Foreign Market Entry Modes
Foreign Market Entry Modes
Foreign Market Entry Modes
The decision of how to enter a foreign market can have a significant impact on the results. Expansion into foreign markets can be achieved via the following four mechanisms:
Exporting Exporting is the marketing and direct sale of domestically-produced goods in another country. Exporting is a traditional and well-established method of reaching foreign markets. Since exporting does not require that the goods be produced in the target country, no investment in foreign production facilities is required. Most of the costs associated with exporting take the form of marketing expenses. Exporting commonly requires coordination among four players:
Licensing Licensing essentially permits a company in the target country to use the property of the licensor. Such property usually is intangible, such as trademarks, patents, and production techniques. The licensee pays a fee in exchange for the rights to use the intangible property and possibly for technical assistance. Because little investment on the part of the licensor is required, licensing has the potential to provide a very large ROI. However, because the licensee produces and markets the product, potential returns from manufacturing and marketing activities may be lost.
Joint Venture There are five common objectives in a joint venture: market entry, risk/reward sharing, technology sharing and joint product development, and conforming to government regulations. Other benefits include political connections and distribution channel access that may depend on relationships. Such alliances often are favorable when:
the partners' strategic goals converge while their competitive goals diverge; the partners' size, market power, and resources are small compared to the industry leaders; and partners' are able to learn from one another while limiting access to their own proprietary skills.
The key issues to consider in a joint venture are ownership, control, length of agreement, pricing, technology transfer, local firm capabilities and resources, and government intentions. Potential problems include:
conflict over asymmetric new investments mistrust over proprietary knowledge performance ambiguity - how to split the pie lack of parent firm support cultural clashes if, how, and when to terminate the relationship
Strategic imperative: the partners want to maximize the advantage gained for the joint venture, but they also want to maximize their own competitive position. The joint venture attempts to develop shared resources, but each firm wants to develop and protect its own proprietary resources. The joint venture is controlled through negotiations and coordination processes, while each firm would like to have hierarchical control.
Foreign Direct Investment Foreign direct investment (FDI) is the direct ownership of facilities in the target country. It involves the transfer of resources including capital, technology, and personnel. Direct foreign investment may be made through the acquisition of an existing entity or the establishment of a new enterprise.
Direct ownership provides a high degree of control in the operations and the ability to better know the consumers and competitive environment. However, it requires a high level of resources and a high degree of commitment.
The Case of EuroDisney Different modes of entry may be more appropriate under different circumstances, and the mode of entry is an important factor in the success of the project. Walt Disney Co. faced the challenge of building a theme park in Europe. Disney's mode of entry in Japan had been licensing. However, the firm chose direct investment in its European theme park, owning 49% with the remaining 51% held publicly. Besides the mode of entry, another important element in Disney's decision was exactly where in Europe to locate. There are many factors in the site selection decision, and a company carefully must define and evaluate the criteria for choosing a location. The problems with the EuroDisney project illustrate that even if a company has been successful in the past, as Disney had been with its California, Florida, and Tokyo theme parks, future success is not guaranteed, especially when moving into a different country and culture. The appropriate adjustments for national differences always should be made.
Comparision of Market Entry Options The following table provides a summary of the possible modes of foreign market entry:
Comparison of Foreign Market Entry Modes Mode Conditions Favoring this Mode
Limited sales potential in target country; little product adaptation required Distribution channels close to plants Minimizes risk and investment. Speed of entry High target country production costs Liberal import policies High political risk Maximizes scale; uses existing facilities.
Advantages
Disadvantages
Trade barriers & tariffs add to costs. Transport costs Limits access to local information Company viewed as an outsider
Exporting
Import and investment barriers Legal protection possible in target environment. Minimizes risk and investment. Speed of entry Able to circumvent trade barriers High ROI Lack of control over use of assets. Licensee may become competitor. Knowledge spillovers License period is limited
Licensing
Low sales potential in target country. Large cultural distance Licensee lacks ability to become a competitor. Import barriers Large cultural distance Assets cannot be fairly priced High sales potential
Overcomes ownership restrictions and cultural distance Combines resources of 2 companies. Potential for learning
Difficult to manage Dilution of control Greater risk than exporting a & licensing Knowledge spillovers Partner may become a competitor.
Joint Ventures
Some political risk Government restrictions on foreign Viewed as insider ownership Local company can provide skills, resources, distribution network, brand name, etc. Import barriers Small cultural distance Less investment required
Greater knowledge of local market Can better apply specialized skills Minimizes knowledge spillover Can be viewed as an insider
Higher risk than other modes Requires more resources and commitment May be difficult to manage the local resources
McDonalds burgers come with chilli sauce. Coca-cola is some parts of the world taste sweeter than in other places. The arguments for standardisation state that the process of adapting the product to local markets does little more than add to the overall cost of producing the product and weakens the brand on the global scale. In todays global world, where consumers travel more, watch satellite television, communicate and shop internationally over the internet, the world is a smaller than it used to be. Because of this there is no need to adapt products to local markets. Brands such as MTV, Nike, Levis are all successful global brands where they have a standardised approach to their marketing mix, all these products are targeted at similar groups globally. As you can see both strategies; using a standard product and an customised product can work just as well. The right approach for each organisation will depend on their product, strength of the brand and the foreign market that the marketing is aimed at.
Conclusion
Prior to designing an international marketing mix a business should carry out a PEST analysis for every country they would like to operate in. This will help them determine what elements of the marketing mix can be standardised and which elements will need adjustments to suit local needs. It may well be that a business is
able to use a standard marketing mix in the majority of cases and only need to adjust it on the rare occasion. Or every country may need its own marketing mix.