .ff W\3
:</
~ .. . 1 ~) < Figure 7-4a
r ','
. \ ".;' .
< . . ........
~
Cjj
, " ~1<Ll.
\VlftyfYCIlfllOh
-rrttN1~a veV\ C3
\\ Figu re 7-4b
( 1 7~""" \fiT -( r - l);
I i , ';:, ; .;,.,
I' ~ i l ''''''~
-Cb
, J:~~"-~~~YllT:l
. l-~'~~·~~ ..
,r':
i ,....
,\ I: I ,( I
,'. ,,,
~I ,j ,
116 Exploration
c .~
.'
~}
t--==--==- . . . ~ -----
Figure 7-6 By Lo uis Kahn . Co ncept study, Un iversity of Vi rginia Figure 7-7 By Gera ld Exline.
Chemistry Building.
Open-Ended Images 117
J RAN5 f oR i\A ATION?
o ~Q r;] ~
uliJGl ~
II o
1<'evev6al t7 t~t'r-+tOtl
Figure 7-8 Fo ur types of t ransformation.
11 8 Explora tion
Figure 7-9a Topological similarity Figure 7-9b Evolution of topologically equivalent house plans.
between a doughnut and a cup.
Figure 7-10 Topological analysis of t hree houses designed by Frank Lloyd Wright.
Transformations 119
! ~uDDQDD~uuuuQ
DDDDDDDDDDDD[Du~uuQu~QuD
J . T /U NS/.AT/ON
4. IN VERSION
5OD~OuDDDDDUDDOd
,-'m
I l 5. Translation and Rrfteetivt Imersion
DeP[J~DDDDDDDD9=J
5 . String course Ollt ,. rht
Po na tb ena i c Fri ez e,
~ 0 Partbenon , A /Mm .
bTIITDooo o 0
7. A ccderanon
[3 Gm lt
Owmj_,PI.XVlI, "". 58.
I laJt .
'~
QWW\J\A 7. Orna ment from Egyp" an
o o
mJlmmy (a u .
~ Ou..m j ono . PI. VI II , no. 17.
DDOCiill1
kiY 8 . Dtet/frorion
S,.",.dwjeh islands
fly
==== =So
~
\
I
--
I" "9
. =
/ ff
.=-. v.-=
f.=. ~
- , 11\
p
~ ~'
f:.
r- , 1
o i f"- . ' _..... __ . . :~ :I
I
I
, I Y <,
,
.
~ , \ , - i I
- ......
l-
I ' :;;:;;;0;
T "
'
TT SisI= !
r 1-
l ~~ 1
d 1 <, ~
I
~
_ '
... 1\ \I ~
-
'"""'=
.:
<, ":L.
~l I~
\I \ I \ /
Figure 7-12 By Thomas Beeby. Applications of ornamental
grammar.
1 I I
0 0 cJ
I
the unit merely slides along the surface of the pla ne,
in a straight line or a circle, but in both reflect ion
%
\3
. '
an d inve rsion the unit is flipped over in spac e to I I I
presen t its under side. W ith refle ction (illustra tio n 3), 1m-mUm I mm it'J"
X
trat ion 4), the un it is flipp ed over its centra l horizon
tal axis . More complex configuratio ns are derived
from a combination of these fou r basic operations.
Translation accompanied by reflection is probably
the most famili ar. Transla tion acc ompanied by reflec
Um t 1'"'"';0" Rt~etir~ lrnrrsifm Rotarioff
tive invers ion is another typ ical opera tion (illustra
tion 5). Th e complexity increases through devices
suc h as shifts along the horizontal axis, or glid e line,
leav ing gaps between uni ts, to produce slipped reflec
tion or alterna tion (illustra tion 6}.. . . A lso, by accel
erating (illus tration 7) or decele rating (illustratio n 8),
the rhythm through decrea sing or increasing eith er
the size of the units or the distance between them,
one can tra nsform sca le,'
Transformations 121
UOljvJ.o/dxg ZZ I
~_-===t=-_
~ Dd lIT o§
Gt-wr
~ r~W ld lJ tl l
[)r-~es
Wall
f ..IUI iJ
o~~s
,~'I.DlL
,~
Reversals
Archit ectur al examples of complemen ts are w alls
Reve rsals are cha nges in an ima ge fr om its fir st char and openings , m aterials and the joirits betw een ma te
act eristics to op posite cha ract eristics [ligh t to dark , rials, vertica l and horizon tal , rectilin ear and curv ilin
object to space, open to closed , etc.). Th eir us efuln ess ea r. To ch a nge our p ercep tions, w e ch a nge th e
derives fr om th e qualities of the contra sting comple em phasis of an im age to its com plem en t or contrast.
m ent. Th e Chi nese philosophe r Lao-Tzu held tha t th e The simp les t for m of rever sal is called figur e-ground
essen ce of everything we could see lies in what we drawing. Two sketches are m ade of a sub ject su ch as
can not see; the esse nce of m an is not in his physical the Piazza San Marc o (oppo site ). In one sketch, th e
appearance, and th e ess enc e of arch itecture is not in build ings are shown in solid black an d in the oth er
the visible str ucture. The Taoist sym bol yin and ya ng ske tch , th e space between the bu ildings is sho w n in
re p rese nts th e absenc e of ord er, chaos, as a bl ack bl ack . By look ing at the tw o s ketc he s at the same
backgrou nd ; the tw o r evo lv ing for ms are yin and time, it is po ssible to get a better under stand in g of
yang, th e con trast in g com plemen ts th at m a ke up bo th space an d bu ildi ngs a n d the re lationsh ip
or d er, n igh t a nd day, a m u si cal n ot e and a pau se, between th em . Figure-gro und sketches can be used to
active and passive. Th e ide al condition , pe rfec tion , is study elevations of bui ldings, patterns, profiles, mass
symbolized as a dynami c balance between op posites: ing, and m any other problem s.
gro ups of people are defined by ind ivid uals and indi
vid uals are defined by groups; th e color of an orange
change s in intensity w ith the changing background .
?~tdDW\~~-t c>r-le;~~
of ~~ th u~e 2;!]
~V\UkPul"e
Op~ V t lM.; C6 Kt-~ ll ed Vi ew
Bj [
A1t-~0" .], h v~~ h f osed C6(UW\Y\
Co I«lMV\ 'W' tva[[
Figure 7-17 Reversals of architectural experience.
Anot her type of reversal is experien ce reversal. If bles glued to gether, conside r them as car ved out of a
the norm al kinest hetic exp eri enc e of a ch urch pro so lid block .
gresses from small to lar ge scaled sp aces, a reversal of
1. If a circulation sequ ence ha s been see n as a series
scale can ev o lve a ne w form . If it is norm al for a
of spaces , concen tra te in stead on the pas sages.
beachfron t hou se to be op en and be orien ted to the
view, in trod uce en closure and inward orientatio n . 2. Wh en a studen t gets hung up on one design solu
Th e design of a Japanese teahou se em ploys a wall to tion or h as tro uble develo p in g an idea , I suggest
deny view s in order to intensify th e view seen th at th e given bu ilding progr am be for ced into a
through a small window. Design ers som etimes hav e a typical facility for a hi ghly contrasting program or
probl em try ing to h ide a bu ild ing element ; the solu activity, fo r exampl e, ban kin g in a restauran t, a
tion could in stead be to emphasize that very element. hospital functi on in a cou ntry cl u b setting , or a
home in a fact ory.
Gra phic images can also be used to rev erse thi n k
in g process es. Instead of th in king of sp aces as bub
126 Exploration
Figure 7-18a Reversal of perception , positive vs. negative space.
Transformations 127
1
, \
~ . -- r--
~
. -
-
,... J
.
" - _ oJ
Distortion
The Du tch ar tis t M . C. Escher create d a wonderful
wo rld of fa n ta sy throu gh op tic al illusions based on
th e rep resen tational syste ms of th e Renaissance. He
ach iev ed di st ort ions th at dramat ica lly alter our view
of re ality through simple man ip ulat ion of these rep
resent ationa l systems, as in th e lit hograph Ba lcon y.
By w ay of an exaggeration of the projection m ethod
used for maps of the w orld , he imposes a simple grid
over th e co nventional drawin g and th en doubles the
size of the cen tral sec tion; th us the di storted gri d is
used as a referen ce sys te m to comp lete the dr aw ing . (a) NOV'Yv\a1 Gv1d
12 8 Exploration
DO
DO
DO
0 0
DO
cJO
I
- _-r--;,._~~",;,-",;,--' I
i
r
i
\-- --I
I
I
1- _ l
Transformations 129
f-
r
'lIl
~u ~ r
I
-
-
-
I I I I I I I II
f
Figure 7-26 Field t heory space organization, Architecture and Art Figure 7-28 Casa Papanice, P. Portoghesi, and V. Gig liotti ,
Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, Walter Netsch of architects.
Skidmore Owings & Merrill, architects .
- -JO Dt-J
r=uC?
DUIXI Axes
DO
000 ODD
"6 f li'l I S "
Poin ts and lines ca n be used in im age s for ord e r ber of differe nt s paces. T h e se line s, referred t o as
ing fun ct io ns o r spaces, transfo rm ing the in fo rm a tio n datu ms, ca n be st ra ight o r curv ilin ear.
in to a new fo r m . Points p r ov ide a fo cu s for ra d ia l
Above, the b a s ic o rd e rs of p o in t a n d li n e a r e
co mposit io ns of a w ide va ri e ty. W h en two p oints are
ex te n de d or combi ned to fo r m seve r a l ord e r ing
p la ced in close p roxim ity, binod al con figura tio n s ca n
d ev ice s of varying d egre es o f comp lexity . T hey are
be deve loped , but as th e tw o p oin ts a re p ulled far the r
not incl ud ed as a kit of d evices so much as th ey a re
apart , a lin e is form ed , op en ing up a numbe r of a xia l
m ea nt to s uggest p ossible m a nipula tio n a lte rn a tives
a rra ng ements. Axia l ord e rs incl ude d ua l a xes, majo r
by w h ich ea ch d esigne r m ay exp lore h is ow n tools.
wi th minor ax es , and p a ra llel axes. Line s can a lso be
used as "spi nes" for colle cting a nd o rga nizing a n um
/
DO
Matrix
T h e matrix provides still another way of applying
order to the transformat ion of images. The example
at right illustrates the basic application of a matrix.
Differen t concep ts of building placement on the site
are show n across the top, a nd differen t degrees of
ar ticu lation are indicated in th e vertical d irection . By
sh ow ing the combinations of th e two considerations,
a number of forms evolve. T he example below (from
a stud ent project) is a search for alternative configu
ra tio n s of an urb a n zo n e development. The basic
order s are shown in th e left vertical column and dif
fe rent combi na tion s of city bloc ks in the r igh t col
umn . Fr om these, different in terpretations are
formed .
• •
B ~ ~EJ -+ . -+- ". O· Of},. -+~ --+ •
• • --+ --+ -+- ~- -t fJ 8--1 G" ++ -tEJ GO
D~ D~ " b:. 0-+ G·· ~ _G.
=
• • +-+
• •
=
=
~~
#'
~~ .. :
- ....
·u(/ "1 r •
I
1. ·\..
'. I I ' :,
'L '\ ~ ~
c
' .
-.
,I
"
~ ~-
. I
_~ - Ir~._. ".. . ~
.
~ .. ..
_
,"r "'
t U " .. - .~ .
~
I
-.oe. ...
Or· J
A Pyramid of Possibilities
m ent of ideas; they ce nsor th em be for e th ey ever get
It is my hope that , as you begin to exp er iment w ith them on paper, and so th ey never ge t a ch ance to
some of the sk etch tech ni q ues in th is chap te r, the have a n ew look at th eir ideas, deta ched from them
loosening up an d fr eedom fro m rigid thin king will sel ve s. Th e situation is com p ara bl e to an aspi rin g
op en up an exciting new persp ective about designing. son gw riter who never plays his m usic for other peo
It ca n be a n energizing exp erien ce th at be comes pl e. In isola tion , he m ay be abl e to d ev elop it to a
addictive . Relax and enjoy it! point , but w ithout te sting it th rough the responses of
other people, he wi il be handicapped .
Part of the p ote n tial of exploration derives from
th e fact that ide as breed id eas. As the graphic think If w e look closely at th e no tes a nd sketch es of
ing cycl e gets m oving with ease, the gr oup of ide as so m e arch ite cts , th e rapid grow th of ideas be comes
ra pid ly expands in a very rough py rami dal p rogres obviou s. The gro wth is sporad ic and multidirectional.
sio n. If only tw o new images are perceived for ea ch Att ention shifts fro m th e scal e of a plan or site plan to
one draw n, th e gr owth in id eas can be am azing , but details of w indows or handrails. There ar e also shifts
for many designer s this is a big "if." Th ey are afraid in th e typ es of sketches. Som e architects rely hea vily
of w a stin g tim e by fo llow ing their in stin cts or on plans as vehi cles for concept development ; others
indu lgin g in th e fa n ta sies of fr ee as so ciation. work exclus ively in elevat ion s, w hile still othe rs are
Desi gn ers al so have d iff ic ulty in suspending judg most com fortable with perspective sketches .
134 Exploration
?'"h~ '
.I rf~'f
l !~11\l
,t·
In this short cha pt er, we have looke d at th e use of Mu ltiply Divi de Eliminate
Creativity. In ad d ition to the case stud ies on the fol Weigh Destroy Concentrate
lowi ng pages, a h elpfu l list of ma n ipula tive verb s Flu ff-up Bypa ss Add
your ow n :
Relate Extr ude Repel
'-:11-=
--
Figure 7- 36
llOIJD.i.°ZdXH 8£ I
. .ct Q
/ e,~Jr1(V}..-I
£ 'ON Adn-4; -a91?
Figure 7- 38
8 Discovery
141
/'
,/
II.
/
I
(~ rnU(ffimfUaW
'WIT
/ +t-t\ Vl'U'v1 {(
/
~(LI ;;I(CI Crlcr c l I t ( ' ( ' (11«1]
fl
{1){.(
!
I
/
J~ R~d(-
\1TfITriiffiiJi
~
Figure 8-3 Leverage. Figure 8-4 Fastening.
Invention
David Pye w rote tha t invention "can only be done
deliberatel y, if the inven tor can di scern simi larities
be tween the par ticu lar result which he is en visaging
an d some other actual result wh ich he has seen and
stored in his m emory.... An in ven tor 's power to
in vent de pends on his abi lity to see ana lo gie s
between resu lts and, secondarily, on h is abi lity to see
th em betwe en devices. " 3 The ana logies ar e easily rec
\ognized in our everyday inv ent ions. If we lack a ham
'fIler to drive te nt stakes in to the ground , we gain an
Insight
\
to th e solution by seeing a tent pole se ction or
a ro ck at arm 's length an alogous to a hammer. Burrs
caught in she ep wo ol were the inspiration for Velcro
fasten ers, and the cooling effect of th e evap oration of
perspiration from our skin is the basis of the idea of
Figure 8- 5 Evap oratio n.
using semiporous containers to keep water cool.
14 2 Disc overy
1
- 0
<Sfv~ --1
Analogies
0
0 00
In hi s bo ok Sy nectics: Th e Developm en t of Crea tive
Capacity, W illiam G ordo n described fo ur typ es of
0 60
() analogy: sym bolic, dir ec t, personal, and fantasy.
~o-+ f nvrl"<;; The examp le of th e p itcher and the hou se as con
ta iners is a sym bolic analogy, a com parison between
general q ualit ies of the two objects. O ther sy m bo lic
an a logies m igh t be m ad e be tw een the sp read of a
han d and the extensions of a house or betwe en foot
prints and ca nopied pavi lions, w h ich loosely cons ti
tut e th e house. O ne of th e m ost pr om in ent examples
is the ana logy between the Latin cross an d the p lan s
of ma ny Got hic ch ur ches.
D ire ct analogy com pa res pa rallel facts or opera
tions . In the examples opp osite, the house is des igned
to have th e sam e co o ling chara cte ri stics as a tre e:
shade, eva pora tion , and air mo vem ent. And the roof
suppo rts for Nervi's ex hibition hall em ulate a hand
balan cing a tray.
In a personal an alogy, far right, the designer ide n
tifies h ims elf d irectly w ith the elem ents of th e prob
lem . Assum ing that th e p rim e consideration for this
house is wa rmt h and comfo rt on wi nter days w itho ut
large uses of no nr enew ab le energy sources, the
desig ner m igh t im agine h im self to be the house. To
ma ke h imself comf or table, he m ight lie clos e to the
gro und be low th e rid ge so th e cold w ind ca n pa ss
over his head. This can be trans lated in to a low -pro
file hou se below th e ridge w ith trays of space covered
by sloped glass skyl igh ts to ad m it th e war m rays of
the sun . W hen w e w ant to be hea rd at a d istance, w e
cup ou r hands to our mouth . The exte rior chape l at
LeCor b us ier 's pi lgrimage ch urch at Ron cha m p
adop ts sim ila r cuppe d sh apes to proje ct the p riest' s
C.V07 -:;' voice toward the con gregat ion .
144 D iscovery
(a)
(b) (b)
~rA
~
I
J
I
I
/
/
.;'
;'
.........
<,
-,
\
'\
\
/"
(b)
14 6 D iscovery
61Yvdura.\
ORG-AN\C
ANALOGIES
C ULTURAL
ANAlO G-IE6
Figure 8-11 Eight different types of analogy based on a hierarchy of syste ms.
Sources of Analogy
Of ten architects or design ers lim it their th in k ing
Th e possibl e mode ls fro m wh ic h to d raw ana log ies to stru ctural or me ch anical ana logies . The sa mp les of
can be classified by categories as p hysical, org an ic, or the ran ge of an alogy types, show n above, should sug
cu ltu ral, and th e su bc a tegories include: gest som e altern atives.
1. Structural- Referring to shape or rela tionship .
2. Mechanical- T he way something operates.
Increasing Effectiveness
3. Control-Maintain ing a cond ition . We have a ll exp er ie nced times w he n our m ind s
4 . Plant- Goal orientation and di ffer en tiat ion. ap p eare d fr oze n with a single thou ght that doe sn't
seem goo d eno ug h or is una ble to solve a cr itica l
5. A nimal- Behavior.
problem . A few spe cific app roach es that might help
6. Ma n- Imagination and choice .
thinking get moving again ar e shown on th e follow
7 . Society-Inter action , comp etition , organization . ing pages.
8 . Symbolic-Conventions, references , suggesti on .
148 Discovery
Concept Formation
Th e basic concept, some t im~s referred to as the patti,
is an enduri ng mechanism used by architectural
design ers to es tablish th e fundamenta l organization
of a building and guide the enti re p rocess of design
d ev elopment. T h e parti, at its best, p rovid es:
1. T h e first synthesis of the designer 's re sponse to
th e determinant s of for m (p rogram, obj ectives,
context, site, economy, e tc.).
2 . A bounda ry arou nd the set of decisions tha t will
be the focus of th e d esign er 's responsibility.
3. A m ap for fut ure de sign activities in the form of a
h ierar chy of valu es and responding forms.
4 . An image tha t arouses expectations and provides
mo tivat ion for all persons in volve d in the design
p r oces s. This is often done through the use of
a bs tr act ions. ("My buildi n g is a sp in e " or "O ur
building bridges this gap .")
The typica l parti sketch, lik e the one on th e left by
a fifth-year th esis st udent , shows both the d et er m i
na n ts and t h e b asic resolution of the form . In this
exa m p le , the sk e tc h of a floa ting resea rch sta tion in
the Atl a n tic O ce a n ill us tra tes the ve rtical pontoons Figure 8-14 By Mark Sowatsky. Parti sket ch. Atlantis 2.
secured by ca bles, supp orting a mu lt ilevel pl atform.
T h e b asic in te rac tion w ith w a ter, wind , and s un is
also ind ica ted .
The Ideagram
T h e sket ches t ha t have alread y b ee n described as
flowing from an alogies, kn own as ideogram s, ar e the
starting p oin t for concept forma tion. Ideagrams are
extensions of an alysis d iagrams that can be used as:
1. An aid to investigat ion a nd sy nt hesis in the d es ign
process.
2 . A fra m ew or k in the de sign thin kin g process that
lead s to the fin al de sign product.
3. A lite ral m odel of the fina l p roduc t. In architec
tur e th is is referred to as conce p tual clarity in th e
build in g.
4 . An exp la nation of a design con cept after the build
ing d esign has been completed .
To show some of the p oten tials of the id eagram
for d ev elop in g design concepts, I hav e drawn three
st ages of ev olu tion of a n ideagra m in th e fir st column
to the right. For ea ch stage, th ere is a sch ematic
de sign for a b u ild in g in th e n ex t column. Shown in
Ideagram 1 an d Design 1 is a literal tr an slation of the
ideagra m in to a bu ilding for m . T h is approach has a
clear and fo rcefu l impact on the us er ; the effect is Figure 8-15 (left) Three levels of development of an ideagram.
sim p le an d dramati c. In Ideagra m 3 and Des ign 3, a
Figure 8-16 (right) Corresponding schematic plans for the
build in g form is be in g de rive d from a mo re complex ideagrams.
ideagra m . The resulting b u ild in g m ay la ck the sim
p licity or in itial im pact of the first build in g , but in
tu rn it may offer a greater va riet y of exp er iences.
Th e Discovery Process 149
~I.J
,tn:t =
I Ii.. r
•
•
......~....l~;;;;a:
" /. .... •_ i I ,,\
Prototypes
As with oth er des ign ski lls, concept formation need
not be a mysteriou s process developed solely thro ugh
trial and erro r. There is a lot to be learn ed from archi
tects who are hig hly skilled at molding conc epts, and
here again ske tches can be an im porta nt aid . On the ~?ad ?\"+l
next pages ar e exa m p les of a nalytica l sk etches and
ab stract con cept-getti ng tec hniqu es fro m the w ork of Figure 8-17b Che ney Ho use 1904, Wright architect .
several architects.
The first exam p le s are fro m th e wor k of Fran k
Lloyd Wrigh t. In the hou ses know n as the Prairi e
Style, h e us ed a bas ic p lan of in terl ock ing spa ces
I.
domi nated by a cent ra l hear th with an elab orate,
indirect ro ute of entry. Alth ough the basic organ iza I·
I"
ti on al pa rti rem ai n ed constan t , Wrigh t 's carefu l I"
of houses, w e can try to us e Wright' s basic parti or ." . . .. "" '[1 It · · · . . , . . ' . ' .
de velop our ow n prototyp e p lan and m anipu late it in
~all/Slof~& 61te
res ponse to specific sit e con ditions.
150 D iscovery
Ca+~r"f It( ar
IlJ\ t\ ~b)(.
'[Jr-----4
~u-ttertb ~ 170x
•
• v//~//// /,/ // ~ .
• • • •
152 D iscovery
1·-siJ
O~PEROr
Rt'OM~
~ ~ Q 0Cl
Llnkta /·1 1. 1 \.-? 1·4
2D ~ CiJ rQr ~
AY'o()VI~ Coy! ?\ 3,'2. '7.:: ~4
~ ~ Eill ~f!1 ~
--------
EvJro ~~~ - 4.1 4.2 4 .~ 4 .4
l~ X+ltl o r:
[ 1 L
I :1 I 1
~ £QJ ~ @ ~
~
EkE E§j
Gi'ta r~
t:: "cetyl p.tGSI~
Co .l G,.'2
8J1 ©J
G, ·3
~
<;.4
In th eir bo ok T he Place of H ouses, Charles Moore, typ es. Th ere are a n um ber of other lists that ca tego
Do n lyn Lyndo n, a nd Ge ral d Allen explai n six d iffer rize ways of orga n izing bu ild ings; these co u ld a lso be
ent wa ys to orga n ize room s in a ho use and fou r d if p la ced in a m a trix to ge nera te ad d ition al alt erna tives .
fer e nt w ays to incorpora te m achi n es (by w hi ch they On the facing page, some of th e p rototyp es are devel
m ean w et an d se rv ice cores ) int o houses. In th e cha rt op ed in to co n cep ts for a house on our site , w ith in the
a bov e, I have constructed a matr ix rela ting th eir tw o constrain ts of th e specific bu ildi ng progra m .
lists of a lte rna tives to p rod uce 24 al terna tive p rot o
154 D iscovery
Fi gure 8-21a Three organizations of t he recreational house derived from t he matrix.
~
v'S
' ~~~ W lf ~~
• VleM.>$ ~ ~ ( ~ b~
_~ 1i4L----7
-
---7
•
~ (}" ,:~
t4, ~~""'CJ
.>
~ ~ 4; DHt~ ~VV'-
<.~
i., ~/5Iv'"j
~ iiJ l . P~
~
T I 1
Fi gure 8- 22
1 56 D iscovery
, -- - - - - ---~ -------
Whe n the desig ner is formu lat ing concepts for the
Plnl"3 ~ H'\ <:\TCJW1/I h o(}s ( A~rtrn~+
bu ildi ng design , he sp reads the collec tion of releva nt
u?ua. l~ C\AA 1I,. Jen or- r0ovY1 V1e ed ~1<j Icrf; ~ Cl¥""h-fbd cards or sh eet s on a table or wa ll. Patterns or mini
Ilfl W~ <t ~St2 e>-P exp:wc\ ~ "'S~. concep ts are then grouped as possible combina tions
an d observed, but the designer m ust go beyond a sim
pl y add itive pr ocess, In describing "pa ttern lan
guag e, " Ch ris top her Alexa nder exp lain ed that "It is
possi ble to put pattern s togeth er in such a w ay that
man y, many pa tte rn s ov erlap in the sam e physical
space : the buildi ng is ve ry dense ; it has many me an
ings captured in a small space; an d through this den
sity, it becomes pr ofo und . "7 To ac hi eve this sort of
synthesis, or "compression ," of pa tt erns, the graphic
think ing process can be applied, using cards or a clip
boa rd to turn ove r ideas as one scans th e disp lay of
Fi gure 8- 23 patterns.
CASESTUDIES this ch ap ter. In for ming the concep ts, ideas derived
fr om on e source are reworked to respond to othe r
Examples of id eagram s develo ped in to conc ept s for conc erns. Prototypes, for examp le, are adju ste d to fit
the rec reationa l house ca se s tud y ar e shown her e. th e site, or site-generat ed ideas ar e made to resp ond
Th e ideagrams, as you w ill re cognize, are taken from to th e buil d ing p rogram. Variations on th is ap proach
th e ana lyses of need , context, and for m in Cha pter 6 ar e illustrated in ad di tion al ca se stu d ies on t he fol
(a na lysis), fr om Ch ap te r 7 (expl ora tio n ), and fr om low ing pages.
Case Studies 15 9
091
sc-s aJn 5~:J
a -g aJn5 ~ :J
,
)
r,
V'l~
~ ~ '
;.\~
~~~. ~~
Fi gure 8-29 By Leonardo da Vinci . Studies of a tempo raty structure for festivals.
W verification re fers to t h e us e fu ln es s o f a
d esign conce p t for a spe cific p rob le m. T h e
u ltim a te m ea ns of veri fying the u tili ty of a
b u ild in g d e sign is a fir sth a n d ev al u a tion afte r th e
b u ild in g h as been con st r u c ted a n d occupied .
Evalua tions of the alte rn a tives a re then com pared.
3. Consolidation- T he eva lua tio n p rocess usu a lly
ge n e ra tes a great a mou n t of us ef u l in for ma tion in
ad d itio n to th e de cis io n a b out alt ern at ives. Th e
p urpose of consolid a tion is to try to inco rpora te as
How ev er, p ostoccu pa ncy evalu a tion w oul d be of n o m any good ideas as possi b le in to th e ch osen
h elp to th e many d eci sion s m ad e in th e pro cess o f sc he m e.
design ing an d b u ild ing . T herefore, a rc hitec ts us ua lly 4. Elaboration-Hav in g mad e a d es ign decision a t a
go thr ough a sor t of p rever ifica tion p roce ss. W it h in n ew lev e l of d e ta il, t h e im ages n ow sh ow th e
th is con tex t of pret estin g design con cep ts, th e u tilit y designer a w h ole n ew se t of con cerns fro m wh ich
of the ve r ifica tio n m od e of grap h ic th in king lies in h e m ust form new d es ign co nce pts. At th is p oin t,
moving from a bstract im ages to the more com p le te, th e recycl in g process is read y to sta rt again w ith
concre te im ages of th e design concept. art icul ati on of the new co n cep ts.
Verifica tion can be describ ed as a cycl ical process Th rougho u t the ver ificat ion process, th e ch oice of
p rodu cing im ages th at are in creasin gly spec ific or im ages m ust be deli be rat e if th e design er is to ma in
con cr et e. For exa m p le , the im age of a she lte ring roo f tain cont rol ov e r d es ign d ev e lop m e n t. Simp ly p u t,
is con ver ted in to a low, long-spa n hi p roof , la te r h av you can 't j u d ge th e p e r fo r ma n ce of somet hi ng yo u
ing exp ose d w ood trusses, an d then to a spe cific color ca n' t see. As Kirby Lock a rd pu t it, "If the co ncept is
w ith wood sh ingles. The oth e r p rog ress io n of im ages to p rov id e a ny p art ic u la r ki nd of spa tial or kin es
is from la rge r to sma ller pa rts of a bu ild ing. O ne o f th eti c experie nce , th e n th e re p rese n ta tive draw in gs
the keys to q uality d esign is th e a m oun t of a tte n tion mu s t b e eye -leve l p e rsp ec tives. Co n ce p ts th at are
given to th e relati ons hip of p a rt s, from th e b u ildi ng as ba sed o n som e d esired rel a tion sh ip to the p hys ica l
. a w ho le to th e most de ta iled leve l. Elie l an d Ee ro con tex t m us t be re p rese n ted in pe rsp ectives of that
Saar ine n w e re said to beli ev e tha t the su ccess of a ny co n text if th eir success or fai lure is to be evaluated .
pa rt of a b u ild ing d esign lay in th e stu dy of t he next Conc epts that are base d on pa rticu lar rela tionships to
sma lle r a nd next la rge r b uil d ing elemen ts ; design of a th e hu m an figur e m igh t be be s t represe nt ed in sec
good ro om requ ired the study of the fu rniture and of tions th a t sh ow th ose rel at ion sh ips. Any design solu
the bui lding as a w hol e. tion is best stud ied a nd evalua ted with those draw
T he m od el I use to exp lain th e cycl ica l process of in gs w h ic h b es t s h ow th e su cc ess or fa ilure of its
ve r ifica tion is s how n on th e facing page. T h ere a re con ce pt ual bas is. " I An d , the refo re, it is n ecessar y for
four bas ic stages: th e d esigne r to have a w id e ra nge of sketch ing sk ills ,
from abst ra ct to con crete , from loose to m eticu lous,
1. Articulation-The d es ign im age is exte n d ed a nd to understa n d th e spec ial pot enti al s of the d iffe r
th roug h represe ntatio na l ske tc hes of alte rna tiv e e n t im ages those ski lls pr od uce .
express ions of the concep t.
2 . Evaluation-The altern ati ve ex pressions of th e
design con cept a re test ed again st a se t of cr ite ria
16 3
far+tO
Figure 9-3a Three alternative expressions of the perspective.
4;-- Vltl.{}?
ll~ ~rt
--fLX1Ut"f
Pe(~eoh v e
I~ t1DD¥" 2M 1100\'"
1.: Figure 9-3b Three alternat ive expressions of t he plan.
I {J(dw
~ iJrud-urf
~nd :t=rool'" VYlcdtJ.e
"Z.o VllMf1
r1aV\
f'tl' F'rli t' Vl
/ - -f>C1XI<
~ ~po~oh Fi gure 9-3c Th ree alternative expressions of the section.
I~Vv+
7ed LOVi
Fig ure 9-2 A parti and three different forms of its articulation.
164 Verification
ARTICU LATION A number of other im p licatio ns of th e design con
cept are arti culated in Figur e 9-4. The y include such
To get a feel for the range of im ages that a re used to concerns as m assin g, scale, imagery, color, constru c
a r ti culat e a con ce p t , the three sket ches sh ow n in tion , flexi b ility, m ainten a nce, te rritor iality, and co m
Figure 9-2 ad d ress some fea ture of the design co n for t. Alth ough th e experie nced d esign er may n ot
cept. Th e qualiti es or ch a rac teristics illus tra ted a re need to look at a ll of these co nce rn s w ith in a given
noted for eac h ske tc h . In Figur es 9-3a, b, and c, th ree projec t, creat ive arc h itects ofte n use a sp ecific p rojec t
alt ern ative exp re ss ion s a re develope d for ea ch context to reexa mine accepted de sign norms.
ske tc h .
Articulation 165
-
-"
III_
Need
-.J L
-, I
~~ 0
~
<:::
.... ~
~~
(jJ N --->.
G-
@ • ® CoMWl I.Jl')tll Sp::!Cf (a)
Z
• @ fnva Oj
tn
(!) • @ O nelrtt4LOI1 ro
'\J
® • • C wcvlat 1011
• • • Etr.evg tJ CdJ'6e hja -r 0 Y!
® • ACC£iWlO detfWh "p~lLb~ S
(c)
@ • H-1er avchtj
@ • • Unrty /6l\l\l\ \? k .rty 0
7'ij
@ • @ 6 C41t: $
@ • • MeMor-abk IV\ll, ~3.e
• • • "R<.j?r.tSSL6 V\ 0+' WlAcfl.d16
Figure 9-7a Evaluation of th ree perspective alternatives.
16 8 Verification
i~S
~""",---'-+"-~; ~f
:',r\\
~.,....,.......,.,-,""......,,..,. ' \
A chart, such as the on e opp osite, is used to com Mak ing notes d uring the processes of eva luat ing
pare evaluations pf the al te rna tive s (see the followi ng and comparing th e a lternatives is usefu l to furt her
pag e) . It lists d esign ev a lua tion crite r ia und er th e und erstan d th e st ren gt hs a nd wea k nesses of these
headings of need , cont ext , and for m . For ea ch head al ternatives. In th is m ann er, th e d esign er ca n often
in g, the criteria are listed in or d er of im p or ta nce, id entify th e best ideas and expa nd on them with the
starting from th e left, therefore ac cou n tin g for prio ri inform ation d iscovered thro ugh the d isplay.
ties. Alte rnatives I , 2, and 3 are rated as p rovidi ng a
superior or average re spo nse to ea ch cri terion; blan k
ar eas in d icate no specific response. This chart allows
an over all view of the success of each alternative.
Evaluation 169
Cost Benefit
O the r exa mp les of grap h ic im a ge s us ed to as sis t
eval uation appear on these two pages. The dia gra m
sh own to the r ight is a n ex tension of analysis te ch
C~
Aof(17o,
. 11 •
ill ~
t;]
••
@]I§ ID
I
• •••
~ ElEi rn
•
f V\d~q I
I I
n iq ue s de ve lope d by the a r ch ite ctu ra l firm of I I I I
I I
Oecb I I
•• III• *•
Ca udi ll Row lett Scott ." T he relati ve size of building I I I
areas and their approxim a te co sts are shown s ide by
sid e , p rov id in g a n ov e rv iew of th e rel ati on ship
A(m III
be tw e en p rogram n eed s and co s ts useful to bo th
cli ent and design er.
C0t
Figure 9-8 Di splay of cost -benefit analysis.
•
~t: ?
~~.
_____
t3......
·W~ !
r - --7 -r
')
I
"" I
U I I " I I \ ~~~
~i ~ ;t-
~J
~ 5~
/
./
Drawing Evaluation
app roach is also appl ica ble to finishe d d raw in gs by
Persp ect ives are so co m mo nly used as sellin g to ols p ro fessiona l rend erers or even p ictures of bu ild ings
th at an exam ination of the p ersp ective ab ove might by professional ph otograp hers. Concep tual dr aw ings
help to emphasize its pote n tial as an evaluation tool. can also be evaluated by red ucin g th em to ide agram s
Here, the perspect ive is fir st rend ered w itho u t co n that poin t up th e clarity or consisten cy of th e design
scious att en tion to the design of spa ce. The d raw ing is con cep t.
now exa m in ed for cl u es to s hor tcom ings. Th is
1 70 Verificati on
CONSOLIDATION
r-----II)! I
Figure 9-11 Selecting useful ideas and combining them.
Consolidation 171
I •
~~? rMill
v~
Figure 9-13 Identifying parts for further developemt.
ElABORATION
W ith the basic d esign d ecisions made an d cla rified,
pr eparation is under way for the next cycles of ver ifi
cat ion . Dec isions at one level of des ign op en up ma ny
p r oblems at ot her level s. For exam p le , fix ing th e
de sign of a room ma kes it pos sible to study w indows,
floo ri ng , m ech ani cal sys te m s, sto rage un it s, and a
num ber of sp ecial it ems such as fir ep lace or so la r
iu m . Conce p ts fo r each of the parts are devel op ed
wi th in the context of th e design of the w ho le ro om .
Bu t ea ch concep t in tu rn can be verified by repe at ing
th e me thods de scribed earl ier in thi s chapter. Figure 9-14 Developing det ails.
Elaboration 17 3
-
~~l f~tM~
~=----- Pbhlb\
-;:/~
11 1 1
~
W '/
~ tD~
11
Details
- 0-
I~ I h~
~
fit togeth er? Detail sketches p lace the design under a
sort of mi crosco p e. The sample sketches on th ese two
pages show, through th e different vi ews, the im por
ta nce of h ow som e thi ng is put toget her a nd how it
- i--
~t'Vt<JV 1n\'V1
- --
~ ?<;S
sh oul d look. Addi tionally, the up -close d raw ings or
sketches m ust show the context for th e deta il.
17 4 Verification
VERIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE em bod ies littl e of th e rationa le of th e origina l con
cep t. Sim ilar cl ic h es ca n be fo u nd w ith in both th e
One of the advantages of expe rience in d esign is th e Mod ern and Post-Mo d ern mo vemen ts. Typ ical com
opportu nity to ve rify d esign co nc ep ts when th e b uild m ercia l faca d e restorations seem the most suscep ti
ing is constr ucted . The designer accu m ulates a men ble to th e use of these cliches.
ta l st ore of th e concep ts he has verified firsthand ; he
k now s wh at wor ks a nd w ha t d oes n ' t. In ad d itio n ,
w it h a certain am ou n t of con fiden ce, he can gen eral
ize new concep ts fr om w ha t h e has lea rn ed and
j ud ged . As a resu lt , m a n y d ecis ion s ca n be m ad e
m ore q uickly, facilita t ing the de sign p roc ess.
Ho w ever, an a bility to judge ca n som eti m es d ete
riorat e to th e level of ha bit , and the des ign er ma kes
decisions be fore looking at the d esign pr oblem . The
re peated use of spec ific co ncep ts, techn ol ogies, or
m ate ria ls may lead to in approp riate p reconcep tions
for the given p ro ble m . Ma ny creative arch itects regu
larly re test acc epted d esign co nc ep ts; th ey are con
sta nt ly looking at their ideas, testing th em , and evo lv
ing new co nc epts.
More seriou s is the use of concep ts d eve lop ed by
other s wi thout a thoroug h u nderstanding of the ir ori
gin and d erivation . This may often be a su bc on scious
effect of a d esigner 's exposure to existing p ro totyp es
an d in fluences. The large ove r ha ngi ng eaves of Fra n k
Lloyd Wrigh t's Pra irie sc ho olhouses have bee n im i
tated w idely to the poin t of be co m ing a cl iche. T he
typical app lication of these eaves to sub ur ban houses Figure 9-16
Q ¢. ~ <;)
IT rrn ~ 1f1I n BE
I I II " " 11.
UlJ. I ~ ~~
~ ce.
/ \ ~ .r, MA-f>-Tl tJ-SoN ~
I fl/llj) I
t-- ~ r >-- 0 f
! !( ~
Figure 9-17a Mo dern movement cliches.
BUILD
CLIENT CONTRACTOR
~~ -~ ~ - ~ ~~~ ~ ~
10 Process
n th is sec tion , w e cons ide r th e curre n t and 1 . Cha nge in the co ncep t of clie nts to incl ud e build
179
c,vrtr~
fY~jVaM f- XhtMaTlG
Ve~3Y\
f-
frtll VV\ 1Y\tu'8
Ve~VI
I-- ~~V'
!7eve of~~
~
{7oev~tV\t?
~
~p
1A--t{v)I~
I--
UM&frvchOh
?mblem
Ve·flV\ rt lot')
17eve(~»g
Alternafl\}R6
~"I vtth r'."l
A!-ttrntth VetJ
~-?Lled ID\'I H u".", u.,ar/lon]
180 Process
· processes.
Figure 10-4 An application of the pro blern -solvinq
INCcMING 0Uffi0 1~ G
~C1<'rvn ()N ~lvn oN
~
~
8G5Cvv~ ,
~
~D~u~ u
I D p~VL I I ObS-e-rve. ] ! Ol:>~e I
Figure 10-5 Design process models. Fig ure 10-6 Process drawings.
18 2 Process
~ .c, ~ s: ~
!<fi ~
" ~ '"
FJ -+ ~
~ -5
'"
~ ~ s:
'"
>
~ ~ ~
~ t
...<:> 'S
J -r ::::: c:s
.Pr-(7~ (O \'Y1
De0l.6V\ P.ev'elopi'Ylt'nt
Figure 10-7 Matrix diagram of relationships between stages of Figure 10-8 Examples of sket ches at different stages of a design
the design project and different modes of graphic thinking. project.
APPLYING GRAPHIC THINKI NG The following ch apt ers con sider some of the prac
ti cal p rob lems of creati ve th inking e ncoun te red by
Although th e draw ings that sum up each stage in the p eople w it hin th eir d esig n co n texts. I try to show
de sign pr ocess vary from abst ra ct sk etches a t th e how som e of the grap hic th inking too ls h ave bee n
begin ni ng to the most spec ific hard -line drawings at help ful to architects and desi gn ers, but the real te st of
the end, th e thi n king process can be supported the usefu lness of th ese tools has to be m ade w ithin
throug hout by the d iffer ent types of ske tches pre the context of the sp ec ial des ign pro cesses ea ch of us
sen ted in the p revi ous chapters. T he m atrix ab ove develops.
shows where the mo de s of grap hic thinkin g ar e pri
m ari ly us efu l. To th e ri gh t ar e some examp les of
sketches that co uld be used at ea ch of the stages in
th e design process.
A\3 'ST~ACT
'R{;'Pf<l::SE.NTA11DNAL [3l81EE1mD~
---
/'
(IJ
~ ----
abstract , conc ep tual processes and th e ap p lica tio n of
percep tua l gr ap h ics s uc h as per spectives to concrete,
represent ation al tas ks. Bu t we a re on ly be ginning to ~
~ ----
exp lore th e p oten tial use of pe rcep tual grap h ics in th e
m or e p r iva te d esign p r oc esses a n d th e use of dia
gr a mma ti c lan gu ag e for th e m ore pub lic task s. T he
rapid growt h of com p u ter graphics sh ould sp rea d th e
use of both p erce p tual a nd di agra m matic graph ics ;
-
on th e on e h an d , concr e te , perceptual draw ings wi ll
Figure 10-11 Three-dimensional diagram.
be p ro d u ced in a fra ction of th e ti m e they now take ;
on th e o the r h an d , d iagramm ati c com m u nic at io n
wi ll be so ac cessibl e that it w ill be co mmo nplace.
184 Process
Figu re 10-12 By Raymond Gaetan. Computer
model view.
I!:-~\
' I • I
. ~_ . ~"" . ,, '1,
,' r. ~ ~
J
. r. " f) ....'
• A '
- .,( ( I\,..j.," . ". ~~~ •
._ ~_ y
• .J:-,;:--'.
< s- , ~ . " r -..'
j ~'
Lo , . / /;j . ; _J,.J" : 'iii.. .:. \\' ,,\ I
~I. t-\
--~t
.1 '~ .,.). ~
..,~ :~
, "", IA
N"~~'
'"
) ':'
"
~
"
~
,/
L- -' ' . ,- ' .. ' ,.,
; ;
,,, . . ., .. I"
....... 0 "'('I
A/_ "7
'
\. J ,
.
~. '
,"ii " ",~",,- . ... ~.
'. '.
, :"
t'
~J
'" - $ ,,'
l ' ~j~
J, '
-I" I f'
. ) "l+-/::~ )
~, '! "'i :, l' _.
. ~ -. - -·'tf' 1 L
'0 ' '. H - -":
~. ~
:Il
~
11""- \
. ./," _~ .., -T ';r-
~~
~- ~ ,.. ... .. ,'
"'lr' ·- '
J ,,,
r
~~ -------
\
Figure 11-2 (bottom) By David Stieglitz. Buffalo Wate rfront Redevelopment Proje ct.
11 Individual Design
....-...,
.J
........
189
~
Figure 11-5 Drawing instruments.
PREPARATION FOR DESIGNING defor m ing of the point. Look for the pens wi th the
darkest bla ck in k.
Although thoughts can be represented graphically by Extra-fine-po int rollerball- These us ed to p roduce an
using a great number of me d ia (and there are whole un ev en or unreliable line , but have been great ly
books devot ed to these di ffere n t m ed ia ), eac h improved and have a longer-last ing supp ly of ink.
designer must find m a terials and instr umen ts wi th
For good res ults, the d rawing instr um ent m ust be
which he w ill be most com fortable. It is w orthwhi le
mat ched wi th the ri gh t p ap er. Alt ho ugh th e liq uid
to experim en t w ith the se di fferent tools. They should
cartrid ge pen works on mos t pap ers, no np orou s,
be eas y to use and m ai n ta in, and th ey shou ld be
sm ooth-fi n ish pape r is th e m ost adap ta ble fo r all
portable . Per sonally, I prefer pens to p encils because
pen s. I buy cheap , wh ite 8 1h -by-ll ph otocopy pape r
the y produce a high-con tra st im age, mak ing consis
in SOO-sh eet pac kages. My test for a n a cce p ta b le
ten t lin e qu ality easy. T hey are p erma n en t , whi ch
m a tch of pen and paper is w hether th e pe n can be
d iscourages th e tim e-consuming habits of erasing or
m ove d qui ckly in an y d irection without ca tchin g or
redraw ing. I ha ve found four types of pen that meet
sk ipp ing.
my needs:
Many architects get good resu lts wi th soft pe nci ls
Liquid-ink ca rtridge pen-Using perm an ent, jet blac k
or colored p en cil s, a nd so m e co m bine m ed ia .
ink; it prod uces a sm oot h, q uick line. Most po ints
Everyone's in terest s and thin king di ffer, so eac h per
w ear ou t even tually, so I use cheap p ens w ith fine
son shou ld tr y to find a sim p le bu t eff ec tive m ed iu m
rounded points and ke ep sever al handy in case
for th eir personal gr aphic think ing .
one w ears out.
Pointed felt -tip pen-T h is us ed to be the m ost com m on
type of felt- tip . It has the ad vantage of provid ing a
second line w eigh t by using the side of the point, ENVIRONM ENT
but th e ink oft en th in s out, resulting in less shar p
images. It is cur ious th at ar ch itects, whose p rofession is con
Fin e-point felt-tip pen-Many of these p ens have a th in cern ed with suiting environments to needs, spend lit
m etal tube that greatly reduces the wear and tle tim e stud y ing the environm ent in w h ich they
w or k. Robert McKim provi des us wit h a good p lem ent th eir ow n s ty le of thin kin g. I find th at my
descr iption : ow n de velopm ent m ak es m e res ponsive to eve rything
visible. I support concentra tion by using a clea r desk
A visual-thinking environment for one person should
wi th a blank w hite vertical sur face direc tly in front of
be as well-designed as a contempora ry hi tchen.
m e. O the r de signers may need a very s tim u la ting
Work areas should be well illum inated, preferably
envi ronm ent for thi n king.
w ith natural north light and with out shadow or
glare. The drawi ng surface sho uld be large and
adj ustable in height and angle. A n additional stand
up table should be ava ilab le for three-dim ensional MENTAL/PHYSICAL CONDITION
work; spilled glue and knife ma rks soon spoil a
drawi ng surfa ce. Organized storage should be pro Th e right materials and environme nt m ust be accom
vided close to each work area to diminish distracting panied by a good m ental and p hysical state for th e
clutter. Chairs an d stools should provide back sup indi v id ua l to th ink or solve problem s effecti ve ly.
port in a wo rk ing position. To alleviate back tension Eve ryone is su bje ct to tension and stress in th eir
and also to provide for the importa nt element of work, and this is esp ecially tru e of p racticing arch i
change, a stand-up, verti ca l draw ing su rface should tects. Experienced architects try to pace th emselves
be available: a black board, ease l, or wall- m ounted because th ey know that m istakes are m ade under
roll of paper. A large tack- space is needed for dis excessiv e pressu re. Freq ue nt exe rcise and re creation
playing current idea ske tches . A lthough admittedly are a bas is for a good m ental state , bu t designers can
an affront to those who associate productive work also take specific m ea sures to improve th eir prepara
with open eyes and erect position, the visua l thinker tion fo r w or k . Relax eyes by closing, the n ro ta ting
should also ha ve access to a qui et place wh ere he the m ; ease neck tension by sitting up right w ith bac k
can relax and tum his thoughts inw ard- or stop suppo rted and slow ly bend t he head forw ard , ba ck
think ing entirely: a reclining chair, a couch- even a wa rd, and to ea ch side in a cir cular mo tion; relax the
relaxing bathl' w hole bod y by stretching and deep breath in g.
Arc hitects and designe rs sho uld consciously sel ect
the visua l environm ent in w hi ch they work to com
r - -'
\
;.l--' '-, J
,
- __ ___.,
--::,
PRIVATE TO PUBLIC THINKING they of te n represen t incom p let e tho ugh ts. Bu t these
sketch es also re veal the str uggle of a m ind tha t does n' t
Thin king and th e communica tion it m ay req u ire ha ve have all th e answ ers. For som e design ers, this m ight be
tw o mode s. In th e p ublic m od e, the individ ua l devel embarrassin g beca use of a n illusion tha t th e gre a t
op s hi s id eas by com m u ni ca tin g wi th oth er p eop le, design concepts flow instan tly a nd com p le tely from
Co lin C he rry p o in ts ou t th a t "Co m m u ni ca tion is th e crea tive m ind . Bu t p e rh ap s t h e re is m ore to it.
essen tia lly a soc ia l affair.,.. The ve ry word comm uni Co n cep tu al ske tc h es ar e ve ry p e rson a l s ta te m e n ts,
cate m eans share, an d in asmu ch as you a nd I a re com almost a d ia ry. We are intuit ively aw a re th a t th ey can
m un ica tin g a t th is mo m e nt , w e a re one.... W h at we reveal ve ry p r iva te feel in gs, concerns, or fan tasies.
sh a re , w e can n ot eac h have a s our own po sses They are no one else 's b usi ne ss.
sian .. .. " I In thi s se nse, the re is a p ublic aspect to all
Although indiv idual design activity re quires both
ideas beca use non e of us lives in a vacuum. Wha t we
pu b lic an d private co m m un ica ti ons, the cho ice of
hol d in our m inds com es fr om in teracti ons w ith th e
mode is pe rson al. Ea ch d esign e r develo ps h is ow n
peopl e and environ men t tha t su rr ound s us ,
style of sketchin g as an aid to thin king, Some m ay
In the p riva te m od e of t hinking , th e in di vid u al choose to develop a clarity th at can comm u nicate to
develops ideas in isola tion from othe rs; com m un ica other p eop le , while ot h e rs may d evelop a p r iva te
tion in th is for m is d irect ed bac k tow a rd on ese lf. graph ic lan guage. Eith e r w ay, yo u h ave to be comfor t
Many arch itec ts ar e re lu c tant to sh ow th e ske tch es a ble with it. If yo u can enjoy sket chi ng, ch an ces ar e
th ey use to d eve lop id eas, a nd some even have d iffi thinking w ill a lso b e m ore enjoyab le.
cu lty d iscussin g th e m , Th ese ske tc he s a re te n ta tive
and cr ud e com pare d to p rese ntat io n d ra w in gs, an d
O~fA6Lt 1.
Figure ll-l1a
~f,AC l£
w ithout a formal ki tch en . It may not be a solu tion ,
but it m ight lead to a solution . Z
Figure ll-l1 b
-
•
a ct ion. Spelling ou t the av ai la ble altern a tives an d
the n comp aring th em in ligh t of a few bas ic cr ite ria
can fac ilita te choices. Rep resent ing crite ri a and t he
B • ra tings of alternatives in graphic image s makes it p os
G
... .. sible to nave a picture of the inf orm ation need ed to
decide .
~IACL£ S,
Figure ll -ll e
~TA CL t- 4.
Figure ll-ll d
Q Q Q Q
~~.:S~~4
--4~~1
? 1
>~J-.4
6
1 1
b 0'6
Figu re 11-12 The lifetime context of the individual design project process.
DESIGN AS A LIFETIME PROCESS writing pad , to jot down ideas, visual impre ssions and
an ecdotes. T hese sketchbooks, of w h ich th ere are
Des ign me thodo logy has some di fficult ies, such as its m ore than sev enty covering th e wh ole of
focus on the single p roject and p resen ting a rather LeCorbusier 's life, w er e in themselves a significant
m ech ani cal m odel of design w or k . It gives th e ad d itio n to Jea nneret's developm ent, for they became
im pression that the inform ation is poured in at the a ne w me d ium of exp ression and a source-book for
beginning and at stra tegic p oin ts along th e w ay ; then later id ea s." Je n cks goes on to qu ote LeCorbu sier:
the machine , call ed logical tho ught, grinds an d ch ew s "W hen one travel s a nd wor ks w it h visu al th ings
the inform atio n , expe lling an ap propr iate product at architecture, pa inting, sculpture- one use s one' s eyes
the end . The ac tual co mplexity of the design process and dr aws , so as to fix de ep down in one 's experience
mi ght be better u nd ers tood if we ima gin e the what is see n . O nce th e im pression has been recorded
machine as hav ing several sw itche s to m ake the ind i by th e p en cil, it stays for goo d , en tered , re gistered,
v id ua l par ts stop a nd go , sp eed u p , or slow do w n. inscribed . " 5
Fur therm ore , each sw itch has a control that flips th e
Creative ar chitects oft en bec om e fascinated with
sw itch ba ck an d forth at ra nd om . Th ese controls rep
a particul ar pr oblem or form that they mull over for
resen t the action of the h um an m ind w ithin a design
many years , drawn tow ard w hat they feel are funda
p rocess, fo r o ur m in ds are co ns tan tly active and
mental ideas or concerns. For exam ple, Wright p ur
reacting to a w hole environ m ent surroundin g a spe
sued many notion s in h is lifetim e re garding su ch
cific projec t. In many cases, the design pro cess of a
things as plan or ganization , str ucture , and materials,
su ccessful arc hi te ct becom es unde rstandable w hen
which he could pull together in a single desi gn such
seen as one sma ll part of the ar ch itect 's life. His
as the Kaufm an House at FaIling Wat er. In effect, the
de sign p ro cess is gov ern ed by p att e rn s of tho ught ,
success of thi s house is the result of ve ry th orough
in terests, and values that are con stantly evolving.
re se ar ch over a good portion of his career.
G ra phic thinking can be a significant aid to such
de velop m ent. Cha rles Je ncks n oted of LeCorbusier,
"He st ar ted kee p ing a sketch boo k, a pocket-si zed
19 8 Individual De sign
Fi gure 11-13 The accumulation of design concepts in buildings
by Frank Lloyd Wright.
_---~t-:JIUJL1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I
L-r-; -~
- - ' ,I II !
~ __--l ] - bUD .
DJ
Figure 11-14 Combination of the previous elements using new materials in a new context .
~
~ "'--- v
v..
Figure 11-15 Elevati on sket ch. Guggenheim Museum.
The careers of cur re n t and fu tu re d esign ers w ill 2. An exp anding variety of document al-on choices in
be signific ant ly infl uen ced by d igi ta l m ed ia. If w e p rint, vi deo , and projection form ats.
keep in mind the impli cations of d esign as a life time 3. U n p reced en te d resources for achievi ng and
proc ess- the pe rsiste nce of ideas and the stim ula tion retrieval of a full range of visual im ages.
of a kn ow led ge bas e - d igita l me d ia p romise a
tre me nd o us op portun ity. Sign ifi can t n ew tool s Th e imp act of th ese new ca pa bili ties is d ir ectl y
in clude: propor tional to our ability to co n nect graphic im ages
w ith th ou ght p rocesses.
1. An imp ressive array of illu stra tion tool s in obje ct
and pixel-based comp uter grap hic ap plica tions.
)
/
/
I
/
12 Team Design
TEAMCOMMUNICATION
203
PfRF EC T
E'XCFUEN T
o
l'AIWi<E
-':'·;$Z:'
130
'?TR E N &Tt+ IS
;/
~ ~~ 6'e+buts
s
~
· ----4 -'
Ve h ~cv ( ar- AUt~ ~ ':;rtt
1bt:'"
il ~ WJ1:r ft
1. br.". fr~ (J~1lr 1J
0 00 0 ° 1 ° 0 0 0 0
000 00 00000
OO O O DI[)O OOD
0 0000 D OOOO
, ~- - ~--
; , '. I
( I ' \
m \Thb:l~
\ '. \ " d!mD ,
"
.
I \ .. ~
'; \ '\ ...
..._d
____IQ ')
.
N
__- . . . 1.9---
Figure 12-7 Analysis card examples.
e
E G
A V Ii
c, F
t?A~CHA~'-
NETWoRK
TEAM DESIGN PROCESS-M AKING A NETWORK Networks ca n become qui te el a bor ate if th ey
include the m ost minute tasks, but I prefer to keep
W hen many p eople must work toge ther, it is often them sim p le in or d er to concen trat e on the most
helpful to make a flowc hart of all th e task s and where basic activitie s. This sim ple netw ork bec om es a sort
the y fit in the context of the enti re project. These net of rack on wh ich to hang descriptio ns of inf ormation
works evol ved from sim ple ba r cha rts , which s how a need ed for d ifferent task s. Since complex bu ildings or
sim ple sched ule of ta sks. By sh ow in g th e necessary complex desi gn p roce sses requ ire ch anges in tea m
seq uenc e of tas ks , the basi s is laid for an elementary composition at di fferent project stage s, a ne twork is
netw ork . also a h andy w ay to ident ify points at which sp ecial
exp ertise is needed .
EVOLVING TEAM TECHNIQUES Ma k ing u sefu l and p ra ctica l adva nce s in team
th ink in g de pends on the qu al ity of rela tion sh ip s
Tea m thi n king is a n evolv ing area of resea rch a nd amo ng the team m em b e rs. A few su gges tion s may
cr eati vit y. New approa ches are con tin ua lly tested , help:
a nd v is ual co m m u n ica tio n co u ld play an impor ta n t
1. Accept eac h oth e r 's co n tr ibu tion to the sit ua tion
role in realizing the poten tial of teams. As tech nologi
as h av in g eq ual p ot en t ial.
ca l advances (gra p h ic sim u la tio n a nd reprod uctio n )
a re made , th e spe ed of grap h ic m ani pu la tio n and 2. Place pe rso nal goals bel ow team goals .
feedba ck is great ly in creased . Real- time , la rge-screen 3 . H e lp each othe r by conce n trating on each me m
v ide o projectio n , pract ical th re e-d im ensiona l com ber 's inpu t.
p ut e r grap h ic m ode lin g , and la se r-d is k v is u a l 4. Have your se nse of h umor ready a nd use it.
libra ries will p rov ide unpreced e n ted vi sual tools. T he
possibilities are in d eed exci ting .
~-----7
~ -----7
~---- -'>
~ -----7
~-- - --7
~----~
lV\()\j e M1?NT
§o~
tIJ ~ ]J
~CC5
8?D
f~1
( IMAGINATION) ( CIRCULATION )
e
·\\·:· · ·~ · ·:
( COMMUNICATION ) :. « ~ "
/. , ::;--~~ ;.: '" > ,: ~', .
( ENTERTAINMENT ) ( RELAXATION)
1NTR000000 ON
ANAL YSIS
CONTEXT PROGRAMMATIC
OBJECT IVES
CONTEXT
PROCESS
FORM
RESULT S
FEASIBIUT Y
DESIGN
ANALYSI S
EXPLORAT ION
COMPARISONS
ALT ERNATIVES
CONCLUSIONS
PROPOSAL RECOMMENDATIONS
13 PubLic Design
he gen eral public is takin g a m ore active role tion ; te lecom m u nica tio ns ; m ini com pute rs ; ene rgy
Figure 13-2
2 17
(a) (b)
A
-,1,1;:-r \
r10
". I
\: I
1-
\ ! r. -.'
1_ -_i ' ::
, 'I
lr: >
(.: iI _' ii ': ',
r, I-
I : :. -~ ! , ':
l , I
I . -I r:.-·
'\' , i _' ',y
i:' ; }
/
\, :;-..-;i
\'V l
,
,I •
,I
,I
/
I
/
f§ i \
Figure 13-4 Freehand drawing done over a drafted version.
2 18 Public D esign
Figu re 13-6 By Harry Eggink . East Cambridge residential
neighborhood.
;;s ~~~/ b
~
-¢--,
~~ vu- P""
@
if4}>
:-P)..~~
V" e-,
........ .......
".. . ;.. -~. "'::> -
":;:-~~ ,,;
-,.....
,.~,-
~~ . ,
7 ~.
<i.
,"
."
-,
-I
~
1 <.
t-- '1
~-
\
I,
I
~,,.
) I
{Ii -~
{\
~I f--'L/ \ -~-~--~:J
~ - - Jl1.
/1 -
I '
I:
i
I ,
.l ~ l ~~ 1\r
I -
~
¥uOL- _~~~-
{p /
..'
Figu re 13-18 By Harry Eggink. Site form investigation. Figure 13-19 By Harry Eggink. Site study.
-,
"
j '>-'to
,i )
"" - ,-'
- ( - ~ '--..",r - ...
<..~ f - "?\
-,-'.
T 1\'\
\\
I
\
~;- J/./\
- t -~ -- -,
/
/
WORKING SKETCHES Figure 13-20 By Harry Eggink . Elkh art, Indiana, urban design
study.
In an attemp t to involve community m em bers in the
de sign pr ocess, design er s of ten deve lop id eas an d
d raw in gs in a p u blic, accessib le space. Exp lor ator y
d raw ings can b e an effective means of in formally
e liciting the p arti cipa tion of the co m m un ity . These
sketches may u se fam iliar d raw ing con ven tions w hi le
staying loose in style.
-"
'1-
:-..\ \1//..
.,, \/J/
~ -o -'
d~ ::-II \ \
~
Re gional Se Uing
14 Conclusion
rch itectu re and the ot he r art s h old a vital Visual com m unicat ion is in the midst of sw eeping
231
-
UOIs n[:JlIO:J z£z
"Mil!,' ]ilPOW rainduioj 'ilJOOW U e lj ~ e N '\ 8 E-'7I ilm6~::l
•
THE CHALLENGES
Fig ure 14-5 Devel opment sket ches, Hammonds Resid ence, House
+ House, archi t ect s.
234 Conclusion
•
1. Fro m "T h e Nee d of Percep tio n fo r th e Percep tion of 3. Loc kard , Wi lli am Kir by . D esign Drawing. Tu cs o n , AZ:
Needs, " keynote sp eech by Dr. H e in z Von Foers te r deli v Pep pe r Publishing, 197 4 , p . 124 .
e re d at th e 197 5 Na tio n a l Co n ve n tion o f th e Am erican 4 . Ja coby, He lmut. Architectura l Drawings. New York: Pra ege r
Ins titu te of Ar chi tects, At lan ta , Ge orgia. Pu b lishe rs, Inc., 1965.
5 . G u nde lfinge r, O n-the-spot D rawing, p p. 6 1- 62 .
Chapter 1
6. Lockard , Design D rawing, p . 26 2.
Broadbent , G e off rey ,. D esign in Arch itectu re. New York :
Joh n Wil ey & Sons, Inc., 1973, p . 34 3.
Chapter 4
2 . Ha m ilton , Edward A. Graph ic Design for the Com puter Age.
Ne w Yor k: Van Nostra nd Reinho ld Company, 1970 , p . 16. 1. Bonta, J ua n Pablo . "Notes for 11 Semiot ic Theory of G rap h ic
La ngua ges. " Pap e r p re se n te d to th e Int e rn a ti o na l
3. M c Kim , Rob e r t H . Experi en ces in Visual T hink ing. Conf er ence on Semioti cs, Ulm , Ge rm an y, 1972.
Monterey, CA: Brooks/C ole, 1972 , p . 22.
2. McKim , Experiences in Visual Thin hing, p . 12'1.
4 . Arnheim , Ru do lf. Visual Th inki ng. Ber keley : Un iversit y o f
Californ ia Pre ss, 1969, p . 13, 3. Bruner, Jerome. On Kn ow ing, Essays for th e Left [fu nd.
Camb rid ge , M A: Be lk n a p Pre ss o f 1Jd( vard Un ive rs . t y
5. Arn heim , Rudo lf "G esta lt Psyc ho logy and Artistic Form ." Press, 1962, p . 123.
I n A spect s of Form , e d ite d by La n cc lo t Law Wh yt e .
Bloomi ngto n : Ind ia na U n ive rsity Press, 1966 , p . 20 3. 4. Arnh eim , "Ges ta lt Psyc ho logy and Arti stic Fo r. u . . p . 20'1.
6. McKim , Exp eriences in Visual Think ing, p . 40 . 5. Brun er , On Kn ow ing: Essays for the Left l Iand, p. 182 .
7. Arn heim, "Gesta lt Psy ch ology a nd Ar tistic For m ," p . 206. 6. McKi m , Experiences in Visual Think ing, pp. 1-2 1 1-26 ,
237
Chapter 7 3. M cKim , Experien ces in V isual Th inking, p. 127 .
1. Koeb erg , Don, and Bagna ll, J im . Th e Universal Traveler. Los 4 . Cherr y, Colin. On H um an Com m unication. Ca m b rid ge, MA:
Altos , CA : Wi lliam Kau fm ann , Inc., 1976 . p . 9 . M IT Pr ess, 1966, p . 4 .
2 . McKim , Exp eriences in Visual T hinking, p . 45. 5. J e n c ks, C ha rles. LeCo rb usi er and the Tra gic V ie w o f
A rchitectur e. C a mbr idge, MA: H arva rd U n iversity Pres s ,
3. Row an , H elen . "T h e Creat ive Peo p le : H ow to Spo t Them ." 1973.
THIN K. New Yor k : IBM Corp. , N ov.- Dec. 1962 , vo l. 28 ,
no 10, p . 15.
Chapter 12
4 . Webst er 's New Wo rld D icti ona ry .
1. Broa d be n t, D esign in A rchi tectur e, p . 358 .
5. March , Lionel , and Stea dman, Ph ilip . T he Geom etry of
En vironment. Lon d on: RIBA Pu bli cation s Limited , 1971, p . 2. Caud ill , Will ia m W. A rchitecture by Tea m . Ne w Yor k: Van
28 . Nostrand Re in h old Co m p an y, 197 1.
6. Bee by, T ho mas H. "T he Gra m m ar of Orna m en t/O rn am ent 3. For a d escr ip tio n of brai n sto r m in g m e thod s, see G or d on ,
as Gram m a r." VI A II1, T he Jo u rn al of the Grad ua te School W illi am J. Synetics: Th e Developme nt of Creative Cap acity.
of Fine Ar ts, Un iversity of Pennsy lva n ia , 1978, p. 11. New York : Macm illa n Pu bli sh ing Co ., In c., 1968.
7. Bee by, "T h e Gra mm a r of Orn am ent/Orn am en t as
G r am mar," p p . 11 -1 2 . Chapter 13
8. Carl , Peter. "Towa rds A Plura list Ar ch itectur e ." Progressiv e 1. Dr u c ke r, Pe te r F. Th e Age of D isco nt inuity. New Yor k :
A rch itectu re. Feb. 1973, p . 84 . H a r p e r & Row , 1968. Toffl er, Alv in . Fut u re Shock . New
York : Ra nd om Ho u se, 1970 . Ben n is, Wa r ren G ., a nd Sla ter ,
9. Nor berg-Sch u lz, C. Existence, Space a nd A rchitectu re. N ew
Philip F. T he Temporary Society. Ne w Yo r k: Ha rp e r & Row ,
York: Pra eger Publish ers, In c. , 1971, p . 109.
1968.
10. H anks, Kurt , Be lliston , La rry, and Ed w ards, D ave . D esign
2 . T h es e tw o renova tio n p roj ec ts ad ap ted large old er struc
Yoursel f. Los Altos, CA : Wi lliam Ka ufma nn , Inc ., 1977, p .
tur es fo r use as sh op p ing co m p lexes in th e w aterfr on t are a
112 .
of Sa n Fr a ncis co. T h ey h ave bot h be e n v er y success fu l
socia lly, aes th etically, a nd econ o m ica lly.
Chapter 8
3. Bur n s , J im . Co nnec tions: Ways to D iscove r a nd Re a liz e
1. Row an , "T he Creat ive Peo p le: How to Spo t T hem, " p. 11. Co m mu nity Pot ential s. Stro u ds b ur g , PA: D ow de n, '
Hutch inson & Ross, 1979 . p. 13 .
2 . Rowan, "T he Cr eati ve People : H ow to Sp o t Them ," p . 13.
4. D ow ling, M. I. , Eggin k , H. A ., Lei sh , 8., an d O 'Rio rda n , J.
3. Pye , D avid. Th e N a ture of Design. New Yor k : Re in ho ld
East Cam bridge St udy. Ca m b r id ge , MA: G rad ua te Sch ool of
Publish in g Cor po r at ion, 1964 , pp . 65- 66.
D es ign, H a rvard U n iversity, 1976.
4 . M cKim , Experiences in Visu al Th in k ing, p. 4 7.
5. H a lprin , Lawr en ce . From Process : A rchi tecture No . 4
5. Bro ad be nt , De sign in Architectu re, p. 34 1. La w re nce Halp rin . Ed ite d b y C h in g-Yu C ha n g. Tok yo :
Pr ocess Arch itects P u b lish in g Co m p a ny Ltd ., 1978.
6 . Broad bent, D esign in Archit ecture, p. 34 3.
6 . Bu rn s, Co nn ections : Ways to D iscover and Realize Community
7. Alexa n d e r, C h ri sto p h er, Is h ikawa , Sa ra, an d Silve rste in ,
Poten tials, pp . 2 1- 30 .
Mu rray. A Pal/em Language. New Yor k : Ox fo rd U n ivers ity
Pr ess , 1977, pp . xliii-xliv. 7. T h e Am e r ican In sti tute of A r ch ite cts est a b lish ed t h e
Region a l/U r b an Design Ass ista nc e Tea m Pr ogra m sever a l
yea rs ago as a se rv ice p rovided by th e profes sio n for th e
Chapter 9 p u b lic. In its sh or t h istory, th e p r og ra m h as se rv ed cities
1. Lockard, D esign D rawing. p . 119. th rou g h o u t ou r co u n try w it h a co m b in ed p o p ul a tio n o f
over 10 milli on peopl e.
2 . Pena , Problem See k ing.' An Architect ura l Progra mming
Pri mer, p. 165.
Chapter 14
238 Not es
•
Bibliography •
I. DRAWINGS AND GRAPHICS Klim e nt , Ste phen A. Creative Com m unicat ions for a S uccess ful
D esig n Practice. New Yor k: Wat so n-G up ti ll Publication s,
Atk in, Willia m Wilso n. A rchitectural Presentat ion Techni qu es. In c., 1977 .
New York: Van Nostra nd Reinhold Co., 197 6 . Lockard , William Kir by. D ra wing as a M eans to Architecture.
Beittel, K. M ind and Context in th e A rt of Drawing. New Yo rk : Ne w York: Reinhold, 1968.
Holt, 1972 . Locka rd , Willia m Kir by. D esign D rawing. Rev. Ed. New York:
Bellis, He rbe rt F. A rchitectu ral D ra fting. New York: McGraw Van Nostrand Rein hold , 1982.
Hill Boo k Co ., 1971. Lockar d , Willi am Kirby. Design D rawing Exp erien ces. Tucson ,
Bow ma n, Wi lliam 1. Gra phic Comm unication. New Yor k: Jo hn AZ: Pep pe r Publicati on s, 1974 .
Wiley & Son s, Inc., 1968. Lockw ood , Arthur. D iagra m s. Ne w Yor k: Wa tso nG upt ill
Chi ng, Fran k. A rch itectura l Graphics. New York: John Wiley & Pub lica tions, Inc., 1969.
Sons, Inc., 1975 . McGi n ty, Tim . D raw ing S k ills in Architectur e. D ub uq u e, IA:
Collie r, G . Form , Sp ace, a nd Vision. Englewo od Cliffs , NJ : Ken da ll/Hunt Pu blis hing Co. , 1976 .
Pren tice-Ha ll In c., 1972 . Me ndeIow itz, Dav id M . A Guide to D raw ing. New Yor k: Holt ,
Czaja , Mic hae l. Freehand Drawing, Language of Design. Wal nu t Rein hart a nd Winston , 197 6.
Creek , CA: Ga m bol Press, 1975 . Murgin, Ma thew. Co mm unicatio;z Graphics. New York : Van
DaVinc i, Leo nar do. N otebooks. New York : Dove r Publica tions, Nos tra nd Reinhold Co ., 1969 .
lnc ., 1970 . Nicolaides, K. T he N atu ral Way to D ra w. Boston : Hough to n
De Vries, Ja n Vred e ma n . Perspec tive. New York : Dove r Mifflin , 1941 ; Paperback ed. , 1975.
Pub lications, Inc., 1968 . No r th Ca rolina Un iversity. Sta te Coll ege of Agri c ultu re a nd
Down er, Ric ha rd . Dr awing B uildings. New Yor k: WatsonG up till Enginee ring. Sch ool of Design . Th e Studen t Pub licat ion of
Pub licat ion s, Inc., 1962 . the School of Design. Vol. 14 , Nos. 1- 5, 1964 -1 965 .
Dube ry, Fre d, a nd Willat s, John . Drawing Systems . London: Va n O 'C on nell, William I. Graphic COn/munications in A rchitecture.
. Nostra nd Rein hold Co., 1972 . Cha m paign , IL: Stipes Publishing Co ., 1972 .
Go lds te in, Na tha n . The Art of Respon sive Dra wing. Englewoo d Ped re tt i, Ca r lo . A Chronology of Leonardo Da Vinci 's
Cliffs, NJ: Pre ntice -Hall Inc. , 1973. A rch itectural Stu dies a fter 1500. Ge nev a: E. D roz, 1962 .
Go od ban , Wi lliam I. , a nd Haysle tt , Jack. A rchitectural D rawing Rottger , Ern st , a nd Klan te, Dieter. Creative D raw ing: Point an d
and Planning. Ne w Yor k: Mc G raw -Hill Book Co ., 1972 . Line. New York: Va n Nostrand Reinhold Co., 196 3.
Gup till, Ar th ur Leigh ton . Dra wing with Pen and Ink . New York: Stegman , George K. A rchi tectu ral Drafting Chica go: Amer ican
Reinhold Pub lishing Co. , 1961. Tech nical Society, 1966 .
Ha nks, Kur t, an d Belli ston , Larry. D raw! A Visual A ppr oach to Stein berg, Saul. T he Labyrinth. New York : Ha rp er & Bro the rs,
Thi nk ing, Learn ing, and Comm unica ting. Los Altos, CA: 1960 .
Willia m Ka ufman n , Inc., 1977. T hiel, Phillip . Freehand D rawing, a Primer. Sea ttle : Univers ity
Han ks, Kur t, Bellis ton , Lar ry , an d Edwa rds, Dave. D esign of Washing ton Press, 1965.
Yourself Los Altos, CA: W illiam Ka ufma nn , Inc., 1977. Th urber, James . Th ur ber «nd Com pany. New York: Ha rpe r &
Hayes, Co hn . G ramma r of Dra w ing for A rtist s and D esigners. Row Publishers In c., 1966 .
New York : Van No stra nd Rein hold Co ., 1969 . Walker, Th eodo re D. Plan Graphics. West Lafaye tte, IN: PDA
Hill, Ed ward . The La nguage of Dra wing. New York: Pre ntice Publica tion s, 197 5.
Hall Inc., 1966 . Weid haas, Ernes t R. A rchitectural D ra ftin g an d Construction.
Hogarth , Pau l. Drawing A rch itec ture: A Crea tive Approac h. New Boston: Allyn a nd Baco n , 1974 .
York: Walson -G up till Publicat ions, Inc., 1973. W h ite, Ed w a rd T. Con cept Sou rcebook. Tucson , AZ:
Ja coby, He lmu t. New Archi tectural Dra w ings. New York : Archi tectural Media, 1975 .
Praege r, 1969 .
Jacob y, H elm u t. N ew Tec hniques o f Architectural Ren dering.
New York : Praege r, 197 1. II. DESIGN AND PROBLEM-SOLVING
Kemper, Alfre d. Prese nta tion D rawings by America n A rchitec ts.
New York: John Wiley & Sons , Inc., 1977. Ada ms, Ja mes L. Conceptual Blockbusting. New Yor k : Scribne r,
1974.
239
Alexa nd e r, Christ op h e r. N o tes on the Syn the s is o f Form. III. VISUAL COMMU NICATION AND PERCEPTION
Cam br id ge, M A: Ha rva rd U ni versity Press , 1967.
Alexa nde r, C h ris top he r, Ishi kaw a , Sa ra, a n d Silv e rs te in , Alexa nd er, H. Language and Th inning. New York : Van Nostra nd
M urr ay. A Pat tern Language. New York : O xford U n iversi ty Rei n hold Co. , 1967.
Press, 1977 . Arn h e im , Ru d olf . Visu al Thi nk ing. Be r ke ley : Un ivers ity of
Alger, j. , and H ay s, C. Creative Syn thesis in Des ign. En glewood Ca liforn ia Press, 1969 .
Cliffs , NJ : Pr e n tice -H all In c., 1964. Ba ch , M. Power of Perception . Ga rde n C ity, N Y: Dou bl ed ay,
Ar c her, L. Br u ce. Th e Struct ure of De sign Processes. Lo n d o n : 1966 .
Royal College of Arl, 1968. Bar tlett , F. C . Remembe ring. New York : Ca m b rid ge Un ivers ity
Ben d er , To m G . Environ m ent al Design Primer. New Yor k: P ress, 1977.
Sch oken , 1976. Bar tley, S. Principles of Perception. Ne w York : Ha rp er, 1972 .
Best, Go rdon . "Me thod a nd In tenti on in Ar ch itect u ra l Design. " Bloc k , H ., a n d Sa li nge r, H . The Creati ve Vision. G lou ces ter,
D esign M et hods in A rchitecture. Ed ite d by Broadbe n t a nd M A: Peter Smith , 1968.
Wa rd . Ne w York: Georg e Wittenborn In c., 1969.
Bo is, J . The Art of Aware ness. D u b u q ue , 1A: W C . Bro wn , 197 3.
Broadbent, Geo ff rey. Design in A rch itectu re. New Yor k: John
Wi ley & Sons , In c., 1973. Br y, Ade la id e , a nd Bair, Marjo rie. D irecti ng M ovies of Your
M ind: Visuali zat ion for Health a nd I nsights. New York :
Bro ad b ent, G eo ffr ey , a n d Ward , An tho ny , e d s . I. Design Ha rp er a nd Row , 19 78 .
Me thods in A rchitecture Symposium . Ne w Yor k : G .
Wit te nb orn , 1969. Ch omsky, Noa m . La nguage an d M ind. N ew Yor k : Ha rco ur t
Bra ce Jova no vich , 1972 .
Bu rn s, Jim . Connec tions: Ways to D iscover a nd Reali ze
Comm unity Potentials. St ro u d sbu rg , PA . Do w d en , Ch om s ky, Noarn . "Rev iew o f B. F. Skin n er Verbal Be h av ior. "
Hu tchinson & Ross , In c., 1979 . Language Magaz ine, Jan - Ma r 1959 .
Duffy, Fra n c is, and Torrey, J oh n . "A Pr ogre ss Rep o r t on the Cu n n ingha m , S., a nd Rea ga n , C . Handbook of Visual Perceptual
Pa ttern La nguage." In M oor e, Gary T , Emerging Metho ds in Train ing. Sp rin gfield , IL: Tho m as, 1972 .
Environmental Design and Planning. Cam br id ge, M A: M IT Fe ld m an , Ed m u n d Bu rk e. Art A s Image and Idea. Englew ood
Press, 1970 . Cliffs, NJ : Pr en tice-Ha ll In c., 1967.
Environmental D esign: Resea rch and Pra ctice. En vir o nm e n tal Gibso n , j. Th e Senses Considered as Perceptu al Systems. Boston :
Desi gn Res ea rc h Co n ferenc e. Los An gel es : Un ive rsity of Ho ug h ton -M iffl in , 1966 .
Ca liforn ia , 1972
Gi bson , Ja m es. The Perception of the Visual World. Bos to n .
Ga rr e tt, L. Visu al Design, A Pro blem Sol ving A pproach . Ne w Hou gh ton-M iffl in , 1950 .
Yor k: Re in h old , 1967.
Ha rla n , C. Vision and Invention. En glewood Cliffs, NJ: Pre n tice
Ha lp rin, Bu rn s. Taking Part . Ca m bridg e: M IT Pr ess, 1974 . Hall In c., 1970.
Ha lp rin, Law ren ce . RSVP Cycles. New Yor k: G eorge Brazille r H a yak awa , S. La nguage in Th ought and A ction . New York:
Inc. , 1969 . Har cour t Brace Jova novic h , 1978 .
Hc imsa th , Cloris. Behav ioral Archi tecture. New Yor k: M cG ra w H u xley, A. The A rt of Seeing. Sea ttle, WA: M ad ron a P u b lish ers,
Hill Book Co., 1977. 1975 .
Jon e s, J oh n Christoph er. D esign M eth ods. New York : Jo h n Jan son , H . W. Th e Na ture of Representation: A Phenomenological
Wi ley & Son s, In c., 1920 . Enqu iry. New Yor k : N cw Yor k Un iversity Pr ess, 196 1.
Jo nes, O w en . The Gram ma r of Orna ment. Lon d on: B. Q ua ritc h , j can ne r e t-G ris, C ha rles Edou ard . N ew Worl d of Space. New
19 10. Yor k : Rey n a l an d H itch co ck , 1948.
Kob e rg, Do n, a n d Bagn a ll , J im . The Universa l Traveler. Los Kepes, G yorgy. Language of Vision. C h icago , IL: Pau l T he ob old
Altos, CA : Willi a m Kau fm ann , Inc ., 1972 . a nd Co ., 1944 .
Ma n heim , M a rvin L. Problem Solving Processes in Plan ning and Lu c ki esh , Ma tt hew. Visual Ill usions, Th eir Causes,
Design. Ca m brid ge, MA : Sch ool of En gin ee r in g. MIT, 1967 . Characteristics and A pplicati ons. New Yor k : Dover, 1965.
M oore , Cha rl es Will a rd , Lyndon , Oon lyn, a nd Allen , Gera ld ., M cKim , Ro b er t H . Experiences in Visual Think ing. Mo n terey,
The Place of Ho uses. Be r kel ey, CA : U n ive rs ity of Ca lifo rn ia CA: Br ookes/Cole , 1972 .
Pr ess, 2000.
The N otebook of Paul Klee. Vol. 1 Th e Thi nk ing Eye. New Yor k:
M oor e, Ga ry T Em erging M ethods in Environmen tal Des ign and W itt en b orn , 1978 .
Planning. Ca m b rid ge , M A: De s ign Me t ho d s Gro up . M IT
Pa ra m e n te r, Ross . The Awa hened Eye. M id d le tow n , CT
Press, 1968 .
Wesleya n Un ive rsity Press, 1968.
M u mford , Lew is . The Ci ty m Hi story. N ew Yor k : H ar court,
Pitch e r, G . A Theory of Perceptio ns. Pr in ceton , NJ : Prin ce ton
Brace & Worl d , In c., 196 1.
Un iver sity, 197 1
Ne lson , G e orge . Probl ems of D esign. Ne w Yor k : W hit n ey
Rob e rt so n , T In novative Beha vior an d Com m uni cat ion . New
Pu b lishe rs, 1957 .
York : Holt, 1971
Pena , Wi llia m M ., with Caudi ll, W illia m W , an d Focke, Joh n
Sam uels , M ., an d Sam u els, N . Seei ng wi th the Mi nd 's Eye. N ew
W Problem Seek ing. H ous ton : Ca ud ill Row lett Scott, 1969.
Yor k: Ra n d om H ou se. 1975 .
240 Bi bliography
Summer, Robe rt. The Mi nd's Eye. New York: Dell Pu bli shing, Ga rf ield, Patricia . Crea tive D rea m ing . Ne w York : Ball ant in e
1978. Book s, 1974.
Vygotsky, Lev S. Thou ght and Languag e. Cambridge, MA: MIT Gombrich , F. H. A rt an d Illu sion. N ew Yo rk:
Press, 1962. Ph ardon/Pantheon , 1960 .
Walk er, Theod ore D . Perceptio n and En vironmenta l Design. West Gordon, W. J. J. Sy nectics: The Dev elopment of Creat ive Capa city.
Lafayette, IN : PDA Publish e rs, 1971. New Yor k: Macmillan , 1968.
Whi teh ead , Alfred North . Sy m bolism , Its Mea ning and Effe ct. G reen e, Herb. Mind and Im age. Lexing to n , KY: Un iversity
New York: Ma cm illan Co. , 1959. Press of Kentucky, 197 6.
Gruber , Ho wa rd E., ed. Co nte m pora ry A pproaches to Creative
Think ing. New York: Ath erton Press, 1963.
IV. CREATIVITY Koes tle r, Ar th ur. Th e A ct of Creat ion: A Study of Conscious and
Uncon scious in Scie nce and Art. New York: Dell Pub lish ing,
Ban ker, W. Brain Storms, New York: Grove, 196 8. 1973
Ba rre tt , W. Tim e of N eed: For ms of Im agina tion in the 2 0th Korner, S. Concept ual Thin ki ng: A Logical Inqu iry. New Yor k:
Century. New York: Harper, 1972. Dover, 1959 .
Batte n , M. Discovery By Chance. New York: Funk a nd Wagnalls Krippner, S., a nd Hu ghe s, W. Dre ams and H um an Poten tial.
Co ., 196 8. Pap er presented to American Asso ciat ion of Humanisti c
Berrill , N. J. M an 's Emerging M ind: Th e S tory of Man 's Progress Psychology, 1969.
Through Time. New York: Faw cett World Lib rary, 1965. Maslow, A. H. Th e Far ther Reaches of H uman Na ture. New Yor k:
Boas, G. H istory of Id eas. New York : Scri bners, 1969. Th e Viking Press, 1973.
Bourne , L. H uman Conceptu al Behav ior. Boston : All yn and McKellar, Peter. Im aginati on and Th ink ing: A Psychological
Bacon , 1966 . A nalysis. Norwood, PA. Nor wood Ed ition s, 1978 .
Brown , R. The Creative Spirit. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat, Osb orn, A. F. Applied Im agination: Principles and Practices of
1970. Creat ive Thinking. New York : Scri bners, 1957
Br u ne r, J ., Good now, 1., and Austin , G. A S tudy of T hink ing. Pikas, A. A bst ract ion and Concept' Forma tion . Ca mbridge , MA:
New York: Wiley, 1956. Harvard University, 196 6.
Burton , W, Kim ball, R., a nd W ing, R. Edu cat ion for Effective Pollock , T. Managing Creat ively. Boston : Cahn er s Book s, 1971 .
Think ing. New York: Apple ton , 1960. Prince, George M. The Pra ctice of Crea tivity. New York: Harper
Cha ng, C. Y. Creativity and Taoism . Ne w York: Ha rper, 1970. & Row (paperbac k, Collier Boo ks, 1972 ).
Cobb, S. D iscovering the Genius W ithin You. Metuch e n , NJ: Reed , F. D eveloping Creative Talen t. New York: Vantage, 1962.
Sca recrow, 1967. Rieser , Dolf . Art a nd Science. N ew Yor k: Van Nos trand
.DeBono, E. La teral Th ink ing. New York: Harper, 1972 . Reinhold , 1972 .
DeBono, E. New Think . New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1968. Row an, H elen. "Th e Creative Peopl e: Ho w to Spot Them. "
THINK. New Yor k: IBM Cor p . Nov.-Dec., 196 2, pp . 7-1 5 .
Dye r, E , a nd Dyer, J. Bu reau cracy vs. Creati vity. Co ral Ga bles,
FL: Un ive rsity of Miami , 1965 Sam p les, Robe rt. I ntrodu ction to the Metaphoric Mi nd. Reading,
MA: Addi son-Wesley Publishing Co., 197 6.
Ebe rl e, R. Scamper' Ga mes for I ma ginativ e D evel op m ent.
Buffalo: D.O.K., 1972 . Wat son, James D. Th e D oubl e Helix. Pasadena, CA: Athe ne um
Press, 1969.
B ibliography 24 1
Illustration Credits
1-1, 8-29: By p erm ission of Biblioteca Am br osian a , Mi la n o . 3-26 : Rep rint ed fro m Freehand D rawing: Language of Design, by
Fro m th e Codex A tlan tiClls, figures 37 a nd 86 in Leona rdo Mic hael Czaja. Walnu t Cree k, CA: Gam bol Pr ess, 1975.
Da Vinci: Th e Royal Palace a t R omara ntin by Ca rl o Pad rett i. 3-27, 5-14 : Courtesy of M ichael F. Gebh a r t , T he Arch itects
Cam bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972 . Colla bor ati ve.
1-2 , 1-3: Rep ro duc ed from the Ca talogue of the D rawings 3-28: Reprod uced by pe rm ission of Bret Dodd .
Collection of the Royal Inst itute of Br itish A rchitects, volume 9,
Edw in Lut yen s, pu bli sh ed by Gregg In ternatio nal, an imprint 5-5, 7-5, 8-30 : Rep r in ted from atelie r rue d e Sev res 35, by
of Avebury Publishing Com pa ny, England, 1973. Gu ille rm o Jullian de la Fue n te a nd An th ony Ea rd ley, a cat a
logu e from a n exhibition of p roject s ketc he s a nd no tes from
1-4 ,7-3, 7-33 , 11-1: Repr odu ced fro m A lvar Aa lto : Sy nopsis, LeCorbu sier to G uille rmo Jullian de la Fuente p ublished by the
ed ited by Be rn ha rd Hoesli , p ublished by Bir kh a use r Verl ag, Co lleg e of Architecture in colla bora tion with th e U niversity
Basel, 1970 . Art Galler y, Uni ver sit y of Ken tucky, Lexington.
1-5, 5- 11, 5-15: Co ur te sy of T homas N . Lar son , FAAR, Th e 7-6: Fr om Rich a rd Sa u l Wur m an a n d Euge n e Feldman . The
Arc hitec ts Collaborative . N otebc ok s and Drawings of Louis I. Kahn. Ca m bridge, MA : MIT
1-6, 7-34 , 11-10: Court esy of Th om as H . Bee by, Hamm ond , Press, 1962.
Beeby, Babka , Arc hitects, Chicago. 5-1' By cour tesy of Archi tectur al Pub lishers Art e m is, Zur ich .
1-7, 2-6, 5-4: Fro m Atkin , Will iam W. A rchitect ural Presenta tion Published in Louis I. Kahn . Copyright 1975 .
Techn iqu es. e 1976 by Litt o n Ed ucational Publis hin g, Inc . 5-3, 5-9: Cour tesy of Edw in F. Harris, Jr., ' 59. From Th e St uden t
Rep rinted by pe rm ission of Van Nos tra nd Reinhold Com pany. Publica tion of the School of D esign, vol. 10, n um ber 2 , North
1-8: Fr om Er ma n , Adolph . Life in Ancient Egyp t. N ew York : Car olina Sta te University, Raleigh , NC .
reprint ed by Benjam in Blom , In c., 1969. Distributed by Arno 5-6: From Papadaki , Sta mo . The Worh of Oscar Nie meyer. New '
Press, Inc. York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1950 .
1-17: From Cybernetic Serendipity: Th e Com puter and the A rts. 5-7, 5-19: Cour tes y of Ja mes W. Anderson and Lan dplus West ,
New York: Praeger Publishe rs, Inc., 1968 . lnc., Lan d Pla nne rs/Landscape Arc hitects.
1-24, 5-2, 11-2 : Co ur tesy of Da vid T. Stieglitz, Stieglitz Stieglitz 5-8: Reprinted with th e permi ssion of Law re nce Halprin . From
Tries, Architects, Buf falo , NY. The RS VP Cycles: Creative Processes in the Human Envi ron ment .
1-27: Rep r in ted fr om th e Jul y 1978 issu e of Progr essive New York: George Braziller, Inc ., 1969.
A rchitecture, copy righ t 1978, Rein hold Publishing Compa ny. 5-10, 5-12,7-7: Courtesy of Gera ld Exline. From Williams, A.
2-2, 5-20, 5-22, 5-23 , 7-29: Rep rod uced by perm ission of Lisa Richa rd . T he Urban Stage (Stu d y Dra ft ). Champagne-Urb an a,
Kolber. IL, 11:1976 .
2-3, 7-18: Reprin ted w ith the perm ission of Pr oces s Arc hitects 5-13: Reprin ted wi th th e p erm ission of Pro cess Ar chit ec ts
Pub lish ing Com pa ny Ltd ., Tokyo , and Law r en ce Ha lpr in. Publishing Co m pa ny Ltd ., Tok yo, a nd Roma ld o Giurgola ,
Copyr ight 1978. From Process: A rchit ect ur e N o. 4 Lawre nce Copy righ t 1977 . Fro m Process: Arch itectu re No. 2 Mitchell
Halprin. Giurgola Architects.
2-4: Rep rod uce d by perm issio n of Ka rl Brown . 5-17: Drawing by a rch ite ct Hu gh Stu b bins , from his book
2-5: Reprinte d w ith th e perm ission of Des ign Pub lica tion s, In c. Archit ecture: The D esign Experience. New Yor k: John Wil ey a nd
From the Ma rc h 1975 issue of Indu strial Design M agaz ine. Son s, 1976.
2-7, 5-2 1, 5-26, 5-27: Repr odu ced by pe rmi ssion of Patrick P. 5-25: Reproduced by per m ission of Thom as A. Ch eesm an .
Na Il. 5-24 Reprodu ce d by pe rm ission of Jam es A. Walls.
2-38: Rep rod uced by permission of Todd Ca rlson . 7-11, 7-12: Fr om "T he G ram ma r of Orn a m ent /Orn am e n t as
3- 1: Rende ring of the Studen t Un ion Hou sing, University of Gra m m a r " by T ho m as H . Beeb y, publi sh ed in VI A II I, The
Albe rta a t Ed m on ton , Ar c hitects: A. J . Dia m ond a nd Barton jo urn al of th e G rad ua te Schoo l of Fine Arts, Un ive rsity of
Myer s in as soc iation with R. 1. Wilkin , Arc hitect, a nd Bart on Pen n sy lvan ia . Re p rin ted w ith th e p ermission of Th om as H.
Myers, Pa rtn er-in-Cha rge. Rende ring by A. J. Diamo nd . Beeby.
3-2 1: Cour tesy of T homa s P. Tr uax . From a resear c h s tu d y, 7-28: Reprin ted fr om N orbe rg-Schulz . C . Ex is tence, Spa ce &
O hio Univers ity Schoo l of Arc hitectur e a nd Planning, 1974 . Architecture. New Yor k: Praeger Publishe rs, In c., 197 1.
3-24, 3-25: Reprint ed fr om H el m u t Ja coby Architectural 7-32: Cour tesy of Th omas P. Tru ax. From m aster 's thesis proj
D raw ings. New Yor k: Pr aeger Publis hers, Inc., 1965. ec t, O hio Un ive rsity, 1975.
242
8-14 : Co ur tesy of Mar k S. Sowa ts ky. Fro m Atla n tis 2, the s is 13-1 4 , 13-15: Rep r inted by th e pe rm iss io n of W. P_ D ur ke e,
proj ect , Co llege of Arch itec tur e a nd Pla n n ing , Ball Sta te U rba n Design As socia tes, Pittsb urg h , a nd Roy Ma n n , Roy
Uni ver sity, In d ian a , 1977. Man n Asso ci a tes , Ca mb rid ge, MA , from Portsmou th Study.
10- 12, 10- 13 , 10-14, 10-1 7 : Re pr od uced by pe rm issio n of Ame ri ca n In s ti tute of Arch itec ts, Regio na l/ U rba n Des ign
Raymond Ga et a n. Assistance Tea m.
10·15 , 10-16 : Rep roduced by permi ssio n of T im Treman . 13-16: Repr in ted wi th th e pe rm ission of C ha rle s A. Blessi ng,
FAIA , fr o m Phoenix Study. Ame rican In s titute o f Ar c h ite c ts,
12-3, 12-4 : Reprin ted w ith the perm issio n of W illiam W. Regional/Urban Design Assistan ce Tea m .
Ca ud ill, FAIA, Ca ud ill Row le tt Sco tt , fro m hi s boo k
A rch itecture by Team . Ne w York: Van Nos tra n d Rei nh old 13-17, 13-18: Draw n by H ar ry Eggin k. Pre lim ina ry ske tch es for
Compa ny, 197 1. Baske tba ll Hall of Fame a t New Castle, IN.
13-5, 13-6 : D ra w n by Harry A. Egg ink. From the East 13-19: Draw n by Ha rry Eggink . Roga n Hou se, Elkhar t, IN.
Cam bridge Study, by M icha el Ju sti n Dow ling, Ha rry A. Eggink, 13-20 : Drawn by Ha r ry Eggink . Ea st Ba n k Dev e lop me nt for
Br uce Leish , and Joan O ' Riord an , Urba n Design Prog ra m , Elkh a rt, IN .
Grad uate Sch ool of Design, Ha rva rd U nive rsity, 1976 . 13-21 , 13-22, 13-23: Reprin ted w it h th e pe rm iss ion of Harr y
13-7,1 3-8,1 3-9, 13-10,1 3- 11. Reprin ted w ith the permission of Eggin k fro m Aleph Park , a co m p ute r-based, high -tech , indu s
the p u blishers and Steve Levi ne fro m Connections: Way s to trial si te pla n ni ng ca se stud y (Ha rry A. Eggink a nd Robe rt J.
D iscover and Rea lize Com m unity Potential by Jim Burns. Koes te r, p roject di rec to rs ; Mi chel e Mou nayar, p rin cipa l con
Co py r ight 19 79 by Do w den , Hu tchin so n & Ross, In c., s u lta n t]. M u nc ie , IN : Ba ll Sta te U n iver si ty, Co llege of
Publish er, Str ou dsburg, PA. Arc hitec tu re a nd Pla n n ing a n d Ce n te r for Ene rgy
13-13: Repri nt ed w ith th e pe rm ission of Pet er Ha sse lm a n, AlA, Resea rch/Ed ucati o n/Se rvice, 1984 .
from th e Atla ntic City Stud y. Ame rican Ins titute of Archi tect s, 14- 1, 14-2, 14-3, 14-4: Rep rod uced by pe rmi ssio n of Na tha n
Regiona l/Urban Design Assista nce Tea m . Moo re.
13-12: Rep r in ted with the pe rm ission of Joh n De smond , FAIA, 14-5: By David Th om pson Design . Reproduc ed by perm ission
fro m Phoenix Study. Ameri ca n In s titute of Ar c hitects, of Hou se + Ho use Arc hitect s.
Regio nal/Urba n Des ign Assis ta nce Team . 14-6: Co m puter ren d e rin g by Shaw n Brown . Rep roduced by
pe rm iss io n of House + H ou se Arch itects.
Aalto, Alva r, 3, 15 1
Abstraction :
Da Vin ci, Leonardo ,
ap plied, 86
Des ign :
Activity pa tte rn s, 96
as life tim e process, 198
Aestheti c orde r, 77
objectives, 80
D iscove ry, 14 1
Balance, 103
Di scr im ina tion , 34
Beh av ior, 78
Dis tilla tio n , 70
Building program , 87
Doodles, 36
Dr awing, 17
Cartoons, 34
Drawi ng ev alua tion, 170
Cha rac te r, 73
Climate, 95
Effec tive Com m u nicatio n , 11
Comparison, 82
Env ironment for think ing/desig ning, 190
Co mp rehensive views, 40
Eq u ipme nt, 190
Concrete :
Eva lua tio n crite ria , 168
im ages, 40 , 171
Exp erien ce reversa l, 124
244
O rnamen ta l gra mmar, 120-123
G rap hic:
gra m ma r, ~ 6 - 5 8
Para llel projections, 46
lan gu age : 56
Patte rn la ngua ge, 156-157
G ra phic Th inking:
Persona l a na logy, 144-145
op tion s, 184
Phys ica l site ana lys is, 98
tra d ition , 1
Plan ske tches, 48
Progra m , b uilding, 76
Ideagra m , 149
Pro porti on, 102
Ide ntities , 59
Pro to types, 150-153
Ide nt ity, 67
Pu blic de sign , 2 17
Im agin ati on , 35
Py ra m id of possi bilities, 134
In viti ng co m munication, 2 19
Ran d om thoughts, 148
Linew ork , 24
Refres hme n t, 70
Ma ss, 103
Repres e nta tion:
Matrix, 154
e le me n ta ry fo rms, 40
Mood ,73
Reversals, 124-127
Ne ed,88
Rhy thm , 104
Ne tw or k diagra m s, 20 8-209
Note books, 1
Sca le, 102
O bserva tion , 20
Sen se aw ar e ness , 148
Index 245
Sketch:
Ton es, 25
building a , 22
Tracing, 28
details, 26
Tra nsform ation , 118
structu re , 24
program to sch emat ic desi gn , 82-83
tech nique, 50
tones, 25
U ni ty, 105
Style, 68
Vision , 5-6
Synectics, 148
com mu nication , 4
percep tion, 13
Team :
th inki ng, 6
design , 203
Visual -me nta l ga m es , 36
Thinking:
abstract , 192-193
Wright, Fran k Lloyd, 118, 150, 199
public , 194-195
24 6 Index