Case 4.2 Party Time, Inc: Keshav Kumar 1006 Naarm
Case 4.2 Party Time, Inc: Keshav Kumar 1006 Naarm
Case 4.2 Party Time, Inc: Keshav Kumar 1006 Naarm
2
Party Time,
03/29/11
Inc
Keshav Kumar
1006 1
NAARM
Flow of discussion:-
üAbout Company
03/29/11
üThe Distribution Decision
üCompetitive Issue
üQuestions & Answers
•
•
2
About Company:-
• Manufactures variety of special paper product.
• Grouped into three broad categories:-
I.Gift Wrap
03/29/11
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.Party Goods ( printed plates, cups)
VII.
VIII.
IX.
3
X.
XI.
Sales & its percentage:-
03/29/11
4
Profit & its Percentage:-
03/29/11
5
03/29/11
6
The Distribution Decision:
ØPresently distributed only through Mass
Merchandiser and Chain Drugstores.
03/29/11
ØAndrew Todd, CEO thinks, is this right time to
add IPG(Independent Party Good) shop.
than 25%(projection).
• 7
Competitive issue:-
• Competition within traditional
channels of distribution is intense.
03/29/11
• Less within IPG channels.
•
vHad meeting & decided to have
information on following areas:-
üCompetitive Products.
üPurchase Criteria.
üSupplier Loyalty.
8
•
• Marketing Research team developed:
-
ØUndisguised Telephone Questionnaire.
03/29/11
ØSemi-structured
03/29/11
Total shops reached 82(74%)
03/29/11
owners. How would you have
recommended the research team
develop the sampling frame?
• This sampling frame has Non-
observation errors (Non-sampling
errors).
ØNon- coverage errors
ØNon-response errors 11
üNot at home
• Recommendation:-
üImprove sampling frame
03/29/11
üEmploy a sampling specialist to
reduce imperfection.
üRandom digit or plus-one dialing.
üFollow-up
üIncrease initial response rate
ü
12
Ques 2:-
vDo you think that a telephone survey
was the best way to collect the
03/29/11
needed information?
• In my view its not the best way to
collect the needed information in this
particular case, because
üTelephone directory does not
provide a complete sampling
frame.
üUn-listed number problem 13