Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 190 views

    Snuffler 1207

    Uploaded by

    schwa1234
    Geophysics was conducted at Abbey Fields Roman site in Faversham, Kent. The magnetometry survey revealed significant metal debris scattered across the northern field, likely from a nearby dump site visible in historical aerial images. Two possible archaeological ditch features were also detected in the southwest. The resistivity survey identified a curving high resistance feature that may be archaeological or geological in origin, extending south towards anomalies seen in the magnetometry data.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Snuffler 1207

    Uploaded by

    schwa1234
    190 views6 pages
    Geophysics was conducted at Abbey Fields Roman site in Faversham, Kent. The magnetometry survey revealed significant metal debris scattered across the northern field, likely from a nearby dump site visible in historical aerial images. Two possible archaeological ditch features were also detected in the southwest. The resistivity survey identified a curving high resistance feature that may be archaeological or geological in origin, extending south towards anomalies seen in the magnetometry data.

    Original Description:

    Geophysics at the site of a Roman building at Abbey Fields, Faversham

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Geophysics was conducted at Abbey Fields Roman site in Faversham, Kent. The magnetometry survey revealed significant metal debris scattered across the northern field, likely from a nearby dump site visible in historical aerial images. Two possible archaeological ditch features were also detected in the southwest. The resistivity survey identified a curving high resistance feature that may be archaeological or geological in origin, extending south towards anomalies seen in the magnetometry data.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    190 views6 pages

    Snuffler 1207

    Uploaded by

    schwa1234
    Geophysics was conducted at Abbey Fields Roman site in Faversham, Kent. The magnetometry survey revealed significant metal debris scattered across the northern field, likely from a nearby dump site visible in historical aerial images. Two possible archaeological ditch features were also detected in the southwest. The resistivity survey identified a curving high resistance feature that may be archaeological or geological in origin, extending south towards anomalies seen in the magnetometry data.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    Site Code.

    ABBEYFIELDS12 Site identification Abbey Fields, Faversham and address County, district Kent and / or borough O.S. grid ref. TR022617 Geology. Clay Head and Alluvium over Thanet Sands Project number. SNUFFLER1207 Fieldwork type. Geophysics Site type. Date of fieldwork. July 2012 Sponsor/client. Kent Archaeological Field School Project manager. David Staveley Project supervisor. Period summary Project summary. Geophysics at the site of a Roman building at Abbey Fields, Faversham (100 word max) Roman

    Geophysics at Abbey Fields Roman Site


    by David Staveley
    Introduction Abbey Fields, Faversham is the site of a set of Roman buildings, near what would have been a tidal inlet off of Faversham Creek. It is currently under excavation by the Kent Archaeological Field School, and Paul Wilkinson asked for a geophysics survey to find further areas of archaeological interest within the field. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Paul Wilkinson of Kent Archaeological Field School for making this survey possible, Jonny from Digitise This for the GNSS work and Brian Powell for helping out with the survey. Methodology The magnetometer survey was undertaken using a Bartington GRAD601-2 fluxgate gradiometer, walking east-west along lines spaced 1 metre apart and recording 4 readings per metre in 40 metre grids. The data was processed using Snuffler geophysics software, with despike, destripe and interpolation (Y only) filters applied. The earth resistance survey was undertaken using a TR Systems earth resistance meter, recording 1 reading per metre in 20 metre grids. The data was processed using Snuffler geophysics software, with despike and interpolation filters applied. Positioning 20 metre grids were set out and recorded in OSGB36/OSTN02 by Digitise This using a Leica GNSS network RTK rover. The coordinates of relevant points on the interpretation are given below. Description M1 M2 M3 M4 R1 R2 R3 R4 North 161754.63 161734.90 161618.61 161638.34 161710.93 161706.00 161686.62 161691.55 East 602222.74 602300.27 602270.67 602193.14 602232.25 602251.64 602246.70 602227.32

    Magnetometry Results

    Resistivity Results

    Interpretation

    The lines and text in red are the areas marked on KAFS plans. The survey areas are bounded by dotted black lines, with relevant positioning points in blue, M for magnetometry and R for earth resistance. For magnetometry, modern features are shown as purple, and possible archaeological features are shown in green. For earth resistance, high resistance features are shown in orange. The magnetometry results are unfortunately very poor, with a large amount of metal junk strewn around, particularly on the northern side of the survey. The cause of this can be seen on the 2003 Google Earth imagery, with a large amount of rubbish visible across the northern part of the field. The broad spread of this metal junk is shown as a light purple area, with particularly strong readings shown in dark purple. Of particular note are the strong linear features running north-south and eastwest. The north-south feature makes a turn where it intersects the east-west feature, so it seems they are linked. The cause of this feature is most likely an electrical cable, as there is a pole at the northern end of the north-south linear feature, which has a cable leading into the ground. This itself produces a large magnetic response. Of possible archaeological interest are two weak features in the south-west part of the survey. They look to be ditch features.

    The resistivity results show a roughly 6 metres wide and curving weak high resistance feature, shown in light orange. Where the cable and a strong magnetic feature intersect this, the readings are stronger, shown in dark purple. This is most likely due to material from the high resistance feature lower down being brought further towards the surface when the cable and other feature were excavated in modern times. It is not clear whether the feature is archaeological or geological, but its progression further south may coincide with the eastern possibly archaeological feature in the magnetometry results.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy