0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views

C Band

Vito Carriero and Tony DiRienzo successfully received C-band satellite signals using small offset dishes that are typically only used for Ku-band reception. Vito was able to lock onto stable signals from various satellites using a 1.2-meter dish. Tony then showed that reception was also possible using an even smaller 1.0-meter dish. Both found that a cone-shaped scalar ring improved signal quality compared to a standard scalar ring. Their experiments demonstrate that C-band reception is feasible with small dishes, opening up new possibilities for satellite hobbyists with space or weather constraints.

Uploaded by

juansearg
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views

C Band

Vito Carriero and Tony DiRienzo successfully received C-band satellite signals using small offset dishes that are typically only used for Ku-band reception. Vito was able to lock onto stable signals from various satellites using a 1.2-meter dish. Tony then showed that reception was also possible using an even smaller 1.0-meter dish. Both found that a cone-shaped scalar ring improved signal quality compared to a standard scalar ring. Their experiments demonstrate that C-band reception is feasible with small dishes, opening up new possibilities for satellite hobbyists with space or weather constraints.

Uploaded by

juansearg
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SATELLITE RECEPTION

DX Report

C-band With a Ku-band Dish? Could It Be?


Ron Roessel
I was sitting here looking at all the work I had to do for this issue trying to decide where to start when an e-mail popped up on my PC screen. It was from a DXer in Canada and he wanted to know if wed be interested in hearing about his success with C-band reception using a small dish. I replied by saying that I too have a small prime focus C-band dish that is 1.6 meters in diameter and that Ive had good results with that. Well, what about a 1.2-meter or even a 1.0-meter offset dish? he then asked. Naturally, upon hearing this, I had no choice but to stop what I was doing and nd out more.

The Cone-shaped Scalar Ring C-band reception with antennas this small is unheard of and to the best of our knowledge has been attempted in the past but never with any positive results. Of course, the C-band satellites that are in orbit today are much more powerful than those from just a few years ago so it stands to reason Vito Carriero lives in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He has been an avid DXer for many years. One day he decided to see what that you can get away with smaller dishes. But, only 1.2 meters? This we had to see. And even smaller?

Vito and Tony Setting Up the 1.2-Meter Antenna he could do with a 1.2-meter dish pointed at some of the more popular C-band satellites. The ingredients for his experiment included: Fortec Star 1.2-Meter Offset Dish Stab HH 120 Motor

Eagle Aspen C Band LNBF (NR: 15K, Gain: 62dB) Cone Shaped Scalar Ring C-Band LNBF Holder for an Offset Dish Fortec Star 5400NA Receiver Some of you might be saying right now: Scalar Ring? C-band LNBF? On an offset dish? Clearly, these items are normally not found on an offset dish so some modication of the LNB mount was necessary. The standard Ku mount was removed in favor of a customized C-band mount with a clamp large enough to accommodate the diameter of the C-band LNBF. The 1.2-meter antenna was mounted on a Stab H-H motor, which in turn was installed on a vertical pole cemented into the ground. This was all connected to a Fortec Star 5400NA receiver. The antenna was rst tted with a Ku-band LNBF so that its alignment could be optimized. The antenna was moved from one The Ku end of the satellite arc to the other to verify everything was properly adjusted. LNBF was then replaced with the Eagle Aspen C-band LNBF so that the fun could begin. Vito rst pointed his dish to Intelsat 805 at 55.5 west primarily because of its strong beams but also because of his interest in foreign language programming. Initial results were impressive: the receiver was able to lock onto 15 C-band transponders of which 14 of these signals produced stable video and audio! Vito rst used a standard Scalar ring but discovered that using a cone-shaped scalar ring improved signal quality by roughly 10%. So, with the success of Intelsat 805, it was time to move on to other satellites to see what could be done. Similar results were obtained with numerous other C-band satellites. The receiver was able to lock on to C-band transponders from Pas 1R, Pas 9, AMC 6, AMC 3, Galaxy 11, Intelsat Americas 6, Galaxy 3C, Intelsat Americas 5, Galaxy 4R, AMC 4, AMC 1 and Anik F1. Most of the transponders on these satellites that were recognizable by the receiver produced stable video and audio. There were of course a few

transponders with signals that were borderline and made for unstable video and audio but overall the results were quite good. The next logical question would be: what about a dish thats even smaller? Tony DiRienzo, a DXer also out of Toronto in Canada, was thinking along the same lines. He decided to attempt C-band reception with a 1.0-meter dish. His recipe included the following: Fortec Star 1.0-Meter Offset Dish Stab HH 100 Motor Astrotel Precision C Band LNBF (NR: 20K, Gain: 65dB) Cone Shaped Scalar Ring C-Band LNBF Holder for an Offset Dish Fortec Star 5400NA Receiver Just like Vito did with his 1.2-meter experiment, Tony also rst used a Ku-band LNBF to optimize the alignment of his antenna. Once this task was nished, he switched over to the C-band LNBF to see what he could do. Believe it or not, he too was able to show that C-band reception with a small 1.0-meter dish was possible! The dish was rst pointed to AMC 12 because it is known to have a very strong transponder at 3.866 V. He was not disappointed. The receiver quickly locked onto this transponder and identied three channels. It went on from there. He achieved the most success on Galaxy 11 by locking onto a total of 15 channels of which 12 were religious channels and two were encrypted. He was also successful in locking onto transponders on Intelsat Americas 13, Anik F2, Anik F1, AMC1, AMC4, Galaxy 4, AMC6, Intelsat 805, Panamsat 1, NSS 806 and NSS 7. All in all, it is safe to say that these experiments were very successful. DXers and The 1.0-Meter Dish on a STAB HH 100 Motor ally was. C-band antennas take up quite a bit of space and were usually never an option for those who lived in apartment buildings or in houses in and around populated areas. But now that it has been shown that C-band signals can be received with a dish as small as 1.0 meter in diameter, it is quite possible that this entire train of thought is about to change. All of the C-band testing described above was performed in perfect weather conditions. The situation hardly changes Unlike the even if the weather turns sour. weekend satellite hobbyists alike always want to be able to get as many channels as possible with the system they have. The problem with C-band has always been that it required a much larger diameter antenna than Ku-band. Even if the cost of a 10-foot dish was not an obstacle, its installation usuThe Complete 1.0-Meter Dish Assembly Astrotel LNBF with Cone-shaped Scalar Ring on the 1.0-Meter Dish

Ku-band where a rain shower could have a profound effect on signal reception, only marginal degradation of the C-band signal Screenshot of NASA TV on AMC 6 (4040 V) with 1.2-Meter Dish Screenshot of Peru TV on IS 805 (3794 H) with 1.2-Meter Dish was observed in bad weather. Even so, this is a giant step in the right direction!

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy