Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 89 views

    Phonetic Detail in Connected Speech

    Uploaded by

    bookwormdiva
    This document discusses how phonetic detail in connected speech reflects linguistic structure and may be important for speech understanding. Some key points: - Phonetic detail includes variations from coarticulation, assimilation, prosody, rate of speech, and more. This detail maps onto abstract linguistic units like phonemes, syllables, words, and grammar. - Phonetic detail provides probabilistic cues rather than invariant cues. The context, like surrounding sounds and probabilistic factors, influence how units are realized. - Perceptual studies suggest listeners can use phonetic detail to identify words, grammatical distinctions, and prosodic structure even when segments are obscured. - Taking the full context into account is

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Phonetic Detail in Connected Speech

    Uploaded by

    bookwormdiva
    89 views33 pages
    This document discusses how phonetic detail in connected speech reflects linguistic structure and may be important for speech understanding. Some key points: - Phonetic detail includes variations from coarticulation, assimilation, prosody, rate of speech, and more. This detail maps onto abstract linguistic units like phonemes, syllables, words, and grammar. - Phonetic detail provides probabilistic cues rather than invariant cues. The context, like surrounding sounds and probabilistic factors, influence how units are realized. - Perceptual studies suggest listeners can use phonetic detail to identify words, grammatical distinctions, and prosodic structure even when segments are obscured. - Taking the full context into account is

    Original Description:

    A document on Phonetics, its details and its usage in Connected Speech

    Original Title

    Phonetic Detail In Connected Speech

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses how phonetic detail in connected speech reflects linguistic structure and may be important for speech understanding. Some key points: - Phonetic detail includes variations from coarticulation, assimilation, prosody, rate of speech, and more. This detail maps onto abstract linguistic units like phonemes, syllables, words, and grammar. - Phonetic detail provides probabilistic cues rather than invariant cues. The context, like surrounding sounds and probabilistic factors, influence how units are realized. - Perceptual studies suggest listeners can use phonetic detail to identify words, grammatical distinctions, and prosodic structure even when segments are obscured. - Taking the full context into account is

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    89 views33 pages

    Phonetic Detail in Connected Speech

    Uploaded by

    bookwormdiva
    This document discusses how phonetic detail in connected speech reflects linguistic structure and may be important for speech understanding. Some key points: - Phonetic detail includes variations from coarticulation, assimilation, prosody, rate of speech, and more. This detail maps onto abstract linguistic units like phonemes, syllables, words, and grammar. - Phonetic detail provides probabilistic cues rather than invariant cues. The context, like surrounding sounds and probabilistic factors, influence how units are realized. - Perceptual studies suggest listeners can use phonetic detail to identify words, grammatical distinctions, and prosodic structure even when segments are obscured. - Taking the full context into account is

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 33

    Phonetic detail in connected speech

    Katharine Barden Paper 9: Foundations of Speech Communication Week 7, Michaelmas 2009

    Aims
    To consider how the phonetic detail of speech reflects linguistic structure and function To explore the hypothesis that phonetic detail is central to speech understanding To raise questions about whether the identification of particular phonological units is necessary for speech perception

    Standard assumption (production):


    Words are stored as discrete strings of phonemes BUT, they dont emerge as discrete invariant strings of phonemes in articulation and acoustics
    physical constraints (instantaneous movement between phonemic targets is impossible) coarticulation phonological processes e.g. assimilation allophonic variation style, rate, emotion probabilistic factors frequency, neighbourhood density prosodic influences (e.g. phrase boundaries, focus) discourse context (e.g. turn-taking) speaker differences (accent, age, health etc.)

    Standard assumption (perception):


    During perception, the signal has to be converted back into discrete phonemes Once this is done, the speech signal isnt needed (intonation) any further
    meaning (connotation) meaning (denotation) grammar lexical item phoneme 1 phoneme 2 phoneme 3

    SPEECH SIGNAL

    Variability: Noise or information?


    There is lots of variability in the signal that is not understood and that might be random But.
    much variation is systematic and provides linguistic (and non-linguistic) information that might be useful in speech perception

    Contributes to speech intelligibility Can enhance meaning

    What is (fine) phonetic detail?


    Introduced about 25 years ago by John Local and colleagues Since then, it has been applied to any systematic phonetic variation that is not considered a major, usually local, perceptual cue for phonemic contrasts in the citation forms of lexical items Some PD is indeed fine and subtle, but other types are perfectly audible; they have just not been factored into the prevailing theory that perceptual processing of phonetic information is entirely aimed at identifying strings of features or phonemes that allow words to be distinguished

    Phonetic detail indicates:


    coarticulation position in syllable; word boundaries; morpheme boundaries long-domain cues to phonemes/features grammatical status indexical information places you can join in a conversation prosodic structure rate and style of speech probabilistic characteristics, e.g. frequency

    Long-domain coarticulation
    Coarticulation is not restricted to adjacent segments Some coarticulatory effects cross syllable and word boundaries
    lip rounding nasalisation resonance effects of //
    can be perceptually useful in a forced-choice test (e.g. belly vs berry), listeners could correctly identify a missing // when surrounding vowels and consonants were replaced by noise (West, 2000)

    The segmentation problem: discrete words from a continuous signal


    but Pat sawed them / but Pats awed them we dread the reviews / wed read the reviews
    0.5091
    0.7187

    0
    0

    -0.7564

    -0.7509

    0 Time (s)

    0.894014

    0 Time (s)

    0.943447

    Allophonic variation indicates word boundaries


    Assuming that phonetic detail is discarded after the identification of phonemes... Sounds like: Mental lexicon?: Meaning is ambiguous:

    [ktnaI] /ktnaIt/

    [knaI]

    car tonight or Carter Knight?

    Further word segmentation processes are required for disambiguation

    A more parsimonious model of speech perception would make use of the systematic phonetic information in the signal to assign probable word boundaries

    Allophonic variation indicates word boundaries


    /katsaIz/ cats eyes or cat size /s/ longer when in onset of second syllable quality and degree of diphthongisation in second syllable may differ
    Hawkins and Smith, 2001

    Evidence that infants use allophonic information


    8.5-month-old English-learning infants were familiarised with dice. In a preference task: passages containing dice > unrelated word: preferred passages containing d # ice = unrelated word (e.g. cold ice) : not preferred
    Mattys & Jusczyk, 2001

    Grammatical status
    Phonetic detail differs between the same words when they serve a different grammatical function e.g.
    Function vs content words: (Lavoie, 2002) for much more reduced than four Different grammatical roles: infinitival to tends to be shorter and more reduced than prepositional to complementizer that tends to be shorter and more reduced than pronominal that
    (Jurafsky, 2002)

    Listeners are sensitive to these differences between function words and content words
    (Baker, 2008)

    Phonetic detail indicates grammatical structure


    Many function words begin with //:
    the, this, that, those, then, thus, therefore

    No content words begin with //and it occurs within only a few content words:
    mother, other, bother, father, smithereens, soothe, smoothie

    Connected speech processes differ for // in content words and function words
    content
    at] ban thatch [ban n [ba at] at] *[ban

    function
    ban that [banat]

    ban zips

    [banzIps] nzIps] [ba Ips] [baz Ips] *[ban

    ban this [ban Is]

    (Local, 2003)

    ban these [ban iz]

    lath] all that [

    Courtesy John Local

    win those /n/ is not realised as [n]


    ] but as [n
    Time (ms)

    Listeners report hearing // in tokens like these They can generally distinguish win noes from win those, even when the fricative is completely nasalized Manuel suggests that low F2 at the release of the nasal is a cue to dental rather than alveolar place of articulation

    Frequency (kHz)

    Manuel (1995, J.Phonetics)

    Grammar and phonetic detail

    lime vs. Im
    content pro + be in ordinary lexical items, word-final m does not usually assimilate to the place of articulation of the following consonant in English, while n does

    the line goes there

    but not

    * the lime goes there

    Grammar and phonetic detail

    lime vs. Im
    content pro + be However, in the grammatical chunk Im (= I am) assimilation regularly happens in everyday talk
    aIm aIn aI

    aI m

    aI n

    aI

    aI w

    Sounds courtesy John Local, U. York

    Grammar and detail: lime vs. Im


    + assimilation of nasal Im blowing [aI m] Im throwing Im going Im watching [aI n] [aI ]
    ] [aIw

    - assimilation of nasal * lime throws * climb goes * crime wave etc

    Im contrasts with:
    youre, shes, hes, were, theyre, its

    lime contrasts with:


    lamb, land, live, line, rime, right, ride, lemon, .....& lots more ...... always diphthong & [m]

    True and pseudo prefixes


    (Morphemic structure of words in natural sentences)
    Productive

    mistimes

    Unproductive

    mistakes

    Productive True prefix (Pr) mistimes Unproductive Pseudo prefix (Ps) mistakes

    True and pseudo prefixes


    (Morphemic structure of words in natural sentences)
    Pr

    Ps

    Same phonemes: /mst/ but PD systematically reflects morphological status: properties of periodic part
    duration abruptness of [m] boundary F2 frequency (etc)

    relative durations e.g.: True prefix (Pr) Pseudo prefix (Ps) mistimes mistakes
    periodicity : aperiodicity (fric) fricative : silence (closure) VOT
    Baker, Smith, Hawkins ICPhS 2007; Baker 2008 PhD dissertation

    True and pseudo prefixes


    (Morphemic structure of words in natural sentences) True morpheme 1 Pseudo morpheme 2 match (control)
    [I bet Tess]1 [mis]2 [times them]1

    mistimes mistakes mismatch (exptl)


    [I bet Tess]1 [mis]2 [times them]1

    intelligibility in noise worse when mismatched details of sound patterns can signal morphemic status
    Rachel Baker, PhD 2008; Baker, Hawkins and Smith, 2007, ASA; Wurm, 1997

    Phonetic detail and prosodic structure


    Many phonetic cues to prosodic structure...
    more next term for paper 3
    prosody (intonation, rhythm, stress)

    more next term for paper 9


    prosodic-segmental interactions

    Phonetic detail and discourse structure


    (See Lecture on Phonetics in Conversation) Turn-taking Turn co-completion

    New vs. given information


    Words are pronounced with greater duration and clarity when they introduce new information into a discourse than when they refer to given information (e.g., Bolinger, 1963; Chafe,1974;
    Hawkins & Warren, 1994) (from Bowdle, B.F. and Wright, R. (1998) Research on Spoken Language Processing, Progress Report 22, 345-353)

    Summary so far...
    Phonetic detail maps onto many different abstract units of linguistic structure
    one sound chunk can signal many abstract units (with different probability levels)

    Phonetic detail can be perceptually useful


    Models advocating early abstraction from the detail of the speech signal do not make optimal use of the available cues Phonetic detail must be represented in memory and related to abstract linguistic structure

    Summary so far...
    For any given unit U
    (e.g. segment, syllable, foot, word...)

    U is functionally inseparable from its context If something in the context changes, there will probably be consequences for the phonetic realisation and perceptionof U Only when whole context is taken into account is the systematicity of phonetic detail evident Taking account of context can help to make sense of variation that would otherwise appear random

    Context
    Context does not just refer to linguistic structure also probabilistic factors
    word frequency neighbourhood density predictability

    Context
    Context does not just refer to linguistic structure also probabilistic factors
    word frequency neighbourhood density predictability

    also register and attitude

    Very reduced/casual speech


    Idonotknow I do not know I dont know I dunno dunno

    speech style contributes to (non-linguistic) meaning

    Is the identification of sublexical units always a necessary stage in speech perception? Is the identification of words always a necessary stage in speech perception?

    Summary
    Phonetic detail signals all sorts of linguistic categories, and linguistic and communicative functions Taking a broader context into account can help make sense of seemingly random variation linguistic structure, prosodic structure, probabilistic factors, register, attitude, speaker, situation...

    Summary
    Much phonetic detail is learnable and perceptually salient, and at least some of it makes speech easier to understand in at least some circumstances If we take understanding meaning to be the aim of listening to speech (rather than phoneme or word identification), it may ultimately be easier to make sense of the variation in the speech signal

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy