;-,,'

IRC:44-2008

GUIDELINES

FOR

CEMENT CONCRETE MIX DESIGN

FOR PAVEMENTS

(SECOND REVISION) ,

~'~l:c>
,,(;·C "~~
/~:))"/ -.. (·J/t.- ,\
,fl. / /~ \ c/\
I. '
~,I i"" 1 ve.
... ~ -r-- \.
) -..::..
\ I "I \ • i I>;. ~~~-' ;
\(:<~cJ/
, "/
'~_.//

INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS

2008

""--"'" .
 IRC:44-2008
xOO.!.. ·, ..., I

GUIDELINES
FOR .. ...... \ .... . ..":i-.• .; ~

CEMENT CONCRETE MIX,DE.s~IGN t, :;' ,,' ' ""

,': . :".. ..
FOR PAVEMENTS""'" ..'. ";,,, , \/" ~. ,'..1 b~,
)

• 'i "~I' ,

(SECOND REVISION));; , ., -,:,;, .~ : ,l I

.\;'j }\~t. >, "\ 't.\"'",. ,~"\'J'j~•

';j.\\'. "
'r,\ ,\. "-.• r '. .: • \ '\.~.j' ~ . t ".~. ".' \ .

',\ ,,'. \' ,',

Published by
INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS
KamaKoti Marg,

Sector6, R.K. Puram,

New Delhi-lID 022

2008
, , ,." <. ; .,~ I , , ; . J.tl ' ,
.. 'j' ,~
I: ~;'\'\J · ... f ,, ' ... .'.'.~ t'
t,. 1 ~"" \;~;:i
.. ,. :1":";,-,,.
.. ~,;.:
.' ~ '. Il ""1,1,1,,.' :" " Rs. 1601­ : Pn~e

, , ~. "i" :,'" (Packingand Postage charges extra)

.... ....

IRC:44-2008 ;1
:;,i:
;~~

~t
First Published August, 1972
,'~_:
First-Revision December, 1976
Second Revision September, 2008 I'~'
'::.'

Reprinted June,2009 -:~

Reprinted March,2010 .~

.~;

\.,

'f~~

I
I

1
~
~
);
'i.
:J
~

(All Rights Reserved. No Part of this Publication shall be reproduced,

translated or transmitted in any form or by any means without the
permission of the Indian Roads Congress)

Printed at Abhinav Prints, K-37, Udyog Nagar Indl, Area, Delhi - 110041
(500 copies)

 IRC:44-2008

CONTENTS
Page No.
(i)
Personnel ofthe Highways Specifications andStandardsCommittee
1
1. Introduction
3
2. Scope
4
3. Relevant Definitions
4
4. Materials
7
5. Data forMixProportioning
8
6. DesignStrength
9
7. SelectionofMix Proportions
12
8. Trial Mixes
13
9. Procedure forMix Proportioning

15
Annexure-A : DefinitionsofCommonlyusedTenns
16
Annexure-B : Typical Examples ofDesignStrengths ofConcrete
forDifferent Degreesof Quality Conrol
17
Annexure-C : illustrative ExampleoilConcrete
MixProportioning
23
Annexure-D : Illustrative Example on Concrete
MixProportioning

..

t ad iii emits 7 trw: TF" ", . ppm 17Ft trm

 IRC:44-2008

PERSONNEL OF THE HIGHWAYS SPECIFICATIONS AND

STANDARDS COMMITTEE

(As on 28th March, 2008)

1. Sinha, VK. Addl. Director General, Ministry of Shipping Road Transport &
(Convenor) Highways/Secretary General, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi
2. Singh, Ninnaljit Member (Tech.), National Highways Authority ofIndia, New Delhi
(Co-Convenor)
3. Sharma,ArunKumar Chief Engineer (R) S&R, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport &
(Member-Secretary) Highways, New Delhi

Members

4. Ahluwalia, H.S. ChiefEngineer, Ministry ofShipping, Road Transport & Highways,

New Delhi
5. Bahadur, A.P. ChiefEngineer, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways,
New Delhi
6. Basu, S.B. ChiefEngineer, Ministry ofShipping, Road Transport & Highways,
New Delhi
7. Chandrasekhar, B.P., Dr. Director (Tech.), National Rural Roads DevelopmentAgency (Ministry
of.Rural Development), New Delhi
8. Datta, P.K. Executive Director, Consulting Engg. Services (1) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
9. Desai, J.P. Sr. Vice-President (Tech Ser.), GujaratAmbuja Cement Ltd.,
Ahmedabad
10. Deshpande, D.B. Vice-President, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation,
Mumbai
11. Dhingra, S.L., Dr. Professor, Indian Institute ofTechnology, Mumbai
12. Gupta, D.P. DG (RD) (Retd.), Ministry ofShipping, Road Transport & Highways,
New Delhi
13. Gupta, K.K. ChiefEngineer (Retd.), Haryana, PWD
14. Jain, N.S. ChiefEngineer, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways,
New Delhi
15. Jain, R.K. Chief Engineer (Retd.), Haryana PWD, Sonepat
16. Jain, S.S., Dr. Professor & Coordinator, Centre ofTransportation Engg., ITT Roorkee
17. Kadiyali, L.R., Dr. ChiefExecutive, L.R. Kadiyali & Associates, New Delhi
18. Kandasamy, C. ChiefEngineer, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways,
New Delhi
19. Krishna, Prabhat Chief Engineer (Retd.), Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport &
Highways, New Delhi
20. Kukreti, B.P.
Chief General Manager, National Highways Authority of India,
New Delhi
2 l. Kumar, Anil
ChiefEngineer (Retd.), CDO, Road Constn. Deptt., Ranchi

(i)

mT
-" -Ii 1;
 IRC:44-2008

22. Kumar, Kamlesh Chief Engineer, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways,

New Delhi ~~'

:~~

23 . Liansanga Engineer-in-Chief & Secretary, PWD, Mizoram, Aizwal .~

24. Mina, H.L. Secretary to the Govt. of Raj asthan, PWD, Jaipur ""
25. Momin, S.S. Former Member, Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Mumbai f ~­
.~
26. Nanda, P.K. Director (Retd.), Central Road Research Institute New Delhi ·~t
~::

27. Rathore, S.S. Secretary to the Govt. of Gujarat, PWD, Gandhinagar

28. Reddy, T.S., Dr. Senior Vice-President, NMSEZ Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd.

~
~\'1

Mumbai
~:
29. Sachdev, VK. Chief Engineer (Retd.), Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & ~:

30. Sastry, G VN.

Highways, New Delhi
Engineer-in-Chief(R&B), Andhra Pradesh PWD, Secunderabad ~:·I · i.
-;' ,_I

tel
31. Sharma, S.C. DG(RD) &AS, MORT&H (Retd.), New Delhi
32. Sharma, VM. Dr. Director, AIMIL, New Delhi
33. Shukla,R.S. Ex-Scientist, Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi
34. Sinha,A.V Member (Tech.), National Highways Authority ofIndia,
New Delhi
35. Srivastava, H.K. Director (Projects), National Rural Roads Development Agency,

36. Velayudhan, T.P.

(Ministry ofRural Development), New Delhi
Addl, DGBR, Directorate General Border Roads, New Delhi
i~,
Ex-Officio Members

1. President, IRC (Mina, H.L.), Secretary to the Govt. of Rajasthan, PWD, Jaipur

2. Director General (Sharan. G.), Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways,

(Road Development) New Delhi

3. Secretary General (Sinha, VK.), Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi

Corresponding Members

1. Borge, VB. Past-President, IRC, Secretary (Retd.), Maharashtra PWD, Mumbai

2. Justo, C.E.G, Dr. Emeritus Fellow, Bangalore University

3. Khattar, M.D. Executive Director, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., Mumbai

4. Merani, N.V Principal Secretary,Maharashtra PWD (Retd.), Mumbai

·1
(ii)

fttrz . .0"
 fRC:44-2008

GUIDELINES FOR CEMENT CONCRETE MIX

DESIGN FOR PAVEMENTS

(SECOND REVISION)

1. INTRODUCTION

Concrete has become an indispensable construction material. According to the present

state-of-the-art, concrete has bypassed the stage ofmere four component system, that is, cement,
water, coarse aggregates and fine aggregates. It can be a combination of far more number of
ingredients, for example a judicious combination of ingredients from as many as ten materials. In
the recent past, apart from the four ingredients mentioned above, and some more ingredients
namely fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, silica fume, rice husk ash, metakaoline,
superplasticizer and fibres are generally used in concrete as the situation demands. Hence, it is all
the more, plasticizers and retarders, accelerators and air entraining agents essential at this juncture
to have general guidelines on proportioning the ingredients in concrete mixes. The need for the
guidelines has been further enhanced by the importance given to proportionedconcrete mixes in
different specifications including IS:456.
The objective of proportioning concrete mixes is to arrive at the most economical and
practical combinations and proportions of different ingredients to produce concrete that will meet
the performance requirements under specified conditions of use. An integral part of concrete mix
proportioning is the preparation oftrial mixes and effecting adjustments to such trials to strike a
balance between the requirements of placement, that is, workability and strength, concomitantly
satisfying durability requirements.
Concrete has to be of satisfactory quality both in its fresh and hardened states. This task is
best accomplished by trial mixes arrived at by the use of certain established relationships among
different parameters and by analysis of data already generated thereby developing a basis for
judicious combination of all the ingredients involved. The basic principles which underline the
proportioning of mixes are Abram's law for strength development and Lyse's rule for making mix
with adequate workability for placement in a dense state so as to enable the strengthdevelopment
as contemplated. From practical point ofview, compressive strength is often taken as an index of
acceptability. This does not necessarily satisfy the requirements of durability unless examined
under specific context. Mix proportioning is generally carried out for a particular compressive
strength or flexural strength requirements ensuring that fresh concrete ofthe mix so proportioned
possesses adequate workability for placement without segregation and bleeding while attaining a
dense state.
Proportioning of concrete mixes can be regarded as a procedureset to proportion the
most economical concrete mix for specified durability and grade for required site conditions. The
basic principle of the concrete mix design is to select the proportion of all the- ingredients on the
basis of their absolute volume and taking total absolute volume of concrete 1 m'. In the present
Guidelines, the absolute volume of air has been considered as nil as against 2 per cent for 20 mm
and 1 per cent for 40 mm maximum size ofaggregate as provided in 1st Revision ofIRC:44-1976.

$n\a ,~,

-- ._._._.~-_.
---~ - -, won' ~'r& ···""'wtt'Pw.r4I
 IRC:44-2008

As a guarantor of quality of concrete in the construction, the constructor should carry out .:~
-.'.;.-':':"
~;'
mix proportioning and the Engineer-in-Charge should approve the mix so proportioned. The "?: ~,

method given in these Guidelines is to be regarded as guidelines only, to arrive at an acceptable :.; (

~ ~
product which satisfies the requirements of placement required with development of strength with ·······1
age and ensures the requirements of durability. cw.·
.:{~~
-:\~-'
IRC:44-1976 "Tentative Guidelines for Cement Concrete Mix Design for Pavement" was
prepared by Cement Road Surfacing Committee. This was then processed and approved by the I

Specifications and Standards Committee in their meeting held on the 18th and 19 th November,
1971. This document was finally approved by the Executive Committee in their meeting held on
26 th and 27 th April, 1972 and by the Council in their 78 th meeting held at Nainital on l O" July,
1972. The Guidelines were later amended by the Cement Concrete Road Surfacing Committee in
their meeting held at New Delhi on the 26 th November, 1974 and then processed by the
Specifications and Standards Committee. The work of present revision ofIRC:44 was taken up
by the Rigid Pavement Committee (B-3) and the revised draft as prepared by Dr. R.C. Wason,
S/Shri Sadashiv Gautam and Satander Kumar was approved by the Rigid Pavement Committee in
its meeting held on 24th March, 2008 for placing before the Highways Specifications and Standards
(HSS) Committee. The Highways Specifications and Standards Commitee approved the document
in its meeting held on 28 th March, 2008. The revised draft document incorporating the comments
ofthe HSS Committee was presented by Shri Y.K. Sinha alongwith S/Shri R.K. Jain and Satander
Kumar during the 185 th Council Meeting held on 11th April, 2008 at Aizawl (Mizoram) and it was
approved for printing. The names ofthe personnel of Rigid Pavement Committee (B-3) are given
below. %'
~,
~\
}'
Sinha, Y.K.
Convenor :;\
~!
Jain, R.K.
Co-Convenor :d
Kumar, Satander
Member-Secretary

Members

Basu, S.B. Kumar, Pushp

Chahal, H.S. Pandey, B.B., Dr.
Chaudhary, S.K. Phull, Y.R.
Gautam, Ashutosh Prasad, Bageshwar
Gautam, Sadashiv Rajawat, Y.K.
Gupta, Akhil Kumar Seehra, S.S., Dr.
Jain,A.K. Sharan, G.
Jain, M.K. Sharma, R.N.
Kadiyali, L.R., Dr. Singh, Prabhash
Kamat, S.Y. Singh,R.P.
Kumar, Ashok Wason, R.C. Dr.

i
!

-- 1
 IRC:44-2008

CorrespondingMembers

Justo, C.E.o., Dr. Reddy, B.B.

Ram, B.N. . Shroff, A.V.
Reddi, S.A. Thombare, Vishal

. Ex-officio Members
President, IRC (Mina, H.L.)
Director General (RD), MOSRT&H (Sharan, G.)
Secretary General, IRC (Sinha, V.K.)

In this second revision, the following major modifications have been made:

(a) The Guidelines recommend minimum M40 grade ofconcrete (flexural strength 4.5 MPa)
for construction of normal concrete pavements. For rural roads minimum M30 grade of
concrete (flexural strength 3.8 MPa) is recommended to be used. For whitetopping,
high performance concrete of grade M50 is recommended.

(b) All requirements ofIRC: 15 and IRC:58 so far as they apply, shall be deemed to form
part ofthese Guidelines. IRC:59-1976 "Guidelines for the Design ofGap Graded Cement
Concrete Mixes for Road Pavements" is withdrawn as gap graded concrete is not used
in cement concrete pavements these days. IRC:68-1976 "Tentative Guidelines on Cement
Fly Ash Concrete for Rigid Pavement Construction" also stands withdrawn. Relevant
details of this document have already been incorporated in' the present revised
document.

(c) The requirements for selection of water-cement ratio, water content and estimation of
coarse aggregate content and fine aggregate content have been reviewed and accordingly
modified. Similarly, the other requirements such as trial mixes, illustrative examples etc.,
have also been reviewed and modified.

(d) Illustrative examples ofconcrete mix proportioning using fly ash and silica fume as one
of the ingredients have been included.

In this revision, assistance has also been derived from ACI:211.1 (Re-approved 1997)
'Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete' ,
American Concrete Institute and also from IS: 10262 First Revision (Draft).

2. SCOPE

2.1. This standard lays down the guidelines for proportioning concrete mixes as per the
requirements, using the concrete making materials including other supplementary materials identified

_ ..
-'f' n' -q Trr-~·
IRC:44-2008

for this purpose. The proportioning is carried out to achieve specified characteristics at specified
age, workability of fresh concrete and durability requirements.

3. RELEVANT DEFINITIONS

For the purpose of these guidelines, the definitions given in IS:456, IS:4845 and
IS:6461 (Part-I to IV) shall generally apply. The commonly used terms are defined in
Annexure-A.
I
4. MATERIALS '5.:,.'

4.1. Cement .~~ ;

':;.

{if
Any ofthe following types ofcements capable of achieving the design strength and durability .~
may be used with prior approval ofthe Engineer. ~1
,'.,
';~~
.;

(i) Ordinary Portland Cement, 33 Grade, IS:269

(ii) Ordinary Portland Cement, 43 Grade,IS:8112
(iii) Ordinary Portland Cement, 53 Grade, IS: 12269
(iv) Portland Pozzolana Cement (flyash based), IS: 1489, Part I
(v) Portland Slag Cement, IS:455

4.2. Admixtures

4.2.1. Retarders, plasticisers and superplasticisers

Retarders, plasticisers and superplasticisers conforming to IS :9103 may be used upto

0.5 per cent, 1 per cent and 2 per cent by mass ofcementitious materials respectively as stipulated
in IS:456.

4.2.2. Air entraining admixture

In freezing weather, use of air entraining admixture is recommended to counter the freezing
and thawing effect. If air-entraining admixture is used for such conditions, the total quantity of air
in air-entrained concrete as a percentage of the volume ofthe mix shall be 5 ± 1.5 per cent for
20 mm nominal size aggregate. However, upto two per cent air by volume of concrete is used for
control ofbleeding and segregation in concrete.

4.3. Fibres

As stipulated in IS:456, fibres may be added to concrete for special applications to enhance
properties for which specialist literature may be consulted. Fibres shall be of steel/polymeric such
r

4
I
_1
 IRC:44-2008

as polypropylene/polyester/polyethylene/nylon and shall be uniformly dispersed in the concrete

mass at the time of concrete production.

To improve the ductility and fatigue lifeofhigh perforrnance/highstrengthconcrete, polymeric

fibres may be added in the concrete in the dosage 0.2-0.4 per cent by mass of cement. The
dosage of steel fibres shall be as per IRC:SP:46. Polymeric fibres shall have water absorption less
than 0.3 per cent and shall not affect the properties of concrete (i.e. reduction in the strength not
more than 5 per cent and entrapped air content not more than 3 per cent). The diameter of
polymeric fibres normally varies from 10-70 micron and specific gravity is in the range of
0.91-1.34.

4.4. Coarse Aggregate

Aggregate for pavement concrete shall be from natural sources complying with IS:383 with
Los Angeles Abrasion value not more than 35 per cent. The limits of deleterious materials shall not
exceed the requirements set out in Table 1 ofIS:383.

Table 1. Coarse Aggregates Requirements-for Single Sized and Graded Aggregates

lIS Sieve Percentage passing for single sized Percentage passing for
\ Designation Aggregate for Nominal size Graded Aggregate of Nominal Size

63mm 40mm 20mm 16mm 12.5 mm 1.0mm 40mm 20mm 16mm 12.5 mm

(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11 )

80 111m 100 - - - - - \00 - I - -

63mm 85 to \00 100 - - - - - - - -
40mm o to 30 85 to 100 100 - - - 95 to 100 100 -
20mm o to 5 o to 20 85 to \00 100 - - 30 to 70 95 to \00 100 100
16mm - - - 85 to ]00 100 - - 90 to 100 -
12.5mm - - - - 85 to 100 100 - - - 90 to 100
10mm o to 5 o to 5 o to 20 o to 30 o to 45 85 to 100 \ 0 to 35 25 to 55 30 to 70 40 to 85
4.75 mm - - o to 5 o to 5 o to \0 o to 20 o to 5 o to \0 o to 10 o to 10
2.36 mm - - - - - o to 5 - - - -

The aggregates shall be free from chert, flint, chalcedony or silica in a form that can react
with the alkalies in the cement. If aggregates are doubtful for alkali aggregate reactivity, IS:456
may be referred for preventive measures. The flakiness index of aggregates shall be less than 40
per cent. No aggregate which has water absorption more than 2 per cent shall be used in the
concrete mix. In situation where water absorption of aggregates is more than 2 per cent, the same
may be allowed subject to conformance to soundness test. However, maximum water absorption
shall not exceed 5 per cent. The aggregates shall be tested for soundness in accordance with
IS:2386 (Part V). After 5 cycles oftesting, the loss shall not be more than 12 per cent if sodium
sulphate solution is used and 18 per cent if magnesium sulphate solution is used.

-------< ."-_._~
IRC:44-2008

Rounded and semi crushed aggregates may be used with caution after studying the relevant
properties of strength, durability and abrasion resistance. Graded coarse aggregates for specified
nominal sizes as per IS :383 shall meet the requirements of Table 1.

4.5. Fine Aggregate

The fine aggregate shall consist ofclean natural sand or crushed stone sand or a combination
of the two and shall conform to IS:383. Fine aggregates shall be free from soft particles, clay,
shale, loam, cemented particles, mica and organic and other foreign matter. The limits ofdeleterious
materials shall not exceed the requirements set out in Table 1 ofIS:383.

Although IS:383 permits the fines passing 75 microns upto 15 per cent in case of stone :4r'
crusher dust, this provision should be used with caution only when crushed stone dust is used as a ,~.

fine aggregate and the mix produced in the laboratory and the field should be satisfactory in all
respects and shall comply with the specifications. The grading offine aggregates as per IS:383
shall be within the limits given in Table 2.

Table 2. Fine Aggregates Requirements

IS Sieve II
Percentage Passing for
Designation
Grading Zone I Grading Zone II Grading Zone III Grading Zone IV

10mm 100 100 100 100

4.i5mm 90-100 90-100 90-100 95 - 100
2.36mm 60-95 75 -100 85 - 100 95 -100
I I

1.18mm 30-70 55-90 75 -100 90-100

600 micron 15-34 35-59 60-79 80-100 I
300 micron 5-20 8-30 12-40 15- 50
150 micron 0-10 0-10 0-10 0-15

Note:­

I. Where the grading falls outside the limits of any particular grading zone of sieves other than 600-micron
IS: Sieve by a total amount not exceeding 5 per cent, it shall be regarded as falling within that grading
zone. This tolerance shall not be applied to percentage passing the 600-micron IS: Sieve or to percentage
passing any other sieve size on the coarse limit of grading Zone lor the finer limit of grading Zone IV.

2. For crushed stone sands, the permissible limit on ISO-micron IS: Sieve is increased to 20 per cent.

3. Zones here do not depict the location/region. They depict the gradation offine aggregates in a descending
order.

 lRC:44-2008

4.6. MineralAdmixtures

Following materials may be added as mineral admixtures as per their availability:

(i) Fly ash (as per 1S:3812 (Part-I)-2003: Maximum dosage: 20 per cent by mass of
cementitious materials
(ii) Granulated blast furnace slag (as per 1S:12089)
(iii) Silica fume (as per IS: 15388 and IS:456, lRC:SP:70): The silica fume (very fine non­
crystalline silicon dioxide) is a by-product ofthe manufacture of silicon, ferrosilicon or
the like, from quartz and carbon in electric arc furnace. It is usually used in proportion
of 5 to ]0 per cent ofthe cementitious material content ofthe mix. Use of silica fume is
generally advantageous for higher grades of concrete i.e. M50 and above and for high
performance concrete with special requirements e.g. higher abrasion resistance of
concrete.
(iv) Metakaoline

4.7. Water

Water used for mixing and curing ofconcrete shall be clean and free from injurious amounts
of oil, salt, acid, vegetable matter or other substances harmful to the concrete. It shall meet the
requirements stipulated in IS:456. Potable water is generally considered satisfactory for mixing
and curing.

5. DATA FOR MIX PROPORTIONING

The following data are required for mix proportioning of a particular grade of concrete:

(a) Grade designation (required compressive strength/flexural strength)

(b) Type of cement
(c) Maximum nominal size ofaggregate
(d) Minimum and maximum cement contents
(e) Maximum water-cement ratio
(f) Workability
(g) Method oftransporting and placement of concrete
(h) Temperature of concrete at the time ofplacement. The temperature ofthe concrete at
the time of placement shall not exceed 30°C and shall not be less than SoC
(i) Type of aggregates
G) Whether a chemical and mineral admixture shall or shall not be used and the type of
admixture and the condition ofuse
(k) Whether fibres shall or shall not be used and type and specification offibres to be used

...

--
IRC:44-2008

6. DESIGN STRENGTH

6.1. The cement concrete pavements are designed on flexural strength of concrete. However,
general practice is to design the mix on cube compressive strength and relationship between
characteristic compressive strength and flexural strength as per IS:456 is as follows:

f cr == 0.7 x {J::
Where,
ler flexural strength (modulus ofrupture), N'mm?
lek characteristic compressive cube strength of concrete, Nzmm?

6.2. In order that not more than the specified proportions oftest results are likely to fall
below the characteristic strength, the concrete mix has to be proportioned for somewhat higher
target mean compressive strength,f'ck. The margin over characteristic strength is given by the
following relation:
-~
'if1
f'ck == lek + t x s '.J
;:1
1
Where, ;!
:,1

r: target mean compressive strength at 28 days, Nzrnm?

characteristic compressive strength at 28 days, Nzrnm?
I
-j
lek :·i
S standard deviation, Nzmrrr' i
t standard normal variate which is taken as 1.65 as per IS:456 for accepted \
(
failure of 1 in 20.

6.3. Standard Deviation

The standard deviation for each grade ofconcrete shall be determined separately.

6.3.1. Standard Deviation Based on Test Strength of Samples

(a) Number oftest results.of samples - The total number oftest strength of samples required

to constitute an acceptable record for calculation of standard deviation shall be not less

than 30. Attempts should be made to obtain the 30 samples (taken from site), as early as

possible, when a mix is used for the first time, to validate and improve the job mix

formula (ifrequired).

(b) In case of significant changes in concrete - When significant changes are made in the
production of concrete batches (for example, changes in the materials used, mix
proportioning, equipment or technical control), the standard deviation value shall be
separately calculated for such batches of concrete.

8
j

n t T _·It
1
 IRC:44-2008

(c) Standard deviation to be brought up to date - The calculation of the standard deviation
shall be brought up to date after every change ofmix proportioning.

6.3.2. Assumed Standard Deviation

Where sufficient test results for a particular grade of concrete are not available, the value of
standard deviation given in Table 3 may be assumed for proportioning ofmix in the first instance.
These values correspond to the site control having proper storage of cement; weigh batching ofall
materials; controlled addition of water; regular checking of all materials, aggregate grading and
moisture content and periodical checking ofworkability and strength. Where there is deviation in
the site conditions, the values given in the above Table shall be increased by 1 Nzmm', As soon as
the results of samples are available, actual calculated standard deviation shall be used and the mix
re-proportioned accordingly. (However, when adequate past records for a similar grade exist and
are justified to the designer, a value of standard deviation different from that shown in Table 3 is
permitted to be used). Typical examples of design strengths of concrete for M60, M40 and M30
grades for different degrees of quality control are given in Annexure B.

Table 3. Assumed Standard Deviation

SINo. Grade of Concrete Assumed Standard Deviation (Nzmm')

1 M25 4.0
2 M30
~

M35
4 M40
5 M45 5.0
6 M50
7 M55
8 M60

Note: The above values shall also be applicable where Ready Mixed Concrete (RMC) is used.

7. SELECTION OF MIX PROPORTIONS

7.1. Selection of Water-Cement Ratio

Since different cements, supplementary cementitious materials and aggregates of different

maximum size, grading, surface texture, shape and other characteristics may produce concretes of
different compressive strength for the same free water-cement ratio, the relationship between
strength and free water-cement ratio should preferably be established for the materialsactually to
be used. In the absence of such data, the preliminary free water-cement ratio (by mass)
corresponding to the design strength of concrete at 28 days may be selected from the established
relationship, if available. Otherwise, the Table 4 given below may be used as a starting point for
selection of water-cement ratio.

<)
 ..~.

,~~.
IRC:44-2008 "t
,.. "!

.'::-~
Table 4. Preliminary Selection of Water ­ Cement Ratio for the Given Grade

81 No. Grade of Concrete Approximate Water/ Cement Ratio I:~

I M25 0.50
I
;i<.
'~'-
2
3
M30
M35
0.45
0.42 'I
4
5
M40
M50
0.38
0.34
;;1

H
6 M60 0.28

Note:
(1) The Supplementary cementitious materials that is, mineral admixtures shall also be considered in water-cement ratio
calculations and be referred as water-cementitious materials ratio ..
(2) The maximum water cement/cementitious material ratio shall be restricted to 0.50 for the respective grade as per
IRe: 15-2002.
.~
7.2. Selection of Water Content -s~

.;~

The water content of concrete is influenced by a number of factors such as aggregate size,
aggregate shape, aggregate texture, workability, water-cement ratio, cement and other supplementary
'.~;
cementitious materials type and content, chemical admixture and environmental conditions. An ~
:~
increase in aggregates size, a reduction in water-cement ratio and slump and use of rounded \
aggregates and water reducing admixtures will reduce the water demand. On the other hand
increased temperature, cement content, slump, water-cement ratio, aggregate angularity and a
.~

;!

decrease in the proportion ofthe coarse aggregate to fine aggregate will increase the water demand.
The quantity of approximate mixing water per unit volume of concrete may be determined
from Table 5. The water content in Table 5 is for angular coarse aggregate and for 20 mm ±
5 mm slump, at water: cement or cementitious material ratio = 0.50 and may be adjusted after
trials. The water content suggested in Table 5 may be reduced by approximately 10 kg for sub­
angular aggregates, 20 kg for gravel with some crushed particles and 25 kg for rounded gravel to
produce same workability. The water content requirement can be suitably decreased by use of
plasticizer and super plasticizer. The extent of reduction in water content will depend upon the 1

quality of plasticier/super plasticizer for normally available plasticizers/super plasticizers. The range
of decrease in water content is between 5 per cent to 10 per cent for plasticizer and between
J

20 per cent to 30 per cent for super plasticizer. The actual reduction will depend upon the doses of
these plasticiers/super-plasticizers, By suitably adjusting the doses, the desired reduction in water
content within the limits prescribed above can be achieved.
7.3. Calculation ofCementitious Material Content
The cement and supplementary cementitious material content per unit volume ofconcrete may be
calculated from the free water-cement or cementitious material ratio (See para 7.1) and the quantity of
water per unit volume ofconcrete.
The cementitious material content, socalculated, shall be checkedagainstthe minimumandmaximum
cement contentrequirements. Incase cementitiousmaterialcontentworked out is lowerthan the minimum
cement content, then the minimum cement content value shall be adopted.

10
 IRC:44-2008

Table S. Approximate Water Content per Cubic Metre of Concrete for Nominal
Maximum Size of Aggregate (with out Plasticiser/Superplasticiser)
Nominal Maximum Size of Aggregate (mm) Suggestive Water Content 1 (kg)

10 208
20 186 *
40 165

, * Water content corresponding to saturated surface dry aggregate

* The water content is 186 kg/rn" for 20 mm aggregate without plasticizing or superplasticising admixture, for 20 mm
± 5 mm slump at the time of placing. The water content may reduce to 167 kg/rn? assuming 10 per cent reduction in
water content by use of plasticizing admixture or reduces to 149 kg/m" assuming 20 per cent reduction in water
J content by use of superplasticising admixture.
Note:
(I) These quantities of mixing water shall be used in computing cementitious material contents for trial batches.
(2) For the high workability required at batching plant/RMC plant, the use of plasticizing or superplasticizing admixture
may be adopted preferably without the need of increasing water content for additional slump requirement. On
account oflong distances over which concrete needs to be carried in road projects e.g from RMC plant, the concrete
mix is generally designed for a higher slump using plasticizers. The quantity of admixtures shall be determined by
trials and the initial slump value shall depend on the distance of transport and loss of slump with time.
(3) As mentioned, water content can be reduced by 20 per cent depending upon texture, shape and grading of aggregates
in the mix. Efforts shall be made that the water content should be as minimum as possible as derived by trial mixes
and shall be as per para 7.2.
(4) In case of nominal size of aggregate of 40 mm, precautions for minimizing segregation in concrete may be taken and
efforts shall be made to limit the maximum size particle to 31.5 mm as per IS:460 (Part 2).

Minimum cementitious material content shall be 325 kg/m', This is irrespective ofthe grade of
cement and is inclusive ofmineral admixture additions such as fly ash, or ground granulated blast furnace
slag. These mineral admixtures may be taken into account in the concrete composition with respect to
the minimum cement content ifthe suitability is established and as long as the maximum amounts taken
into account do not exceed the limit ofpozzolona and slag specified in IS: 1489(Part 1) and IS:455
respectively and stipulated in these guidelines. The maximum cement content shall be 425 kg/m' and is
1 exclusive ofmineral admixtures such as flyash, silica fume or ground granulated blast furnace slag.

I 7.4. Estimation of Coarse and Fine Aggregate Contents

7.4.1. Estimation of Coarse Aggregate Proportion in Total Aggregate

Aggregates of essentially the same nominal maximum size, type and grading will produce
concrete of satisfactory workability when a given volume of coarse aggregate is used per unit
volume of concrete. Approximate values for this aggregate volume are given in Table 6 for a
water-cement ratio of 0.5 which may be suitably adjusted for other water-cement ratios. It can be
seen that for equal workability, the volume of coarse aggregate in a unit volume of concrete is
dependent only on its nominal maximum size and grading zone offine aggregate. Differences in the
amount of mortar required for workability with different aggregates, due to differences in particle
shape and grading, are compensated by change in coarse to fine aggregate ratios.

11

IRC:44-2008

Table 6: Volume of Coarse Aggregate per Unit Volume of Total Aggregate for
Different Zones of Fine Aggregate as per IS: 383 ,
:~
~
,St

Nominal Maximum Volume of Coarse Aggregate Per Unit Volume of Total Aggregate for v
Size of Aggregate (mm) Different Zones of Fine Aggregate I
I .~
Zone IV Zone II I
Zone I
I
Zone III

I
I
10
20
0.50
0.66
0.48
0.64
0.46
0.62
I
I
I
0.44
0.60
J I
:~

40 0.75 0.73 0.71 0.69

\ I I I
Note:
(I) Volumes are based on aggregates in saturated surface dry condition
(2) These volumes are for angular aggregate and suitable adjustments may be made for other shapes of aggregate.
(3) The above Table is valid for W/C ratio of 0.50. For every decrease of 0.05 in W/C ratio, the above ratiorvolume of coarse

aggregates) will be increased approximately by I percent. The above table is applicable for crushed aggregates. For

rounded/semi crushed aggregates, the above values ofthe volumes may be slightly increased.

7.4.2. Estimation of Coarse and Fine Aggregate Contents

With the completion of procedure given in paras 7.2 and 7.3, all the ingredients have been

estimated except the coarse and fine aggregate content. These quantities are determined by finding

out the absolute volume of cementitious material, water and the chemical admixture; by dividing

their mass by their respective specific gravity, multiplying by 1/1000 and subtracting the result of

their summation from unit volume. The values so obtained are divided into coarse and fine aggregate

fractions by volume in accordance with coarse aggregate proportion already determined in para

704.1. The coarse and fine aggregate contents are then determined by multiplying absolute volume

with their respective specific gravities and multiplying by 1000.

7.4.3. Combination of Different Coarse Aggregate Fractions

Coarse aggregates of different sizes shall be combined in suitable proportions so as to result

in an overall grading conforming to Table 1 for particular nominal maximum size of aggregate.

8. TRIAL MIXES

The calculated mix proportions shall be checked by means oftrial batches.

Workabilityofthe Trial Mix No.1 shallbe measured. The mix shall be carefully observed for

freedom from segregation and bleeding and its finishing properties. Ifthe measured workability of

Trial Mix No.1 is different from the stipulated value, the water and/or admixture content shall be

adjusted suitably. With this adjustment, the mix proportion shall be recalculated keeping the free

water-cement ratio at the pre-selected value, which will comprise Trial Mix No.2. In addition,

two more Trial Mixes No.3 and 4 shall be made with the water content same as Trial Mix No.2

and varying the free water-cement ratio by± 10 per cent of the pre-selected value.

12

----_1

 lRC:44-2008

Mix No.2 to 4 normally provides sufficient information, including the relationship between
compressive strength and water-cement ratio, from which the mix proportions for field trails may
he arrived at. The concrete for field trials shall be produced by methods of actual concrete
production.

9. PROCEDURE FOR MIX PROPORTIONING

For design ofmix it will be necessary to carry out the following tests:­

(a) Cement (i) Compressive strength at 3, 7, and 28 days (1S:4031)

(ii) Specific gravity of cement (IS:4031)

(b) Aggregate (i) Specific gravity (1S:2386)

(ii) Per cent water absorption (1S:2386)
(iii) Sieve analysis (IS:2386)
(iv) Fineness modulus of fine aggregate

(c) Water It shall conform to IS :456

(d) Selection ofaggregate grading:­

The grading of coarse and fine shall be as per Table 1 and 2 respectively.

(e) Consider standard normal variate, t

for 1 in 20 tolerance = 1.65

(f) Assumed/determined Standard Deviation, as per Table 3/para 6.3.2 respectively

(g) Determine design strength as per para,6.2

(h) Select W/C ratio from Table 4

(i) Select water content per cubic metre of concrete from Table 5

(j) Determine cement content-dividing water content by W/C ratio

(k) Find of coarse and fine aggregate contents from Table 6 and para 7.4.2

(I) Alternatively, knowing the water-cementlcementitious ratio, water requirement, cement/

cernentitious content (from water-cement ratio and water requirement) and proportion of
sand in total aggregates (1- volume of coarse aggregate per unit volume oftotal aggregates as

13

IRC:44-2008

given in Table 6) by absolute volume, the sand and coarse aggregate content per unit volume
of concrete may be calculated separately from Eq. (2) and Eq. (3).

v= (W+ C/S e + liP * S/Ss) 111 000, ....(2)

and

v = (W+ C/S e + lI(l-P) * A/Sa) 111000 .... (3)

Where,

v absolute volume ofthe wet mix = gross volume, 1 cum

W mass of water in kg (= litre) per cum of concrete
C mass of cement in kg per cum of concrete
S mass of sand in kg per cum of concrete
A mass of coarse aggregate in kg per cum of concrete
P proportion (in decimal fraction) of sand in total aggregate determined on
the basis of absolute volume, and
S,S,S
c s a,
specific gravities of cement, sand and coarse aggregate respectively

Note:- In case chemical admixtures (plasticizers/super plasticizers) and mineral admixtures (fly
ash, silica fume, slag etc.) are also used in the mix; their absolute volume (mass/specific
gravity) will also be considered in Eqs. (2) & (3).

10. An illustrative example ofconcrete mix proportioning for conventional concrete pavement
is given in Annexure-C for M40 grade of concrete with and without flyash. Another illustrative
example of M60 grade of concrete for special applications, using silica fume is given in
Annexure-D. These examples are merely illustrative to explain the procedure and the actual
mix proportioning shall be based on trial batches with the given materials.

The quantities of coarse and fine aggregates are based on aggregates in saturated surface
dry conditions. To determine the mix proportion based on aggregate in dry condition, the quantities
of both coarse and fine aggregates shall be multiplied with their respective water absorptions.
The values thus determined shall be adjusted to reduce the aggregate content and increase the
water content by the same amount for per cum. of concrete based on their respective water
absorption values.

j
14
I
1
 IRC:44-2008

ANNEXURE-A
DEFINITIONS OF COMMONLY USED TERMS

Characteristic Strength: The characteristic strength is defined as the strength of material

below which not more than 5 per cent of the test results are expected to fall.
Hydraulic Cement: Finely ground material which on addition ofrequisite quantity of water is
capable ofhardening both under water and in air by the chemical interaction of its constituents with
water and is also capable of binding together appropriate materials.
Pozzolana: An essentially siliceous material which while in itself possessing little or no
cementitious properties will, in finely divided form and in the presence ofwater, react with calcium
hydroxide at ambient temperature to form compounds possessing cementitious properties.
Granulated Blastfurnace Slag: Blastfurnace slag in granulated form is used for the
manufacture of hydraulic cement. Blastfurnace slag is non-metallic product consisting essentially
of glass containing silicates and alumina silicates oflime and other bases, which are developed
simultaneously with iron in blast furnace or electric pig iron furnace. Granulated slag is obtained by
further processing the molten slag by rapidly chilling or quenching it with water or steam and air.
Aggregate: Granular material, generally inert, such as natural sand, manufactured sand,

gravel, crushed gravel, crushed stone, and air-cooled iron blast furnace slag which when bound

together into a conglomerated mass by a matrix forms concrete or mortar.

Coarse Aggregate: Aggregate most ofwhich is retained on 4.75 mrn IS Sieve and containing
only so much of finer material as is permitted by the specification OR portion of an aggregate
retained on the 4.75 mm IS Sieve.
Note I - The definitions are alternatives to be applied under differing circumstances.
Note 2 - Coarse aggregate may be described as:
(a) Crushed gravel- coarse aggregate produced by crushing gravel
(b) Crushed stone - coarse aggregate produced by crushing of hard stone
(c) Uncrushed gravel- coarse aggregate resulting from natural disintegration ofrock;
(d) Partially crushed gravel or stone when it is a product ofthe blending of (a) and (b);
and
(e) Manually broken stone that is produced by breaking hard stone manually with hammers.
of
Fine Aggregate : Aggregate most which passes 4.75 mm IS Sieve and containing only so
much coarser material as is permitted for various grading zones in the specification. Fine aggregate
may be described as follows:
Natural Sand - Fine aggregate resulting from the natural disintegration of rock and/or which
has been deposited by streams or glacial agencies.
Crushed Stone Sand - Fine aggregate produced by crushing hard stone.
Crushed Gravel Sand - Fine aggregate produced by crushing natural gravel.

15
 ~
t
I
N
o
o
00

ANNEXURE-B

TYPICAL EXAMPLES OF DESIGN STRENGTHS OF CONCRETE FOR DIFFERENT DEGREES OF QUALITY CONTROL

Value of 't' = 1.65 for tolerance value of 1:20

Degree of Min. Specified Concrete Stiength (Nzmm/) at28 days

Quality I Grade of Concrete = M60 Grade of Concrete = M40 Grade ofConcrete = M30
Control Flexural Strength = 5.42 Nzmm' Flexural Strength=4.43 Nzmrn" Flexural Strength=3.83 N/mm2

Standard Design Camp. Design Standard Design Design Standard Design Design
0\
Deviation Strength Flexural . Deviation Compo Flexural Deviation Compo Flexural
(Nzmm') (N/rrim2) Strength (N/mm2) Strength Strength (Nmm') Strength Strength
(Nrnm') (N/mm2) (Nrmm') (N/mm2) (Nrnm')

Proper Site Control 5.0 6825 5.78 5.0 4825 4.86 5.0 3825 4.33

Poor Site Control 6.0 69.90 5.85 6.0 49.90 4.94 6.0 39.90 4.42

····_~----------~~==_
__
..=_........
..... .....".."
t m •. -

~~--
_ ..!
_.
" " ".".
,------_..._-------­
.....m

.' ..... _
 IRC:44 . .2 008

ANNEXURE-C
(Clause 10)

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE ON CONCRETE MIX PROPORTIONING

C-O An example illustrating the mix proportioning for a concrete ofM40 grade is given below.

C-l STIPULATIONS FOR PROPORTIONING

(a) Grade designation M40

(b) Type of cement OPC 43 grade conforming to 18:8112
(c) Maximum nominal size of aggregate 20mm
(d) .Minimum cement content 325 kg/m'
(e) Maximum water-cement ratio 0.50
(f) Workability 20 ± 5 mm (slump)
(g) Degree of supervision Good
(h) Type of aggregate Crushed angular aggregate
. (i) Maximum cement content 425 kg/m'
G) Chemical admixture type Superplasticizer

C-2 TEST DATA FOR MATERIALS

(a) Cement used OPC 43 grade conforming to IS:8112

(b) Specific gravity

Cement 3.15
Coarse aggregate 2.74
Fine aggregate 2.62

(c) Water absorption

(I) Coarse aggregate 0.5 per cent
(2) Fine aggregate 1.0 per cent

(d) Free (surface) moisture

(I) Coarse aggregate Nil (absorbed moisture also nil)
(2) Fine aggregate Nil

(e) Sieve analysis

(I) Coarse aggregate IS Analysis of Percentage Passing of Different Percentage
Sieve Coarse Aggregate Fractions passing for
sizes Fraction, % Passing graded
1"­
mm aggregate as
per Table I
I II I II Combined
20 to 10 IOmm 60 40 100
mm down per cent per cent per cent

20 100.00 100.00 60.00 40.00 100.00 95-100

10 2.80 78.30 1.68 31.30 32.98 25-55
4.75 Nil 8.70 3.48 3.48 0-10

(2) Fine aggregate Conforming to grading Zone II of Table 2

-. 17

. . tZT 7 W'ii'X- ? fi ·.,..r" ",-_Wr"'''' ..-"'~C .""':_' <' ",­

IRC:44-2008

C-3 DESIGN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR MIX PROPORTIONING

J'ck==fck + 1.65 x s

Where
lck == target average compressive strength, Nzrnm? at 28 days.
1Ck == characteristic compressive strength, Nrrnm' at 28 days.
s = standard deviation, Nzmm'

From Table 3, Standard Deviation = 5.0 Nzmm?

Therefore, design compressive strength = 40 + 1.65 x 5.0 = 48.25 N/mm2

Design flexural strength using IS: 456 relationship = 4.86 Nrmm'

C-4 SELECTION OF WATER-CEMENT RATIO

From Table 4, preliminary water-cement ratio = 0.38

0.38 < 0.50, hence OX.

C-S SELECTION OF WATER CONTENT

From Table 5, water content for 20 mm aggregate = 1·86kg/rrr' at W/C == 0.5

As super plasticizer is proposed to be used, the water content can be reduced maximum upto

30% (vide para 7.2 for details). For the purpose ofpresent trial exercise, a reduction of water content

of 15% has been assumed by adjusting suitably the doses ofthe super plasticizer. The designer can use

this reduction as per his requirement ofthe availability ofthe grade of cement and quality of super

plasticizer. With 15% reduction in water content at water-cement ratio of 0.38, the reduced water

content equals to 186 xO.85= 158.1 kg, say 158 kg.

C-6 CALCULATION OF CEMENT CONTENT

Water-cement ratio 0.38

Water content = 158 kg/m'

Cement content = 158/0.38 = 415.80 kg/rn", say 416.0 kg/rn'

Check for minimum and maximum cement content as per IRC: 15

Minimum cement content as per IRC: 15, :25 kg/rrr' <416 kg/m' Hence, O.K

Maximum cement content as per IRC: 15,425 kg/m3>416 kg/rn' Hence, OX

18

-:;­
 IRC:44-2008

C-7 PROPORTION OF VOLUME OF COARSE AGGREGATE AND FINE AGGREGATE

From Table 6, volume of coarse aggregate corresponding to 20 mm size aggregate and fine
aggregate grading Zone II == 0.62 per unit volume oftotal aggregate. This is valid for water-cement
ratio of0.50. As water-cement ratio is actually 0.38, the ratio is taken as 0.64 to reduce sand content
(as per Note 3 ofTable 6).

Volume of fine aggregate content = 1- 0.64 0.36 per unit volume oftotal aggregate

C-8 MIX CALCULATIONS

(a) Volume of concrete 1 m'

(b) Volume of cement (Mass ofcement/Specific gravity ofcement) x (1/1 000)
= (416/3.15) x (1/1000)
= 0.132 m'
(c) Volume ofwater (Mass of water/Specific gravity of water) x (lIfOOO)
= (158/1) x (1/1000)
= 0.158 m'
(d) Volumeofchemical (Mass ofchemical admixture/Specific gravity ofadmixture) x
admixture (1/1000)
(superplasticizer) = (2.50/1.2) x (111000)
[@ 0.6% by mass of = 0.002 m'
cementitious material]

(e) Volume ofall in = {a - (b+c+d)}= {1-(0.132+0.158+0.002)}

aggregate = 0.708 m'
(f) Mass of coarse = (e) x 0.64 x Specific gravity of coarse aggregate x 1000
aggregate = 0.708 x 0.64 x 2.74 x 1000
= 1241.5 Say 1242 kg/nr'
(g) Mass offine = (e) x 0.36 x Specific gravity of fine aggregate x 1000
aggregate = 0.708 x 0.36 x 2.62 x 1000
= 667.8 Say 668 kg/m'

C-9.1 MIX PROPORTIONS FOR TRIAL NUMBER 1 BASED ON AGGREGATE IN

SSD CONDITION

Cement = 416 kg/m'

Water = 158 kg/rrr'

Fine Aggregate = 668 kg/rrr'

Coarse Aggregate = 1242 kg/rrr'

Chemical Admixture = 2.50 kg/rrr'

Water-cement ratio = 0.38

.~i_ 19

:"-'"'''''.-t'''''
 ,/

IRC:44-2008

C-9.2 MIX PROPORTIONS FOR TRIAL NUMBER 1 BASED ON AGGREGATE IN

DRY CONDITION
Cement = 416 kg/m"

Water =158+6.68+6.21 =170.9 kg/m'

Chemical Admiture = 2.50 kg/m'

Fine Aggregate = 661.3 kg (668-1 % of 668)

Coarse Aggregate = 1235.8 kg (1242-0.5% of 1242)

C-IO The slump shall be measured and the water content and dosage ofadmixture shall be adjusted
for achieving the required slump based on trial, if required. The mix proportions shall be
reworked for the actual water content and checked for durability requirements.

C-ll Two more trials having variation of ± 1O'per cent of water-cement ratio in C-IO shall be
~I
carried out and a graph between three water-cement ratios and their corresponding strengths ,
~

::.
shall be plotted to work out the mix proportions for the given target strength for field trials.
However, minimum arid maximum cement content requirements should be met.

C-12 Adjustment due to higher slump requirements for use ofRMC can be made as follows:

Based on initial trials, it has been established that for expected 1 hour transit time initial slump
requirement is 100 mm for 20 mm slump at the time of placement.

Based on trials dosage of admixture may be increased from 0.6 per cent to 1.0 per cent by
mass ofcement to achieve required workability (accordingly all other calculations can be modified).

C-13 IN CASE IT IS PROPOSED TO USE FLY ASH IN THE CONCRETE

C-13.1 CALCULATION OF CEMENT AND FLYASH CONTENTS

1·
Water-cement ratio 0.38

Cement content 158/0.38 = 416 kg/m'

Now, to proportion a mix containing fly ash the following.steps are suggested:
s
(i) Decide percentage offly ash to be used based on project requirement and quality of
materials
(ii) * Increase the cementitious material content by 10% oftotal cementitious material content
of control mix calculated as above, to account for fly ash reactivity.

Cementitious material content = 416 x 1.10 = 457.6 kg/ru', ~ay 458 kg/m"

* In certain situations increase in cementitious material content may be warranted. The decision
on increase in cementitious material and its percentage may be based on experience and trial. This
illustrative example is with increase of 10 per cent cementitious material content.

20
 IRC:44-2008

Water Content == 158 kg/m'

So, water-cementitious material ratio == 158/458 = 0.345

Fly ash @ 20 per cent oftotal cementitious content == 458 x 20% = 91.6 kg/m',

say 92 kg/m'
Cement (OPC) == 458 -92 = 366 kg/m'

Check for maximum cement content

Maximum cement (OPC) content as per IRC: 15,425 kg/m3> 366 kg/m'
Hence, OK

Check for minimum cementitious content, 325kg/m3< 458kg/m3 (366kg/m3OPC+ 92 kg/nr'

flyash) Hence, OK

C-13.2 PROPORTION OF VOLUME OF COARSE AGGREGATE AND FINE

AGGREGATE CONTENT

From Table 6, volume of coarse aggregate corresponding to 20 mm size aggregate and fine
aggregate Zone II = 0.62 per unit volume of'total aggregate. This is valid for water-cement ratio of
0.50. As water-cement ratio is actually 0.345, the ratio is taken as 0.65 to reduce sand content.

Volume of fine aggregate content = 1- 0.65 == 0.35 per unit volume of total aggregate

C-13.3 MIX CALCULATIONS

(a) Volumeofconcrete 1 m'

(b) Volume ofcement (Mass ofcement/Specific gravity ofcement) x (1/1000)

=(366/3.15)x 1/1000
=0.1l6m3

(c) Volumeofflyash (Mass offly ash/Specific gravity offly ash) x 111000

= (9212.2) x 1/1000
=0.042 m'

(d) Volume ofwater (Mass ofwater/Specific gravity of water) x 111000

=(15811)x 1/1000
= 0.158 m 3

(e) Volume ofchemical (Mass ofchemical admixtUre/Specific gravity of

admixture (superplasticizer) admixture) x (l11000)
[@ 0.8% by Mass of = (3.66/1.2) x 111000
cementitious material] = 0.003 m 3

~
21
IRC:44-2008

(f) Volume ofall-in­ = {a-(b+c+d+e)}

aggregate = {1-(0.116+0.042+0.158+0.003)}

= 0.681 m'

(g) Mass of coarse = (f) x volume ofcoarse aggregate x Specific gravity ofcoarse
aggregate aggregate x 1000

= 0.681 x 0.65 x 2.74 x 1000

= 1212.9 Say 1213 kg/m'

(h) Mass offine = (f) x volume offine aggregate x Specific gravityoffme

aggregate aggregate x 1000

= 0.681 x 0.35 x 2.62 x 1000

= 624.5 Say 625 kg/rn'

C-13.4.1 MIX PROPORTIONS FOR TRIAL NUMBER 1 ON AGGREGATE IN

(SATURATED SURFACE DRY) SSD CONDITION

Cement = 366 kg/rri'

Fly Ash = 92 kg/rn'

Water = 158 kg/m'

Fine Aggregate = 625 kg/m'

Coarse Aggregate = 1213 kg/m'

~ t

Chemical Admixture = 3.66 kg/m'

Water-cementitious material ratio = 0.345

C-13.4.2 MIX PROPORTIONS FOR TRIAL NUMBER 1 ON AGGREGATE IN DRY

CONDITION

Cement = 366 kg/m'

Fly Ash = 92 kg/m'

Water = 158+6.3+6.1 = 170.4 kg

Fine Aggregate =
618.7 kg/m3(625-1 % of625)
Coarse Aggregate =
1206.9 kg/m3(1213-0.5% of1213)

Chemical Admixture = 3.66 kg/rn'

Water-cementitious material ratio = 0.345

All other steps will remain same as C-1 0 to C-12.

22

 IRC:44-2008
./

.~ :
ANNEXURE-D
: '
" (Clause 10)

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE ON CONCRETE MIX PROPORTIONING

D-O An example illustrating the mix proportioning for a concrete ofM60 grade using silica
fume is given below. The silica fume (very fine non-crystalline silicon dioxide) is a by-product of
the manufacture of silicon, ferrosilicon or the .like, from quartz and carbon in electric arc furnace. It
is usually used in proportion of S'to 10 per cent ofthe cementitious material content ofthe mix.
'Use of silica fume is generally advantageous for higher gradesof concrete i.e. M5o.and above and
for high performance concrete with special requirements e.g, higher abrasion resistance ofconcrete.
,

D-1 STIPULATIONS FOR PROPORTIONING fi(J

(a) Grade designation r v: M60 ."" "

,~ ,
(b) Type ofcement OPC43 'grade conformingto lS:8112
(c) Silica fume I Conforming to IS:15388
I
(d) Maximum nominal sizeofaggregate 20mm
(e) Minimum cement content 325 kg/m'
(f) Maximum water-cement ratio 0.40
(g) Workability '" 20 ±Smni (shimp)
(h) Degree ofsupervision Good ' .
(i) Type ofaggregate Crushed angul~'aggtegat~
G) Maximum cement content 425 kg/m' (Ope)
(k) Chemical admixture type Superplasticizer .
., T
D-2 TEST DATA FO'k'MATERIALS
., '. ' p',.
(a) Cement used OPC43gradeconfomlin'gtoIS:8112

(b) ~0~~:Vity 3.1:5 r " : ; ... .l'.;., ; I

(2) Silicafume 2.20 " . ., .':, ;:" ... '

(3) Coarse aggregate 2.74 ~. . . .
(4) Fine aggregate r 2.62 ' J . r' r "
... _rl~;-~\ .. _~i.~ 'l,'" ..

(c) Water absorption . .

(l) Coarse aggregate' jil;b: .. '-'O'.',fpertfen(: r u.. .!,; .. ,. j' .

(2) Fine aggregate 1.0 per c e n t ' ;

m~;~=:lIt~. i:
'{'cl}1 XfFfu~(siliia~eYn1tiisrrJe";"':'" ,d (;;~ ,.c';; ;";. <»: '- ;.... . ' '. ' . '

"~~ (absdrbealnbisturt; alsoriilj' :';:r .." .,.

, i

23

gt J?rttT'*PZ'V i '!ft"§tFflt#..--- '" __ ~

.--",,_,c,,~"_,
IRC:44-2008

(e) Sieve analysis

(I) Coarse IS Analysis of Percentage Passing of Percentage
Aggregate Sieve Coarse Aggregate Different Fractions Passing for
sizes Fraction, % Graded
mn passing Aggregate
(as per
I II I II Combined Table 1)
00 40 100
per cent per cent per cent

2f) 100.00 100.00 60.00 40.00 100.00 95-100

10 2.80 7830 1.68 3130 3298 25-55
4.75 N'd 8.70 3.48 3.48 0-10

(2) Fine Aggregate Conforming to grading Zone II ofTable 2

D-3 DESIGN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR MIX PROPORTIONING

J'ck= fck + 1.65 X s

Where
F ck= target average compressive strength, Nrrnrn? at 28 days.
fck = characteristics compressive strength, Nzmm? at 28 days.

s = standard deviation, Nzmm?

From Table 3, standard deviation = 5.0 Nzmrrf

Therefore, design compressive strength = 60 + 1.65 x 5.0 = 68.25 Nzmm? ,

Design flexural strength using 18:456 relationships = 5.78 Nzmm?

D-4 SELECTION OF WATER-CEMENT RATIO

From Table 4, preliminary water-cement ratio = 0.28

0.28 < 0.50, hence O.K.
' ..
, D-5SELECTIONOFWATERCONTENT

From Table 5, water content for 20 mm aggregate = 186 kg/m'

(for 20 ± 5 mm slump)

As superplasticizeris used, the water content can be reduced up to ~Oper cent maximum.
Hence, the reduced water content = 186 x 0.70·= 130.2 kg say 130kg/m3 ­

24

--------------
 lRC:~~200g

D-6 CALCULATION OF CEMENT CONTENT

Water-eeIIientitious materials ratio = 0.28

Water content = 130kg/m3
Cementitious content = 130/0.28 = 464.3 kg/m', say 464 kg/m"
Silicafume @ 10% by weight of
Cementitious Material = 464 x 10%= 46 kg/m'
Cement Content = 464 - 46= 418 kg/m'

Check for maximum cement content

Maximum cement (OPC) content as per IRC:15, 425 kg/m'> 418 kg/m'
Hence, OK

Check for minimum cernentitious content, 325 kg/m' < 464 kg/m" (418 kg/m" OPC+ 46
kg/m' silica fume) Hence, OK

D-7 PROPORTION OF VOLUME OF COARSEAGGREGATE AND FINE AGGREGATE

From Table 6, volume of coarse aggregate corresponding to 20 mm size aggregate and fine
aggregate grading Zone II = 0.62 per unit volume oftotal aggregate. This is valid for water­
cement ratio of 0.50. As water-cement ratio is actually 0.28, the ratio is-taken as 0.66 to reduce
sand content.

Volumeoffine aggregate content = 1 - 0.66 = 0.34 per unit volume oftotal aggregate

D-8 MIX CALCULATIONS

(a) Voltrnneofconcrete 1 m!

(b) Volumeofcement (Mass of cement/Specific gravity ofcement) x

(l/lOOO) = (41 Si3.1 5) x lfIOOO= 0.133 m 3

(c) Volumeof silicafume (Mass ofsilica fume/Specific gravity of silica fume) x

. 1/1000
.. = (46/2.2) x 1/1000
=0.021 m'

(d) Volumeofwater (Mass of water/Specific gravity of water) x 1/1000

= (13011) x 111000
= 0.11m 3

25

0:1--.
IRC:44-2008
-.", - .J .•

,,,
,.
. ... • • ••

•• I ,
~. • f·' ... ~

(e) Volume of , (Mass'ofc~~~licab;t~!~~e~p~cifici,graYityj)f' ' '()' '

chemical admixture admixture) x (1/1000)
(superp1asticizer) ,':= (9.28/1.2) x 1/1000 ;':.,
[@ 2.0 per cent by mass = 0.008 m'
, I : ~

.'.'-
, ofcementitious
- material]
.. ....
.' "

~"
I'.. ' .

(f) Volume ofali-in-aggregate = -{ a-(b+c+d+e)}

= {1-(0.133+0.021 +0. 13+0.008)}
'I',,,,,. '-"C;
= 0.708 rrr'
,., , \

(g) Mass of coarse aggregate ' .= (f) x volume of-coarse aggregate x Specific gravity
, . . " ", - I, .). i . . "
,',. ,'--- of coarse aggi:egate x 1000 ' "
= 0.708 x 0.66 x 2.74 x 1000
, ' , r :' .. ,,'
, . -,
, -", ',:. ,........;.
, = 1280.3.Say
. '
1280 kg/m'
rr·',· .:~.' ';l i '" '.

,(h) Mass offine'aggregate " ' = (f) x volume offine aggregate x Specifi;cgravity.of
fine aggregate x 1000
, " '~0.708 x 0.34 x 2.62x 1000
" "':',"~Y"_~'.,'~ '1'; q-' ",;' '=630.7Say631kg/m3 i

D-9X 'MIX:PROPORTION 'FORTRIAL .NUMBER:: ('ON AGGREGATE I~ SSD

j,CONDiTION:.i ' :.
,
" :ij , '-'"
~ r;'. \ '
." .' .. ( i f~J

Cement = 418 kg/rrr'

Silica fume (SF) = 46 kg/m'

\ ·.. 0 -s- 0) '; ­

Water = 130 kgVftP'" , '
Fine Aggregate = 631 kg/m' ; f j ~i:

Coarse Aggregate = 1280 kg/m'

Chemical Admixture = 9.28 kg/m' . '

"

Water-Cement + SF ratio = 0.28

1

D-9.2 MIX"PRqpdRTr9.N,'FoR,t~IALN~~~ER1 ON AGGRtGATE IN DRY

CONDITION':MIX PROPORTION oN DRY AGGREGATE BASIS
, .:- .•" :q~:-I
.. . /~."' . . . :.:. ':.':~-' -y. . . . .,..':;,' ,

Cement=418l:g7m3,;~. ;' -'

Silica fume (SF) = 46 kg/rn' .'

Water = 130+6.3+6.4 = 142.7 kg/rri'

Fine Aggregate = 624.7 kg/m' '(631 ,-: 1.0% of 631)

Coarse Aggregate> I273.6kg/)TI3,., (1280,-: 0.5 % of 1280)" .:. :~ '~' .. rL ,, ,

'

CHem~calAggregate'7 9.Z8-kgMi? ':<1"; "', ... ~~I.!, ,~

Water-Cement + SF ratio = 0.28 .
j{l~

All other steps will.remain same as C-10 to C-12.

26

------_.
7

(The officialamendments to thisdocumentwould be published bythe IRe in its

periodical, "IndianHighways", whichshallbe considered as effective and as
part ofthe code/guidelines/manual, etc.fromthe datespecified therein)